DOCSLIB.ORG

Mark Shaw Author 1336 El Camino Real Unit #1 Burlingame, CA 94010 [email protected] 415.940.0827

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mark Shaw Author 1336 El Camino Real Unit #1 Burlingame, CA 94010 Mshawin@Yahoo.Com 415.940.0827 Mark Shaw Author 1336 El Camino Real Unit #1 Burlingame, CA 94010 [email protected] 415.940.0827 November 13, 2018 Mr. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. District Attorney New York County District Attorney’s Office One Hogan Place New York, NY 10013 November 20, 2018 Re - Convening of Grand Jury to Re-Investigate Dorothy Kilgallen Murder Based on Evidence in the new book, Denial of Justice: Dorothy Kilgallen, Abuse of Power, and the Most Compelling JFK Assassination Investigation in History (enclosed) Dear Mr. Vance, Jr. In August 2017, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary including forensics pointing to barbiturate poisoning as the cause of death, an obvious staged death scene, multiple witnesses and documents indicating motive, and a prime suspect who knew facts about famed journalist Dorothy’s Kilgallen’s murder only the killer could know, your office issued the following statement to the New York Post: Following a thorough, eight-month-long investigation into the death of Dorothy Kilgallen, the [NY County] District Attorney’s Office has found no evidence from which it could be concluded that Ms. Kilgallen’s death was caused by another person. We would like to thank those who advocated on behalf of Ms. Kilgallen, because information provided by her supporters is one of the reasons why an investigation commenced 51 years after her death. This Office remains dedicated to the investigation of cold cases and, if new evidence comes to light, we will review it appropriately. We will decline further comment on this matter. Portions of the press release were included in this story on September 2, 2017: DA: ‘No evidence’ reporter investigating JFK assassination was murdered By Susan Edelman, NY Post The Manhattan District Attorney’s Office says it has “found no evidence” that newspaper reporter and TV star Dorothy Kilgallen was murdered as she dug deep into the JFK assassination. After announcing last January it would take a new look at Kilgallen’s Nov. 8, 1965, death, a “thorough, eight-month-long investigation” could not conclude that it was a homicide, the DA said in a statement. It thanked her supporters, and promised to review any new evidence that emerges. The office refused to discuss its findings. Mark Shaw, author of a book on Kilgallen, “The Reporter Who Knew Too Much,” slammed the decision as a “miscarriage of justice” and a “cover-up,” citing at least eight witnesses not contacted by the DA. Kilgallen, 52, was found dead in her Manhattan apartment the morning after she appeared as a regular on the hit TV game show “What’s My Line?” The city’s then-medical examiner ruled it accidental, caused by a combination of sleeping pills and liquor. Shaw argues she was drugged, possibly by Mafia associates, and that her JFK files were stolen. “The American public should know what happened to one of its heroes, a reporter with unqualified integrity who sought the truth about the JFK assassination and was killed for doing so,” Shaw said. This puzzling “verdict” by your office came some eight months after a story appeared in the Post under the byline, “Manhattan DA’s Office Probing Death of Reporter with Possible JFK Ties” written by Edelman after my initial book about Kilgallen, The Reporter Who Knew Too Much: The Mysterious Death of What’s My Line TV Star and Media Icon Dorothy Kilgallen, was released in mid-December 2016. Part of the article read: Joan Vollero, a spokeswoman for DA Cyrus Vance Jr., confirmed that a staffer has read the book, and reviewed a letter from author Mark Shaw citing new leads, medical 2 evidence, and witnesses overlooked when Kilgallen, 52, died suddenly on Nov. 8, 1965, at the peak of her career. “I’m hopeful DA investigators will probe any records available and interview witnesses still alive today who can shed light on what happened to this remarkable woman,” Shaw told The Post, which featured his findings last month. “Victims have rights whether their name is Dorothy Kilgallen or Dorothy Doe, and Kilgallen was denied justice in 1965. That’s why I’m fighting for her.” In your office’s press release, the important words to note are: “This Office remains dedicated to the investigation of cold cases and, if new evidence comes to light, we will review it appropriately.” This statement was summarized in paragraph two of the August 17 Post article, noting that your office “promised to review any new evidence that emerges.” Based on the strong statement in the press release and your assertions in the media of being a man of your word with the responsibility to uphold justice wherever injustice rears its ugly head, I respectfully request that the investigation be re-opened and a grand jury be convened to re-investigate Ms. Kilgallen’s tragic death since the conclusion that your office’s probe “found no evidence from which it could be concluded that Ms. Kilgallen’s death was caused by another