LOS Banos
www.losbanos.org
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 520 J Street Los Banos, California
AUGUST 19, 2015
If you require special assistance to attend or participate in this meeting, please call the City Clerk's Office @ (209) 827-7000 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting, The City of Los Banos complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990. **************** Si requiere asistencia especial para atender 0 participar en esta junta por favor lIame a /a oficina de /a Secretaria de la ciudad al (209) 827-7000 a /0 menos de 48 haras previas de /ajunta. La Guidad de Los Banos GumpJe con /a Acta de Americanos con DeshabiJidad (ADA) de 1990.
Any writings or documents provided to a majority ofthe City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the meeting and in the City Clerk's office located at City Hall, 520 J Street, Los Banos, California during normal business hours. In addition, such writings and documents may be posted on the City's website atwww./osbanos.orq. ************* Cualquier escritura 0 los documentos proporcionaron a una mayoria del Ayuntamiento respecto a cualquier articulo en este orden del dia sera hecho disponibJe para la inspeccion publica en la reunion y en la oficina de la Secretaria de la ciudad en City Hall, 520 J Street, Los Banos, California durante horas de oficina normales. Ademas, tales escrituras y los documentos pueden ser anunciados en el website de la ciudad en WW\N.losbanos. ora.
1, CALL TO ORDER 7:00 PM
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE_
3, ROLL CALL: (City Council Members)
Faria _, Lewis _, Silveira _, Stonegrove _, Villalta_
4, CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AGENDA.
5. PRESENTATION - Certificate of Appreciation to Ned and Patty Ryan,
Los Banos City Council Agenda - August 19. 2015 Page 1 014 6. PUBLIC FORUM. (Members of the public may address the City Council Members on any item of public interest that is within the jurisdiction of the City Council; includes agenda and non-agenda items. No action will be taken on non-agenda items. Speakers are limited to a five (5) minute presentation. Detailed guidelines are posted on the Council Chamber informational table.)
7. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA. (Items on the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine and will be voted on in one motion unless removed from the Consent Agenda by a City Council Member.)
A. Check Register for #154706 - #155059 in the Amount of $688,302.21.
Recommendation: Approve the check register as submitted.
B. Minutes for the August 5, 2015 City Council Meeting.
Recommendation: Approve the minutes as submitted.
C. Waiver of Business License Fee for Greater San Joaquin Umpire Association.
Recommendation: Waive the Business License Fee as submitted.
D. City Council Resolution No. 5687 - Adopting a Revised Budget for the 2015/2016 Fiscal Year as it Pertains to Expenditures in the Building Department's Professional Services Account.
Recommendation: Adopt the resolution as submitted.
8. PUBLIC HEARING. (If you challenge the proposed action as described herein in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described herein or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing.)
A. Public Hearing - To Receive Public Comment and Consideration of a General Plan Amendment #2015-02 and Zone Change #2015-02 for CAMNIC LLC for One (1) Parcel Currently Designated Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial and to Re-Zone the Same Property from Low Density Residential (R-1) to Neighborhood Commercial (C-N) for the Property Located at 745 West J Street, APN 027-094-005.
1) Ordinance No. 1132 - Amending the Official Zoning Map by Rezoning Property Located at 745 West J Street from Low Density Residential (R 1) to Neighborhood Commercial (C-N). (Second Reading & Adoption)
Recommendation: Receive staff report. open public hearing. receive public comment, close the public hearing, waive the second reading. and adopt the ordinance as submitted.
Los Banos City Council Agenda - August 19, 2015 Page 20f4 B. Public Hearing - To Receive Public Comment and Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit to Allow the Use of Type 41 Alcohol License for the On-sale of Beer and Wine in Conjunction with an Eating Establishment (Hook & Ladder Hot Wings), for the Business Located at 245 West Pacheco Boulevard, Suites A & B, APN 027-161-042.
1) City Council Resolution No. 5688 - Approving Conditional Use Permit #2015-08 for the On-sale of Beer and Wine for Hook & Ladder Hot Wings Located at 245 West Pacheco Boulevard, Suites A & B.
Recommendation: Receive staff report, open public hearing, receive public comment, close the public hearing, and adopt the resolution as submitted.
C. Public Hearing - To Receive Public Comment and Consideration of an Ordinance Amending Title 8 Building Regulations of the City of Los Banos Municipal Code, to Provide an Expedited, Streamlined Solar Permitting Process that Complies with the Solar Rights Act and Assembly Bill 2188. (First Reading & Introduction)
1) Ordinance No. 1133 - Amending Title 8 of the Los Banos Municipal Code by Adding Chapter 6 to Provide an Expedited, Streamlined Permitting Process for Small Residential Rooftop Solar Systems.
Recommendation: Receive staff report, open public hearing, receive public comment, waive the first reading, and introduce the ordinance as submitted.
9. CONSIDERATION OF THE ADOPTION OF CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 5689 - ADOPTING THE 2014 MERCED COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN.
Recommendation: Receive staff report and adopt the resolution as submitted.
10. CONSIDERATION OF THE ADOPTION OF CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 5690 - APPROVING THE 'DRAFT LOS BANOS STATE ROUTE 152 COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONAL STUDY' DATED JUNE 1, 2015, AS PREPARED BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WITH THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS: THE INSTALLATION OF THE RAISED MEDIANS AS OUTLINED IN THE DRAFT STUDY IS NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL; ALL INTERSECTION WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE U-TURNS ARE NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL; THE INSTALLATION OF CUL-DE-SAC ON 9TH STREET AT THE INTERSECTION OF STATE ROUTE 152 AND 9TH STREET IS NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL; AND THE CLOSING OF EXISTING DRIVEWAYS ONTO STATE ROUTE 152 IS NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
Recommendation: Receive staff report and adopt the resolution as submitted.
Los Banos City Council Agenda - August 19, 2015 Page 3 014 11. PRESENTATION REGARDING AN UPDATE ON CHROMIUM 6.
Recommendation: Informational item only, no action to be taken.
12. ADVISEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICES. (Four Reports)
13. CITY MANAGER REPORT.
14. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS.
A. Elizabeth Stonegrove
B. Tom Faria
C. Deborah Lewis
D. Scott Silveira
E. Mayor Mike VillaIta
15. CLOSED SESSION.
A. Conference with Labor Negotiators, Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6, Agency Designated Representatives: City Manager Carrigan, City Attorney Vaughn, City Clerk/Human Resources Director Mallonee, Finance Director Williams, Legal Counsel Tuffo; Employee Organizations: Los Banos Police Dispatchers/Community Services Officers Association (LBPDCSOA) and Unrepresented Miscellaneous Employees.
16. ADJOURNMENT.
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. --£..~:'4z -t.~ Lucille L. Mallonee, City Clerk Dated this 13'h day of August 2015
Los Banos City Council Agenda - August 19, 2015 Page 4 of4 CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION
Presentedera
Ned and Patty Ryan
In appreciation ofyour efforts to improve tfie fandScaping and6eautification ofyour fiome. ~ '.MicfiaeC'1/i{(alta, '.Mayor ([)atea: jlugust 19, 2015 LOS Banos \.f !f!\ CrU:oS! ',~J l:'iU CK # 154706 - 155059 08/19/2015 $688,302.21 Bank Reconciliation Checks by Date User: sorozco LOS Banos Printed: 08112/2015 - 4:51PM Cleared and Not Cleared Checks Print Void Checks
Check No Check Dale Name Module Void Amouut
154706 7/3112015 Accela, Inc. AP 1,157.00 154707 7/3112015 Alert-O-Lite, Inc. AP 625.86 154708 7/31/2015 Henry A Andersou Jf AP 65.00 154709 7/3112015 Arittriaik Uniform Ser IIlc AP 901.78 154710 7/3112015 Kevin Arruda AP 284.47 154711 7/3112015 AT&T AP 367.41 154712 7/3112015 AT&T AP 85.06 154713 7/3112015 Dorothy June Baker AP 106.92 154714 7/3112015 Battery Systems, Inc. AP 705.71 154715 7/3112015 Bear CatMfg Inc AP 420.05 154716 7/3112015 Richard A Blak Phd AP 350.00 154717 7/3112015 Bruce's Tire Inc AP 548.93 154718 7/3112015 aSK Associates AP 1,560.00 154719 7/3112015 Brian Butler AP 252.00 154720 7/31/2015 California Dairies Inc AP 73.30 154721 7/31/2015 Corneast AP 107.10 154722 7/31/2015 Corneast AP 420.00 154723 7/3112015 Copy Shipping Solutions AP 671.31 154724 7/31/2015 LN Curtis & Sons AP 3,912.03 154725 7/31/2015 Dept ofTransportation AP 3,375.69 154726 7/3112015 Esquire Deposition Solution, LLC AP 400.00 154727 7/3112015 Stephen Frates AP 252.00 154728 7/31/2015 GCS Environmental Equipment Services AP 530.22 154729 7/3112015 Galls Inc AP 503.21 154730 7/3112015 Helena Chemical Co Inc AP 770.86 154731 7/3112015 Krazan & Associates Inc AP 4,180.75 154732 7/3112015 Lawson Products, Inc. AP 10.94 154733 7/3112015 Liebert Cassidy Whitmore AP 7,970.00 154734 7/31/2015 Los Banos Express Oil & Lube AP 194.83 154735 7/31/2015 Advance America Cash Advance Centers ofCA. LLC #5 AP 15.80 154736 7/3112015 Alliance HeaIthcare Services AP 15.60 154737 7/3112015 Arrow Drillers, Inc. dba Arrow Construction AP 51.00 154738 7/31/2015 Country Tea and Antiques AP 26.20 154739 7/31/2015 Kimberlite Corp. DBA: Sonitrol AP 26.00 154740 7/3112015 Los Banos Express Oil and Lube AP 26.20 154741 7/3112015 Robie Refigeration, Inc AP 26.00 154742 7/3112015 Sabah International AP 162.40 154743 7/3112015 Security by Design AP 15.80 154744 7/31/2015 Sultan Financial Corporation dba Aaron's Sales & AP 52.00 154745 7/31/2015 Steve Macillas AP 122.50 154746 7/31/2015 Marfab Inc AP 298.48 154747 7/31/2015 Merced Chevrolet Inc. AP 166.80 154748 7/31/2015 Gmar Mondragon AP 252.00 154749 7/3112015 Napa Auto Parts AP 69.96 Check No Check Date Name Module Void Amouut 154750 7/31/2015 The Office City AP 780.69 154751 7/31/2015 PG & E Company AP 257,267.30 154752 7/3l/2015 PG & E Company AP 1,000.00 154753 7/3l/2015 Pinnacle Medical Group AP 40.00 154754 7/31/2015 Scott Savage AP 285.00 154755 7/3l/2015 Santos Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc. AP 13.07 154756 7/31/2015 Henry Schein Inc. AP 307.09 154757 7/3l/2015 Sharpening Shop AP 77.38 154758 7/31/2015 Shetwin Williams Co AP 40.01 154759 7/31/2015 Snap On Tools AP 662.01 154760 7/31/2015 Sorensens True Value AP 166.34 154761 7/31/2015 Tenybeny Company LLC AP 251.20 154762 7/3l/2015 United Textile AP 160.91 154763 7/31/2015 Heather and Dylan Thomas AP 18.35 154764 7/31/2015 Rogerio and Adelaide Silveira AP 59.07 154765 7/31/2015 Home Sweet Home Property Management AP 87.28 154766 7/31/2015 Blossom Valley Realty AP 18.15 154767 7/31/2015 Billy Vber AP 59.07 154768 7/3l/2015 Elba & Luis Sanchez AP 59.07 154769 7/3l/2015 Daniel Mendoza AP 59.07 154770 7/31/2015 Cassinerio Famity AP 61.79 154771 7/3 l/2015 Evan & Jasmine Hill AP 7.61 154772 7/31/2015 Christina Curiel AP 1.61 154773 7/31/2015 Beatriz and Mariano Martinez AP 48.16 154774 7/31/2015 Los Banos Property Management Services AP 4.51 154775 7/3 l/2015 Tom Kaljian AP 80.91 154776 7/3l/2015 Sylvia Nicole AP 91.81 154777 7/3l/2015 Samantha Veyna AP 18.15 154778 7/3l/2015 Misty Kusch AP 46.35 154779 7/3l/2015 Pic and Silvia Romo AP 59.07 154780 7/3l/2015 Maria Vega AP 500.00 154781 7/3l/2015 Jennifer Williams AP 55.00 154782 7/3l/2015 Windecker Inc AP 15,265.41 154783 7/3l/2015 Young's Air Conditioning AP 230.00 154784 7/3l/2015 Zee Medical Service Co AP 131.59 154806 8/4/2015 AfIae-Customer Service AP 95.81 154807 8/4/2015 AfIae-Customer Service AP 143.95 154808 8/4/2015 AfIae-Customer Service AP 41.26 154809 8/4/2015 AfIae-Customer Service AP 48.36 154810 8/4/2015 Bank ofAmerica AP 96,242.61 154811 8/4/2015 Bank ofAmerica AP 12,837.26 154812 8/4/2015 Bank ofAmerica AP 2,503.15 154813 8/4/2015 Franchise Tax Board AP 15.00 154814 8/4/2015 In Shape Health Clubs Inc AP 510.00 154815 8/4/2015 Los Banos Police Assn AP 1,985.00 154816 8/4/2015 MassMutual AP 1,242.34 154817 8/4/2015 MassMutual AP 5,275.00 154818 8/4/2015 Merced County Sheriff AP 286.67 154819 8/4/2015 Nationwide Retirement Solutions AP 1,890.00 154820 8/4/2015 Professional Fire Fighter AP 630.00 154821 8/4/2015 State Disbursement Unit AP 1,924.50 154822 8/4/2015 Vantagepout Transfer Agents· 306797 AP 455.00 154823 8/4/2015 Vantagepoint Transfer Agents· 705827 AP 25.00 154824 8/4/2015 Vantagepoint Transfer Agents· 801838 AP 1,475.00 154825 8/4/2015 Anderson Homes AP 67.90 154826 8/4/2015 Anderson Homes AP 71.08 154827 8/4/2015 Anderson Homes AP 75.55 Check No Check Date Name Module Void Amount 154828 8/4/2015 Edward Sepulveda AP 70.00 154829 8/4/2015 Dawn White AP 70.00 154830 8/4/2015 Monique Guzman AP 16.62 154831 8/4/2015 Maria Barrera AP 100.00 154832 8/4/2015 Michael or Sabrina Weightman AP 12.03 154833 8/4/2015 Araminda Valenzuela AP 12.03 154834 8/4/2015 Norberto Rodriguez AP 18.15 154835 8/4/2015 Jaime Sandoval AP 100.00 154836 8/4/2015 Jessica and James Nelson AP 18.15 154837 8/4/2015 Daniel Ketchum AP 13.56 154838 8/4/2015 Carolina Cabello-Sotelo AP 15.09 154839 8/4/2015 Lori and Jerel Rhodas AP 16.62 154840 8/4/2015 Jamie Del Franco AP 7.44 154841 8/4/2015 Sara Tejada AP 100.00 154842 8/4/2015 Terry Theis AP 100.00 154843 8/4/2015 Ken Giel AP 100.00 154844 8/4/2015 Ricardo Moran AP 18.15 154845 8/4/2015 Esperanza Valencia Del Rio AP 7.44 154846 8/4/2015 Juan Padilla AP 18.15 154847 8/4/2015 Martha Cruz AP 18.15 154848 8/4/2015 Andrea Duenas AP 12.03 154849 8/4/2015 Jasmin Vasquez AP 7.44 154850 8/4/2015 Evelia Borja AP 18.15 154851 8/4/2015 Eusebio Vargas AP 5.91 154852 8/4/2015 Steven Hannon AP 100.00 154853 8/4/2015 Michelle Sandoval AP 100.00 154854 8/4/2015 Francisco Garcia AP 100.00 154855 8/4/2015 Maria Brasil AP 18.15 154856 8/4/2015 Cecilia Rogers AP 18.15 154857 8/4/2015 Guadalupe Perez AP 100.00 154858 8/4/2015 Anton & Jeannine Espino AP 100.00 154859 8/4/2015 Alice Flores AP 16.62 154860 8/4/2015 Hanna Banuelos AP 15.09 154861 8/4/2015 Corey Ann Smith AP 13.56 154862 8/4/2015 Richard or Julia Chaddock AP 100.00 154863 8/4/2015 Martin Deras AP 15.09 154864 8/4/2015 Jordan Narvaez AP 54.16 154865 8/4/2015 Crossfit Valleyview AP 100.00 154866 8/4/2015 Sandra and Roy Niizawa AP 18.15 154867 8/4/2015 ChaoH Lin AP 100.00 154868 8/4/2015 Filiberto and Manuel Mora Maravilla AP 8.97 154869 8/4/2015 Rodolfo Ayala AP 100.00 154870 8/4/2015 David Duke AP 5.91 154871 8/4/2015 Christopher Candelaria AP 16.62 154872 8/4/2015 Miguel Ortega Lopez AP 18.15 154873 8/4/2015 Larry Hutsell AP 18.15 154874 8/4/2015 Miguel Garcia AP 18.15 154875 8/4/2015 Steven Popish AP 100.00 154876 8/4/2015 Leonel Sandoval AP 100.00 154877 8/4/2015 Connie McGhee AP 18.15 154878 8/4/2015 Barbara Dooley AP 18.15 154879 8/4/2015 Jason Lawrence AP 18.15 154880 8/4/2015 Eduardo Loeza AP 7.44 154881 8/4/2015 Gerardo & Lidia Sanchez AP 18.15 154882 8/4/2015 Harold Waddell AP 8.97 154883 8/4/2015 Veronica Medina AP 18.15 154884 8/4/2015 Rosa Maria and Salvador Delgadillo AP 100.00 Check No Check Date Name Module Void Amount 154885 8/4/2015 Raul Sandoval Moreno AP 100.00 154886 8/4/2015 Sara Cruz AP 100.00 154887 8/4/2015 Melissa and Gary Lamb AP 16.62 154888 8/4/2015 Brandon Ciuffo AP 13.56 154889 8/4/2015 Miguel Aparicio Olivera AP 4.38 154890 8/4/2015 Mario Almenanza AP 18.15 154891 8/4/2015 Gloria Clifton AP 10.50 154892 8/4/2015 Regina Stanford AP 18.15 154893 8/4/2015 Eliazar Cendeja AP 15.09 154894 8/4/2015 Sagouspe Commercial, LLC AP 100.00 154895 8/4/2015 Joseph Toscano AP 15.09 154896 8/4/2015 Adelita Annenta Valenzuela AP 13.56 154897 8/4/2015 Sean Shearer AP 18.15 154898 8/4/2015 Maria A and Gilbert Samarron AP 18.15 154899 8/4/2015 Beth Costa AP 18.15 154900 8/4/2015 Albert and Kristin Erratchu AP 16.62 154901 8/4/2015 Ruby Dena AP 18.15 154902 8/4/2015 Paula Hammond AP 100.00 154903 8/4/2015 J &K Restaurants AP 100.00 154904 8/4/2015 Maria Ruiz Ochoa AP 100.00 154905 8/4/2015 Century 21 M&M- Maria Pina AP 53.87 154906 8/4/2015 Susana Mora AP 15.26 154907 8/4/2015 Carla Martinez AP 62.72 154908 8/4/2015 Lupe Vallejn AP 77.70 154909 8/4/2015 Robert Bledsoe AP 50.41 154910 8/4/2015 Blossom Valley Realty AP 88.48 154911 8/4/2015 Tony Vega AP 12.54 154912 8/4/2015 DC Construction AP 55.83 154913 8/4/2015 Coldwell Banker AP 6.19 154914 8/4/2015 Chunyang Xia AP 33.67 154915 8/4/2015 UC Construction AP 45.99 154916 8/4/2015 DC Construction AP 44.35 154917 8/6/2015 Abbott & Kindermann, LLP AP Void 4,117.88 154918 8/6/2015 ABS Direct, Inc. AP Void 1,055.82 154919 8/6/2015 Alert-O-Lite, Inc. AP Void 376.25 154920 8/6/2015 Aramark Unifonn Ser Inc AP Void 331.74 154921 8/6/2015 Kevin Arruda AP Void 422.89 154922 8/6/2015 AT&T AP Void 18.80 154923 8/6/2015 Alma Alvarez AP Void 500.00 154924 8/6/2015 Borelli Real Estate Service, Inc. AP Void 90.00 154925 8/6/2015 Bruce's Tire Inc AP Void 1,000.49 154926 8/6/2015 BSK Associates AP Void 451.00 154927 8/6/2015 California Dairies Inc AP Void 55.41 154928 8/6/2015 California Municipal Statistics, Inc. AP Void 475.00 154929 8/6/2015 Cal Traffic AP Void 302.75 154930 8/6/2015 Central Towing & Transport LLC AP Void 770.00 154931 8/6/2015 Clark Pest Control Inc AP Void 145.00 154932 8/6/2015 LN Curtis & Sons AP Vnid 287.59 154933 8/6/2015 Challenged Family Resource Center AP Vnid 600.00 154934 8/6/2015 Dell Marketing LP AP Void 3,151.54 154935 8/6/2015 Edges Electrical Group, LLC AP Void 84.81 154936 8/6/2015 Eppler & Eppler Inc. AP Void 178.50 154937 8/6/2015 Mario Espinoza AP Void 600.00 154938 8/6/2015 Fanner Brothers Coffee AP Void 79.46 154939 8/6/2015 Fastenal Company AP Void 158.06 154940 8/6/2015 Federal Express AP Void 15.82 154941 8/6/2015 Ferguson Enterprises Inc DBA Groeniger & Company AP Void 760.86 Check No Check Date Name Module Void Amount 154942 8/6/2015 Ferrellgas, Inc. AP Void 202.30 154943 8/6/2015 Forensic Nurse Specialists ofCentral Ca Inc. AP Void 2,200.00 154944 8/6/2015 Fresno Truck Center AP Void 87,081.63 154945 8/6/2015 Joel GArcia AP Void 350.00 154946 8/6/2015 Heppner Precision Machine AP Void 86.73 154947 8/6/2015 Home Depot AP Void 35.03 154948 8/6/2015 JB Anderson Land Use Planning AP Void 11,504.30 154949 8/6/2015 Key Seal Products, Inc. AP Void 766.54 154950 8/6/2015 Los Banos Express Oil & Lube AP Void 83.03 154951 8/6/2015 Marfab Inc AP Void 23.91 154952 8/6/2015 Merced Chevrolet Inc. AP Void 279.40 154953 8/6/2015 Merced County Tax Collector AP Void 74.83 154954 8/6/2015 Merced Truck & Trailer Inc AP Void 57.53 154955 8/6/2015 Mobley Enterprise Inc. AP Void 995.00 154956 8/6/2015 Napa Auto Parts AP Void 33.31 154957 8/6/2015 The Office City AP Void 254.99 154958 8/6/2015 O'Reilly Auto Parts AP Void 5,667.33 154959 8/6/2015 PB Loader Corporation AP Void 25,822.66 154960 8/6/2015 PG&E Company AP Void 5,137.29 154961 8/6/2015 PSG Fencing Corp. AP Void 900.00 154962 8/6/2015 Provost and Pritchard Engineering, Inc. AP Void 1,981.82 154963 8/6/2015 Riggs Ambulance Service AP Void 456.36 154964 8/6/2015 SNAPCD AP Void 123.00 154965 8/6/2015 Henry Schein Inc. AP Void 534.26 154966 8/6/2015 Henry Schein Inc. AP Void 307.09 154967 8/6/2015 Sharpening Shop AP Void 369.40 154968 8/6/2015 Snap On Tools AP Void 1,780.92 154969 8/6/2015 Sol's Mobile Service AP Void 1,335.10 154970 8/6/2015 Sorensens True Value AP Void 397.27 154971 8/6/2015 Stonecreek Properties AP Void 7,096.32 154972 8/6/2015 Telstar Instruments, Inc. AP Void 1,267.80 154973 8/6/2015 Terryberry Company LLC AP Void 402.39 154974 8/6/2015 Tenninix Processing Center AP Void 325.92 154975 8/6/2015 TSC Construction Consulting Corp AP Void 5,000.00 154976 8/6/2015 Underground Service Alert AP Void 615.12 154977 8/6/2015 USA Blue Book AP Void 180.68 154978 8/6/2015 Verizon Wireless AP Void 2.73 154979 8/6/2015 Westside Water Conditioning AP Void 20.00 154980 8/6/2015 American Water Works Assoc. (AWWA) AP 80.00 154981 8/6/2015 Dan Bronson AP 24.46 154982 8/6/2015 CNASurety AP 290.00 154983 8/6/2015 Chevron Usa Inc AP 279.51 154984 8/6/2015 City ofLos Banos Escrow Account AP 3,050.22 154985 8/6/2015 Mark Fachin AP 115.00 154986 8/6/2015 U.S. Bank Equipment Finance AP 1,890.82 154987 8/6/2015 Law Offices ofWilliam A Vaughn AP 7,081.25 154988 8/7/2015 Abbott & Kindermann, LLP AP 4,117.88 154989 8/7/2015 ABS Direct, Inc. AP 1,055.82 154990 8/7/2015 Alert,O,Lite, Inc. AP 376.25 154991 8/7/2015 Aramark Unifonn Ser Inc AP 331.74 154992 81712015 Kevin Arruda AP Void 422.89 154993 81712015 AT&T AP 18.80 154994 8/7/2015 Alma Alvarez AP 500.00 154995 8/712015 Borelli Real Estate Service, Inc. AP 90.00 154996 81712015 Bruce's Tire Inc AP 1,000.49 154997 81712015 BSK Associates AP 451.00 154998 8/712015 California Dairies Inc AP 55.41 Check No Check Date Name Module Void Amouut 154999 81712015 California Municipal Statistics, Inc. AP 475.00 155000 81712015 Cal Traffic AP 302.75 155001 81712015 Central Towing & Transport LLC AP 770.00 155002 81712015 Clark Pest Control Inc AP 145.00 155003 81712015 LN Curtis & Sons AP 287.59 155004 81712015 Challenged Family Resource Center AP 600.00 155005 8/712015 Dell Marketing LP AP 3,151.54 155006 81712015 Edges Electrical Group, LLC AP 84.81 155007 81712015 Eppler & Eppler Inc. AP 178.50 155008 81712015 Mario Espinoza AP 600.00 155009 81712015 Fanner Brothers Coffee AP 79.46 155010 81712015 Fastenal Company AP 158.06 155011 81712015 Federal Express AP 15.82 155012 81712015 Ferguson Enterprises Inc DBA Groeniger & Company AP 760.86 155013 81712015 ferrellgas, Inc. AP 202.30 155014 81712015 Forensic Nurse Specialists of Central Ca Inc. AP 2,200.00 155015 81712015 Fresno Truck Center AP 87,081.63 155016 81712015 Joel GArcia AP 350.00 155017 81712015 Heppner Precision Machine AP 86.73 155018 81712015 Home Depot AP 35.03 155019 81712015 JB Anderson Land Use Planning AP 11,504.30 155020 81712015 Key Seal Products, Inc. AP 766.54 155021 81712015 Los Banos Express Oil & Lube AP 83.03 155022 81712015 Marfab Inc AP 23.91 155023 81712015 Merced Chevrolet Inc. AP 279.40 155024 8/712015 Merced County Tax Collector AP 74.83 155025 81712015 Merced Truck & Trailer Inc AP 57.53 155026 81712015 Mobley Enterprise Inc. AP 995.00 155027 81712015 Napa Auto Parts AP 33.31 155028 8/712015 The Office City AP 254.99 155029 81712015 O'Reilly Auto Parts AP 5,667.33 155030 81712015 PB Loader Corporation AP 25,822.66 155031 81712015 PG & E Company AP 5,137.29 155032 81712015 PSG Fencing Corp. AP 900.00 155033 81712015 Provost and Pritchard Engineering, Inc. AP 1,981.82 155034 8/712015 Riggs Ambulance Service AP 456.36 155035 81712015 SNAPCD AP 123.00 155036 81712015 Henry Schein Inc. AP 534.26 155037 81712015 Henry Schein Inc, AP 307.09 155038 81712015 Sharpening Shop AP 369.40 155039 81712015 Snap On Tools AP 1,780.92 155040 81712015 sors Mobile Service AP 1,335.10 155041 81712015 Sorensens True Value AP 397.27 155042 81712015 Stonecreek Properties AP 7,096.32 155043 81712015 Telstar Instruments, Inc. AP 1,267.80 155044 81712015 Terryberry Company LLC AP 402.39 155045 81712015 Tenninix Processing Center AP 325.92 155046 81712015 TSC Construction Consulting Corp AP 5,000.00 155047 81712015 Underground Service Alert AP 615.12 155048 81712015 USA Blue Book AP 180.68 155049 81712015 Verizon Wireless AP 2.73 155050 8/712015 Westside Water Conditioning AP 20.00 155051 81712015 Ronny's Landscaping AP 38,341.87 155052 81712015 Ronny's Landscaping AP 14,931.22 155055 8/11/2015 Bank ofAmerica AP 438.85 155056 8/1 1/2015 Bank ofAmerica AP 20.33 155057 8/1112015 Bank ofAmerica AP 14.75 Check No Check Date Name Module VoId Amount 155058 8/11/2015 DDK Mechanical, Inc. AP 129.00 155059 8/1 1/2015 Sarah Sanchez AP 469.00
Break in check sequence due to the following: Total Void Check Count: 64 Check # 154785 - 154805 (Payroll) Total Void Check Amount: 180,204.55 Check #155053 - 155054 (Payroll) Total Valid Check Count: 267 Total Valid Check Amount: 688,302.21 Total Check Count: 331 Total Check Amount: 868,506.76 CITY OF LOS BANOS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 5,2015
ACTION MINUTES - These minutes are prepared to depict action taken for agenda items presented to the City Council. For greater detail ofthis meeting refer to the electronic media (CD and/or audio) kept as a permanent record.
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Villalta called the City Council Meeting to order at the hour of 7:01 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Police Chief Brizzee led the pledge of allegiance.
ROLL CALL - MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL PRESENT: Council Members Tom Faria, Deborah Lewis, Scott Silveira, Mayor Michael Villalta; Absent: Elizabeth Stonegrove.
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: City Attorney Vaughn, Assistant City Clerk/Human Resources Technician Sousa, Police Chief Brizzee, City Manager Carrigan, Finance Director Williams, City Treasurer/Accountant I Brazil, Fire Chief Marrison, Assistant Planner II Elms, Public Works Director/City Engineer Fachin and Information Technology Director Spalding.
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Motion by Silveira seconded by Faria to approve the City Council Meeting agenda as submitted. The motion carried by the affirmative action of all City Council Members present; Stonegrove absent.
PUBLIC FORUM: MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ON ANY ITEM OF PUBLIC INTEREST THAT IS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY; INCLUDES AGENDA AND NON-AGENDA ITEMS. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS. SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO A FIVE (5\ MINUTE PRESENTATION. DETAILED GUIDELINES ARE POSTED ON THE COUNCIL CHAMBER INFORMATIONAL TABLE. ERIK LIMON, Republic Services, spoke regarding an award program that was established three years ago to encourage Los Banos commercial customers to recycle based on the State's legislative bill AB-341 (reqUiring customers that have 4 cubic yards of trash to have some form of recycling practices), Republic Services awards the best recyclers every six months and recognizes them in front of the Los Banos City Council and the Los Banos Unified School District Board of Education and then a check in the amount of $500 is then provided to the Los Banos Unified School District in the name of that business, Limon announced the winner as Kathy Ballard owner of Baskin Robbins in Los Banos, Ms. Ballard was not present to receive the certificate; BERTHA FARIA, Los Banos Chamber of Commerce, spoke about how the Chamber welcomed new members including Paradise Tomato Kitchens, Lilly's Party Creations and RentPartyStuff.com and will welcome Surfs Up Frozen Yogurt and Ice Cream on August 11, 2015, there is still time to purchase tickets for the "Grapes, Hops & Shops Wine and Beer Walk in Downtown" and designated driver tickets may also be purchased, the Chamber is busy gearing up for the Annual Fall Street Faire and is looking for vendors of all kinds, getting ready for the Los Banos Tomato Festival to be held on October 2, 2015, thinking ahead to the Christmas Parade on December 4, 2015 and looking for a theme for this year's event, the winner of this year's theme idea will have bragging rights. No one else came forward to speak and the public forum was closed.
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA. Council Member Faria requested that item F be removed from the consent agenda and discussed separately due to a conflict of interest.
Motion by Faria, seconded by Lewis to approve the consent agenda as follows: Check Register for #154077 - #154705 in the Amount of $3,586,231.57; Acceptance of Fourth Quarter Investment Report for 2014/2015; Request from Stonecreek Properties for the Refund of 2014/2015 Special Tax Assessments Charged to Twenty-two (22) Parcels and to Reject Thirteen (13) Parcels; Minutes for the June 23,2015 Special City Council Meeting; Minutes for the July 14, 2015 City Council Meeting; Street ClosHre ReElHest from the Los Banos Chamber of Commerce to l=Iold the AnnHal Fall Street Faire on SatHrdai:; Sel3teml:ler 19, 2015 from 5:30 a.m. 3:00 l3.m. in the Downtown Area and to Close e Street bew.'een 1=1 Street and K Street, J Street between 5l1! Street and ell! Street, and J Street bewleen elll Street and 7l1! Street; City Council Resolution No. 5681 - Amending the Contingency for Henry Miller Storm Drain and L Street Water Line Project to Twenty Percent (20%) from Ten Percent (10%); City Council Resolution No. 5682 - Authorizing Award of Construction Contract for 13th Street Water Extension to JT2 Inc. dba Todd Companies in the amount of $143,750; City Council Resolution No. 5683 - Awarding Professional Services Agreement to CSG Consulting, Inc. for Building Permit Processing, Building Inspections and Plan Check Services for a Period of Three (3) Years with Two (2) Additional One (1) Year Term Extensions Available at the Discretion of the City Council. The motion carried by the affirmative action of all City Council Members present, Stonegrove absent.
Motion by Silveira, seconded by Lewis to approve the Street Closure Request from the Los Banos Chamber of Commerce to Hold the Annual Fall Street Faire on Saturday, September 19, 2015 from 5:30 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. in the Downtown Area and to Close 6th Street between H Street and K Street, J Street between 5th Street and 6th Street, and J th Street between 6 Street and yth Street. The motion carried by the affirmative action of all City Council Members present; Abstain: Faria; Absent: Stonegrove.
PUBLIC HEARING - TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT AND CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A NEW UPDATE TO THE MOBILE VENDOR ORDINANCE LOCATED IN TITLE 9, CHAPTER 3, ARTICLE 36 OF THE LOS BANOS MUNICIPAL CODE. Assistant Planner II Elms presented the staff report which included a PowerPoint.
Mayor Villalta opened the public hearing. No one came forward to speak and the public hearing was closed.
Stonegrove arrived at 7:25 p.m. Council Member Lewis spoke regarding her concern for vendor parking at Pacheco Park stating she feels parking should be at the most eastern parking lot, how the driveway only has so many exits and she wouldn't want to see a vendor to blocking an exit. Assistant Planner II Elms stated the current language regarding vendor parking is specific to the northern boundary and any changes would require the ordinance to be re-introduced. City Attorney Vaughn stated that no changes can be made to the ordinance after the ordinance has been introduced. Assistant Planner II Elms stated that since it is an admin permit that will be issued she can add a condition of approval to each permit issued to state that vendor parking shall be on the eastern side of Pacheco Park.
Council Member Lewis spoke about the inspections the City's fire department will be doing and wonders if the community and economic development department will be alerting the fire department if a vendor may have flammable material and/or poses a threat of any kind to the adjacent businesses. Assistant Planner II Elms stated she will alert the fire department of any hazards. Fire Chief Marrison stated that he and Assistant Planner II Elms have a good relationship as far as discussing safety concerns on projects.
Motion by Silveira, seconded by Stonegrove to waive the second reading of Ordinance No. 1130 - Amending Article 36 of Chapter 3 to Title 9 of the Los Banos Municipal Code Relating to Mobile Food Vending. The motion carried by the affirmative action of all City Council Members present.
Motion by Silveira, seconded by Stonegrove to adopt Ordinance No. 1130 - Amending Article 36 of Chapter 3 to Title 9 of the Los Banos Municipal Code Relating to Mobile Food Vending. The motion carried by the affirmative action of all City Council Members present.
PUBLIC HEARING - TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT AND CONSIDERATION OF LEVYING PROPERTIES FOR WEED ABATEMENT SERVICES PERFORMED DURING THE FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015 OR PRIOR FOR AREAS OF LAND LOCATED IN THE CITY OF LOS BANOS, MERCED COUNTY AS FOLLOWS: ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS 025-101-006, 026-082-022, 027-086-009, 027-161 040, 027-211-001, 027-211-002, 027-211-003, 027-211-011, 430-051-067. Finance Director Williams presented the staff report.
Mayor VillaIta opened the public hearing. No one came forward to speak and the public hearing was closed.
Motion by Silveira, seconded by Faria to adopt City Council Resolution No. 5684 Authorizing the Levy and Collection of Assessments for Weed Abatement within the City of Los Banos. The motion carried by the affirmative action of all City Council Members present.
PUBLIC HEARING - TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT AND CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE USE OF A TYPE 41 ALCOHOL LICENSE FOR THE ON-SALE OF BEER AND WINE IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN EATING ESTABLISHMENT LOCATED AT 1313 E. PACHECO BOULEVARD, SUITE A, APN 026-280-013 (CHINA BUFFET). Assistant Planner II Elms presented the staff report which included a PowerPoint.
Mayor Villalta opened the public hearing. No one came forward to speak and the public hearing was closed.
Motion by Faria, seconded by Silveira to adopt City Council Resolution No. 5685 Approving Conditional Use Permit #2015-07 for the On-sale of Beer and Wine for China NO.1 Buffet Located at 1313 E. Pacheco Boulevard, Suite A. The motion carried by the affirmative action of all City Council Members present.
PUBLIC HEARING - TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT AND CONSIDERATION OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT #2015-02 AND ZONE CHANGE #2015-02 FOR CAMNIC LLC FOR ONE (1) PARCEL CURRENTLY DESIGNATED MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL AND TO RE-ZONE THE SAME PROPERTY FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-n TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (C-N) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 745 WEST J STREET, APN 027-094-005. Assistant Planner II Elms presented the staff report which included a PowerPoint.
Mayor VillaIta inquired as to if a convenience store would be allowed to also have gas facilities located in this zoning district and Assistant Planner II Elms stated that type of use would be more appropriate in the highway commercial district, this zoning district is very light and is intended to serve the neighborhood.
Mayor Villalta opened the public hearing. MARK ERRECA, CAMNIC LLC, stated he was available to answer any questions. No one else came forward to speak and the public hearing was closed.
Motion by Faria, seconded by Silveira to adopt City Council Resolution No. 5686 Approving General Plan Amendment #2015-02 for Property Located at 745 West J Street, More Specifically Identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 027-094-005. The motion carried by the affirmative action of all City Council Members present.
Motion by Faria, seconded by Silveira to waive the first reading of Ordinance No. 1132 Amending the Official Zoning Map by Rezoning Property Located at 745 West J Street from Low Density Residential (R-1) to Neighborhood Commercial (C-N). The motion carried by the affirmative action of all City Council Members present.
Motion by Faria, seconded by Silveira to introduce Ordinance No. 1132 - Amending the Official Zoning Map by Rezoning Property Located at 745 West J Street from Low Density Residential (R-1) to Neighborhood Commercial (C-N). The motion carried by the affirmative action of all City Council Members present.
Motion by Faria, seconded by Silveira to continue the public hearing to August 19, 2015. The motion carried by the affirmative action of all City Council Members present. APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSION MEMBERS FOR THE FOLLOWING: A) PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION - TWO (2) VACANCIES; ONE (1) TERM EXPIRING DECEMBER 31, 2015, AND ONE (1) TERM EXPIRING DECEMBER 31, 2016, AND B) AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION - ONE (1) VACANCY, TERM EXPIRING DECEMBER 31, 2015.
Motion by Villalta, seconded by Silveira to appoint Eduardo Sandoval, term expiring December 31, 2015, to the Parks and Recreation Commission. The motion carried by the affirmative action of all City Council Members present.
Motion by Villalta, seconded by Stonegrove to appoint Refugio Llamas, term expiring December 31, 2016, to the Parks and Recreation Commission. The motion carried by the affirmative action of all City Council Members present.
Motion by VillaIta, seconded by Lewis to appoint Dennis Reed, term expiring December 31,2015, to the Airport Commission. The motion carried by the affirmative action of all City Council Members present.
ADVISEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICES (Two Reports). Assistant Planner II Elms stated that there will be two (2) public hearings at the August 12, 2015 Planning Commission Meeting to consider recommending an amendment to Condition No. 17 of Conditional Use Permit #2014-09 for Mi Barrio Food & Gas Mart located within the Highway Commercial zoning district at 403 N. Mercey Springs Road, more specifically described as Assessor's Parcel Number: 082-072-024; and to consider and make a recommendation to the Los Banos City Council to adopt proposed ordinances for the policy and regulation of Block parties, Famer's Markets, and Zoning Code Appeals located in Title 9 and Chapter 3 of the Los Banos Municipal Code.
CITY MANAGER REPORT. Requested that Fire Chief Marrison update the Council on the current strike team assignments. Chief Marrison stated the City sent two engines to the Willow fire and three days later they requested our OES (Office of Emergency Services) engine, last weekend the fire was contained enough for them to release our engines and the firefighters are back home with their families. The OES engine was re assigned west of Redding and there are 40 fires totaling 26,000 acres, today our firefighters were assigned to a smaller fire, they are very active and busy, hopefully we'll see the OES engine return in the next week.
CITY COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS.
SCOTT SILVEIRA: Attended National Night Out last night at the park on San Luis Street and Ward Road, Republic Services donated a 40" flat screen television, there were Buster Posey bobbleheads given away, thanked Target for everything they did, thanked Public Works and Parks and Recreation employees who were also there helping, as Chief Brizzee stated last night: this is our town and we need to let the bad guys know we are fighting to keep our neighborhoods safe.
ELIZABETH STONEGROVE: Nothing to report. TOM FARIA: It was nice to see Super Pup come out of the closet at National Night Out last night, thank you to Foster Farms for donating the hotdogs, thank you to everyone for coming out.
DEBORAH LEWIS: Thanked the Police Chief and Fire Chief and everyone who attended the National Night Out, it's always good to see the parents and children enjoying themselves and feeling comfortable in the neighborhood; congratulated the newly appointed commissioners.
MAYOR MICHAEL VILLALTA: National Night Out was a lot of fun, we hope to do more outings like this because the public really gets involved, one good thing he saw was that a neighborhood watch group was organized and he encouraged other neighborhoods to do the same, an officer will be assigned to assist you when forming a neighborhood watch group and these groups help to have more eyes on the ground, please also invite council members to your neighborhood watch meetings; invited Erik Limon to present the certificate he spoke of at the public forum to Kathy Ballard as she was not able to be in attendance at the beginning of the meeting.
ADJOURNMENT. The meeting at the hour of 8:16 p.m.
APPROVED:
Michael Villalta, Mayor ATIEST:
Jana R. Sousa, Assistant City Clerk LOS Banos
Agenda Staff Report
TO: Mayor Villalta & City Council Members
FROM: Steve Carrigan, City Manag~
DATE: August 19, 2015
SUBJECT: Waiver of Business License Fee
TYPE OF REPORT: Consent Agenda
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that City Council waive the business license fee of $131.00 for Greater San Joaquin Umpire Association.
Background:
Section 3-1.206 of the Los Banos Municipal codes states, "The community development director or designee shall have the authority to waive license fees for service clubs and religious, educational, or charitable organizations operating as temporary vendors."
Greater San Joaquin Umpire Association has applied for a business license with the City of Los Banos and will be providing umpires for City league softball games. The Association is a nonprofit organization, servicing Merced County and providing education and leadership to ASA umpires. All umpires are independent contractors.
Attachments:
Business License Application Business License Operation Statement Greater San Joaquin Umpire Association Request Letter Non-Profit Status 501 (c)(3) LICENSE NO. Lief-
OUT OF TOWN BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATION 520 J Street Los Banos, CA 93635 - Main Telephone (209) 827-7000 Ext. 138
BUSINESS: or Print Le ibl Forms must be filled out com letel .. ? J. g.1.£ Business Name: J hacopy of the Fi 0 Business Location: City/State ip: '-'u.£.4'-"<-.>LJ.'-'G-...... LL._...... '-.>.L""'-l.J-----._ (physical address is required, No PO Bo es)~~ ~ (7 (7 M,ailing Add~ess: (only)fJ1ffetv'llfrom~ve): 4.~ IE;cJJ..t1h() Clty/StatelZlp: LlIJdf.'? ttl· (L!. =.3_'{( Web: IIJIIJIIJ ti//J(//l, t?dm E-mail: &tlA 2J,d. @etJmC:As!Alel Facsimile: L-) Business Telephone: L-) Cellular: (---l =- _ (Check one) 0 Sole Proprietor 0 Partnership 0 Limited Liability Iii' Corporation 0 Trust
Name of Owner/ EO &1:' Ie: -:--=c±-!.M;:<~~A--+-'-'--£-.l'A-4-!..u.x."",---,~,,#-..LL>"",,-~l.Y-""""~'-'--''--_ Address: City/State:/z;;;;:ip::':~~~~r;,.L
IDENTIFICATION: (Include all that apolyl Check the box to the right if you do NOT possess a prOfeSSiOn~ ~~~~:I (~~~~oJ~e~'~~'i~~?): h gffj flO 737 State E~~~~:menYf~ /-;-4~/-':l:j:f-'.:?,.Lt.~1~~4(7..o:::~';!~-=IJ:-"23--=Z----
Contracto(s: Class: License No: Date of Expiration: _ DRE License No. Health Dept. No#~ _ BEAR No. Date of Expiration:'_' _ ABC License: Type: Bureau of Automotive Repair # _ Doctor # Dentist # Other: I o I am an owner/opera.tor (no outside assistance/agents/employees); or Alld mII~e.s A.e ~ INdfi/6!/'IP t!o".;fieA<:1'o/i.$ o I have outside assistance/agents/employees and understand that valid Worker's Compensation is required prior to conducting business/work, I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTV OF PERJURY THAT ALL INFORMAnON IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KKNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, ld'l·/S Date OUT OF TOWN BUSINESS LICENSE OPERATIONAL STATEMENT
1.
