English/Bulgarian

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

English/Bulgarian NGO accreditation ICH-09 - Form ----4 ~ 1. ~ United Nations Intangible : Regu CLT I CJH I ITH ~ Jcational, Scientific and Cultural Cultural Organization Heritage Le 02 MA/ 2017 w .......... o.?$.1.. ··················· REQUEST BY A NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION TO BE ACCREDITED TO PROVIDE ADVISORY SERVICES TO THE COMMITTEE DEADLINE 30 APRIL 2017 Instructions for completing the request form are available at: htt :l/www. unesco. ofi lculturelich/enlforms . Name of the organization 1.a. Official name Please provide the full official name of the organization, in its original language, as it appears in the supporting documentation establishing its legal personality (section B.b below). 1.b. Name in English or French Please provide the name of the organization in English or French. ISozopol Foundation 2. Contact of the organization 2.a. Address of the organization Please provide the complete postal address of the organization, as well as additional contact information such as its telephone number, e-mail address, website, etc. This should be the postal address where the organization carries out its business, regardless of where it may be legally domiciled (see section 8). Organization: Sozopol Foundation Address: 50 Milet Str., Sozopol, Bulgaria Telephone number: +359 894 568 521 E-mail address: [email protected] Website: www.sozopol-foundation.com Other relevant +359 894 568 500 information: Form ICH-09-2018-EN- revised on 31/08/2016- page 1 2.b Contact person for correspondence Provide the complete name, address and other contact information of the person responsible for correspondence concerning this request. Title (Ms/Mr, etc.): Ms. Family name: Arnautska Given name: Nevena Institution/position: Sozopol Foundation I member of the Management Board Address: 50 Milet Str., Sozopol, Bulgaria Telephone number: +359 886 839 977 E-mail address: [email protected] Other relevant N/A information: ~------ - ---- ------·-------------------------------------------------------~ 3. Country or countries in which the organization is active Please identify the country or countries in which the organization actively operates. If it operates entirely within one country, please indicate which country. If its activities are international, please indicate whether it operates globally or in one or more regions, and please list the primary countries in which it carries out activities. Olocal 0 national [gl international (please specify: ) 0 worldwide 0 Africa 0 Arab States 0 Asia & the Pacific ~ Europe & North America 0 Latin America & the Caribbean Please list the primary country(ies) where it is active: Sozopol Foundation implements its activities in the Republic of Bulgaria, while it cooperates with a number of organisations from the countries in Eastern Europe. Priority for the Foundation is the promotion of active cooperation and coordination of NGOs in the region. The organization has many signed Memorandum of Cooperation with several organizations at national and international level. One of them is CIOFF BG. The Signed Memorandum is attached to the current application. ---- ------- -------- ------ -- -- 4 Date of its founding or approximate duration of its existence Please state when the organization came into existence, as it appears in the supporting documentation establishing its legal personality (section B.b below). Sozopol Foundation was established on December 4, 2002. ------------------------------- ~ 5. Objectives of the organization Please describe the objectives for which the organization was established, which should be 'in conformity with the spirit of the Convention' (Criterion C). If the organization's primary objectives are other than safeguarding intangible cultural heritage, please explain how its safeguarding objectives relate to those larger objectives. Not to exceed 350 words; do not attach additional information ---------------- -- --- ------ Sozopol Foundation is a nonprofit organisation that exists for 14 /fourteen/ years. 1t was founded and functions to operate in public benefit. Through the implementation of its activities, the organisation aims to achieve the following objectives: • Making efforts for preservation and promotion of intangible and tangible cultural heritage. Promote awareness of society to protect the tangible and intangible cultural heritage. Introduction of best practices and innovative methods in pursuit of these objectives in line with the already established ones over the years. • Promotion of national values - material and spiritual with the mechanisms of international cooperation, supporting cross-border cooperation for the benefit of the people and the development. • Cooperation with similar organisations in carrying out activities to respect to the socio-cultural authenticity of communities, protection of their material and spiritual heritage, preserving traditions and values and support intercultural understanding and cultural interaction. • Establishment of constructive partnerships with organisations from neighboring countries in order to promote cross-border