DOCSLIB.ORG

AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Published by Number 1301 Thm AMERICAN MUSEUM of NATURAL History November 6, 1945 New York City

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Published by Number 1301 Thm AMERICAN MUSEUM of NATURAL History November 6, 1945 New York City AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Published by Number 1301 THm AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HIsTORY November 6, 1945 New York City THE HYOID BONES IN PROTOCERA TOPS AND IN. PSITTACOSA URUS1 By EDWIN H. COLBERT INTRODUCTION During the preparation of a skeleton of in order that the published knowledge con- Protoceratops, Mr. Otto Falkenbach of the cerning Protoceratops, contained in several American Museum Paleontological Labora- papers but especially in the study by tory discovered two small bones which Brown and Schlaikjer (1940), may be as when first seen appeared to be quite unlike complete as possible. At the same time, it any elements hitherto known in this dino- was felt that certain comparisons with other saur. At first it was thought that these dinosaurs of varying relationships to bones might be portions of the sternum, Protoceratops should be included in this but comparisons soon showed that such study. Such is the subject matter that will could not be the case. Indeed, various be treated in the following pages. comparisons with the known osteological The author wishes to express his appre- elements of Protoceratops confirmed the ciation to Mr. Falkenbach, who in the first impression, namely, that these were course of his skillful preparation of the bones hitherto undescribed, so the question specimen of Protoceratops made the discov- arose as to what these bones might be. ery of these new bones. To Dr. Gregory Several possibilities were considered and must go the credit of making the suggestion several opinions were sought, with the re- as to their being hyoids, and to him my full- sult that Dr. William King Gregory of the est acknowledgments are hereby expressed. American Museum suggested that these Subsequently a portion of another bone was might be hyoid elements. The more this found, and this may represent an addi- possibility was investigated, the more tional element in the hyoid apparatus of likely it seemed to be. All subsequent in- Protoceratops. The translation from FiXr- vestigations have tended to confirm this bringer was made by Dr. Otto Haas. view. Finally credit should go to Mr. John C. It has been felt desirable to bring out a Germann, Staff Artist, for the excellent il- description of these supposed hyoid bones, lustrations that appear in this paper. DESCRIPTION AND DISCUSSION Before making a formal description of the hyoids in modern reptiles was set forth these supposed hyoids of Protoceratops, it by Fuirbringer in his monograph on the min,y be well to consider briefly the homolo- hyoids of the vertebrates (1922). A trans- gies of the hyoid bones in the tetrapods, lation of this statement follows: and their development particularly in mod- "As has been known in the main for a ern reptiles. long time, the hyoid of living reptiles con- A very illuminating statement describ- sists, at its highest stage of development, ing the development and the homologies of of an unpaired body, the corpus (Copula; 1 Publications of the Asiatic Expeditions of the basihyal and basibranchial) [basibranchial American Museum of Natural History, Contribution No. 148. and hypobranchial according to Goodrich] 2 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITA TES [No. 1301 tapering in a forward direction into a nar- mellar apparatus of the middle ear, also, rower process, the processus lingualis (proc- an element in the hyoid arch, but this con- essus entoglossus), which varies in length nection has been lost in most of the reptiles and is bound into the posterior part of the and has undergone considerable redqction tongue, and of three pairs of horns con- in many of them. This horn is very sig- nected laterally in various ways with the nificant morphologically and therefore has corpus, an anterior pair, the cornu hyale, been named the cornu principale by Gaupp, a middle pair, the cornu branchiale I, and a but it is inferior in size and strength to the C B Ch1 Ch CbI Cb2 C Cb2 Cblt A E D )CJkCh Cb2, Fig. 1. A comparison of the hyoids in the living reptiles. A, Crocodilia: Crocodilus, original. B, Rhynchocephalia: Sphenodon, after Furbringer. C, Squamata: Lacerta, after Goodrich. D, Squamata, Vipera, after Ftrbringer. E, Chelonia: Clemmys, after Forbringer. Not to scale. Key to abbreviations: C-corpus, including the hypohyal or entoglossal. Ch-ceratohyal