2. Will you have employees? DYes: Full time: _ Part time: _
3. What equipmen, aterials, or supplies will be used (e.g. Commercial Tractor Trailers, Commercial Sweeping Vehicles)? ...... '-'-'CLQ'-'>. _
4. Where will the equipment, materials or supplies be stored (e.g. in the back of my truck, within an on-site Temporary Office Trailer)? ./ @Ne
5. Do you use hazardous materials of any kind? ri No DYes List ll.!! materials and where they will be stored at your business: (LIST THE NAME, ADDRESS AND LICENSE NUMBER OF THE WASTE HAULER):
6. Will the proposed business produce any noise? DYes ~o If yes please explain: _
7. Will the proposed business create any dust? D Yes ~ No If yes please explain: _
OFFICIAL USE ONLY
NAICS CODE: OESCRIPTlON: _
AOMINISTRATlVE FEE: $, REC#: CI Check# C1 Cesh
BUSINESS LICENSE FEE: $ REC #: CI Check # CI Cesh Approved By: Oale: _ GRE6TER Softball With Integrity
Commissioner Matt Pfeifer 937-5066 City ofLos Banos Umpire-In-Chief City Council Sandy Tudor 663-2951 520 J Street Los Banos, CA 93635 DeputyUICI Trainer Ron Adkins 602-3102 Re: Greater San Joaquin
Secretary Umpire Association Paul Toupin 668-1260 To whom it may concern;
Local Ules We have been hired to provide umpires for your City league softball games. Atwater In keeping with your requirements, we have recently applied for a business Frank Borba license in your City. We were told the fee could be waived by you if we Lodi Jim Hunter requested such. 679-3854
Manteca Conrad Beaird Our association is a SOle, non profit with the focus ofour association being 610-6722 to provide education and leadership to the ASA umpires within the Greater Merced San Joaquin area which encompasses Merced County. Sam Estrada 303-3556 We respectfully request an exemption from the license fee since we are a non Modesto Chuck Smith profit organization. The fee we charge to the City is just sufficient to pay the 204-5934 umpires and process their checks. These umpires are independent Mother Lode Chuck Frye contractors and not employees. 293-3188 Sonora Please let me know if this is acceptable, otherwise, I will send a check as Vince Marquez 484-0321 soon as I hear.
Stockton John Buck Sincerely, 607-2671
Tracy Javier Mercado 608-2126 ~~ «:&fv;~ Turlock Sandra J. Tudor Larry Mitts 495-1667 Umpire in Chief I&!J~e~;N. cj/~t \ PAGE 02/04 05/09/2011 15:30 5107870117 STEVENS HEMINGWAY
~ uvmt1lE SSilVtCE DIS'1'RXC'l' D:t1'lIC'l'tlll. P. O. BO% 250B CI1IlC:mNMI, OS 46201 _loyer Ident:.I.f.l.cl'lUon ~: '8~0250737 Date'Ul J DUb 11 "" 17053182015028 CUA'rER SAN JOAQUIN COtlN'n' MM'RO CoDt..ct Persell" ASSOCIAi'I01ll 010 'rHlt A SA D, A. DOIIIrING 0I'.1'!' HALL Contact 'l:eleplJone Nwllbert 425 111 l£L DOlWlO S'.r ,(6"13) 241-5199 S~, en 95202-1997 Internal Revenue Code Section 5Dl(C)(4) A<:_1:Log PerLod BncU.n9': Del:l!llllber 31 rO%lll 990 1leqILtrecl: res AddtmdUlll AppUe,u 110
DaI!U:" Applicant•
Ba.ed on informat.l.on suppl.l.e4, and au=ing your opera~a w.l.l1 be as stated .l.n Y01U' app1.1.ca1:.l.on for recognition elf exemptc.l.on, Ife have det:eJ:tIIined you are exelIIpt from Pecl&ral income t.ax under sel:1:..l.on SOl(a) of the Internal ll.eVenue COde .... an ~an.l.z8..t.l.on desOr1bed in the eao1:.l.on .l.ndiaated abow.
I1nless specifically excepte4, you are liable f~ taxtlill under the Pederal InDll%ance Cl:In1:r1bu1:LolUJ Act; (Bo"1Al HCIU".I.t:y taxes) for e..ch employee to whoul you pay $100 or 1\lCre du:ring a calendar year. And, uol..s .. _eepted, you are '- uso U.able for tax under the Federal l1nllllp1oyment. fax Act. for each SlIlplol"'" to whOlll you pay $50 or more during a ca18lldu ~er if, during the eurrBOt. or p~e If your sources of support., OJ:' ]'ClUJ:' P!U'POses, chuaeter, or method of operat.ion change, please 181: Ull know SO we can cone.i.cler the effect of the .ohange on your ~ 81:11.1:".. In 1:he c..... of an BIIItIIII:lIIlen1: to your organJ..za t!ional 40.._nt or byl.ws, pl_ lIend IlS a copy of tb" _ded do_nt or byl_s. A1BO, you shOlllc1 infolr:lll us of all cllllln98S .I.n your name or adcIrslllll. In the heB4ing ofl:h.l.s letter we be._ .f.n I.f a ratuX'o:Ls requ.\.red, it lRllB'l: be filed l:Iy tbe lS!:h day of th.. f.l.ftb montb aft.... tbe end of YOQr annual aocounti.ng periocl. A penalty of $20 a day i. ch.....ged "hen III return is filed lllte, WIleS" theX'e is It'euonaJ)le "a"s.. for Letter 948 (DO/CG) PAGE 03/84 05/09/2011 15:30 5107870117 STEVENS HEMINGWAY the clelay. However, the max:l.mUlll penalty charged cannot exceed $10,000 or 5 perC....t of your g:OBB receipts tor the year, wh.l.chever .1.11 less. For orqan.l.zat10ne w.l.tll gross receipts _caedinq u,oeo,ooo in any year, tile penalty is $100 per day per return, lUllellll there 111 re,asoneble eause for the alay. :rbe llllU<1mum penalty fOr 811 organJ.zatiOll with g>:ollS receipts exoeeding $1,000,000 shall not exceed $50,000. ~:I.s penalty may also be cbarged .l.f a return is not complete, So please be sure your return is aomplete before yoa flle .l.t. YOU are 1101: rsquJ.reCl 1:0 f:J.le Fe You are >:equired tc make your annual &'et:urn ...vaUlIl>1e for public inapection fa>: three years a!teL' the retUJ:ll is due. YOU are aleo required to make available a copy of your _emption application, any supportinq dooumenta, and th.l.s _pt.l.on letter. J!&.f.lure to malee these dOc:uments available for pul>lic .l.nspeetS,on may elll>ject. you 1:0 a penalty of $20 11">: dell' each day there ia ... failurtll to eolllply (up to a lIlllXimum of $10,000 .I.n the cue of an annual >:e1:UJ;'l1). rou need all employe>: identification IWIIIber .".,. if you have no employees. If an employer identification lIWllber was l20t ente>:ed 011 your appUoation, a number will be aaaigned to you and yoa ",.1.11 be advi....d of it. Please use that number on all J:e1:w:na you file a.ncl in all correspondence with the InteJ:na1 Revenue Servi.... DOZlors lIlay not d.educt contributions 1:0 yoa because you a.re DOt an =9'an i~ation described ill sllation 170(c) of the Clode. UDder section 6113, any fundJ:ais1ng eoUc:its,tion you lIIll1 If we have indicated in the head1ng of this letter that an addendWll appHes. 1:.he enclosed addendum .l.s an integral part cf this let1:el:'. Because t.his lette>: coulcl help resolve any 'i"estions about. your exempt status, you shOllld keep i.t in your p8l:1Danem: records. t.etter 948 (DO/CO) ' ../ 'j.. 65/69/2611 15:36 5167876117 STEVENS HEMINGWAY PAGE 64/34 If you have any questions, plsue contact the pw:son whose name and telephone number are shown 111 the heading'.of this lS1:1:ar. S!nClQrely you...., Letter 948 (Do/OG) LOS Banos Agenda StaffReRQ!! TO: Mayor & City Council Members City Manager FROM: Tim Marrison, Fire Chief/Building Official DATE: August19,2015 SUBJECT: Budget Amendment - Building Dept. Professional Services TYPE OF REPORT: Consent Agenda Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to revise the budget for the 2015-2016 Fiscal Year as it pertains to changes in expenditures. Background: The City Council may amend the budget by resolution adjusting the overall appropriation levels in each fund at any time during the fiscal year if there are available funds and council is in agreement with the request to adjust the budget. Discussion: At the beginning of this current budget year, the Building Department estimated the Professional Services to remain constant from the prior year. However, the cost of professional services involved in the Request for Proposal process of the Building Permit Processing, Building Inspections, and Plan Check Services as well as the Streamline/Expedite Permitting Procedures for Small Residential Rooftop Solar Systems exceeded our anticipated budget allocations. Fiscal Impact: The impact would increase the General Fund by $1 ,500.00 to account number 100-424 100-231. Reviewed by: r \ . ~~~\J\)~ ~------Sonya Willias v Finance Director City Manager Attachments: Resolution Staff Report Budget Amendment Building Professional Services (08-19-15).dOC RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS ADOPTING A REVISED BUDGET FOR THE 2015-2016 FISCAL YEAR AS IT PERTAINS TO EXPENDITURES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Los Banos has been presented an amendment to the 2015-2016 Fiscal Year budget; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Los Banos may adjust the overall appropriation levels in each fund at any time during the Fiscal Year by action to amend the budget; and WHEREAS, the proposed budget increase is $1,500.00 in expenditures for the Building Departments Professional Services account (100-424-100-231). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Los Banos does hereby approve the bUdget amendment to the fiscal year 2015-2016 bUdget increasing appropriations in account 100-424-100-231 in the amount of $1 ,500.00. The foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Los Banos held on the _ day of August 2015, by Council Member who moved its adoption, which motion was duly seconded by Council Member and the Resolution adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: APPROVED: Michael Villalta, Mayor ATTEST: Lucille L. Mallonee, City Clerk Slaff Report _ Budgel Amendment BUildirlg Professional Services _Resolution (08·19·15).doc LOS Banos Agenda Staff ReRQ!! TO: Mayor Villalta and City Council Members FROM: Stacy Souza Elms, Senior Planner~ DATE: August 19, 2015 SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment #2015-02 and Zone Change #2015-02 CAMNIC LLC TYPE OF REPORT: Public Hearing Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Open the Public Hearing and receive applicant and public comment; 2. Consider comments presented at the hearing, the information in the Staff Report, the recommendation of the Planning Commission and discuss the proposal; 3. Adopt Ordinance No. 1132 Background: On August 5,2015 the Los Banos City Council waived the first reading and introduced by title Ordinance No, 1132 and adopted Resolution No. 5686. The applicant, CAMNIC LLC, is requesting a General Plan Amendment to re-designate the land use for the property located at 745 West J Street from Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial and to Re-Zone the property from Low Density Residential (R-1) to Neighborhood Commercial (C-N). The purpose is to create a conforming use for the property that was previously used as office space for administration services for the Federal Government. The applicant has recently purchased the property and is currently rehabilitating the existing structure for office type uses. The Los Banos Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 8, 2015 for the purpose of considering the above mentioned project. At the completion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended approval of General Plan Amendment #2015-02 and Zone Change #2015-02 to the Los Banos City Council. Discussion: The project site located at 745 West J Street on the southeast corner of Maryland Avenue and West J Street. The site is surrounded by mixed uses that consist of medical offices to the north, a church to the east, residential to the south and a medical office to the west. Additionally, the surrounding zoning is depicted on the map below. Note that the yellow color is Low Density Residential (R-1), fuchsia is Professional Office (P-O), light pink is Neighborhood Commercial (C-N), and green is Park. Environmental Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City of Los Banos Environmental Quality Guidelines, it has been determined that this project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA per Article 19, Section 15301 Existing Facilities in that the project proposes no expansion of the pre-existing use or facility. PROJECT ANALYSIS: Existing Setting The existing parcel currently has one existing structure which historically was used by the Federal Government as office space for administrative purposes. The property has a Los Banos General Plan land use designation of Medium Density Residential. The existing administrative office building has been vacant for several years. The building was always considered pre-existing non-conforming during its operations as the zoning was Low Density Residential (R-1). The building is no longer grandfathered as a commercial use and the property needs to be brought into conformance in order to be utilized for administrative/office purposes. Proposed Uses and Density The project includes a General Plan Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial and a re-zone from the current Low Density Residential (R- 1) zoning to Neighborhood Commercial (C-N). The existing General Plan Land Use and Zoning Maps are included as attachments. Pursuant to Section 9-3.1102 the uses permitted in the Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District are as follow: (a) Food stores; (b) Drugstores; (c) Variety stores; (d) Hardware stores; (e) Shoe repair shops; (f) Book stores; (g) Gift shops; (h) Stationery stores; (i) Music stores; 0) Flower shops; (k) Specialty shops; (I) Beauty shops; (m) Barber shops; (n) Cleaning and laundry agencies, including coin-operated; (0) Business and professional offices; (p) Pet shops; (q) Real estate offices; (r) Insurance offices; (s) Bookkeeping offices; (t) Public schools; (u) Delicatessens, specialized food stores and coffee shops; (v) Bake shops employing no more than four (4) persons on the premises; (w) Churches; (x) Public utility distribution and transmission line towers and poles and underground facilities for the distribution of gas, water, communications, and electricity; and (y) Reverse vending machines. Compatibility with Adjacent Uses The proposed Neighborhood Commercial parcel will abut existing low density single family homes to the south and an existing church with ancillary church uses to the east. The existing structure was designed for administrative/office uses and is not conducive for residential purposes. In order to have a conforming use in the Low Density Residential zoning district, the existing structure would need to be demolished and rebuilt for residential purposes. The existing use will be compatible to the surrounding neighborhood as there are similar uses existing to the west (Emerson Eye Car) and to the north (Golden Valley Medical Services) of the project site. The proposed zone change will provide a conforming use where a non-conforming use previously existed. PUBLIC COMMENT: A public hearing notice was published in the Los Banos Enterprise and notices were mailed out to property owners within a 300' radius of the Project site on July 24, 2015. As of the date of this report no comments have been received. Reviewed by: ~ L/1-.-'V'------Steve Carrigan, City Manager Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Resolution Exhibit A: CEQA Findings Exhibit B: Findings for Approval Exhibit C: Conditions of Approval 3. General Plan Land Use Map 4. Zoning Map 5. Public Hearing Notice - July 24,2015 ORDINANCE NO. 1132 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP BY REZONING PROPERTY LOCATED AT 745 WEST J STREET FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (C-N) The City Council of the City of Los Banos does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. The property described as 745 West J Street, more specifically identified as Assessor's Parcel Number: 027-094-005 is hereby rezoned as shown on said map from Low Density Residential (R-1) to Neighborhood Commercial (C-N). Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the appropriate markings on the Official Zoning Map in conformance with this Ordinance and the provisions of the Los Banos Municipal Code. Section 3. This Ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and operation thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be posted and published once within fifteen days after passage and adoption as may be required by law; or, in the alternative the City Clerk may cause to be published a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the Office of the City Clerk five days prior to the date of adoption of this Ordinance; and, within fifteen days after adoption, the City Clerk shall cause to be published, the aforementioned summary and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, together with the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk. Introduced by Council Member Faria and seconded by Council Member Silveira Passed on the __ day of , 2015 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: APPROVED: Michael Villalta, Mayor ATTEST: Lucille L. Mallonee, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. SCo&Co A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT #2015-02 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 745 WEST J STREET, MORE SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 027-094-005 WHEREAS, CAMNIC LLC, as the project applicant, has requested an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Policy Map; and WHEREAS, the Los Banos General Plan was adopted in July 2009, and is the guiding document for land use in the City of Los Banos; and WHEREAS, the proposal is consistent with the intent of the General Plan and the Zoning Code regulations; and WHEREAS, the proposal is consistent with surrounding properties and the area in general; and WHEREAS, the Los Banos Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 8, 2015 for the purpose of considering General Plan Amendment #2015-02 and Zone Change #2015-02 and at the completion of the public hearing, duly considered the evidence presented and recommended approval to the Los Banos City Council; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was duly noticed for the Los Banos City Council meeting of August 5, 2015, in accordance with California Government Code Section 65091 by advertisement in the Los Banos Enterprise and by mail to property owners within 300 feet of the project boundaries on July 24, 2015 to consider and take testimony regarding General Plan Amendment #2015-02 and Zone Change #2015-02 for 745 West J Street; and WHEREAS, at the August 5, 2015 and August 19, 2015 City Council Meetings the Los Banos City Council, heard and considered testimony, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard; reviewed the Project and staff report; studied the compatibility of the applicant's request with adjacent land uses; has considered the applicant's request in accordance with the General Plan Amendment criteria established in Section 9 3.2314 of the Los Banos Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Los Banos hereby makes the appropriate findings set forth in Exhibit A (California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Findings), and Exhibit B (Findings for Approval), attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Los Banos does hereby approve a General Plan Amendment for the property located at 745 West J Street; more specifically identified as Assessor's Parcel Number: 027-094-005, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Los Banos held on the 19th day of August 2015, by Council Member ___ who moved its adoption, which motion was duly seconded by Council Member ___ and the Resolution adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: APPROVED: Michael VillaIta, Mayor ATTEST: Lucille L. Mallonee, City Clerk 2 EXHIBIT A CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 745 WEST J STREET, MORE SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 027·094·005 Pursuant to the requirements of California Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. ("CEQA") and Title 14, California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq. (the "CEQA Guidelines"), the City as Lead Agency under CEQA adopts the following findings required by CEQA, along with the facts and evidence upon which each finding is based. The City of Los Banos City Council hereby finds as follows: 1. Pursuant to CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Los Banos Environmental Guidelines, the project was evaluated within the context of those guidelines and found to be categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA per Article 19, Section 15301 for existing facilities. 2. General Plan Amendment #2015-02 and Zone Change #2015-02 was adequately noticed on July 24, 2015 for consideration at a public meeting on August 5,2015. 3. On the basis of the whole record, including public comment, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the Project may have a significant effect on the environment. 4. The environmental analysis was prepared in compliance with CEQA and on the basis of the whole record, there is no substantial evidence of significant new information or changes in the environmental setting have occurred that would result in new or greater significant effects. 5. The City of Los Banos Planning Department, located at 520 J Street in Los Banos, is the custodian of the documents that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the determination to adopt the negative declaration is based and will be certified by the Los Banos City Council. 6. Prior to considering the proposed Project, the City Council considered the Categorical Exemption. EXHIBIT B FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 745 WEST J STREET, MORE SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 027-094-005 The City of Los Banos City Council hereby finds as follows: 1. As described in the Project staff report, the proposal is consistent with the Los Banos General Plan and Zoning Ordinance as it meets the use and development standards specified within. Evidence. The original use of the property as an administrative building is not being proposed to be changed. The property currently consists of an administrative office building which is a permitted use in the Neighborhood Commercial (C-N) Zoning District per the text of the Zoning Code. The proposed use is consistent with the Los Banos General Plan as the proposal is compatible in scale and character with existing uses and the policies regarding economic development within. 2. The proposal will not be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing and working in the City of Los Banos, or injurious to property or improvements in the surrounding neighborhoods or within the City. Evidence. The Neighborhood Commercial (C-N) use will be compatible with the surrounding uses. The existing use of the administrative office building on the property is compatible with the adjacent commercial and residential uses. 3. The proposed Neighborhood Commercial (C-N) zoning is compatible with the adjacent land uses, properties, and neighborhoods and will not be detrimental or injurious to the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the City. Evidence. The Neighborhood Commercial use matches the surrounding uses and is compatible with adjacent neighborhoods. EXHIBIT C CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 745 WEST J STREET, MORE SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 027-094-005 1. Upon approval, the property is to be utilized in a manner appropriate with the Neighborhood Commercial General Plan Designation and the existing structure must be used in accordance with the density standards specified within the Los Banos General Plan 2. Upon approval, the property is to be utilized in a manner appropriate with the CoN (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning Classification for the existing structure must be used in accordance with the uses specified within the Los Banos Municipal Code. EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP 838 834 848 841 848 907 'gend ,sBanos_GPLU 'LU Agriculture/Rural II Civic/Institutional _Commercial Employment Park I] High Density Residential Industrial :J Low Density Residential :J Medium Density Residential II Mixed Use • Neighborhood Commercial II Park 0l·n~~~;:.;:.:..;';':",AU:";_ «CL ~ (9 Z Z o N (9 Z I (j) -X W ... coM LOS Banos .. e ....-. ..3 two COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Date: July 24,2015 Regarding: Notice of Public Hearing Proposal: General Plan Amendment #2015-02 and Zone Change #2015-02 - 745 W. J Street NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT a Public Hearing will be held by the Los Banos Los Banos City Council to consider General Plan Amendment #2015-02 and Zone Change #2015-02 for CAMNIC LLC. The project proposal is for the General Plan Amendment for one (1) parcel currently designated Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial and to re-zone the same property from Low Density Residential (R-1) to Neighborhood Commercial (C-N) to utilize the property for administrative services. The project site is located at 745 W. J Street, more specifically identified as Assessor's Parcel Number: 027-094-005. The Los Banos Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 8, 2015 for the purpose of considering the above mentioned project. At the completion of the pUblic hearing, the Planning Commission recommended approval of General Plan Amendment #2015-02 and Zone Change #2015-02 to the Los Banos City Council. A PUBLIC HEARING on this matter will be held at the next scheduled meeting of the City Council on Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Los Banos City Hall located at 520 "J" Street. Questions regarding the above referenced item may be directed to Stacy Souza Elms, Assistant Planner II at City Hall or at (209) 827-7000, Ext. 133. Persons wishing to provide oral comments on the proposed project may do so at this meeting or may provide written comments on this matter prior to the public meeting. Written comments may be sent by U.S. Mail or hand delievered to the City of Los Banos City Hall at 520 "J" Street, Los Banos, California 93635. Please be advised that should the action by the City Council be challenged in court, you may be limited to only those issues raised at the public hearings or by written comment per Government Code Section 65009. THE CITY OF LOS BANOS Stacy Souza Elms Assistant Planner \I LOS Banos Agenda Staff Re~ TO: Mayor Villalta & City Council Members FROM: Stacy Souza Elms, Senior Planner ~ DATE: August 19, 2015 SUBJECT: Hook & Ladder Hot Wings Conditional Use Permit #2015-08 for On-Sale Beer and Wine in Conjunction with a Type 41 Alcohol License TYPE OF REPORT: Public Hearing Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit #2015-08 for the on-sale of beer and wine for Hook & Ladder Hot Wings located at 245 W. Pacheco Blvd., Suites A & B Background: On July 22,2015, the Los Banos Planning Commission held a Public Hearing to review a request for a Conditional Use Permit for the on-sale of beer and wine for Hook & Ladder Hot Wings located at 245 W. Pacheco Blvd., Suites A & B. At the Public Hearing, the Planning Commission considered the application including the report and presentation by staff and public comment. As the recommend body, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Conditional Use Permit #2005-08 to the Los Banos City Council. Discussion: The applicant, Mindi Paris, is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for the on-sale of beer and wine for an eating place in conjunction with a Type 41 alcohol license to permit the on-sale of beer and wine for Hook & Ladder Hot Wings located at 245 W. Pacheco Blvd., Suites A & B. The applicant is proposing to establish a firehouse themed restaurant which will serve hot wings, firehouse chili, specialty salads, burgers, corndogs, fries, funnel cake, and other items. The restaurant will provide a family atmosphere with TVs available to watch sports. The hours of operation will be from 10:00 a.m. to 11 :00 p.m., seven days a week. The applicant is anticipating having the restaurant operational by October 1, 2015 and is looking to hire 6 to 8 employees. The restaurant is located within the Conte Plaza, which currently is the site for retail and service establishments: Baskin Robbins, Best Western Hotel, TTK Pawn Shop, Hair Pros, CA Sleep Center, Banuelos Hair Salon, Academy Mortgage, and Aldina Real Estate. LOCATION AND ACCESS: The project site is located at 245 W. Pacheco Blvd., Suites A & B, more specifically identified as Assessor's Parcel Number: 027-161-042. LAND USE: Property Land Use Zone General Plan Project site Commercial H-C C North Commercial H-C C South Commercial H-C C East Commercial H-C C West Commercial H-C C H-C = Highway Commercial C =Commercial ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City of Los Banos Environmental Quality Guidelines, it has been determined that this project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA - Article 19, Section 15301. The applicant's request for the on-sale of beer and wine in conjunction with an eating place involves the permitting and licensing of an existing private structure and involves no expansion at 245 W. Pacheco Blvd., Suites A & B. USE PERMIT ANALYSIS Code Requirements Pursuant to the Los Banos Municipal Code Section 9-3.2322, a Conditional Use Permit is required for any establishment dispensing for sale or other consideration alcoholic beverages, including beer and wine, for on-sale or off-sale. The Planning Commission is the recommending body and the City Council is the decision making body for Conditional Use Permits for the on-sale and off-sale of alcoholic beverages. A Conditional Use Permit may be granted if the proposed use is conforming to the following criteria: General Use Permit Criteria: 1. That the proposed use and project is consistent with the City of Los Banos General Plan, and Los Banos Municipal Code; 2. That the proposed use or project will not be a nuisance or detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, comfort, and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use; 3. That the proposed use is compatible with the adjacent uses, properties and neighborhoods and will not be detrimental or injurious to property and improvement in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the City. Specific On-Sale and Off-Sale Alcoholic Beverages Criteria: 1. That the proposal will not contribute to undue proliferation of such uses in an area where additional ones would be undesirable with consideration given to the area's function and character, problems of crime and loitering, and traffic problems and capacity; 2. That the proposal wili not adversely affect adjacent or nearby churches, temples, or synagogues; public, parochial, or private elementary, junior high, or high schools; public parks or recreation centers; or public or parochial playgrounds; 3. That the proposal will not interfere with the movement of people along an important pedestrian street; and 4. That where the proposed use is in close proximity to residential uses, and especially to bedroom windows, the use will be limited in hours of operation, or designed operated so as to avoid the disruption of residents' sleep between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Staff has evaluated the proposal pursuant to the above criteria set forth in the Municipal Code and offers the following observations: The project will not contribute to the proliferation of alcohol in the area or cause an increase in crime in that the proposed use will be ancillary to the primary use as a restaurant and will be an accessory use to the serving of food. The area is not a high crime area nor prone to loitering or traffic issues. Historically there have been several restaurants in this location which have operated harmoniously with the surrounding area. The proposal will not adversely affect adjacent or nearby churches, temples, or synagogues; public, parochial, or private elementary, junior high, or high schools; public parks or recreation centers; or public or parochial playgrounds. The proposed use is not in close proximity to any of these types of uses. The proposal will not have an effect on the movement of people in that there will be no off-site or public consumption of alcohol pursuant to ABC regulations. All sales will be conducted within the premises and in conjunction with food. The closest residence is more than 100 feet from the entrance of the building. In addition, the project will be subject to conditions which will mitigate any adverse affects on the surrounding neighborhood. Hours of operation will start after 7:00 a.m. and end at 11 :00 p.m. Alcoholic Beverage Control The Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (ABC) is the issuing authority for a Type 41 alcohol license. The City's authority for the sale of alcohol is through its land use powers embodied within the Los Banos Zoning Code. ABC has the authority according to Section 23801 of the Business and Professions Code to exercise certain conditions under the license, the personal qualifications of the licensee, the conduct of the business or the condition of the premises, which will protect the public welfare and morals, including, but not limited to, the following: a) Restrictions as to hours of sale b) Display of signs c) Employment of designated persons d) Types and strengths of alcoholic beverages to be served where such types or strengths are otherwise limited by law e) The portion of the privileges to be exercised under the license f) The personal conduct of the licensee ABC may also refuse to issue a license to any person who has violated the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, has a disqualifying criminal record, or is otherwise disqualified. Census Tract The project site is located in census tract 23.01. As of the date of this report, there are nine (9) on-sale licenses currently in use in this specific census tract. According to Section 23817.5 of the Business and Professions Code there are no limitations to how many on-sale beer and wine licenses may be issued in a census tract. Limitations are only specified for off-sale of beer and wine and off-sale general licenses. License Business Name Premises Address Type1 41 Suqoi Rolls & BBQ 1245 E. Pacheco Blvd. 41 Taqueria EI Rodeo 1313 E. Pacheco Blvd., Ste. D 41 Mountain Mikes Pizza 509 Pacheco Blvd. 41 Pizza Hut 419 Pacheco Blvd. 41 Hot City BBQ & Bistro 1313 S. Sixth St. 41 China Garden 829 W. Pacheco Blvd. 41 Black Bear Diner 955 W. Pacheco Blvd. 41 Eddie's Famous Cafe 401 W. Pacheco Blvd. 41 China No. 1 Buffet (pendinq) 1313 E. Pacheco Blvd., Ste. A Type 41 license = On-sale beer and wine Type 47 license =On-sale general alcohol I California Department ofAlcoholic Beverage Control http://www.abc.ca.gov/datport/AHCityRep.asp PUBLIC COMMENT: A public hearing notice was published in the Los Banos Enterprise and notices were provided to adjacent property owners within a 300 foot radius of the subject property on August 7,2015. As of the date of this staff report, no comments have been received. Reviewed by: 5fi:~-- Steve Carrigan, City Manager Attachments: 1. Resolution Exhibit A CEQA Findings Exhibit B Project Findings Exhibit C Conditions of Approval 2. Floor Plan 3. Site Photos 4. Public Hearing Notice - August 7,2015 RESOLUTION NO. __ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #2015-08 FOR THE ON-SALE OF BEER AND WINE FOR HOOK & LADDER HOT WINGS LOCATED AT 245 W. PACHECO BLVD., SUITES A &B WHEREAS, the applicant, Mindi Paris, has requested that the City of Los Banos consider a Conditional Use Permit to allow the use of a Type 41 alcohol license for the on-sale of beer and wine in conjunction with an eating place for Hook & Ladder Hot Wings located at 245 W. Pacheco Blvd., Suites A & B, more specifically identified as Assessor's Parcel Number: 027-161-042; and WHEREAS, a public hearing notice was published in the Los Banos Enterprise on July 10, 2015 and notices were mailed to property owners within a 300 foot radius of the project site as required by the Los Banos Municipal Code and Government Code Section 65091; and WHEREAS, the Los Banos Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 22, 2015 for the purpose of considering Conditional Use Permit #2015-08 and at the completion of the public hearing, duly considered the evidence presented and recommended approval of Conditional Use Permit #2015-08 to the Los Banos City Council; and WHEREAS, the Los Banos City Council has held a public hearing, reviewed said Conditional Use Permit request and staff report, has studied the compatibility of the applicant's request with adjacent land uses and has considered this request in accordance with the Conditional Use Permit criteria established in Section 9-3.2322 of the Los Banos Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City of Los Banos Environmental Quality Guidelines, Conditional Use Permit #2015-08 for Hook & Ladder Hot Wings was determined to be categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA per Article 19, Section 15301 as the project site is an existing facility; and WHEREAS, the request/proposed use satisfies the criteria of the Los Banos Municipal Code. BASED UPON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, the City Council of the City of Los Banos hereby make the appropriate findings set forth in Exhibit A (California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Findings), and Exhibit B (Findings for Approval), attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Los Banos does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit #2015-08 to allow the on-sale of beer and wine for an eating place in conjunction with an ABC License, Type 41, on-sale beer and wine for Hook & Ladder Hot Wings located at 245 W. Pacheco Blvd., Suites A & B, more specifically identified as Assessor's Parcel Number: 027-161-042, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Los Banos held on the 19th day of August 2015, by Council Member ___ who moved its adoption, which motion was duly seconded by Council Member ___ and the Resolution adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: APPROVED: Michael Villalta, Mayor ATIEST: Lucille L. Mallonee, City Clerk 2 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS, ADOPTING THE 2014 MERCED COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Disaster Mitigation and Cost Reduction Act of 2000, was signed into law on October 30, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 requires all jurisdictions to be covered by a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) to be eligible for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) post-disaster funds; and WHEREAS, the City of Los Banos has committed to participate in the development of the Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan; and WHEREAS, this Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan meets the goal of mitigating natural disasters in the Merced County and the cities of Los Banos, Atwater, and livingston; and WHEREAS, the City of Los Banos participated in the development of the City of Los Banos Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex; and WHEREAS, the City of Los Banos' is concerned about mitigating potential losses from natural disasters before they occur, and WHEREAS, the plan identifies potential hazards, potential loses and potential mitigation measures to limit loses, and WHEREAS, Federal Emergency Management Agency has tentatively approved the plan; and WHEREAS, formal adoption of the plan by the City Council of Los Banos is required before final approval of the plan can be obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency; and WHEREAS, The City of Los Banos has determined that it would be in the best interest of the City of Los Banos to adopt the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan with its local annex. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Los Banos adopts with its local annex, the Merced County multi-jurisdictional plan as its Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Los Banos commits to continuing to take those actions and initiating further actions, as appropriate, as identified in the City Annex of that mUlti-jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan by adopting the mitigation strategies and by including policies and implement measures that reiterate the City's commitment to the LHMP in the Safety Element of its General Plan. The foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Los Banos held on the __ day of 2015, by City Council Member , who moved its adoption, which motion was duly seconded by City Council Member , and the Resolution was adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: APPROVED: Michael Villalta, Mayor ATIEST: Lucille L. Mallonee, City Clerk EXHIBIT A CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #2015·08 - HOOK & LADDER HOT WINGS Pursuant to the requirements of California Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. ("CEQA") and Title 14, California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq. (the "CEQA Guidelines"), the City as Lead Agency under CEQA adopts the following findings required by CEQA, along with the facts and evidence upon which each finding is based. The City of Los Banos City Council hereby finds as follows: 1. Pursuant to CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Los Banos Environmental Quality Guidelines, Conditional Use Permit #2015-08 was evaluated and determined to be categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301 as the request for the on-sale of beer and wine in conjunction with an eating place involves the permitting and licensing of an existing private structure and involves no expansion at 245 W. Pacheco Blvd., Suites A & B. 2. Conditional Use Permit #2015-08 was adequately noticed on August 7, 2015 for consideration at a public meeting on August 19, 2015. 3. No further environmental documentation is required as the Conditional Use Permit was contemplated and adequately analyzed in the initial review. 4. Prior to considering the proposed Project, the City Council considered the Categorical Exemption. EXHIBIT B FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #2015·08 HOOK & LADDER HOT WINGS A. General Findings 1. That the proposed use and project is consistent with the City of Los Banos general plan, and the Los Banos Municipal Code. Evidence: The site is designated Commercial and zoned Highway Commercial. Commercial uses do include restaurant establishments which permit on-sale alcohol. 2. That the proposed use or project will not be a nuisance or detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, comfort, and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use. Evidence: The proposed use will be conducted within a commercial center and will not result in significant operational changes to the existing commercial area. The areas function and character is Highway Commercial, which includes restaurants that serve alcohol 3. That the proposed use is compatible with the adjacent uses, properties, and neighborhoods and will not be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the City. Evidence: The proposed use will be conducted within a commercial center and will not result in significant operational changes to the existing commercial area. B. Specific Findings 1. That the proposal will not contribute to undue proliferation of such uses in an area where additional ones would be undesirable with consideration given to the area's function and character, problems of crime and loitering, and traffic problems and capacity. Evidence: As reflected in the staff report, the number of on-sale licenses in the Census Tract is currently nine (9). The addition of one more license will not contribute to the proliferation of alcohol sales as the on-sale of beer and wine will be in conjunction with food. The uses of alcohol are not concentrated along the Pacheco Corridor as it spans from Ortigalita Road to Mercey Springs Road. 2. That the proposal will not adversely affect adjacent or nearby churches, temples, or synagogues; public, parochial, or private elementary, junior high, or high schools; public parks or recreation centers; or public or parochial playgrounds. Evidence: There are no such types of uses in the immediate area. The closest school is on the other side of Pacheco Blvd. (SR 152) and the nearest church is south of this commercial plaza, but has no immediate access to the Project site as it is separated by a masonry wall. The City Council considered the surrounding area and nearby uses and determined that there was no evidence of adverse impacts to adjacent or nearby churches, temples, or synagogues, nearby parks, recreation centers or playgrounds. 3. That the proposal will not interfere with the movement of people along an important pedestrian street. Evidence: Consumption of alcohol will only be allowed inside the premises and the use will be regulated by City, State and Federal regulations. 4. That where the proposed use is in close proximity to residential uses, and especially to bedroom windows, the use will be limited in hours of operation, or designed operated so as to avoid the disruption of residents' sleep between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Evidence: The hours of operation start after 7 am and end at 11 pm; however, the use will not be in close proximity to residential uses and is located within an existing commercial plaza. Consumption of alcohol is not allowed outside of the premises per the conditions of approval and city ordinance. The nearest residential window is located at least 100 feet away from the front entrance to the restaurant. Based upon these considerations the City Council finds that there is no evidence that the use will cause disruption of sleep. EXHIBIT C CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #2015·08 HOOK & LADDER HOT WINGS Planning: 1. Conditional Use Permit 2015-08 is for Hook & Ladder Hot Wings located at 245 W. Pacheco Blvd., Suites A & B; more specifically identified as Assessor's Parcel Number: 027-161-042 and the requested use shall expire after one (1) year from date of approval by the Los Banos City Council unless implemented. The City for cause may revoke this Conditional Use Permit. 2. The applicant/operator shall comply with all other requirements, laws and policies of other governmental agencies in the conduct and operation of said business. 3. The applicant/operator shall obtain and maintain an active Type 41 "On-Sale Beer and Wine Eating Place" license as defined by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and shall provide a copy of said license upon issuance by the Alcoholic Beverage Control to the Community Development Department prior to the sale of alcohol on the premises. 4. A copy of these Conditions of Approval and the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control license are required to be kept on the premises and presented to any law enforcement officer or authorized City official upon request. 5. The applicant/operator shall be responsible for maintaining the property free of litter at all times in the parking lot area and the areas adjacent to the premises over which they have control. 6. The Planning Commission shall have the right to review and/or revoke this permit should the applicant not adhere to the Conditions of Approval. The City may amend or impose new conditions to mitigate adverse affects in the neighborhood resulting from the use of alcohol on the premises. 7. The applicant/operator agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City of Los Banos, its officers, agents and employees from any and all liability or claims that may be brought against the City of Los Banos arising out of its approval of this permit, or the environmental determination rendered in connection with the permit approval, or arising out of the operation of the use or uses allowed under the permit, save and except that caused solely by the City's active negligence. 8. The exterior of the premises, including adjacent public sidewalks and the parking lot areas, shall be illuminated during all hours of darkness when the premises are open for business in a manner so that persons standing in those areas at night are identifiable by law enforcement personnel. 9. The premises shall be operated primarily as an eating place (restaurant) as described in the application prepared by the applicant and filed with the Community and Economic Development Department. Any substantial or significant changes in use or operation of the premises from the Operational Statement may cause a review, amendment or revocation of the Use Permit. 10. The use of the premises of the subject site shall be consistent with the Conditions of Approval and shall not be operated in a manner that deviates from the approved Conditional Use Permit filed application and operational statement, which shall constitute a violation and may result in the revocation or modification of the permit upon written notice to the owner of the subject site. 11.Authorization of a Conditional Use Permit granted pursuant to the provisions of Section 9-3.2322 of the Los Banos Municipal Code shall run with the land and shall continue to be valid upon change of ownership of the site or structure which was the sUbject of the Conditional Use Permit application provided the use shall be subject to all provisions of the Municipal Code and all conditions placed on approval of the Conditional Use Permit are continually met. 245 W PACHECO BLVD SUITS A & B 1739 SQFT BATHROOM BATHROOM OFFICE - - - I DINNING AREA CLEANING BASIN KITCHEN . _.._... _... _.... _...... - ... _..- .... LOS Banos _ ..... ,srr ...... _"'.=- .". ..="" COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Date: August 7,2015 Regarding: Notice of Public Hearing Proposal: Conditional Use Permit #2015-08 - Type 41 Alcohol License NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT a Public Hearing will be held by the Los Banos City Councuil to consider a Conditional Use Permit to allow the use of a Type 41 Alcohol License for the on-sale of beer and wine in conjunction with an eating establishment. The requested Conditional Use Permit is for Hook and Ladder Hot Wings located at 245 W. Pacheco Blvd., Suites A & B, more specifically described as Assessor's Parcel Number: 027-161-042. The Los Banos Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 22, 2015 for the purpose of considering the above mentioned project. At the completion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission duly considered all evidence presented and recommended approval of Conditional Use Permit #2015-08 to the Los Banos City Council. A PUBLIC HEARING on this matter will be held at the next scheduled meeting of the Los Banos City Council on Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Los Banos City Hall located at 520 "J" Street. Questions regarding the above-referenced item may be directed to Stacy Souza Elms, Assistant Planner II at City Hall or at (209) 827-7000, Ext. 133. Persons wishing to provide oral comments on the proposed project may do so at this meeting or may provide written comments on this matter prior to the public meeting. Written comments may be sent by U.S. Mail or hand delivered to the City of Los Banos City Hall at 520 "J" Street, Los Banos, California 93635. Please be advised that should this matter, at some future date go to court, testimony shall be limited to only those issues raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City prior to, or at, the pUblic hearing per Government Code Section 65009. THE CITY OF LOS BANOS Stacy Souza Elms Assistant Planner II LOS Banos Agenda Staff ReRQ!! TO: Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Tim Marrison, Fire Chief/Building Official DATE: August 19,2015 SUBJECT: Ordinance Streamline/Expedite Permitting Procedures for Small Residential Rooftop Solar Systems TYPE OF REPORT: Public Hearing Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council waive the first reading and introduction of: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE LOS BANOS MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 6 TO PROVIDE AN EXPEDITED, STREAMLINED PERMITTING PROCESS FOR SMALL RESIDENTIAL ROOFTOP SOLAR SYSTEMS". Background: In September 2014, the California State Legislature passed, and the Governor signed, Assembly Bill 2188 (AB 2188), which requires local agencies to have expedited permit processing for small residential rooftop solar energy systems. AB 2188 provides that it is the policy ofthe State to promote and encourage the installation and use of solar energy systems by limiting obstacles to their use and by minimizing the permitting costs of such systems. In furtherance of that objective, Section 65850.5(g)(l) of the California Government Code requires that, on or before September 30, 2015, every city, county, or city and county must adopt an ordinance that creates a streamlined/expedited permitting process for small residential rooftop solar energy systems. Discussion: The City currently streamlines the review of such applications. The City also currently can accept and approve such applications (at the building counter and/or electronically through the City's website or fax). The City, then by current process, already streamlines/expedites the review of such applications. Staff anticipates little change to the City's pennit issuance procedures in order to comply with the requirements ofAB2188. The City, however, is required to adopt the ordinance mandated by Section 65850.5(g)(I). The attached ordinance is intended to satisfy the required content of AB2188 and the deadline of September 30,2015. The ordinance codifies the requirements of Section 65850.5(g)(I), such as accepting and approving applications electronically, directing the City's Building Official to develop a checklist of all requirements with which small rooftop solar energy systems shall comply to be eligible for expedited review, and authorizing the Building Official to administratively approve such applications. Fiscal Impact: There is no anticipated fiscal impact as the costs would be recovered through existing building pennit fees. As noted, the Building Department is currently providing streamline reviews and electronic submittal ofapplications for small residential rooftop solar systems. Reviewed by: 5uvv LU~ Sonya Willi , Finance Director Steve Carrigan, City Manager Attachments: AB2188 Proposed Ordinance Notice ofPublic Hearing Assembly Bill No. 2188 CHAPTER 521 An act to amend Section 714 of the Civil Code, and to amend Section 65850.5 ofthe Government Code, relating to solar energy. [Approved by Governor September 21, 20J4. Filed with Secretary of State September 21, 2014.] LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 2188, Muratsuchi. Solar energy: pennits. (I) Existing law provides that it is the policy ofthe state to promote and encourage the use ofsolar energy systems, as defined, and to limit obstacles to their use. Existing law states that the implementation of consistent statewide standards to achieve timely and cost-effective installation ofsolar energy systems is not a municipal affair, but is instead a matter ofstatewide concern. Existing law requires a city or county to administratively approve applications to install solar energy systems through the issuance ofa building permit or similar nondiscretionary pennit. Existing law requires a solar energy system for heating water to be certified by the Solar Rating Certification Corporation or another nationally recognized certification agency. This bill would specify that these provisions address a statewide concern. The bill would additionally require a city, county, or city and county to adopt, on or before September 30, 2015, in consultation with specified public entities an ordinance that creates an expedited, streamlined permitting process for small residential rooftop solar energy systems, as specified. The bill would additionally require a city, county, or city and county to inspect a small residential rooftop solar energy system eligible for expedited review in a timely manner, as specified. The bill would prohibit a city, county, or city and county from conditioning the approval ofany solar energy system permit on approval ofiliat system by an association that manages a common interest development. The bill would require a solar energy system for heating water in single family residences and solar collectors for heating water in commercial or swimming pool applications to be certified by an accredited listing agency, as defined. Because the bill would impose new duties upon local govenunents and local agencies, it would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law prohibits any covenant, restriction, or condition contained in any deed, contract, security instrument, or other instrument affecting the transfer or sale of: or any interest in, real property, and any provision of a governing document from effectively prohibiting or restricting the installation or use ofa solar energy system. Existing law exempts from that prohibition provisions that impose reasonable restrictions on a solar energy 91 Ch.521 -2- system that do not significantly increase the cost of the system or significantly decrease its efficiency or specified perfonnance. Existing law defines the term "significantly,"' for these purposes, with regard to solar domestic water heating systems or solar swimming pool heating systems that comply with state and federal law, to mean an amount exceeding 20% of the cost of the system or decreasing the efficiency of the solar energy system by an amount exceeding 20%, and with regard to photovoltaic systems that comply with state and federal law, an amount not to exceed $2,000 over the system cost or a decrease in system efficiency ofan amount exceeding 20%, as specified. Existing law requires a solar energy system for heating water subject to the provisions described above to be certified by the Solar Rating Certification Corporation or another nationally recognized certification agency. This bill would instead define the term "significantly,"' for these purposes, with regard to solar domestic water heating systems or solar swimming pool heating systems that comply with state and federal law, to mean an amount exceeding 10% ofthe cost ofthe system, not to exceed $1 ,000, or decreasing the efficiency ofthe solar energy system by an amount exceeding 10%, and with regard to photovoltaic systems that comply with state and federallaw, an amount not to exceed $1 ,000 over the system cost or a decrease in system efficiency ofan amount exceeding 10%, as specified. The bill would require a solar energy system for heating water in single family residences and solar collectors for heating water in commercial or swimming pool applications subject to the provisions described above to be certified by an accredited listing agency, as defined. (3) Existing law requires an application for approval for the installation or use of a solar energy system to be processed and approved by the appropriate approving entity in the same manner as an application for approval ofan architectural modification to the property and prohibits the approver from willfully avoiding or delaying approval. Existing law requires the approving entity to notify the applicant in writing within 60 days of receipt of the application ifthe application is denied, as specified. The bill would instead require the approving entity to notify the applicant in writing within 45 days of receipt ofthe application ifthe application is denied, as specified. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. The people ofthe Slate ofCalifornia do enact as follows: SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all ofthe following: (a) In recent years, the state has both encouraged the development of innovative distributed generation technology and prioritized the widespread 91 -3- Ch.521 adoption of solar power as a renewable energy resource through programs such as the California Solar Initiative. (b) Rooftop solar energy is a leading renewable energy technology that will help this state reach its energy and environmental goals. (c) To reach the state's Million Sular Roofs goal, hundreds ofthuusands of additional rooftop solar energy systems will need to be deployed in the commg years. (d) Various studies, including one by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, show that, despite the 1978 California Solar Rights Act, declaring that the "Implementation of consistent statewide standards to achieve the timely and cost-effective installation ofsolar energy systems is not a municipal affair ... but is instead a matter of statewide concern," the permitting process governing the installation ofrooftop solar energy systems varies widely across jurisdictions and, contrary to the iiltent of the law, is both an "obstacle" to the state's clean energy and greenhouse reduction goals and a "burdensome cost" to homeowners, businesses, schools, and public agencies. (e) The United States Department of Energy, through its SunShot Initiative, has distributed millions of dollars in grants to local and state governments, including California jurisdictions, and nonprofit organizations to reduce the costs ofdistributed solar through streamlined and standardized permitting. (I) A modernized and standardized permitting process for installations ofsmall-scale solar distributed generation technology on residential rooftops will increase the deployment ofsolar distributed generation, help to expand access to lower income households, provide solar customers greater installation ease, improve the state's ability to reach its clean energy goals, and generate much needed jobs in the state, all while maintaining safety standards. SEC. 2. Section 714 ofthe Civil Code is amended to read: 714. (a) Any covenant, restriction, or condition contained in any deed, contract, security instrument, or other instrument affecting the transfer or sale of, or any interest in, real property, and any provision of a governing document, as defined in Section 4150 or 6552, that effectively prohibits or restricts the installation or use of a solar energy system is void and unenforceable. (b) This section does not apply to provisions that impose reasonable restrictions on solar energy systems. However, it is the policy of the state to promote and encourage the use of solar energy systems and to remove obstacles thereto. Accordingly, reasonable restrictions on a solar energy system are those restrictions that do not significantly increase the cost of the system or significantly decrease its efficiency or specified performance, or that allow for an alternative system ofcomparable cost, efficiency, and energy conservation benefits. (c) (I) A solar energy system shall meet applicable health and safety standards and requirements imposed by state and local pennitting authorities, consistent with Section 65850.5 ofthe Government Code. 91 Ch.521 -4- (2) Solar energy systems used for heating water in single family residences and solar collectors used for heating water in commercial or swimming pool applications shall be certified by an accredited listing agency as defined in the Plumbing and Mechanical Codes. (3) A solar energy system for producing electricity shall also meet all applicable safety and performance standards established by the California Electrical Code, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and accredited testing laboratories such as Underwriters Laboratories and, where applicable, rules of tbe Public Utilities Commission regarding safety and reliability. (d) For the purposes ofthis section: (I) (A) For solar domestic water heating systems or solar swimming pool heating systems that comply with state and federal law, "significantly" means an amount exceeding 10 percent of the cost ofthe system, but in no case more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or decreasing the efficiency ofthe solar energy system by an amount exceeding 10 percent, as originally specified and proposed. (B) For photovoltaic systems that comply with state and federal law, "significantly" means an amount not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1 ,000) over the system cost as originally specified and proposed. or a decrease in system efficiency ofan amount exceeding 10 percent as originally specified and proposed. (2) "Solar energy system" has the same meaning as defined in paragraphs (I) and (2) ofsubdivision (a) of Section 801.5. (e) (I) Whenever approval is required for the installation or use of a solar energy system, the application for approval shall be processed and approved by the appropriate approving entity in the same manner as an application for approval of an architectural modification to the property, and shall not be willfully avoided or delayed. (2) For an approving entity that is an association, as defined in Section 4080 or 6528, and that is not a public entiry, both of the following shall apply: (A) The approval or denial ofan application shall be in writing. (B) If an application is not denied in writing within 45 days from the date ofreceipt ofthe application, the application shall be deemed approved, unless that delay is the result of a reasonable request for additional information. (I) Any entity, other than a public entity, that willfully violates this section shall be liable to the applicant or other party for actual damages occasioned thereby, and shall pay a civil penalty to the applicant or other party in an amount not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). (g) In any action to enforce compliance with this section, the prevailing party shall be awarded reasonable attorney's fees. (h) (I) A public entity that fails to comply with this section may not receive funds from a state-sponsored grant or loan program for solar energy. A public entity shall certify its compliance with the requirements of this 91 -5- Ch.521 section when applying for funds from a state-sponsored grant or loan program. (2) A local public entity may not exempt residents in its jurisdiction from the requirements ofthis section. SEC. 3. Section 65850.5 of the Government Code is amended to read: 65850.5. (a) The implementation of consistent statewide standards to achieve the timely and cost-effective installation ofsolar energy systems is not a municipal affair, as that term is used in Section 5 ofArticle XI ofthe California Constitution, but is instead a matter of statewide concern. It is the intent of the Legislature that local agencies not adopt ordinances that create unreasonable barriers to the installation of solar energy systems, including, but not limited to, design review for aesthetic purposes, and not unreasonably restrict the ability ofhomeowners and agricultural and business concerns to install solar energy systems. It is the policy of the state to promote and encourage the use ofsolar energy systems and to limit obstacles to their use. It is the intent ofthe Legislature that local agencies comply not only with the language of this section, but also the legislative intent to encourage the installation of solar energy systems by removing obstacles to, and minimizing costs of, permitting for such systems. (b) A city or county shall administratively approve applications to install solar energy systems through the issuance of a building permit or similar nondiscretionary permit. Review ofthe application to install a solar energy system shall be limited to the building official's review ofwhether it meets all health and safety requirements of local, state, and federal law. The requirements oflocallaw shall be limited to those standards and regulations necessary to ensure that the solar energy system will not have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety. However, if the building official ofthe city or county makes a finding, based on substantial evidence, that the solar energy system could have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health and safety, the city or county may require the applicant to apply for a use permit. (c) A city, county, or city and county may not deny an application for a use pennit to install a solar energy system unless it makes written findings based upon substantial evidence in the record that the proposed installation would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety, and there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact. The findings shall include the basis for the rejection of potential feasible alternatives ofpreventing the adverse impact. (d) The decision ofthe building official pursuant to subdivisions (b) and (c) may be appealed to the planning commission ofthe city, county, or city and county. (e) Any conditions imposed on an application to install a solar energy system shall be designed to mitigate the specific, adverse impact upon the public health and safety at the lowest cost possible. (I) (1) A solar energy system shall meet applicable health and safety standards and requirements imposed by state and local pennitting authorities. 91 Ch.521 -6- (2) Solar energy systems for heating water in single family residences and solar collectors used for heating water in commercial or swimming pool applications shall be certified by an accredited listing agency as defined in the California Plumbing and Mechanical Codes. (3) A solar energy system for producing electricity shall meet all applicable safety and performance standards established by the California Electrical Code. the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and accredited testing laboratories such as Underwriters Laboratories and, where applicable, rules of the Public Utilities Commission regarding safety and reliability. (g) (I) On or before September 30, 2015, every city, county, or city and county, in consultation with the local fire department or district and the utility director, ifthe city, county, or city and county operates a utility, shall adopt an ordinance, consistent with the goals and intent ofsubdivision (a), that creates an expedited, streamlined permitting process for small residential rooftop solar energy systems. In developing an expedited permitting process, the city, county, or city and county shall adopt a checklist ofall requirements with which small rooftop solar energy systems shall comply to be eligible for expedited review. An application that satisfies the information requirements in the checklist, as determined by the city, county, and city and county, shall be deemed complete. Upon confirmation by the city, county, or city and county of the application and supporting documents being complete and meeting the requirements ofthe checklist, and consistent with the ordinance, a city, county, or city and county shall, consistent with subdivision (b), approve tbe application and issue all required permits or authorizations. Upon receipt of an incomplete application, a city, county, or city and county shall issue a written correction notice detailing all deficiencies in the application and any additional infonnation required to be eligible for expedited permit issuance. (2) The checklist and required permitting documentation shall be published on a publically accessible Internet Web site, if the city, county, or city and county has an Internet Web site, and the city, county, or city and county shall allow for electronic submittal of a permit application and associated documentation, and shall authorize the electronic signature on all forms, applications, and other documentation in lieu ofa wet signature by an applicant. In developing the ordinance, the city, county, or city and county shall substantially conform its expedited, streamlined permitting process with the recommendations for expedited permitting, including the checklists and standard plans contained in the most current version of the California Solar Permitting Guidebook and adopted by the Governor's Office of Planning and Research. A city, county, or city and county may adopt an ordinance that modifies the checklists and standards found in the gnidebook due to unique climactic, geological, seismological, or topographical conditions. If a city, county, or city and connty determines that it is unable to authorize the acceptance ofan electronic signature on all fonns, applications, and other documents in lieu of a wet signature by an applicant, the city, county, or city and county shall state, in the ordinance 91 -7- Ch.521 required under this subdivision, the reasons for its inability to accept electronic signatures and acceptance ofan electronic signature shall not be required. (h) For a small residential rooftop solar energy system eligible for expedited review, only one inspection shall be required, which shall be done in a timely manner and may include a consolidated inspection, except that a separate fire safety inspection may be performed in a city, county, or city and county that does not have an agreement with a local fire authority to conduct a fire safety inspection on behalf of the fire authority. If a small residential rooftop solar energy system fails inspection, a subsequent inspection is authorized, however the subsequent inspection need not conform to the requirements ofthis subdivision. (i) A city, county, or city and county shall not condition approval for any solar energy system permit on the approval of a solar energy system by an association, as that term is defined in Section 4080 ofthe Civil Code. (j) The following definitions apply to this section: (I) "A feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact" includes, but is not limited to, any cost-effective method, condition, or mitigation imposed by a city, county, or city and county on another similarly situated application in a prior successful application for a permit. A city, county, or city and county shall use its best efforts to ensure that the selected method, condition, or mitigation meets the conditions of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (I) of subdivision (d) of Section 714 ofthe Civil Code. (2) "Electronic submittal" means the utilization of one or more of the following: (A) Email. (B) The fnternet. (C) Facsimile. (3) "Small residential rooftop solar energy system" means all of the following: (A) A solar energy system that is no larger than 10 kilowatts alternating current nameplate rating or 30 kilowatts thermal. (B) A solar energy system that conforms to all applicable state fire, structural, electrical, and other building codes as adopted or amended by the city, county, or city and county and paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of Section 714 ofthe Civil Code. (C) A solar energy system that is installed on a single or duplex family dwelling. (D) A solar panel or module array that does not exceed the maximum legal building height as defined by the authority having jurisdiction. (4) "Solar energy system" has the same meaning set forth in paragraphs (1) and (2) ofsubdivision (a) of Section 801.5 ofthe Civil Code. (5) "Specific, adverse impact" means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified, and written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete. 91 Ch.521 -8- SEC. 4. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 ofArticle XIII B of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 ofthe Government Code. o 91 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE LOS BANOS MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 6 TO PROVIDE AN EXPEDITED, STREAMLINED PERMITTING PROCESS FOR SMALL RESIDENTIAL ROOFTOP SOLAR SYSTEMS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Los Banos seeks to implement AB 2188 (Chapter 521, Statutes 2014) through the creation of an expedited, streamlined permitting process for small residential rooftop solar energy systems; and WHEREAS, as set forth in Govermnent Code Section 65850.5(a) it is the policy of the State of California that local agencies encourage the installation of solar energy systems by removing obstacles to, and minimizing the costs of, permitting such energy systems; and WHEREAS, as set forth in Government Code Section 65850.5(g), cities must adopt an ordinance on or before September 30, 2015 that creates an expedited and streamlined permitting process for small residential rooftop solar energy systems; and WHEREAS, the ordinance must substantially conform with the recommendations set forth in the California Solar Permitting Guidebook, including the use of a checklist of all requirements that, if complied with, requires cities to approve the application and issue the applied for permits; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Los Banos finds that it is in the interest of the health, welfare and safety of the public to provide an expedited permitting process to encourage the effective development of solar technology; and WHEREAS, the City Council ofthe City of Los Banos finds that the following ordinance will have the effect of encouraging the installation of small residential solar energy systems and minimizing barriers, obstacles, and costs ofobtaining permits for their installation; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's environmental procedures, the City Council finds that the adoption of this ordinance is covered by CEQA General Rule Exemption [Section 15061(b)(3)] which exempts activities that can be seen with certainty to have no possibility for causing a significant effect on the environment. A significant effect is defined as, "a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in the physical conditions within the area," and the adoption ofthis Ordinance is therefore not subject to CEQA. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Title 8 of the Los Banos Municipal Code entitled "Building Regulations" is hereby amended to add Chapter 6, entitled "SMALL RESIDENTIAL ROOFTOP SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEM PERMIT PROCESS" commencing with Section 8-6.01 and concluding with Section 8-6.06 is hereby added to read in its entirety as follows: Chapter 6 SMALL RESIDENTIAL ROOFTOP SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEM PERMIT PROCESS Sec. 8-6.01 Purpose and Intent. The purpose and intent of this chapter is to provide an expedited, streamlined solar permitting process that complies with the Solar Rights Act and AB 2188 (Chapter 521, Statutes 2014, Gov't Code Section 65850.5) in order to achieve timely and cost-effective installations of small residential rooftop solar energy systems. This chapter encourages the use of solar systems by removing unreasonable barriers, minimizing costs to property owners and the City and expanding the ability of property owners to install solar energy systems. This chapter allows the City to achieve these goals while protecting the public health and safety. Sec. 8-6.02 Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, unless otherwise apparent from the context, certain words and phrases used in this chapter are defined as follows: (a) "Solar Energy System" means either ofthe following: (I) Any solar collector or other solar energy device whose primary purpose is to provide for the collection, storage, and distribution of solar energy for space heating, space cooling, electric generation, or water heating. (2) Any structural design feature of a building, whose primary purpose is to provide for the collection, storage, and distribution of solar energy for electricity generation, space heating or cooling, or for water heating. (b) "Small residential rooftop solar energy system" means all ofthe following: (I) A solar energy system that is no larger than 10 kilowatts alternating current nameplate rating or 30 kilowatts thern1al. (2) A solar energy system that conforms to all applicable state fire, structural, electrical, and other building codes as adopted or amended by the City, and all state and City health and safety standards. (3) A solar energy system that is installed on a single or duplex family dwelling. (4) A solar panel or module array that does not exceed the maximum legal building height as defined by the City. (c) "Electronic submittal" means the utilization of electronic e-mail or submittal via the internet, or facsimile transmission. (d) "Specific, adverse impact" means a significant, quantifiable, direct, unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified, and written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete. (e) "Reasonable restrictions" on a solar energy system are those restrictions that do not significantly increase the cost of the system or significantly decrease its efficiency or specified performance, or that allow for an alternative system of comparable cost, efficiency, and energy conservation benefits. (I) "Restrictions that do not significantly increase the cost of the system or decrease its efficiency or specified perforn1ance" means: (I) For Water Heater Systems or Solar Swimming Pool Heating Systems: an amount exceeding 10 percent (10%) of the cost of the system, but in no case more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or decreasing the efficiency of the solar energy system by an amount exceeding 10 percent (10%), as originally specified and proposed. (2) For Photovoltaic Systems: an amount not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) over the system cost as originally specified and proposed, or a decrease in system efficiency ofan amount exceeding 10 percent (10%) as originally specified and proposed. Sec. 8-6.03 Applicability. This chapter applies to the permitting of all small residential rooftop solar energy systems in the City. Small residential rooftop solar energy systems legally established or permitted prior to the effective date ofthe ordinance codified in this chapter are not subject to the requirements ofthis chapter unless physical modifications or alterations are undertaken that materially change the size, type, or components of a small rooftop energy system in such a way as to require new permitting. Routine operation and maintenance or like-kind replacements shall not require a permit. Sec. 8-6.04 Solar Energy System Requirements. (a) All solar energy systems shall meet applicable health and safety standards and requirements imposed by the state and the City. (b) Solar energy systems for heating water in single-family residences and for heating water in commercial or swimming pool applications shall be certified by an accredited listing agency as defined by the California Plumbing and Mechanical Code. (c) Solar energy systems for producing electricity shall meet all applicable safety and performance standards established by the California Electrical Code, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and accredited testing laboratories such as Underwriters Laboratories and, where applicable, rules ofthe Public Utilities Commission regarding safety and reliability. Sec. 8-6.05 Applications and Documents. (a) All documents required for the submission of an expedited solar energy system application shall be made available on the City website. (b) Electronic submittal ofthe required permit application and documents by email, or the Internet, or facsimile transmission shall be made available to all small residential rooftop solar energy system permit applicants. An applicant's electronic signature shall be accepted on all forms, applications, and other documents in lieu ofa wet signature. (c) The Building Department shall adopt a standard plan and checklist ofall requirements with which small residential rooftop solar energy systems shall comply to be eligible for expedited review. (d) The small residential rooftop solar system permit process, standard planes), and checklist(s) shall substantially conform to recommendations for expedited permitting, including the checklist and standard plans contained in the most current version of the California Solar Permitting Guidebook adopted by the Governor's Office ofPlanning and Research. (e) All fees prescribed for the permitting ofsmall residential rooftop solar energy systems shall comply with Government Code Sections 65850.55 and 66015 and Health & Safety Code Section 17951. Sec. 8-6.06 Permit Review and Inspection Requirements (a) The Chief Building Official shall implement an administrative, nondiscretionary review process to expedite approval of small residential rooftop solar energy systems applications. The Building Department shall complete the building permit approval or denial process, the issuance of which is nondiscretionary, on the same day for over-the-counter applications or between one and three business days where such over-the-counter approval is not authorized or feasible. The ChiefBuilding Official may require an applicant to apply for an Administrative Use Permit ifthe official finds, based on substantial evidence, that the solar energy system could have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health and safety. Such decisions may be appealed to the City Planning Commission as provided by the appeal procedure set forth in Part 6 ofArticle 23 ofthis Chapter 3 ofTitle 9 ofthe Municipal Code. (b) Review of the application shall be limited to the Chief Building Official's review of whether the application meets local, State, and Federal health and safety requirements. (c) If an Administrative Use Permit is required, the City may deny such application if it makes written findings based upon substantive evidence in the record that the proposed installation would have a specific, adverse impact upon public health or safety and there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid, as defined, the adverse impact. Such findings shall include the basis for the rejection of the potential feasible alternative for preventing the adverse impact. Such decisions may be appealed to the City Planning Commission as provided by the appeal procedure set forth in Part 6 of Article 23 of this Chapter 3 of Title 9 of the Municipal Code. (d) Any condition imposed on an application shall be designed to mitigate the specific, adverse impact upon health and safety at the lowest possible cost. (e) "A feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact" includes, but is not limited to, any cost-effective method, condition, or mitigation imposed by the City on another similarly situated application in a prior successful application for a permit. The City shall use its best efforts to ensure that the selected method, condition, or mitigation meets the conditions of Section 714(d) (I) (A)and(B) of the Civil Code defining restrictions that do not significantly increase the cost ofthe system or decrease its efficiency or specified performance. (f) If an application is deemed incomplete, a written correction notice detailing all deficiencies in the application and any additional infonnation or documentation required to be eligible for expedited permit issuance shall be sent to the applicant for resubmission. (g) Only one inspection shall be required and performed by the Building Department for small residential rooftop solar energy systems eligible for expedited review. (h) The inspection shall be done in a timely manner and should include consolidated inspections. (i) If a small residential rooftop solar energy system fails inspection, a subsequent inspection is authorized. Section 2. To the extent that the terms and provlSlons of this Ordinance may be inconsistent or in conflict with the terms or conditions of any prior City ordinance, motion, resolution, rule or regulation governing the same subject, the terms of this Ordinance shall prevail with respect to the subject matter thereof and such inconsistent or conflicting provisions ofprior ordinances, motions, resolutions, rules or regulations are hereby repealed. Section 3. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase added by this Ordinance, or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or invalid or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that anyone or more subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases are declared unconstitutional, invalid or ineffective. Section 4. The proposed amendments to the Los Banos Municipal Code do not propose any changes to City policies or regulations that would result in a direct or indirect physical environmental impact; therefore it has been deternlined that this ordinance amendment is covered by the general rule that the California Environmental Quality Act applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment pursuant to CEQA guidelines section 15601(b)(3) and is not subject to environmental review. Section 5. This Ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and operation thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption ofthis Ordinance and cause the same to be posted and published once within fifteen days after passage and adoption as may be required by law; or, in the alternative the City Clerk may cause to be published a summary ofthis Ordinance and a certified copy ofthe text ofthis Ordinance shall be posted in the Office of the City Clerk five days prior to the date of adoption of this Ordinance; and, within fifteen days after adoption, the City Clerk shall cause to be published, the aforementioned summary and shall post a certified copy ofthis Ordinance, together with the vote for and against the same, in the Office ofthe City Clerk. Introduced by Council Member and seconded by Council Member _____ on the __ day of , 2015. Passed on the __ day of "2015 by the following vote: AYES: Council Members NOES: ABSENT: APPROVED: Michael Villalta, Mayor ATTEST: Lucille L. Mallonee, City Clerk City ofLos Banos NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Small Residential Rooftop Solar Energy System Permit Process NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT a Public Hearing will be held to consider the adoption of an ordinance amending Title 8 Building Regulations of the City of Los Banos Municipal Code, to provide an expedited, streamlined solar permitting process that complies with the Solar Rights Act and AB 2188 A PUBLIC HEARING will be held at the regular meeting of the City Council on August 19, 2015, at 7:00 p.m., or soon thereafter as may be heard, in the Los Banos City Council Chambers located at 520 J Street. Questions regarding the above-referenced item may be directed to Tim Marrison, Fire Chief/Building Official at the Fire Department located at 333 7th Street or at (209) 827-7025. Persons wishing to provide oral comment on this matter may do so at this meeting or may provide written comments on this matters prior to the August 19, 2015, City Council meeting. Written comments may be sent by U.S. Mail or hand delivered to the City of Los Banos City Hall at 520 J Street, Los Banos, California 93635. If no comments are received prior to or on the above dates, it will be assumed that no comments are being offered. The public is also informed that should this matter at some future date go to court, court testimony is limited to only those issues raised at the hearings per Government Code Section 65009. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS TIM MARRISON DATED: August 3, 2015 Fire Chief/Building Official PUBLISHED: August 7, 2015 rosBanos Agenda Staff Rel!Q!! TO: Mayor and City Council M~ FROM: Tim Marrison, Fire Chief I ~ DATE: August 19, 2015 SUBJECT: Adoption of the Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan with local annex TYPE OF REPORT: Agenda Recommendation: That the City Council considers adoption of a resolution adopting the Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan with local annex. Background: In 2000, Congress passed the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, which focuses on hazard mitigation before, rather than after, disasters such as earthquakes, fires, and floods. Congress' goal was to encourage local governments and states to develop plans and undertake projects to mitigate the impact of natural disasters before they happen. The Act stresses the importance of mitigation planning and disaster preparedness prior to an event, an effort by the federal government to reduce the rising cost of natural disasters. The legislation therefore requires all local governments to develop and adopt a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan in order to be eligible for participation in and receive disaster mitigation funding from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP). The Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) is a planning document for hazards mitigation, focusing primarily on natural hazards. Its purpose is to identify natural hazards in the area and ways to mitigate the impacts of those hazards before they occur. The LHMP establishes a planning process for developing the document, incorporates applicable prior hazard studies, assesses the resources available for hazards mitigation planning, including existing ongoing hazards planning and mitigation for the area, identifies natural hazards affecting the area and assesses the risk to people and property from those hazards, and provides mitigation strategies for minimizing the impacts of identified hazards. The primary intent of the LHMP is to minimize impacts to people and property from identified natural hazards. It is not intended to provide response scenarios for emergency events. Discussion: The County of Merced and cities of Los Banos, Atwater, and Livingston, have united to develop a multi-jurisdiction local hazard mitigation plan (Plan). In June of 2012 the County of Merced was awarded FEMA Pre Disaster Hazard Mitigation Plan Grant. In May of 2013 Howell Consulting was awarded the contract to prepare the plan. Each of the participating jurisdictions have provided input consisting of Hazard Analysis, Hazard Mitigation actions, Hazard Identification, Vulnerability Assessment and Risk Assessment. Planning meetings with planning team members and the consulting staff team were conducted through the entire process starting in September of 2013. Former Fire Chief Guintini and Police Commander Ray Reyna represented the City of Los Banos. Public meetings were held on March 11, 2014 in the City of Los Banos and on March 12, 2014 in the City of Livingston. The Draft Plan was posted on the County website in June of 2014. A press release was issues informing the public of the Draft Plan and instructions on how to comment. The Plan was submitted to FEMA in August of 2014 for review and tentative approval. In May 2015, tentative approval of the Plan was given by FEMA pending formal adoption by all of the participating jurisdictions. Fiscal Impact: There are no negative fiscal impacts associated with this action. The Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan is a prerequisite to receiving certain disaster reimbursement funding. Failure to adopt the Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan may jeopardize disaster reimbursement in the event of an event of local consequence. Reviewed by: Steve Carrigan, City Manager Attachments: Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Resolution FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Proudly serving the Citizens of Los Banos with .1{onor - Intcgn'ty - Compassion Since 1890 ~ .....------.....------ TO: Los Banos City Council FROM: Tim Marrison, Fire Chief /f DATE: 8-10-2015 RE: Hazard Mitigation Plan These attachments are excerpts from the Merced County Multi·Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan that pertain to the City of Los Banos. The plan as a whole is quite extensive, so I chose to provide you with only the sections that pertain to the City of Los Banos. Ifyou wish to review the entire plan, I would be happy to provide it in a PDF format. 333 yth Street. Los Banos, CA 93635 Phone: (209) 827·7025 • Fax: (209) 827-7028 1 MEf!CEDb COUNTY Multi-jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan August 2014 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Howell Consulting would like to thank those Departments and Agencies who participated in the planning and development ofthis document. The official Merced County Local Hazard Mitigation Planning Team provided the oversight and dedication to this project that was required and without their commitment; this project would not be possible. The Planning Team members are as follows: Planning Team Members Karen Overstreet Merced County Agricultural Commissioner's Office Rick Blackwell Merced County Animal Control Rich Green Merced County ofAssociated Governments Glenn Cutler Merced County Building Services Roger Matzkind Merced County Counsel James Clark Merced County Emergency Medical Services Ron Duran Merced County Emergency Medical Services Chris Soehnen Merced County Environmental Health Steve Lowe Merced County Environmental Health Mike North Merced County Executive Office (PIO) Mike Rhodes Merced County Executive Office Carlos Isaac Cabrera Merced County Geographic Information Systems Michael Andrade Merced County Geographic Information Systems Paul E. Baxter Merced County Office ofEducation Jeremy Rahn Merced County Office ofEmergency Services Nancy Koerperich Merced County Office of Emergency Services Kim Nausin Merced County Purchasing Department S. Michael Johnson Merced County Public Health Department Meng Fang Merced County Public Health Department B. J. Jones Merced County Sheriffs Office Frank Pietro City ofAtwater Kathryn Reyes City of Gustine Doug Dunford City of Gustine Police Department James Hamera City ofGustine Police Department Paul Avila City ofLivingston Fire Department Ruben Chavez City ofLivingston Police Department Chet Guintini City ofLos Banos Fire Department Ray Reyna City of Los Banos Police Department Kevin Nagata California Office of Emergency Services Howell Consulting Team Brenna Howell Project Manager NealO'Haire Facilitator Kris Nelson Planner Jim Kniss Mapping Coordinator As with any working plan, representation ofplanning strategies and guidance are as understood as ofthe date of this plan's release. This plan identifies natural hazards and risks, and identifies the hazard mitigation strategy to reduce vulnerability as well as assist the communities of Merced County to be more disaster resistant and sustainable. August2014 Final Page 2 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan FORMAL PLAN ADOPTION DOCUMENTATION Merced County, the unincorporated county, and the cities ofAtwater, Livingston and Los Banos will submit this 2014 Merced County Multi-jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (MHMP) to the Merced County Board ofSupervisors and the City Councils upon successful completion ofstate and federal review and conditional approval. Merced County wishes to receive approval pending adoption. The plan will be submitted to the Board of Supervisors/City Councils as a regularly scheduled agenda item with room for additional public and departmental comment. Our approach to this final element is due to the need to remain cost effective in the planning process. By receiving state and federal approval ofthe plan prior to going to the Board of Supervisors/City Councils, we are able to go to the Board of Supervisors/City Councils on a single date to finalize promulgation ofthis document. The resolution will be inserted immediately after this page and before the table ofcontents. As part ofthe agenda report, the basic requirements for the plan, the scope ofthe document and the need to revise every five years will be clearly stated. (Resolutions from Merced County/participating jurisdictions adopting the plan inserted here) August 2014 Final Page 3 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements 2 Formal Plan Adoption Documentation 3 Introduction and County Overview 6 Introduction and Purpose of Plan 6 AB 2140 Compliance 6 Goals and Objectives 6 Scope 7 County Overview 8 Plan Organization and Structure 14 Element A: Planning Process 15 Element A.1. Planning Process 16 Element A.2. Coordination with other Communities 20 Element A.3. Public Involvement 22 Element A.4. Review and Incorporation of Existing Plans 23 Element A.S. Plan Maintenance Process 24 Element A.6. Continued Public Involvement 24 Element B: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment 27 Disaster Declaration History 28 Methodology 29 Element 8.1 Hazard Descriptions 31 Element B.2 Previous Occurrences and Probability of Future Occurrences 31 EARTHQUAKE.. 31 FLOOD 35 SEVERE WEATHER .43 WiLDFIRE 50 Element B.3. Vulnerability Assessment S7 Estimating Potential Losses 62 Element 8.4. Repetitive Loss and Severe Repetitive Loss Properties 70 Element C: Mitigation Strategy 71 Element C.1 Existing Authorities, Policies, Programs and Resources 71 Element C.2 Participation in the NFIP 71 Element C.3 Mitigation Goals 73 Element (.4 Mitigation Actions and Projects 74 Element C.S Mitigation Strategy Action Plan 76 Element C.6 Project Implementation 76 Element D: Plan Review, Evaluation and Implementation 78 Element D.1 Changes in Development 78 Element D.2 Progress in Local Mitigation Efforts 78 Element E: Plan Adoption 79 Element E.1 Formal Adoption Documentation 79 Element E.2 Merced County Operational Area Hazard Mitigation Plan 79 August 2014 Final Page 4 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan References 80 August2014 Final PageS Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan INTRODUCTION AND COUNTY OVERVIEW Introduction and Purpose ofPlan Each year, natural disasters in the United States take the lives ofhundreds ofpeople and injure thousands more. Nationwide, taxpayers pay billions ofdollars each year to help communities, organizations, businesses, and individuals recover from disasters. These losses only partially reflect the true cost ofdisasters, because additional expenses to insurance companies and nongovernmental organizations are not reimbursed by tax dollars. Additionally, many natural disasters are predictable. Many more are repetitive, often with the same results. Many ofthe damages caused bythese events can be alleviated or even eliminated. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has made reducing losses from natural disasters one ofits primary goals. Hazard mitigation planning and subsequent implementation of projects, measures, and policies developed through those plans, is the primary mechanism in achieving these goals. Mitigation planning has resulted in the implementation of projects that have successfully reduced disaster damages. Merced County's number one priority is protecting the people ofMerced County; including the cities ofAtwater, Dos Palos, Gustine, Livingston, Los Banos and Merced from the potential impacts ofearthquakes, flooding, wildfires and other disasters. This plan was developed in accordance with the Code ofFederal Regulations (CFR) and pursuant to the regulations ofthe Disaster Mitigation Act (DMA) of2000. The DMA revises the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act by adding Section 322, which provides new and revitalized emphasis on hazard mitigation, including a new requirement for local mitigation plans. These new local mitigation planning regulations are implemented through 44 CFR Part 201.6. The DMA requires state and local governments to develop multi-hazard mitigation plans to maintain their eligibility for certain federal disaster assistance and hazard mitigation funding programs. Communities at risk from natural disasters cannot afford to jeopardize this funding. More importantly, proactive mitigation planning at the local level can help reduce the cost of disaster response and recovery to property owners and government by protecting critical community facilities, reducing liability exposure, and minimizing overall community impacts and disruption. Merced County and its participating jurisdictions have been affected by disasters in the past and are committed to reducing disaster impacts and maintaining eligibility for federal mitigation grant funding. AB 2140 Compliance The Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan was prepared in coordination with the Health and Safety Element ofthe Merced County General Plan, as the planning effort covers common overlapping issues. The MHMP and Health and Safety Element are considered complimentary documents that address natural hazards and works toward enhancing mitigation efforts. Goals and Objectives The Planning Team voted to align with the goals and objectives listed in the Health and Safety Element ofthe Merced County General Plan to ensure consistency for the projects carried over from that plan into this planning effort. The goals and objectives are consistent with the overall direction ofthe County regarding mitigation efforts and based upon the risk assessment completed. Those goals and objectives are as follows: August2014 Final Page 6 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Goal 1: Minimize the possibility ofloss oflife, injury or damage to property from impacts of natural hazards to life, property, and the environment. • Promote education and awareness about natural hazards risk, mitigation, and preparedness to citizens, public agencies, elected officials, nonprofit organizations, and businesses. • Assist vulnerable populations from the impacts ofsevere weather by organizing a mechanism for outreach. • Encourage the use of drought tolerant or xeriscaping practices into landscape ordinances. • Ensure protection and enhancement of key emergency access routes. • Protect critical facilities and infrastructure to minimize loss of critical services. • Minimize growth and development in hazard areas. • Adopt and enforce building codes. • Incorporate flood mitigation into local planning by adoption of post disaster recovery ordinance based on a plan to regulate repair activity. • Continue to improve enforcement ofexisting standards and regulations. Goal 2: Minimize impacts ofnatural disasters to agriculture and the economies of communities. • Encourage water conservation measures among urban, rural, and agricultural users. • Increase water storage to mitigate flooding and drought. • Develop water saving education program. • Develop plans for post-disaster recovery. • Strengthen disaster resistance and resiliency of major employers. Goal 3: Implement identified mitigation activities • Promote hazard mitigation as integrated policy among communities in the county and with the region and state. • Increase communication regarding hazard mitigation among communities in the county. • Educate property owners by increasing wildfire awareness and measures for reducing risks. • Seek funding sources and partners for future mitigation activities. • Improve organizational capabilities to address health and safety issues in mitigation and response. To meet identified goals and objectives, the plan recommends 11 mitigation actions; those mitigation actions are located in Element C.4 and in each of the jurisdictional annexes. Scope Hazard mitigation is defined as sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to human life and property from hazards. Hazard mitigation planning is the process through which hazards that threaten communities are identified; likely impacts are determined, prioritized and implemented. This plan continues the natural hazard mitigation planning process for Merced County, the unincorporated county, and the participating cities ofAtwater, Livingston and Los Banos. The plan identifies natural hazards and risks within Merced County, and identifies the hazard mitigation strategy to reduce vulnerability and make the communities ofMerced County more disaster resistant and sustainable. Information in this plan can be used to help guide and coordinate mitigation activities and local land use decisions. August2014 Final Page? Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Merced County and participating jurisdictions initially developed this hazard mitigation plan to reduce future losses to the county and its communities resulting from natural hazards. The plan also was prepared to meet the evolving requirements ofthe Disaster Mitigation Act of2000. The plan seeks to maintain eligibility for the FEMA Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) and Hazard Mitigation Grant Programs (HMGP). The Merced County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (MHMP) continues to be a multi-jurisdictional plan that covers the following local governments who participated in the planning process: • Unincorporated Merced County • City ofAtwater • City ofLivingston • City of Los Banos The City of Merced has their own Single-jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan and elected not to participate in this planning process due to the recent development oftheir own plan, however the City ofMerced is a strong partnerwith the County and the other jurisdictions within the Operational Area. The planning process followed and continues the methodology prescribed by FEMA, which began with the formation ofa Local Hazard Mitigation Planning Team comprised ofkey stakeholders from Merced County, participating jurisdictions, and state and federal agencies. The Planning Team conducted a risk assessment to examine the recorded history oflosses resulting from natural hazards, assess probability and magnitude offuture hazard events, and analyze the county's assets at risk to hazards. The risk assessment indicated that severe weather (including drought), flooding (localized and dam failure), wildfire, and earthquake are the hazards most likely to significantly affect people and property in the county. Planning Team members are listed on the Acknowledgements page. County Overview History An expedition led by Gabriel Moraga in 1806 came upon a river he named EI Rio de Nuestra Senora de la Merced (River ofOur Lady of Mercy), or Merced River in which derived the name ofthe county. During a period between 1841 and 1844, while California was a province of independent Mexico, four Mexican land grants were made which eventually became Merced County. The county was created by the Act ofApril 19, 1855 and included parts ofMariposa County. Parts of the territory were also given to Fresno County in 1856. The early economy ofthe county centered on ranching and farming. Settlement in Merced County remained modest throughout much ofthe county's first century. Merced County is considered to be located in the world's most productive agricultural area, which, today, is a major source of employment, along with food processing, retailing, and light manufacturing. Merced County encompasses approximately 2,000 square miles. The County is larger in area (square miles) than 33 other California counties, ranking it 25 out ofa total of 58 counties in California. It is located in the heart ofthe San Joaquin Valley, north of Fresno and southeast ofSan Jose, and spans from the coastal ranges to the foothills ofYosemite National Park. The City of Merced is the County seat and offers a small community atmosphere, residential neighborhoods characterized by wide, tree-lined streets, and homes in a wide economic range. August2014 Final Page 8 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan The County of Merced is neighbored by the counties ofTuolumne County and Mariposa County to the northeast, Madera County to the south and east, Fresno County to the southeast, San Benito County to the southwest, Santa Clara County to the west, and Stanislaus County to the northwest. Merced County is the home to two National protected areas - Merced National Wildlife Refuge and San Luis National Wildlife Refuge. The former Castle Air Force Base and the United States Penitentiary-Atwater are located in an unincorporated area near Atwater. The Board of Supervisors is the governing body for Merced County. Elevation in Merced County, according to data gathered by the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) ranges from 6 feet above mean sea level ranking it 20 in terms of lowest elevations when compared to a total of58 counties in California, to 1,781 feet above mean sea level ranking it 54 in terms ofhighest elevation when compared to a total of58 counties in California. The rivers in this region include the Merced and Chowchilla, which are both tributaries ofthe San joaquin River. On average, there are 263 sunny days per year in Merced County. The number ofdays with any measurable precipitation is 49 with an average of approximately 12 inches ofrain per year. The month ofjuly is the warmest month with an average high around 96 degrees. The month ofjanuary is the coolest month with an average low of37 degrees. There are 6 incorporated cities in the county: Atwater, Dos Palos, Gustine, Livingston, Los Banos and Merced. There are 18 urban communities including Ballico, Bear Creek, Cressey, Delhi, Dos Palos Wye, El Nido, Franklin/Beachwood, Hilmar-Irwin, Le Grand, McSwain, Planada, Santa Nella, Snelling, South Dos Palos, Stevinson, Tuttle, Volta and Winton. Atwater' The City ofAtwater's history dates back to the late 1800s when Marshall D. Atwater was one ofthe largest land owners ofthe area. He had a huge contribution in developing the agricultural community ofthe area, and the place was named after him. Marshall Atwater was a wheat farmer whose land was used by the railroad for its station. The railroad reached Atwater in the 1870s, and then a town began to grow. The first post office opened in 1880. Two ofthe other influences on the area include Highway 99 and the Castle Air Force Base which was set up in 1941 as an aircrew training facility by the US Army. The City ofAtwater was incorporated in 1922. It is located in the northeastern portion ofMerced County between Hwy 99 and Castle Airport. Dos Palos· According to the United States Census Bureau, the City of Dos Palos covers an area of 1.35 square miles (3.5 km'), all ofit land with an elevation of 118 feet above sea level. Dos Palos is derived from a Spanish phrase meaning "two timbers". The Dos Palos post office operated from 1891 to 1906 however didn't officially open until 1906. The City of Dos Palos incorporated in 1935. On january 2008 6.52 square miles surrounding the community of Dos Palos were transferred from Fresno County to Merced County. The 2010 United States Census reported that Dos Palos had a population of4,950. Gustine· Gustine is located 29 miles west ofthe City ofMerced, at an elevation of98 feet above sea level. According to the United States 2010 Census, the population was 5,520, up from 4,698 at the 2000 census. Home ofthe nation's largest FESTA and steeped in Portuguese tradition, Gustine, is located in the heart ofthe Central Valley. The City is situated approximately 15 miles north of Santa Nella and about 6 miles east oflnterstate 5 on Highway 140. Gustine was established in the early 1900s as a station on the Southern Pacific Railroad and named after Sara Miller, nicknamed "Gussie", the daughter ofHenry Miller, the "Cattle King", an early California land baron and August2014 Final Page 9 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Agricultural pioneer. The first post office opened in 1907 and the City was incorporated in 1915. Gustine was the site ofthe first 9-1-1 system in California, installed in March 1970. Livingston - The City of Livingston in Merced County is situated approximately 14 miles northwest ofthe City of Merced, the county seat. Livingston is one ofthe smaller incorporated cities in the county and is located approximately 70 miles northwest ofFresno. Livingston is located in the center of California, about two hours from the cities ofSan Francisco, Oakland, Sacramento and Yosemite National Park. Monterey and San Jose are accessible in one and a half hours and within one hour ofSan Joaquin's Valley's major cities ofStockton and Fresno. The City is located in the western portion ofthe County with Highway 99 running through the city limits. According to the United States Census Bureau, Livingston is a total area of 3.47 square miles and has an elevation of 133 feet above sea level. The city was incorporated in 1922. Los Banos - According to Mexican land grant records, the Los Banos area was initially settled back in the 1840s. Uriah Wood, the first white settler in the area, built one ofthe first buildings - a two room cabin in 1859. The original site of Los Banos was located several miles from the current town center, about a mile and halfwest ofthe railroad near the present day community ofVolta. The original town of Los Banos was essentially a trading post and received its name when the Post Office was established. The Post Office Department designated the office "Los Banos" after the nearby creek. When the railroad arrived, Los Banos relocated to its present day location near the junction ofState Route 152 and Interstate 5. The first post office in the new location opened in 1873. In 2010, the population was 35,972 at the time ofthe census, up from 25,869 at the 2000 census. The city is served by the Los Banos Municipal Airport for air transport access. The centerpiece ofdowntown Los Banos is Miller Plaza, named in the honor ofthe early California rancher, Henry Miller. Merced· is the county seat ofMerced County, in the San Joaquin Valley. As of 2012, the City had a population of80,793.lncorporated on April 1, 1889, Merced is a charter city that operates under a council-manager government. It is named after the Merced River, which flows nearby. Merced, known as the "Gateway to Yosemite," is less than two hours by automobile from Yosemite National Park to the east and Monterey Bay, the Pacific Ocean, and several beaches to the west. The community is served by the rail passenger service Amtrak, a major airline through Merced Regional Airport, and three bus lines. It is apprOXimately 110 miles from Sacramento, 130 miles from San Francisco, 45 miles from Fresno, and 270 miles from Los Angeles. Unincorporated areas - Approximately 90,000 people live in the 18 communities located in the unincorporated areas of Merced County according to the Census of2010. Merced County and its communities are renowned for their unique natural resources, including pristine vernal pool grasslands, unique plant and animal species, large managed wetland preserves, and wildlife-based recreational opportunities. Much ofthe agricultural areas ofthe county lay in the unincorporated areas. Some unincorporated areas ofthe county are the most socially vulnerable in the county. As a general rule, the unincorporated communities tend to be more disadvantaged than their incorporated counterparts based on a number offactors, such as less diversification in employment opportunities, and a greater concentration ofagriculture related jobs. In 2005, the County became home to the tenth University ofCalifornia campus, University ofCalifornia, Merced (UCM), the first research university built in the U.S. in the 21st century. August 2014 Final Page 10 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan County ofMerced General Plan Area Map /' / Source: County ofMerced General Plan August 2014 Final Page 11 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan County ofMerced Supervisor Districts VICinity Map Merced County MADERA COL1NlY Legend Supervisors Districts , DISTRICT • 4 I 5 M'erced Count)! Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Pml Date: Dec. 2. 2013 Data Sauces; Merced County, Cal EMA County Planning Area Source: County ofMerced; Plauning Team August2014 Final Page 12 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Population The total estimated population of Merced County in 2010 was 255,793 up from 210,554 people in 2000. Population estimates for the unincorporated areas from the 2010 U.S. Census are included in the table below. Atwater 18,41 28,168 0 1,225 364 1416 76 5,300 1,377 14,808 Ballico 406 237 2 3 11 2 128 23 210 BearCreek 290 156 4 2 14 0 93 21 170 Cress 394 253 1 3 15 1 95 26 195 Delhi 10,755 5,655 118 157 405 30 3,930 460 7,706 Dos Palos 4,950 3,377 167 62 37 4 1,075 228 3,075 Dos Palos y 323 225 1 8 1 0 82 6 197 El Nido 330 162 0 7 9 0 147 5 245 Franklin 6,149 3,455 273 77 931 12 1,072 329 3,250 Gustine 5,520 3,875 73 54 95 8 1.191 224 2,769 Hilmar- Irwin 5,197 4,475 15 23 87 1 439 157 916 Le Grand 1,659 869 19 35 17 1 659 59 1,357 Livin ston 13,058 5,263 106 348 2,223 18 4,547 553 9,547 Los Banos 20,84 10,12 35,972 6 1,354 512 1,162 134 3 1,841 23,346 McSwain 4,171 3,196 56 34 282 9 422 172 1,081 Merced 41,17 17,80 78,958 7 4,958 1.153 9,342 174 4 4,350 39,140 Planada 4,584 1,681 22 23 46 1 2,725 86 4,347 Santa Nella 1,380 832 22 25 31 0 433 37 968 Snellin 231 206 3 6 13 3 33 South Dos ° ° Palos 1,620 809 135 21 36 10 552 57 1,262 Stevinson 313 228 4 0 0 0 73 8 133 Tuttle 103 77 6 0 6 9 5 31 University ° of Calif. - Merced 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volta 246° 201 °7 ° 1 4 29 3 132 Winton 10,613 5,696 175 140° 701 8 3,455 438 7,566 Source: 2010 U.S. Census Economy Merced County is located in the heart of California's rapidly growing San Joaquin Valley, the richest agricultural area in the world. With that distinction also come the challenges ofan economy, which has historically been dependent on seasonal agriculture and low wages. Government is the largest employer, followed by agriculture, trade, transportation & utilities, education & health care, and manufacturing. August2014 Final Page 13 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Merced County provides a broad range ofservices to its residents, businesses, and visitors, and manages and operates its facilities to meet community needs. Agriculture is the foundation of Merced County's economy, and the County consistently ranks as one ofCalifornia's top five producers ofmilk and cream, chickens, almonds, alfalfa, cattle and calves, silage, and tomatoes. Merced County is home to four agricultural processing facilities that are among the largest oftheir kind in the world: Ernest and Julio Gallo winery, Hilmar Cheese production facility, Ingomar Packing Company tomato processing plant, and Foster Farms poultry processing facility. The community is served by Amtrak rail passenger service, by four airports (Merced Regional Airport, Castle Airport, Gustine Airport and Los Banos Municipal Airport), by The Bus which provides local service in Merced as well as connecting service between most cities in Merced County, Cat Tracks which is operated by the University ofCalifornia, Merced, the Yosemite Area Regional Transportation System (YARTS) connecting Merced with Yosemite National Park, and Greyhound buses. Merced County is renowned for its unique natural resources, including pristine vernal pool grasslands, unique plant and animal species, large managed wetland preserves, and wildlife-based recreational opportunities. More detailed information on the general overview ofthe county and participating jurisdictions are located in the jurisdictional annexes attached to this plan. Plan Organization and Structure The Plan is divided into several primary sections, each covering a component ofthe document as required under state and federal planning guidance. The primary sections are further supported by front documents, sectional attachments, and appendices that support specific issues attached to the plan. • Introduction • Element A: Planning Process • Element B: Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment • Element C: Mitigation Strategy • Element D: Plan Review, Evaluation and Implementation • Element E: Plan Adoption • References • Planning Process Documentation • Community Profile Annexes o Unincorporated Merced County o City ofAtwater o City of Livingston o City of Los Banos August2014 Final Page 14 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan ELEMENT A: PLANNING PROCESS Requirement §201.6(b}: An open public involvement process is essential to the development ofon effective plan. More often than not, communities are faced with having to deal with the aftermath ofan unwanted hazard that can devastate areas ofa community. While we cannot prevent disasters from happening, their effects can be reduced or eliminated through hazard mitigation planning, but only if a local government has the foresight to assess likely hazards and craft preventative measures before the next hazard event occurs. This Chapter describes the background ofthe hazard mitigation planning process in Merced County. The Merced County Office ofEmergency Services (OES) recognized the need and importance of developing this plan and was responsible for its initiation and for securing funding through a FEMA Homeland Security Grant. The County contracted with Howell Consulting in mid-2013 to facilitate the development ofthe Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (MHMP). Howell Consulting's role was to assist Merced County in the following: • Form a local hazard mitigation Planning Team and include key stakeholders and representatives • Follow FEMAs planning guidance and follow the requirements set forth in the DMA 2000 • Facilitate the planning process and identify the data requirements • Facilitate the process for public involvement and input • Work closely with the California Office ofEmergency Services (Cal 0 ES) on the development and review ofthe revised plan and planning process • Ensure coordination with Cal OES and FEMA Region on review, approval and formal adoption ofthe plan by the Merced County Board ofSupervisorsjparticipating City Councils Merced County utilized many of FEMA's multi-hazard mitigation planning guidance documents including the Planning How-To Guides to structure the overall facilitation and development ofthe planning process. The follOWing sections describe the planning process. Multi-Jurisdictional Participation Each jurisdiction participating in this plan developed its own annex, which provides a more detailed assessment ofeach jurisdiction's unique risks, as well as their mitigation strategy to reduce long-term losses. Each jurisdictional annex continues to address the following items: • Community profile summarizing geography, history, economy, and population • Hazard information on geographically specific hazards • Hazard map(s) at an appropriate scale for the jurisdiction, ifavailable • Number and value ofbuildings, critical facilities, and other community assets located in hazard areas, if available • Vulnerability in terms offuture growth and development in identified hazard areas • Capability assessment describing existing regulatory, administrative, technical, and fiscal resources and tools, as well as outreach efforts and partnerships, and past mitigation projects • Mitigation actions specific to the jurisdiction August 2014 Final Page 15 Merced County OperationalArea Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Each jurisdiction was required to meet strict plan participation requirements defined at the beginning ofthe process, which included the following: • Designating a representative to serve on the Merced County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team • Participating in most, if not all ofthe Planning Team meetings • Providing data and information to complete the jurisdictional annex, including identifYing at least one mitigation action and completing the Information Collection Tool • Reviewing and commenting on plan drafts • Informing the public, local officials, and other interested parties about the planning process and providing opportunity for them to comment on the plan and annex within their own jurisdiction • Formally adopting the mitigation plan and the jurisdictional annex All ofthe jurisdictions with annexes to this plan met all ofthese participation requirements. In most cases, the representative for each jurisdiction brought together a Planning Team to help collect data, identifY mitigation actions and implementation strategies, and review annex drafts. Element A.L Planning Process Requirement §201.6(c)(l): [The plan shall document] the planning process used to develop the plan, including how it was prepared, who was involved in the process, and how the public was involved. The Merced County Operational Area is an active county where emergency management issues are discussed, presented and recommended for approval by the Merced County Board of Supervisors as well as the cities ofAtwater, Dos Palos, Gustine, Livingston, Los Banos and Merced City Councils. On behalf ofthe Operational Area, Merced County OES took the lead for this planning project. The Merced County OES staff distributed a formal invitation to key stakeholders, county, city, special districts, state and federal representatives to participate in the planning process by attending the official planning team/project kickoff meeting. Hazard Mitigation Planning Team Tasks Specific tasks were identified for the Planning Team in order to ensure that project goals for the plan will be undertaken and completed. The following represents those primary Planning Team tasks: • Coordinate tasks and activities with the Office ofEmergency Services to develop all hazards disaster mitigation plan and oversee the planning process. • Prioritize hazards vs. resources. • Select highest and best mitigation recommendations and develop those recommendations for further action by the Merced Operational Area (OA), together with their own agencies • Review planning drafts, recommendations and updates • Develop and implement long and short term goals • Integrate the plan with all phases of comprehensive emergency management planning • Provide for the implementation of Planning Team decisions August2014 Final Page 16 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan • Encourage, coordinate and provide a methodology for the implementation ofpublic input • Establish Hazard Mitigation Planning Team tasks to include but not be limited to the following: o Determine implementation ability and constraints for proposed hazard mitigation planning steps and development ofstrategies o Bring forward community concerns through private and public input o Identil'y implementation resources o Provide for the update ofComprehensive Emergency Management Plans on a scheduled basis o Evaluate and carry out mitigation activities o Assist in implementation of funding identification and procurement • Ensure that adjacent jurisdictions, pertinent private entities and citizens are informed of the hazard mitigation planning process and offer each the opportunity for input into the plan. A Planning Team was developed that included members from participating jurisdictions. The Planning Team representatives decided to work collectively on the plan and the jurisdictional annexes. Planning Team members were responsible for bringing specific information and data to and from the Planning Team from their respective jurisdictions and agencies seeking approval, such as Unincorporated Merced County, Atwater, Livingston, and Los Banos. Within each jurisdiction, staffmet with the Planning Team representative to develop their specific annex. These jurisdictional annexes were developed at their regularly scheduled meetings and with key departments being contacted directly from the Planning Team representative. In addition, this hazard mitigation planning process fit in well with the ongoing updating ofsome ofthe participating jurisdictions safety elements oftheir general plans. The jurisdictional planning process is described in the following: City ofAtwater • Police Chief/Emergency Manager - Official Planning Team Representative • City Manager • Community Development Director (Floodplain Manager) • Public Works (Building Official) • Human Resources • Finance • Fire Department (CaIFire) Battalion Chief • Parks and Community Services Department Director The City ofAtwater Planning Team met collectively at their regularly scheduled Department Head meetings which were held each week. This meeting included a roundtable discussion which is where the Hazard Mitigation Plan development was discussed by the Atwater Police Chief. Discussions included the overall project scope and planning process participation, hazard identification and analysis, vulnerability assessment, development trends, continued public involvement, mitigation goals and strategy development, mitigation projects and actions updates/revisions and new project development, and draft plan review and approval processes. City ofLivingston • Police Chief - Official Planning Team Representative AUBust2014 Final PaBe 17 Merced County OperationalArea Local Hazard Mitigation Plan • City Manager • Community Development Director (Floodplain Manager) • Public Works Director (Building Official) • Parks Director The City ofLivingston Planning Team met collectively at their regularly scheduled Department Head meetings held weekly. This meeting included a roundtable discussion where the Hazard Mitigation Plan development was discussed by the Police Chief. Discussions included the overall project scope and planning process participation, hazard identification and analysis, vulnerability assessment, development trends, continued public involvement, mitigation goals and strategy development, mitigation projects and actions updates/revisions and new project development, and draft plan review and approval processes. City ofLos Banos • Fire Chief/Emergency Manager - Official Planning Team Representative • City Manager • Community and Economic Development Director • Human Resources Director • Finance Director • Public Works Director • Police Chief The City of Los Banos Planning Team met collectively at their regularly scheduled Department Head meetings which were held each week. This meeting included a roundtable discussion, which is where the Hazard Mitigation Plan development was discussed by the Fire Chief. Discussions included the overall project scope and planning process participation, hazard identification and analysis, vulnerability assessment, development trends, continued public involvement, mitigation goals and strategy development, mitigation projects and actions updates/revisions and new project development, and draft plan review and approval processes. The Cities ofAtwater, Livingston, and Los Banos jurisdictional annexes were developed and discussed in coordination with the Official Planning Team meeting schedule as noted in the table on Page 19 either at their regularly scheduled Department Head meetings or immediately following those meetings. Also, the lead Planning Team member for each jurisdiction contacted key departments directly for additional information. In addition, this hazard mitigation planning process fit in well with the ongoing updating ofthe some ofthe participating jurisdictions safety elements oftheir general plans. Planning Meetings and Process The planning process officially began with a project introduction meeting in Atwater, California, on September 19, 2013. The overall schedule for the project was discussed, highlighting major project milestones and ending with the anticipated final draft plan submitted to FEMA for approval in August 2014. The Howell Consulting Team gave a presentation to all attendees on Hazard Mitigation planning and the planning process. Members ofthe public were also solicited to serve on the Planning Team and since many ofthe governmental representatives on the Planning Team also resided within Merced County, those members served a dual role. At the second meeting ofthe Planning Team also in Atwater held on December 4, 2013, the focus ofthis meeting was the Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment process. The risk assessment August2014 Final Page 18 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan process identifies and profiles relevant hazards and assesses the exposure to lives, property and infrastructure to these hazards. The goal ofthe risk assessment is to estimate the potential losses in Merced County along with the participating jurisdictions from a hazard event. Planning Team members at this meeting evaluated the hazards and profiled which hazards occurred over the 5 year planning cycle. Element Bcovers this topic in detail. The third Planning Team meeting was held on March 10, 2014. The planning team meeting participants were lead through a series of discussions on current capabilities and mitigation actions and strategies. The consultants provided an overview of the Mitigation Strategies. The Planning Team developed new strategies to meet the goals and objectives and prioritized those strategies for the operational area. The Planning Team members took the newly developed strategies back to their jurisdictions to gain input and feedback. Completed mitigation projects and strategies were submitted back to the planning team to gain consensus and prioritization. Public meetings were held on March 11, 2014 in the City of Los Banos and March 12, 2014 in the City of Livingston. The intent ofthese meetings was to gain participation ofthe people living in the communities to help assess the likelihood of natural hazards and to identifY measures to minimize impacts. These meetings were geographically scheduled to make attendance convenient for the citizens in Merced County. In june, 2014, the draft plan was reviewed by the Merced County Emergency Services Coordinator, the Planning Team and several other key county and city staff, such as the Planning Department key personnel. In addition, each participating jurisdiction participated in a detailed review ofthe draft plan. Additionally, due to scheduling, Howell Consulting held a teleconference with participating Planning Team members. The purpose of this meeting was to briefon the final draft plan and release it for comments to include the public. The plan was placed on the county website for public review and comment, and also placed on the project website at www.mercedhazmit.comin june 2014 and will remain on that website until FEMA conditional approval is received, placed at strategic locations around the county including the Fire Department Administration and at each of the participating jurisdictional County Administration/City Manager's Offices as part ofthe planning process. The County Public Information Officer on behalf ofall ofthe participating jurisdictions executed a press release informing the public ofthe plan draft and instructions on how to comment. The folloWing table shows a summary of the planning process meetings, their topics, dates, and locations. summaryorPIanRJDll Process Meeting Title. .- Number Kick-off/Planning Team 1 09/19/13 Atwater roles and expectations Hazard identification 2 Atwater / Analysis, general update 12/4/13 jurisdictional Site Visits, 3 Mitigation Strategy, 03/10/2014 Atwater general update 4 Public Meeting- 03/1112014 Los Banos August2014 Final Page 19 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting I Number community participation meeting Public Meeting - 5 community participation 03/12/2014 Livingston meeting 6 Final Draft Briefing 06/2014 Various Source: Project Documentation The official Planning Team is as follows: County ofMerced Planning Team Jeremy Rahn (Lead A enc Frank Pietro ames Hamera Rick Blackwell Kim Nausin Men Fan Karen Overstreet Ra Re na Rich Green Glenn Cutler Ro er Matzkind Paul Avila Paul E. Baxter Merced Coun Kevin Na ata State ofCalifornia Carlos I Cabrera MercedCoun Ruben Chavez Ci ofLivin ston Brenna Howell Howell Consultin Neal T. O'Haire Howell Consultin Jim Kniss Howell Consultin Additionally, the Planning Team communicated frequently during the planning process with a combination of in-person meetings, conference calls, email correspondence and communication through an online documents/data-sharing site. The meeting topics along with sign-in sheets and agendas are located in the Planning Process Documentation section ofthis plan. Element A.2. Coordination with other Communities Requirement §201.6(b)(2): An opportunity for neighboring communities, local and regional agencies involved in hazard mitigation activities, and agencies that have the authority to regulate development, as well as businesses, academia and other private and non-profit interests to be involved in the planning process. August 2014 Final Page 20 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Since the inception ofthis planning process a major forum for sharing this planning with adjacent jurisdictions is the Mutual Aid Regional Advisory Committee (MARAC) for California Mutual Aid Region V. Region V's members are contiguous counties to Merced County. The value to this collaboration is thatthese counties share many ofthe same characteristics as Merced County such as similar threats, politics, geography and culture. This coordinated process has been made possible by the support ofmany federal grant programs. Since many ofthe counties in Region V have already gone through the hazard mitigation planning process, their experience and advice has proven invaluable to Merced County. Each ofthese meetings includes a local roundtable discussion where Merced County has been able to freely and collaboratively share their local hazard mitigation planning process. In addition, the Planning Team developed a list of neighboring communities, local and regional agencies involved in hazard mitigation activities, as well as other interests, to invite by letter to participate, review and comment on the draft ofthe Merced County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Acopy ofthis letter is provided in the Planning Process Documentation section ofthis plan, entitled "Interested Parties". The comments resulting from this effort were incorporated into the plan, as appropriate. The stakeholders invited to comment on the plan were the following: County Departments, Local andRegional Agencies • Merced County Agricultural Commissioner • Merced County Board ofSupervisors • Merced County Commission on Aging • Merced County Community Action Organization • Merced River Conservation District • Merced County Environmental Health Department • Merced County Farm Bureau • Merced County Fire Department • Merced County Human Services Agency • Merced Irrigation District • Merced County Local Agency Formation Commission • Merced County Office ofEducation • Merced County Office ofEmergency Services (OES) • Merced County Planning Department • Merced County Public Health Department • Merced County Public Works • Merced County Sheriffs Office • Merced County Water District • Merced Transit Authority • City ofAtwater • City ofDos Palos • City ofGustine • City ofLivingston • City of Los Banos • City of Merced • County ofFresno • County ofKings • County ofMadera August2014 Final Page 21 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan • County ofMariposa • County ofStanislaus • County ofTulare State and FederalAgencies • American Red Cross • California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection • California Office ofEmergency Services (Fresno Office) • California Department ofTransportation • National Weather Service • University ofMerced • US Army Corp of Engineers • U.S. Bureau ofReclamation (Fresno office) Businesses, Academia, and Private and Non-Profits • Merced County Fair • Merced County Historical Society • Merced County Times • Merced Sun Star • United Way ofMerced As part ofthe coordination with other agencies, the Planning Team collected and reviewed existing technical data, reports and plans. Merced County and the cities located there use a variety ofcomprehensive planning mechanisms, such as land use and general plans, emergency operations plans, and municipal ordinances and building codes, to manage community growth and development. This information was used in the development ofthe hazard identification, vulnerability assessment, and capability assessment and in the formation of goals, objectives, and mitigation actions. These sources are documented throughout the plan and specifically in the capability assessment sections ofeach jurisdictional annex. Element A.3. Public Involvement Requirement §201.6(bJ(l}: An opportunityfor the public to comment on the plan during the drafting stoge and prior to plan approval; Requirement §201.6(cJ(l} [The plan shall document] the planning process used to develop the plan, including howit was prepared, who was involved in the process, and how the public was involved. Atthe beginning ofthe planning project it was decided by Merced County OES that early public outreach in all stages ofthe plan development would be a high priority. Copies ofthose advertisements are located in the Planning Process Documentation section ofthis plan. In addition to the solicitation for Planning Team support, there was a Public Survey that was developed and distributed through various means such as posted on the Merced County website, posted on local message boards and handed out to various members ofthe public at events within Merced County and the participating jurisdictions. The survey provided an opportunity for the public to share their opinion and participate in the mitigation planning process. There were a total of37 responses to the survey from April 2013 to March 2014. There were several opportunities for survey respondents to provide additional comments. In all there were a total of 25 additional comments from the public. The information aided in helping the Planning Team better understand the hazard concerns and identified area policies and projects that could Augustl014 Final Pagell Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan potentially help lessen the impact offuture hazard events in Merced County. The survey along with the survey results, are located in the Planning Process Documentation section ofthis plan. There were also two separate public workshops held by the consulting team in coordination with the county/cities. These workshops were held in the evenings, during the week at selected, accessible locations within Merced County, so that the public could easily attend. The overall purpose ofthese meetings were to inform the public on the purpose and planning process for the local hazard mitigation plan development, present the types ofhazards in or possibly affecting Merced County, and seek input from the public on priorities for risk reduction. Merced County advertised the solicitation for participation in the planning process in the Merced Sun-Star (local newspaper) and website (www.mercedsunstar.com).andallofthemeetingsby flyers placed in each unincorporated area ofthe county at fire stations, libraries, and/or posted in grocery stores and other places frequented by local residents and the county website (www.mercedhazmit.com). which most ofthe City websites link. Meeting dates are provided below. • Tuesday March 11, 2014 - City ofLos Banos and Merced County • Wednesday March 12, 2014 - City ofLivingston and Merced County Once the first draft ofthe multi-jurisdictional plan and annexes had been developed, Merced County made it available on their website at www.co.merced.ca.us. A hard copy was also available at the following locations: Merced County Fire Administration (Gustine), the local libraries, and the City Manager's Offices for the participating cities. The jurisdictions announced the availability of the draft plan and the public comment. Acopy ofthe notice is provided in Planning Process Documentation section ofthis plan. A record ofthe public input, surveys and remaining planning process documentation are on file with Merced County DES. There were no public comments from the workshops or the final review from the public. The overall process included the discussion ofthe hazard mitigation planning process into various public meetings such as Board ofSupervisors meetings, Emergency Management meetings, Local and Regional Public Health meetings, Fire Chiefs meetings, School Board meetings and participating jurisdictional meetings and forums. The agendas, presentations and attendance rosters for each ofthese public meetings are located in the Planning Process Documentation section attached to this plan. Element A.4. Review and Incorporation ofExisting Plans Requirement §201.6(bj(3): Review and incorporation, ifappropriate, ofexisting plans, studies, reports, and technical information. August2014 Final Page 23 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Based on the capability assessment described throughout this plan, communities in Merced County continue to plan and implement programs to reduce losses to life and property from natural hazards. This plan builds upon the momentum developed through previous and related planning and mitigation efforts and recommends implementing projects through the following plans, where possible: • General Plans and zoning codes ofparticipating jurisdictions • Merced County Emergency Operations Plan • Participating Jurisdictional Emergency Operations Plans • Capital Improvements Plans • Other community plans, such as water master plans, storm water management plans, and parks and recreation plans • The Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Pre-Fire Management Plan and any Local Fire Safe Plans and Community Wildfire Protection Plans that may be developed in the future • Other plans and policies outlined in the capability assessment section ofthis plan The mitigation plan will be a primary source used to update the Health and Safety Element ofthe General Plan. The Health and Safety Element is updated on a five-year cycle consistent with the mitigation plan to improve efficient use of county resources and to improve consistency within county plans and policies. Element A.S. Plan Maintenance Process Requirement §201.6(cJ(4)(iii): [The plan maintenance process shall include aJ discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. Merced County and participating jurisdictions are dedicated to involving the public directly in review and update ofthe Merced County Multi-jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Copies ofthe plan will be catalogued and kept at all appropriate agencies in the countyI cities as well as at the main library and posted on official websites. Public meetings will be held as part ofeach annual review and the required five-year update ofthe plan. The meetings will provide a forum for public input to the plan. In addition to public meetings, the Office ofEmergency Services will provide an update to the Board of SuperVisors and City Councils on the process of mitigation planning in Merced County and the participating jurisdictions. This will allow the public to comment and capture any relevant comments into the public record. Element A.6. Continued Public Involvement Requirement §201.6(cJ(4J(i): [The plan maintenance process shall include aJ section describing the method and schedule ofmonitoring, evaluating, and updating the mitigotion plan within a five year cycle. The Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Planning Team has made the commitment to annually bring this plan before the public through public meetings and community postings so that citizens may make input as strategies and implementation actions change. Each jurisdiction is responsible for assuring that their citizenry are informed when August2014 Final Page 24 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan deemed appropriate by the standing Planning Team. Continued public involvement is imperative to the overall success ofthe plan's implementation. The update process provides an opportunity to solicit participation from new and existing stakeholders and to publicize success stories from the plan implementation and seek additional public comment. The plan maintenance and update process will include continued public and stakeholder involvement and input through attendance at designated committee meetings, web postings, press releases to local media, and through public hearings. When the Planning Team gathers to attend the March Operational Area meeting annually, for the plan update, they will coordinate with all stakeholders participating in the planning process, including those that joined the committee since the planning process began-to update and revise the plan. In reconvening, the Planning Team will identitY a public outreach strategy, which will layout the activities necessary to involve the greater public. The Planning Team will develop a plan for public involvement and will be responsible for disseminating information through a variety ofmedia channels detailing the plan update process. As part ofthis effort public comments will be solicited on the plan update draft. The Merced County Office of Emergency Services Coordinator, Jeremy Rahn will be responsible for the monitoring, evaluating, and updating ofthe MHMP for the entire Operational Area, including the participating jurisdictions ofAtwater, Livingston and Los Banos. The designated positions in the participating jurisdictions that will also take the lead in ensuring the plan is continually monitored, evaluated and updated are documented below. Emergency Office of Services Emergency X X X Coordinator Services Frank Pietro City City City of Manager Manager's Atwater X X X Office Tim Marrison Deputy Fire Fire City of Los X X Chief De artroent Banos X Ruben Chavez Police Chief Police City of X X X De artment Livin ston Source: Planning Team August2014 Final Page 25 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan August2014 Final Page 26 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan ELEMENT B: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT Requirement §201.6(c}(2}(i}: [The risk assessment shall include a} descriptian ofthe type, location and extent ofall natural hazards that can affect the jurisdiction. The plan shall include information on previous occurrences ofhazard events and on the probability offuture hazard events. §201.6(c}(2}(ii}: [The risk assessment shall include aJ description ofthejurisdiction's vulnerability to the hazards described in paragraph (c}(2}(i) ofthis section. This description shall include an overall summary afeach hazard and its impact on the community. All plans appraved after October 1, 2008 must also address NFIP insured structures that have been repetitively damaged byfloods. The plan should describe vulnerability in terms af: §201.6(c}(2}(ii}(A}: The types and numbers afexisting andfuture buildings, infrastructure, and critical facilities located in the identified hazard areas; §201.6(c}(2}(ii}(B}: An estimate ofthe potential dollar losses to vulnerable structures identified in ... this section and a description ofthe methodologyused to prepare the estimate. §201.6(c}(2}(ii}(C}: Praviding a general description ofland uses and development trends within the community so that mitigation options can be considered in future land use decisions. Risk to natural hazards is a combination ofhazard, vulnerability and capability. This section of the MHMP will look at both hazards and vulnerability. The risk assessment process identifies and profiles relevant hazards and assesses the exposure to lives, property and infrastructure to these hazards. The goal of the risk assessment is to estimate the potential losses in Merced County from a hazard event. This process also allows communities in Merced County to better understand their potential risk to natural hazards and provides a framework for developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to reduce the risks from future hazard events in Merced County. In the early meetings with Merced County and the Planning Team, data was reviewed from the folloWing sources on hazards affecting the county, those sources were: the Federal and State Disaster Declaration History, the State ofCalifornia Hazard Mitigation Plan (2010), the Health Safety Element ofthe Merced County 2035 General Plan (2010), and interviews ofstaffthat live and work in Merced County. The Planning Team, during their December 2013 meeting, came to agreement on significant hazards to Merced County. The Planning Team agreed not to address technological or human caused hazards, which are addressed in emergency operations plans for the county/cities. The hazards contained in this planning effort are in alphabetical order and listed below. • Earthquake • Floods (including Dam Failure) • Severe Weather (including Drought, Extreme Heat and Freeze) • Wildfire Non-Profiled Hazards The Planning Team reviewed data and discussed several other hazards, which were eliminated from further discussion because they occur rarely and/or their impacts are not significant. The list below details these hazards and provides a brief explanation for their omission from further profiling. • Avalanche - Snowfall is extremely rare to nonexistent across the planning area. • Coastal Erosion/Storm - Hazard does not occur due to distance from coasts and ocean. August 2014 Final Page 27 Merced Count:Y OperationalArea Local Hazard Mitigation Plan • Hailstorm - Severe thunderstorms during which hail normally occurs are rare. • Hurricane - Hazard does not occur due to distance from ocean. • Land Subsidence - Land subsidence does occur in many areas but primarily affects water wells, which local agencies address. • Landslides - Hazard may exist however rarely occur. • Tsunami - Hazard does not occur due to distance from ocean. • Windstorm - High winds occur but are not common. • Volcano - The U.S. Geological Survey does not include Merced County in their map of areas identified as subject to hazards from potential eruptions in California. The remainder ofthis section begins with an overview ofthe history of declared disasters in Merced County followed by the profiles ofidentified hazards. Disaster Declaration History One method to identify hazards is to look at the events that have triggered federal and/or state disaster declaration that included Merced County. The following table lists the declarations where Merced County was included in federal and/or state disaster declarations from 1950 to the present. Merced County_stor 1950-nresent m;mi:i:WW;:H!;~~C;;;;;i;iWWWii!;!;;;ZiX; SiX uill WZyy. 0~·L,~Wi:iZ'1i2YY; icY; :2 .,··>:>YJiZUi::; Flood 1950 Floods (Statewide) OCD50-01 ../ Flood 1955 Floods (Statewide) DR-47 ../ ../ Flood 1969 Storms, Flooding DR-253 ../ ../ Freeze 1972 Freeze ../ Flood Winter Storms 1982 DR-677 ../ ../ Freeze 1990 Freeze DR-894 ../ ../ Flood 1995 Late Winter DR-I046 ../ ../ Storms Flood 1997 January Floods DR-1155 ../ ../ Flood 1998 El Nino Floods DR-1203 ../ ../ Freeze 1998 Freeze DR-1267 ../ ../ Flood 2006 June Storms DR-1646 ../ ../ Drought Central Valley Drought GP 2008-03 ../ 2014 Source: Merced DES, Cal DES and FEMA The majority ofthe declarations were declared for flooding due to severe storms. These events occurred in 1950, 1955, 1969, 1982, 1995, 1997, 1998, and again in 2006. Afederal disaster declaration for freeze was declared in 1990 and 1998. There are several methods for government response to emergency situations. A state governor or local mayor may declare a state ofemergency within his or her jurisdiction. This is common at the state level in response to natural disasters when emergency conditions are beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities ofany single county, city, or city and county, and when emergency conditions require the combined forces ofa mutual aid region or regions to AugustZ014 Final PageZ8 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan combat. The following table lists the emergency declarations that impacted Merced County was also from 1950 to the present. Merced County Emergency Declaration History 1950-present I Type 'Name Hurricane Katrina California Hurricane 3248 Evacuation Katrina Evacuees Seotember 2005 Drought California Drought 3023 January 1976-77 Source: Merced DES, Cal DES and FEMA The federal government may also issue a disaster declaration through the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and/orthe Small Business Administration, as well as through FEMA. The quantity and types of damage are the determining factors. A USDA declaration makes all qualified farm operators in the designated areas eligible for low-interest emergency loans from the USDA's Farm Service Agency. As part ofan agreement with the USDA, the Small Business Administration offers low interest loans for eligible businesses that suffered economic losses in declared and contiguous counties. The USDA declarations impacting Merced County are located in the following table. USDAAllmCU. IturaIDIec arations S'mce 2009 12;12h 2·21; 1;I&2&&iNJNiiM;iNJ2Nq~!t*] ';,,,<2;;, WN1J!N;WN 1;;!;;;,h;;;;;diNh!; hi.;-;\-,.7;;h;i@*&JIK1~;@&IIN Drought; 27 counties in California including 01/15/2014 and continuing Merced County Drought; 5 counties in California including 07/3/2013 and continuing Merced County Drought; Madera County - primary; 5 04/24/2013 counties in California including Merced County Drought; 6 counties in California including 12/19/2012 and continuing Merced County Drought; 7 counties in California including 09/15/12 and continuing Merced County Hail, Rain, Cold Temperatures; 2 Primary 04/11-12/2012 counties (Kings & Merced) Heavy snow and freeze in Tuolumne County; 03/26/2011 7 surrounding counties designated natural disaster areas March 16, 2011 due to heavy snow and freeze Drought; 21 counties in California including 1/1/2009 and continuing Merced County Source: Agricultural CommISSIOner; Plannmg Team; USDA Methodology The hazards identified in Merced County by the Planning Team are profiled in this section. Hazard profiles provide information on the hazard description, extent and magnitude, previous August 2014 Final Page 29 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan occurrences, and probability offuture occurrence. The sources used to collect this information for Merced County included the following: • Disaster declaration history from the California Office ofEmergency Services (Cal OES) and FEMA. • California State Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan (2013). • Merced County Emergency Operations Plan (2013) and the Health and Safety Element of the Merced County General Plan (2013). • Geographic information systems (GIS) data from Cal OES and other state agencies, the U.S. Geological Survey, and the Merced County Planning Department. Information collection from the Planning Team meetings and completed by each participating jurisdiction profiling hazards in their area. A detailed profile for each ofthe identified hazards compiles information on the following characteristics ofthe hazard: Geographic Extent and Potential Magnitude This section describes the potential severity ofdisaster and any secondary events caused by the hazard and the extent or location ofthe hazard in the planning area. Magnitude is classified by the following: Catastrophic: More than 50 percent ofthe operational area affected Critical: Between 20-50 percent ofthe operational area affected Limited: 5-20 percent ofthe operational area affected Negligible: Less than 5 percent ofthe operational area affected No Damage: No secondary impacts Previous Occurrences This section includes information on historic incidents, including impacts, if known. An Information Collection Tool was used to capture information from participating jurisdictions on past occurrences. Information from the Planning Team was combined with other data sources such as the National Weather Service. Probability ofFuture Occurrences The frequency ofpast events is used to gauge the likelihood offuture occurrences. Based on historical data, the probability of future occurrences is categorized into one ofthe following classifications: Highly Likely: Occurs more than once per year Likely: Occurs between once a year and once every 7 years Occasional: Occurs between once every 8 years and once every 50 years Unlikely: Occurs once than once every 50 years Not Feasible: Does not occur due to geographic location characteristics The probability, or chance ofoccurrence, was calculated where possible based on existing data. Probability was determined by dividing the number of events observed by the number ofyears and multiplying by 100. This gives the percent chance ofthe event happening in any given year. An example would be three droughts occurring over a 30-year period, which suggests a 10 percent chance ofthat hazard occurring in any given year. August2014 Final Page 30 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Element B.1 Hazard Descriptions Element B.2 Previous Occurrences and Probability ofFuture Occurrences Requirement §201.6(c}(2}(i}: [The risk assessment shall include aJ description ofthe type, location and extent ofall natural hazards that can affect the jurisdiction. The plan shall include information on previous occurrences ofhazard events and on the probability offuture hazard events. The profiles for each ofthe identified hazards are listed below. Dam failure is addressed in the flood section due to its similar impacts. EARTHQUAKE Hazard Description An earthquake is caused by a sudden slip on a fault. Stresses in the earth's outer layer push the sides ofthe fault together. Stress builds up and the rocks slip suddenly, releasing energy in waves that travel through the earth's crust and cause the shaking that is felt during an earthquake. The amount ofenergy released during an earthquake is usually expressed as a magnitude and is measured directly from the earthquake as recorded on seismographs. The magnitude of earthquakes is usually measured using the Richter scale; a logarithmic scale calculated from the amplitude ofthe largest seismic wave recorded for the earthquake. Another measure ofearthquake severity is intensity. Intensity is an expression ofthe amount of shaking at any given location on the ground surface. Seismic shaking is typically the greatest cause ofdamage to structures during earthquakes. Seismologists have developed the Mercalli scale to quantify the shaking intensity of an earthquake's effects, which is measured by how an earthquake is felt by humans and the damage to buildings. Earthquakes can cause structural damage, injury, and loss oflife, as well as damage to infrastructure networks such as water, power, gas, communication, and transportation lines. Other damage-causing effects ofearthquakes are surface rupture, fissuring, settlement, and permanent horizontal and vertical shifting ofthe ground. Secondary impacts can include landslides, seiches, liquefaction, and dam failure. In populated areas, the greatest potential for loss oflife and property damage can come as a result ofground shaking from a nearby earthquake. The degree ofdamage depends on many interrelated factors. Among these are the Richter magnitude, focal depth, distance from the causative fault, duration ofshaking, type ofsurface deposits or bedrock, presence ofhigh ground water, topography, and finally, the design, type, and quality ofbuilding construction. Geographic Extent and Potential Magnitude The nearest faults ofmajor significance are the San Andreas to the west of Merced County, a distance ofapproximately 15 miles from the county line; the Hayward and Calaveras faults to the northwest; the White Wolf, Garlock, and Sierra Nevada faults to the south; and the Bear Mountain Fault Zone about 5 miles east ofand parallel to the eastern border ofMerced County. These faults have been and will continue to be the principal source ofseismic activity affecting the County of Merced. August2014 Final Page 31 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan There is no record ofany seismic activity originating in the county; however the county has been shaken by earthquakes originating elsewhere. There is documented evidence ofsix earthquakes that shook the area, those of1872, 1906, 1952, 1966, 1984, and 1989. Major damage occurred in Los Banos in 1906, with minor damage recorded throughout the county from other occurrences. The San Andreas occurs where the North American and Pacific plates come together and grind in a side-by-side motion relative to each other. Another large known fault, the White Wolffault, is located to the south near Arvin and Bakersfield and produced a severe M7.7 earthquake in 1952. The map below shows the known faults, historic epicenters, and potential for ground shaking resulting from earthquakes in and near Merced County. August2014 Final Page 32 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Vicinity Map Merced County Significant Earthquakes , ->-- Fault Lines ./ r~HOWELL Merced County ~~}jCONSULTING Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Print Dale: Dec. 2. 2013 Dota Souces: Merced County, Cal EMA, USGS Earthquakes - Historical Source: Planning Team AUfJust 2014 Final Page 33 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Earthquakes can occur at any time ofthe day or night and any time ofthe year. Earthquakes are particularly dangerous due to their rapid onset, generally without warning. Aftershocks can occur for days, weeks, and even months following a major earthquake. This additional damage to structures already weakened by the main earthquake increases the danger to rescue and recovery personnel. Earthquakes can result in many secondary effects, including fires and landslides, which are covered in separate sections ofthis plan. Ground settlement and soil compaction also may occur as a result ofseismic ground shaking. When unconsolidated valley sediments are saturated with water, water from voids is forced to the ground surface, where it emerges in the form of mud spouts or sand boils. If soil liquefies in this manner (liquefaction), it loses its supporting capacity, which can result in the minor displacement to total collapse ofstructures. These types of unconsolidated sediments represent the poorest kind ofsoil condition for resisting seismic shock waves. Previous Occurrences There have not been any damaging earthquakes greater than M6.0 recorded in Merced County in over 200 years, though several have been very close. The most recent large earthquake near Merced County was 16 miles east north-east of King City at a magnitude of5.3 on October 20, 2012. Several aftershocks followed the main earthquake, including a 3.1 aftershock. This quake was preceded by two earthquakes located approximately 100 miles from Merced County, the 1982 New Idria earthquake (M 5.4) and the 1983 Coalinga (M 6.5). There was a low level of ground shaking and low local magnitude reported. Major earthquakes have occurred near Merced County and resulted in ground shaking felt in the county. The Fort Tejon earthquake in 1857 ofM 7.9 was one ofthe greatest earthquakes ever recorded in the United States and the largest in California. It left an amazing surface rupture scar over 215 miles in length along the San Andreas Fault. The epicenter is now thought to have been located near Cholame, approximately 134 miles southwest ofthe City ofMerced. During the Fort Tejon earthquake, strong shaking lasted from one to three minutes. As a result ofthe shaking, the current ofthe Kern River was turned upstream, and water ran four feet deep over its banks. The waters ofTulare Lake were thrown upon its shores, stranding fish miles from the original lakebed. Property loss was heavy at Fort Tejon, one ofthe only settlements atthe time, an Army post in south-central Kern County about four miles from the San Andreas fault. In 1857, two buildings were declared unsafe, three others were damaged extensively but were habitable, and still others sustained moderate damage. One person was killed in the collapse ofan adobe house at Gorman. Probability ofFuture Occurrences Unfortunately, the number and variations ofall potential earthquakes are so large that it is not possible to develop scenarios for all ofthem, nor would it be possible to rank them by importance if such scenarios were developed. To get an idea ofthe overall scope ofthe risk oflosses from earthquakes and to determine which areas are most vulnerable, CGS uses an alternate approach based on probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA), which considers all possible earthquakes on all ofthe possible sources. Using this approach, CGS estimates an expected direct annual loss in California ofabout $2.2 billion. This is approximately 0.14 percent ofthe $1.6-trillion total value of the building inventory in the HAWS database. (HAWS is FEMA's hazard mapping and damage estimation software and database system.) Indirect losses, such as unemployment, business interruption, loss ofmarket share to other regions or countries, and other economic effects, could be as much as twice the direct losses (California SHMP 2013). August 2014 Final Page 34 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Along the San Andreas Fault, segments exist where no large earthquakes have occurred for long intervals oftime. These areas accumulate potential energy and provide clues as to where the next earthquake may occur and when. Scientists term these segments "seismic gaps" and, in general, have been successful in forecasting the time when some ofthe seismic gaps will produce large earthquakes. Geologic studies show that over the past 1,400 to 1,500 years, large earthquakes have occurred at about 150-year intervals on the southern San Andreas Fault. As the last large earthquake on the southern San Andreas was the Fort Tejon earthquake in 1857, that section of the fault is considered a likely location for an earthquake within the next few decades (USGS 1997). Based on the earthquake shaking potential mapped for Merced County, the proximity to the San Andreas Fault with a history ofshaking, but no surface rupture, the probability of damaging seismic ground shaking in Merced County is occasional. FLOOD Hazard Description The primary types offlood events in Merced County are riverine and urban. Flooding could also occur as a result ofdam failure. Regardless ofthe type offlood, the cause is often the result of severe weather and excessive rainfall, either in the flood area, upstream, or from winter snowmelt. Riverine flooding is the most common type offlood event and occurs when a watercourse exceeds its "bank-full" capacity. Riverine flooding generally occurs as a result ofprolonged rainfall, or rainfall that is combined with already saturated soils from previous rain events. The duration of riverine floods may vary from a few hours (flash flood) to many days (slow-rise flooding). Factors that directly affect the amount offlood runoffinclude precipitation amount, intensity and distribution, the amount ofsoil moisture, seasonal variation in vegetation, snow depth, and the water resistance of the surface due to urbanization. The warning time associated with slow-rise floods assists with life and property protection. As the slope ofthe river flattens, the velocity slows and the material is deposited. As a result, the lower reaches of many streams pass through the sandy alluvial plains that they have formed. Flood flows can cause these streams to migrate, resulting in a higher and wider floodplain. Developed areas on land originally outside the defined floodplain can later flood. The area adjacent to a river channel is the floodplain. Floodplains are illustrated on inundation maps, which show areas ofpotential flooding and water depths. In its common usage, the floodplain most often refers to that area that is inundated by the 100-year flood, the flood that has a one percent chance in any given year ofbeing equalled or exceeded. The 100-year flood is the national minimum standard to which communities regulate their floodplains through the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Urban flooding can occur in any terrain. It is particularly aggravated where natural cover has been removed to construct buildings, roads, and parking lots. Streets become rivers, inundating vehicles and causing damage to residential and industrial properties situated along stream channels. Dam failure may also result in flooding, often creating a flash flood. Dams are manmade structures built for a variety ofuses including flood protection, power, agriculture, water supply, and recreation. When dams are constructed for flood protection, they usually are engineered to August2014 Final Page 35 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan withstand a flood with a computed risk ofoccurrence. For example, a dam may be designed to contain a flood at a location on a stream that has a certain probability ofoccurring in anyone year. If a larger flood occurs, then that structure will be overtopped. Overtopping is the primary cause ofearthen dam failure in the United States. Dam failures can result from anyone or a combination ofthe following causes: prolonged periods of rainfall and flooding resulting in excess overtopping flows, earthquake, improper design and/or maintenance, inadequate spillway capacity, internal erosion, or failure ofupstream dams. Failed dams can create floods that are catastrophic to life and property as a result ofthe tremendous energy ofthe released water. A catastrophic dam failure could easily overwhelm local response capabilities and require mass evacuations to save lives. Factors that influence the potential severity ofa full or partial dam failure are the amount ofwater impounded and the distance to, density, type, and value ofdevelopment and infrastructure located downstream. There are eleven major dams either in or adjacent to Merced County (see list below) with known populations in their respective inundation areas. Virtually no urban area in the County is free from flooding in the event ofdam failure. • McSwain Reservoir • Lake Yosemite • Burns Reservoir • Little Panache Reservoir • Owens Reservoir • McClure Reservoir • Bear Reservoir • Mariposa Reservoir • San Luis Reservoir • O'Neill Forebay • Los Banos Creek Detention Reservoir The potential for flooding can change and increase through various land use changes and changes to land surface, which result in changes to the floodplain. Environmental changes can create localized flooding problems in and outside ofnatural floodplains by altering or confining natural drainage channels. These changes are most often created by human activity. Encroachment into areas subject to inundation by floodwaters having rapid flows aggravates the risk of flood damage and heightens potential flood hazards by further increasing velocities. To reduce the risk ofproperty damage in areas where the stream flows are high, the community may wish to restrict development in areas outside the f1oodway. The area between the f100dway and I-percent-annual-chance floodplain boundaries is termed the f100dway fringe. The f100dway fringe encompasses the portion ofthe floodplain that could be completely obstructed without increasing the water-surface elevation ofthe base flood more than 1 foot at any point. Typical relationships between the f100dway and the f100dway fringe and their significance to floodplain development are shown in schematic in the following. August 2014 Final Page 36 Merced County OperationalArea Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Floodway Schematic 1....