DOCSLIB.ORG

Vb.Net Obfuscator Free

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vb.Net Obfuscator Free Vb.net obfuscator free click here to download The project logo comes from Legendora Icon by Teekatas Suwannakrua. Maintained and supported by LeXtudio. Project Description Obfuscar is an open www.doorway.ru obfuscator released under MIT license. It provides basic obfuscation features that help secure secrets in www.doorway.ru assembly. Obfuscation Example. Confuser is a protector/obfuscator www.doorway.ru, providing great security www.doorway.ru Applications. Confuser is not being actively maintained. Please use the successor ConfuserEx instead! Features: Anti debugger; Anti memory dumping; Anti decompiler; Prevent any tampering of the assemblies; Encrypt codes. www.doorway.ru is a top-grade obfuscator www.doorway.ru platform, made by people who really care. It helps to www.doorway.ru code and your valuable assets.​Download · ​Features · ​Purchase · ​Support. I have also used the free PreEmptive solution and it works decently to www.doorway.ru assemblies but does have a few drawbacks. (note these drawbacks are limitations of the free version only). 1) No string encryption, so hard coded strings will still show up as plain text to someone sifting through the. Skater is www.doorway.ru freeware obfuscator www.doorway.ru code protector, obfuscator www.doorway.ru NET code protection. The Light Edition is the Free version of www.doorway.ru Obfuscator. You may use www.doorway.ru Obfuscator Light Edition, free of charge, to protect www.doorway.ru applications for both personal and commercial purposes. Skater. Free source code and tutorials for Software developers and Architects.; Updated: 16 Oct back the www.doorway.ru is not free one but they provide trial version so you can check it and compare with others. Permalink NET website, and I want to know how to obfuscate it after publishing it. without breaking it. obfuscator for vb net free download. School Management System School Management System: This School Management System build using www.doorway.ru in Visual Studio. Hello, i must obfuscator a program than i envelope in vb net What obfuscator is good? For example dotfuscator included in vs or other? free?:) Thank www.doorway.ru it possible to obfuscate www.doorway.ru code without it easily. ConfuserEx Link - www.doorway.ru Telerik Decompiler - http://www. Hi everybody, I could not found a very good free c# obfuscator to protect my ".net exe" file. If you suggest a very good free obfuscator, I will be satishfied. Thanks for your answers. [Review] Confuser Is The Best FREE Obfuscator www.doorway.ru General, Tutorials, Visual Basic, Visual Studio Yesterday, we discussed about Obfuscation and Obfuscators. We also told you that Confuser is the best FREE available Obfuscator. Today we are going to review Confuser. Confuser comes with. You'd probably have better luck writing one yourself. Although that's no trivial task, neither is finding a free (and good).NET obfuscator. The quality of obfuscation programs generally is not so great, and the only truly free one (lots of companies shout "FREE!" and then tell you that that actually meant. 8 Ways To Protect And Obfuscate www.doorway.ru Code Against Reverse-Engineering Using Crypto Obfuscator. Introduction. Most www.doorway.ru compilers emit binary programs containing native CPU instructions which are very hard to disassemble, decompile and reverse-engineer. However, www.doorway.ru compilers such as C#, www.doorway.ru NET applications. www.doorway.ru obfuscator combines a complex approach to protection, easy adjustment and access according to SaaS model which enables to decrease the expenses on your intellectual property protection. We applied the following principle in the process of development: "The user should never put his/her. Microsoft's Visual Studio product has been offering its own third-party obfuscation tool for quite some time now in the form of “Dotfuscator Community Edition”. This add-on is completely free as well as just about completely worthless. If you look up the specifications for this edition you will find that it provides. Net obfuscation was essential: decompiling code was easy, and you could go from assembly, to IL, to C# code and have it compiled again with very little effort. Now www.doorway.ru I'm not at all . If your looking for a free one you could try DotObfuscator Community Edition that comes with Visual Studio or www.doorway.ru Searching for the www.doorway.ru obfuscator tool ever? The best