cooperation in the field of preservation and promotion of intangible and tangible cultural heritage and promoting cultural exchange and sustainable development. Cooperation with the competent international governmental and non-governmental organisations active in the field of cultural heritage, conservation of nature and ensuring an accessible environment for people with disabilities. Supporting social integration and personal development of people with specific abilities. Achieve educational and educative effect through information systems for environment and cultural heritage for the benefit of people and nature. • Assistance for the preservation and promotion of national traditions. • Socialization of cultural and historical sites for their positioning in leading tourist destinations land discover opportunities for spiritual and material enrichment of the population. Among the priorities of the Foundation is to promote active cooperation and coordination of NGOs from Eastern Europe /part of the defined fourth region of UNESCO - Europe and North IAmerica/. • As an NGO, official partner of UNESCO and a member of the NGO-UN ~~05i~~tS.... Committee in two consecutive two-year terms, from 2012 to 2014 and from Foundation is actively working to implement the objectives and priorities o · Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) . ..__ _____ - - -- Form ICH-09-2018-EN- revised on 31/08/2016- page 3 6. The org_anization's activities in the field of safeguarding intangible cultural heritage Sections 6.a to 6.d are the primary place to establish that the NGO satisfies the criterion of having 'proven competence, expertise and experience in safeguarding (as defined in Article 2.3 of the Convention) intangible cultural heritage belonging, inter alia, to one or more specific domains' (Criterion A). 6.a. Domain(s) in which the organization is active Please tick one or more boxes to indicate the primary domains in which the organization is most active. If its activities involve domains other than those listed, please tick 'other domains' and indicate which domains are concerned. I ~ oral traditions and expressions D performing arts ~ social practices, rituals and festive events [8] knowledge and practices concerning nature and the universe [8] traditional craftsmanship D other domains - please specify: 6.b. Primary safeguarding activities in which the organization is involved Please tick one or more boxes to indicate the organization's primary safeguarding activities. If its activities involve safeguarding measures not listed here, please tick 'other safeguarding measures' and specify which ones are concerned. D identification, documentation, research (including inventory-making) [8] preservation, protection [8] promotion, enhancement ~transmission, formal or non-formal education ~ revitalization ~other safeguarding measures- please specify: Implementation of the necessary-inherent, specific, well positioned and identifiable, economically proven, efficient and effective measures to promote the elements of intangible cultural heritage through the development of multimedia works and publication of the messages, information in specialized media outlets. 6.c. Description of the organization's activities Organizations requesting accreditation should briefly describe their recent activities and their relevant experience in safeguarding intangible cultural heritage, including those demonstrating the capacities of the organization to provide advisory services to the Committee. Relevant documentation may be submitted, if necessary, under section B.c below. Not to exceed 550 words; do not attach additional information Sozopol Foundation achieves its objectives by carrying out activities related to protection of cultural heritage. Some of the activities are: protection of tangible and intangible cultural heritage; organization of cultural events; carrying out activities to promote spiritual values of the civil society and the achievements of culture and art; participation in projects with Bulgarian a~-~~IL organisations; organizing congresses, festivals, publications and other materi ....."""'_ organisations in the country and abroad, etc~ -~---- Some of the developed and implemented by the Foundation projects for th o::IUJI"'II'l:> promotion of intangible cultural heritage are: ~ Protection and romotion of cultural and lin uistic diversi ..... 1150th anniversary of the Great Moravian mission of Cyril and
Recommended publications
  • Luftwaffe Airfields 1935-45 Bulgaria