----- 1-PfRCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE FLOODPLAIN ------1-1 F~OOOWAY ---+.,J.~oo,)WAYI Hll"G~ "~=·1· STREAM -l 1- Ct1Ar~~'H I i F\.OOO Ei..EvATlON WI-'tN I CONFINE::> WITHI~j F~OOOWA.·' i I I H.cROA("'ME~71 AP:/tA.OF Fi..OOOP:.,AIN Tl-'AT COULD BE uSED FOil "-__~~LOOOHEvriOfl; BEtORf DE YflOPM(NT BY RAIS~fliQ GROUND EfolCROAC"lMi"N r0 ... hQODP\.A1N LINE AS IS niE Fl.OOO ELEVATION BEFORE ENCROACHMENT LINE CD IS 1Hf Ft_OOD EUVAflON AfTER ENCROACHMENT -'SuA.CHA9-G£ IS 1II0T TO £KCEED 1 0 FOOT (l:IA REQIJ!REMENT)OR :..ESSE~ A!IJIOUl'.j:'r IF SPE(lFIEJ BY S'!'ATE Source: Flood Insurance Study, Merced County - FEMA, 2010 Geographic Extent and Potential Magnitude The Merced River, in the central part ofCalifornia, is a 14S-mile (233 km)-longtributary of the San joaquin River flowing from the Sierra Nevada into the Central Valley. It is most well-known for its swift and steep course through the southern part ofYosemite National Park, and the world famous Yosemite Valley. The river's character changes dramatically once it reaches the foothills and the lowlands, becoming a slow-moving waterway meandering through irrigated fields. Large scale irrigated agriculture was introduced to the Central Valley in the late 19th century, and led to the construction of numerous state, federal and privately owned dams. The San joaquin River swings northwest, passing through many different channels, some natural and some man-made. Northeast ofDos Palos, it is joined by the Fresno and Chowchilla Rivers. Fifty miles downstream, the Merced River empties into the San joaquin. Canal and flood control development in the late 1800's and early 1900's redirected water flow and managed waterways through a series ofcanals, water storage and agricultural levies. This led to the conversion on thousands of acres oflake basin land into farmable ground. August2014 Final Page 37 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Merced River Source: Merced Couuty website The Tenaya, Yosemite, Bridalveil and Pigeon Creeks join the Merced River before it breaches the glacial moraine at the valley's end. From there the river picks up Cascade Creek and turns south near EI Portal, flowing through Merced River Canyon. State Route 140 follows the river out ofthe west entrance to the national park, a few miles before the South Fork Merced River, the largest tributary, joins from the left. The river arcs northwest to receive the North Fork, and a few miles after it enters Lake McClure, formed by New Exchequer Dam. Below New Exchequer, the river flows west through a heavily irrigated region ofthe Central Valley, passing through McSwain and Crocker-Huffman Dams and the cities ofHopeton, Delhi and Livingston. It joins the San joaquin River at Hills Ferry, a few miles south ofTurlock. There are also many lakes in the watershed of the Merced River, induding Merced Lake, Tenaya Lake, the Chain Lakes, May Lake, Lake McClure, and Lake McSwain. The Merced River is the third largest tributary ofthe San joaquin River. The primary cause of local flooding is due to the drainage patterns that flow towards the San joaquin River Basin and Merced County. The numerous tributaries ofthe San joaquin - the Fresno, Chowchilla, Merced, Tuolumne, Mariposa Creek, Calaveras, Mokelumne, and others flowed freely across alluvial flood plains to join the river. All ofthe major tributaries ofthe river originate in the Sierra Nevada. Most ofthe streams that start in the Coast Range are intermittent, and contribute little to the flow of the San Joaquin. During the winter, spring, and early summer, storms and snowmelt swell the river. In 1914 - before the development ofmajor dams and irrigation diversions - the California Department ofEngineering estimated the river's flow in full flood at 325,000 cubic feet per second (cfs). In late summer and autumn, there is little water left over to replenish stream flow. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Federal Insurance Administration have assessed flood hazards for major streams in Merced County. The largest flood ofrecord on the Merced River was 46,200 cubic feet per second (cfs) and occurred on December 4,1950, downstream of Old Exchequer Dam (built in Mariposa County in 1926). The New Exchequer Dam, August 2014 Final Page 38 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has more flood storage capacity, was built in 1967. Based on USGS stream data, the largest discharges along the Merced River since the construction of New Exchequer Dam occurred in 1983 followed by 1997. The floodplain ofthe Merced River is well defined from the eastern county boundary to approximately 10 miles above the mouth ofthe river. Downstream ofthis point, the floodplain is undifferentiated from the valley floor and major floods can spread out over large areas. Floodplain storage reduces peak flows in the downstream direction. With the diminishing channel capacity ofthe Merced River, flood hazards increase. During the 1950 flood event, approximately 19,600 acres ofland along the Merced River were inundated, including the towns of Snelling and Merced Falls. During the major flood events in 1969, 1997, 1998, and 2006, Bear Creek overflowed at the southwest end ofthe City ofMerced in the vicinity ofThornton Avenue and State Highway 140. Stream gage data is not available to quantify the magnitude ofthese events. Historical records also indicate that Bear Creek overflowed its banks upstream from the GStreet Bridge. This overflow was worsened by debris restricting flow under the bridge. The largest flood on the San joaquin River since the completion ofFriant Dam in 1943 occurred in 1997. Along the San joaquin River during the past century, the five largest flood events include, in order ofmagnitude, those from 1997, 1938, 1983, 1969, and 2006 based on USGS data. The historical San joaquin River floodplain widens from approximately 3 to 4 miles in the reach south ofMerced County to approximately 19 miles in central Merced County. This large expansion ofthe floodplain is accompanied by a decrease in channel slope. The floodplain then narrows to approximately 2 miles downstream ofthe Merced River in the northern part ofthe county. The Merced River's primary human use is irrigation. The Merced Irrigation District (MID) operates most ofthe irrigation infrastructure, which supplies water to 154,394 acres (624.81 km') offarmland. As a whole, the system includes about 4,000 sets ofcontrol gates and 793 miles (1,276 km) of canals. Irrigation has taken most ofthe water out ofthe lower river, which now rarely reaches the sea. Water that does return to the river does so in for form ofirrigation return flows, which carry pesticides, fertilizer and other pollutants. The MID is federally required to allow at least 15,000 acre feet (19,000,000 m3) ofwater annually to flow continually down the river, not including flooding. The water has allowed the San joaquin River below the Merced River confluence to contain water, while above the confluence all ofits water is usually diverted for irrigation. A large portion ofMerced County continues to be subject to inundation during flood events, as approximately 380,010 acres have been determined to be in the FEMA floodplain. The physical risks associated with potential flooding and the regulatory requirements for floodplain management are important considerations when decisions are being made regarding future land use throughout the County. Those same risks guide the local and community-level emergency response needs. Economic growth and prosperity in Merced County is dependent upon federal, state, and local agency involvement on regional and local flood management systems. Flood protection regulations within California have been increased over the past few years through legislation. This legislation included the requirement for the California Department ofWater Resources and Central Valley Flood Protection Board to prepare and adopt a Central Valley Flood Protection Plan (CVFPP) by 2012. The legislation also established certain flood protection requirements for local land use decision-making based on the CVFPP. The law sets a higher standard for flood protection for the entire San joaquin Valley. The st:mdard was set for an August2014 Final Page 39 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Merced Irrigation District Water Shed System August 2014 Final Page 40 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan urban level flood protection necessary to withstand a 1 in 200 chance of a flood event occurring in any given year (200-year flood) for areas developed or planned to have a population ofat least 10,000. It also requires impacted counties to collaborate with cities to develop flood emergency response plans. In 2009, FEMA completed their Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) conversion and updated a number offlood zone areas using 2005 levee certification criteria. In 2007, the California Department ofWater Resources completed their Awareness Floodplain Mapping of Merced County to identify all pertinent flood hazard areas that are not mapped under FEMA's program, which provides an additional resource for identifying special flood hazard areas within the County. The average annual precipitation in Merced County is 11 to 13 inches, increasing eastward. The following map shows the extent offlooding from both a 100-year and 500-year flood events. Both are critical events in Merced County as the flooding would cover at least 35 to 50 percent ofthe County. Previous Occurrences Between 1992 and 2002, every county in California was declared a federal disaster area at least once for a flooding event. California has a chronic and destructive flood history. Half ofthe 72 federally declared disasters in California between 1950 and 2000 were flood related. Historically, floods have been the most frequent cause ofdisaster in Merced County. Significant flooding occurs in Merced County approximately every five years. Merced County was declared a disaster area by the federal government eight times between 1955 and 2012. FEMA's Flood Insurance Study listed flooding events in 1937-38, 1950, 1955, 1969, 1983, 1997, 1998, and 2006. Probability ofFuture Occurrences Due to the history ofpast flooding events and the natural drainage pattern ofthe planning area, flooding in Merced County is likely to continue to occur. There is no evidence to indicate that flooding due to dam failure is likely. August 2014 Final Page 41 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Merced County 100 and 500 -year Flood Boundary Map .l/ercetl C()UII~I' il/ulfi-Ha:'(l/'{I il/ifigalioll PIC/II PnntDate Dec 2, 2013 D<1t::l SOlICes' MerCed County, Cal EMA, FEMA Flood Zones Source: Planning Team August2014 Final Page 42 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan SEVERE WEATHER Drought Hazard Description Drought is a gradual phenomenon. Normally, one dry year does not constitute a drought in California, but rather serves as a reminder ofthe need to plan for droughts. California's extensive system ofwater supply infrastructure (reservoirs, groundwater basins, and interregional conveyance facilities) generally mitigates the effects ofshort-term dry periods for most water users. Drought can have secondary impacts. For example, drought is a major determinant ofwildfire hazard, in that it creates greater propensity for fire starts and larger, more prolonged conflagrations fueled by excessively dry vegetation, along with reduced water supply for firefighting purposes. Drought is also an economic hazard. Significant economic impacts on California's agriculture industry can occur as a result ofshort- and long-term drought conditions; these include hardships to farmers, farm workers, packers, and shippers ofagricultural products. In some cases, droughts can also cause significant increases in food prices to the consumer due to shortages. The drought issue is further compounded by water rights specific to any state or region. Water is a commodity possessed under a variety of legal doctrines. The prioritization ofwater rights between agriculture and federally protected fish habitat in the state is also an issue. Geographic Extent and Potential Magnitude Droughts are generally widespread events that could affect all of Merced County and surrounding counties. Impacts include water restrictions associated with domestic supplies, agricultural and livestock losses and economic impacts, hydroelectric power reductions, and increased costs for water. Secondary effects include susceptibility to wildfires and increased groundwater pumping that can contribute to land subsidence problems and degraded water quality. The magnitude ofa drought's impact is directly related to the severity and length. Droughts can be a short-term event over several months or a long-term event that lasts for years or even decades. In Merced County, the onset ofdrought is often signalled by a lack ofsignificant winter precipitation and snowfall in the Sierra Nevada Mountains. Hot and dry conditions that persist into spring, summer, and fall can aggravate drought conditions, making the effects ofdrought more pronounced as water demands increase during the growing season and summer months. Impacts increase with the length ofa drought, as carry-over supplies in reservoirs are depleted and water levels in groundwater basins decline (California Department ofWater Resources 2012). The drought status in California is noted on the following graphic from the National Drought Mitigation Center, this graphic is followed by the United States outlook. Previous Occurrences Historically, California has experienced severe drought conditions. The state's available record for determining hydrologic risks is short, only going back about 100 years. Recent droughts affecting Merced County are summarized below using data from Cal OES and from the County Agricultural Commissioner's Office. • 1928-1937-This drought affected the entire state and is the longest, most severe drought on record with a recurrence interval ofgreater than 100 years. August2014 Final Page 43 ~ tiS U.S. Drought Monitor ~ August 26, 2014 IReleased Thursday. Aug. 28. 2014) '"N ""... California Valid 8 a.m. EDT ~ e. Druuglll CatHifIIt.HI~ (PlH<:eulll'''''J None IJlI.04 D'.oD{ i~;l!i • Cumnt 0.00 lJO.oo '00.00 95.42 0.00 100.00 97.50 8l.92 158.41 '-"".-..,...". 'JO.OO 3~f:OO I 0.00 1100.001100.00110000178.81 12/L77 _'" C.I...... Y... I 2.6' 197.39 I 94.25 I 87.53 I 27.5il1 O.OD stoll of WiIlerYe. I 263 I 97.37 IllU5 I 94.12 I II.:» I 0.00 ....." OneYearAgo 10.00 11JO.00188.23! 93.381 '1.:» 1 ODD ..,17/11'" Intensify: CIt J\IlI!tonn~ Oly III 03 ~Dro.ght 01 __Drought _ D4 E_nal"rough' C! :lkVl:~ 0l"lN9ht The DrOfIg#tt Montfor ~ on b~cHcafeconditioN;. lDcai COi1dl'6ons l'IHIy vary. See accompanytrq text suJnmMy b~l:I"teIl(~I~dl¥. 3:: t-~ Author: " ~ David Sim..rai o~ "-'" Western Regional C1mate Cenler ;:& "oq" "3::~ USDA ;l~ ®., "~" ~: ~ """ ...,;J:J.: - : ~...... l::l !:t. t2'" ,;:~tfM~1r.VltfltmO';-,~,- .• 0". g '" a- c 0 :l:: ""'~- hUp:lldroughtmonitor.unl.edul "'"'" iii :0 ~ August 26, 2014 B; u.s. Drought Monitor (Released Thursday, Aug. 28, 2014) ~ Valid 8 a.m. EDT "'"~ "'" 51 e. ~ ~ ..~ c:= zi IIIa. ... o '" e!.;=Iii 0'" ...o ...0 Droughtlrooact TWIe§: g ~ r'" lJeltneate8 dOmInant Impaus ~ C§. S = Short-Term, 1ypicoIIy less Ihan i!i ;; 6 mooths (e.g. agriculture, gmssIands) g. § L = Long-I enn, ~"'Iy grelllertn.n ~ a: 6 mooths (e.g. hydrolcgy, ecolo!;y) § o' 'ntensity: Q ii1 Author: c:J 00 Abnormally Dry :a- David Simeral D 01 M_rate Drought !!i Western Regional C6mate Center [!!!iJ 02 S"""re Drought III 03 ExlJeme OIO.ght • D4 Exceptional Croughl s~ ,,"-" '" 1lIeDroug/Jt_-.....-. ;:& .scale COid'lkns. Localoondi6ona nuy L lI'Cf)': see aco:x•....".mgtextaunwnary .". " " ,0 I tj~"" ~ ~~ 43::::> ';i.!'1::e·~~~"!'J -. " ." o ·l~~._/': USDA !' .. " €a e<~ t , @"'.a'..·' --f\\ ,. !'!"r'!' ell ,. ~~~~.,,~O".,..· f4 s' .' c' is '"~ ,\.~ .. ".,,:0- http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/ ,,~- °v " g: Merced County OperationalArea Local Hazard Mitigation Plan o 1947-1950-Drought affected the entire state but was most extreme in Southern California. The drought in winter of1950 affected the area from the Kern River basin north to the American River basin. The drought caused two deaths and $33 million in damages. o 1976-1977-The drought of1976-1977 was most severe in the northern three-quarters ofCalifornia, but the impact was experienced statewide because ofthe dependence of southern California on water transfers from the north. The water year 1977 was the driest year of record at almost all gauging stations in the affected area in California, and the water year 1976 was among the five driest in the central and northern Sierra Nevada. The two-year deficiency in runoffaccumulated during the drought is unequalled at gauging stations in the affected area; and this deficiency has a recurrence interval that exceeds 80 years. Crop damages statewide were $2.67 billion. o 1987-1992-California experienced a serious drought due to low precipitation and run off/evels. During this multiyear, multi-county drought, the runoff from the San joaquin Valley was 47 percent ofaverage. In 1991, the U.S. Department ofAgriculture Economic Research Report Agricultural Outlook reported that the Merced River flow would be inadequate to provide sufficient water for agricultural uses for the fifth consecutive year. AUSDA drought disaster declaration was declared. o 2004-2005-0n january 15, 2005, the U.S. Department ofAgriculture (USDA) designated 53 ofCalifornia's 58 counties as natural disaster areas due to damages and losses caused by extreme drought. o 2008-2009 - In june 12, 2008, the Governor proclaimed Merced County as a state disaster area due to the Central Valley Drought. o 2012 - In September 2012, the USDA designated Merced County a contiguous disaster area due to drought that occurred since january 1, 2012. o 2014 - In january 2014, the Governor proclaimed a State ofEmergency and directed state officials to take all necessary actions to prepare for these drought conditions: to assist farmers and communities that are economically impacted by dry conditions and to ensure the state can respond ifCalifornians face drinking water shortages. The Governor also directed state agencies to use less water and hire more firefighters and initiated an expansive water conservation public awareness campaign. Probability ofFuture Occurrences Based on the historical record ofdroughts that have occurred in California since 1862 (143 years), the data indicates that California experiences drought on average every 10 years, which is a 10 percent chance ofoccurring in any given year. In Merced County, based on these probabilities, drought will continue to occur occasionally in the future. Freeze Hazard Description Unseasonable cold temperatures can have large impacts on crops in Merced County. The growing season is approximately 257 days per year, and the frost-free period usually extends from mid February to mid-November. The mean frost-free period in the western part of the county is 225 250 days. Geographic Extent and Potential Magnitude The entire county is susceptible to extreme temperatures. Prolonged freezing temperatures can damage or destroy crops, affecting the economy and agricultural jobs in Merced County. Water August 2014 Final Page 46 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan infrastructure is also at risk from freezing, including line breaks and frozen valve gates affecting the distribution system. The following is the average temperatures in Merced County. Merced County Average Temperatures °C I of Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Average high in of; 54 62 67 75 83 91 Average low in of: 37 40 43 46 52 57 Av. precipitation in inch: 2.6 2.36 2.09 0.94 0.55 0.08 Days with precipitation: Hours of sunshine: Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Average high in of: 96 95 90 80 65 55 Average low in of; 62 60 56 49 41 37 Av. precipitation in inch: 0 0.04 0.16 0.83 1.34 2.09 Days with precipitation: Hours of sunshine: Source: U. S. Climate Data Previous Occurrences The SHELDUS database records six incidents offreezes and severe cold between 1970 and 2005. No injuries or deaths are recorded but millions ofdollars in crop damage occurred. There have been three state emergency declarations, in 1972, 1990 and 1998 for freezes in Merced County. In 1999 and 2007, a state emergency was declared for severe freeze events that occurred. In 2007, 2009 and 2011 and 2012 the USDA designated Merced County as a disaster area due to freeze and extreme cold. During these events, California's San Joaquin Valley farming communities were hit with freezing temperatures that severely affected the region's crops and resulted in Presidential disaster declarations. The declarations made federal funds available to supplement unemployment compensation for farm laborers and other farm industry workers put out ofwork as a direct result oflost seasonal crops. Probability ofFuture Occurrences In the past, severe freezes have occurred every few years. Damaging freezes are recorded for the last 36 years, which is an average ofonce every five years or a probability of19 percent in any given year. Therefore, the probability offuture occurrence is likely. Extreme Heat Hazard Description The tables on the following page show the Heat Index (HI) as a function ofheat and relative humidity. The Heat Index describes how hot the heat-humidity combination makes the air feel. As relative humidity increases, the air seems warmer than it actually is because the body is less able to cool itselfvia evaporation ofperspiration. As the Heat Index rises. so do health risks. Specifically: • When the Heat Index is 90°F, heat exhaustion is possible with prolonged exposure and/or physical activity. • When it is 90° to 105°F, heat exhaustion is probable with the possibility ofsunstroke or August 2014 Final Page 47 Merced County OperationalArea Local Hazard Mitigation Plan heat cramps with prolonged exposure and/or physical activity. • When it is 105° to 129°F, sunstroke, heat cramps or heat exhaustion is likely, and heatstroke is possible with prolonged exposure and/or physical activity. • When it is 130°F and higher, heatstroke and sunstroke are extremely likely with continued exposure. Physical activity and prolonged exposure to the heat increase the risks. The National Weather Service (NWS) will initiate its Heat Index Program Alert procedures when the high temperature is expected to exceed 105° to 110° (depending on local climate) for at least two consecutive days (California SMHP, 2012). Heat Index Chart .\Ir l-emp Relatln." Jlllmldit~· (0 F) 110° 100° 90° Geographic Extent and Potential Magnitude The climate in Merced County is hot and arid, and the entire county is susceptible to extreme heat. The agriculturally dominated central region ofthe county is likely to experience the greatest impacts from large or unseasonable temperature variations. In Merced County, the agricultural industry is most at risk to extreme temperatures. Hot and cold temperature extremes damage crops, affecting the economy and potentially resulting in lost farming jobs. Field workers are susceptible to heat exhaustion and heat stroke. Elderly residents who may live alone and are limited in their mobility are also vulnerable during heat waves. Problems with power loss and water distribution also occur during periods ofextreme heat. Power outages and rolling brownouts can result when high temperatures increase air conditioner use. Power outages can prevent water-pumping stations from operating. The chart on the folloWing page shows average and extreme temperatures at the Merced Municipal Airport weather station in the northeastern part ofthe county (1981-2010) and the Los Banos City weather station in the southwestern part ofthe county (1981-2010). The highest temperature on record is 96.5 at the Los Banos station and 97.1 at the Merced Municipal Airport station. The average high is 90.5 in Los Banos in the summer and 94.5 at the Municipal Airport station. On average, there are 88 days over 90°F in the summer in Los Banos and 99 days per year over 90°F at the Municipal Airport. The hottest months are July and August. August2014 Final Page 48 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan MERCED MUNICIPAL ARPT, CALIFORNIA 1981- 2010 Temperature and Precipitation MERCED MUNICIPAL ARPT, CALIFORNIA (045532) 1981-2810 38 v.... Average llQ ?1~'SS ~ ue 1~'so ...•• ~ I~'~ v 6u e.40 10 ,0.35 ! 6. 0.30 ~ SO o.~ ~ 4e 0.28 :9- 30 o.~ ~ :U 0.10 ..f it o.~ • 0." _1 ~1 _1 Ml .1 ~I •• MI WI ~I _I ~I ~I Day of Voar lk'+'tr... Rt'l.o l Clil'llltt Ctnttf" LOS BANOS, CALIFORNIA 1981 - 2010 Temperatul"e and Precipitation LOS BANOS, CALIFORNIA (04511B) 1981-2818 38 Year Average u. .... "... 1~'sO .. I•·MG.. I1°·35 .." .0.30... .. ~.2G 0.15 " ~.1O ".. .. '" • 0.110 Jlln 1 Mat" 1 11a~ 1 Jut 1 Sep 1 No~1 1 Dec 31 Feb 1 Apr 1 Juo 1 Aug 1 Oct 1 Dec 1 Oag or Year ,,_st...... R• .,i_l Ch.....tt c...t .... Source: Western Regional Climate Center Legend Max. Temp. is the average ofall daily maximum temperatures recorded for the day ofthe year between the years 1981 and 2010. Ave. Temp. is the average ofall daily average temperatures recorded for the day ofthe year between the years 1981 and 2010. Min. Temp. is the average ofall daily minimum temperatures recorded for the day ofthe year between the years 1981 and 2010. Precipitation is the average ofall daily total precipitation recorded for the day of the year between the years 1981 and 2010. August2014 Final Page 49 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Previous Occurrences The SHELDUS database lists three incidents ofextreme heat in Merced County from 1960-2005. These occurred in June 1961, with $14,705 in crop damages reported, in August 1992 and September 1998. No damages are known for the 1992 and 1998 events. During 2005, 2006, 2008, and 2009 Merced County received USDA emergency designations twice for heat waves and again in 2012. o 1.03 o 1.03 Source: SHELDUS ProbabilityofFuture Occurrences Temperatures at or above 95°F are common most summer days throughout Merced County, and it is highly likely that extreme heat will continue to occur on an annual basis in the future. WILDFIRE Hazard Description Fire conditions arise from a combination of hot weather, an accumulation ofvegetation, and low moisture content in the air. These conditions, when combined with high winds and periods of drought, increase the potential for wildfire. Fires also occur in areas where development has expanded into rural areas. In this wildland-urban interface, fires can result in major losses of property and structures. Generally, there are three major factors that sustain wildfires and are used to predict a given area's potential to burn: fuel, topography, and weather. Fuel is the material that feeds a fire and is a key factor in wildfire behavior. Fuel is generally classified by type and by volume. Fuel sources are diverse and include everything from dead tree needles and leaves, twigs, and branches to standing dead trees, live trees, brush, and cured grasses. Manmade structures and other associated combustibles are also fuel sources. The type of prevalent fuel directly influences the behavior ofwildfire. Light fuels, such as grasses, burn quickly and serve as a catalyst for fire spread. The volume ofavailable fuel is described in terms of fuel loading. Topography is the key factor that affects an area's susceptibility to wildfire spread. Fire intensities and rates ofspread increase as slope increases due to the tendency ofheat from a fire to rise via convection. The natural arrangement ofvegetation throughout a hillside can also contribute to increased fire activity on slopes. Topography also affects the ability of response crews and vehicles to reach fires in a timely manner due to steep and winding roads. Weather components, such as temperature, relative humidity, wind, and lightning, also affect the potential for wildfire. High temperatures and low relative humidity dry out the fuels that feed the wildfire creating a situation where fuel will more readily ignite and burn more intensely. Wind is the most treacherous weather factor. The greater wind speed, the faster a fire will spread, and the more intense it will be. In addition to high winds, wind shifts can occur suddenly due to temperature changes or the interaction ofwind with topographical features, such as slopes or August2014 Final Page 50 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan steep hillsides. Related to weather is the issue ofrecent drought conditions contributing to concerns about wildfire vulnerability. During periods of drought, the threat ofwildfire increases. Geographic Extent and Potential Magnitude Both urban and wildland fires conditions exist in Merced County which increases the chances for damage to property, loss oflife and/or injury. In most ofMerced County, the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal FIRE) ranks fuel loading as low. Fuels are mainly crops and grasses. In the southwest corner, there are some brush, pine, and grass fuels, which are ranked as moderate fuel hazards, primarily in the area west of Interstate 5. Generally, fire season in Merced County extends from early spring to late fall. Onset can happen suddenly due to lightning or human causes factors and wildfires can last from a few hours to a few months, but the likely hood ofa large and damaging fire lasting for months in Merced County is not likely. Secondary effects from wildfire include increased erosion, degraded air and water quality, and economic impacts from burned landscapes. Urban fires primarily involve the uncontrolled burning ofresidential, commercial and/or industrial structures generally caused by human activities. The California Department ofForestry and Fire Protection's Fire and Resource Assessment Program (FRAP) assesses the amount and extent ofCalifornia's forests and rangelands, analyzes their conditions and identifies alternative management and policy guidelines. Assessments conducted periodically by Cal FIRE's Fire and Resource Assessment Program (FRAP), link together state requirements for natural resource inventories and strategies and the federal government's desire to rely more heavily on these state programs in determining priorities for funding. The FRAP map below depicts fire hazard severity zones identified by the assessment. State Responsibility Areas (SRA) are the areas ofthe state where the State of California is financially responsible for the prevention and suppression of wildfires. Below is the FRAP map that depicts the fire hazard severity zones in the SRAs for Merced County. August2014 Final Page 51 Merced County OperationalArea Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Draft Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map· LRA " , ! August 2014 Final Page 52 Merced County OperationalArea Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Merced County Wildfire Hazards Map Legend Fire Hazard S4!v.rity Zones' Moder3te High ~VeryHigh • Areas of $igmfiC3nt fire haZards a base August2014 Final Page 53 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Previous Occurrences There have not been any state or federal disaster declarations in Merced County related to wildfire in the past. The Planning Team noted that although there are many fire starts, the fuels are "flashy" and fires are usually quickly put out. The table below shows the most recent historic fires mapped by Cal FIRE. Recent Wildfire Historv in Merced Countv I n~... .. I.. _. . A D ••_._" • I -_.~. ~~..,~ June 4, 2013 152 Fire 124 Cal FIRE Mav 31, 2012 Billv Fire 434 Cal FIRE lulv 23, 2011 Romero Fire 489 Cal FIRE June 26, 2011 Rest Fire 575 Cal FIRE lune 11, 2010 Robinson Fire 1,600 Cal FIRE lune 5, 2010 Childs Fire 462 Cal FIRE Source: Cal FIRE Redbooks Probability ofFuture Occurrences Fire starts are highly likely during each fire season; though, they rarely result in large-scale wildfires. Information obtained from the Cal FIRE Redbook lists multiple fires, the largest in the most recent past consumed approximately 1,600 acres, with most wildfires in the area being controlled at less than 500 acres. Based on climate and weather in Merced County and the fuels, topography, and fire history (average 2 major fires each year) in the southwestern and eastern border parts ofthe county, it is likely that fires will continue to occur in the future. August2014 Final Page 54 Merced Coun1J1 OperationalArea Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Merced Fire History - Decade Map Vicinity Map Legend Fire History Decade r~~j 19£0.-1969 1970,1979 1980,1989 1990-1999 W%1l2QOO-2012 .ll<'rced CO"I/'Y .lllllti·Hazard JlitigilliQI/ Plall P'~!C;M March 2~.;:;O!..g ['tolL' S!ll,l'-..fI!';o M",;-,,:: C",",I\1t'i !;;\! E'MI\. fEMA Fire History August2014 Final Page 55 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Summary ofHazards The table below summarizes the results ofthe hazard profiles and assigns a level ofoverall planning significance to each hazard oflow, medium, or high. Significance was determined based on the hazard profile, focusing on key criteria such as frequency and resulting damage, including deaths/injuries and property, crop, and economic damage. This assessment was used by the Planning Team to prioritize those hazards ofgreatest significance to the operational area; thus enabling the County to focus resources where they are most needed. Those hazards that occur infrequently or have little or no impact on the operational area were determined to be oflow significance. Hazard Profile Summary by Jurisdiction The following tables summarize the data provided by the Planning Team on the potential magnitude and the probability ofoccurrence for each ofthe identified hazards across the planning area. Potential Ma nitude ofIdentified Hazards in Merced Conn Dam Failure Catastrophic Negligible N/A Catastrophic Earthquake Critical Critical Limited Limited Flood Critical Critical Limited Limited Severe Critical Critical Limited Catastrophic Weather Wildfire Critical Limited Limited Limited Source: Merced County Planning Team Probabili ofOccurrence for Identified Hazards in Merced Coun Dam Failure Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Earthquake Occasional Occasional Likely Flood Likely Likely Likely Severe Likely Likely Likely Weather Wildfire Likely Occasional Highly Likely Occasional Source: Merced County Planning Team August2014 Final Page 56 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Element 8.3. Vulnerability Assessment §201.6(c)(2)(ii): [The risk assessment shall include aJ descriptian ofthejurisdiction's vulnerability to the hazards described in paragraph (c)(2)(i) ofthis section. This description shall include an overall summary ofeach hazard and its impact on the community. All plans approved after October 1, 200S mustalso address NFlP insured structures that have been repetitively damaged byfloods. §201.6(c)(2)(ii)(A): The types and numbers ofexisting and future bUildings, infrastructure, and critical facilities located in the identified hazard areas; §201.6(c)(2)(ii)(B): An estimate ofthe potential dollar losses to vulnerable structures identified in ... this section and a description ofthe methodology used to prepare the estimate. §201.6(c)(2)(ii)(C): Providing a general description ofland uses and development trends within the community so that mitigation options can be considered in future land use decisions. Methodology The vulnerability assessment further defines and quantifies populations, buildings, critical facilities, and other community assets at risk to natural hazards. The vulnerability assessment for this plan followed the methodology described in the FEMA 386·2, Understanding Your Risks Identifying Hazards and Estimating Losses (2012). The vulnerability assessment was conducted based on the best available data and the significance ofthe hazard. Data to support the vulnerability assessment was collected from the folloWing sources: • County and jurisdictional GIS data (hazards, base layers, and other government data) • Statewide GIS datasets compiled by Cal OES to support mitigation planning • FEMA's HAZUS loss estimation software • Written descriptions ofassets and risks provided by participating jurisdictions • Existing plans and reports • Personal interviews with Planning Team members and other stakeholders 111 The vulnerability assessment first describes the assets at risk in Merced County, including the total exposure ofpeople and property; critical facilities and infrastructure; natural, cultural, and historic resources; and economic assets. Secondly, the assessment considers the social vulnerability ofthe county to hazards, including characteristics ofgender, age, race/ethnicity, and wealth and poverty. Assets at Risk This section assesses the population, structures, critical facilities and infrastructure, and other important assets in Merced County at risk to natural hazards. Total Exposure to Hazards The table on the following page shows the total population, number of structures, and assessed value ofimprovements to parcels by jurisdiction. Land values have been purposely excluded because land remains following disasters, and subsequent market devaluations are frequently short term and difficult to quantify. Additionally, state and federal disaster assistance programs generally do not address loss ofland or its associated value. August2014 Final Page 57 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan The greatest exposure ofpeople and property are concentrated in the cities ofMerced, Atwater and Los Banos, though significant population and structures are spread out in the unincorporated areas ofthe county. Maximum Populatiou and Building Exposure by Jurisdiction , . . .- J' Number Yaiue Merced County Unincorporated 102,977 31,256 $3,957 mil Areas Atwater 25,230 8,856 $816 mil Livingston 13,548 3,637 $512 mil Los Banos 34,130 10,854 $1,421 mil Total 162,337 50,966 $6,194 mil Source: Merced County Planning Team data, 2010 U.S. Census and Merced County Land Use Report (2012) Critical Facilities and Infrastructure A critical facility may be defined as one that is essential in providing utility or direction either during the response to an emergency or during the recovery operation. FEMA's HAZUS loss estimation software uses the following three categories ofcritical assets (Essential Facilities, High Potential Loss Facilities and Transportation and Lifelines). Essential facilities are those that if damaged would have devastating impacts on disaster response and/or recovery. High potential loss facilities are those that would have a high loss or impact on the community. Transportation and lifeline facilities are a third category ofcritical assets. • Hospitals and other • Power Plants • Highways, Bridges Medical Facilities • Dams/levees and Tunnels • Schools • Military installations • Railroads and • Police Stations • Hazardous Material Facilities • Fire Stations Sites • Bus Facilities • Emergency • Shelters • Airports Operation Centers • Day Care Centers • Water Treatment • Nursing Homes Facilities • Main Government • Natural Gas Facilities Buildings and Pipelines • Oil Facilities and Pipelines Source: Planning Team, Department ofFinance The table on the following page displays the inventory ofavailable data on essential facilities in Merced County as provided by HAZUS. The HAZUS scenario uses a 5.0 magnitude to define the earthquake parameters used for the earthquake loss estimate. August 2014 Final Page 58 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Essential Facility Damage HAZUS Estimated Essential Facility Damage - 5.0 MEarthquake Before the earthquake, the region had Z88 hospita:l beds available for use. On the day ofthe earthquake, the model estimates that only 275 hospital beds (96.00%) are available for use by patients already in the hospital and those injured by the earthquake. After one week, 100.00% ofthe beds will be back in service. By 30 days. 100.00% will be operational. Hos itals 3 0 3 Schools 121 0 121 EOCs o 0 o Police Stations 23 0 23 FireStations 6 0 6 Source: HAZUS, FEMA Other facilities in the county, such as locations that hold musical concerts, sporting events, and other events that attract large numbers ofpeople, mayalso be at higher risk due to concentrations ofpopulation. These include, but are not limited to, the Merced County Fairgrounds, the historic Merced Theatre, college and high school campuses, and county or city parks. Other critical facilities unique to the county are the California Aqueduct, the Castle Air Museum, and the Federal Bureau ofPrisons located in Atwater. These facilities are better addressed in the emergency operations plans for the county, the two municipalities, and federal emergency plans. The California Aqueduct, part ofthe California State Water Project, runs through the western part of Merced County. The State Water Project is a water storage and delivery system of reservoirs, aqueducts, power plants, and pumping plants. Its main purpose is to store water and distribute it to 29 urban and agricultural water suppliers in Northern California, the San Francisco Bay Area, the San Joaquin Valley, the Central Coast, and Southern California. Seventy percent of the contracted water supply goes to urban users and thirty percent goes to agricultural users. The State Water Project makes deliveries to two-thirds ofCalifornia's population. Earthquakes, landslides, flooding, or other hazard events that disrupt the aqueduct's ability to deliver water could have serious impacts to agriculture in the county and water users in many areas of California. The Castle Air Museum is one ofMerced County's treasures drawing visitors from across the country. Located on the site ofthe former Castle Air Force Base (known as Merced Army Air Field during WWII), the museum has a collection of53 World War II, Korean W, and Vietnam Era aircraft. The indoor museum contains many additional Air Force and Army Air Corps artifacts and a B-52 simulator. The Federal Bureau ofPrisons in Atwater is one ofthe larger employers in the city with over 100 employees and approximately 1600 prisoners. Although this plan recognizes the critical assets ofthis facility and its role in the county's economy, as federally owned property, the prison develops its separate emergency management plans. August2014 Final Page 59 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Natural, Historical, and Cultural Assets Assessing the vulnerability of Merced County to disaster also involves inventorying the natural, historical, and cultural assets ofthe area. This step is important for the following reasons: • The community may decide that these types of resources warrant a greater degree of protection due to their unique and irreplaceable nature and contribution to the overall economy. • Ifthese resources are impacted by a disaster, knowing so ahead oftime allows for more prudent care in the immediate aftermath, when the potential for additional impacts are higher. • The rules for reconstruction, restoration, rehabilitation, and/or replacement are often different for these types ofdesignated resources. • Natural resources can have beneficial functions that reduce the impacts of natural hazards, such as wetlands and riparian habitat, which help absorb and attenuate floodwaters. Natural resources are also important to include in benefit-cost analyses for future projects and may be used to leverage additional funding for mitigation projects that also contribute to community goals for protecting sensitive natural resources. Awareness of natural assets can lead to opportunities for meeting multiple objectives. For instance, protecting wetlands areas protects sensitive habitat as well as attenuates and stores floodwaters. There are many natural resources that are importantto Merced County, a detailed description ofthose resources can be found in the Resource Conservation Element ofthe Merced County General Plan. Merced County Courthouse Historical and Cultural Resources Merced County has a number ofhistorical sites. The National Register of Historic Places lists eighteen locations within Merced County and five additional sites that have been designated as California's Historical Landmarks. The National Register of Historic Places in Merced County include the Bank ofltaly (also known as Mondo building), Bank of Los Banos building (also known as The Old Bank Building), Bloss Mansion (also known as Bloss Home), Bubach Grammar School (also known as Bubach Preschool), Church ofSt. joseph, Major George Beecher Cook House (also known as the Greenbrier), First Merced County Courthouse Building, john C. Fremont House, Kaehler-Rector House (also known as judge Rector Home), Lake Yosemite Water Tower, Leggett House (also known as Queen Anne Inn), Thomas H. Leggett House, Merced County Courthouse, Merced County High School (also known as County Library Building), Merced Theatre (also known as New Merced Theatre), San Luis Gonzaga Archeological District, Tioga Hotel, and the U.S. Post Office (also known as Federal Building/U.S. Post Office - Bell Station). Other historic sites of local importance also exist. These include several cemeteries and churches located in the larger cities and other rural areas in the county. The five additional sites designated as California Historical Landmarks include the Canal Farm Inn, Los Banos Park, Merced Assembly Center at Merced County Fairgrounds, Pacheco Pass at Romero Outlook, and Snelling Courthouse. Other notable sites include Applegate Park; one ofMerced's central parks located along the Bear Creek Bikeway. The park is an excellent destination on bike or foot. It offers 32 acres of August 2014 Final Page 60 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan recreation with a zoo, outdoor theater, picnic tables, barbeque grills, volleyball nets, tennis/basketball courts, a skate park, rental facilities, a large playground, a rose garden and fountain, and the Kiwanas-sponsored Kiddieland amusement park Applegate Park is located along Bear Creek and the Bear Creek bikeway, between Mand RStreets. The southern edge of the park follows 25th Street, P Street, and 26th Street. Merced County is also the home ofThe Merced National Wildlife Refuge which encompasses 10,258 acres ofwetlands, native grasslands, vernal pools, and riparian areas. It was established in 1951 under the Lea Act to attract wintering waterfowl away from adjacent farmland where foraging ducks and geese were causing extensive damage to crops. It should be noted that as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), any property over 50 years of age is considered a historic resource and is potentially eligible for the National Register. Thus, in the event that the property is to be altered or has been altered, the property must be evaluated under the guidelines set forth bythe CEQA and NEPA. Structural mitigation projects, such as earthquake retrofits, are included in this regulation. Economic Assets Economic assets at risk may include major employers or primary economic sectors, such as, agriculture, whose losses or inoperability would have severe impacts on the community and its ability to recover from disaster. After a disaster, economic vitality is the engine that drives recovery. Every community has a specific set ofeconomic drivers, which are important to understand when planning ahead to reduce disaster impacts to the economy. When major employers are unable to return to normal operations, impacts ripple throughout the community. The table below shows Merced County's civilian labor force and employment rates as provided by the State ofCalifornia Employment Development Department, 2013. County ofMerced Employment Data Civilian Labor Force 104,600 Civilian Employment 86,900 Civilian Unemployment 17,600 Civilian Unemployment Rate 16.9% State of California Unemployment Rate 10.9% Source: State ofCalifornia Employment Development Department, (www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov) Statistics indicate that Merced County has approximately 5,500 business employers. Government agencies, school districts and educational institutions also employ significant numbers. The County ofMerced is the largest government employer in the county, followed by the city governments in relatively descending order of population. The Merced County Office ofEducation and the elementary and high school districts in Merced County are also significant employers. Merced College and DC Merced are also key employers. Financial institutions based in Merced also employ significant numbers. Utility providers PG&E and Merced Irrigation District also account August2014 Final Page 61 Merced County OperationalArea Local Hazard Mitigation Plan for many jobs. Mercy Medical Center/CHM and Golden Valley Health Center are the top healthcare employers. Medical practitioners and clinics also account for large numbers ofjobs. Retailers with multiple locations in the county are significant employers and include Wal-Mart, Target, SaveMart, Home Depot and Lowe's. Retail and service employment as a sector accounts for over halfofall businesses and one quarter of private business employment. Merced County has approximately 135 manufacturing and processing employers. Food processing and packaging accounts for much ofthe employment base, although other sectors (printing, water craft and building materials) are significant employers. Merced County's manufacturing employment base has been relatively stable and currently employs 13,200. The single largest employer is Foster Farms with nearly 5,000 workers. Foster Farms 5,000 Livingston Golden Valley Health Center 1,000 Merced Hilmar Cheese Company 1,000 Hilmar JMarchini & Son 1,000 Le Grand Merced County Human Services 1,000 Merced Merced Medical Center 5,000 Merced Quad/Graphics Inc. 1,000 Merced University ofCA - Merced 1,000 Merced Western Marketing & Sales 1,000 Atwater Source: Merced Couuty Economic Development Corporation, 2012 UC Merced's presence in the community introduces significant economic opportunity for Merced, as well as the possibility ofprofound community change. Merced is well prepared for this change with community planning and infrastructure systems. Aleading agricultural county, Merced is one ofthe top ten agricultural counties in the state. A resurgence in commodity prices sent gross production values to a record high of$3.2B in 2012. Milk remains as Merced County's leading commodity with a value of $940 million, even though there was a 14% drop in value due to a 40% drop in production ofmilk used in manufacturing. Almonds, cattle and calves, chickens, and sweet potatoes follow milk to round out Merced County's five leading commodities. Agricultural losses resulting from natural hazards can have dramatic impacts on the economic health ofMerced County. Past losses to agricultural commodities due to extreme weather have occurred at a rate ofapproXimately one event per year since 1997, which has occurred anytime from April through October. Estimating Potential Losses The Planning Team ranked the significance ofidentified hazards for each jurisdiction. Significance is measured in general, qualitative terms and is a summary ofthe potential impact ofthe hazard based on the geographical area affected, history of past occurrences, potential magnitude, probability ofthe event, and damage and casualty potential. Significance is classified as the follOwing: August 2014 Final Page 62 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan High: Widespread potential impact. This ranking carries the highest threat to the general population and/or built environment. Hazards in this category may have already occurred in the past. Medium: Moderate potential impact. This ranking carries a moderate threat level to the general population and/or built environment. The potential ofoccurrence may be the same as the high ranking, but the potential damage is more isolated and less costly than a more widespread disaster. Low: Minimal potential impact. The occurrence and potential cost ofdamage to life and property is minimal. The table on the following page summarizes the hazard significance within the county developed by the Planning Team for participating jurisdictions in Merced County. School districts are not included in the table. The planning significance ofdifferent hazards depends upon their location in the county. This section assesses vulnerability to those specific hazards ranked ofmedium or high significance. The Planning Team identified three hazards within the planning area where specific geographical hazards are defined: earthquake, flooding, and wildfire. Critical facilities and other assets in these areas were assessed and are described below. The vulnerability to other medium to high significance hazards that do not have specific mapped areas, such as drought, extreme heat, and freeze, are discussed in more general terms at the end of this section. It is also important to be aware that hazard events that happen outside ofthe county boundaries also can have direct and indirect impacts to Merced County. For instance, dam failures and wildfires in watersheds outside the county that drain into it can result in flooding and other impacts related to watershed health. An earthquake or flood as far away as the Sacramento Delta Region could disrupt water supply to the county from the California Aqueduct. Power supply also could be interrupted by earthquake and wildfire hazards outside ofthe county. Si2nificance ofHazard by j ~ ~ .. ~...... tn. Il"nn< Dam Low Low Low Low Failure Earthquake Medium Medium Medium Medium Flood High High High Medium Severe High High High High Weather Wildfire Medium Low Low Low Source: Merced County Plannmg Team 'Unincorporated areas. Earthquake Vulnerabilities • Pre-1973 Homes due to older Earthquake Standards • Historic Buildings • Older bridges, overpasses and elevated roadways August 2014 Final Page 63 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitination Plan • Water, Gas and Sewer Lines • Power Distribution Systems • Critical Facilities • People with Disabilities, the Elderly and Access and Functional Needs • Agricultural Buildings • Livestock • Canals and Waterways Earthquake vulnerability is based primarily upon population and the built environment. When the M7.9 Fort Tejon earthquake occurred along the San Andreas Fault in 1857, California was sparsely populated, especially in the regions ofstrongest shaking. The California State Multi Hazard Mitigation Plan (2013) predicts a repeat ofthe 1857 earthquake would cause approximately $150 million in property damage. To mitigate this hazard, building codes in California have been steadily improved over the past 80 years as understanding ofseismic shaking has improved. Current California building codes include provisions for considering the potential shaking from earthquakes, including stronger shaking near faults and amplification by soft soils. The building code has been the main mitigation tool for seismic shaking in most buildings, although hospitals, schools, and other critical facilities are subject to additional mitigation measures (Cal SHMP 2013). The state has an unreinforced masonry program, which requires seismic retrofits or building removal in Zone IV. Unreinforced masonry buildings are generally brick buildings constructed prior to 1933, predating modern earthquake-resistant design. The brick is not strengthened with embedded steel bars and is therefore called unreinforced. There are four seismic zones in the United States ranging from I to IV; the higher the number, the higher the earthquake danger. All of California lies within Seismic Zone III or IV. Stronger construction standards for buildings in Zones III and IV have been adopted in the International Building Code. Most ofMerced County is in Zone III except for the southwestern part, which is in Zone IV. Estimating Potential Losses FEMA's software program for estimating potential losses from disasters, HAZUS, was used to estimate potential losses in Merced County from three earthquake scenarios. The following version MH 2.1 SPl ofHAZUS was used for development ofthe earthquake scenarios. The first scenario was an annualized loss scenario representing long-term average losses based on overall local seismic hazard using a default M5.0, 6.0 and 7.0 assumptions. The table on the following page summarizes the results ofthe three scenarios. The Planning Team also identified the potential impacts ofa major earthquake in Los Angeles or San Francisco Bay Area on the Central Valley and Merced County. Displaced people from these areas may come to the county and require sheltering, medical care, and other local resources. HAZUS Potential Dollar Losses to Vulnerable Structures Annnalized Loss AnnualizedLoss Annualized Loss Type ofImpact Scenario M5.0 Scenario M6.0 Scenario M7.0 3,053 at least 3,053 at least 3,053 at least Total Buildings moderately damaged moderately damaged moderately damaged (4% of total in (4% of total in (4% of total in region) Damaged region), 36 damaged region), 36 damaged 36 damaged beyond beyond renair beyond renair renair August 2014 Final Page 64 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annualized Loss Annualized Loss t~~ss .