and epi- hyal; cornu hyale. Cbl-ceratobranchial I; cornu branchiale I. Cb2-ceratobranchial II; cornu branchiale II. posterior pair, the cornu branchiale II, following horn. This horn, the cornu and these are derived from the ordinary branchiale I, which is derived from the first hyoid arch and the first two gill arches. branchial or third visceral arch, is dorsally In the more primitive forms the cornu hy- free and it proves by its permanence and ale is found to be connected with the colu- by the fact that it is ossified when all other 1945] HYOID BONES IN PROTOCERATOPS AND PSITTACOSAURUS 3 portions of the hyoid are cartilaginous, to are pictured. This diagram will, of course, be the most prominent part of the hyoid supplement the summary written by Fiur- complex. The cornu branchiale II, derived bringer and presented above. Homologies from the second branchial or fourth visceral are derived from a comparison with the con- arch, is considerably reduced, and fre- dition in fishes. quently in many reptiles it is split up into a Various names have been applied to the ventral and a dorsal portion, while it may hyoid elements shown in this diagram. It disappear completely in some forms. This may be well, therefore, to include at this horn, too, is as a rule dorsally free, but in place a table to show the system of nomen- some isolated cases it is connected with the clature used for the hyoid elements by dorsal end of the cornu hyale. Starting Futrbringer in 1922, as compared with the with the highest level of development, the system used by Goodrich in 1930, and that hyoid of many reptiles, most of which may followed by Camp in his classification of be considered as advanced forms, is subject the lizards, 1923, and more recent papers. FtRBRINGER GOODRICH CAMP Corpus Corpus or Copula Corpus Entoglossal Entoglossal process Hypohyal Cornu hyale Hyoid cornu Ceratohyal Epihyal Cornu branchiale I First branchial cornu Ceratobranchial I Epibranchial I Cornu branchiale II Second branchial cornu Ceratobranchial II Epibranchial II to reduction. This may start sometimes In the present work Camp's terminology with the first horn, the cornu hyale, some- is used. times with the last one, the cornu bran- In this present discussion our interest, as chiale II, or it may take place simulta- far as recent reptiles are concerned, is cen- neously at the anterior and posterior ends. tered upon the Crocodilia since these ani- "(For a more detailed survey, reference mals, most closely among the living forms, is made to Gaupp's excellent synthesis of approach the dinosaurs in their morphologi- the ontogeny and phylogeny of the sound cal development. conducting apparatus in vertebrates as The hyoids of the Crocodilia are de- well as of the evolution of the cranial and scribed at some length by Fuirbringer, who the hyobranchial skeleton.) shows that in these reptiles the hyoids con- "Simultaneously the hyoid bone consti- sist of a large corpus, ventrally convex, tutes in various ways the ventral basis from the side of which project large, well- and, when well developed, the support for ossified first ceratobranchials. The corpus the respiratory organs (larynx, i.e., cricoid, is cartilaginous and broader anteriorly with adjacent cartilages, the trachea). than posteriorly. In its dorsal concavity The connection between both is sometimes are the cricoid and arytenoid cartilages. loose, sometimes solid, and it may exist According to Fiirbringer, the existence between hyoid and cricoid or between hyoid of a ceratohyal is not certain in the Croco- and trachea, with all transitions from the dilia. It would seem probable, from the cricoid to the trachea" (Futrbringer, 1922, ontogenetic work of Parker, that it was p. 6). suppressed at an early stage of develcp- For the purpose of orienting ourselves ment. and avoiding a long, detailed discussion, The first ceratobranchial, says Fur- the manner in which the hyoid apparatus bringer, projects from the lateral border of is developed in the modern reptiles may be the corpus and is directed somewhat lat- shown by a diagram in which typical ex- erally and somewhat dorsally. This is a amples of the hyoids in turtles, rhynchoce- very strong, highly ossified element, which phalians, crocodilians, lizards, and snakes often shows, according to the age of the 4 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES [No. 1301 Fig. 2. The hyoid apparatus of Crocodilus porosus. Ventral view, natural size. Abbreviations as in figure 1. animal or the species, a longer or shorter Crocodilia, condensed and paraphrased cartilaginous epiphysis at the free end. above, with a few notes regarding the