    Luftwaffe Airfields 1935-45 Luftwaffe Airfields 1935-45 Bulgaria By Henry L. deZeng IV General Map Edition: November 2014 Luftwaffe Airfields 1935-45 Copyright © by Henry L. deZeng IV (Work in Progress). (1st Draft 2014) Blanket permission is granted by the author to researchers to extract information from this publication for their personal use in accordance with the generally accepted definition of fair use laws. Otherwise, the following applies: All rights reserved. No part of this publication, an original work by the authors, may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), without the prior written permission of the author. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. This information is provided on an "as is" basis without condition apart from making an acknowledgement of authorship. Luftwaffe Airfields 1935-45 Airfields Bulgaria Introduction Conventions 1. For the purpose of this reference work, “Bulgaria” generally means the territory belonging to the country on 6 April 1941, the date of the German invasion and occupation of Yugoslavia and Greece. The territory occupied and acquired by Bulgaria after that date is not included. 2. All spellings are as they appear in wartime German documents with the addition of alternate spellings where known. Place names in the Cyrillic alphabet as used in the Bulgarian language have been transliterated into the English equivalent as they appear on Google Earth. 3. It is strongly recommended that researchers use the search function because each airfield and place name has alternate spellings, sometimes 3 or 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Vladimir Paounovsky
    THE B ULGARIAN POLICY TTHE BB ULGARIAN PP OLICY ON THE BB ALKAN CCOUNTRIESAND NN ATIONAL MM INORITIES,, 1878-19121878-1912 Vladimir Paounovsky 1.IN THE NAME OF THE NATIONAL IDEAL The period in the history of the Balkan nations known as the “Eastern Crisis of 1875-1879” determined the international political development in the region during the period between the end of 19th century and the end of World War I (1918). That period was both a time of the consolidation of and opposition to Balkan nationalism with the aim of realizing, to a greater or lesser degree, separate national doctrines and ideals. Forced to maneuver in the labyrinth of contradictory interests of the Great Powers on the Balkan Peninsula, the battles among the Balkan countries for superiority of one over the others, led them either to Pyrrhic victories or defeats. This was particularly evident during the 1912-1913 Balkan Wars (The Balkan War and The Interallied War) and World War I, which was ignited by a spark from the Balkans. The San Stefano Peace Treaty of 3 March, 1878 put an end to the Russo-Turkish War (1877-1878). According to the treaty, an independent Bulgarian state was to be founded within the ethnographic borders defined during the Istanbul Conference of December 1876; that is, within the framework of the Bulgarian Exarchate. According to the treaty the only loss for Bulgaria was the ceding of North Dobroujda to Romania as compensa- tion for the return of Bessarabia to Russia. The Congress of Berlin (June 1878), however, re-consid- ered the Peace Treaty and replaced it with a new one in which San Stefano Bulgaria was parceled out; its greater part was put under Ottoman control again while Serbia was given the regions around Pirot and Vranya as a compensation for the occupation of Novi Pazar sancak (administrative district) by Austro-Hun- - 331 - VLADIMIR P AOUNOVSKY gary.
    [Show full text]
  • 7563/11 HGN/Tt 1 DG H 2B COUNCIL of the EUROPEAN
    COUNCIL OF Brussels, 10 March 2011 THE EUROPEAN UNION 7563/11 COPEN 44 EJN 20 EUROJUST 29 NOTE from: Bulgarian Permanent Representation to Delegations Subject: Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders – the Republic of Bulgaria Delegations will find enclosed the notification made by Bulgaria in relation to the abovementioned framework decision. _______________ 7563/11 HGN/tt 1 DG H 2B EN DECLARATIONS AND NOTIFICATIONS BY THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 3, ARTICLE 7(5) AND ARTICLE 19 OF COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 2006/783/JHA OF 6 OCTOBER 2006 ON THE APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION TO CONFISCATION ORDERS The Republic of Bulgaria hereby notifies the General Secretariat of the Council of the following declarations and notifications pursuant to Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders and the Law on the recognition, execution and transmission of decisions on confiscation or seizure and decisions on the enforcement of financial penalties adopted by the National Assembly of the Republic of Bulgaria on 11 February 2010 (published in the State Journal of the Republic of Bulgaria No 15 of 23 February 2010), which transposes the abovementioned Framework Decision into the law of the Republic of Bulgaria. 1) Notification pursuant to Article 3 of Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA (determination of the competent authorities): (а) When the Republic of Bulgaria is the executing State: The competent authorities with regard to the recognition of confiscation or seizure orders shall be the provincial courts and Sofia City Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • Programme for Development of Festivals and Events in Strandja 2017 – 2020