•• "YPl', Scenario M5.lt Scenario M6.lt Residential Buildings Slight: 9,750 Slight: 9,750 Slight: 9,750 Damaged Moderate: 2329 Moderate: 2329 Moderate: 2329 (single family Extensive: 315 Extensive: 315 Extensive: 315 and other Complete: 31 Complete: 31 Complete: 31 residential1 Building- $202.15 million $202.15 million $202.15 million Related Losses Total Economic Losses $227.42 million $227.42 million $227.42 million (building and lifeline losses1 Without requiring Without requiring Without requiring Casualties hospitalization: 43 hospitalization: 43 hospitalization: 43 (based on Requiring Requiring Requiring 2:00am hospitalization: 4 hospitalization: 4 hospitalization: 4 occurrence) Life threatening: 0 Life threatening: 0 Life threatening: 0 Fatalities: 0 Fatalities: 0 Fatalities: 0 Without requiring Without requiring Without requiring Casualties hospitalization: 33 hospitalization: 33 hospitalization: 33 (based on Requiring Requiring Requiring 5:00pm hospitalization: 5 hospitalization: 5 hospitalization: 5 occurrence) Life threatening: 2 Life threatening: 2 Life threatening: 2 Fatalities: 1 Fatalities: 1 Fatalities: 1 Damage to Transportation odamage odamage odamage Svstems Displaced 56 56 56 Households Shelter 57 people outof210,554 57 people out of 57 people out of210,554 Requirements in region 210,554 in region in region Source:HAZUS2014 Summary ofPotential Impacts According to the HAZUS model, Merced County is susceptible to serious earthquake losses in the millions ofdollars. The overall impact ofearthquakes to Merced County includes: • Potential for injury and loss oflife • Widespread structural damage, particularly in manufactured housing • Loss ofwater, power, roads, phones, and transportation, which can be particularly dangerous for those with certain medical conditions • Power loss complicating response and recovery efforts • Business interruption losses • Agricultural impacts such as field disturbances and damage to irrigation systems • Damage to oil and gas facilities and pipelines The HAZUS earthquake model applies to census tract level data and does not allow for the quantification ofrisk by jurisdiction. Based on the earthquake shaking map and fault locations in the hazard profiles section, Los Banos and the unincorporated community ofSanta Nella are likely to experience stronger ground shaking than the rest ofthe county. August2014 Final Page 65 Merced County OperationalArea Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Older construction and unreinforced masonry buildings are more vulnerable to shaking during earthquakes. Historic buildings can be more susceptible because they have weakened with age and were built before the use ofbuilding codes. Most unreinforced masonry buildings in Merced County are in Gustine, where it is estimated there are 154. HAZUS predicts that building-related losses will primarily occur in manufactured housing in Merced County. The California Aqueduct runs through western Merced County, where seismic hazards are high. Numerous natural gas and oil pipelines, telephone lines, and fiber optic cables also follow the Interstate 5 corridor in western Merced County. These are vulnerable to damage from seismic offset Water wells and oil wells also could be damaged by subsurface slumping. Flood Vulnerabilities • Structures in low lying areas and floodplains • Historic Buildings • Roadways and older Bridges • Levees and Levee Roads • Water, Gas and Sewer Lines • Power Distribution Systems • Critical Facilities • People with Disabilities, the Elderly and Access and Functional Needs • Agricultural Buildings • Livestock • Canals and Waterways • Natural Resources and species Despite the construction of massive and relatively effective flood control projects, California remains vulnerable to flooding. Asteady rise in population and accompanying development contribute to increased flood risks throughout the state. According to the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), four municipalities within Merced County have mapped flood hazard areas. The table on the following page prOVides further information on their participation in the NFIP. HAZUS estimates that there are an estimated 69,000 buildings in the region, which have an aggregate replacement value ofapproximately $12.9 million. Summary ofPotential Impacts Most ofthe flooding in Merced County can be characterized as shallow, sheet flow events. This type of flooding often results in property damage, road washouts, and transportation disruptions. Other general impacts ofthese events may include the following: • Potential for injury and loss of life • Commercial and residential structural damage • Erosion ofstreambeds, roadways and hillsides • Loss ofwater, power, roads, phones, and transportation, which can be particularly dangerous for those with certain medical conditions • Hazardous Materials Contamination oflarge areas due to Agricultural Chemicals, pesticides and petroleum products • Economic impacts (jobs, sales, tax revenue) due to loss of commercial structures • Decline in commercial and residential property values Flood hazards exist primarily along the Merced River. Most ofthe suburban areas located in the August 2014 Final Page 66 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Pian western and eastern parts ofMerced County are not located in mapped 100-year and 500-year floodplain areas. Both are critical events in Merced County as the flooding would cover at least 35 to 50 percent ofthe County. Some critical facilities are located in the 100·year floodplain; however, many are located in the 500-year floodplain. Much of Atwater lies in the 500-year floodplain, which is primarily affected by sheet flow flooding. Cultural or historical sites are also known to be located in flood areas based upon available data. Risk analysis of natural resources was not possible due to data limitations. Natural areas within the floodplain often benefit from periodic flooding as a naturally recurring process. In addition, natural areas help mitigate flood impacts by absorbing flood waters. There are 11 major dams either in or adjacent to Merced County with known populations in their respective inundation areas. Virtually no urban area in the county is free from flooding in the event ofa dam failure. Acatastrophic dam failure, depending on the size ofthe dam and population downstream, could exceed the response capability oflocal communities. This vulnerability warrants a program to educate the general public ofimpending danger and existing evacuation plans. In terms ofeconomic assets, most dairy facilities are also located in flood hazard areas; number offacilities varying between the 100-year floodplain or 500-year floodplain models. Severe Weather Drought Vulnerabilities • Water supply • Natural Habitat • Livestock and Crops • Open space and greenbelts • Natural Resources All of Merced County is vulnerable to drought. Drought is one ofthe few hazards with the potential to impact all the citizens ofthe county through water restrictions, economic losses, and increased energy costs. The urbanized areas ofthe county and the agriculture industry are most likely to experience hardships associated with reduced water supply. Agriculture in the San Joaquin Valley relies on artificial irrigation using mostly imported water and/or groundwater. Local droughts are expected and accommodated for; however, a prolonged statewide drought could exceed local capabilities to handle reductions ofimported surface water supplies and potentially lead to reductions in distribution from local water storage districts. The costs of drought are difficult to quantify because the impacts affect so many different sectors including wildlife and natural resources, business and industry, tourism and recreation, agriculture, and individual households. Agriculture often suffers the most financial losses from drought and is the major component ofthe Merced County economy. According to the Merced County Department of Agriculture 2012 Report on Agriculture, Merced County agriculture commodities grossed $3,280,206,000, in 2012 for a record high. This is the third time that Merced County agriculture has surpassed the three-billion-dollar mark in gross production value. Summary ofPotential Impacts The overall potential impacts from drought include: August2014 Final Page 57 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan • Increased potential for heat injury and loss oflife • Impacts to water quality and watershed health • Impacts to natural resource habitats and other resources, such as agriculture • Loss of water for irrigation • Public Health and Air Quality • Significant economic impacts Gobs, sales tax revenue) • Decline in commercial and residential property values Extreme Heat Vulnerabilities • Agriculture • People with disabilities and the elderly; People with Access and Functional Needs • Water supply • Natural Habitat • Livestock and Crops • Open space and greenbelts • Natural Resources The agricultural industry is most at risk to extreme temperatures. Hot and cold temperature extremes damage crops, affecting the economy and potentially resulting in lost farming jobs. Field workers are susceptible to heat exhaustion and heat stroke. Elderly residents who may live alone and are limited in their mobility are also vulnerable during heat waves. Problems with power loss and water distribution also occur during periods ofextreme heat. Power outages and rolling brownouts can result when high temperatures increase air conditioner use. Power outages have prevented water pumping stations from operating. Summary ofPotential Impacts The overall potential impacts from drought include: • Increased potential for heat injury and loss of life • Impacts to water quality and watershed health • Impacts to natural resource habitats and other resources, such as agriculture • Loss ofwater for irrigation • Public Health and Air Quality • Significant economic impacts Gobs, sales, tax revenue) • Decline in commercial and residential property values Freeze Vulnerabilities • People • Agriculture - Crop Damage and Livestock • Water Distribution Systems • Power Failure Prolonged freezing temperatures can damage or destroy crops, affecting the economy and agricultural jobs in Merced County. Water infrastructure is also at risk from freezing, including line breaks and frozen valve gates affecting the distribution system. The county and municipal governments wrap pipes before freezing temperature events to help prevent damage. Summary ofPotential Impacts The overall potential impacts from drought include: • Increased potential for injury and loss oflife August 2014 Final Page 68 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan • Significant economic impacts (jobs, sales, tax revenue) • Crop Damage Wildfire Vulnerabilities • Homes in the Wildland/Urban Interface • Water, Gas and Sewer Lines • Power Distribution Systems • Critical Facilities • People with Disabilities, the Elderly and Access and Functional Needs • Agricultural Buildings • Livestock • Crops Vulnerability to wildfire is predominantly associated with wildland-urban interface (WUI) areas. The WUI is a general term that applies to development interspersed or adjacent to forests and wild-lands. WUI areas are a major focus ofthe California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection's (Cal FIRE) fire management strategy. In Merced County, WUI areas occur primarily in the southwestern part ofthe county near Los Banos. Much ofthe area with the highest fire hazard is isolated with few urban settlements. There is also limited exposure to wildfire in the grass lands. When considering the planning area as a whole, limited fuel loading, along with the geographical and topographical features ofthe area, limit the potential for fires resulting in loss oflife and property. However, any fire has the potential to quickly become a large, out-of-control fire, particularly when combined with natural weather conditions common to the area, which include periods ofdrought, high temperatures, and low relative humidity. With California's extensive urban Wildland-Urban Interface situation, the list ofcommunities extends beyond justthose adjacent to Federal lands. Cal FIRE generated a list ofcommunities at risk for wildfire as required by the National Fire Plan. The National Fire Plan is a cooperative, long-term effort between various government agency partners with the intent ofactively responding to severe wildland fires and their impacts to communities while ensuring sufficient firefighting capacity for the future. Three main factors were used to determine wildfire threat in the wildland-urban interface areas ofCalifornia. These include ranking fuel hazards, assessing the probability of wildfire, and defining areas of suitable housing density that could create WUI fire protection strategy situations. There are 4 communities currently on the Communities at Risk List. The central part ofMerced County is in a Local Responsibility Area (LRA), protected by the Merced County Fire Department. Most ofthe area to the west of Interstate 5 and the far eastern part ofthe county are in the Cal FIRE State Responsibility Areas (SRA) for fire protection. The Merced National Wildlife Refuge falls under the responsibility ofthe U.S. Department ofFish and Wildlife, which falls under the Federal Responsibility Area (FRA). Merced County is in Cal FIRE's Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit. Most fire starts in the LRA in the Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit are related to equipment use and arson (The Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Pre-Fire Management Plan). Estimating Potential Losses August 2014 Final Page 69 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan In Merced County there are approximately 69,000 structures with an approximately value of $12.9 million and in unincorporated areas in the county are there 31,256 structures with an approximately value of$3.9 million located in very high fire threat areas. Summary ofPotential Impacts The overall potential impacts from wildfire include: • Potential for injury and loss oflife • Commercial and residential structural damage • Impacts to water quality and watershed health • Impacts to natural resource habitats and other resources, such as agriculture • Loss ofwater, power, roads, phones, and transportation • Public Health and Air Quality • Significant economic impacts (jobs, sales, tax revenue) with the loss of commercial structures • Decline in commercial and residential propertyvalues. Large, past burn areas are located in high fire threat areas mapped along the west side of Interstate 5. Although there are not significant timber resources in Merced County, wildfires can destroy crops affecting the economy. Element 8.4. Repetitive Loss and Severe Repetitive Loss Properties §201.6(cJ(2J(ii): (The risk assessment shall include aJ description ofthe jurisdiction's vulnerability to the hazards described in paragraph (c)(2)(i) ofthis section. This description shall include an overall summary ofeach hazard and its impact on the cammunity. All plans appraved after October 1, 2008 must also address NFlP insured structures that have been repetitively damaged byflOOds. According to the Merced County Planning Agency and the California Repetitive Loss Communities Summary (2010), there are no repetitive loss properties in Merced County. The NFIP defines a repetitive loss structure as "any building with two or more flood losses greater than $1,000 in any 10-year period since 1978." Although this seems an encouraging statistic, it actually may reflect a lack of flood insurance policies in areas that have repetitive floods. August2014 Final Page 70 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan ELEMENT C: MITIGATION STRATEGY Requirement §201.6(c)(3): (The plan shall include the fallowing:) A mitigation strategy that provides thejurisdiction's blueprintfor reducing the potentiallasses identified in the risk assessment, based an existing authorities, policies, programs, and resources, and its ability to expand on and improve these existing tools. Specific mitigation objectives and action items were developed for Merced County in conjunction with the public meetings held in the locations, as cited in the documentation ofthe Planning Process as described in Element A. The list ofaction items identifies mitigation projects and includes a project ranking based upon time horizon, cost, and risk, benefit and input from local stakeholders. The action items were developed to provide public policy makers with a list of potential implementation as mitigation resources; time, equipment and funding become available for the selected projects. Element C.l Existing Authorities, Policies, Programs and Resources Requirement §201.6(c)(3): [The plan shall include the following:} A mitigation strategy that provides the jurisdiction's blueprint for reducing the potentiallosses identified in the risk assessment, based on existing authorities, policies, programs, and resources, and its ability to expand on and improve these existing tools. Merced County and the cities ofAtwater, Livingston and Los Banos have an Emergency Operations Plan, a General Plan, which includes a Health and Safety Element, an Emergency Services Ordinance that clearly defines roles and responsibilities in accordance with state and federal guidelines. The Fire Chief serves as the Director ofEmergency Services by law and ordinance and the Board of Supervisors/City Councils serve as the administering agency and the promulgation authority for all plans, policies and procedures within Merced County and the cities previously mentioned. The County recognizes the 2010 and 2013 Hazard Mitigation Plans ofthe State of California, the California Emergency Services Act, and the appropriate Federal Regulations including 44 CFR 201. Merced County is subject to the State ofCalifornia Uniformed Building Code (UBC), which dictates standards on all current and future construction within Merced County. Element C.2 Participation in the NFIP §201.6(c)(3)(ii): [The hazard mitigation strategy shall include a} section that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range ofspecific mitigatian actions and projects being considered to reduce the effects ofeach hazard, with particular emphasis on new and existing buildings and infrastructure. All plans approved by FEMA after October 1,2008, must also address thejurisdiction's participation in the NFIP, and continued compliance with NFIP requirements, as appropriate. The County has worked with FEMA in broad areas ofthe NFIP such as working with FEMA to revise floodplain identification; working with local governments to manage development in the floodplain; and, as part ofthe Emergency Management and NFIP public education process, the encouragement ofresidents to purchase flood insurance. Merced County OES has assisted in public education programs to encourage all residents ofthe basin area to purchase flood insurance under the NFIP program as part oftheir personal preparedness programs. In 2010, FEMA completed their Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) conversion and updated a number of flood zone areas using 2005 levee certification criteria. In 2007, the California Department ofWater Resources completed their Awareness Floodplain Mapping of Merced County to identif'y all pertinent flood hazard areas that are not mapped under FEMA's August2014 Final Page 71 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan program, which provides an additional resource for identif'ying special flood hazard areas within the County. The map on the following page displays flood zones based upon FEMA's DFIRM (2008) and California Department ofWater Resources' Awareness Floodplain Map (2007). Merced County maintains a floodplain management program based on these maps, and implemented through the County's Special Flood Hazard Areas Ordinance (Title 18 Zoning, Chapter 18.34 ofthe Merced County Code). The purpose ofthis ordinance is to prevent development in FEMA designated flood prone areas, or to ensure that development in those areas can avoid or withstand flooding without increasing flood risk elsewhere. Flood prevention and control in community districts and urban fringe areas are most effectively deterred by structural means such as curbs, gutters and storm drainage systems. In more rural and less developed agriculture and open space areas, more passive measures are relied upon such as high crowns on roadway pavement to divert floodwaters onto adjacent properties that are more suited to accommodate the diverted drainage. Atwater 08/02/1995 12/02/2008 No Special Flood Hazard Dos Palos 08/02/1995 Area NSFHA Livingston 08/02/1995 12/02/2008 No Special Flood Hazard Los Banos 08/02/1995 Area NSFHA Merced County 01/03/1979 12/02/2008 Source: NFIP Community Status Book, 2012 Merced County together with the cities ofAtwater, Livingston and Los Banos continue to comply with the NFIP requirements and maintain current adopted and enforced floodplain management standards. The jurisdictions will continue regulation ofnew construction in special flood hazard areas. This has been accomplished through the planning and permit process and the refining of floodplain mapping with FEMA. This partnership with FEMA has resulted in better identification offloodplain areas and floodplain management activities. August 2014 Final Page 72 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 1 IFEMA'Flood Mat! MEfj.CEM Cilylimit COUNTY I Collllty Conmunity - "0 .." 500 yur 1 '1_ U""'~i",' _ Olllside Flood PlIIin !_lak" o 2.5 5 10 I~ :Ill _.__ -- e._~~"~,_;,:,:=,:",,--" __,, Mi.. Source: FEMA's DFIRM Floodplain Maps Element C.3 Mitigation Goals §201.6(c)(3)(i) [The hazardmitigation strategy shall include oj description ofmitigation goals to reduce or avoid long-term vulnerabilities to the identified hazards. The Planning Team developed goals and objectives to provide direction for reducing hazard related losses in Merced County. These were based upon the results ofthe risk assessment and a review of community goals from other state and local plans. The Planning Team reviewed goals from the following plans to ensure their mitigation strategy was integrated with existing plans and policies: • State ofCalifornia Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2010 and 2013 • California Fire Plan, 2010 • Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Pre-Fire Management Plan, 2005 • Merced County Emergency Operations Plan, 2008 • Merced County General Plan, 2010 Through a brainstorming process at their third meeting, the Planning Team identified a variety of possible goals and then came to a consensus on three main sets ofgoals and objectives. Following August2014 Final Page 73 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan the development ofgoals, the Planning Team identified specific objectives to achieve each goal. Goals and objectives are listed below, but are not prioritized: Goal 1: Minimize the possibility ofloss oflife, injury or damage to property from impacts ofnatural hazards to life, property, and the environment. • Promote education and awareness about natural hazards risk, mitigation, and preparedness to citizens, public agencies, elected officials, nonprofit organizations, and businesses. • Assist vulnerable populations from the impacts ofsevere weather by organizing a mechanism for outreach. • Encourage the use ofdrought tolerant or xeriscaping practices into landscape ordinances. • Ensure protection and enhancement of key emergency access routes. • Protect critical facilities and infrastructure to minimize loss of critical services. • Minimize growth and development in hazard areas. • Adopt and enforce building codes. • Incorporate flood mitigation into local planning by adoption of post disaster recovery ordinance based on a plan to regulate repair activity. • Continue to improve enforcement ofexisting standards and regulations. Goal2: Minimize impacts ofnatural disasters to agriculture and the economies of communities. • Encourage water conservation measures among urban, rural, and agricultural users. • Increase water storage to mitigate flooding and drought. • Develop water saving education program. • Develop plans for post-disaster recovery. • Strengthen disaster resistance and resiliency ofmajor employers. Goal3: Implement identified mitigation activities • Promote hazard mitigation as integrated policy among communities in the county and with the region and state. • Increase communication regarding hazard mitigation among communities in the county. • Educate property owners by increasing wildfire awareness and measures for reducing risks. • Seek funding sources and partners for future mitigation activities. • Improve organizational capabilities to address health and safety issues in mitigation and response. Element C.4 Mitigation Actions and Projects §201.6(c)(3)(ii): [The hazard mitigation strategy shall include aJ section that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range ofspecific mitigation actions and projects being considered to reduce the effects ofeach hazard, with particulor emphasis on new and existing buildings and infrastructure. All pIons approved by FEMA after October 1, 2008, must also address thejurisdiction's participation in the NFIP, and continued compliance with NFIP requirements, as appropriate. §201.6(c)(3)(iv): For multi-jurisdictional plans, there must be identifiable action items specific to the jurisdiction requesting FEMA approval or credit ofthe plan. The Planning Team developed 11 mitigation actions, which are listed below. At their meeting, the Planning Team came to consensus on the person and department responsible for completing a mitigation action worksheet for the countyjparticipating jurisdictions for each identified mitigation action. The worksheet includes information on the background issues, possible August2014 Final Page 74 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan alternatives, responsible office, cost estimate, benefits, potential funding, and ideas for implementation for each action. Full descriptions of each mitigation action for this 2014 MHMP are provided in each jurisdictional annex and a summary is provided below. Countywide Public Education Earthquake X Program - Enhance Public Flooding Awareness of Natural Hazards Severe Weather and Erner enc Pre aredness Wildfire Integrate Local Hazard 1,2,3 Earthquake X X X X Mitigation Plan into Safety Flooding Element of General Plan Severe Weather Wildfire Enforcement of Building 1,3 Earthquake X X X X Codes Non~structural Earthquake 1,2,3 Earthquake X X X X Mitigation Outreach Countywide Inventory for 1,3 Earthquake X X X X URM Buildings - Flood Insurance Promotion, CRS Program 1m lementation Partici ation Identify and evaluate 1,2,3 Flood X effectiveness ofalternative detention basin flood control projects that will reduce flood flows in Black Rascal Creek at the diversion. Countywide Hazard Specific 1,2,3 Flood X X X X Flood Annex Promote Water Conservation 1,2,3 Severe Weather X X X X Program Winter Weather Preparedness 1,2,3 Severe Weather X X X X Campaign Implement and Monitor Weed 1,2,3 Wildfire X Abatement Program August2014 Final Page 75 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Element C.5 Mitigation Strategy Action Plan §201.6(c}(3)(iii) (The hazard mitigation strategy sholl include on] action plan, describing how the action identified in paragraph (c}(3)(ii) ofthis section will be prioritized, implemented, and administered by the localjurisdiction. Prioritization sholl include a special emphasis on the extent to which benefits are maximized according to a cost benefit review ofthe proposed projects and their associated costs. §201.6(c}(3}(iv) For multi-jurisdictional plans, there must be identifiable action items specific to thejurisdiction requesting FEMA approval or credit ofthe plan. The Planning Team analyzed a list ofpotential structural and nonstructural mitigation alternatives identified based upon the risk assessment, existing capabilities, and identified goals and objectives. Each committee member was provided with the STAPLEE prioritization criteria recommended by FEMA. STAPLEE stands for: social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic, and environmental, which are the factors that should be considered when assessing mitigation measures. Through a collaborative group process, the Planning Team used STAPLEE to identify the specific mitigation actions from among the alternatives that are most likely to be implemented and effective. This process ofidentification and analysis of mitigation alternatives allowed the Planning Team to come to consensus and to prioritize recommended mitigation actions. The Disaster Mitigation Act regulations state that benefit-cost review is the primary method by which mitigation projects should be prioritized. In the state ranking, benefit cost review is one often criteria, and although the overall priority ofthe criteria is not stated, benefit-cost review is listed last. Recognizing the federal regulatory requirement to prioritize by benefit-cost and the need for any publicly funded project to be cost-effective, the Planning Team decided to pursue implementation according to when and where damages occur, available funding, political will, jurisdictional priority, and priorities identified in the California State Hazard Mitigation Plan. Cost effectiveness will be considered in additional detail when seeking FEMA mitigation grant funding for eligible projects identified in this plan. Element C.6 Project Implementation §201.6(c}(4)(ii): (The plan sholl include a] process by which local governments incorporate the requirements ofthe mitigation plan into other planning mechanisms such as comprehensive or capitol improvements, when appropriate. The Merced County Office of Emergency Services will be the central coordination point for maintaining this plan and will serve as a lead staff for grant project applications on the countywide projects selected for application under the PDM grant program. Additionally, each jurisdiction applying for grant funds on their own will serve as lead staff for project implementation with assistance from the County and participating Planning Team members as requested. An important implementation mechanism that is highly effective and low-cost is incorporation of the hazard mitigation plan recommendations and their underlying principles into other county and city plans and mechanisms. Where possible, plan participants will use existing plans and/or programs to implement hazard mitigation actions. Mitigation is most successful when it is incorporated into the day-to-day functions and priorities of government and development. As described in this plan's capability assessment, the County and participating jurisdictions already implement policies and programs to reduce losses to life and property from hazards. This plan builds upon the momentum developed through previous and related planning efforts and mitigation programs and recommends implementing actions, where possible, through these other program mechanisms. These existing mechanisms include: August2014 Final Page 76 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan • County and City General and Master plans • County and City Emergency Operations plans • County and City ordinances • Flood/storm water management/master plans • Community Wildfire Protection plans • Capital improvement plans and budgets • Other plans and policies outlined in the capability assessments in the jurisdictional annexes • Other plans, regulations, and practices with a mitigation focus Planning Team members involved in these other planning mechanisms will be responsible for integrating the findings and recommendations of this plan with these other plans, programs, etc., as appropriate. Implementation and incorporation into existing planning mechanisms will be done through the routine actions of: • Monitoring other planning/program agendas • Attending other planning/program meetings • Participating in other planning processes • Monitoring community budget meetings for other community program opportunities The successful implementation of this mitigation strategy will require constant and vigilant review of existing plans and programs for coordination and multi-objective opportunities that promote a safe, sustainable community. A few examples of incorporation of the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan into existing planning mechanisms include: 1) As recommended by Assembly Bill 2140, each community should adopt (by reference or incorporation) this MHMP into the Safety Element of their General Plans. Evidence of adoption (by formal, certified resolution) shall be provided to Cal OES and FEMA 2) Integration of flood actions identified in this mitigation strategy with the actions and implementation priorities established in existing Flood Management Programs 3) Using the risk assessment information to update the hazards section in the County and Cities Emergency Operations Plans Efforts will continuously be made to monitor the progress of mitigation actions implemented through these other planning mechanisms and where appropriate, their priority actions should be incorporated into updates ofthis hazard mitigation plan. August2014 Final Page 77 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan ELEMENT D: PLAN REVIEW, EVALUATION AND IMPLEMENTATION §201.6(d)(3): A local jUrisdiction must review and revise its plan to reflect changes in development, progress in local mitigation efforts, and changes in priorities, and resubmit iffor approval within 5 years in order to continue to be eligible far mitigation project grantfunding. Element 0.1 Changes in Development §201.6(d)(3): A local jurisdiction must review and revise its plan to reflect changes in development, progress in local mitigation efforts, and changes in priorities, and resubmit iffor approval within 5 years in order to continue to be eligible for mitigation project grant funding. Not applicable, this is the first Multi-jurisdictional local Hazard mitigation Plan in Merced County. This section will be addressed in the 5 -year update. Element 0.2 Progress in Local Mitigation Efforts §201.6(d)(3): A local jurisdiction must review and revise its plan to reflect changes in development, progress in local mitigation efforts, andchanges in priorities, and resubmit iffor appraval within 5 years in order to continue to be eligible for mitigation project grantfunding. Not applicable, this is the first Multi-jurisdictional local Hazard mitigation Plan in Merced County. This section will be addressed in the 5 -year update. Element 0.3 Changes in Priorities §201.6(d)(3): A localjurisdiction must review and revise its plan to reflect changes in development, progress in local mitigation efforts, and changes in priorities, and resubmit iffor approval within 5 years in order to continue to be eligible for mitigation project grantfunding. Not applicable, this is the first Multi-jurisdictional local Hazard mitigation Plan in Merced County. This section will be addressed in the 5 -year update. AUIJust 2014 Final Page 78 Merced County OperationalArea Local Hazard Mitigation Plan ELEMENT E: PLAN ADOPTION Requirement §201.6(c)(5): (The plan shall include...] Documentotion that the pion hos been formolly adopted bythe governing bodyofthe jurisdiction requesting approval ofthe plan (e.g., City Council, County commissioner, Tribal Council). Element E.1 Formal Adoption Documentation Requirement §201.6(c)(5): [The plan shall include...] Documentation that the plan has been formally adopted by the governing bodyofthejurisdiction requesting approval ofthe plan (e.g., City Council, County commissioner, Tribal Council). Merced County and the cities plan to submit this plan to the Merced County Board ofSupervisors (BOS) and their respective City Councils upon successful completion ofState and federal review. Merced County wishes to receive approval pending adoption in order to minimize cost to the County. The plan will be submitted to the Board as a regularly scheduled agenda item with room for additional public and departmental comment. Our approach to this final element is due to the need to remain cost effective in the planning process. By receiving state and federal approval of the plan prior to going to the board, we are able to go to the board on a single date to finalize promulgation ofthis document. The plan will be in its final format, notification ofthe public will only have to be done once and copies ofthe resolution adopting this plan, the relevant section of the minutes ofthe BOS meeting and roster ofattendees ofthis meeting will be included in Planning Process Documentation section ofthis plan. The resolution will be inserted before the table ofcontents. As part ofthe agenda report the basic requirements for the plan, the scope of the document and the need to revise every five years will be clearly stated. The Merced County OES staffwill be prepared to give an overview ofthe plan and be prepared to answer any questions related to the document development process and its contents. Element E.2 Merced County Operational Area Hazard Mitigation Plan This plan is for Merced County, Unincorporated County, and its incorporated cities ofAtwater, Livingston and Los Banos. Therefore there is one (1) required resolution from the Merced County Board of Supervisors and three (3) required resolutions from the City Councils. August2014 Final Page 79 Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan REFERENCES State ofCalifornia Hazard Mitigation Plan (2013) Merced County 2035 General Plan (2010) Merced County 2035 General Plan, Health and Safety Element (2010) Merced County Emergency Operations Plan (2008) Merced County Flood Management Ordinance Merced County Merced County Code ofOrdinances Merced County website Merced County Economic Development Corporation Reports (2010, 2011, and 2012) Merced County Agricultural Commissioner's Report, 2011 Department of Finance Data, Merced County 2012 Origins and Development: A Chronology of Disasters in California, California Governor's Office of Emergency Services City-Data.com National Flood Insurance Program, Community Status Book, 2012 Flood Insurance Study, Merced County - FEMA, 2010 California Department ofWater Resources, 2006, "Drought Preparedness." Federal Emergency Management Agency, Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide, 2011 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance under the Disaster Mitigation Act of2000 Federal Emergency Management Agency, How to Guide #1, Getting Starting: Building Support for Mitigation Planning Federal Emergency Management Agency, How-To Guide #2, Understanding Your Risks: Identifying Hazards and Estimating Losses Federal Emergency Management Agency, How-To Guide #3, Developing the Mitigation Plan: Identifying Mitigation Actions and Implementation Strategies Federal Emergency Management Agency, How-To Guide #4, Bringing the Plan to Life: Implementing the Hazard Mitigation Plan August 2014 Final PageBO Merced County Operational Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Federal Emergency Management Agency, How-To Guide #5, Using Benefit-Cost Review in Mitigation Planning Federal Emergency Management Agency, How-To Guide #6, Integrating Historic Property and Cultural Resource Considerations into Hazard Mitigation Planning Federal Emergency Management Agency, How-To Guide #7, Integrating Manmade Hazards into Mitigation Planning Federal Emergency Management Agency, How-To Guide #8, Multi-Jurisdictional Mitigation Planning Federal Emergency Management Agency, How-To Guide #9, Using the Hazard Mitigation Plan to Prepare Successful Mitigation Projects California Emergency Management Agency, Disaster Recovery and Mitigation Handbook California Emergency Management Agency, Tools for Preparing your LHMP, 2012 Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Energy Assistance Act, Section 322 2010 U. S. Census California Department ofWater Resources, Water Conditions and Drought Report to Governor, 2009 United States Geological Survey website National Weather Service website Spatial Hazards Events and Losses Database ofthe United States website California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection website National Register ofHistoric Places Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Pre-Fire Management Plan, 2005 California Fire Plan, 2010 Nation Climate Data Center website August2014 Final Page 81 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information CITY OF LOS BANOS Community Prome The City of Los Banos in Merced County is situated 12 miles southwest ofthe City of Merced, the county seat. Los Banos is one ofthe larger cities in the County ofMerced and is located in the heart ofthe San Joaquin Valley, 70 miles northwest of Fresno. Los Banos is located in the center of California, about two hours from the cities of San Francisco, Oakland, Sacramento and Yosemite National Park. Monterey and San jose are accessible in one and a half hours and within one hour ofSan joaquin's Valley's major cities ofStockton and Fresno. The City is located in the western portion ofthe County west of Highway 165 and just north of Highway 152. Some have called Los Banos "The Crossroads" because State Highways 33, 152, and 165 pass through the city; Interstate 5 skirts its western boundaries and it's an easy 30 minute drive to Highway 99. According to the United States Census Bureau, Los Banos has a total area of 23,000 acres (10.1 square miles) - 98.78% ofit is land and 1.22% is water with an elevation of 118 feet above sea level. The City of Los Banos operates under a City Council/City Manager form ofgovernment. The City Council (4 members) makes laws and sets policies which are enforced and implemented by the City Manager, with the assistance ofsubordinate officers, department heads, and the City Clerk, City Treasurer and City Attorney. Municipal elections are held every two years in November ofeven numbered years with City Council terms overlapping. The Mayor and two Council Members are elected at one election, and the other two Council Members, City Clerk and City Treasurer are elected at the next election. The City of Los Banos provides water, sewer, and storm drainage, as well as police, fire, and general government services. The City of Los Banos has one school district which serves the students ofthe City and surrounding area. The Los Banos Unified School District has eight elementary schools (K-6), five charter schools, three parochial schools, one junior high school, a continuation high school, an adult school, two high school campuses, and a media center. Los Banos has a Community College, and is minutes away from UC Merced. The map on the following pages shows the City of Los Banos Planning Area. History The name "Los Banos" came from a Franciscan monk's missionary trips to the valley from Mission San juan Bautista back in the early 1800·s. On the route from San juan Bautista, Padre Felipe Arroyo de la Cuesta discovered pools ofwater in the rocks at the summit ofthe mountains in a little creek bed that flowed down into the San joaquin Valley. At these baths or pools he camped overnight with his band of friendly Indians from the Mission. Reports of these baths led to the local ranchers naming the creek "El Arroyo de Los Banos del Padre Arroyo." The name ofthose spring baths became "Los Banos Crick." In 1873 a pioneer to the area named Gus Kreyenhagen ran a trading post near Los Banos Creek. The Post Office Department decided to establish a Post Office at the trading post and named it after the creek, hence the name "Los Banos." Henry Miller arrived in San Francisco in 18S0 with $6.00 in his pocket. After working as a butcher he became aware ofthe need for a better grade ofcattle than that which was available at that time in California. He came to the San Joaquin Valley and began his land acquisitions and cattle empire. He acquired land on both sides ofthe San joaquin River ultimately owning that land for a distance of 120 miles. In 1871 he formed the San joaquin and Kings River Canal and Irrigation Company. He is credited with being the first to introduce the crops of cotton, rice and alfalfa to the valley. Agriculture remains the number one industry in and around August2014 Pagel City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information City ofLos Banos PlanningArea Map Vicinity Map China Camp Rd. I ,.Gii ~ Ii • • •e ~ :l1 Merced County " Henry Miller Ave. t .-~ \ ". ; ~pri Ave. Phillips Rd i j 1 ,1\ Sunset Ave. :'Ave.! 'I --- J Pi :1 ! : ~I Caclus Dr. I II : Colton Rd. "'j j Merced• COl/lit)' HOWELL CONSUITIN(, MlIlti-Hazal'd Mitigatioll Plall Print Date: June 4. 2014 Los Banos Planning Area Data Souces: Merced County. Cel EMA ,~ l! "t Source: City ofLos Banos; Planning Team August2014 Page 2 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information Los Banos and this is due mainly to the early success of Henry Miller. He owned over 3.000.000 acres ofland. stretching through Idaho. Oregon, Nevada and California. In Los Banos. Miller brought the railroad to town, constructed a bank. company store and many other building improvements. In addition, he planned and developed housing areas for local citizens and enhanced the quality of life in many ways. Miller created the May Day celebration. which still is observed in Los Banos. as a way ofthanking his employees for their hard work and dedication. By the age of89. when Henry Miller died in 1916. he had given millions ofdollars to numerous worthy causes. Today the City of Los Banos is proud to honor his vision and legacy. Weather The climate in the City of Los Banos cycles through a cool rainy winter season and a dry summer season. Summers are hot and dry and winters are cool and wet, with most ofthe year's rain falling from late December through March. While the higher County elevations receive snow, snowfall is rare at the lower elevations. The annual average precipitation for the City of Los Banos is 9.6 inches with the most precipitation, on average. occurring in January. The warmest month ofthe year on average is July. The highest recorded temperature was 112°F in 2006. On average, the coolest month ofthe year is January. The lowest recorded temperature was 13°F in 2007. Economy The City of Los Banos' vision is to be a family-oriented community that maintains its small-town atmosphere while accommodating growth. Traditionally, the City of Los Banos has attracted agricultural-based industries and has relied on these types ofindustries for employment. Through a collaborative effort ofthe County of Merced, cities ofAtwater. Livingston. Los Banos. Merced. and the Merced County Economic Development Corporation (MCEDCO). an Economic Development Strategic Planning (EDSP) process went underway in July 2002. Each city formed an EDSP Task Force to work with consultants to plan and prepare an Economic Development Strategic Plan for their city. The Economic Development Strategic Plan goals and objectives aligned with the goals and objectives adopted in the City of Los Banos General Plan, 2010. In 2009. over 30 percent of families in Los Banos lived below the poverty level. Los Banos is challenged with an unemployment rate of 17.1 percent. Approximately 67 percent of Los Banos' population is Hispanic with strong connections to farm labor. Today, the most common industries within a five-mile radius ofLos Banos are educational services and health care (a combined average of19.6 percent ofworkers). Many other industries include food. agriculture, forestry. fishing and hunting. construction. accommodation and food services. and public administration. The tables on the following illustrate the most common occupations and unemployment rate. August2014 Page 3 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information Common Occupation and Unemployment Rates M:-;Sl comm.:m mdl1S/flf;S (%! Most commo.1 ,ndusrnes for ma,es (%) Unempic~'meJ"t in .;luI" 201), Here ,,",-;;if"'=j"',,""'H!,~,,""",i~$"'-',o; ~ 5 4<;~ Califo(';;]ial 9 3"!·e. Source: city-data.com Population The total estimated city population in 2012 was 36,747 up 42% from the U.S. Census conducted in 2000. Population estimates forthe City of Los Banos from the 2010 U.S. Census are included in the table below. The racial makeup of Los Banos is 57.95 percent White, 3.76 percent African American, 0.37 percent Native American, 3.23 percent Asian, 0.37 percent Pacific Islander, 28.14 percent from other races, and 5.12 percent from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino ofany race is 64.90 percentaccording to census data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau (2010). Since the 1980s, the city's population has changed with a continuing influx ofpeople who work in the San Jose/Silicon Valley area but seek more affordable housing and slower pace ofsemi-rural life, a pattern seen in many other small towns within commuting distance ofSilicon Valley. Citv ofLos Banos Po ulation, 2010 U.S. Census Hisp~nic Cenms Two African Native Other or or designated Latino Islander races place American American more (ofany races race) Los Banos 35,972 20,846 1,354 512 1,162 134 10,123 1,841 23,346 Source: 2010 U.s. Census HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Although the City of Los 8anos is located in an area where there are few obvious hazards, potential hazards do exist. The main objective ofhazard identification is to document potential hazards that August2014 Page 4 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information must be considered when making decisions on the location, type, and density ofdevelopment. The official Planning Team for the City of Los Banos identified hazards that affect the City and developed hazard profiles based upon the risk assessment, past events and their impacts. Cltv otLos Banos -Hazard Profiles Hazard ProbaiJility of Geograpl1ic: Potential Significance Occurrence Extent Mamitlille Dam Failure Unlikely Catastrophic Catastrophic Low Earthquake Likely Limited Limited Medium Flood Likely Limited Limited Medium Severe Weather Likely Catastrophic Catastrophic High Wildfire Occasional Limited Limited Low Source: Planmng Team Past Events One method to identify hazards is to look at the past events that have triggered federal and/or state disaster declarations that included Merced County and its cities. The following table lists the disaster where Merced County, inclusively, was included in federal and/or state disaster declarations from 19S0 to the present. Many, ifnot all, ofthe past disasters listed for the County of Merced had an impact on the City ofLos Banos. Merced Countv Disaster Declaration RistoIv 19S0-present . Name Disaster State Federal Number Declaration Declaration Flood 1950 Floods OCD50-01 ./ (Statewide) Flood 1955 Floods DR-47 (Statewide) Flood 1969 Storms, DR-253 Floodinl! Freeze 1972 Freeze Flood Winter Storms 1982 DR-677 Freeze 1990 Freeze DR-894 Flood 1995 Late Winter DR-1046 Storms Flood 1997 January Floods DR-1155 Flood 1998 EI Nino Floods DR-1203 Freeze 1998 Freeze DR-1267 Flood 2006 June Storms DR-1646 Drought Central Valley GP 2008- Droul!ht 03 Source: Merced OES, Cal OES and FEMA The majority ofthe declarations were declared for flooding due to severe storms. These events occurred in 1950, 1955, 1969, 1982, 1995, 1997, 1998, and again in 2006. A federal disaster declaration for freeze was declared in 1990 and 1998. The follOWing table lists the emergency declarations that impacted Merced County and is also from 1950 to the present. AUBustZ014 PaBeS City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information Merced County Emergency Declaration History 1950-present Hazard Type Disaster Name Disaster State Federal Number Declaration Declaration Hurricane California Hurricane 3248 Katrina Katrina Evacuees " " Evacuation SeDtember 2005 Drought California Drought 3023 Januarv 1976-77 " " Source: Merced OES, Cal OES and FEMA Earthquakes The City of Los Banos' distance to fault zones in the region, including the Ortigalita, Calaveras, San Andreas and Hayward Faults, places it within 'Maximum Expectable Earthquake Intensity Zone III' where 'High Severity, Most Probable Damage' could result should an earthquake occur in the region. There is no record ofany seismic activity originating within the City; however the Los Banos has been shaken by earthquakes originating elsewhere. There is documented evidence of six earthquakes that shook the area, those of1872, 1906, 1952, 1966, 1984, and 1989. Major damage occurred in Los Banos in 1906, with minor damage recorded throughout the county from other occurrences. No damaging earthquakes greater than M6.0 have been recorded in the City of Los Banos or Merced County in over 200 years, though several have been very close. The most recent large earthquake near Merced County, and the City of Los Banos, was 16 miles east north-east of King City at a magnitude of5.3 on October 20, 2012. Several aftershocks followed the main earthquake, including a M3.1 aftershock. This quake was preceded by two earthquakes located approximately 100 miles from Merced County, the 1982 New Idria earthquake (M5.4) and the 1983 Coalinga quake (M6.5). There was low level ground shaking and low local magnitude reported. Based on the earthquake shaking potential mapped for the City of Los Banos, the proximity to the San Andreas Fault and the history ofshaking but no surface rupture, the probability ofdamaging seismic ground shaking in the City ofLos Banos is considered as likely. Other hazards associated with earthquake activity, such as lateral spreading, surface cracking or differential setting. are considered unlikely to occur, although no studies have been conducted to determine the likelihood ofthese hazards. August2014 Page 6 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information Regional Earthquake Faults Slm Luj~ RO('n'o.~' .'f:l~~~ FiguU 7-1 Regional Faults --huh,; c=::::J 11= bt,.~", A.= ~1""b1>"'I'lIn:>"",,,... ~ ~~ -..".---..-., ~ ... Source: City ofLos Banos General Plan Subsidence and Erosion The Merced County General Plan Safety Element has identified Los Banos as lying within a general area prone to ground subsidence. According to historical records, soils in Los Banos area subsided up to four feet between 1920s and 1983. The presence ofa subsidence trough in a long, narrow area between Los Banos and Kettleman City has also caused subsidence in the past. The primary cause ofthis is groundwater extraction without adequate replenishment. Subsidence in Los Banos has been recognized as a geologic hazard. Much of the Planning Area contains soil with high erosion susceptibility. Two-thirds of the Planning Area is considered to have either moderate or high erosion potential. The risk oferosion is greatly increased during grading and construction activities when soils are loosened and bare of vegetation. The planned construction ofthe SR-152 Bypass, in particular, is a major concern as construction activity will ring the northern portion ofthe city. Erosion control measures will need to be implemented to prevent downstream sedimentation and surface water degradation. August2014 Page 7 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information Erosion Hazards in the City ofLos Banos ~ "E ~~ ~ -, H ~ J: , ;- - " ,. - [W "t g ~l!l! ~ i 1~ ] !I1l!1(! .I~ E8 Sonrce: City ofLos Banos General Plan, Safety Element August2014 Page 8 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information Flood The primary types of flood events in Merced County that may impact the City ofLos Banos are riverine and urban. Flooding could also occur as a result of dam failure, however, there is no evidence to indicate that flooding due to dam failure is likely. Regardless ofthe type of flood, the cause is often the result of severe weather and excessive rainfall, either in the flood area, upstream, or from winter snowmelt. Failed dams can create floods that are catastrophic to life and property as a result of the tremendous energy ofthe released water. A catastrophic dam failure could easily overwhelm local response capabilities and require mass evacuations to save lives. The floodplain ofthe Merced River is well defined from the eastern county boundary to approximately 10 miles above the mouth of the river. Downstream ofthis point, the floodplain is undifferentiated from the valley floor and major floods can spread out over large areas. During the 1950 flood event, approximately 19,600 acres ofland along the Merced River were inundated, including the towns of Snelling and Merced Falls. Alarge portion of Merced County continues to be subject to inundation during flood events, as approximately 380,010 acres have been determined to be in the FEMA floodplain. The physical risks associated with potential flooding and the regulatory requirements for floodplain management are important considerations when decisions are being made regarding future land use throughout the City of Los Banos. Between 1992 and 2002, every county in California was declared a federal disaster area at least once for a flooding event. California has a chronic and destructive flood history. Half ofthe 72 federally declared disasters in California between 1950 and 2000 were flood related. Historically, floods have been the most frequent cause ofdisaster in Merced County and its cities. Significant flooding occurs in Merced County and its cities approximately every five years. Merced County was declared a disaster area by the federal government eight times between 1955 and 2012. FEMA's Flood Insurance Study listed flooding events in 1937-38, 1950, 1955, 1969, 1983, 1997, 1998, and 2006. Critical flood events in Merced County would cover at least 35 to 50 percent ofthe county. Most of Los Banos lies outside the 100-year floodplain designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Several smaller areas in the southeastern portion ofthe city limits fall short ofbeing in the 100-year floodplain as well as some small areas to the north of the city limits. The City of Los Banos participates in the National Flood Program; however, the FEMA Flood Insurance Study (Number 06047CVOOOC) reports 'Merced County includes the Cities of Dos Palos and Los Banos, which do not contain any Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) and are non-flood prone: The following page reflects the flood potential impact areas around the City of Los Banos based on the 100-year floodplain. Available history, data, and surveys by FEMA, indicates the City of Los Banos is not in the floodplain and would rarely have the hazard potential for future flooding. Los Banos Creek Los Banos Creek is the predominant natural drainage feature in the region. It runs in a north-south direction and is located at the western part of the city. Flooding occurred in Los Banos on occasion due to rainfall runoff from the Los Banos Creek watershed until the construction ofa Los Banos Creek Detention Reservoir (LBCDR) in the 1960s. The LBCDR controls flood water upstream with intermittent flood-flow release at 1,000 CFS, and has been successful in keeping the Creek regulated. The Grasslands Water District (GWD) regulates Creek flow downstream and diverts part of the creek for wetlands water supply purposes. August2014 Page 9 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information City ofLos Banos 100year Flood Hazard Vicinity Map los Banos China Camp Rd. 8' j I I 11 ~ I ii "capr~ i ,I ~""""_"""~·"'._.r_.._ I I PhillIps T f I I f il Sunset Ave. Cope de Oro ,Ave.: .. i-i-j -, ...,,'''' --.... _. ! , "g i ~ , Cactus Dr. i Colton Rd. ! HOWELL :Merced COU/l(V CONSUlTING Multi-HazaNI Mitigatioll Plan Print Dote: June 6. 