Orbital Debris Program Office Orbital Debris Quarterly News

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Orbital Debris Program Office Orbital Debris Quarterly News National Aeronautics and Space Administration Orbital Debris Quarterly News Volume 20, Issues 1 & 2 April 2016 Recent NOAA-16 Satellite Breakup Inside... In late November 2015, the decommissioned synchronous orbit, where it operated until replaced Debris History of NOAA- U.S. weather satellite NOAA-16 (International and transferred to backup status in 2005. An Series Spacecraft 2 Designator 2000-055A, U.S. Strategic Command anomaly abruptly ended communication with the [USSTRATCOM] Space Surveillance Network satellite on 6 June 2014, and it was decommissioned Fragmentation of Fregat [SSN] catalog number 26536) experienced a on 9 June 2014. Upper Stage Debris 2 breakup event, resulting in a substantial debris The breakup occurred at approximately Briz-M Core Stage cloud. The 1475 kg dry mass satellite was launched 0950 GMT on 25 November 2015. At the time, the Fragments Near 21 September 2000, as part of the Polar Operational spacecraft was in an 841 x 857 km orbit. The Joint GEO Orbit 3 Environmental Satellite (POES) series of U.S. Space Operations Center (JSpOC) has now catalogued weather satellites. It was placed into a 98.9° sun- 136 objects, making it a rather large breakup. The Briz-M Core Stage Fragments in figure below Elliptical Orbit 4 is a composite Gabbard plot, Russian SOZ Unit which shows a Breaks Up in March 4 classic pattern. As with previous The 2016 UN COPUOS STSC Meeting 5 NOAA breakups, much of the ORDEM 3.0 V&V debris will remain Document Available 5 in orbit for many decades in what Top Ten Satellite Breakups is already a very Reevaluated 5 crowded altitude. There is no ORDEM 3.0 indication that V&V Findings 7 the breakup was anything other Conference Report 10 than an explosion, Space Missions & possibly due to a Sat Box Score 12-13 battery failure. ♦ Dispersion of debris from the NOAA-16 breakup of 136 tracked debris (including the parent body). The Gabbard plot shows the classic “X” pattern indicative of an explosive breakup from a circular orbit. Note: All requests for information on the recent Astro H (Hitomi) A publication of event are being directed to JAXA, the Japan Aerospace eXploration Agency. the NASA Orbital Debris Program Office Orbital Debris Quarterly News A Debris History of the NOAA-Series Spacecraft The U.S. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric the three generations of NOAA spacecraft have provided regular Administration (NOAA) eponymous spacecraft have provided weather data since the launch of NOAA 1 in 1970. NOAA’s third global weather data as the low Earth orbit (LEO) component of generation spacecraft, NOAA 1-5, were succeeded in service by the the integrated weather data service. As a follow-on to the first two more sophisticated fourth and fifth generations built around the generations of Television InfraRed Observation Satellites (TIROS), TIROS-N and Advanced TIROS-N (ATN) busses. Whereas the third generation vehicles resided in sun-synchronous orbits NOAA International Launch ISS Solid around 1500 km altitude, later vehicles were launched into SSN # Common Name Spacecraft Bus Type Designator Date Rocket Motor Generation lower-inclination orbits around 833 and 870 km altitude. 1970 - 106 4793 NOAA 1 (ITOS-A) DEC 70 3 TIROS-M x The table provides the flight log for these spacecraft. 1972 - 082 6235 NOAA 2 (ITOS-D) OCT 72 3 TIROS-M x The NASA Orbital Debris Program Office (ODPO) 1973 - 086 6920 NOAA 3 (ITOS F) NOV 73 3 TIROS-M x recognizes several types of debris-generating events. 1974 - 089 7529 NOAA 4 (ITOS G) NOV 74 3 TIROS-M x These include standard breakups and anomalous events. 