person” is completely without merit. This request is backed up by a vast amount of new evidence including the most important release of documents about the JFK assassination in history (the Jack Ruby trial transcripts proving Kilgallen was in danger regarding her JFK death probe) that has “come to light” in my new book, Denial of Justice, just released (copy enclosed). The baffling, in-explainable termination of the Kilgallen death probe which your office undertook with great media fanfare occurred following my full cooperation with former homicide detective Richard Ramos, assigned as the chief investigator to probe Kilgallen’s death apparently by Assistant District Attorney Eugene Hurley (Note: both men resigned from your 3 office for reasons unknown in 2018). As noted in Denial of Justice, this cooperation included a multitude of emails between us from January 2018 until late August (see below). As noted in Denial of Justice, my 27th published book following successful careers as criminal defense lawyer and network TV legal analyst for the Mike Tyson, O. J. Simpson and Kobe Bryant cases (markshawbooks.com), the communication between Detective Ramos and I was a result of a June 1, 2017 meeting between us at Hogan Place in New York City. A small conference room had been chosen for the discussion with Ramos, an impressive, medium height man with both a serious and easy going demeanor. He said he was excited about being involved in the investigation since “normally all I handle are embezzlement cases, ones like that.” Ramos said the other detectives in his office were jealous that he was working with the “cold case unit.” He added that his dad was “excited” as well with Ramos being involved in the Kilgallen case to the extent that his father had begun watching her in What’s My Line? re-runs on the internet. At the start of the meeting, this author presented Ramos with a 20+ page “Evidence Report [Full report attached]. It included: A chart listing of the principles involved with Kilgallen’s life and times and her death; A section entitled “Reluctant” (Scared) Witness List (Withholding Evidence); A section entitled, “Credible Evidence/Information Regarding Kilgallen Case” outlining the salient facts regarding a potential prosecution of those responsible for her death; A seven page “New Evidence Summary as of June 1, 2017” listing 25 witnesses along with their statements; A six page “Relevant Factors/Evidence Proving Dorothy Kilgallen Victim of Homicide” listing 33 “relevant factors.”; An incriminating poem written by Ron Pataky, the chief suspect in Kilgallen’s death entitled, “Vodka Roulette Seen as Relief Possibility.” 4 During the meeting, Detective Ramos confirmed that he had read The Reporter Who Knew Too Much and “very much enjoyed it.” He said he had watched the more than 50 interview videos about Kilgallen life and times, and her death posted on www.thedorothykilgallenstory.org. When asked why he was heading up an investigation, he said it “came from his superior.” Throughout the conversation Detective Ramos referred to Kilgallen as a “victim.” When I mentioned that she should be treated like any other person who died mysteriously whether it was five days, five years or fifty years while discussing other victims he had dealt with who were scared to come forward, Ramos nodded in agreement. He mentioned his frustration with cases involving a “beautiful woman who was found sitting up in bed after taking 60 pills,” and the “murder of a guy found in a trunk by a dope dealer who led police to the body but no witnesses would come forward to help solve the murder. When I noted Kilgallen’s family members, including Jill, “Dickie” and Kerry, being uncooperative, he said “this happens a lot when the family may feel they are in jeopardy.” When I explained that Kilgallen’s butler’s daughter Brenda DeJourdan, living in New York City, was reluctant to cooperate (she finally did so), he agreed that he might be successful with her and other witnesses since the DA’s office was now involved. Toward the end of the meeting, he said, “I’ve already sent out some subpoenas,” meaning that his investigation was certainly ongoing. While many of Detective Ramos’ statements offered insight into his focus on a fresh investigation of Kilgallen’s death, one stood out when he said, “I wonder if Ron Pataky [the main suspect in Kilgallen’s death – still alive today] sold [Dorothy] Kilgallen’s information about the JFK assassination to some people. I also wonder why he didn’t go to his “best friend’s 5 funeral,” another reference to Pataky. These statements certainly indicated Detective Ramos’ suspicion of foul play on the part of Pataky, Kilgallen’s close friend/lover and confidant.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Battle of the Brains: Election-Night Forecasting at the Dawn of the Computer Age