2014 Dola Souces: M"rced County, enl EtdA Los Banos Flood Hazard Source: Merced County, Cal OES, FEMA August2014 Page 10 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information Stormwater The city's rapid growth in recent years means that natural stormwater catchment areas are quickly replaced by homes and other developments. In view ofthe potential damage flooding can cause, the timely disposal of surface runoff into drainage detention basins and water conveyance systems is ofutmost importance. In Los Banos, storm water runoff is discharged through a combination of natural and man-made drainage structures including creeks, waterways and irrigation channels. Mud Slough Mud Slough is a tributary ofthe original Los Banos Creek channel and runs in a northwesterly direction east ofthe city. Over the last 30 years, peak level flows in the Mud Slough drainage area has been successfully controlled through a succession of projects by the GWD. The flow generated in the slough south ofSR-152 is now directed into the Santa Fe Canal and is used as part ofthe GWD's water supply. ccm Main Channel The Central California Irrigation District's Main Channel (CClD) is a major manmade water feature in the Planning Area. This conveyance facility is the main artery for water supply for CCID and has a capacity ofapproXimately 800 CFS. The channel runs approXimately in a southwesterly direction and collects storm water runofffor irrigation purposes. Dam Failure Three dams close to Los Banos have the potential of inundating portions or the whole of Los Banos. Flood zone mapping by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) indicates that all of Los Banos is located within the San Luis Reservoir dam inundation area. Northern portions of Los Banos are also located within the Los Banos Detention Reservoir and the Little Panoche Reservoir Dam inundation area. The map on the following page depicts the probable extent ofinundation ofa dam failure. Los Banos Detention Reservoir is located southwest ofthe City on Los Banos Creek. The reservoir has a capacity of 34,600 acre feet and was constructed in 1965 to protect areas surrounding Los Banos from regular flooding. The dam is 167 feet high and Los Banos Detention Basin provides recreation facilities for picnicking, camping, swimming, fishing, and boating. Little Panoche Detention Dam, completed in 1966, contains a little more than a million yards of earth fill in its 151-foot-high embankment. The dam's crest is 1,440 feet long and has a capacity of 5,580 acre-feet. Both Los Banos and Little Panoche Dams are joint federal/State facilities and are classified as earth fill detention dams. The San Luis Dam was constructed in 1967 to control floodwaters in the San Luis Canal. The dam is 382 feet high and contains 77,656,000 cubic yards ofmaterial. The dam's crest is 30 feet thick. In the United States, only the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Fort Peck and Oahe Dams along the Missouri River Basin carry greater mass. The dam structure is constructed to withstand an earthquake of magnitude 8.3 occurrence. August2014 Page 11 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information All three dams are owned by the Bureau of Reclamation. They are regularly inspected to ascertain their structural integrity. Los Banos EQ Faults with Dam Inundation Areas NpU7.1 Regional Faults: --huh L'>i I0= tm.:> Source: City ofLos Banos General Plan Severe Weather - Drought, Freeze and Extreme Heat Drought Severe weather includes conditions such as drought, freeze and extreme heat. All of these type conditions have impacts on people, property, animals, agriculture, and the environment. The State California has experienced severe drought conditions. The State's available record for determining hydrologic risks is short, only going back about 100 years. Recent droughts affecting Merced County and its cities are summarized below using data from Cal OES and from the County of Merced Agricultural Commissioner's Office. • 1928-1937- drought affected the entire state and is the longest, most severe drought on record with a recurrence interval of greater than 100 years. • 1947-1950-droughtaffected the entire state but was most extreme in Southern California. The drought in winter of 1950 affected the area from the Kern River basin north to the American River basin. The drought caused two deaths and $33 million in damages. • 1976-1977-drought of 1976-1977 was most severe in the northern three-quarters of California, but the impact was experienced statewide because of the dependence of southern California on water transfers from the north. The water year 1977 was the driest year of record at almost all gauging stations in the affected area in California, and the water Augustl014 Page 12 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information year 1976 was among the five driest in the central and northern Sierra Nevada. The two year deficiency in runoff accumulated during the drought is unequalled at gauging stations in the affected area; and this deficiency has a recurrence interval that exceeds 80 years. Crop damages statewide were $2.67 billion. • 1987-1992-California experienced a serious drought due to low precipitation and run-off levels. During this multiyear, multi-county drought, the runoff from the San joaquin Valley was 47 percent ofaverage. [n 1991, the U.S. Department ofAgriculture Economic Research Report Agricultural Outlook reported that the Merced River flow would be inadequate to provide sufficient water for agricultural uses for the fifth consecutive year. A USDA drought disaster declaration was declared. • 2004-2005-on january 15, 2005, the U.S. Department ofAgriculture (USDA) designated 53 ofCalifornia's 58 counties as natural disaster areas due to damages and losses caused by extreme drought. • 2008-2009 - on june 12, 2008, the Governor proclaimed Merced County as a state disaster area due to the Central Valley Drought. • 2012 - in September 2012, the USDA designated Merced County a contiguous disaster area due to drought that occurred since january 1, 2012. • 2014 - in january 2014, the Governor proclaimed a State of Emergency and directed state officials to take all necessary actions to prepare for these drought conditions: to assist farmers and communities that are economically impacted by dry conditions and to ensure the state can respond if Californians face drinking water shortages. The Governor also directed state agencies to use less water and hire more firefighters and initiated an expansive water conservation public awareness campaign. Based on the historical record ofdroughts that have occurred in California and Merced County since 1862 (143 years), the data indicates that California experiences drought conditions on average of every 10 years, which is a 10 percent chance ofoccurring in any given year. [n the City ofLos Banos, as well as within Merced County, based on these probabilities, drought will likely continue to occur in the future. Below is data reported from over 4,000 weather stations relating to the weather conditions for the City of Los Banos. Average Tempereturas Precipitation ::'+ ,., -~~-r'"", :'1 August 2014 Page 13 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information Wind ~peed (mpllj Snowfall Sunshine ~$ '''5'''~''''~ ~~.. .'at" ;: £ V;1r ol,r' V~.. It.;" ,'Ii' "''"4 """P C Freeze The entire county is susceptible to extreme temperatures. Prolonged freezing temperatures can damage or destroy crops, affecting the economy and agricultural jobs in the City ofLos Banos, and throughout Merced County. Water infrastructure is also at risk from freezing, including line breaks and frozen valve gates affecting the distribution system. There have been three state emergency declarations, in 1972, 1990 and 1998 for freezes in Merced County. In 1999 and 2007, a state emergency was declared for severe freeze events that occurred. In 2007, 2009 and 2011 and 2012 the USDA designated Merced County and its cities as a disaster area due to freeze and extreme cold. During these events, California's San Joaquin Valley farming communities were hit with freezing temperatures that severely affected the region's crops and resulted in Presidential disaster declarations. The declarations made federal funds available to supplement unemployment compensation for farm laborers and other farm industry workers put out ofwork as a direct result oflost seasonal crops. In the past, severe freezes have occurred every few years. Damaging freezes are recorded for the last 36 years, which is an average ofonce every five years or a probability of 19 percent in any given year. Therefore, the probability offuture occurrences in the City of Los Banos is likely. Extreme Heat The National Weather Service (NWS) will initiate its Heat Index Program Alert procedures when the high temperature is expected to exceed 1050 to 1100 (depending on local climate) for at least two consecutive days (California SMHP, 2012). The climate in the City of Los Banos and Merced County is hot and arid. and the entire county is susceptible to extreme heat. The agricultural industry is most at risk to extreme temperatures. Hot and cold temperature extremes damage crops, affecting the economy and potentially resulting in lost farming jobs. Field workers are susceptible to heat exhaustion and heat stroke. Elderly residents who may live alone and are limited in their mobility are also vulnerable during heat waves. The highest temperature on record for Merced County is 96.5 at the Los Banos station and 97.1 at the Merced Municipal Airport station. The average high is 90.5 recorded atthe Los Banos station in August2014 Page 14 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information the summerand 94.5 at the Merced Municipal Airport station. On average, there are 88 days over 90°F in the summer recorded at the Los Banos station and 99 days per year over 90°F at the Merced Municipal Airport station. The hottest months are July and August. In the City ofLos Banos, the warmest month ofthe year on average is July. The highest recorded temperature was 112°F in 2006. On average, the coolest month ofthe year is January. The lowest recorded temperature was 13°F in 2007. The 5HELDUS database lists three incidents of extreme heat in Merced County from 1960-2005. These occurred in June 1961, with $14,705 in crop damages reported, in August 1992 and September 1998. No damages are known for the 1992 and 1998 events. During 2005, 2006, 2008, and 2009 Merced County received USDA emergency designations twice for heat waves and again in 2012. Temperatures at or above 95°F are common most summer days throughout Merced County, including the City ofLos Banos and it is highly likely that extreme PercentofTmal Degree ofFire Hazard Acreage Plaoojr!9 Area heat will continue to occur on an annual Unle or No Threat 18,401 S4 basis in the future. Moderate 3,492 16 Wildfires High 3 21,896 100 Weather components, such as Total level oftire hazard severity based on surface fuels analYSIS, California Depart· temperature, relative humidity, wind, and ~nt of For~ and Fire P.rotection, lightning, also affect the potential for Source; Cillifo~nia D~p2lrtment of Forestry and Fi~ Protection wildfire. High temperatures and low relative humidity dry out the fuels that feed the wildfire creating a situation where fuel will more readily ignite and burn more intensely. Both urban and wildland fires conditions exist in Merced County and its cities which increases the chances for damage to property, loss oflife and/or injury. In most of Merced County, the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire) ranks fuel loading as low. Fuels are mainly crops and grasses. In the southwest corner, there are some brush, pine, and grass fuels, which are ranked as moderate fuel hazards, primarily in the area west of Interstate 5. There have not been any state or federal disaster declarations in the City of Los Banos or Merced County related to wildfire in the past. The Planning Team noted that although there are many fire starts, the fuels are "flashy· and fires are usually quickly put out. The table below shows the most recent historic fires mapped by Cal Fire for Merced County and its cities. Recent Wildfire History in Merced County Date Name Of Fire Acres Burned Agency lune 4, 2013 152 Fire 124 Cal Fire Mav 31, 2012 Billv Fire 434 Cal Fire Julv 23, 2011 Romero Fire 489 Cal Fire June 26, 2011 Rest Fire 575 Cal Fire June 11, 2010 Robinson Fire 1,600 Cal Fire June 5, 2010 Childs Fire 462 Cal Fire Source: Cal FIre Redbook August2014 Page 15 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information Fire starts are highly likely during each fire season; though, they rarely result in large-scale wildfires. The table upper right reflects the existing fire hazards in Los Banos. Asset lllvelllt(lry The table that follows lists the critical facilities and other community assets identified by the Planning Team as important to protect in the event ofa disaster. Within the City of Los Banos, the following are considered critical facilities: • Los Banos Fire Department Stations. • Los Banos Police Department building, • Los Banos City Hall. • Water supply lines and wells. • Wastewater treatment plant, pumping stations, and trunk lines. • Major electrical transmission lines and substations. • Major communication lines and microwave transmission facilities. Critical facilities also include major roadways which may serve as principal evacuation routes. The table that follows lists the critical facilities and other community assets identified by the county's Planning Team as important to protect in the event ofa disaster. City ofLos Banos-Critical Facilities and Communiq Assets SlllJ August2014 Page 16 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information Public Facilities aud Services iu the City ofLos Banos _-. • .. , • ~ , s , , .. , , ~ ,? , 1 ITij ~] j ~ I I .0 '0 .~ e ~ , ~ i j 1', " Source: Source: City ofLos Banos General Plan, Safety Element August2014 Page 17 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information City ofLos Banos Historical Sites and Structures Year Historic Landmark Site/Building Location Construded Designation National Register Status Bank of los Banos Building 836 611> Street 1923 listed in NR Bridge #39.2001 Delta Individual property determined 1950 Mendota Canal eligible for National Register Church of St Joseph 1109 K Street 1923 listed in NR Individual property determined Delta Mendota Canal 1946 eligible for National Register 803 E Pacheco Needs to be reevaluated using los Banos SHL 550 Boulevard (:Ufrent standards Needs to be reevaluated using los Banos Creek SPHl002 current standards Miller and lux Ranch Head Needs to be reevaluated using East of los Banos 1879 SHL 548 quarters current !otandards Individual property determined Nes Canal 1896 eligible for National Register Pacheco Pass W SR-IS2 SHL829 listed in CR 20 I80 S Mercey Individual property determined Pagundas Barn 1926 Springs Road eligible for National Register Individual property determined San Joaquin and Kings Canal 1871 eligible for National Register San Luis Gonzaga Archaeo listed in NR logical District 637 Pacheco Individual property determined SR-IS2 Highway eligible for National Register NR - National Register SHL - State Historic landmark CR - California Register SPHI - State Point of Historic Interest Source: Directory ofPropertles In me Historic Property Data File for Merced Counry. OffICe o(Hisloric Preservation. Source: City ofLos Banos 2030 General Plan Estimating Potential Losses The table below shows the maximum population and building exposure in the City of Los Banos. GIS data was used to quantify the number and value of structures in the 100 & SOO-year flood hazard areas and in high wildfire hazard areas. Total Exposure - City ofLos Banos Exposed Los Banos Population Number Land Value Structure Valli" Total Vallie Total 37,168 12,210 $348,357,294 $1,421,528,737 $1,769.886,031 Exvosure Flood: lOO-yr 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Flood: 500-yr 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Wildfire: High (Threat 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Areal Source: City ofLos Banos GIS, Tax Assessor, Planning Team August 2014 Page 18 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information i'utmre Development Trends Los Banos has long been recognized for its friendly small-town atmosphere, which is a valued characteristic that is desirable to maintain. In order to maintain a sustainable community, it must find a way to attract a variety ofindustries, local and region serving commercial development, and provide housing opportunities that will appeal to all demographic categories ranging from university students and faculty to retirees and young families. In order to achieve these objectives, the General Plan focuses on a number of basic themes that are reflected in goals and policies. The goals of the City ofLos Banos, as stated in the General Plan, include the following: • Providing for balanced and sustainable growth; • Creating new jobs to develop the local economy; • Integrating neighborhoods and neighborhood centers; • Creating a network ofparks and open space; • Creating a safe, efficient, and attractive circulation system; • Providing ample retail and shopping opportunities; and, • Planning for environmental justice. Land use designations applied in these growth areas were designed to accommodate a variety of employment generating uses, small- and large-scale commercial development, and provide a broad range ofhousing opportunities for existing and future residents. Following the adoption ofthe General Plan, a population projection was prepared by the Merced County Association ofGovernments (MCAG). MCAG projections cover the entire 20-year General Plan period. The projections for Los Banos were augmented by growth rates used in the Environmental Impact Report for the University ofCalifornia Site Selection, to account for the anticipated population increase generated by UC Merced, located at Lake Yosemite north of Merced. Based on MCAG's projections, the City of Los Banos was expected to grow from its 1998 Department of Finance (DOF) estimated population of 21,992 to a population of 42,523 in 2020. The follOWing table summarizes the land uses at build-out of the General Plan. The General Plan provides the opportunity for up to 17,000 additional residents in areas at build-out. There are plans for new jobs in commercial retail, commercial services, light industrial, manufacturing, public services, and other employment uses as well. Build-out estimates are not official growth projections and do not represent City policy. Actual population, square footage, or number ofdwelling units could be lower or higher than these estimates based on a number offactors. Buildout may vary overall or within individual land use designations due to: • The need to preserve the agricultural base, grazing lands, and other types of open space; • Infrastructure availability, including transportation facilities, public services, and facilities; • The need to limit development due to flood risk, fire risk, geologic and soils constraints, presence of habitat and biological resources, and presence ofother important natural resources; and • Other factors, as described in the General Plan, community plans, specific plans, and City codes and ordinances. The City has developed estimates ofaverage density and intensity to use in calculating 2020 August2014 Page 19 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information General Plan buildout land use. The City has based buildout estimates on past recorded development activity, recent development plan submittals, regional and statewide population and employment growth forecasts, and other factors. Below is a table that demonstrates the number of land use acres at total build out: Acres at Buildout Land USjl Total Buildout Percent ofToral Residential 4,270 12 Low Deruilty Residential 3,610 11 Medium Density ReSidential 590 2 High Density Residential 10 d Mixed USe 180 Mixed Use 10 d N£>fghborhood CommerCIal 170 " CommerejallOffice Professional 2,610 7 Commercia! 760 2 Office Professional 520 Employment Park 820 2 Industrial 510 1 Others 10,370 30 Agriculture/Rural 7,820 22 Parks, Trails & Open Space 1,320 4 Ovic/lnstitutlOnal 490 5R·152 Bypass 750 2 Tota! 34,810 100.0 Source: General Plan, Land Use City ofLos Banos Goals for Future • Create a strong leadership and collaborative network that is engaged and committed to attaining the City's vision for economic prosperity. • Provide a wide array ofbusiness outreach, innovation and competitiveness support services and resources to new and expanding businesses to stimulate job and investment growth. • Foster the development ofappropriate sites, buildings and business parks to attract new and expanding businesses to Los Banos. • Attract and support globally competitive companies; Los Banos will expand employer access to local workforce development resources that develop workers with necessary technical and job-ready skills. • Establish a Business Education Initiative that brings business, government, and education together to form partnerships to ensure future prosperity for students and young people by creating a full range ofunique, results oriented programs to address the needs ofbusiness and students. • Collaborate with property and business owners, residents, and community and business groups to create and sustain a vibrant downtown. August2014 Page 20 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT Capabilities are the programs and polices currently in use to reduce hazard impacts or that could be used to implement hazard mitigation activities. The capability assessment is divided into five sections: regulatory, administrative and technical, fiscal, outreach and partnerships, and other mitigation efforts, ReglliatOlry CapallJiliity The regulatory and planning capabilities table lists planning and land management tools typically used by local jurisdictions to implement hazard mitigation activities. The table below indicates those that are in place in the City of Los Banos. Citv of Los Banos -Relll latoryand Plannin" Canabilities Regulat!lry Tool Yes/No en..., .... General Plan Yes Approved July 15, 2009 Zoning Ordinance Yes Chapter 3 . Municipal Code Subdivision Ordinance Yes Title 9, Chapter 2 - Municipal Code Site Plan Review Yes Title 9, Chapter 3 - Municipal Code Requirements Floodplain Management Yes Title 9, Section 4 - Municipal Code Regulations, Growth Management Other special purpose Yes Title 10, Chapter 2 - Municipal Code (Storm ordinance (storm water, fire Water); Title 4, Chapter 3 (Fire Protection) protection, wildfire) Building Code Yes The 2010 California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 1 (California Administrative Code) Fire department ISO rating Yes Rating: 3 Capital Improvements Plan Yes nla Economic Development Plan Yes Economic Development Strategic Plan, December 2012 Local Emergency Operations Yes 2011, The plan will be updated in 2015 Plan (EOP) Source: Plannmg Team; CIty ofLos Banos WebSIte City otLos Banos General Plan, 2009· The City otLos Banos approved its General Plan revision in July, 2009, with an anticipated horizon year of 2030. This General Plan defines the City's goals, objectives and policies that guide the physical growth, use and development ofland under the jurisdictional authority ofthe City. The purpose of the Public Health and Safety Element is to reduce or eliminate long term risk to people and property from natural or human caused hazards. This element focuses on establishing policies and programs to protect the community from risks associated with seismic, geologic, flood, and fire hazards. The Public Health and Safety Element is now expanded to include community health and community safety related issues that are more commonly associated with the built environment as affecting the health and safety of residents living within the City. City of Los Banos Emergency Plan, 2011- The Emergency Plan addresses the planned response to emergency situations associated with natural disasters, technological incidents, human caused August2014 Page 21 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information events and national security emergencies in or affecting the City ofLos Banos. The plan establishes the emergency management organization required to mitigate any significant emergency or disaster affecting the City; identifies the policies, responsibilities, and procedures required to protect the health and safety of communities, public and private property, and the environmental effects of natural, human caused and technological emergencies and disasters; and establishes the operational concepts and policies for disaster response and recovery. This plan will be revised and updated in 2015 to meet local, state and federal needs. City Fire Management Plan - The City of Los Banos Fire Department is a full service department providing fire protection, fire suppression, inspections, public education, fire responders for medical aids, and all types oftechnical rescue operations. The department operates four (4) front line engines, one reserve engine, one OES engine, one ladder truck, two rescue units, water tender, and other service vehicles. The goals ofthe Los Banos Fire Department and Volunteer Fire Department are: to continue to provide cost effective fire protection and emergency services to the citizens of Los Banos; to improve operational efficiency and accountability; to continue moving in a positive direction providing the best possible service to the community; to continue to foster the Volunteer Fire Department providing training, camaraderie and pride in their department; and to support the goals, objectives and mission ofthe City of Los Banos. The primary mission ofthe Los Banos Fire Department and Volunteer Fire Department is to protect life and property for the citizens ofthe City of Los Banos, from the effect of fires, medical emergencies, vehicle accidents, exposure to hazardous materials, earthquakes, floods, disasters and dangerous conditions. The life safety and property protection mission is accomplished through a wide range ofprograms which include fire protection, fire prevention, planning, fire prevention education, fire inspections, code enforcement, fire suppression, and training. The Los Banos Fire Department also provides mutual aid for fire/rescue and EMS services to other local agencies in Merced County, and participates in the statewide Master Mutual Aid plan. Emergency Services Ordinance, Title 4, Chapter 2 - The declared purposes ofthis chapter are to provide for the preparation and carrying out ofplans for the protection ofpersons and property within the City in the event ofan emergency; the direction of the emergency organization; and the coordination ofthe emergency functions of the City with all other public agencies, corporations, organizations and affected private persons. The council's powers include the development of emergency and mutual aid plans and agreements and the ordinances and resolutions as necessary to implement the Multi-Hazard Functional Plan and any other such plans and agreements. California Fire Code - Title 4, Chapter 3 - For the purpose of prescribing regulations governing conditions hazardous to life and property from fire, hazardous materials or explosion, that certain Code known as the 2013 California Fire Code (Part 9 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), as published by the International Code Council, together with all appendices and subsequent additions and editions thereto, one copy ofwhich is on file in the office ofthe City Clerk for public record and inspection, is hereby adopted by reference and made a part ofthis chapter as though set forth in this chapter in full, subject, however, to the amendments, additions, and deletions set forth in this chapter, and said Code shall be known as the Fire Prevention Code ofthe City of Los Banos. (§ 1, Ord. 1066, eff. February 1, 2008, as amended by § 1, Ord. 1099, eff. August 20,2011, and § 1, Ord. 1117, eff. March 19,2014) Floodplain Management Ordinance Chapter 9-Sec.4-9.12 • It is the purpose of this chapter to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare, and to minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions in specific areas by provisions designed to: August2014 Page 22 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information • Protect human life and health; • Minimize expenditure of public money for costly flood control projects; • Minimize the need for rescue and relief efforts associated with flooding and generally undertaken at the expense ofthe general public; • Minimize prolonged business interruptions; • Minimize damage to public facilities and utilities such as water and gas mains; electric, telephone and sewer lines; and streets and bridges located in areas of special flood hazard; • Help maintain a stable tax base by providing for the sound use and development ofareas of special flood hazard so as to minimize future blighted areas caused by flood damage; • Ensure that potential buyers are notified that property is in an area ofspecial flood hazard; and, • Ensure that those who occupy the areas ofspecial flood hazard assume responsibility for their actions. Admil1listJrative ami Teclmical Capability The table below identifies city personnel with responsibilities for activities related to mitigation and loss prevention in the City ofLos Banos. Many positions are full time and/or filled by the same person. Asummary oftechnical resources follows. Citv ofLos Banos - Personnel Capabilities Personnel Resources ri ,. Engineer and/or Planner with City Community Development Department; Public knowledge ofland development/land Works Department; Planning/Redevelopment manal!ement practices Deoartment Professional trained in construction City Community Development Department; Public practices related to buildings and/or Works Department; Planning/Redevelopment infrastructure Department; Chief Building Official; Plan Checkers; Buildinl! Insoectors Full time building official City Community Development Department; Building Deoartment Floodplain Manager City Community Development Department; Public Works Department Emergency Manager City Administrator's Office; Fire Chief Grants Manager Administration Other Many other agencies and departments within the City support personnel capabilities to carry out hazard mitigation activities Source: CIty ofLos Banos Website; Plannmg. Team; OES Merced County has a full-time GIS coordinator who assists the cities and districts in the county with GIS data needs. Merced County, in conjunction the cities of Merced, Los Banos, Livingston, Gustine, Dos Palos fire, law enforcement, health, and emergency medical service agencies, launched the Emergency Notification System (ENS) - a technical capability service allowing residents throughout the entire county to be alerted ofan emergency or an important community alert in their area. The improved Merced County Emergency Notification System (ENS) will allow residents throughout the county alternate ways of being contacted during an emergency, such as cell phones, business phones, home phones, emails, text messages or hearing impaired receiving devices. More importantly, individuals can choose how they will be notified and in what preference order. When an emergency message is issued about a potential safety hazard or concern, messages will be sent August2014 Page 23 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information to all standard voice and text communication devices registered in the system, including home phones, cell phones, e-mail, and more. Residents and businesses with listed telephone numbers are already included in the system. Those residents having only a cell phone or wanting to be contacted through different methods can provide the information using the registration link at www.co.merced.ca.us/alert. fiscal CapabHiIty The following table identifies financial tools or resources that the City could potentially use to help fund mitigation activities. There are currently no specific funding sources for hazard mitigation. City ofLos Banos -Available FinancIal Tools and Resources 1~~Il~~i~I~1 ..... "L• Eligible to Use Community Development Block Yes Grants Capital improvements project Yes funding Authority to levy taxes for specific Yes Must be approved by voters purposes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or Yes electric services, new development Incur debt through general Yes obligation bonds Incur debt through special tax Yes Requires approval by two-thirds ofvoters bonds Incur debt through private Yes Do not have any in place activities Federal Grant Programs (Hazard Yes Various Departments Mitigation Grant Program) Source: Planmng Team Olltreach and Partnerships The Merced County Office of Emergency Services provides education and outreach on Disaster Preparedness for all ofthe jurisdictions within the County. This education program is in coordination and partnerships with county and the cities' departments with education programs including the Sheriffs Office, Police Departments, Fire Departments, Agricultural Commissioner, and the Department of Public Health. Planning Commission The Planning Commission performs the duties described in the present or any future zoning ordinances and subdivision regulations ofthe City's Municipal Code. This includes any similar ordinance, statute, rule or regulation ofthe State, County or this City pertaining to the districting, zoning or dividing the city into districts or zones and regulating the construction of improvements, the use, division or minor subdivision of property within the City. The City Council provides the Planning Commission with its directions and assigns tasks. The Planning Commission is charged with the responsibility ofstudying the needs ofthe City in which they advise and recommend to the City Council concerning the establishment, modifications and change ofzones or districts, and designations ofthe uses to which property contained therein may be prohibited, restricted, and August2014 Page 24 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information regulated and other duties as may be delegated by the City Council The Economic Development Advisory Committee The Los Banos Economic Development Advisory Commission (EDAC) was formed to assist the City of Los Banos in an advisory capacity. Cities throughout the State of California have Economic Development Advisory Commissions that meet monthly and provide ideas and support for economic projects within each jurisdiction's redevelopment area. Traffic Safety Committee The City of Los Banos has established a Traffic Safety Committee as outlined in Los Banos Municipal Code Section 4-5.05. It was established in 1992. Members include representatives from the Public Works Department, Community & Economic Development Department, Police Department, Fire Department, and Planning Commission. This Committee has the duty ofinitiating or reviewing all proposals or requests for establishment, modification, elimination, or removal ofall traffic control signs, signals, markings, speed zones, prohibited or restricted parking zones, or other such related matters, which fall under the lawful discretionary control ofthe City. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The City of Los Banos adopts the hazard mitigation goals and objectives developed by the Planning Team and described in Element C.3 Mitigation Goals in the Merced County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2014. The goals and objectives are consistent with the overall direction ofthe County regarding mitigation efforts and based upon the risk assessment completed. MITIGATION ACTIONS The Planning Team identified and prioritized the following mitigation actions based on risk assessments, goals, and objectives. Background information as well as information on how the action will be implemented and administered, such as ideas for implementation, responsible office, partners, potential funding, estimated cost, and timeline also are described. 2014 Miti2:atiolJ. ActIOns Action: #1 - Countywide Public Education and Awareness Pro2ram Jurisdiction: Multi-jurisdictional Priority: Hil!h Issue/Background: The Planning Team identified the need for a natural hazards education and awareness program in Merced County to be a valuable tool for information to residents. Based on the Public Participation Survey for the mitigation plan update project, online information is an effective way to disseminate information to Merced County. Ideas for Improved information about natural hazards may be implemented. The Implementation: county may also work with special districts, the cities and other entities to provide awareness and education on hazards and steps to mitil!ate. Responsible Merced County OES Office: Partners: Cities, Special Districts Potential Fundinl!: Federal Grants Cost Estimate: 100,000 Benefits: Provides timely, accurate information to our public, both constituents and (Losses Avoidedl employees. Ensures consistent information flow. Improves public August2014 Page2S City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information Timeline: Action: #2 - Inte!!rate Local Hazard Miti!!ation Plan into General Plan Jurisdiction: Multi-jurisdictional Priority: Medium Issue/Background: The Merced County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan evaluates and addresses the same hazards that must also be addressed in local government general plans in California. Recognizing the potential duplication ofeffort over evaluation ofthe same issues, efforts to update the Health and Safety Element should be conducted in coordination with the multi-hazard miti!!ation plan and to also ensure AB2140 Compliance. Ideas for Merced County including the City of Los Banos has participated in the Implementation: development of the countywide mitigation plan from the outset to ensure that a high degree of input and coordination occurred. The Community Development Agency should follow through in the integration and implementation of the recommended policies and actions in the plan for reducing potential hazard-related losses throughout the county. The plan can be integrated as a major part of the county's Health and Safety Element ofthe General Plan uodate. Responsible Merced County Community Development Agency, City of Los Banos Office: Partners: Merced County OES, Cities Potential Fundin!!: General Fund Cost Estimate: $5,000 Benefits: Provides General Plan policy direction for development activity. Potential (Losses Avoided) loss reductions in the $1000s as any new development within the county will be considered within the context ofthe county's Health and Safety Element. Timeline: Next General Plan review cvcle Action: #3 - Non-Structural EQ Miti!!ation Outreach Jurisdiction: Multi-jurisdictional Priority: Medium Issue/Background: Existing structures can be retrofitted to better withstand damage from seismic events. By educating home and business owners about structural and non-structural retrofit techniques by teaching them how to seismically strengthen their homes and business locations can be an effective mitigation tool. Development ofan outreach program to secure furnishings, storage cabinets and utilities to prevent injuries and damages, such as anchoring, installing lathes, using flexible connections on gas and water lines, and bracing propane tanks and water heaters. Ideas for Implement Countywide Implementation: Responsible Community Development, Public Works Office: Partners: Merced Countv OES, Citv of Los Banos, Soecial Districts Potential Fundin!!: Federal Grants Cost Estimate: $100,000 August 2014 Page 26 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information Benefits: Increase in population knowledge ofstructural and non-structural (Losses Avoided) mitigation activities needed to mitigate the affects ofthose hazards Timeline: 1 vear then Ongoing Action: #4 - Countywide Unreinforced Masonry URM Inventory Jurisdiction: Multi-jurisdictional Prioritv: Medium Issue/Background: Many historic brick buildings are located within Merced County and need to be tracked accordingly in case ofan earthquake. Ideas for Implement through County, City GIS a mechanism to map and track URMs Implementation: Countywide. Responsible Merced County Public Works, City of Los Banos Office: Partners: Merced County OES, Citv of Los Banos, Special Districts Potential Fundin/!: Federal Grants Cost Estimate: $15,000 - 20,000 Benefits: Accurate inventory ofURM Buildings with appropriate tracking will lessen (Losses Avoided) time for Recovery after an EQ. Timeline: 1 vear Action: #5 - Enforcement ofBuildinl! Codes Jurisdiction: Multi-iurisdictional Prioritv: Medium Issue/Background: Continued throughout county Ideas for Implement Countywide Implementation: Responsible Planning Department Office: Partners: Merced County OES, Citv of Los Banos, Special Districts Potential Fundin/!: Federal Grants Cost Estimate: Staff Time Benefits: Increase knowledge ofpotential hazards and activities needed to mitigate (Losses Avoided) the affects ofthose hazards; hazard mitigation plan approval and oversight Timeline: 1 year then Ongoing Action: #6 - Hazard Specific Flood Guidance Annex Jurisdiction: Merced County, City of Los Banos Priority: High Issue/Background: Develop a Hazard Specific Flood Annex for all jurisdictions with concentration on flood hazard as described in the Risk Assessment. Ideas for Seek Department ofWater Resources Grants to develop a document that Implementation: addresses the flood hazard, associated risks, current and past mitigation efforts specific to the streams and localized flood areas in the county. Responsible City and County OES Office: Partners: Merced Countv and City of Los Banos Public Works, Special Districts August2014 Page 27 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information Potential Fundin2: Federal Grants Cost Estimate: $90,000 Benefits: Provides standard operating policy and procedures for all participating (Losses Avoided) agencies and jurisdictions within Merced County Timeline: 1 vear Action: #7 - Winter Weather PreDaredness CamDaie:n lurisdiction: Multi-jurisdictional Priority: Hh!h Issue/Background: The Plannjng Team identified the continuation and enhancement of the natural hazards education and awareness program in Merced County to be a valuable tool for information to residents. Based on the Public participation Survey for the mitigation plan update project, online information is an effective way to disseminate information to Merced County. Develop a Winter Weather Preparedness program to target severe weather in Merced Countv. Ideas for Improved information about natural hazards may be implemented into Implementation: media outlets and tools already in use by the county and cities, this project would add or enhance the existing, minimal campaign to include information on pertinent topics, such as Severe Weather Hazards, Fog, Freeze, Warming Centers, Heat Related Illness, All Hazards Preparedness information, etc.; The county may also work with special districts, the cities and other entities to provide awareness and education on hazards and steos to mitigate. Responsible Merced County DES, Los Banos Fire Department Office: Partners: Special Districts Potential Fundinj(: Federal Grants Cost Estimate: 100,000 Benefits: Provides timely, accurate information to our public, both constituents and (Losses Avoided) employees. Ensures consistent information flow. Improves public awareness and education. Timeline: Continuous/Ongoing/Annuallv Action: #8 - Promote Water Conservation Proe:ram Jurisdiction: Multi-iurisdictional Priority: High Issue/Background: Drought is a serious issue that is faced in California. Water awareness ofall citizens within the County is critical to the future ofour water supply. Reminders, education and awareness will help keep the conservation importance in the forefront. Ideas for Improved information about natural hazards may be implemented into Implementation: media outlets and tools already in use by the county and cities, this project would create/enhance Water Conservation public education campaign. Countywide partners will work to provide awareness and education on water conservation and steos to conservation. Responsible Merced County DES, Los Banos Fire Department Office: August2014 Page 28 City ofLos Banos Community Profile Information Partners: Special Districts Potential Fundin2: Federal Grants Cost Estimate: 100,000 Benefits: Provides timely, accurate information to our public, both constituents and (Losses Avoided) employees. Ensures consistent information flow. Improves public awareness and education. Timeline: Continuous/Ongoing/Annually August 2014 Page 29 tosBanos Agenda Staff Report TO: Mayor & City Council Members FROM: Mark Fachin, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer (;r)J()A.A1a-eJLA-'\~ DATE: August 19, 2015 SUBJECT: Los Banos State Route 152 Comprehensive Operational Study TYPE OF REPORT: Non Consent Agenda Recommendation: That the City Council adopts the Resolution approving the 'Draft Los Banos State Route 152 Comprehensive Operational Study', dated June 1, 2015, as prepared by the California Department of Transportation with the following exceptions: 1. The installation of the raised medians as outlined in the draft study is not approved by the City Council 2. All intersection widening improvements to accommodate U-turns are not approved by the City Council 3. The installation of a cul-de-sac on 9th Street at the intersection of State Route 152 and 9th Street is not approved by the City Council 4. The closing of existing driveways onto State Route 152 is not approved by the City Council Background: California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has prepared a Draft Los Banos State Route 152 Comprehensive Operational Study, dated June 1, 2015. This study is intended to address the operational treatment of this corridor (Pacheco Boulevard) that will meet the needs of the interregional traveler. Since the Los Banos Bypass has been delayed due to funding shortfalls, Pacheco Boulevard is in need of feasible operational improvements to increase the efficiency and safety of this highway segment. The recommended improvements in this study are intended to • Increase safety • Improve operational performance • Enhance mobility and convenience • Improve environmental outcomes • Boost productivity The study has recommended the following improvements to the State Route 152 corridor: 1. Signal timing and optimization 2. Signal upgrades 3. Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) consisting of seven (7) elements • Changeable message signs • Closed circuit television • Maintenance vehicle pullouts • Traffic monitoring stations • Roadside weather information system • Highway advisory radio • Extinguishable message signs 4. Elimination of one crosswalk at the intersections of I street, 4th Street, and 6th Street 5. Installation of raised median at the following locations: • Between Ortigalita Road and West I Street • West I Street to Maryland Avenue • Illinois Avenue to Arizona Avenue • Arizona Avenue to Nevada Avenue • 4th Street to 6th Street • Driveway 200 feet east of SR-165 (Mercey Springs Rd) to Miller Lane • Driveway 400 feet west of Ward Road to Ward Road 6. Install intersection widening improvements to accommodate U-turns because of the installation of the raised medians • West I Street, widen NW and SE corners • Maryland Avenue, widen NW corner • Arizona Avenue, widen NW corner • Nevada Avenue, widen NW corner • 4th Street, widen SE corner • 6th Street, widen NW corner • Miller Lane, widen NW corner 7. Between Badger Flat Road and Ortigalita Road, modify striping to convert eastbound trap lane to a right turn lane 8. Driveway closures/modifications at the following locations: • Between Ortigalita Road and West I Street, close westerly driveway, convert middle driveway to right in/out and exclude left out on easterly driveway • West I Street, close westerly driveway at NE corner g. At gth Street, install cul-de-sac 10. At Ward Road, allow westbound U-turns 11. Install 48 ADA compliant curb ramps Discussion: On July 23,2015, a public meeting was held at the Community Center to discuss this draft study. The meeting was noticed on the City's website, an article was published in regards to the meeting by the Los Banos Enterprise, and 250 individual letters to businesses and residences along Pacheco Boulevard were mailed. Approximately 40 individuals attended the public meeting. Counting the input at the meeting and correspondence received by staff, over 15 business owners/residents have expressed their concerns in regards to the draft study. The areas of concerns were: a) The installation of the raised median would severely impact the businesses along Pacheco Boulevard b) The installation of a cul-de-sac at gth Street would impact several businesses and create an unfavorable local street traffic situation c) The elimination of existing driveways would impact access to businesses Due to the citizen input that has been received by staff, the recommendation is that the City Council approves the findings in the Draft Los Banos State Route 152 Operational Study, dated June 1, 2015, with the following exceptions: 1. The installation of the raised medians as outlined in the draft study is not approved by the City Council 2. All intersection widening improvements to accommodate U-turns are not approved by the City Council 3. The installation of a cul-de-sac on 9th Street at the intersection of State Route 152 and 9th Street is not approved by the City Council 4. The closing of existing driveways onto State Route 152 is not approved by the City Council Fiscal Impact: The improvements as stated in the Draft Study are to be funded by the State Highway Operations and Protection Program (SHOPP) and the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Program. Funding applications will need to be submitted and individual projects will have to compete for the grants. Reviewed by: Steve Carrigan, City Manager Attachments: Resolution Draft Los Banos State Route 152 Comprehensive Operational Study RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS APPROVING THE 'DRAFT LOS BANOS STATE ROUTE 152 COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONAL STUDY' DATED JUNE 1, 2015, AS PREPARED BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WITH THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS: THE INSTALLATION OF THE RAISED MEDIANS AS OUTLINED IN THE DRAFT STUDY IS NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL; ALL INTERSECTION WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE U-TURNS ARE NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL; THE INSTALLATION OF A CUL-DE-SAC ON 9TH STREET AT THE INTERSECTION OF STATE ROUTE 152 AND 9TH STREET IS NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL; AND THE CLOSING OF EXISTING DRIVEWAYS ONTO STATE ROUTE 152 IS NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, THE City of Los Banos City Council has reviewed the 'Draft Los Banos State Route 152 Comprehensive Operational Study' dated June 1, 2015, as prepared by the California Department of Transportation; and WHEREAS, the City of Los Banos has conducted a public outreach effort; and WHEREAS, a public meeting was held on July 23, 2015, to discuss the Draft Study; and WHEREAS, based on the public outreach comments, the Public Works Department requests the City Council approve the 'Draft Los Banos State Route 152 Comprehensive Operational Study' dated June 1, 2015, prepared by the California Department of Transportation with the following exceptions: 1. The installation of the raised medians as outlined in the draft study is not approved by the City Council 2. All intersection widening improvements to accommodate U-turns are not approved by the City Council 3. The installation of a cul-de-sac on 9th Street at the intersection of State Route 152 and 9th Street is not approved by the City Council 4. The closing of existing driveways onto State Route 152 is not approved by the City Council 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Los Banos does hereby approve the 'Draft Los Banos State Route 152 Comprehensive Operational Study' dated June 1, 2015, prepared by the California Department of Transportation with the following exceptions: 1. The installation of the raised medians as outlined in the draft study is not approved by the City Council 2. All intersection widening improvements to accommodate U-turns are not approved by the City Council 3. The installation of a cul-de-sac on 9th Street at the intersection of State Route 152 and 9th Street is not approved by the City Council 4. The closing of existing driveways onto State Route 152 is not approved by the City Council The foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Los Banos held on the 19th day of August 2015, by Council Member ___ who moved its adoption, which motion was duly seconded by Council Member ___ and the Resolution adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: APPROVED: Michael VillaIta, Mayor ATIEST: Lucille L. Mallonee, City Clerk 2 ~ N"'O Ln :J ~ -Q)V\ ~- o:J s:0 0::0 Q)~Ln.- ~O_ o i- 0 ~ Q) - V\ 0." '" 0 .. os: Q) Q) :::> s: O .- :J al"'- o'" Q)s: ....I.t:Q) \:1::' '-o E0. C 0 U Table of Contents 1. Introduction" .. ".,."."" .. ",."",...""",.,.. ",.".,."",.",.. ,., .. ""."".""."",...,.. ,., .. ,.. ,..."."" .. ,.".,.. ,..."""",".""",.,.. ,.,.",.,.".,.. ".,."""""",.".,...",.""." 1 2, Existing Corridor Conditions,.""",.. ".,."., " .. ",.. """".,.. ,."" ....,., .. ",.. ""." ",.. ,., ....""",.. ",.. " ...... ,.. ,."." ...".",.. "."."."".".,... ",.".,.. ,., .. ".,.,." .. 2 Route Features and Classification.,.. ,.. ,." ,.. ,., .. ",.",.,.,.,."."" .. ",.. ,.".,.,.", ,.. ,., .. ",.. ,.. ,.. " ,.".".,."",.. ,.,.".,.".,.. ,."." .. ,., .. ,.. ,., .. "".", """,.,.. 2 Deficiencies and Needs on sR-1s2 within the City of los Banos 2 3. Pia nned Corridor Improvements,.".,.",.,.,.. ".,.,.. ,.. ,.,.,.. ,."."""",.".",.. ,.. ,." "",.,.. ,.. , ,.,.",.,.,." .. ,., .. ",.. " ,., ,, ",.,.. "".,." .. ",.. " ".5 land Use.. ,."",."."." ,.".,.,.,.. "" ...,.. " .. ",.,.,.. ,."".,.. ",.. ",.. ,."",...,.. ,."., ".",.. ,.".".,."",.".,....,.. ,." ..."",.""."."., " .. " ', ....,.. ,.".".,.. ,.".,." .. 5 Transportation,.".,.. " "."""" .. ,.".,.".,.".".",.".,.. ,...... ,.. ,., .. ",.. "., ", " ....,.. " .. " ....." .. ,.".,.. ,.".".,."",.,.. ",... ,.,.,.. ,.. ".,.. ,."" .. , ",.. ," ....,.. "., 7 Plan ned and Programmed Projects."."",." ..."."".,.. ,., .. ,., .. ,."., "."., ",.,.".",.. ,.. ,., .. ,.. ".,... "."." ... " .. ",.. ,.,.".".,.",.".,.,.. ""." ",.",.. ,.".,' ,9 4. Multimodal Access Issues,.,.. ""., ",.. ,....,.. ,.. ,... ".,." ,.. "".,.. ,.,."., " .. ",.".,.".",.. ,.",.",.".,.. ".",.. ,.. ,."",.,.. , "." .. ,., .",... ",.. , "".".', " .11 Overview,.,.. """." .. "."",...""." ".".,.".",.. ,.. ",.. , ,."".".""."., " .. ,." ...""." ,... ",.. ,."."",.,.,.. ,.. ,., .. ,...." ,.',.,.. ,.. ,."",., ",."" .. ",.. "., "., 11 Access Strategy,.,.. ".,.. """".".,.. ,,....,.".".,.,.".,.. , "."" ....".,.".""" .. ",.. ,."." ,.".", ,.. ,., .. ,."."",.,.,.,,.. ,., .. ",.. ".,."."",.,,,,.,,,,,,,,.,,,,.. ,., .. ,,, .. ,,. 11 Network MobilityICon nectivity,."."" .. ".,.. ,...".".,.. ,."".,.,.. ,.".,.. ,.. ,., .. " ,., .. ,." ,."., ",.,.. ,.".""",... " .. ",.. ,.. ,." ... "."." ,.. '",.. ,.. ,., ",.. ,.".,. 12 5, Street Design and Ca Itrans' standards,."."".".,.. ,....",.. ,., .. ,."."., ".,.. ,,.. ".,.""."., " .. ,.,.",."" .. ",."" .. ,.".,.. ,.. ,.. ,."." " .. ,.".," .. " ".".,.. , 14 6, Corridor Operations and Management",.. ,.. ,.. ,.. ,.. " .. ,."",.",.. ".,." ".".,.,."."",.,.,."."."."",.,.,."",."".,.. ".,.. ,.,.",.".,.".".,.,.. ".,." .. ,.,.", ,.. ,.".". 15 Overview,.,.. ,.".".",." .. ,., ....,.".,.. ",."", ,.".,.,.".",... ,.,." ....,.. ,.".,.,.. "".,.. ",.. ,.. ,....,... " .. ,.".".,.. "".,...... "., ,.. ,."."."