DOCSLIB.ORG

Mcneill, Peter G. B. (1960) the Jurisdiction of the Scottish Privy Council, 1532-1708

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mcneill, Peter G. B. (1960) the Jurisdiction of the Scottish Privy Council, 1532-1708 McNeill, Peter G. B. (1960) The jurisdiction of the Scottish Privy Council, 1532-1708. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/3029/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the Author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] THESIS presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Glasgow 1960 THE JU1ISDICTION OF THE SCOTTISH PRIVY COUNCIL 1532 - 1708 submitted by Peter GB McNeill MA LIB Advocate 1ý, Edinburgh: 1960 BEST COPY AVAILABLE Variable print quality BEST COPY AVAILABLE TEXT IN ORIGINAL IS CLOSETO THE EDGE OF THE PAGE THE JURISDICTION OF THE SCOTTISH PRIVY COUNCIL 1532 - 1708 To MFM Acknowledgements My thanks are due to the librarians and staff of National Library of Scotland, Advocates Library., Signet Library, the Historical Department of IHY.Register House and the Library of Edinburgh University, and in particular to Dr hcIrmes, Dr Malcolm and Mr Brashaw for their kind assistance and advice. I also received much encouragement and guidance from Mr G. Campbell H. Paton, Advocate. My thanks are also due to biss M. Deas and Miss R. Hope for typing the work. CONTENTS List of Abbreviations j,. PREFACE -jai I fl TRODUCTION I 1. The Problem I II THE COUITCII, AS ACOURT 3 2. The Organization of the Court 3 Dritten constitutions 5 Vacation 6 Meetings: day, time, place 6 Councillors: qualification 9 Appointment 10 Tenure 11 Remuneration 11 Immunities 12 Representation of parties 12 Clerk of Council 14 Signets 15 Macer 16 Records 17 Registration 18 3o Functioning of the Court 19 Composition 19 Ordinary councillors 19 Extraordinary councillors 21 An undivided court 23 Quorum 24 Declinature 25 Letters 25 SiCnatures 26 Warrants 27 Judicial decisions 27 Individual councillors as judges 28 Consolidation of council 28 V III JURISDICTION: GENERAL 30 4.. General 30 Territorial 30 Over persons 30 5. Tribunal of Conflicts 32 Church and state 33 Andrew Melville 34 General Assembly of 1605 35 6o Subject Matter 37 IV JUPISDIC L IO : ADL.MISTRATION 38 7. Civil Administration 33 Trade regulation 38 Administrative law 42 Disputes within the administration 42 Complaints against the administration 43 Burghs 45 8o Administration of Justice 1+7 Commissions 49 Interference 50 Precognition 51 Super inquirendis 52 Supervision 53 Petition and direction 53 Assistance to inferior courts 52+ Redress 51+ Disciplining judges 55- Partial Assize 56 Exemption 57 Jurisdictional disputes: competencsy 58 Church courts 60 Patronage 62 Conflicting jurisdictions 63 Court of session 65 9. Appeals 66 No appeals on merits 66 Suspension 66 Reduction 67 Advocation 67 vi 68 V JURISDICTION: EQUITY 10. Privileged Causes 70 King's causes 70 Revenue 71 Churchmen 72 Women and children 73 Sequestration of pupils 73 Other matters 76 Insanity 77 Consistorial matters 78 Aliment 79 81 Poor persons Kindly tenants 83 Strangers 85 Conflict of laws 89 Nationality 91 11. Eui 92 Nobile of ficium 92 Interponing authority 92 Approbation 93 Approval of schemes 94 Patents 97 Acts of Grace 99 12, Prerogative of Mercy 100 Suspension 100 Supersedere 102 Liberation 103 Civil imprisonment 103 Criminal imprisonment 106 VI JURISDICTION: PE.&CE 109 13, h1aintenance of Peace 109 Feud 109 Lawburrows 110 14.. Civil and Criminal. Liability 112 Personal liability 112 Vicarious liability: general band 112 Other liabilities 113 vii 15, Riot and Oppression: criminal aspect 115 Hagbuts and pistols 116 Defences 118 Remit to the ordinary 119 Puni shrient 121 16, Civil Aspects of Riot Reparation: damages for personal injuries 123 Slaughter: assythment: remission 121 Defamation 125 Abuse of process 126 17, Wrongs to Property 127 Heritage 127 Teinds 129 Movables 130 Remit to the ordinary 131 18. Liability Ex delicto Delict 133 Negligence 133 Damnom sine iniuria 135 Damages 135 Fines 136 19. Res iudicata 138 Decree in absence 138 Both parties present 139 Effect of decree 139 20. Horning 141 Criminal and civil horning 11+1 Horning in the council 112 Effect of rebellion 143 21. Can 1! 