www.doorway.ru code protection solution. Get Started for Free · Learn more. Watch Video. www.doorway.ru obfuscation process. There are a number of tools available that accomplish just that with relative ease. Obfuscation is not somethings that can be done like writing www.doorway.ru program and many developers have to rely on an obfuscation tool to protection their applications and hopefully this knowledge share will help them to protect. The Light version is the Free edition of www.doorway.ru Obfuscator. The protection tool has been developed to assist you stand www.doorway.ru apps when sending them to other users for both commercial and personal usages. www.doorway.ru Obfuscator executes all popular software protection innovations and obfuscation techniques. Code protection - Obfuscation,.NET tools category. Built www.doorway.ru 2, Built for Silverlight, Built for the Compact Framework, Add-in, Free or free version available Decompiler: decompilation/disassembling for IL (same functionality as Microsoft's ILDASM utility), C#, C++, www.doorway.ru, J#; A visual decompiler allows the user to. NET Reactor is a www.doorway.ru Code Protection & Software Licensing System. Protect, encrypt, obfuscate, merge and license www.doorway.ru assemblies. Open source obfuscation tool www.doorway.ru assemblies. Contribute to obfuscar development by creating an account on GitHub. See how APIs, libraries, frameworks, and 3rd www.doorway.ru code really work with the www.doorway.ru decompiler www.doorway.ru Reflector. Runs as a Visual Studio add-in. Want to www.doorway.ru code from reverse engineering? Obfuscation is the www.doorway.ru article list out some best free obfuscator to www.doorway.ru assemblies. You put all your effort and time to create an www.doorway.ru application. But using disassemblers any one can easily generate full source code of your application from the. Protect www.doorway.ru assembly exe www.doorway.ru obfuscator www.doorway.ru code protector, www.doorway.ru www.doorway.ru c# www.doorway.ru obfuscate Rustemsoft proposes www.doorway.ru Obfuscator, an obfuscation tool www.doorway.ru code protection. It implements all known software protection techniques and obfuscation algorithms. You need to. Rustemsoft LLC's www.doorway.ru obfuscator has been expanded in the midst www.doorway.ru assembly browser and decompiler interface that alters executable files .EXE www.doorway.ru) commencing Intermediate Language (IL, MSIL, CIL) double format to high-level source codes, such as C# and Visual www.doorway.ru Come again? to do if you. NET Obfuscator | Protect www.doorway.ru code www.doorway.ru Obfuscator. Dotfuscator is a tool that hinders reverse engineering and tampering www.doorway.ru, Xamarin and Universal Windows Platform applications. It implements a combination of code obfuscation, optimization, shrinking, and hardening technologies. A free version of www.doorway.ru Obfuscator, called the Dotfuscator Community Edition. {mrec_postbit} Does anybody know if, somewhere on the Internet, you can find a free code obfuscator for www.doorway.ru executables? The reason why I'd like to. NET assembly browser and decompiler interface: Construction browsing; Decompilation to IL; C# Disassembly; Visual Basic Disassembly; Shows XML contents; Shows XAML (BAML) NET obfuscator include the effusive functional. www.doorway.ru assembly decompiler and browser Refractor www.doorway.ru dll/exe obfuscation. NET obfuscator include the fully www.doorway.ru code browser interface. www.doorway.ru assembly browser is free developer productivity tool designed to enable www.doorway.ru assembly browsing and It can be used to effectively convert source code between C# and VB. It can also be used to find assembly. NET obfuscator; nearly fifteen years later, Dotfuscator has grown beyond just obfuscation to become the www.doorway.ru protection tool We are pleased to announce that Visual Studio honors the tradition set by its predecessors and ships with a free copy of Dotfuscator Community Edition. Obfuscated code is source or machine code that has been made difficult to understand. in other words its a way to encode the source code that would not be easy to decode. there is a famous free tool www.doorway.ru reflector which give the possibility to open compiled DLL or even EXE files www.doorway.ru project and see the source. Visual Studio Decompiler - www.doorway.ru obfuscator has been expanded www.doorway.ru assembly browser and decompiler interface that converts executable files .EXE www.doorway.ru) from Intermediate