hy- In young embryos this element is cartilagi- oids of Crocodilus porosus as shown by a nous, but it begins to ossify during embry- specimen at hand. Evidently this came onic life. from a fairly large animal, so that ossifica- The second ceratobranchials are con- tion has proceeded to a considerable extent. tained in the two posterior corners of the The corpus or copula, however, is com- hyoid body or corpus. It might be helpful pletely cartilaginous. It is broad, and its at this place to supplement briefly Fur- lateral edges are extended; these may rep- bringer's remarks as to the hyoids in the resent in part at least the ceratohyals, 19451 HYOID BONES IN PROTOCERATOPS AND PSITTACOSAURUS 5 As Fulrbringer has shown, this is a debatable thickened edge of each bone is the lateral question upon the basis of such evidence as one, and the thin, sinuous curved edge the is now available to us.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Neoceratopsian Dinosaur from the Early Cretaceous of Mongolia And
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01222-7 OPEN A neoceratopsian dinosaur from the early Cretaceous of Mongolia and the early evolution of ceratopsia ✉ Congyu Yu 1 , Albert Prieto-Marquez2, Tsogtbaatar Chinzorig 3,4, Zorigt Badamkhatan4,5 & Mark Norell1 1234567890():,; Ceratopsia is a diverse dinosaur clade from the Middle Jurassic to Late Cretaceous with early diversification in East Asia. However, the phylogeny of basal ceratopsians remains unclear. Here we report a new basal neoceratopsian dinosaur Beg tse based on a partial skull from Baruunbayan, Ömnögovi aimag, Mongolia. Beg is diagnosed by a unique combination of primitive and derived characters including a primitively deep premaxilla with four pre- maxillary teeth, a trapezoidal antorbital fossa with a poorly delineated anterior margin, very short dentary with an expanded and shallow groove on lateral surface, the derived presence of a robust jugal having a foramen on its anteromedial surface, and five equally spaced tubercles on the lateral ridge of the surangular. This is to our knowledge the earliest known occurrence of basal neoceratopsian in Mongolia, where this group was previously only known from Late Cretaceous strata. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that it is sister to all other neoceratopsian dinosaurs. 1 Division of Vertebrate Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York 10024, USA. 2 Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont, ICTA-ICP, Edifici Z, c/de les Columnes s/n Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain. 3 Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. 4 Institute of Paleontology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, ✉ Ulaanbaatar 15160, Mongolia.
    [Show full text]
  • A Battering Ram?
    A Battering Ram? All evidence suggests that Pachycephalosaur skulls were built to withstand extreme forces 9 inches of solid bone Bone organized in a radial arrangement- structural support Articulation btw back of skull and vertebrae oriented to transfer forces linearly Articulation btw back of skull and vertebral column built to withstand sideways forces Vertebral column has tongue and groove articulations Spinal column is an S-shaped shock absorber BUT There is no ‘locking’ mechanism on skull to keep battering heads aligned Some Pachycephalosaurs have imprinted blood vessels on dome These factors suggests that head- butting may not be likely Intraspecies Competition (typically male-male) Females are typically choosey Why? Because they have more to loose Common rule in biology: Females are expensive to lose, males are cheap (e.g. deer hunting) Females choose the male most likely to provide the most successful offspring Males compete with each other for access to female vs. female chooses the strongest male Choosey females // Strong males have more offspring => SEXUAL selection Many ways to do this... But: In general, maximize competition and minimize accidental deaths (= no fitness) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PontCXFgs0M http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1941236/giraffe_fight/ http://www.youtube.com/watch? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYDx1y38vGw http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULRtdk-3Yh4 Air-filled horn cores vs. solid bone skull caps... Gotta have a cheezy animated slide. Homalocephale Pachycephalosaurus Prenocephale Tylocephale Stegoceras Head butting Pachycephalosaurs Bone structure was probably strong enough to withstand collision Convex nature would favor glancing blows Instead, dome and spines seem better suited for “flank butting” So..