4 Contempt of the king's authority 144 Execution 145 The Guard 145 Tolbooths 146 Private pursuers 147 Public interest 147 Cessation of captions 11F8 viii 22, Escheat 149 Regranting of escheats 11+9 Incidental disputes 150 Remit 151 Punishment 152 VII PROCEDURE 151 230 Supplication 154 24, Process 157 Letters 157 Citation 158 Pererrptory diets 159 Process 160 Consent 161 25. Probation 162 Writ 162 Oath: oath of calumny 162 Oath of verity 163 Oath de iuramento 163 Witnesses 164 Probation in absence 165 26. Quality of Proof 166 27. Expenses and Fees 167 Expenses 167 Fees 170 VIII DEMISE OF THE COUNCIL 171 Act of 1707 and after 171 Riots 172 Equity and administrative law 172 IX CONCLUSION 176 APPENDICES A Constitutional documents of the privy council, 1532-1707 178 B Commission of the privy council, 1626 179 C Privy Council in 17 century 183 Comparison D between the privy council and court of session: organization and function 185 ix E Comparison between privy council and court of session: membership, March 1625 187 F Acts and decrees 189 Cr Master of requests 191 H Petition and direction 192 I Interference with court of session by privy council 195 J Petitions for powers 197 K Church lands after 1560 202 L Form of supplication before the council, 1606 206 M Analysis of bills, July 1607 207 N Forms of deliverance of supplications 209 0 Steps in process, 1686 210 P Public and private prosecution 212 Q The last years of the council 213 BIBLIOGRAIIY LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ADC Acta Dominorun Concilii (Publi. ADC c) Acts of Lords of Council in Public Affairs AJ Act of Adjournal AM Acts of Parliament of Scotland AS Act of Sederunt Balfour Balfour, Sir James, Practicks Bisset Bisset, Habbakuk, Rolement of Courtis BOBO Book of Old Edinburgh Club Botfield Original Letters, Ed. Botfield Breviate Sibbald, A Breviate of the State of Scotland Brunton Brunton & Haig, Senators of the College of Justice BS Books of Sederunt BUK Book of Universall Kirk Calderwood Calderwood, History of the Kirk in Scotland EHR Enali sh Historical Review ER Exchequer Rolls Erskine Erskine, Institute of the Laws of Scotland Hannay Hannay, College of Justice HMJ Historical Manuscripts Coaanission Home MSS David Milne Home Manuscripts Hope Sir Thomas Hope, Major Practicks Hume Crimes Hume, Commentaries respecting Crimes JR Juridical Review Keith Keith, Affairs of Church and State in Scotland Knox Knox, Works Letters Letters and State Papers of Janes VI xi Mackenzie Mackenzie, Laws and Customs of Scotland in Matters Criminal Criminal Mackenzie Mackenzie, Institutions of the Law of ScotlFmd Institutions McMillan McMillan, Evolution of Scottish Judiciary Mar & Kellie Mar & Kellie Papers Melrose Papers Melrose Papers, Abbotsford Club NIS National Library of Scotland CID Oxford English Dictionary Pitcairn Criminal Trials, Ed. Pitcairn Pitm Pitmedden, Abridtrnent of Books of Sederunt Re iem Regiam Majestatem Register Register of Royal Letters RH H. M. General Register House, Edinburgh RMS Register of Great Seal RPC Register of Privy Council, First Series 2RPC Register of Privy Council, Second Series 3IPC Register of Privy Council, Third Series RSS Register of Secret Seal TA Treasurers Accounts SHR Scottish Historical Review gHS Scottish History Society Skene De Verb Skene, De Verborum Significatione SIjr Scots Law Times Spotswood Spotswood, History of the Church of Scotland Staggering State Scot, Staggering, State of Scottish Statesmen Stair Stair,, Institutions STS Scottish Text Society Sources Sources and Literature of Scots Law PREFACE The main source of this thesis is the Register of the Privy Council, the greater part of which has been in print for almost seventy years during which time it has been the quarry of historians whose interests were primarily 1 political and ecclesiastical. Such legal work as has been done on the council has been largely of a constitutional nature; and the legal interest of non- historians and antiquaries has had a bias towards trials for witchcraft and the persecution of the covenanters - topics which are not of great importance in themselves nor when compared with the huge mass of judicial business which the council transacted; and these topics tend to give a distorted picture of the volume and proportion of that business. The article in Sources and Literature of (Stair Scots Law Society), at page 82, is merely a starting point which, apart from reliance on Mackenzie, only touches on the original jurisdiction of the council before the