Language (IL, MSIL, CIL) binary format to high-level source codes, such as C# and www.doorway.ru www.doorway.ru Obfuscator Standard. www.doorway.ru Obfuscator is an obfuscation tool www.doorway.ru code protection. software protection techniques and obfuscation algorithms. www.doorway.ru Obfuscator is a comprehensive professional solution www.doorway.ru application Price: $ / Shareware. obfuscator. From LogicNP Software: Crypto Obfuscator www.doorway.ru provides superior code protection, obfuscation, optimization and automatic exception reporting for www.doorway.ru assemblies. Crypto Obfuscator combines powerful obfuscation, encryption and optimization techniques to provide the very best protection to www.doorway.ru code against. Most obfuscation tools available www.doorway.ru are commercial (a list can be found here), though there are some free alternatives available. Most obfuscation tools can apply some combination of the following transforms: Renaming. Renames functions, classes, etc. Encryption of strings, code, and resources. www.doorway.ruator is designed to www.doorway.ru assemblies into the form which is hard to read after de-compiling to the languages like C# or www.doorway.ru It obfuscate name of the classes, fields, methods and other elements, which aren't a public.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Programmer's Guide to C
    Download from Wow! eBook <www.wowebook.com> For your convenience Apress has placed some of the front matter material after the index. Please use the Bookmarks and Contents at a Glance links to access them. Contents at a Glance Preface ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� xxv About the Author ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� xxvii About the Technical Reviewer ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������� xxix Acknowledgments ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� xxxi Introduction ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� xxxiii ■■Chapter 1: C# and the .NET Runtime and Libraries �����������������������������������������������������1 ■■Chapter 2: C# QuickStart and Developing in C# ����������������������������������������������������������3 ■■Chapter 3: Classes 101 ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������11 ■■Chapter 4: Base Classes and Inheritance ������������������������������������������������������������������19 ■■Chapter 5: Exception Handling ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������33 ■■Chapter 6: Member Accessibility and Overloading ���������������������������������������������������47 ■■Chapter 7: Other Class Details �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������57
    [Show full text]
  • Bypassing Web Application Firewalls
    Bypassing Web Application Firewalls Pavol Lupták [email protected] CEO, Nethemba s.r.o Abstract The goal of the presentation is to describe typical obfuscation attacks that allow an attacker to bypass standard security measures such as various input filters, output encoding mechanisms used in web-based intrusion detection systems (IDS), intrusion prevention systems (IPS) and web application firewalls (WAFs). These attacks may include different networking tricks, polymorphic shellcode and various code techniques. At the beginning we analyse and compare different HTML parsing and interpretation approaches used by most-common browsers that can lead to unique attack vectors. Javascript, with a full range of features, represents another effective way that can be used to obfuscate or de-obfuscate code – some existing obfuscation tools are mentioned. We describe how it is possible to construct “non-alphanumeric Javascript code” which does not contain alphabetic or numeric characters, but still can contain malicious executable code. Despite the fact that most current applications are immune to SQL injection attacks, it is still possible to find many vulnerable applications. We focus on different fuzzy techniques (and useful open source SQL injection tools that implement them) which can still be used to bypass weak input validation controls. We conclude our presentation with a demonstration of the most basic obfuscation techniques that can be successfully used to bypass traditional web application firewalls (WAFs). Finally, we briefly describe current mitigation techniques that are recommended for efficient malicious Javascript code analysis and sanitizing user input containing untrusted code. Keywords: WAF, IPS, IDS, obfuscation, SQL injection, XSS, CSS, CSRF.