    [Show full text]
  • A New Maastrichtian Species of the Centrosaurine Ceratopsid Pachyrhinosaurus from the North Slope of Alaska
    A new Maastrichtian species of the centrosaurine ceratopsid Pachyrhinosaurus from the North Slope of Alaska ANTHONY R. FIORILLO and RONALD S. TYKOSKI Fiorillo, A.R. and Tykoski, R.S. 2012. A new Maastrichtian species of the centrosaurine ceratopsid Pachyrhinosaurus from the North Slope of Alaska. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 57 (3): 561–573. The Cretaceous rocks of the Prince Creek Formation contain the richest record of polar dinosaurs found anywhere in the world. Here we describe a new species of horned dinosaur, Pachyrhinosaurus perotorum that exhibits an apomorphic character in the frill, as well as a unique combination of other characters. Phylogenetic analysis of 16 taxa of ceratopsians failed to resolve relationships between P. perotorum and other Pachyrhinosaurus species (P. canadensis and P. lakustai). P. perotorum shares characters with each of the previously known species that are not present in the other, including very large nasal and supraorbital bosses that are nearly in contact and separated only by a narrow groove as in P. canadensis, and a rostral comb formed by the nasals and premaxillae as in P. lakustai. P. perotorum is the youngest centrosaurine known (70–69 Ma), and the locality that produced the taxon, the Kikak−Tegoseak Quarry, is close to the highest latitude for recovery of ceratopsid remains. Key words: Dinosauria, Centrosaurinae, Cretaceous, Prince Creek Formation, Kikak−Tegoseak Quarry, Arctic. Anthony R. Fiorillo [[email protected]] and Ronald S. Tykoski [[email protected]], Perot Museum of Nature and Science, 2201 N. Field Street, Dallas, TX 75202, USA. Received 4 April 2011, accepted 23 July 2011, available online 26 August 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy, Cranial Morphology, and Relationships of Parrot-Beaked Dinosaurs (Ceratopsia: Psittacosaurus)
    2 Taxonomy, Cranial Morphology, and Relationships of Parrot-Beaked Dinosaurs (Ceratopsia: Psittacosaurus) PAUL C. SERENO in 1922, well-preserved fossils of the first parrot- (Coombs 1980, 1982). For many years, Osborn’s two brief beaked dinosaur were discovered in Early Cretaceous notes on P. mongoliensis (Osborn 1923, 1924) and a descrip- horizons in the Gobi Desert of Mongolia. Now referred to tion of P. sinensis (Young 1958) provided most of the informa- a single species, Psittacosaurus mongoliensis, these remains tion available on psittacosaur morphology. include a growth series from hatchlings to adults. In sub- Recent Work. Sereno (1987) provided an overview of psit- sequent years, 15 species have been added to the genus tacosaur morphology. Portions of this dissertation were pub- Psittacosaurus and a second genus, Hongshanosaurus, was lished, including the description of two new species (P. meiley- recently described, all from Early Cretaceous rocks in ingensis, P. xinjiangensis; Sereno and Zhao 1988; Sereno et al. Asia. Although the second genus and about one-half of 1988), the synonomy of several poorly known species (Sereno the species attributed to Psittacosaurus are potentially in- 1990a), and an overview of the morphology of the clade Psit- valid, Psittacosaurus remains the most species-rich dino- tacosauridae (Sereno 1990b). Although most of this overview saurian genus, with interspecific variation concentrated can be found in You and Dodson (2004), reference is made in the skull and dentition. This paper reviews evidence only to the original source (Sereno 1990b). differentiating the named genera and species of psit- Russian psittacosaurs, including a partial skull first reported tacosaurs, outlines major cranial changes in a growth se- by Rozhdestvensky (1955, 1960) at Shestakovo in Siberia, be- ries from hatchling to adult in Psittacosaurus came the subject of a dissertation by Xijin Zhao under his mongoliensis, and provides evidence of two species direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Body-Size Evolution in the Dinosauria
    8 Body-Size Evolution in the Dinosauria Matthew T. Carrano Introduction The evolution of body size and its influence on organismal biology have received scientific attention since the earliest decades of evolutionary study (e.g., Cope, 1887, 1896; Thompson, 1917). Both paleontologists and neontologists have attempted to determine correlations between body size and numerous aspects of life history, with the ultimate goal of docu- menting both the predictive and causal connections involved (LaBarbera, 1986, 1989). These studies have generated an appreciation for the thor- oughgoing interrelationships between body size and nearly every sig- nificant facet of organismal biology, including metabolism (Lindstedt & Calder, 1981; Schmidt-Nielsen, 1984; McNab, 1989), population ecology (Damuth, 1981; Juanes, 1986; Gittleman & Purvis, 1998), locomotion (Mc- Mahon, 