Restoration. The much shorter paragraph in Introduction to 2 Scottish Legal History, at page 28, is misleading. The Edinburgh University PhD thesis of Mr William Taylor, "The Scottish Privy Council 1603-1625: Its Composition and Work", is chiefly concerned with politics and administration. Apart from the Register, I have relied mostly on the Acts of Parliaments of Scotland,, on the institutional and other writers,, particularly Mackenzie., and on the various collections of royal and other letters which are preserved in the club books. Since the bulk of the sources used are in print the MIS sources have 1. The lack of legal interest is betrayed even in some of the earlier editors of the Register who use "plaintiff" and "defendant" instead of "pursuer" and "defender": RPC iii 443 2. Appendix I xiii been used mainly to supplement them and in the case of the Register to recover information which had been obscured in the process of calendaring.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Legal Terms Used in Scottish Court Procedure, Neil Kelly Partner
    Legal Terms Used in Scottish Court Procedure, Neil Kelly Partner, MacRoberts Many recent reported adjudication decisions have come from the Scottish Courts. Therefore, as part of the case notes update, we have included a brief explanation of some of the Scottish Court procedures. There are noted below certain legal terms used in Scottish Court Procedure with a brief explanation of them. This is done in an attempt to give some readers a better understanding of some of the terms used in the Scottish cases highlighted on this web-site. 1. Action: Legal proceedings before a Court in Scotland initiated by Initial Writ or Summons. 2. Adjustment (of Pleadings): The process by which a party changes its written pleadings during the period allowed by the Court for adjustment. 3. Amendment (of Pleadings): The process by which a party changes its written pleadings after the period for adjustment has expired. Amendment requires leave of the Court. 4. Appeal to Sheriff Principal: In certain circumstances an appeal may be taken from a decision of a Sheriff to the Sheriff Principal. In some cases leave of the Sheriff is required. 5. Appeal to Court of Session: In certain circumstances an appeal may be taken from a decision of a Sheriff directly to the Court of Session or from a decision of the Sheriff Principal to the Court of Session. Such an appeal may require leave of the Sheriff or Sheriff Principal who pronounced the decision. Such an appeal will be heard by the Inner House of the Court of Session. 6. Arrestment: The process of diligence under which a Pursuer (or Defender in a counterclaim) can obtain security for a claim by freezing moveable (personal) property of the debtor in the hands of third parties e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Act of Sederunt (Simple Procedure) 2016 SSI 2016/200
    Act of Sederunt (Simple Procedure) 2016 SSI 2016/200 1. Citation and commencement, etc 2. The Simple Procedure Rules 3. Interpretation of the Simple Procedure Rules 4. Warrants 5. Arrestment to found jurisdiction Citation and commencement, etc 1. (1) This Act of Sederunt may be cited as the Act of Sederunt (Simple Procedure) 2016. (2) It comes into force on 28th November 2016. (3) A certified copy is to be inserted in the Books of Sederunt. The Simple Procedure Rules 2. (1) Schedule 1 contains rules for simple procedure cases and may be cited as the Simple Procedure Rules. (2) A form referred to in the Simple Procedure Rules means— (a) the form with that name in Schedule 2, or (b) an electronic version of the form with that name in Schedule 2, adapted for use by the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service with the portal on its website. (3) Where the Simple Procedure Rules require a form to be used, that form may be varied where the circumstances require it. Interpretation of the Simple Procedure Rules 3. (1) In the Simple Procedure Rules— “a case where the expenses of a claim are capped” means a simple procedure case— (a) to which an order made under section 81(1) of the Courts Reform (Scotland) Act 2014a applies; or (b) in which the sheriff has made a direction under section 81(7) of that Act; [omitted in consequentials] “a decision which absolves the respondent” means a decree of absolvitor; “a decision which orders the respondent to deliver something to the claimant” means a decree for delivery or for recovery of possession; “a decision