    [Show full text]
  • C++11 Metaprogramming Applied to Software Obfuscation
    C++11 METAPROGRAMMING APPLIED TO SOFTWARE OBFUSCATION SEBASTIEN ANDRIVET About me ! Senior Security Engineer at SCRT (Swiss) ! CTO at ADVTOOLS (Swiss) Sebastien ANDRIVET Cyberfeminist & hacktivist Reverse engineer Intel & ARM C++, C, Obj-C, C# developer Trainer (iOS & Android appsec) PROBLEM Reverse engineering • Reverse engineering of an application if often like following the “white rabbit” • i.e. following string literals • Live demo • Reverse engineering of an application using IDA • Well-known MDM (Mobile Device Management) for iOS A SOLUTION OBFUSCATION What is Obfuscation? Obfuscator O O ( ) = YES! It is also Katy Perry! • (almost) same semantics • obfuscated Obfuscation “Deliberate act of creating source or machine code difficult for humans to understand” – WIKIPEDIA, APRIL 2014 C++ templates OBJECT2 • Example: Stack of objects OBJECT1 • Push • Pop Without templates Stack singers; class Stack { singers.push(britney); void push(void* object); void* pop(); }; Stack apples; apples.push(macintosh); • Reuse the same code (binary) singers apples • Only 1 instance of Stack class With C++ templates template<typename T > Stack<Singer> singers; class Stack singers.push(britney); { void push(T object); T pop(); Stack<Apple> apples; }; apples.push(macintosh); With C++ templates Stack<Singer> singers; singers.push(britney); Stack<Singers> Stack<Apples*> Stack<Apple> apples; apples.push(macintosh); singers apples C++ templates • Two instances of Stack class • One per type • Does not reuse code • By default • Permit optimisations based on types • For ex. reuse code for all pointers to objects • Type safety, verified at compile time Type safety • singers.push(apple); // compilation error Optimisation based on types • Generate different code based on types (template parameters) template<typename T> class MyClass • Example: enable_if { ..
    [Show full text]
  • Code Review Guide
    CODE REVIEW GUIDE 3.0 RELEASE Project leaders: Mr. John Doe and Jane Doe Creative Commons (CC) Attribution Free Version at: https://www.owasp.org 1 2 F I 1 Forward - Eoin Keary Introduction How to use the Code Review Guide 7 8 10 2 Secure Code Review 11 Framework Specific Configuration: Jetty 16 2.1 Why does code have vulnerabilities? 12 Framework Specific Configuration: JBoss AS 17 2.2 What is secure code review? 13 Framework Specific Configuration: Oracle WebLogic 18 2.3 What is the difference between code review and secure code review? 13 Programmatic Configuration: JEE 18 2.4 Determining the scale of a secure source code review? 14 Microsoft IIS 20 2.5 We can’t hack ourselves secure 15 Framework Specific Configuration: Microsoft IIS 40 2.6 Coupling source code review and penetration testing 19 Programmatic Configuration: Microsoft IIS 43 2.7 Implicit advantages of code review to development practices 20 2.8 Technical aspects of secure code review 21 2.9 Code reviews and regulatory compliance 22 5 A1 3 Injection 51 Injection 52 Blind SQL Injection 53 Methodology 25 Parameterized SQL Queries 53 3.1 Factors to Consider when Developing a Code Review Process 25 Safe String Concatenation? 53 3.2 Integrating Code Reviews in the S-SDLC 26 Using Flexible Parameterized Statements 54 3.3 When to Code Review 27 PHP SQL Injection 55 3.4 Security Code Review for Agile and Waterfall Development 28 JAVA SQL Injection 56 3.5 A Risk Based Approach to Code Review 29 .NET Sql Injection 56 3.6 Code Review Preparation 31 Parameter collections 57 3.7 Code Review Discovery and Gathering the Information 32 3.8 Static Code Analysis 35 3.9 Application Threat Modeling 39 4.3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Software Protection Through Obfuscation
    This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Software protection through obfuscation Balachandran, Vivek 2014 Balachandran, V. (2015). Software protection through obfuscation. Doctoral thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/62930 https://doi.org/10.32657/10356/62930 Downloaded on 02 Oct 2021 00:34:50 SGT Software Protection through Obfuscation School of Computer Engineering A Thesis Submitted to the Nanyang Technological University in partial fulfillment of the requirement of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Vivek Balachandran under the supervision of Prof. Ng Wee Keong and Prof. Sabu Emmanuel 2015 2 Acknowledgments Foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisors Prof. Sabu Em- manuel and Prof. Ng Wee Keong for the continuous support of my Ph.D study and research, for their patience, motivation, enthusiasm, and immense knowledge. I thank my fellow labmates in Nanyang Technological University, Singapore: Shaheen Ansari, Deepak Subrmanyam, Chia Tee Kiah for their kind support. Many friends have helped me stay sane through these difficult years. Their support and care helped me overcome setbacks and stay focused on my graduate study. I would like to thank Aditya Venkataraman, Chitra Panchapakesan, Ganesh Bharadwaj, Girid- haran Karunagaran, Karthik Raveendran, Manaswini Ramkumar, Manisha Mujumdar, Nirnaya Sarangan, Ponnu Jacob, Roshan Wahab, Shubha Nageswaran,Vidhi Patel and Vipin Pillai for making my life wonderful as a grad student. Last but not the least, I would like to thank my family: my parents G. Balachandran and V. Santhakumari, and my brother Vishakh Balachandran who were always there for me.