1976 - 077 9057 NOAA 5 (ITOS H) JUL 76 3 TIROS-M x 1979 - 057 11416 NOAA 6 (NOAA A) JUN 79 4 TIROS-N STAR-37S Breakups are the usually destructive disassociation of an 1980 - 043 11819 NOAA B MAY 80 4 TIROS-N STAR-37S orbital object, typically characterized by large separation 1981 - 059 12553 NOAA 7 (NOAA C) JUN 81 4 TIROS-N STAR-37S velocities for the resulting fragments. Anomalous events 1983 - 022 13923 NOAA 8 (NOAA E) MAR 83 4 ATN STAR-37S 1984 - 123 15427 NOAA 9 (NOAA F) DEC 84 4 ATN STAR-37S are the unplanned separation of one or more objects from 1986 - 073 16969 NOAA 10 (NOAA G) SEP 86 4 ATN STAR-37S an essentially intact body, usually at a low velocity; these 1988 - 089 19531 NOAA 11 (NOAA H) SEP 88 4 ATN STAR-37S events may reflect the effects of the space environment on 1991 - 032 21263 NOAA 12 (NOAA D) MAY 91 4 TIROS-N STAR-37S the parent object. 1993 - 050 22739 NOAA 13 (NOAA I) AUG 93 4 ATN STAR-37S NOAA 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, and 14 have experienced 1994 - 089 23455 NOAA 14 (NOAA J) DEC 94 4 ATN STAR-37S 1998 - 030 25338 NOAA 15 (NOAA K) MAY 98 5 ATN STAR-37XFP anomalous events over their operational and post-mission 2000 - 055 26536 NOAA 16 (NOAA L) SEP 00 5 ATN STAR-37XFP lifetimes. NOAA 8 also experienced a breakup event 2002 - 032 27453 NOAA 17 (NOAA M) JUN 02 5 ATN STAR-37XFP on 30 December 1985, believed to have been caused by 2005 - 018 28654 NOAA 18 (NOAA N) MAY 05 5 ATN x a battery explosion. None of these events, however, 2009 - 005 33591 NOAA 19 (NOAA N') FEB 09 5 ATN x TIROS: Television IR Observation Satellite ITOS: Improved TIROS Operational System were as dramatic as the November 2015 explosion of ATN: Advanced TIROS-N NOAA 16. ♦ ISS: Integrated Stage System Fragmentation of Fregat Upper Stage Debris A debris object associated with the launch (International Designator 2011-037B, U.S. reside in an elliptical deep space orbit similar to of Russia’s Spektr-R radio astronomy satellite Strategic Command [USSTRATCOM] Space the payload and is apparently uncataloged. The fragmented on 3-4 August 2015. The object Surveillance Network [SSN] catalog number fragmented object is most likely the separable 37756) is described fuel/oxidizer tank discarded by the Fregat upper in the SSN catalog stage between its early and later burns. Low‐thrust engines as SL-23 DEB, one The Lavochkin Fregat-SB is based on the of five debris objects Fregat upper stage but adds a toroidal hypergolic cataloged with this fuel/oxidizer tank, the sbrasyvaemye blok bakov launch. Four of the (SBB) and is variously referred to as the Main tank block debris objects, piece jettisoned tanks unit (JTU) or block (JTB), as tags C, E, F, and G, shown in Fig. 1. The tank accommodates two are likely the launch fuel and two oxidizer tanks, isolated by spherical Jettisoned vehicle second stage’s bulkheads; unfortunately, at this writing, it is tank block solid rocket motor not clear if these are common bulkheads, as separation caps, and employed in the design of the similar Briz-M are typically observed upper stage’s auxiliary propellant tank. The JTU Ignition support with launches of the uses high pressure helium bottles to pressurize system SL-23/Zenit-3SLBF the tanks and devices to sever attachment and variant launch vehicle. cabling to the Fregat upper stage body, perhaps Main engine Circumstances of this indicative of failure modes. mission’s launch profile Figure 2 provides another view of the Figure 1. A perspective view of the Fregat-SB upper stage. The suffix “SB” indicates the Fregat sbrasyvaemye baki or “jettisonable tanks” variant. Source: imply that the upper Ref. 1. stage, a Fregat-SB, may continued on page 3 2 www.orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov Fragmentation continued from page 2 The JTU structure basis of the Phobos-Grunt propulsion module/ is welded aluminum