    [Show full text]
  • Advocate General Commissioned an Expert Group, Chaired by Sir David Edward, to Examine the Position 1
    Scotland Act 2012 – commencement of provisions relating to Supreme Court appeals Following the coming into force of the Scotland Act 1998, the UK Supreme Court and its predecessors were given a role in determining “devolution issues” arising in court proceedings. Devolution issues under the 1998 Act include questions whether an Act of the Scottish Parliament is within its legislative competence, and whether the purported or proposed exercise of a function by a member of the Scottish Executive would be incompatible with any of the rights under the European Convention on Human Rights or with the law of the European Union. This included the exercise of functions by the Lord Advocate as prosecutor, with the effect that the Supreme Court was given a role defined in statute in relation to Scottish criminal cases for the first time. The Scotland Act 2012 makes substantial amendments to this aspect of the 1998 Act and creates a new scheme of appeals in relation to “compatibility issues”. “Compatibility issues” are questions arising in criminal proceedings about EU law and ECHR issues, or challenges to Acts of the Scottish Parliament on ECHR or EU law compatibility grounds. These issues would currently be dealt with as devolution issues under the regime created by the 1998 Act. Under the 2012 Act provisions, the remit of the UK Supreme Court is to determine the compatibility issue and then remit to the High Court for such further action as that court should see fit. The 2012 Act also imposes time limits in appeals to the Supreme Court in the new system and introduces the same time limit in appeals to the Supreme Court in relation to devolution issues arising in criminal proceedings.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooter & Gell V. Hartmarx Corp., Caveat Advocatus, The
    Valparaiso University Law Review Volume 25 Number 2 Winter 1991 pp.311-330 Winter 1991 Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp., Caveat Advocatus, The Growing Impact of Rule 11 Sanctions Craig K. Van Ess Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Craig K. Van Ess, Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp., Caveat Advocatus, The Growing Impact of Rule 11 Sanctions, 25 Val. U. L. Rev. 311 (1991). Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol25/iss2/6 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Valparaiso University Law School at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Valparaiso University Law Review by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Van Ess: Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp., Caveat Advocatus, The Growing Im NOTE FUNDING INDIANA'S PUBLIC SCHOOLS: A QUESTION OF EQUAL AND ADEQUATE EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY It will be a great day when the Schools get all the money they need and the air force has to hold a bake sale to buy a bomber.' INTRODUCTION Indiana public schools must provide equal and adequate educational opportunity for all the state's children,2 yet Indiana schools face a funding crisis. Indiana has traditionally funded public education at a level below the national average, and the funding gap between Indiana and the national average continues to grow.3 The educational performance of Indiana students also ranks below the national average, despite recent efforts to improve Indiana schools.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles V, Monarchia Universalis and the Law of Nations (1515-1530)
    +(,121/,1( Citation: 71 Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 79 2003 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline Mon Jan 30 03:58:51 2017 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: Copyright Information CHARLES V, MONARCHIA UNIVERSALIS AND THE LAW OF NATIONS (1515-1530) by RANDALL LESAFFER (Tilburg and Leuven)* Introduction Nowadays most international legal historians agree that the first half of the sixteenth century - coinciding with the life of the emperor Charles V (1500- 1558) - marked the collapse of the medieval European order and the very first origins of the modem state system'. Though it took to the end of the seven- teenth