1975; Biewener, 1989; Alexander, 1996), and reproduction (Alex- ander, 1996). An enduring focus of these studies has been Cope’s Rule, the notion that body size tends to increase over time within lineages (Kurtén, 1953; Stanley, 1973; Polly, 1998). Such an observation has been made regarding many different clades but has been examined specifically in only a few (MacFadden, 1986; Arnold et al., 1995; Jablonski, 1996, 1997; Trammer & Kaim, 1997, 1999; Alroy, 1998). The discordant results of such analyses have underscored two points: (1) Cope’s Rule does not apply universally to all groups; and (2) even when present, size increases in different clades may reflect very different underlying processes. Thus, the question, “does Cope’s Rule exist?” is better parsed into two questions: “to which groups does Cope’s Rule apply?” and “what process is responsible for it in each?” Several recent works (McShea, 1994, 2000; Jablonski, 1997; Alroy, 1998, 2000a, 2000b) have begun to address these more specific questions, attempting to quantify patterns of body-size evolution in a phylogenetic (rather than strictly temporal) context, as well as developing methods for interpreting the resultant patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaur Warriors
    Dinosaur Warriors Dinosaur Take a step back in time to explore all things dinosaur—from fossil hunters to baby dinosaurs! Read all the books in this series: Owen DROPCAP by Ruth Owen [Intentionally Left Blank] DROPCAP DROPCAPby Ruth Owen Consultant: Dougal Dixon, Paleontologist Member of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology United Kingdom Credits Cover, © James Kuether; 4–5, © James Kuether; 6–7, © James Kuether; 8, © The Natural History Museum/Alamy; 9, © James Kuether; 10–11, © James Kuether; 10B, © Christophe Hendrickx; 12–13, © James Kuether; 14, © The Natural History Museum/Alamy; 15, © James Kuether; 16, © David A. Burnham; 17, © John Weinstein/Field Museum/Getty Images; 18, © James Kuether; 19, © Andrey Gudkov/Dreamstime; 20, © Gaston Design Inc./Robert Gaston/www.gastondesign. com; 21, © Stocktrek Images Inc/Alamy; 22T, © W. Scott McFill/Shutterstock; 22B, © James Kuether; 23T, © Edward Ionescu/Dreamstime; 23B, © benedek/Istock Photo. Publisher: Kenn Goin Senior Editor: Joyce Tavolacci Creative Director: Spencer Brinker Image Researcher: Ruth Owen Books Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Owen, Ruth, 1967– author. Title: Dinosaur warriors / by Ruth Owen. Description: New York, New York : Bearport Publishing, [2019] | Series: The dino-sphere | Includes bibliographical references and index. DROPCAP Identifiers: LCCN 2018049812 (print) | LCCN 2018053176 (ebook) | ISBN 9781642802566 (Ebook) | ISBN 9781642801873 (library) Subjects: LCSH: Dinosaurs—Juvenile literature. Classification: LCC QE861.5 (ebook) | LCC QE861.5 .O8456 2019 (print) | DDC 567.9—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018049812 Copyright © 2019 Ruby Tuesday Books. Published in the United States by Bearport Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in whole or in part, stored in any retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Late Inner Mongolia
    bulletin de l'institut royal des sciences naturelles de belgique sciences de la terre, 71-supp.: 5-28, 2001 bulletin van het koninklijk belgisch instituut voor natuurwetenschappen aardwetenschappen, 71-supp.: 5-28, 2001 A new Species of Protoceratops (Dinosauria, Neoceratopsia) from the Late Cretaceous of Inner Mongolia (P. R. China)1 Olivier LAMBERT, Pascal GODEFROIT, Hong LI, Chang-Young SHANG & Zhi-Ming DONG Lambert, O., Godefroit, P., Li, H., Shang, C.-Y, & Dong, Mots-clefs: Neoceratopsia, Protoceratops, Crétacé supérieur, Z.-M., 2001. - A new Species of Protoceratops (Dinosauria, Mongolie intérieure, phylogénie. Neoceratopsia) from the Late Cretaceous of Inner Mongolia (P. R. China). Bulletin de l'Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Introduction Sciences de la Terre, Supplement 71: 05-28, 4 pis., 13 fïgs., 2 tables; Bruxelles - Brussel, December 15, 2001. - ISSN 0374-6291. Protoceratops is probably the most emblematic dinosaur from the Gobi Desert. The first specimen was discovered Abstract in the Djadokhta Formation (Campanian) at the legendary Flaming Cliffs (Bayn Dzak, P. R. Mongolia) by the Third The basai neoceratopsian dinosaur Protoceratops hellenikorhinus nov. Central Asiatic Expédition of the AMNH on September sp. is described on the basis of material discovered by the Sino-Belgian 2, 1922 (Andrews, 1932). This skull (AMNH 6251) of a Expéditions in Inner Mongolia, in Campanian (Upper Cretaceous) deposits at Bayan Mandahu (Inner Mongolia, P.R. China). This new juvénile individual, lacking the front of the face and the species is characterised by its large size and by a series of cranial frill, was described as Protoceratops andrewsi Granger autapomorphies linked to the important development of the mandibu- & Gregory, 1923.