alloy cruise stage. AMg6 [2] while bulkheads are constructed of AD1 and AMg6 References alloys. Overall dimensions of 1. Land Launch User’s Guide/Rev. B, the toroid are 0.821-m height Space International Services, (1 October 2014). (tank diameter) and an overall 2. Anon. “Propulsion System for diameter of 3.440 m. Dry mass Delivering “Phobos-Grunt” Spacecraft on is quoted as 340-375 kg [3, 4, Phobos Surface”, p. 186. Accessed from ftp:// 5]. The fuel is unsymmetrical naif.jpl.nasa.gov February 2016. dimethylhydrazine (UDMH) 3. Zenit-3SLBV ILV/Zenit-M SRC while the oxidizer is nitrogen User’s Guide, Center for Ground Space tetroxide (N 2O 4). These Infrastructure Operations (TsENKI), (June hypergolic components can 2011). explode on contact, indicating a 4. Asyuchkin, V.A. and S.V. Ishin. possible failure mode. “Multipurpose Upper Stage “Fregat-SB” with Figure 2. The separated JTU. This unit, used by the Phobos-Grunt The event, of unknown Enhanced Power Capacity”, Solar System spacecraft, is assumed identical to the standard JTU. The actual JTU cause, produced a total of Research 46, no. 7, pp. 519-22 (December was likely covered with insulation blankets. Source: Ref. 2. 24 debris. As of 3 April 2016 2012). Russian-language manuscript originally none had entered the SSN published in Vestnik, no. 1, pp. 9-12, (2011). separated tank, revealing the He pressure catalog. Three Fregat-SB upper stages have been 5. Ilin, A. “Fobos-Grunt”, Novosti spheres and stage equipment and systems more launched, and a fourth, modified, provided the Kosmonavtiki, vol. , no. 1, p. 35, (January clearly. 22 2012). ♦ Briz-M Core Stage Fragments Near Geosynchronous Orbit The Briz-M upper stage associated with the launch of Russia’s Cosmos 2513 Additional fuel tank (AFT) Central fuel tank satellite fragmented on 16 January 2016 Upper stage (US) at approximately 03:50 GMT. The object Fairing lower adapter (International Designator 2015-075B, U.S.
Recommended publications
  • GT 1020 Datasheet
    HARDWARE • DATASHEET GT 1020 Cellular-based telematics for general asset management applications. Complete visibility of transportation and heavy equipment assets, industrial equipment and more. The compact and versatile GT 1020 is designed to fit a wide range of asset tracking 4G LTE cellular applications across various market segments, including transportation, supply communications chain, heavy equipment and maritime. As part of a comprehensive solution that can include cellular connectivity, sensors and a cloud application, the GT 1020 enables remote monitoring of fixed and mobile assets, and delivers actionable data Integrated antennas to ensure complete visibility of operations and enable informed business planning. Feature-rich Quick and easy installation Future proof your solution with global communications over the 4G LTE cellular network with 3G/2G fallback. The GT 1020 features optional Bluetooth support for wireless sensors plus an intelligent reporting system that optimizes power and Compact and rugged airtime usage by adjusting the frequency of location updates based on vehicle motion. An optional CAN Bus interface enables advanced vehicle reporting, analytics and diagnostics, while a backup battery enables reporting for up to 11 Optional CAN Bus support months (depending on reporting frequency) without external power. The device includes a digital input that can be used to report on status changes, such as tire pressure alarms or whether the vehicle is on or off. Feature-rich and versatile Quick and discrete installation Integrated cellular and GPS antennas and mounting options with VHB tape or Long-lasting screws make the GT 1020 quick and easy to install and remove. Its small size backup battery supports covert installations on smaller equipment and assets to deter theft and tampering.