century for the modem law of nations, based on the idea of state sover- eignty, to be formed, the roots of many of its concepts and institutions can be situated in this period2 . While all this might be true in retrospect, it would be by far overstretching the point to state that the victory of the emerging sovereign state over the medieval system was a foregone conclusion for the politicians and lawyers of * I am greatly indebted to professor James Crawford (Cambridge), professor Karl- Heinz Ziegler (Hamburg) and Mrs. Norah Engmann-Gallagher for their comments and suggestions, as well as to the board and staff of the Lauterpacht Research Centre for Inter- national Law at the University of Cambridge for their hospitality during the period I worked there on this article.
    [Show full text]
  • 162 INTERNATIONAL LAWYER Long Before the 1957 Law, Indigent
    162 INTERNATIONAL LAWYER Long before the 1957 law, indigent litigants could obtain exemption from judicial fees payable for actions in courts. The presently effective statute, 53 which dates from 1936, is part of the Code of Civil Procedure; it regulates in detail the bases on which an indigent litigant can obtain a waiver of court costs. A person who seeks legal aid either gratuitously or at a reduced rate initiates his request by obtaining from the Municipality a form, which must be filled out personally by the applicant, setting forth the financial situation on which he bases his claim that he is unable to obtain needed assistance via his own resources. Information furnished on the form is checked by the Municipality, and the application is then submitted to the consultation bureau for processing and determination of the legal aid which will be furnished. Information furnished by the applicant is further subject to examination by the court which may seek confirmation of the financial condition alleged from the tax authorities. 2. CRIMINAL MATTERS Counsel has always been available to indigent defendants in criminal matters involving a felony. 154 Within the jurisdiction of each court of first instance, a court-appointed Council for Legal Assistance functions in crim- inal matters, consisting of at least three attorneys. The Council assigns attorneys to indigent defendants in criminal matters as provided in the Code of Criminal Procedure and further as the Council may deem fit. Each defendant in provisional custody must be assigned counsel by the president of the court before which the matter will be adjudicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Act of Adjournal (Criminal Procedure Rules 1996 Amendment) (Approval of Sentencing Guidelines) 2018
    Certified copy from legislation.gov.uk Publishing SCOTTISH STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2018 No. 229 HIGH COURT OF JUSTICIARY Act of Adjournal (Criminal Procedure Rules 1996 Amendment) (Approval of Sentencing Guidelines) 2018 Made - - - - 12th July 2018 Laid before the Scottish Parliament 16th July 2018 Coming into force - - 4th September 2018 The High Court of Justiciary makes this Act of Adjournal under the powers conferred by section 305 of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995( a) and all other powers enabling it to do so. Citation and commencement, etc. 1. —(1) This Act of Adjournal may be cited as the Act of Adjournal (Criminal Procedure Rules 1996 Amendment) (Approval of Sentencing Guidelines) 2018. (2) It comes into force on 4th September 2018. (3) A certified copy is to be inserted in the Books of Adjournal. Amendment of the Criminal Procedure Rules 1996 2. —(1) The Criminal Procedure Rules 1996( b) are amended in accordance with this paragraph. (2) After Chapter 67 (European Investigation Orders)(c) insert— “CHAPTER 68 APPROVAL OF SENTENCING GUIDELINES Interpretation of this Chapter 68.1. In this Chapter “the Council” means the Scottish Sentencing Council within the meaning of section 1 of the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010( d). (a) 1995 c.46. Section 305 was amended by section 111(1) of the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 2016 (asp 1) and by article 2 of S.S.I. 2015/338, and was extended by section 386(3)(a) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (c.29), section 36A(4) of the Serious Crime Act 2007 (c.27), and section 32(5) of the Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 (c.2).