    1 CONTENTS I. ANALYSIS OF THE CURRENT SITUATION AND TRENDS IN THE SOCIO- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF STRANDJA FEST REGION……………………………..3 II. ANALYSIS OF STRATEGIC DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF STRANDJA AS FESTIVAL DESTINATION……………………………………………………6 III. ANALYSIS OF THE FESTIVAL RESOURCES…………………………………………..16 IV. SWOT ANALYSIS OF REGION STRANDJA FEST……………………………………..20 V. FINANCING OF FESTIVAL AND EVENTS………………………………………………25 VI. STRATEGIC PART………………………………………………………………………….35 2 Programme for development of festivals and events in Strandja 2017 – 2020 In developing this program, an economic growth planning approach is used, measurable, socially oriented and fairly reflecting the principles of sustainable tourism as an industry. The developed program aims to ensure the sustainable competitiveness of the Strandja fest region as a tourist destination, to support the sustainable development of the tourism industry, to rely as much as possible on the information obtained from the studies, reports, analyzes prepared within the project “Strandja – the mountain of festivals” funded under INTERREG Program IPA CBC Bulgaria - Turkey 2014-2020. This program takes into account the expectations and intentions of all stakeholders and is in line with the requirements for creating a correct, realistic and stable positioning of the Strandja fest region. I. ANALYSIS OF THE CURRENT SITUATION AND TRENDS IN THE SOCIO- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF STRANDJA FEST REGION 1. A general characteristic of the region The region to the north is limited by Middle and Eastern Stara Planina, to the east - to the Black Sea, to the south - the StrandJa Mountain, the Dervent Heights and the Sakar Mountains. Here are situated the eastern part of the Upper Thracian Plain, part of the sub-Balkan valleys, the Burgas Lowland and part of the Sredna Gora - Sarnena Mountain.
    [Show full text]
  • A Change in a Child Is a Change for Bulgaria Annual Report 2015
    A CHANGE IN A CHILD IS A CHANGE FOR BULGARIA ANNUAL REPORT 2015 ABOUT NNC The National Network for Children (NNC) is an alliance of 131 civil society organisations and supporters, working with and for children and families across the whole country. Promotion, protection and observing the rights of the child are part of the key principles that unite us. We do believe that all policies and practices, that affect directly or indirectly children should be based first and foremost on the best interests of the child. Furthermore they should be planned, implemented and monitored with a clear assessment of the impact on children and young people, and with their active participation. OUR VISION The National Network for Children works towards a society where every child has their own family and enjoys the best opportunities for life and development. There is a harmony between the sectoral policies for the child and the family, and the child rights and welfare are guaranteed. OUR MISSION The National Network for Children advocates for the rights and welfare of children by bringing together and developing a wide, socially significant network of organisations and supporters. OUR GOALS • Influence for better policies for children and families; • Changing public attitudes to the rights of the child; • Development of a model for child participation; • Development of the National Network for Children; • Improving the capacity of the Network and its member organisations; • Promotion of the public image of the National Network for Children. II | Annual Report 2015 | www.nmd.bg Dear friends, In 2015 the National Network for Children made a big step forward and reached its 10th anniversary which we are celebrating today.
    [Show full text]
  • G/SPS/GEN/1072 17 March 2011 ORGANIZATION (11-1356) Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Original: English
    WORLD TRADE G/SPS/GEN/1072 17 March 2011 ORGANIZATION (11-1356) Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Original: English FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE SITUATION IN BULGARIA Communication from the European Union The following communication, received on 15 March 2011, is being circulated at the request of the delegation of the European Union. _______________ I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. On Wednesday 5 January 2011, the Bulgarian authorities confirmed a case of foot and mouth disease (FMD) in one of three wild boars shot on 30 December 2010 in the municipality of Malko Tarnovo, Burgas region, around 2 km from the border with Turkey. 2. Bulgaria has implemented the measures in the framework of Council Directive 2003/85/EC of 29 September 2003 on EU measures for the control of foot-and-mouth disease. The measures provided for in the Directive include epidemiological investigation, suspension of hunting and a ban in feeding wild animals, placing under official surveillance holdings keeping animals of susceptible species, inspection by an official veterinarian of all wild animals shot or found dead, surveillance programmes and prevention measures applicable to the holdings keeping animals of susceptible species and if necessary, in its surroundings, including the transport and movement of animals of susceptible species within, from and to the area, etc. 3. The Bulgarian authorities established a protection zone of 3 km and a surveillance zone of 10 km radius around Kosti and launched a sero-epidemiological surveillance programme within the surveillance zone and in all villages and settlements in the municipalities of Sredets, Malko Tarnovo and Tsarevo. 4.