    [Show full text]
  • By Tamman Montanaro
    4 Reusable First Stage Rockets y1 = 15.338 m m1 = 2.047 x 10 kg 5 y2 = 5.115 m m2 = 1.613 x 10 kg By Tamman Montanaro What is the moment of inertia? What is the force required from the cold gas thrusters if we assume constancy. Figure 1. Robbert Goddard’s design of the first ever rocket to fly in 1926. Source: George Edward Pendray. The moment of inertia of a solid disk: rper The Rocket Formula Now lets stack a bunch of these solid disk on each other: Length = l Divide by dt Figure 2: Flight path for the Falcon 9; After separation, the first stage orientates itself and prepares itself for landing. Source: SpaceX If we do the same for the hollow cylinder, we get a moment of inertia Launch of: Specific impulse for a rocket: How much mass is lost? What is the mass loss? What is the moment of inertia about the center of mass for these two objects? Divide by m Figure 3: Falcon 9 first stage after landing on drone barge. Source: SpaceX nd On December 22 2015, the Falcon 9 Orbcomm-2 What is the constant force required for its journey halfway (assuming first stage lands successfully. This is the first ever orbital- that the force required to flip it 90o is the equal and opposite to class rocket landing. From the video and flight logs, we Flip Maneuver stabilize the flip). can gather specifications about the first stage. ⃑ How much time does it take for the first stage to descend? We assume this is the time it takes � Flight Specifications for the first stage to reorientate itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Constellations - 2021 Industry Survey and Trends
    [SSC21-XII-10] Satellite Constellations - 2021 Industry Survey and Trends Erik Kulu NewSpace Index, Nanosats Database, Kepler Communications [email protected] ABSTRACT Large satellite constellations are becoming reality. Starlink has launched over 1600 spacecraft in 2 years since the launch of the first batch, Planet has launched over 450, OneWeb more than 200, and counting. Every month new constellation projects are announced, some for novel applications. First part of the paper focuses on the industry survey of 251 commercial satellite constellations. Statistical overview of applications, form factors, statuses, manufacturers, founding years is presented including early stage and cancelled projects. Large number of commercial entities have launched at least one demonstrator satellite, but operational constellations have been much slower to follow. One reason could be that funding is commonly raised in stages and the sustainability of most business models remains to be proven. Second half of the paper examines constellations by selected applications and discusses trends in appli- cations, satellite masses, orbits and manufacturers over the past 5 years. Earliest applications challenged by NewSpace were AIS, Earth Observation, Internet of Things (IoT) and Broadband Internet. Recent years have seen diversification into majority of applications that have been planned or performed by governmental or military satellites, and beyond. INTRODUCTION but they are regarded to be fleets not constellations. There were much fewer Earth Observation com- NewSpace Index has tracked commercial satellite panies in 1990s and 2000s when compared to com- constellations since 2016. There are over 251 entries munications and unclear whether any large constel- as of May 2021, which likely makes it the largest lations were planned.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelsat, Ltd. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Charter)
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): August 12, 2009 Intelsat, Ltd. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter) Bermuda 000-50262 98-0346003 (State or Other Jurisdiction (Commission File Number) (IRS Employer of Incorporation) Identification Number) Wellesley House North, 2nd Floor, 90 Pitts Bay Road, Pembroke, Bermuda HM 08 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) (441) 294-1650 Registrant’s telephone number, including area code n/a (Former Address, If Changed Since Last Report) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below): ☐ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) ☐ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) ☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) ☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition On August 12, 2009, Intelsat, Ltd. issued a press release entitled “Intelsat Reports Second Quarter 2009 Results.” A copy of such press release is furnished as an exhibit to this Current Report on Form 8-K. Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits (d) Exhibits 99.1 Press Release dated August 12, 2009 entitled “Intelsat Reports Second Quarter 2009 Results” -2- SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting, Tracking and Imaging Space Debris
