• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Number state filtered coherent state Nilakantha Meher∗ and S. Sivakumary Materials Physics Division, Indira Gandhi Centre For Atomic Research, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Kalpakkam, India-603102 Number state filtering in coherent states leads to sub-Poissonian photon statistics. These states are more suitable for phase estimation when compared with the coherent states. Nonclassicality of these states is quantified in terms of the negativity of the Wigner function and the entanglement potential. Filtering of the vacuum from a coherent state is almost like the photon-addition. However, filtering makes the state more resilient against dissipation than photon-addition. Vacuum state filtered coherent states perform better than the photon-added coherent states for a two-way quantum key distribution protocol. A scheme to generate these states in multi-photon atom-field interaction is presented. I. INTRODUCTION states saturate the uncertainties in the field quadratures to their minimum values allowed by quantum mechanics. Dynamics of the classical electromagnetic field is de- This, in turn, implies that the phase space distribution of scribed by the Maxwell equations. All the features de- a coherent state is well localized. In the context of a har- scribable within this formalism are classified as the clas- monic oscillator, the coherent state wave packet oscillates sical aspects of the field. However, this description is without dispersion. An alternate definition identifies the inadequate as there are experimental observations such coherent state as a displaced vacuum state [1]. Interest- as the anti-bunching of light, quadrature squeezing, sub- ingly, one of the quasi-probability distributions, namely, Poissonian photon statistics, etc., which cannot be under- the Glauber-Sudarshan P-function for the coherent state stood within the classical description [1]. These observa- is a Dirac delta-function, which is a well defined prob- tions are explainable in the quantum description of the ability density. For this reason these states are called electromagnetic field. In this formulation, the most fun- quasi-classical states. Any other choice of coefficients damental states of the electromagnetic field are the num- makes the resultant state non-classical whose P-function ber states, which correspond to states of definite num- is more singular than a delta function. This signals the ber of photons. It is of interest to know those quantum nonclassical aspect of the quantum state [2, 3]. states of the field which have features similar to the clas- sical field. It turns out that the coherent state, which is a Nonclassicality of quantum states is of importance superposition of all the number states with specific super- in quantum optics [5, 6]. The notion of nonclassicality position coefficients, has that property [2, 3]. This spe- is based on the quasi-probability distributions for the cific choice of the superposition coefficients makes the co- quantum states. Negative value of P-function or Wigner herent state very different from these number states. For function is sufficient to identify a quantum state as non- instance, the coherent states are the eigenstates of the an- classical. Many interesting nonclassical states have been nihilation operatora ^, the corresponding complex eigen- defined by suitable modifications of the quasi-classical value α is the coherent state amplitude. These states coherent states; for instance, photon-added coherent form an over-complete basis set so that any state of the states [7], even/odd coherent states [8], truncated electromagnetic field is expressible as a continuous su- coherent states [9, 10], etc. The even and odd coherent perposition. As a consequence, the expectation values of states are defined as the symmetric and anti-symmetric an operator-valued function of the annihilation operator superposition of two coherent states whose complex is the statistical average of the corresponding function amplitudes are of equal magnitude but out of phase of the coherent state amplitude. The expression for the by π [8]. These states exhibit quadrature squeezing arXiv:1801.05704v1 [quant-ph] 16 Jan 2018 coherent state in the number state basis is and sub-Poissonian statistics for suitable values of the amplitude. Agarwal and Tara introduced a new class 1 n 2 X α jαi = e−|αj =2 p jni : (1) of nonclassical states by adding quanta to the coherent state. This states are called photon added coherent state n=0 n! (PACS) [7]. For proper choice of parameters, PACS Correlation functions