    [Show full text]
  • FOOT and MOUTH DISEASE (FMD) BULGARIA 2011 Outbreak
    No. 39 FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE (FMD) BULGARIA 2011 outbreak CHRONOLOGY OF MAIN EVENTS AND LIST OF DECISIONS ADOPTED BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION Response to the outbreak in Bulgaria Situation as at 9 November 2011 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Health and Consumers Unit G2: Animal Health 1/27 No. 39 This document summarises the basic information relating to the outbreak of foot and mouth disease (FMD) in Bulgaria and related Union action. This focuses on the animal health aspects. A list of abbreviations can be found below. For additional information, please refer to the Decisions in the Official Journal, to the Commission’s foot and mouth disease webpage, including associated press releases. Several presentations mentioned in this chronology can be found there as well. All Commission Decisions (CDs) can be accessed via the EUR-Lex webpages. For more general animal health information, please refer to the Commission’s Animal Health web- pages. List of abbreviations used: BG Bulgaria LVU Local Veterinary Unit CD Commission Decision MS Member State CID Commission Implementing Decision NRL National Reference Laboratory CVO Chief Veterinary Officer OIE World Organisation for Animal Health EURL EU Reference Laboratory for FMD in Pirbright OJ Official Journal of the European Union EuFMD European Commission for the Control of foot and mouth SCoFCAH Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal disease Health FMD Foot and mouth disease TRACES TRAde Control and Expert System FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2/27 No. 39 Main events Date Main event Action by the European Commission Miscellaneous BG informs the On 30 December 2010, three European Commission wild boars were shot in about the occurrence Makevtci and one of those WED of a case of FMD in a displayed feet lesions.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Relationship Between Atmospheric and Soil Drought in Some Agricultural Regions of South Bulgaria
    Bulgarian Journal of Meteorology and Hydrology Bulgarian National Institute Academy of Meteorology of Sciences and Hydrology Bul. J. Meteo & Hydro 22/3-4 (2017) 42-53 On the relationship between atmospheric and soil drought in some agricultural regions of South Bulgaria Veska Georgieva*, Stanislava Radeva, Valentin Kazandjiev National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology – BAS 66 Tsarigradsko shose Blvd., 1784 Sofia Abstract: Drought is an extreme event, which affects agriculture. Soil drought occurs when the soil water balance is impaired, which causes the deterioration of the physiological state of the plants and directly affects the yields of the crops. Due to the climatic features of the country, the agricultural lands of South Bulgaria suffer from insufficient humidity during the vegetation period of the main agricultural crops. High frequency of extreme phenomena, in particular drought, as well as the several droughts observed in the first decade of the 21st century in Bulgaria and different parts of the world, is a premise for extended monitoring. The forecast of the intensity and the probability of drought acquire high importance. The aim of the study is to investigate the potential in application of atmospheric drought index as a predictor of soil drought in the agricultural regions of Southern Bulgaria. For this purpose, the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and Soil Moisture Index (SMI) are used in the sense of an indicator of impending soil drought during the vegetation period. Representative dry, normal and wet years were selected. The potential for implementation of SPI as an indicator of imminent soil drought has been assessed. Keywords: atmospheric and soil moisture, drought, indices 1.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Released Real Estates in the Administration of the Ministry Of