    r bulletin 109 — february 2002 Detecting, Tracking and Imaging Space Debris D. Mehrholz, L. Leushacke FGAN Research Institute for High-Frequency Physics and Radar Techniques, Wachtberg, Germany W. Flury, R. Jehn, H. Klinkrad, M. Landgraf European Space Operations Centre (ESOC), Darmstadt, Germany Earth’s space-debris environment tracked, with estimates for the number of Today’s man-made space-debris environment objects larger than 1 cm ranging from 100 000 has been created by the space activities to 200 000. that have taken place since Sputnik’s launch in 1957. There have been more than 4000 The sources of this debris are normal launch rocket launches since then, as well as many operations (Fig. 2), certain operations in space, other related debris-generating occurrences fragmentations as a result of explosions and such as more than 150 in-orbit fragmentation collisions in space, firings of satellite solid- events. rocket motors, material ageing effects, and leaking thermal-control systems. Solid-rocket Among the more than 8700 objects larger than 10 cm in Earth orbits, motors use aluminium as a catalyst (about 15% only about 6% are operational satellites and the remainder is space by mass) and when burning they emit debris. Europe currently has no operational space surveillance aluminium-oxide particles typically 1 to 10 system, but a powerful radar facility for the detection and tracking of microns in size. In addition, centimetre-sized space debris and the imaging of space objects is available in the form objects are formed by metallic aluminium melts, of the 34 m dish radar at the Research Establishment for Applied called ‘slag’.
    [Show full text]
  • OUFTI-1 Environmental Impact Assessment
    Date: 11/02/2016 Issue: 1 Rev: 1 Page: 1 of 11 OUFTI-1 Environmental Impact Assessment Reference 3_OUF_ENV_IMPACT_1.0 Issue/Rev Issue 1 Rev 0 Date 11/02/2016 Distribution OUFTI-1 team OUFTI-1 Environmental Impact Assessment Date: 11/02/2016 Issue: 1 Rev: 1 Page: 2 of 11 AUTHORS Name Email Telephone X. Werner [email protected] +32 4 366 37 38 S. De Dijcker [email protected] +32 4 366 37 38 RECORD OF REVISIONS Iss/Rev Date Author Section/page Change description 1/0 11/02/2016 X.Werner, All Initial issue S. De Dijcker Copyright University of Liège [2016]. OUFTI-1 Environmental Impact Assessment Date: 11/02/2016 Issue: 1 Rev: 1 Page: 3 of 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS Authors ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Record of revisions ..................................................................................................................... 2 1. Activities and Objectives ................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Project description ....................................................................................................... 4 1.2. Soyuz launch vehicle ................................................................................................... 5 1.3. Arianespace ................................................................................................................. 7 1.4. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • To Secure Long-Term Spaceflight Safety and Orbital Sustainability for the Benefit of Future Generations the Impact of Space Debris
    To secure long-term spaceflight safety and orbital sustainability for the benefit of future generations The impact of space debris Our growing reliance on satellite services 1 active satellite 1957 1,950 active satellites 2019 20,000+ active satellites by 2030 67,000 collision alerts per year very day billions of people around the world rely One of the key ways to reduce the risk of collision in on data from satellites to go about their lives. We orbit is to remove potential threats. Designing and Eexchange messages, talk to family and friends, building a satellite to identify, track, rendezvous, dock check the weather, manage finances, and undertake and de-orbit a piece of debris is an extraordinarily numerous other tasks. In addition, satellites are used difficult technical task on its own. However, developing to manage and mitigate natural disasters, monitor the an orbital debris removal business involves more than Earth’s climate