    [Show full text]
  • Act of Sederunt (Summary Applications, Statutory Applications and Appeals Etc
    SCOTTISH STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2019 No. 140 SHERIFF COURT Act of Sederunt (Summary Applications, Statutory Applications and Appeals etc. Rules Amendment) (Labour Market Enforcement Orders) 2019 Made - - - - 17th April 2019 Laid before the Scottish Parliament 18th April 2019 Coming into force - - 18th May 2019 In accordance with section 4 of the Scottish Civil Justice Council and Criminal Legal Assistance Act 2013( a), the Court of Session has approved draft rules submitted to it by the Scottish Civil Justice Council with such modifications as it thinks appropriate. The Court of Session therefore makes this Act of Sederunt under the powers conferred by section 104(1) of the Courts Reform (Scotland) Act 2014( b) and all other powers enabling it to do so. Citation and commencement, etc. 1. —(1) This Act of Sederunt may be cited as the Act of Sederunt (Summary Applications, Statutory Applications and Appeals etc. Rules Amendment) (Labour Market Enforcement Orders) 2019. (2) It comes into force on 18th May 2019. (3) A certified copy is to be inserted in the Books of Sederunt. Amendment of the Summary Application Rules 1999 2. —(1) The Act of Sederunt (Summary Applications, Statutory Applications and Appeals etc. Rules) 1999( c) is amended in accordance with this paragraph. (2) In Part XLIX (illegal working orders)( d)— (a) in the Part heading, after “WORKING” insert “AND LABOUR MARKET ENFORCEMENT”; (b) after rule 3.49.3 (applications for compensation) insert— (a) 2013 asp 3. Section 4 was amended by the Courts Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 (asp 18), schedule 5, paragraph 31(3), and by the Inquiries into Fatal Accidents and Sudden Deaths etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Suppose It to Be So
    188 L A W GLOSSARY. by a fine of twenty-five asses, or pounds of brass. But if the injury was more atrocious, as, for instance, if any one deprived another of the use of a limb, (si membrum rapsit, i. e. ruperit,) he was punished by retaliation, \talione,) if the person injured would not accept of any other satisfaction. If he only dislocated or broke a bone, he paid three hundred asses, if the suffer er was a freeman ; and one hundred and fifty, if a slave. Gell. xx. If any one slandered another by defamatory verses, (si quis aliquem publice diffamas- set, eique adversus bonos mores convicium fecissit,�i. e. "if any one defamed another, or cast reproach on him contrary to good manners or morality ;" " affronted him (vel carmen famosum in eum condidisset)�i. e. made an in famous libel upon him," he was beaten with a club, vid. Hor. Sat. ii. which alludes to the law for this species of libel. But these laws gradually fell into disuse, Gell. xx. ; and by the edicts of the Prcetor, an action was granted on account of ail personal injuries and af fronts only, for a fine, which was proportioned according to the dignity of the person, and the nature of the injury. This, however, being found in sufficient to check licentiousness and insolence, Sulla made a new law con cerning injuries, by which, not only a civil action, but also a criminal prose cution, was appointed for certain offences, with the punishment of exile, or working in the mines.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Data Report: January 2021
    This publication will be available in accessible HTML on the gov.scot website. Justice Analytical Services Coronavirus (COVID-19) Data Report: January 2021 Published 25th February 2021 Summary This pack provides information on the impact of COVID-19 on the Justice system during January 2021. Data has been gathered from a number of different sources and may be subject to future revision. Public compliance This pack includes information on COVID-19 related interventions undertaken by Police Scotland. In addition to this, information on the public’s compliance with measures to help restrict the spread of COVID-19 is collected from surveys of the population. Findings from these surveys can be found in the Public attitudes to Coronavirus: January Update. Claimed compliance was high in November and December. Police activity Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS), Courts & Prisons COPFS greatly reduced the