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: BATTLE OF THE BRAINS: ELECTION-NIGHT FORECASTING AT THE DAWN OF THE COMPUTER AGE Ira Chinoy, Doctor of Philosophy, 2010 Dissertation directed by: Professor Emeritus Maurine Beasley Philip Merrill College of Journalism This dissertation examines journalists’ early encounters with computers as tools for news reporting, focusing on election-night forecasting in 1952. Although election night 1952 is frequently mentioned in histories of computing and journalism as a quirky but seminal episode, it has received little scholarly attention. This dissertation asks how and why election night and the nascent field of television news became points of entry for computers in news reporting. The dissertation argues that although computers were employed as pathbreaking “electronic brains” on election night 1952, they were used in ways consistent with a long tradition of election-night reporting. As central events in American culture, election nights had long served to showcase both news reporting and new technology, whether with 19th-century devices for displaying returns to waiting crowds or with 20th-century experiments in delivering news by radio. In 1952, key players – television news broadcasters, computer manufacturers, and critics – showed varied reactions to employing computers for election coverage. But this computer use in 1952 did not represent wholesale change. While live use of the new technology was a risk taken by broadcasters and computer makers in a quest for attention, the underlying methodology of forecasting from early returns did not represent a sharp break with pre-computer approaches. And while computers were touted in advance as key features of election-night broadcasts, the “electronic brains” did not replace “human brains” as primary sources of analysis on election night in 1952.
    [Show full text]
  • Dorothy Kilgallen and JFK's Murder Donald E
    Digital Commons @ Georgia Law Popular Media Faculty Scholarship 3-15-2017 Circumstances Undetermined: Dorothy Kilgallen and JFK's Murder Donald E. Wilkes Jr. University of Georgia School of Law, [email protected] Repository Citation Wilkes, Donald E. Jr., "Circumstances Undetermined: Dorothy Kilgallen and JFK's Murder" (2017). Popular Media. 278. https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/fac_pm/278 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Popular Media by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. Please share how you have benefited from this access For more information, please contact [email protected]. Circumstances Undetermined: Dorothy Kilgallen and JFK's Murder By Donald E. Wilkes, Jr. “After the press reported that I had doubts about the [Oswald-was- the-sole-assassin theory], Dorothy Kilgallen called and invited me to meet with her at her Manhattan townhouse. She was the one reporter of my acquaintance who told me that she did not believe that Oswald was the sole murderer and who said that she was going to persevere until she discovered who was involved [in assassinating President John F. Kennedy]…Miss Kilgallen said that she was seriously committed to the case and that the Government was seriously committed to preventing the truth from being known.”—Mark Lane, A Citizen’s Dissent (1968). “[I]f [Dorothy Kilgallen] was murdered, the crime was done to silence her, by a…representative of whatever faction it is that did not want the facts about the JFK assassination to emerge.”—Lee Israel, Kilgallen: A Biography (1979) Single Assassin Rejected Dorothy Mae Kilgallen (1913-1965) was for a time perhaps the best-known female newspaper reporter and columnist in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • April 7, 2021 Sergeant Detective Phillip Panzarella, Cold Case
    April 7, 2021 Sergeant Detective Phillip Panzarella, Cold Case Squad NYPD One Police Plaza New York, NY 10038 Sergeant Detective Panzarella - Thank you for contacting me regarding the Dorothy Kilgallen case. My obligation to report what I strongly believed is a crime to the NYPD was discovered during research into her life and times and eventually her death at age 52 on November 8, 1965. The concerns were based on evidence pointing to a homicide, not accidental death, and strong evidence gathered against Ron Pataky, a former journalist and Kilgallen’s closest confidant when she died. As I believe you will discover as your investigation continues, the bottom line is that unless Pataky, still alive today and living in Ohio, is, at the very least, interviewed based on fresh evidence in addition to that gathered in years past, he will have gotten away with her murder. Why, because motive, means, opportunity, and benefit from the crime exist in a cold case that surely qualifies for investigation since there was none in 1965 including no interviewing of anyone connected to her death including Pataky. Dorothy Kilgallen at her typewriter While I don’t want to overwhelm you with too many details, some background about Kilgallen may be helpful. I first learned of this remarkable women, the mother of three children, in 2015 when I was researching the JFK assassination based on my having practiced law during the 1980s with Jack Ruby’s attorney, Melvin Belli. I did not know much about Dorothy but soon realized that she was an important historical figure best known for being the star panelist on the long running CBS television program, What’s My Line? watched by 20 million people on CBS every Sunday night.