    [Show full text]
  • 6.858 Final Project
    6.858 Final Project Predrag Gruevski Paul Hemberger Andres Romero Albert Wu Introduction Since remote desktop applications are such powerful tools for controlling computers from across the Internet, it stands to reason that adversaries would be motivated to discover and exploit vulnerabilities in such software. In our final project, we explored many of the most popular remote desktop applications for Android clients. Most of them provide little to no security, and we were able to easily create exploits to compromise the keyboard and mouse of the remote machine. Methods We looked at the following popular Android clients (each has at least 100,000 installs on the Google Play app market): 1. TeamViewer for Remote Control 2. Air HID 3. Remote Mouse 4. WiFi Mouse 5. Android Mouse and Keyboard 6. Mobile Mouse Lite 7. Remote Control Collection We installed each of the above clients on an Android phone and the corresponding server on a remote machine running Windows, OS X, or Linux. We used two types of tools for reverse engineering the messaging protocols: 1. Wireshark ­ Wireshark is a network protocol analyzer. Using Wireshark, we were able to analyze incoming and outgoing packets from the remote machine. This was extremely useful for applications using plaintext protocols. 2. Decompilers ­ Tools like Java Decompiler Project, JetBrains dotPeek, Decompile Android, and dex2jar allowed us to decompile many of the client APK files and server executables into very readable Java code. After reverse engineering the protocols, we set up virtual machines running the above applications and send arbitrary keyboard and mouse commands from the host machine via UDP and TCP.
    [Show full text]
  • Achieving Obfuscation Through Self-Modifying Code: a Theoretical Model
    Running head: OBFUSCATION THROUGH SELF-MODIFYING CODE 1 Achieving Obfuscation Through Self-Modifying Code: A Theoretical Model Heidi Angelina Waddell A Senior Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation in the Honors Program Liberty University Spring 2020 OBFUSCATION THROUGH SELF-MODIFYING CODE 2 Acceptance of Senior Honors Thesis This Senior Honors Thesis is accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation from the Honors Program of Liberty University. _____________________________ Melesa Poole, Ph.D. Thesis Chair ______________________________ Robert Tucker, Ph.D. Committee Member ______________________________ James H. Nutter, D.A. Honors Director ______________________________ Date OBFUSCATION THROUGH SELF-MODIFYING CODE 3 Abstract With the extreme amount of data and software available on networks, the protection of online information is one of the most important tasks of this technological age. There is no such thing as safe computing, and it is inevitable that security breaches will occur. Thus, security professionals and practices focus on two areas: security, preventing a breach from occurring, and resiliency, minimizing the damages once a breach has occurred. One of the most important practices for adding resiliency to source code is through obfuscation, a method of re-writing the code to a form that is virtually unreadable. This makes the code incredibly hard to decipher by attackers, protecting intellectual property and reducing the amount of information gained by the malicious actor. Achieving obfuscation through the use of self-modifying code, code that mutates during runtime, is a complicated but impressive undertaking that creates an incredibly robust obfuscating system. While there is a great amount of research that is still ongoing, the preliminary results of this subject suggest that the application of self-modifying code to obfuscation may yield self-maintaining software capable of healing itself following an attack.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimizing Away Javascript Obfuscation
    Optimizing Away JavaScript Obfuscation Adrian Herrera Defence Science and Technology Group [email protected] Abstract—JavaScript is a popular attack vector for releasing • Applying techniques rooted in compiler theory to the task malicious payloads on unsuspecting Internet users. Authors of of deobfuscating JavaScript malware; this malicious JavaScript often employ numerous obfuscation • The design and implementation of SAFE-DEOBS, an techniques in order to prevent the automatic detection by antivirus and hinder manual analysis by professional malware open-source tool to assist malware analysts to better analysts. Consequently, this paper presents SAFE-DEOBS, a understand JavaScript malware; and JavaScript deobfuscation tool that we have built. The aim • An evaluation of SAFE-DEOBS on a large corpus of real- of SAFE-DEOBS is to automatically deobfuscate JavaScript world JavaScript malware. malware such that an analyst can more rapidly determine the malicious script’s intent. This is achieved through a number of Unless otherwise stated, all malicious code used in this static analyses, inspired by techniques from compiler theory. We paper is taken from real-world malware. demonstrate the utility of SAFE-DEOBS through a case study on real-world JavaScript malware, and show that it is a useful II. BACKGROUND AND RELATED WORK addition to a malware analyst’s toolset. Software obfuscation has many legitimate uses: digital Index Terms—javascript, malware, obfuscation, static analysis rights management, software diversity (for software protec- tion), and tamper protection, to name a few. However, software obfuscation is being increasingly co-opted by malware authors I. INTRODUCTION to thwart program analysis (both automated and manual).