and well-being and provide information just creating the technical solution. We now need a for national security. In short, without satellite data, the consistent global effort to shape regulations and a lives of people around the world would be dramatically vibrant ecosystem that assures a business case. At different. And now the source of this data is at growing Astroscale we are working these important tasks risk of being destroyed by space debris. – developing the technologies, working with the policymakers and closing the business case – that will We don’t see these satellites and the millions of pieces allow for a long-term orbital debris solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Business Review 11, BSAT-3B Will Be Launched by an Kazakhstan on a Russian Soyuz Vehicle
    April 2008 A monthly round-up of space industry developments for the information of our clients and friends. EADS Astrium to Acquire SSTL DISH Selects SS/L for EchoStar XV EADS Astrium announced on April 7 that it On April 22, Space Systems/Loral (SS/L), had entered into an agreement with the announced a contract to build the EchoStar University of Surrey to acquire its 80% XV direct broadcast satellite for DISH stake in Surrey Satellite Technology Network Corporation. Scheduled for launch Limited (SSTL) for an estimated £40-50 in 2010, the spacecraft will be based on million. Based in the United Kingdom, SSTL SS/L’s proven 1300 platform and is designed specializes in the design and manufacture of to support the expansion of DISH Network’s small and micro satellites, including the programming and services. Giove-A test satellite for Europe's Other April Launch Services forthcoming Galileo satellite navigation On April 14, Lockheed Martin Commercial system. The transaction, which remains Launch Services successfully launched the subject to regulatory approvals, will provide ICO G1 satellite for ICO Global the financial and industrial resources Communications (Holdings) Ltd’ from Cape required for SSTL’s expansion and future Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida on an development. It is expected that SSTL will Atlas V 421 vehicle. Built by SS/L based on remain an independent UK company. its 1300 platform, ICO G1 weighed BSAT-3b Contract Awards approximately 6,634 kg at launch, is equipped On April 15, Lockheed Martin Commercial with a 12-meter S-band reflector capable of Space Systems announced its selection by ground-based beam forming that, along with a Japanese satellite operator Broadcasting complementary network of terrestrial Satellite System Corporation (B-SAT) to repeaters, will provide between 10-15 build its next broadcast satellite, designated channels of live television, enhanced BSAT-3b.
    [Show full text]
  • Design for Demise Analysis for Launch Vehicles
    A first design for demise analysis for launch vehicles Henrik Simon, Stijn Lemmens Space debris: Inactive, manmade objects in space Source: ESA Overview Introduction Fundamentals Modelling approach Results and discussion Summary and outlook What is the motivation and task? INTRODUCTION Motivation . Mitigation: Prevention of creation and limitation of long-term presence . Guidelines: LEO removal within 25 years . LEO removal within 25 years after mission end . Casualty risk limit for re-entry: 1 in 10,000 Rising altitude Decay & re-entry above 2000 km Source: NASA Source: NASA Solution: Design for demise Source: ESA Scope of the thesis . Typical design of upper stages . General Risk assessment . Design for demise solutions to reduce the risk ? ? ? Risk A Risk B Risk C Source: CNES How do we assess the risk and simulate the re-entry? FUNDAMENTALS Fundamentals: Ground risk assessment Ah = + 2 Ai � ℎ = =1 � Source: NASA Source: NASA 3.5 m 5.0 m 2 2 ≈ ≈ Fundamentals: Re-entry simulation tools SCARAB: Spacecraft-oriented approach . CAD-like modelling . 6 DoF flight dynamics . Break-up / fragmentation computed How does a rocket upper stage look like? MODELLING Modelling approach . Research on typical design: . Elongated . Platform . Solid Rocket Motor . Lack of information: . Create common intersection . Deliberately stay top-level and only compare effects Modelling approach Modelling approach 12 Length [m] 9 7 5 3 2 150 300 500 700 800 1500 2200 Mass [kg] How much is the risk and how can we reduce it? SIMULATIONS Example of SCARAB re-entry simulation 6x Casualty risk of all reference cases Typical survivors Smaller Smaller fragments fragments Pressure tanks Pressure tanks Main tank Engine Main structure + tanks Design for Demise .