    [Show full text]
  • AMENDED VERIFIED PETITION to EXHUME REMAINS of DOROTHY KILGALLEN and RICHARD KOLLMAR to COLLECT DNA SAMPLE and ORDER ONE, MR
    INDEX NO. 61758/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 16 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/15/2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ------------------------------------------ In the Matter of the Application of Index No: 61758/2019 Mark Shaw, Amended Verified Petition to Exhume Body and for DNA Samples Petitioner, For Leave to Exhume the Bodies of Dorothy Kilgallen and Richard Kollmar and for DNA Samples AMENDED VERIFIED PETITION TO EXHUME REMAINS OF DOROTHY KILGALLEN AND RICHARD KOLLMAR TO COLLECT DNA SAMPLE and ORDER ONE, MR. RON PATAKY, to SUBMIT DNA SAMPLE TO THE COURT To the Supreme Court of the State of New York: This amended petition is filed by Mark Shaw, a steadfast and true kindred spirit for the past six-plus years of the late Ms. Dorothy Kilgallen, the Pulitzer- Prize nominated media icon who did not die accidentally at the young age of fifty- two by ingesting one barbiturate but was poisoned with a combination of three dangerous barbiturates in 1965 following her exhaustive eighteen-month 1 1 of 145 INDEX NO. 61758/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 16 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/15/2019 investigation of the JFK assassination. Based on an urgent need triggered by, among other matters, compelling new evidence pointing additionally to the guilt of former journalist Ron Pataky, the main suspect in her murder, obtained on July 28, 2019, petitioner requests this Honorable Court to grant him as her third-party “intermediary” consent to make preparations to exhume and disinter this remarkable and inspiring woman’s body. In addition, due to an unexpected and startling statement provided by a member of Kilgallen’s family, Susan Dorothy Snaper-Shousha, Kilgallen’s niece, to petitioner and this court in a certified letter dated October 2, 2019 pointing to the potential guilt of her husband Richard Kollmar, a strong suspect in her murder, petitioner has no alternative and thus is compelled to request that his remains be exhumed as well so a DNA sample may be obtained and compared with that of Kilgallen’s and Pataky’s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dorothy Kilgallen Story | Dorothy in Words
    The Dorothy Kilgallen Story | Dorothy in Words http://thedorothykilgallenstory.org/dorothy-kilgallen-in-words.html (index.html) DOROTHY IN WORDS Home (home.html) / Dorothy in Words Newspaper Columns and Articles NEWSPAPER COLUMNS AND ARTICLES PERTAINING TO DOROTHY KILGALLEN & JFK Column Pertaining to Death of Marilyn Monroe – August 5, 1962 1956 Column, “The Real Frank Sinatra Story,” Pertaining to Singer Sinatra, with whom Kilgallen had a Feud for Several Years Column Pertaining to Dr. Sam Sheppard Murder Trial (Case became the film, “The Fugitive,” starring Harrison Ford) Oswald File Must Not Close” Kilgallen Column – November 29, 1963 “Still Live Topic” Kilgallen Column – December, 1963 “DA to Link Ruby to Oswald” Kilgallen column - Feb. 1964 “Nervous Ruby Near Breaking Point” Column – Feb. 1964 “Why Did Oswald Risk All by Shooting Cop?“ Column – April 4, 1964 Journal-American Headline: “Stories Quote Ruby Saying Slaying Was His Own Idea.” (Dorothy Exclusive – Printed Jack Ruby Warren Commission Before its Release Date) - August 9, 1964 “Maybe You Didn’t Know” Kilgallen column – October 4, 1964 In a subsequent column entitled, “Search for the Truth,” Dorothy observed in part: FBI Memorandum dated September 17, 1959 – Included in The Reporter Who Knew Too Much 1 of 11 12/21/2016 2:23 PM The Dorothy Kilgallen Story | Dorothy in Words http://thedorothykilgallenstory.org/dorothy-kilgallen-in-words.html FBI Memorandum dated September 30, 1964 – Included in The Reporter Who Knew Too Much 1. Column Pertaining to Death of Marilyn Monroe – August 5, 1962 If the woman described as Marilyn’s “housekeeper” [Eunice Murray] is really a housekeeper, why was [Marilyn’s] bedroom such a mess? It was a small house and should have been easy to keep tidy.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Closed: Lee Harvey Oswald and the Assassination of JFK by Gerald Posner: a Preliminary Critique by Martin Shackelford