    [Show full text]
  • Large-Scale and Language-Oblivious Code Authorship Identification
    Large-Scale and Language-Oblivious Code Authorship Identification Mohammed Abuhamad Inha University, Incheon, South Korea Tamer AbuHmed Inha University, Incheon, South Korea Aziz Mohaisen University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA DaeHun Nyang Inha University, Incheon, South Korea CCS '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security Pages 101-114. Toronto, Canada — October 15 - 19, 2018 ISBN: 978-1-4503-5693-0 doi>10.1145/3243734.3243738 link: https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3243738 Abstract: Efficient extraction of code authorship attributes is key for successful identification. However, the extraction of such attributes is very challenging, due to various programming language specifics, the limited number of available code samples per author, and the average code lines per file, among others. To this end, this work proposes a Deep Learning-based Code Authorship Identification System (DL-CAIS) for code authorship attribution that facilitates large-scale, language-oblivious, and obfuscation-resilient code authorship identification. The deep learning architecture adopted in this work includes TF-IDF-based deep representation using multiple Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) layers and fully-connected layers dedicated to authorship attribution learning. The deep representation then feeds into a random forest classifier for scalability to de-anonymize the author. Comprehensive experiments are conducted to evaluate DL-CAIS over the entire Google Code Jam (GCJ) dataset across all years (from 2008 to 2016) and over real-world code samples from 1987 public repositories on GitHub. The results of our work show the high accuracy despite requiring a smaller number of files per author. Namely, we achieve an accuracy of 96% when experimenting with 1,600 authors for GCJ, and 94.38% for the real-world dataset for 745 C programmers.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Malware Analysis Report for Jetbrains-Toolbox
    ID: 85 Sample Name: jetbrains-toolbox Cookbook: defaultmacfilecookbook.jbs Time: 19:01:50 Date: 18/12/2020 Version: 31.0.0 Emerald Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 Analysis Report jetbrains-toolbox 3 Overview 3 General Information 3 Detection 3 Signatures 3 Classification 3 Startup 3 Yara Overview 3 Signature Overview 3 Mitre Att&ck Matrix 4 Behavior Graph 4 Screenshots 4 Thumbnails 4 Antivirus, Machine Learning and Genetic Malware Detection 4 Initial Sample 5 Dropped Files 5 Domains 5 URLs 5 Domains and IPs 5 Contacted Domains 5 Contacted IPs 5 Public 6 General Information 6 Joe Sandbox View / Context 6 IPs 6 Domains 7 ASN 7 JA3 Fingerprints 7 Dropped Files 7 Runtime Messages 7 Created / dropped Files 7 Static File Info 7 General 8 Network Behavior 8 Network Port Distribution 8 TCP Packets 8 UDP Packets 8 System Behavior 8 Analysis Process: mono-sgen32 PID: 570 Parent PID: 493 8 General 8 Analysis Process: jetbrains-toolbox PID: 570 Parent PID: 493 9 General 9 File Activities 9 File Created 9 File Read 9 File Written 9 Directory Enumerated 9 Directory Created 9 Copyright null 2020 Page 2 of 9 Analysis Report jetbrains-toolbox Overview General Information Detection Signatures Classification Sample jetbrains-toolbox Name: RReeaaddss lllaauunncchhsseerrrvviiicceess ppllliiissttt fffiiillleess Analysis ID: 85 Reads launchservices plist files MD5: 4650b54b3ec808… Ransomware SHA1: 2b9318975b9e56… Miner Spreading SHA256: f1a93cf94ae4e62… mmaallliiiccciiioouusss malicious Evader Phishing Most interesting Screenshot: sssuusssppiiiccciiioouusss
    [Show full text]
  • An Obfuscation Resilient Approach for Source Code Plagiarism Detection in Virtual Learning Environments