    [Show full text]
  • Enabling Interstellar Probe
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Acta Astronautica 68 (2011) 790–801 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Acta Astronautica journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/actaastro Enabling interstellar probe Ralph L. McNutt Jr.a,n, Robert F. Wimmer-Schweingruber b,1, the International Interstellar Probe Team a The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, M/S MP3-E128, Laurel, MD 20723, USA b Institut fuer Experimentelle und Angewandte Physik, University of Kiel, Leibnizstrasse 11, D-24118 Kiel, Germany article info abstract Article history: The scientific community has advocated a scientific probe to the interstellar medium for Received 15 February 2010 over 30 years. While the Voyager spacecraft have passed through the termination shock Received in revised form of the solar wind, they have limited lifetimes as their radioisotope power supplies 16 June 2010 decay. It remains unclear whether they can reach the heliopause, the boundary between Accepted 2 July 2010 shocked solar wind and interstellar plasmas, and, in any case, they will not reach the Available online 17 August 2010 undisturbed interstellar medium.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Paper
    GIOVE-A’S FREGAT DISPOSAL ASSESSMENT D. Navarro-Reyes(1), R. Zandbergen(2), D. Escobar(3) (1)ESA/ESTEC, Keplerlaan 1, 2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands, Email: [email protected] (2) ESA/ESOC, Robert-Bosch-Str. 5, D-64293 Darmstadt, Germany, Email: [email protected] (3)GMV at ESOC, ESA/ESOC Robert-Bosch-Str. 5, D-64293 Darmstadt, Germany, Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT dedicated stations deployed around the world. The Galileo constellation is defined as a Walker 27/3/1 and is composed of 3 equally-spaced orbital planes with a Galileo will be Europe’s own global navigation satellite nominal inclination of 56 degrees and a semi-major axis system, providing a highly accurate, guaranteed global of 29,600 km. Each plane will contain nine equally- positioning service under civilian control. Following the spaced satellites plus a spare satellite. The first launches approval of Galileo in 1999, a demonstration element are foreseen in 2010, with the full constellation was added – the Galileo System Test Bed (GSTB) with deployed by end 2013. the GIOVE-A and GIOVE-B satellites – to allow early experimentation with the navigation signals and services Following the approval of Galileo in 1999, a before committing to the final constellation design. demonstration element was added – the Galileo System Test Bed (GSTB) with the GIOVE-A and GIOVE-B GIOVE-A (launched on 28 Dec 2005) and GIOVE-B satellites, whose mission was: (launched on 26 April 2008) were injected in the Galileo operational orbit (semi-major axis 29600 km, x To secure use of the frequencies allocated by the circular orbit, inclination 56 degrees) by direct injection International Telecommunications Union (ITU) for with Soyuz/FREGAT launch vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • 59864 Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 185/Wednesday, September 23
    59864 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 185 / Wednesday, September 23, 2020 / Rules and Regulations FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS C. Congressional Review Act II. Report and Order COMMISSION 2. The Commission has determined, A. Allocating FTEs 47 CFR Part 1 and the Administrator of the Office of 5. In the FY 2020 NPRM, the Information and Regulatory Affairs, Commission proposed that non-auctions [MD Docket No. 20–105; FCC 20–120; FRS Office of Management and Budget, funded FTEs will be classified as direct 17050] concurs that these rules are non-major only if in one of the four core bureaus, under the Congressional Review Act, 5 i.e., in the Wireline Competition Assessment and Collection of U.S.C. 804(2). The Commission will Bureau, the Wireless Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2020 send a copy of this Report & Order to Telecommunications Bureau, the Media Congress and the Government Bureau, or the International Bureau. The AGENCY: Federal Communications indirect FTEs are from the following Commission. Accountability Office pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). bureaus and offices: Enforcement ACTION: Final rule. Bureau, Consumer and Governmental 3. In this Report and Order, we adopt Affairs Bureau, Public Safety and SUMMARY: In this document, the a schedule to collect the $339,000,000 Homeland Security Bureau, Chairman Commission revises its Schedule of in congressionally required regulatory and Commissioners’ offices, Office of Regulatory Fees to recover an amount of fees for fiscal year (FY) 2020. The the Managing Director, Office of General $339,000,000 that Congress has required regulatory fees for all payors are due in Counsel, Office of the Inspector General, the Commission to collect for fiscal year September 2020.
    [Show full text]