    Case Closed: Lee Harvey Oswald and the Assassination of JFK by Gerald Posner: A Preliminary Critique by Martin Shackelford DEJA VU: In 1964, the Warren Commission, after 8 months of studying the JFK assassination, published a book purporting to solve the case; they got virtually uncritical media support and coverage, but they were wrong. In 1966, after three years of studying the JFK case, Mark Lane published a book purporting to solve it; he got mountains of media coverage, but he was wrong. In 1980, after 17 years of studying the case, David Lifton published a book purporting to solve it; Time magazine devoted two pages to his book, and he got a lot of television coverage, but he was wrong. In 1993, after 2 years of study, Gerald Posner published a book purporting to finally resolve the issues in the case, and US. News & World Report devoted 27 pages in a special issue on the book, and he is getting a lot of television coverage. He, too, is wrong, but the media seems fonder of his version than Lifton's: he says the Warren Commission was right. As he later notes, "An increasing amount of published work is a dangerous mixture of good information with a liberal dose of falsehoods. Sifting out the truth is increasingly difficult for those not well versed in the facts."1 Unfortunately, the same may be said of his own book. BLURBS: Posners book is highly praised on the dust jacket by Tom Wicker, a longtime Warren Commission apologist who in 1979 wrote an introduction to the House Select Committee on Assassinations report (NY.
    [Show full text]
  • Editor & Publisher International Year Books
    Content Survey & Selective Index For Editor & Publisher International Year Books *1929-1949 Compiled by Gary M. Johnson Reference Librarian Newspaper & Current Periodical Room Serial & Government Publications Division Library of Congress 2013 This survey of the contents of the 1929-1949 Editor & Publisher International Year Books consists of two parts: a page-by-page selective transcription of the material in the Year Books and a selective index to the contents (topics, names, and titles) of the Year Books. The purpose of this document is to inform researchers about the contents of the E&P Year Books in order to help them determine if the Year Books will be useful in their work. Secondly, creating this document has helped me, a reference librarian in the Newspaper & Current Periodical Room at the Library of Congress, to learn about the Year Books so that I can provide better service to researchers. The transcript was created by examining the Year Books and recording the items on each page in page number order. Advertisements for individual newspapers and specific companies involved in the mechanical aspects of newspaper operations were not recorded in the transcript of contents or added to the index. The index (beginning on page 33) attempts to provide access to E&P Year Books by topics, names, and titles of columns, comic strips, etc., which appeared on the pages of the Year Books or were mentioned in syndicate and feature service ads. The headings are followed by references to the years and page numbers on which the heading appears. The individual Year Books have detailed indexes to their contents.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mysterious Death of What's My Line TV Star and Media Icon Dorothy Kilgallen Online
    edham [Free pdf] The Reporter Who Knew Too Much: The Mysterious Death of What's My Line TV Star and Media Icon Dorothy Kilgallen Online [edham.ebook] The Reporter Who Knew Too Much: The Mysterious Death of What's My Line TV Star and Media Icon Dorothy Kilgallen Pdf Free Mark Shaw DOC | *audiobook | ebooks | Download PDF | ePub Download Now Free Download Here Download eBook #32849 in Books Post Hill Press 2016-12-06 2016-12-06Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 9.00 x 1.40 x 6.00l, .0 #File Name: 1682610977336 pagesPost Hill Press | File size: 36.Mb Mark Shaw : The Reporter Who Knew Too Much: The Mysterious Death of What's My Line TV Star and Media Icon Dorothy Kilgallen before purchasing it in order to gage whether or not it would be worth my time, and all praised The Reporter Who Knew Too Much: The Mysterious Death of What's My Line TV Star and