    X9: An Obfuscation Resilient Approach for Source Code Plagiarism Detection in Virtual Learning Environments Bruno Prado, Kalil Bispo and Raul Andrade Department of Computing, Federal University of Sergipe, Marechal Rondon Avenue, Sao¯ Cristov´ ao,¯ Brazil Keywords: Plagiarism Detection, Computer Programming, E-learning, Source Code Similarity, Re-factoring, Obfusca- tion. Abstract: In computer programming courses programming assignments are almost mandatory, especially in a virtual classroom environment. However, the source code plagiarism is a major issue in evaluation of students, since it prevents a fair assessment of their programming skills. This paper proposes an obfuscation resilient approach based on the static and dynamic source code analysis in order to detect and discourage plagiarized solutions. Rather than focusing on the programming language syntax which is susceptible to lexical and structural re- factoring, an instruction and an execution flow semantic analysis is performed to compare the behavior of source code. Experiments were based on case studies from real graduation projects and automatic obfuscation methods, showing a high accuracy and robustness in plagiarism assessments. 1 INTRODUCTION The use of multiple approaches, greatly reduces the chances of false positive cases, while the false neg- In computer science graduation, practical exercises ative condition still can be properly detected, due to for programming language courses are essential to multiple metrics analyzed. The main contributions of improve the learning process (Kikuchi et al., 2014), proposed approach are: specially through e-teaching platforms, such as Moo- • Currently multiple languages are supported, such dle (Moodle, 2017). Although, the effectiveness of as Assembly, C/C++, Go, Java, Pascal and virtual learning environments consist on ensuring that Python.
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomy of Software Obfuscation Techniques for Layered Security Hui Xu1*, Yangfan Zhou2, Jiang Ming3 and Michael Lyu4
    Xu et al. Cybersecurity (2020) 3:9 Cybersecurity https://doi.org/10.1186/s42400-020-00049-3 REVIEW Open Access Layered obfuscation: a taxonomy of software obfuscation techniques for layered security Hui Xu1*, Yangfan Zhou2, Jiang Ming3 and Michael Lyu4 Abstract Software obfuscation has been developed for over 30 years. A problem always confusing the communities is what security strength the technique can achieve. Nowadays, this problem becomes even harder as the software economy becomes more diversified. Inspired by the classic idea of layered security for risk management, we propose layered obfuscation as a promising way to realize reliable software obfuscation. Our concept is based on the fact that real-world software is usually complicated. Merely applying one or several obfuscation approaches in an ad-hoc way cannot achieve good obscurity. Layered obfuscation, on the other hand, aims to mitigate the risks of reverse software engineering by integrating different obfuscation techniques as a whole solution. In the paper, we conduct a systematic review of existing obfuscation techniques based on the idea of layered obfuscation and develop a novel taxonomy of obfuscation techniques. Following our taxonomy hierarchy, the obfuscation strategies under different branches are orthogonal to each other. In this way, it can assist developers in choosing obfuscation techniques and designing layered obfuscation solutions based on their specific requirements. Keywords: Software obfuscation, Layered security, Element-layer obfuscation, Component-layer obfuscation, Inter-component obfuscation, Application-layer obfuscation Introduction ProGuard (ProGuard 2016) and control-flow obfuscation Sofware obfuscation transforms computer programs to with Obfuscator-LLVM (Junod et al. 2015). new versions which are semantically equivalent with the original ones but much harder to understand (Collberg Critical challenge of obfuscation et al.
    [Show full text]