of any order are factorizable for shows quadrature squeezing and sub-Poissonian photon the coherent states [4]. For large amplitude coherent statistics. Truncated coherent states are obtained by state, the photon number fluctuation is much smaller modifying the expression in Eqn. 1 by removing either than the mean number of photon. Hence large ampli- a finite number of contiguous states starting from the tude coherent states represent the classical field. These vacuum or by removing all the states beyond a specified number state [9, 10]. Another important class of non- classical states is obtained by number state hole burning ∗ [email protected] or filtering in the coherent states [11]. It is known that y [email protected] any pure state in which the vacuum state j0i is absent 2 is nonclassical [12, 13]. A possible generalization is to NSFS is expressible as consider states in which a number state, not necessarily the vacuum, is absent. More generally, states with 1 1 j (α; m)i = (jαi − Cm jmi) = (I − jmi hmj) jαi ; many of the number states not being present in the Nm Nm superposition have been studied to assess their possible (5) use in practical applications such as optical data storage 2 m a superposition of jαi and jmi, where C = e−|αj =2 pα and optical communication [11, 14]. It may be noted m m! that schemes to generate such states are known[15{24]. [25]. The overlap between the states j (α; m)i and jαi is 2 2 In this paper, we study the non classical properties of jhαj (α; m)ij = 1 − jCmj ; (6) number state filtered coherent state. The photon count- ing statistics of these states is discussed in Section II. which is minimum if jαj2 = m. Therefore, maximum Sub-Poissonian statistics is shown to improve phase es- nonclassicality of j (α; m)i is expected if jαj2 = m. timation in comparison to the coherent states. In Sec- tion III, quantification of nonclassicality of these states For a given α, the state j (α; m)i corresponding to is carried out. Entanglement potential and negativity different m are linearly independent. Hence the set 1 of Wigner function are studied in this context. In Sec- fj (α; m)igm=0 can be used as a basis. Further, for a tion IV, the possibility of generating these states in the given m interaction of a 3-level atom with a cavity field is dis- Z 1 2 2 cussed. In Section V, features of vacuum state filtered Nm j (α; m)i h (α; m)j d α = I − jmi hmj ; (7) coherent state are analyzed. Specifically, the robustness π of the state against dissipation is exhibited. This feature which is the completeness relation for the Hilbert space enables these states to perform better than the single less the number state jmi of a harmonic oscillator. photon added coherent state (SPACS) when it comes to It is interesting to note that the even and odd coherent two-way quantum key distribution. Use of these states states are expressible as as a source to generate the even and odd coherent states is discussed in Section VI. s 1 1 − jC j2 p m jECSi = 4 (j (α; m)i + j (−α; m)i); 2 1 + jC0j II. NUMBER STATE FILTERING IN (for odd m) (8) COHERENT STATE and Number state filtered state (NSFS), denoted by s 1 1 − jC j2 j (α; m)i, is defined as p m jOCSi = 4 (j (α; m)i − j (−α; m)i); 2 1 − jC0j 2 1 e−|αj =2 X αn j (α; m)i = p jni ; (2) (for even m): (9) Nm n=0;n6=m n! A. Photon Statistics where Nm is the normalization constant given by r jαj2m Photon statistics is an experimentally measurable as- N = 1 − e−|αj2 : (3) m m! pect of the electromagnetic field. Probability of detecting k photons in a measurement is jhkj (α; m)ij2, where jki This definition implies that the state is obtained if the represents the number state with k photons. Using the number state jmi is absent in the superposition defined number state expression given in Eqn. 2, in Eqn. 1. 2 2 e−|αj αk αm P = jhkj (α; m)ij2 = p − p δ ; (10) The state j (α; m)i does not become jαi for any m. k 2 k;m Nm k! m! However, if m >> jαj or vice-versa, then j (α; m)i ≈ jαi. It is worth noting that the coherent state is a superposi- which gives the average number of photons in the state tion of NSFSs, as 2m 2 Nm y 1 2 −|αj jαj jαi = (j (α; m)i + j (−α; m)i) hn^i = ha ai = 2 jαj − me : (11) 2 Nm m! Nk + (j (α; k)i − j (−α; k)i); (4) For jαj >> m or jαj << m 2 2 where m is odd and k is even. hn^i ≈ jαj ; (12) 3 ~ −2 jαj2 2 as expected since j (α; m)i ≈ jαi under these limits. respectively. Here Nu = e (1 − γ(N + 1; jαj )=N!) Surprisingly, if jαj2 = m, ~ −2 jαj2 2 and Nl = e γ(N + 1; jαj )=N! with γ(N; x) = h N−1 j i 2 −x P x hn^i = jαj ; (13) (N − 1)! 1 − e j=0 j! ; the incomplete Gamma function.

Load more

  10

Copy Link