Media Icon Dorothy Kilgallen: 102 of 105 people found the following review helpful. Dorothy Kilgallen Jack Ruby: A Toxic MixBy Bill HughesIn 1931, at the age of 17, she was a cub reporter for the ldquo;New York Evening Journal.rdquo; At age 23, she was the first woman ldquo;to fly around the world on commercial airlines.rdquo; In 1937, she wrote the screenplay for the film, ldquo;Fly Away Baby.rdquo; She had a cameo role in the Hollywood flick, ldquo;Sinner Take All,rdquo; and her moniker is enshrined on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. Her name is Dorothy Mae Kilgallen and she broke the glass ceiling for women in her chosen profession.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School College Of
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Communications “MOB SISTERS”: WOMEN REPORTING ON CRIME IN PROHIBITION-ERA CHICAGO A Dissertation in Mass Communications by Beth Fantaskey Kaszuba © 2013 Beth Fantaskey Kaszuba Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2013 The dissertation of Beth Fantaskey Kaszuba was reviewed and approved* by the following: Ford Risley Head, Department of Journalism Dissertation Adviser Chair of Committee Ann Marie Major Associate Professor of Communications Russell Frank Associate Professor of Communications Marie Hardin Associate Dean for Undergraduate and Graduate Education *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the work of five women who were employed by the Chicago Tribune as general assignment reporters during the 1920s, and whose unique way of covering the city’s epidemic of crime – with sarcastic humor, a cynical viewpoint and slang-infused prose – merits the creation of a new “category” of female reporter, dubbed here the “mob sister.” Histories of American media generally place women reporters who worked at newspapers prior to World War II into narrowly proscribed roles, leading to a widespread assumption that women were only allowed to cover topics such as fashion, society, and news of interest to homemakers. In addition, most histories tell us that those women who did make the front pages worked either as “stunt girls,” performing daring feats and then writing about their exploits to shock or titillate readers, or as “sob sisters,” covering trials in maudlin prose intended to bring readers to tears. However, a significant number of women broke those barriers during the Prohibition era, especially in Chicago, where the Tribune, in particular, gave women journalists wide latitude to pursue beats traditionally considered more suitable for men in that period.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Shaw Author 1085 Santa Clara Street, #7 Santa Clara, CA 95050 [email protected] 415.940.0827
    Mark Shaw Author 1085 Santa Clara Street, #7 Santa Clara, CA 95050 www.markshawbooks.com [email protected] 415.940.0827 January 14, 2020 Mr. Dermot F. Shea Police Commissioner New York City Police Department 1 Police Plaza New York, NY 10038 Re: New Evidence Regarding Main Suspect Requires Cold Case Squad Investigation of Media Icon Dorothy Kilgallen’s Death in 1965; Otherwise Killer will go Free; Dear Commissioner Shea, Since the New York Police Department and its Cold Case Squad, led now by Chief of Detectives Rodney Harrison, are the guardians of justice for victims of crimes not yet solved, it is important that private citizens like me make you aware when these victims are denied the justice they deserve. This is important even if the crime, in this case a homicide, took place more than 50 years ago since the victim has certain rights, including a thorough investigation of their case, regardless of the time lapse especially when the victim was denied justice despite there being mysterious circumstances surrounding the person’s death. The question of justice denied is even more important when the main suspect of the crime is still alive despite mountains of evidence, including additional incriminating evidence discovered within the last few months, pointing to his guilt, and that suspect has never even been interviewed regarding his complicity in the victim’s death. The disturbing result is that the main suspect may very well get away with murder unless swift action is taken by the Cold Case Squad, which in this case is the proper investigatory agency due its ability to interview the main suspect and other witnesses still alive, having full access to NYPD documents, records, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing the Incomparable Hildegarde: the Sexuality, Style, and Image of a Forgotten Cultural Icon Monica Gallamore Marquette University