Recorded crime was 6% lower over number of reports awaiting marking April 2020 to January 2021 January 2021. compared to the preceding year. To reduce footfall in lockdown, the The number of incidents remain majority of summary business was below 2020 levels. adjourned on 12th January. Domestic abuse incidents were 4% Community disposals were higher in April 2020 to January returning to 19-20 levels but there 2021 compared to the preceding remains a backlog of cases (and year. associated disposals) to conclude. Coronavirus interventions Initiations and disposals in the civil increased by 43% between court remain below 19-20 levels. December 2020 and January 2021. Prison populations decreased slightly as court business abated. The number of prisoners on remand remain at historically high levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Boys and Girls by Alice Munro
    Boys and Girls by Alice Munro My father was a fox farmer. That is, he raised silver foxes, in pens; and in the fall and early winter, when their fur was prime, he killed them and skinned them and sold their pelts to the Hudson's Bay Company or the Montreal Fur Traders. These companies supplied us with heroic calendars to hang, one on each side of the kitchen door. Against a background of cold blue sky and black pine forests and treacherous northern rivers, plumed adventures planted the flags of England and or of France; magnificent savages bent their backs to the portage. For several weeks before Christmas, my father worked after supper in the cellar of our house. The cellar was whitewashed, and lit by a hundred-watt bulb over the worktable. My brother Laird and I sat on the top step and watched. My father removed the pelt inside-out from the body of the fox, which looked surprisingly small, mean, and rat-like, deprived of its arrogant weight of fur. The naked, slippery bodies were collected in a sack and buried in the dump. One time the hired man, Henry Bailey, had taken a swipe at me with this sack, saying, "Christmas present!" My mother thought that was not funny. In fact she disliked the whole pelting operation--that was what the killing, skinning, and preparation of the furs was called – and wished it did not have to take place in the house. There was the smell. After the pelt had been stretched inside-out on a long board my father scraped away delicately, removing the little clotted webs of blood vessels, the bubbles of fat; the smell of blood and animal fat, with the strong primitive odour of the fox itself, penetrated all parts of the house.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scottish Bar: the Evolution of the Faculty of Advocates in Its Historical Setting, 28 La
    Louisiana Law Review Volume 28 | Number 2 February 1968 The cottS ish Bar: The volutE ion of the Faculty of Advocates in Its Historical Setting Nan Wilson Repository Citation Nan Wilson, The Scottish Bar: The Evolution of the Faculty of Advocates in Its Historical Setting, 28 La. L. Rev. (1968) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol28/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SCOTTISH BAR: THE EVOLUTION OF THE FACULTY OF ADVOCATES IN ITS HISTORICAL SOCIAL SETTING Nan Wilson* Although the expression "advocate" is used in early Scottish statutes such as the Act of 1424, c. 45, which provided for legal aid to the indigent, the Faculty of Advocates as such dates from 1532 when the Court of Session was constituted as a College of Justice. Before this time, though friends of litigants could appear as unpaid amateurs, there had, of course, been professional lawyers, lay and ecclesiastical, variously described as "fore- speakers," procurators and prolocutors. The functions of advo- cate and solicitor had not yet been differentiated, though the notary had been for historical reasons. The law teacher was then essentially an ecclesiastic. As early as 1455, a distinctive costume (a green tabard) for pleaders was prescribed by Act of Parliament.' Between 1496 and 1501, at least a dozen pleaders can be identified as in extensive practice before the highest courts, and procurators appeared regularly in the Sheriff Courts.2 The position of notary also flourished in Scotland as on the Continent, though from 1469 the King asserted the exclusive right to appoint candidates for that branch of legal practice.
    [Show full text]