    [Show full text]
  • Bristle-Like Integumentary Structures at the Tail of the Horned Dinosaur Psittacosaurus
    Naturwissenschaften (2002) 89:361–365 DOI 10.1007/s00114-002-0339-6 SHORT COMMUNICATION Gerald Mayr · D. Stefan Peters · Gerhard Plodowski Olaf Vogel Bristle-like integumentary structures at the tail of the horned dinosaur Psittacosaurus Received: 20 December 2001 / Accepted: 26 May 2002 / Published online: 17 July 2002 © Springer-Verlag 2002 Abstract A specimen of the horned dinosaur Psittaco- in China has attracted much recent attention (Buffetaut saurus from the early Cretaceous of China is described 2001; Dalton 2001a, b; Stokstad 2001), because psittaco- in which the integument is extraordinarily well-pre- saurs rank among the Ceratopsia (horned dinosaurs), served. Most unusual is the presence of long bristle-like which occupy a phylogenetic position far removed from structures on the proximal part of tail. We interpret these theropod dinosaurs (Sereno 1990, 1999). Here we give a structures as cylindrical and possibly tubular epidermal first formal description of these structures. structures that were anchored deeply in the skin. They We are aware of the controversial debate concerning might have been used in display behavior and especially the legal ownership of this and other Chinese fossils if one assumes that they were colored, they may have (Dalton 2001a). However, arrangements concerning its had a signal function. At present, there is no convincing repatriation to China have not yet proved successful evidence which shows these structures to be homologous (Dalton 2001a), and this important specimen was ac- to the structurally different integumentary filaments of quired in order to prevent its sale into private hands and theropod dinosaurs. Independent of their homology, how- to ensure its availability for future scientific examination.
    [Show full text]
  • Brusatte Triceratops
    Media Inquiries: Kristin Elise Phillips, Department of Communications March 2009 212-496-3419; [email protected] www.amnh.org _____________________________________________________________________________ WAS TRICERATOPS A SOCIAL ANIMAL? YES, ACCORDING TO A NEW FOSSIL DISCOVERY IN MONTANA’S HOMER SITE Until now, Triceratops was thought to be unusual among its ceratopsid relatives. While many ceratopsids—a common group of herbivorous dinosaurs that lived toward the end of the Cretaceous—have been found in enormous bonebed deposits of multiple individuals, all known Triceratops (over 50 in total) fossils have been solitary individuals. But a new discovery of a jumble of at least three juveniles the badlands of the north-central United States suggests that the three-horned dinosaurs were not only social animals, but may have exhibited unique gregarious groupings of juveniles. “This is very thrilling,” says Stephen Brusatte, an affiliate of the American Museum of Natural History and a doctoral student at Columbia University. “We can say something about how these dinosaurs lived. Interestingly, what we’ve found seems to be a larger pattern among many dinosaurs that juveniles lived and traveled together in groups.” In 2005, Brusatte and colleagues found and excavated a site that contained multiple Triceratops juveniles in 66-million-year-old rocks in southeastern Montana. The geological evidence suggests that at least three juveniles were deposited at the same time by a localized flood, and this suggests that they were probably living together when disaster struck. This find indicates that Triceratops juveniles congregated in small herds, a social behavior increasingly identified in other dinosaur groups, such as Psittacosaurus, a small cousin of Triceratops that lived in Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Bone Histology of Protoceratops Andrewsi from the Late Cretaceous of Mongolia and Its Biological Implications
    Bone histology of Protoceratops andrewsi from the Late Cretaceous of Mongolia and its biological implications ŁUCJA FOSTOWICZ-FRELIK and JUSTYNA SŁOWIAK Fostowicz-Frelik, Ł. and Słowiak, J. 2018. Bone histology of Protoceratops andrewsi from the Late Cretaceous of Mon- golia and its biological implications. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 63 (3): 503–517. Protoceratops andrewsi is one of the best known and abundant ornithischian dinosaurs from the Djadokhta Formation (Late Cretaceous, Mongolia) and a subject of many morphological studies. Here we present the first study of its bone tissue (from the long bones, frill, and rib), describing microstructure, extent of remodeling, and growth tempo changes in ontogeny. Several specimens representing juvenile, subadult, and adult age stages have been studied. In general, paleohistology of Protoceratops is quite uniform throughout ontogeny, showing basic fibrolamellar bone complex with prevalence of woven-fibered bone and scarce remodeling. In adults the parallel-fibered bone matrix forms distinct al- though irregular zonation in the cortex until dominating it. The bone displays noteworthy abundance of fossilized fibers (including Sharpey’s fibers), which apparently strengthen the tissue and enhance its elasticity. Growth tempo increased in the studied femora of Protoceratops at the subadult stage, which suggests changes in bone proportions (i.e., elongation of the hind limbs) in a similar manner as it was observed in a more basal Psittacosaurus. Key words: Dinosauria, Ornithischia, Ceratopsia, paleohistology, ontogeny, growth tempo, Cretaceous, Mongolia. Łucja Fostowicz-Frelik [[email protected]], Institute of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warsaw, Poland; and Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Pale- ontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, People’s Republic of China.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Ceratopsian Dental Microstructure David Kay
    Florida State University Libraries Honors Theses The Division of Undergraduate Studies 2014 Evolution of Ceratopsian Dental Microstructure David Kay Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES EVOLUTION OF CERATOPSIAN DENTAL MICROSTRUCTURE By David Kay A Thesis submitted to the Department of Biological Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with Honors in the Major Degree Awarded: Summer, 2014 1 The members of the Defense Committee approve the thesis of David Kay defended on April 21st, 2014. ______________________________ Professor Gregory M. Erickson Thesis Director ______________________________ Professor William C. Parker Outside Committee Member ______________________________ Professor Scott J. Steppan Committee Member 2 Acknowledgements To be brutally honest, I almost didn’t write this section because I figured that as an undergraduate thesis that there didn’t need to be one; then I realized that by trivializing this I in effect trivialize all the time and guidance that people have given to me. First and foremost I need to thank Greg Erickson for all that he has done for me, including but not limited to: letting me into his reading group, letting me work in the lab, giving me spectacular advice on how to pursue a career in the paleo world, and being a top-notch mentor to a guy with a few screws loose. I would also like to thank Dr. Steppan, whose comments and advise are always amazing and make whatever I’m writing at least five times better. Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Transitional Evolutionary Forms in Chasmosaurine Ceratopsid Dinosaurs: Evidence from the Campanian of New Mexico
    Transitional evolutionary forms in chasmosaurine ceratopsid dinosaurs: evidence from the Campanian of New Mexico Denver W. Fowler1,2 and Elizabeth A. Freedman Fowler1,2,3 1 Badlands Dinosaur Museum, Dickinson Museum Center, Dickinson, ND, USA 2 Museum of the Rockies, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA 3 Department of Natural Sciences, Dickinson State University, Dickinson, ND, USA ABSTRACT Three new chasmosaurines from the Kirtland Formation (~75.0–73.4 Ma), New Mexico, form morphological and stratigraphic intermediates between Pentaceratops (~74.7–75 Ma, Fruitland Formation, New Mexico) and Anchiceratops (~72–71 Ma, Horseshoe Canyon Formation, Alberta). The new specimens exhibit gradual enclosure of the parietal embayment that characterizes Pentaceratops, providing support for the phylogenetic hypothesis that Pentaceratops and Anchiceratops are closely related. This stepwise change of morphologic characters observed in chasmosaurine taxa that do not overlap stratigraphically is supportive of evolution by anagenesis. Recently published hypotheses that place Pentaceratops and Anchiceratops into separate clades are not supported. This phylogenetic relationship demonstrates unrestricted movement of large-bodied taxa between hitherto purported northern and southern provinces in the late Campanian, weakening support for the hypothesis of extreme faunal provincialism in the Late Cretaceous Western Interior. Subjects Evolutionary Studies, Paleontology Submitted 20 November 2019 Keywords Dinosaur, Cretaceous, Pentaceratops, Anchiceratops, Ceratopsidae, Chasmosaurinae, Accepted 7 May 2020 Anagenesis, Diversity Published 5 June 2020 Corresponding author INTRODUCTION Denver W. Fowler, [email protected] Intermediate or “transitional” fossils are an expected product of evolution, and are Academic editor especially celebrated when they occur within major evolutionary transitions (Anderson & Fabien Knoll Sues, 2007; Wellnhofer, 2010; Daeschler, Shubin & Jenkins, 2006).
    [Show full text]