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects Introducing the Incomparable Hildegarde: The Sexuality, Style, and Image of a Forgotten Cultural Icon Monica Gallamore Marquette University Recommended Citation Gallamore, Monica, "Introducing the Incomparable Hildegarde: The exS uality, Style, and Image of a Forgotten Cultural Icon" (2012). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 196. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/196 INTRODUCING THE INCOMPARABLE HILDEGARDE: THE SEXUALITY, STYLE, AND IMAGE OF A FORGOTTEN CULTURAL ICON by Monica S. Gallamore A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2012 ABSTRACT INTRODUCING THE INCOMPARABLE HILDEGARDE: THE SEXUALITY, STYLE, AND IMAGE OF A FORGOTTEN CULTURAL ICON Monica S. Gallamore Marquette University, 2012 This study is an historical biography of the popular American entertainer from the nineteen-forties and fifties named Hildegarde. Known by her first name long before such designations became commonplace, Hildegarde achieved such celebrity status that she influenced women‘s fashions and promoted a number of consumer products. She even had her own signature Revlon lipstick and nail polish called ―Hildegarde Rose.‖ Hildegarde‘s career spanned for more than seventy years, beginning as a pianist for silent movies in Milwaukee and eventually becoming the darling of nightclubs and supper clubs. Unfortunately, few people remember this entertainer or her influence. She has been overlooked by historians as a cultural influence and a groundbreaking performer even though in 1945 she was the most popular songstress in the nation. Hildegarde is unique because she did not fit into the accepted archetype of women during her heyday.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mysterious Death of Whats My Line TV Star and Media Icon Dorothy Kilgallen by Mark Shaw
    The Reporter Who Knew Too Much: The Mysterious Death of Whats My Line TV Star and Media Icon Dorothy Kilgallen by Mark Shaw Ebook The Reporter Who Knew Too Much: The Mysterious Death of Whats My Line TV Star and Media Icon Dorothy Kilgallen currently available for review only, if you need complete ebook The Reporter Who Knew Too Much: The Mysterious Death of Whats My Line TV Star and Media Icon Dorothy Kilgallen please fill out registration form to access in our databases Download book here >> Paperback: 352 pages Publisher: Post Hill Press; Reprint edition (October 24, 2017) Language: English ISBN-10: 1682614433 ISBN-13: 978-1682614433 Product Dimensions:6 x 1.1 x 9 inches ISBN10 1682614433 ISBN13 978-1682614 Download here >> Description: Was What’s My Line TV Star, media icon, and crack investigative reporter and journalist Dorothy Kilgallen murdered for writing a tell-all book about the JFK assassination? If so, is the main suspect in her death still at large?These questions and more are answered in former CNN, ESPN, and USA Today legal analyst Mark Shaw’s 25th book, The Reporter Who Knew Too Much. Through discovery of never-before-seen videotaped eyewitness interviews with those closest to Kilgallen and secret government documents, Shaw unfolds a “whodunit” murder mystery featuring suspects including Frank Sinatra, J. Edgar Hoover, Mafia Don Carlos Marcello and a Mystery Man who may have silenced Kilgallen. All while by presenting through Kilgallens eyes the most compelling evidence about the JFK assassinations since the House Select Committee on Assassination’s investigation in the 1970s.Called by the New York Post, “the most powerful female voice in America,” and by acclaimed author Mark Lane the “the only serious journalist in America who was concerned with who killed John Kennedy and getting all of the facts about the assassination,” Kilgallen’s official cause of death reported as an overdose of barbiturates combined with alcohol, has always been suspect since no investigation occurred despite the death scene having been staged.
    [Show full text]