    List of Released Real Estates in the Administration of the Ministry of Defence, with Private Public Property Deeds (PPPDs), of which Property the MoD is Allowed to Dispose No. of Built-up No. of Area of Area the Plot No. District Municipality City/Town Address Function Buildings (sq. m.) Facilities (decares) Title Deed No. of Title Deed 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Part of the Military № 874/02.05.1997 for the 1 Burgas Burgas City of Burgas Slaveykov Hospital 1 545,4 PPPD whole real estate 2 Burgas Burgas City of Burgas Kapcheto Area Storehouse 6 623,73 3 29,143 PPPD № 3577/2005 3 Burgas Burgas City of Burgas Sarafovo Storehouse 6 439 5,4 PPPD № 2796/2002 4 Burgas Nesebar Town of Obzor Top-Ach Area Storehouse 5 496 PPPD № 4684/26.02.2009 5 Burgas Pomorie Town of Pomorie Honyat Area Barracks area 24 9397 49,97 PPPD № 4636/12.12.2008 6 Burgas Pomorie Town of Pomorie Storehouse 18 1146,75 74,162 PPPD № 1892/2001 7 Burgas Sozopol Town of Atiya Military station, by Bl. 11 Military club 1 240 PPPD № 3778/22.11.2005 8 Burgas Sredets Town of Sredets Velikin Bair Area Barracks area 17 7912 40,124 PPPD № 3761/05 9 Burgas Sredets Town of Debelt Domuz Dere Area Barracks area 32 5785 PPPD № 4490/24.04.2008 10 Burgas Tsarevo Town of Ahtopol Mitrinkovi Kashli Area Storehouse 1 0,184 PPPD № 4469/09.04.2008 11 Burgas Tsarevo Town of Tsarevo Han Asparuh Str., Bl.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case Study of Bulgaria-Turkey Border Area
    Geogaphica Timisiensis, vol. 19, nr. 2, 2010 (pp. 197-205 ) ● BULGARIAN REGIONS AT EU EXTERNAL BORDER: THE CASE STUDY OF BULGARIA-TURKEY BORDER AREA Petar STOYANOV Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Faculty of Geology and Geography Abstract : The study of border areas is a very important scientific and regional political problem. Aim of this paper is to deal the problems and perspectives of Bulgarian border areas development on example of border area to Turkey. It comprises three Bulgarian districts: Burgas, Yambol, and Haskovo. Total area of 16.6 thousands km 2 and population is 824 thousands inhabitants. Development of Bulgarian border area to Turkey is more specific due to its belonging (together with Bulgaria-Greece border area) for long time to the buffer space between Warsaw pact and NATO. Possibilities for entirely revitalization of Bulgarian border region to Turkey exist both through Bulgarian regional policy and planning and EU regional policy. Experience gained in previous period has been used for elaboration of IPA Bulgaria-Turkey CBC Programme 2007. Suggestions are made to further development of Bulgaria-Turkey cross border co-operation, incl. founding of Euroregions. Rezumat : Regiunile Bulgariei la graniŃa externă a UE. Studiu de caz al regiunii fromtaliere Bulgaria-Turcia. Studiul regiunilor de graniŃă reărezintă o problemă şŃtiinŃifică şi regională foarte importantă. Scopul acestui articol este să trateze problemele şi perspectivele de dezvoltare ale ariilor de graniŃă ale Bulgariei, luând ca exemplu graniŃa cu Turcia. Se au în vedere trei districte: Burgas, Yambol şi Haskovo. SuprafaŃa totală este de 16,6 mii km 2 şi populaŃia totală 824 mii locuitori.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Project for Social Inclusion for Vulnerable Groups in Burgas, Sredets and Malko Tarnovo (BULGARIA)
    Case name: Integrated Project for Social Inclusion for Vulnerable Groups in Burgas, Sredets and Malko Tarnovo (BULGARIA) ‘wow factor’ For the moment, the wow factors are all related to the skilled municipal team and their good partners. The institutionalization of this project may work well in Burgas because of the experienced municipal team that could easily take over the project and claim ownership beyond the end of the programme. Because of the serious engagement of the municipality and its partners, the future financial support with delegated budgets may not be an issue – the municipality is capable of competing for these central level budgets and it is likely that they will ensure the budget, once they could demonstrate a well-functioning programme. 1. 1. Subject/issue Integrated approach to Roma inclusion through pre-school, education, healthcare and cultural empowerment. Pre-school, education and healthcare services are coupled with infrastructure programmes – in other words, services will be delivered in improved facilities (kindergartens, schools and medical centers). The project is led by the municipality of Burgas but is implemented in partnership with 2 other municipalities, a Roma foundation, a primary school and a media foundation. The financial support consists of a combination of Swiss (85%) and Bulgarian funds (15%) and is managed in cooperation with 3 Bulgarian ministries: MLSP, MES and MH. This programme is an attempt to closely cooperate with central and local authorities, and in fact vest it within local authorities, so that sustainability and continuity is ensured (funding from central or local budgets, trained municipal human resources, established partnerships lead to a gradual transition of the project into the municipality which receives later financial support from the central budget).
    [Show full text]