."" .. ', "" .. , ".".,'.,.,.. ", 15 Proposed Improvements.. ",... ".".,.,."."" ,.. ".,.,.. "".".,."" .. ,., ".,.,....".".,.,.. ,., .. ".,.,." .. ,.. ,."."".".,." .. , "" ,., ... ",.",'.. ,."." ,.. ,." ",.,.,.. " 16 7, Needs Assessment and 1m piementation,., .. "" .. ,.. ,.. , ,.""" ....."., ",.. ,.. ,."."" ...... ".,.. '.,." .. ,."." ... " ,.".".,.. ,.,.",.,... ",.".,.,.. ,.. " "" .. ,." .. " ,.".,28 Overview.,.. ,.".""."".".,."".".,.. ,.,." .. , ,."."".""." "".,.. ,.. "" "."" .. ,.,.".".,.".".,.. ,.".,.. ,....,.. , ,." ....,.. ",.. ".,."." .. ,....,.".", ,." .. ,.".""",. 28 CriticaI Needs,.".,.".".,."""".".,.. " ...," .. " .. ,.. ,...." ".".,.,.. ",.. " ",.. ,,.. " ,."."., ,... " .. ".,." .. ,., .. ,.".,.. ,.".".,.. ,."."",.,.. ""." " .. ,." .. ",."., 28 Funding" ..."."".,.".,.".,."." ...,.".".,.,.. ",.. " ,.".,.. ,., ".,.,.".,.. ".,.""." "."., ,.. ,."., " .. ,.,.".".,'.,.,.".", ,.. '." ...,.. " .. ,,.. ,",.,.. ,." .. ,..." ....,.. ,.29 Prioritization and 1m plementation,.. """" ,....".,.,.".".,..."",.,.. """.".,.,.. ".,.,."",." ,." .. ",.. ".,." ....,."." " ....,.. ,.,." .. ," .. ,. ,.. ,., .. """,.".".,'.,. 31 1. Introduction current transportation system, restore lost capacity by improving Implementation of the State Route (SR) 152 bypass ofthe City of Los throughput, reduce congestion and delay, and improve travel-time Banos, delayed due to shortfalls in funding, requires an effort to reliability in a cost effective manner. ITS includes the planning, address conditions on the existing alignment that continues through hardware acquisition, and maintenance for multimodal integration of the City. Past commercial and residential development along the technology, data communication inter-operability, real-time data corridor hamper expansion of the facility to address current traffic monitoring, and timely, accurate user information. The recommended volumes, while new development traffic and access points create strategies are intended to: additional conflict points and longer signal queues. Additional challenges arise in the geometrics of intersections with some local 1. Increase safety - preventing or reducing accidents and streets not laid out in grid pattern, resulting in askew intersections. improving emergency response communications The route, while not technically a "Main Street" highway, passes 2. Improve Operational Performance - maximizing capacity by through the City linking new housing development, large commercial improving throughput enterprises, schools, and small business roughly parallel with the older 3. Enhance Mobility and Convenience - reducing congestion downtown area. It also carries regional/interregional commercial, agricultural, and recreational traffic through to, and from, the central 4. Improve Environmental Outcomes - reducing fuel consumption coast and southern San Francisco Bay area to SR 99 and beyond. and emissions The study will seek to identify feasible operational treatments that will 5. Boost Productivity and Economic Growth - reducing travel meet the needs ofthe people in Los Banos for a traversable multimodal times andfuel costs facility and the near term needs of the interregional traveler for a route that is efficient without a degradation in safety. Caltrans is committed Finally, the study will facilitate the development of an investment to supporting and encouraging multimodal and "active" transportation strategy by identifying and prioritizing ITS and operational (human-powered), a healthy alternative to traveling in a vehicle by improvements along the route that are mutually beneficial to the accommodating and enhancing connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists. interregional traveler and the City. Through Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) and operational improvement strategies, we can better operate and manage the 1 2. Existing Corridor Conditions Route Features and Classification Deficiencies and Needs on SR 152 within the City of Los Banos Within Merced County, SR 152 is comprised of two facilities expressway for the route outside of the City of Los Banos, and Caltrans designated SR 152 as a high emphasis route on the IRRS with conventional highway within the City limits. SR 152 (Pacheco the intent to provide an expressway interconnection to urban places Boulevard) within the City of Los Banos is currently comprised of four since 1996. The Los Banos Bypass Project (Bypass) addresses this lanes and two-way left turn lane (TWLTL) for much of the segment, with goal. With funding shortfalls, and delays to implementation, interim multiple access points (stop-controlled intersections, and driveways), solutions consistent with community visions and input are desired. and has thirteen signalized intersections. Posted speed limits vary from The current configuration of SR 152 in Los Banos is inimical to 30 to 50 miles per hour (MPH). The portion of SR 152 that is Caltrans commitment to complete streets and active transportation expressway is, for the most part, access-controlled with fewer access alternatives by having facilities that serve all travel modes including points, and a posted speed limit of 55 MPH. bicycle, pedestrian, and transit. The travel way is overcommitted to SR 152 is a principal arterial on the National Highway System (NHS), travel by automobiles and trucks at expense of cyclists, and on the Freeway Expressway System, and the Interregional Road pedestrians. Narrow shoulders (shoulder width is variable) along System (IRRS). It is a Surface Transportation Assistance Act (STAA) with high traffic volumes does not encourage the use of bicycles on and Terminal Access truck route on the National Network. 5R 152 through Los Banos. Intermittent sidewalks along with crosswalks of seventy-five feet or longer present little incentive to Peak hour Level of Service (LOS) for the Los Banos segment is travel by foot. Both bicycle and pedestrian LOS (obtained by currently F. The expressway segments (outside of Los Banos) have ARTPLAN 2012) for the segment average an LOS of F. an LOS above the concept LOS of C. By 2030, only one of the expressway segments will exceed the concept LOS. Transit service along the corridor fares better, in part because of the proximity and extent of service hours produce an overall LOS of E Existing route facility features through the City are summarized in (obtained by ARTPLAN 2012). This in part reflects available ridership Table 1, page 3. and demand, and should improve as transit demand and ridership increases. 2 Table 1. Summary Conditions College to - _....•. ~., lON, 105 Badger Flat Badger Flat to No N, Ag, Open Space N 18.882/19.268 4 Yes, raised Off 5t. No Yes, off route 6 N. 45 Ortlgalita Yes S CommercialS Ortigalita to Yes,S to Ag,OpenSpace N 19.268/19.618 2 N, 65 W.15t. 19.481 Commercial S W. 1St. to No No 19.618/19.781 4 Off St. No Yes to 19.629 Commercial N/S 9 N. 95 Maryland Maryland to 19.781/19.830 Yes N/5 Commercial N/S 5 N. 45 Iowa No Iowa to Souza 19.830/19.901 4 Off St. No No Yes N/5 Commercial N/5 5 N. 55 Souza to ....Utll ,.·;:' ...,""! 19.901/19.930 " 2 N, 35 Paradise Residential Paradise to No Commercial! 19.930/19.970 4 Off St. No No Yes N/5 2 N. 45 Illinois Residential Illinois to Commercial! 19.970/20.028 4 N, 45 Arizona ReSidential Arizona to No 20.028/20.090 4 Off St. No No Yes NjS Commercial 5 N, 35 Nevada Nevada to Commercial/ 20.090/20.186 4N,45 California ReSidential California to Commercial! 20.186/20.253 4 No Off St. No No Yes N/5 3 N, 25 Center Residential th Center to 4 20.253/20.289 CommerCial 3 N, 3 S th t 4 to 6 l> St. 20.289/20.420 4 At grade Off St. No No Yes N/S Commercial 5 N, 75 N 6th to i h St. 20.420/20.590 4 N, lOS 5 3 Table 1. (continued) th th 9 to 10 20.749/20.870 4 None Off St. No No Yes N/S Commercial 6 N, 7 S 10th to J St. 20.870/20.916 Commercial 1 N, 4 S 1h j to 11 St, 20.916/20.990 4 None Off St. No No Yes N/S Commercial 4 N. 75 11th to I St. & Commercjal! 20.990/21.058 4 N, 3 S H St. Residential Los Banos H St and 21.0S8/2l.176 4 None Off St. No No Yes N/S Commercial 3 N, 4 S ! to 13(h 13lh teJCT SR·165 21.176/21.272 Commercial GN,3S SR-165/Los Banos Yes, partial 21.272/21.610 4 Off St. No Ves, off route Yes N/S Commercial 9 N. 10 S & RR Xing to Miller raised Miller In. LT to Commercial! 21.610/21.680 3N,5S Tanner Rd.RT. Residential Tanner Rd. RT. to 21.680/21.761 4 Yes, raised Off St. No No Yes S Commercia! 1 N, 2 S Place Rd. RT. ....v""'n:' ...'a" Place to Nickel 21,761/21.795 1 N, 2 S Residential Yes, raised Yes, N to Ward; Commercial! Nickel to Ward 21.79S/22.252 4 Off St. No Yes, off route 8 N, 7 S and at grade S to PM 21.977 Residential Ward to San luis Canal Ll;'::J11 Residential! San Luis Canal to Yes. N PM 22.998 22.998/23.915 4 Expressway Off St. No No Commercial! 10 N, SS Santa Fe to 23.106 Open Space 4 3. Planned Corridor Improvements commercial (see Map 1 next page). New development along the route consists of, primarily, commercial with a concentration of business Land Use development on the west end of town. At build-out, Agriculture at 22% remains the predominant land use, with Single/Multi-family residential Merced County General Plan comprising 12% of the land area and Commercial/Industrial 14%. 30% of the land area is undesignated but assigned "Other" and is presumed The Merced County General Plan designates land along SR 1S2 as to include parks, roadways, and rail line. Agricultural (A) up to Interstate (I)S and Foothill Pasture (FP) from I-S to Santa Clara County. The County defers to the City of Los Banos land use Guiding policies in the Land Use Element reflect the City's desire for a planning for area within their sphere of influence. Outside the City pattern of growth that protects agricultural lands and its small town limits, the predominately rural context is intensively cultivated in A, and character, sustainability, and requires development mitigation for the very low density, less intensive grazing land in FP. costs of infrastructure, services, and transportation facilities. Imple menting actions for community design policies specific to the Aside from farm to market activity, especially dairy, very little local SR 1S2/Pacheco Blvd. corridor are: traffic is generated in these land use designations. Minimum parcel size LU-f-12 Promote pedestrian-oriented development in selected areas, including in A is 20 acres, and in FP, 160 acres (20-40 if previous zoning was A), downtown, neighborhood centers, and Pacheco Boulevard corridor. minimizing access points along the route. Most of the pass through traffic is either travel to and from the City of Merced for services, or LU·'·13 Require street trees on all public street/fontages and adopt street guidelines interregional, traveling to and from the South Bay Area and coast. that specify preferred species, spacing requirements and planting guidelines in coordinating with the Urban Tree Foundation. Los Banos General Plan (LBGP) I.U-I-14 Establish a distinct design characterfor Pacheco Boulevard with signage, landscaping, designer poles, and other visual cues to provide 0 celebrated entrance into Existing developed land uses along SR 152 are a mix of commercial, the City. single-family residential, and vacant land. Agricultural land use occupies LU~I~18 a majority (70%) of the acreage within the planning area. Single/Multi Ensure that developments incorporate safety concerns into the site, circulation, building design and landscaping plans through the design review process. family residential land use is a distant second at less than 10%, followed by Commercial/Industrial at 4%. In the incorporated area, le55 than 16'16 The subarea serves as aregional retail center accessible to local and is agricultural, with housing at 32% and 9% Commerciai/lndustrial. regional shoppers on both sides of the corridor. The Plan seeks to phase out industrial and warehouse sites and relocate them to indus Future land use along SR 152 in los Banos is designated primarily Com trial and employment parks. It also seeks to minimize curb cuts along mercial along the frontage, with low and medium residential behind the East Pacheco Blvd., requiring site access from side streets, if possible. 5 Transportation Several studies address current and future conditions on SR 152 within 2. 2030 Merced County General Plan (Mintier and Harnish, Los Banos. December 10, 2013) 1. City ofLos Bonos Traffic Model and Transpartatian Master The policies and mitigation reported for the Circulation Element of Plan (Master Plan, Prism Engineering, May 5, 2010) the 2030 Merced County General Plan (GP) would apply to portions of 5R 152 adjacent to the City of Los Banos, and possibly those land The Master Plan was developed to allow for evaluation of traffic uses within the City's sphere of influence. Policy C1R-l.5 identifies a operations and intersection turning movements at the micro-level minimal roadway L05 of 'C' for rural, and 'D' for urban areas and of of analysis, with the intent of developing a mitigation fee program connectors between urban areas. Policy CIR-l.7 indentifies a presumably to partially fund local street intersection improvements commitment to developing alternative transportation modes with with, or without, the Bypass. The traffic model employed new development. Policy Cir-l.22 reports intent to develop new attempted to develop a traffic scenario for the year 2030 with or urban streets within urban communities in conformity with without the Bypass. For 2025, the report has Pacheco Blvd. at LOS F complete streets criteria (further elaborated in Goals Clr-3, Cir-4, without the Bypass (Although data is provided for LOS at and Clr-5). No specific discussion for Los Banos was identified. intersections in Table 3.2 on page 18 of the Master Plan, this is presumed to be segment LOS). Proposed mitigation would be a 3. Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) 2014-2040 Sustainable widening to a six lane facility, for which there is no available right of Communities Strategyfor Merced County (Merced County way set aside for expansion in the urban corridor. Encroachment by Association ofGovernments (MCAG), 2014) commercial land uses renders expensive, and likely infeasible, the The RTP contains policies consistent with the Circulation Element of purchase of additional right of way. the GP. A map of the regional road system on page 29 ofthe RTP A license plate survey estimated that 22% of total traffic found shows the layout of the northern Bypass alternative. Two stages of entering Los Banos on 5R 152 on the City's western limits passed the Bypass development are discussed on page 34, segment 1 and through the City to its eastern limits, but that this traffic was segment 2, as Tier 1 projects (financially constrained). A commit disproportionately trucks (69% of total traffic volume). A license ment to fund and implement Tier 1 projects is given on page 35. plate survey for west bound traffic is not reported. Mitigation for The Bypass is included as a component of corridor preservation future traffic impacts at intersections only considers the presence of (page 38) specific to the new alignment (this list includes projects the Bypass. not included in the Tier 1 and Tier 2 lists). A discussion on Active Transportation is provided (pages 51-56). Mention is made of the 7 Los Bonos Bicycle Plan (2006), however, bikeways are only mapped operate at lOS F. Much ofthe model of future conditions for the City of Merced. Projects and needs particular to any other anticipates development in the southwest quadrant of the City's jurisdiction are left unspecified. sphere of influence (delineated as east of Volta Road, south of Pacheco, west of Los Banos Creek, and north of Pioneer Road or the A discussion of Sustainable Communities Strategy is provided (pages San Joaquin/Kings River. Information on transit routes and use 60-64) that identifies county-wide expenditures for transit ($326 appears out of date (It reports five fixed route when only three are million) and non-motorized transportation ($110 million) under all in operation at present, and no mention of a planned transit scenarios, but does not specify allocations (For bicycle paths, these center.). The 2006 Bicycle Plan is cited. A proposed bike lane is may be included in the Merced County Regional Bicycle Transpor depicted on Figure 4-5 (pages 4-21) that follows Pacheco Blvd. west tation Plan (2008) which identifies a priority project for SR 1S2 to from the proposed bypass to where it diverges near Ramos Road create a Class II Bike lane from Mercey Springs Road (SR 16S) to the northwestwards. No pedestrian plan is mentioned. No specific Main Canal: for transit, San Joaquin Valley Express (Nelson and mention of Pacheco is made in the discussion of truck routes and Nygaard Consulting, 2009) indicates plans for a transit center in los goods movement. Banos, and a transit market from Los Banos to San Jose/Silicon Valley by 2030). 5. State Route 152 Transportation Concept Repart (2005) 4. Los Banos 2030 General Plan Circulation Element The document reports a LOS of 'B' on Pacheco Blvd. (Segment 4, Los Banos Creek to Santa Fe Grade) within Los Banos, and does not The Circulation Element, like the LBGP, describes policies and provide a future facility LOS, but reports the Bypass instead. It mitigations for traffic-related impacts to the LBGP proposed reports seven traffic signals along the route. Included is mention of population growth and land use changes. Specific information may the Los Banos Access Management Plan for SR 1S2 that was be obtained regarding the SR 152 in Los Banos. Table 4-4 (pages 4 executed in 2003. It contains no specific mention of transit, bicycle, 8) summarizes intersection operations for 2006 (Source, Omni or pedestrian projects to address needs affiliated with Pacheco Means), and provides planned improvements to the systems limited Blvd. to increasing capacity (Table 4-5), with Table 4-6 (pages 4-10) 6. Los Banos Access Management Plan (LBAMP, 2004) summarizing roadway level of service with or without the improvements. What is notable about Table 4-6 is that the roadway The LBAMP proposed a coordinated series of operational level of service without improvements appears to exceed concept improvements specific to Pacheco Blvd. and Mercey Hot Springs LOS for the facility with the exception of the portion of Pacheco Road to control traffic movement on SR 152 and SR 165 within Blvd. between Ortigalita Road and 'I' Street which is reported to the City of Los Banos. The LBAMP bases its recommendations 8 on the traffic study performed for the Bypass. The LBAMP for both highways. Uniform standards for driveway access and proposes installation of raised median barriers; several traffic interval are not provided, and are to be addressed on a case by signals beyond the six or seven that were originally present; case basis in an encroachment permit review process. converting intersections to right in, right out; creating stop The LBAMP is subject to update and revision with the updates controlled intersections on feeder streets intersecting the State of the LBGP. Based upon review, many of the proposed highways; signal synchronization; and provides design criteria improvements have yet to been performed. Planned and Programmed Projects Few projects are planned (see Table 2) for the route due to the need for an alternative alignment to meet concept LOS, design standards, and multimodal needs. Interim improvements are planned to address Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) access (Tables 3 and 4). Table 2. Planned and Programmed Projects RO.O-R 40.8 R22.3-R 25.8 From e/o Santa Fe Grade Rd. to SR-165 s/o Henry Miller Rd. los Banos Bypass Phase 1- New Four Lane Expressway 160-26.9 From Santa Clara County line to Madera County line los Banos Bypass Segment J11 - Freeway Conversion with Three Interchanges 9 Table 3. ADA Curb Ramps Needs East ofSR-1.65 Table 4. ADA Curb Ramps Needs West ofSR-1.65 Ortlgalit Marvland Avenue NE. NW Place Road (PM 21.822) SE Paradise Lane SW. SE Nickel Street SW. Sf Arizona Avenue NW. NE Entrance (PM 22.059 & PM 22.074) Mid-Block, Mid-Block Center Avenue SW, Mid-block, SE th 6 Street SW. NW. SE. NE Ninth Street NW, NE J Street NW. NE H Street Midblock. NW, NE, Midblock, NE 10 4. Multimodal Access Issues Access Strategy Access management preserves the functionality of major arterials to Overview safely move traffic at higher speeds. This can be accomplished by increasing the spacing between intersections and signals, employing Complete Streets Act {AB 1358} median treatments and turn lanes, and minimizing driveway access points. Roundabouts can also reduce conflict points and may be As cities and counties update their general plan circulation elements, AB appropriate at some intersection locations where there is adequate 1358 requires them to identify how they will provide for the routine right of way and under certain conditions. The benefits ofthese accommodation of all users of the roadway, including pedestrians, techniques include improved traffic flow, fewer points of conflict and bicyclists, individuals with disabilities, seniors and public transit users, in reduced accidents. addition to motorists. Given the available right of way and local context, and the difficulty of State Complete Streets Policy {DD-64-Rl} closing existing driveways, operational improvements are the most The California Department of Transportation (Department) provides for effective way to reduce the impact of congestion and manage the effect the needs of travelers of all ages and abilities in all planning, program of development along the frontage. There are no plans to meet the ming, design, construction, operations, and maintenance activities and concept facility by increasing capacity along the existing alignment. products on the State highway system. The Department views all Until an alternative route is constructed around the City, access transportation improvements as opportunities to improve safety, management remains the most important tool to reduce accidents and access, and mobility for all travelers in California and recognizes bicycle, conflicts points and improve traffic flow. pedestrian, and transit modes as integral elements of the transportation system. Access points along the route vary from 20 to 102 per mile (Table 5). In addition to lowering speed and increasing congestion, in general, there The Department develops integrated multimodal projects in balance is a strong relationship between the number of access points and the with community goals, plans, and values. Addressing the safety and number of crashes according to research done by the Transportation mobility needs of bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit users in all projects, Research Board (Table 6). Operation of the existing facility couid be regardless of funding, is implicit in these objectives. Bicycle, pedestrian, enhanced by exploiting all opportunities for consolidation of existing and transit travel is facilitated by creating "complete streets" beginning driveways, and the restriction or limiting of new access to help prevent early in system planning and continuing through project delivery and further deterioration. In Chapter 6, the replacement of two-way left maintenance and operations. Developing a network of "complete turn lanes with medians and providing more opportunities to make U streets" requires collaboration among all Department functional units turns is proposed to alleviate some of the conflict points. and stakeholders to establish effective partnerships. 11 Table 5. Access Points/Mile Crnsbn i1ndAccn' Dtnsity ; m g 4.1 1 <. .~ / B&". l " 18.82-19.83 Badger Flat to Iowa 22 N I 235 '~~ 1 2.V' ~. V ;.;Q. 1 1-.1 ~ , ,, 2087-21.795 10th to Nickel 32 N I 405 o 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Access PoInts per Mile l11lll.';lXllt.1:ioo R.~ ..ch B~iUd- >lc:~,~ ~1anaJ'!lIll!llt~,1m\",: :::~03 Network Mobility/Connectivity for a dedicated bike lane. Otherwise, bicycles will have to occupy a lane Map 2, on the next page, illustrates the existing bicycle, pedestrian, and as a vehicle, according to AB 1371, known as the Three Feet for Safety transit facilities serving the community along SR 152. Although Act. The law requires motor vehicle drivers passing a bicycle that is sidewalks are provided along most of the route, the area is not proceeding in the same direction to pass with no less than three feet particularly "walkable" due to the scale of commercial development between any part of the vehicle and any part of the bicycle or driver. If along a principal arterial. The existing commercial area consists of large this is not possible, the motor vehicle must slow down and pass when box stores, and even larger parking lots, as well as strip malls spread out no danger is present. A car or truck following a bicycle will further slow along the corridor. On street bus turnouts are not provided, likely due traffic operating at or near the speed limit to that of the bicycle, as to the distance of the shopping destination from the street. Transit under congested conditions, there will be little opportunity to move busses offload in the parking lots, getting passengers closer to their into another lane. destinations, relieving the need for bus stops or pullouts along the route and the resulting delay to other vehicles. Numerous signalized intersections and crosswalks allow cars, bikes and pedestrians to traverse the highway. Additional overcrossings should be While bicycle travel is not prohibited, the facility lacks the width needed provided in areas with the greatest concentration of foot traffic, to provide dedicated bike lanes. Although there are many local bike especially school routes. Although not popular with walkers because of routes, none parallels the corridor due to side street alignment. It is the extra effort reqUired to elevate above the street, ADA compliant suggested that the City provide a means to get across the town from designs have ramps that are easier to negotiate for all age groups. east to west and connect with the State highway where there is room 12 Map 2. Existing Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Transit Facilities ~ ! _",...._.._,,,,.r...... ,""._.,, .lI.t.l'J!lI'W'M~.tA'fJl:,"''''''U\ll'l):",!;". Ed'lling Pedestrian, Bicycle 3nd *E::l Tnmslt In Los Banos Traffic Generators ~ Sidewall< Present E.is~n" Tril;1 (Class 11 ExiS!'1lll Bl(:I'cll! Lllne (Class II) Exlstmg BicyCle Roule (Class II') City Streets -- Abandnr>l'l! R."I'ood C,lyL"w!s S\JDP flJrb;ln Plan l.lourXlatyl Sphere olln~""n~ :""j"' CroS5WlIlk ", Partial Crosswalk ~ Tile Bus ~ Greyhoond ""~ ". ".'"". . -Jf I 13 5. Street Design and Caltrans' Standards For State Highways, the accepted design criteria are contained in the Boulevard meets or exceeds these criteria with two exceptions: Highway Design Manual (HOM, Sixth Editian). These design criteria are shoulder width of 8 feet is desirable for bicycle lane accommodation, meant to fulfill State and federal guidelines, while fulfilling complete while the current facility only provides 3; and, the radius required for 'u' streets and active transportation policies. Table 7 below compares the turns needs to be SO feet or greater, but is less than 50 feet in most physical dimensions of Pacheco Blvd. to the highway design standards locations. laid out in the current HOM. For most of the criteria listed, Pacheco Table 7. Design Standards TWLTL Width 14' min. 14' Shoulder Width (bike lane accommodation) 8' 3' Corner Bulb~outs i1' min. NA Mid-block Pedestrian Crossing signalized None Design Speed! Speed Limit [PM 18.8-19.6, PM 21.8-22.31J 50 45 30' from traveied way FWY(FXWY, 20' HWY Roadside Trees- more than 4"dbh Various locations <35mph--18" from curb, or barrier 7 summarizes design standards and is intended to for considering roadway design options. discussion ofstandards, alternative treatments, the latest edition ofthe Highway Design Manual. 14 6. Corridor Operations and Management Overview (Minor B-Iow range), and all driveway improvements could be combined into one single project. Combining two or more intersection Proposed traffic improvements coupled with incident warning improvements along with raised median, project costs would easily rise systems are intended to improve the passage of traffic under high into the $1 Million range (Major-high range). volume conditions, or to allow efficient management of traffic under adverse conditions such as accidents or poor weather conditions. The To prioritize the operational improvements from high to low for intent is to maintain or reduce existing traffic congestion and to effectiveness and cost it is suggested that the highest priority would be improve safety conditions along the corridor until the Bypass may be signal timing adjustment to get the most benefit out of the existing completed. signal system with little to no investment. The next highest priority would be installation of raised median combined with intersection Benefits from these improvements can be measured in reductions of widening as they would have to be completed simultaneously. Finally, a travel time, fuel consumption, air pollutant emissions reduction, and consolidation of driveways would be addressed. costs to the users of the system. The specific goals are to Alexander Skabardonls presented a paper at the 80th Annual • minimize stops and delays Transportation Research Board Meeting, ITS Benefits: The Case of • minimize queue lengths Traffic Signal Contral Systems (2001), that found an estimated benefit to • provide adequate crossing time for bikes and pedestrians cost ratio of 17:1, from an evaluation of optimizing traffic signal timing • improve the reliability of interregional travel plans, coordinating traffic signal control, and implementing adaptive • reduce the impact of traffic incidents signal control at locations through the State of California. This was done Specific treatments include raised medians, limiting access, facilitating for the Fuel-Efficient Traffic Signal Management Program (FETSIM) U-turns, consolidating crosswalks, optimizing signal timing, enhancing between 1983 and 1993, and involved 163 local agencies and 334 walk-ability for all pedestrians, identifying alternate bicycle routes, and projects. Although somewhat dated, the research suggests a very incorporating appropriate ITS elements. favorable return on investment for projects of this type, as well as an average of7.7 percent drop in travel time, 13.8 percent reduction in Costs estimates for a raised median/intersection widening, if broken up delay, 12.5 percent reduction in stops, and 7.8 percent decline in fuel by intersection, would be in the range between $280,000 and $1 Million use. (Minor A-mid range). Driveway closure would likely be under $280,000 15 Proposed Improvements • On the south side (shopping center with 3 existing driveways), close westerly driveway, convert middle Roadway Design Elements driveway to right in/out, and exclude left out on easterly driveway (left in only). District 10 Office of Traffic Operations explored various proposals along SR 152, within the City, which will help improve traffic operations of 3. West I Street (PM 19.618) intersections along this route. A range of alternatives have been listed • Widen NW and SE corners to accommodate V-turns based on location and range from little or no improvement to inter • NE corner, close westerly driveway section reconstruction. Most of the proposals will help improve traffic flow by reducing the number of vehicle conflicts at intersections and 4. West I Street (PM 19.618) to driveways and maximizing signal timing throughout the segment. These Maryland Avenue (PM19.781) north side T include optimizing and coordinating traffic signal timing, modifying • Raised median with back-to-back left turns pavement striping, closing/restricting certain driveways that are redundant, unnecessary, or significantly affect traffic operations, 5. Maryland Avenue (PM19.781) north side T constructing raised medians, and intersection widening to accom • Widen NW corner to accommodate V-Turns modate u-turns. The locations and potential improvements are listed below: 6. Illinois Avenue (PM 19.970) north side T to Arizona Avenue (PM20.028) north side T 1. Between Badger Flat Road (PM 18.882) and • Raised median with back-to-back left turns Ortigalita Road (PM 19.268) • Modify the existing pavement marking in the eastbound 7. Arizona Avenue (PM20.028) north side T direction to convert the eastbound trap lane to a right • Widen NW corner to accommodate V-turns turn lane 8. Arizona Avenue (PM20.028) north side T to 2. Between Ortigalita Road (PM 19.268) and Nevada Street (PM20.090) 4 legged West I Street (PM 19.618) • Raised median with back-to-back left turns • Raised median to begin 500' east of S. Ortigalita Road (PM 19.364) and end at West I Street. 9. Nevada Street (PM 20.090) • Widen NW corner to accommodate V-turns 16 10. 4Th Street (PM 20.289) 15. Miller Lane (PM21.610) north side T • Widen SE corner to accommodate U-turns • Widen NW corner to accommodate U-turns 11. 4Th Street (PM 20.289) to 6th Street (PM 20.420) 16. Driveway approximately 400 feet west of Ward Road (PM • Raised median with back-to-back left turns 22.174) to Ward Road (PM 22.252) • Convert painted raised island to raised median, left turn 12. 6th Street (PM 20.420) into shopping center on the north, to remain, and left • Widen NW corner to accommodate U-turns turn into Rancho Drive to remain. 13. 9th Street (PM20.749) north side T 17. Ward Rd (PM 22.252) • Cul-de-sac, traffic to use J Street • Allow WB U-turns, currently they are prohibited 14. Driveway approximately 200 feet east of SR-165/152 (PM 21.385) to Miller Lane (PM21.610) • Construct raised median, left turn into shopping center on NE corner to remain 17 ....00 Signal Timing Optimization and Coordination and have less difficulty entering the roadway. Optimization and coordination of the signalized intersection helps Driveway turning movements can be restricted by replacing the existing manage the demands of vehicles and pedestrians in an optimal manner TWLTL with a raised median. Driveway restriction is a proven and and is the most cost effective way to improve traffic flow, as no effective way to reduce conflict points and can be done with minimum upgrades are necessary. in addition, signal coordination improves the disruption to existing access. Managing driveway access may cause traffic flow on a corridor by synchronizing the start of the "green light" minor inconvenience to a few vehicles, however, it will help reduce the so that a group of vehicles, or platoon, can travel together through a number of conflict points, which in turn improves traffic operations for series of signals with minimal or no stopping. This least restrictive the majority ofthe vehicles using the facility. In addition, the removal timing has the following advantages: of unnecessary driveways, especially those that are close to the influence area of an intersection and other nearby driveways, helps • Improves traffic flow through a group of signals reduce the number of decisions a driver must make. This is especially • Reduces the overall delay time at an intersection important as drivers not only need to be aware of other vehicles, but • Reduces motorist frustration by reducing stops and delay also bicyclists and pedestrians. Good access management practices will • Reduces response time for bus service and emergency vehicles help improve operational performance and improve overall safety. • Lowers air pollution/vehicular emissions Based upon the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices • Reduces gasoline consumption (CA-MUTCD, 2012 Edition), a condition for installing raised medians to Access Control and Raised Medians replace TWLTLs is when average daily traffic (ADT) exceeds 20,000 vehicles. Currently, SR 152 has a capacity at, or higher than, the In addition to signal timing optimization and coordination, there are threshold. A study conducted in La Grande, Oregon, with an average access management strategies that can significantly improve the annual daily traffic (AADT) of 17,200 (5 lanes), demonstrated that operations of the corridor. A very effective strategy consists of operations deteriorate as the driveway density increases, which in turn managing the number and location of access points that cause mainline causes the number of accidents to rise and based on the Transportation traffic flow interruption. A conflict point is described as the point at Research Board's (TRB) National Cooperative Highway Research which a roadway user can cross, merge, and diverge with another Program (NCHRP) Report 420, most studies, and the models derived roadway user. A four-legged intersection has as many as 32 conflict from them, also suggest that safety is improved where physical medians points. This number is greatly reduced by the installation of a raised replace TWLTL's. median to restrict certain ieft turn movements. With a lower number of conflict points, drivers have less trouble maneuvering through traffic 19 Raised medians have a number of advantages over TWLTLs: intersections, along with raised medians, result in improved operations and lower accident rates than TWLTLs and prohibited-left-turn • reduce the number of head on, angle, left turn and right turn corridors. crashes, as the number of conflict points are reduced • restrict certain movements into and out of driveways to CROSSWALKS improve operations Reducing the number of crosswalks per intersection on SR 152 will help • raised medians improve average speeds for through traffic and reduce conflicts and at signalized intersections will allow for more green have delays similar to TWLTL's time (approximately 30 seconds) to be allocated to vehicles. It is Driveway consolidation is another method of avoiding conflicts on the recommended that crosswalk configuration be modified at the following corridor reducing the need for drivers to slow down or stop for multiple intersections: entry points, improving overall operations and reducing deiay. On 1. West I Street (PM 19.618), existing crosswalk on all 4 sides multilane roads, speeds drop 0.25 mph per access point and speeds can be up to 10 mph lowerfor every 40 access points per mile. • Remove westerly crosswalk The removal of driveways is especially important at locations where the 2. 4Th Street (PM 20.289), existing crosswalk on all 4 sides driveway is located within the influence area of a signalized inter • Remove easterly or westerly crosswalk section. Such access points are detrimental to the operation of the signal, negatively impacting the overall intersection operation by 3. 7th St (PM 20.590) existing crosswalk on all 4 sides and disrupting traffic flow, affecting platooning and the overall pedestrian overcrossing synchronization of the signal system. As a result, the overall traffic • Remove easterly or westerly crosswalk throughput is decreased and the removal of such driveways should be a priority. The safest way to allow connectivity across the highway is with pedestrian overcrossings. These are especially prudent in areas where The implementation of raised medians is not possible without providing there are residential neighborhoods on one side of the route and U-turns at signalized intersections. Various intersections have been schools on the other such as 4th and 11th Streets. identified as good candidates for widening to accommodate U-turns for segments where raised medians have been proposed. Although a wider facility is needed to accommodate the turning vehicles, and parking areas may need to be reduced, the provision of U-turns at signalized 20 ~ t~ 2!o le ."J Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) As traffic volumes increase and congestion becomes more prevalent, comprised of a total of four CMS units, four CCTV cameras, four MVPs, the use of ITS to manage corridors becomes more important. ITS sixteen TMSs, and two RWISs for both directions. Specific locations of elements use sensing and communication to send and receive real-time these elements are to be determined during the project development information between vehicles, infrastructure, centralized transportation process, as the project scope and configurations are defined. operation and management centers. This information can be used to The benefits of implementing these ITS elements are: develop operational strategies for use on existing transportation facilities. Upgrading infrastructure can be costly and can affect the 1. to provide real-time video feedback of traffic conditions and environment, so employing ITS elements and using existing weather conditions to our Traffic Management Center (TMe) for infrastructure is a cost effective way to improve the transportation better traffic and roadway monitoring; system so that maximum benefit can be attained. ITS elements that 2. to provide real-time messaging to the travelling public traffic would be beneficial to this segment include: and weather conditions allowing system users the ability to plan accordingly to avoid incidents or congested areas, reducing • Changeable Message Signs (CMS) traffic delay or prevent secondary accidents; • Highway Advisory Radio (HAR) 3. help TMC respond to incidents and congestion more quickly and • Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) dispatch traffic management (TMT)/emergency response • 511 Service teams, or CHP to remove incident's elements from the roadway • Weather Stations to reduce potential congestion, or shorten congestion time; • Traffic Monitoring Stations (TMS) 4. and enhance the highway operations to full capacity. • Extinguishable Message Signs (EMS) • Fiber optic lines Traffic Signal System • Maintenance Vehicle Pullouts (MVP) • Roadside Weather Information System (RWIS) There are thirteen signals along SR 1S2 through Los Banos. Locations and configuration are listed in Table 8 on the next page. Only the Specifically, the Traffic Management Branch recommends two CMS th th signals at 4'h, 6 and 7 streets are coordinated. There are no fixed units, two CCTV cameras, two MVPs, eight TMSs, and one RWIS in each time signals on this corridor. All are traffic responsive. direction on the existing SR 152 corridor within Los Banos. Together, these elements make up an Automated Warning System (AWS) As noted previously, the optimization and coordination of signals is the 22 most cost effective way to improve traffic flow, reducing travel time and intersection, is also recommended to allow for expedient visual review emissions on the route. However, coordination only works when of reported signal complaints. vehicle platoons can move with minimal egress and ingress along the In the future, traffic adaptive signal timing may be considered. The City route. A signal engineer visits/observes signals at least once per year to of Stockton is currently testing a traffic-adaptive control system through ensure that the signal timing plans are reflective of current traffic a grant from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) on select conditions. At the present time, it appears that there is no consistent corridors in the City. The pilot study will determine whether the congestion occurring and public complaints are minimal. investment confers appreciable benefits to the corridor under study. Signal timing has been optimized as much as possible through the Traffic-adaptive systems look to be the future for signal control but are corridor, given the existing equipment. In order to maintain currently not an option that Caltrans has at its disposal. The system is performance, it is essential that all signal loops are working so that very costly, uses proprietary software, and must be integrated with signal controllers can properly detect vehicles. loop failure due to Caltrans-developed signal timing software. various causes is a ongoing problem in many areas. An option may be to utilize ACS lite, a scaled down version of FHWA's Interconnecting the signals via hard-wire/fiber-optic or through a ACS software, designed to monitor and evaluate traffic conditions and wireless methods, allows the controllers to synch their clocks provide refinements to signal timing on a cycle by cycle basis; and is automatically, as the clocks on the signal controllers have a tendency to intended to be the low cost solution that adjusts traffic signal timing for drift over time leading to the coordinated signals getting out of synch. It real-time traffic conditions in small to medium sized communities. will cost approximately $15 per foot to install signal interconnect cable Synchronizing the corridor will help achieve better traffic flow. between adjacent signals along the corridor plus another $5,000 in However, signal timing can only do so much. Operational improve State-furnished parts to complete. ments recommended by Traffic Operations and Traffic Safety are In addition, extending system communication to the intersections via essential to enhanced performance. As stated above, "...modifying wireless modem or DSl, at a cost of $1,000 to $3,000 per location, pavement striping, closing/restricting certain driveways that are allows remote trouble shooting of signal timing issues, enhancing signal redundant, unnecessary, or significantly affect traffic operations, functionality and reliability. Installing cameras and communication constructing raised medians and widening to accommodate u-turns," equipment at each intersection, at a cost of approximately $9,000 per are needed in addition to signal timing to improve traffic flow. 23 Table 8. Signals and Controller Types 1 MER 152 17.790 CdllegeEntrance 2070 Loops 2 MER 152 18.800 Badger Flat Road 2070 Loops 3 MER 152 19.260 Ortigalita Road 2070 Loops 4 MER 152 19650 West I Street 2070 Loops 5 MER 152 20.330 4th Street 170 Loops 6 MER 152 204S0 6th Street 170 Loops 7 MER 152 20.590 7th Street 170 Loops 8 MER 152 21.058 H Street and I Street 2070 Loops 9 MER 152 21.270 Mercy Springs Road 170 Loops 10 MER 152 21.650 Miller Lane 170 Loops 11 MER 152 21.760 Place Road 170 Loops 12 MER 152 21950 Home Depot 170 Loops 13 MER 152 22.220 Ward Road 170 Loops ITS ELEMENTS It is recommended to deploy the following ITS elements on SR 152 and 2. Install eleven Traffic Monitoring Stations (TMS) at half mile SR 165 in order to improve mobility and safely by reducing traveler intervals on SR 152 within the limits of the City of Los Banos. delay, improving travel time reliability and reducing collisions: The stations will be used to automate the proposed CMSs via the Caltrans Automated Warning System (CAWS), collect 1. Install two Type 500 Changeable Message Signs (CMS) for valuable traffic volume data for the Traffic Census program, and eastbound and westbound traffic. The CMS units should be report speed data to the Performance Measurement System placed strategically approximately Y, mile outside the City limits (PeMS). to take advantage of detour options in case of incidents. The system will advise motorists of traffic and weather conditions 3. Install a Roadside Weather Information System (RWIS) which that might affect their trip in advance of any unfavorable utilizes meteorological measurement sensors to detect corridor traffic conditions within the City. conditions such as fog, rain and wind. The RWIS will use this 24 information to automatically trigger the CMSs, through CAWS, TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT to warn motorists of adverse weather conditions. The proposed ITS elements in this corridor will significantiy enhance 4. Install a complete Highway Advisory Radio (HAR) system which transportation system operations efficiency and improve mobility. Real will include a HAR located at the junction of SR 152 and SR 165 time speed and weather information collected via ITS elements is and four Extinguishable Message Signs (EMS). Two EMS units processed by Performance Measurements Systems and Intelligent will be installed on SR 152, one for eastbound traffic, west of Roadway Information System. This information is used to automatically the junction, and one for westbound traffic east of the junction activate Changeable Message Signs to provide motorists with roadway and two EMS units will be installed on SR 165, one for and travel information. This will assist with incident management or northbound traffic south of the junction, and one for direct traffic to alternative routes when needed. In addition, ITS southbound traffic north ofthe junction. elements provide TMC operators with valuable information to 5. Install five Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) cameras at one mile immediately dispatch the appropriate response from maintenance intervals on SR 152. The CCTV cameras will provide real-time crews, TMT, emergency response teams, and/or the CHP. feedback to Traffic Management Center (TMe) operators to For traffic management purposes, the specific recommendations are to visually verify incidents detected through TMSs and reported by install two CMSs, two CCTV cameras, two maintenance vehicle pullouts CHP or other sources, and monitor the congestion queue (MVPs), eight TMSs, and one RWIS in each direction on the existing SR development during incident management. The CCTV cameras 152. The combination of these elements is called an Automated reduce the time that the TMC operators require to verify an Warning System (AWS). AWSs are intended to be utilized during the pre incident and best determine/dispatch the type of response and post bypass build-out for the purposes of building an integrated needed. smart highway system so that the highway system will ultimately 6. Upgrade thirteen existing signals to current District 10 function as a unit to improve traffic operations to full use or at full standard. It s also recommended to repair damaged loop capacity, utilizing the newest ITS devices currently available. detectors, install Type 2070 controllers, add CCTV cameras for surveillance, install interconnect cables between signals for This requires a total of four CMSs. four CCTV cameras, four MVPs, coordination and install adaptive system, when approved for sixteen TMSs, and two RWISs for both directions. Specific locations of use. these elements are to be determined during the project development 25 processes when project scope and configuration are defined. For the elements mentioned previously in this study, the estimates are: The benefits of implementing these ITS elements are: • 1 HAR = $75,000 • 4 EMS = $100,000 1. to provide real-time video feedback of traffic and weather conditions to our TMC for better traffic and roadway monitoring; TRAFFIC SAFETY 2. to provide real-time messaging to the travelling public of traffic The latest five year collision history showed that the predominant type and weather conditions so that drivers can plan accordingly to of collisions were rear-ends followed by broadsides. Traffic avoid incidents or congested areas, reducing traffic delay, and investigations identified speeding as the leading primary collision factor preventing secondary accidents; for the rear-end collisions while failing to yield is identified for the broadsides. Congestion was cited as a contributing factor to the rear 3. to heip the TMC evaluate and respond to incidents and end collisions. Latest safety and operational improvements included congestion events quickly to dispatch CHP, traffic management installation of traffic signals at the intersection with H and I Streets, and or emergency response teams to remove incident's elements at the intersection with Miller Lane; and installation of high visibility from the roadway, averting potential congestion or reducing crosswalk markings with warning signs for pedestrians. congestion time; and It is anticipated that the proposed operational improvements for traffic 4. enhance highway operations to full capacity. flow will reduce the number of collisions by reducing the number of Estimated total cost of the improvements would be about $2 million conflict points and need for drivers to make quick stops. Also, increased broken down as follows: speed limit enforcement would help in reducing not only rear-end collisions but other types as well. • 4 CMS units (MVPs included) = $1.2 million • 4 CCTV Cameras = $80,000 • 16 TMS = $400,000 • 2 RWIS = $150,000 26 INCIDENT RESPONSE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT COMPLIANCE The Los Banos Police Department handles emergency response issues The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, along with its on SR 1S2 through the City. If additional response is needed from implementing regulations, and the California Government Code Sections Caltrans, such as a maintenance crew to clean up a hazardous material 44S0 et seq, prescribe that facilities shall be made accessible to persons spill, the Police Department will contact the District 10 TMC for with disabilities. A multimodal roadway network should be able to assistance. accommodate pedestrians and is especially important that access is provided to persons with disabilities. During an incident, once the scope and cause ofthe incident is determined, a response can be designed and initiated. CCTV can alert Existing ADA deficiencies or access barriers are identified in the State's the TMC to the problem and help in determine an appropriate ADA Transition Plan or recognized through the grievance process. response. Other ITS elements can alert motorists to avoid the area. The Access barriers include existing curb ramps lacking a level maneuvering proposed ITS system improvements work to inform Caltrans of the area or landing, ramps or landings missing a detectable warning surface, severity of the event, plan a proper response, clear the accident and any ramp grades exceeding 8.33%. Also included are sidewalks and residual material quickly, warn driver's of dangerous conditions and driveways which exceed the 2% cross slope required along the avoidance maneuvers, and to prevent additional accidents. In general, pedestrian path. Signalized intersections need Accessible Pedestrian the system improves the response time, closing out the incident safely Signals (APS) which enable pedestrians who are blind or visually and rapidly. impaired to safely cross the intersections. All sidewalks and curb ramps must be designed in compliance with state and federal accessibility standards. Minimum sidewalk clear widths should be free of utilities, furniture, signs and all other obstructions. It is recommended to upgrade the pedestrian facilities along this highway to current ADA standards. 27 7. Needs Assessment and Implementation Overview Critical Needs The City has identified a number of challenges associated with the SR As discussed previously in the document, ways to decrease congestion 152 corridor. Congestion, truck traffic, accidents, and pedestrian need to be implemented in order to facilitate movement both through crossings are the major issues at this time and operations will only the City and in and out of major destinations along, or near, the route. deteriorate in the future. This must be accomplished while allOWing pedestrians to move safely across the street. Bicycles will need to be accommodated with a No projects are in the pipeline to address these issues or increase separate facility, as room for a dedicated lane is not available. capacity ofthe route. The Bypass was planned to provide for the increases in interregional traffic and truck movements that could not be Traffic volumes above 20,000 ADT warrant the use of a median rather accommodated in the amount of right of way available through the City than a TWlTl to restrict turning traffic to intersections. A median island on Pacheco Blvd .. The alternative route would leave the existing would make it easierfor pedestrians to cross as well, as would corridor a friendlier place for local residents and shoppers to access by pedestrian overcrossings. The number of access points along the route car, bike or foot. add to the congestion creating conflicting movements and slowing traffic. Some combination of closing unnecessary driveways and While this study has suggested a number of improvements to address consolidating adjacent driveways should be considered, as well as these issues, the planning analysis was performed at a very high level, carefully planning new access for future developments. considering the number of intersections, driveways, traffic volume, conflicting movements, and concerns relayed by the City. To move Although outside the boundaries of this study, non-motorized access to forward, improvements will need to be further refined by additional the Community College should be provided. There is no continuous analysis and modeling and stakeholders input will be needed to further sidewalk leading to the entrance and those on foot have to walk on the define the problem and determine achievable solutions. dirt shoulder. 28 Funding Raised median/intersection widening, if broken up by intersection, When a funding source is offered, projects that are planned and ready would be in the range between $280,000 and $1 Million (Minor A- mid to go generally have a better chance of award. To that end, this study is range). Driveway closure would be in the low range, under $280,000 an important first step in funding needed improvements, identifying (Minor B)-all driveway improvements could be combined into one single feasible candidate projects, reaching agreement with stakeholders, project. To combine two or more intersection improvements along with pursuing funding sources, and outlining basic needs for further raised median, the project would easily rise above the $1 Million range evaluation. (Major - high range). Table 9 gives a rough estimate of the individual project cost and the possible funding source. Projects can be programmed through grants, local general or specific funds, federal, State, or regional funds, depending on availability. Driveway closure or consolidation could be accomplished through a public/private partnership. 29 Table 9. Possible Funding Sources Badger Flat Rd (PM 18882) . Modify pavement marking to convert the EB 1 $lS,OOO Caltrans SHOPP Ortrgalita Rd (PM 19268) trao lane to a RTL 2 $600,000 C"ltrans/Local 5HOPP/CMAQ a. Widen NW and SE corners to accommodate 3 West I Street (PM 19.6181 U-turns $425,000 Caltrans/Local SHOPP/CMAO b. NE corner, close W. OW 4 S Maryland Ave.(PM19.781) N. side T W'lden NW corner to accommodate U-Turns $lS0,OOO Caltrons/local SHOPP/CMAQ 6 7 Arizona Ave. (PM20.028)N. side T Widen NW corner to accommodate U~turns $lS0,OOO Caltrcms/Local SHOPP/CMAQ Arizona Ave.(PM20.028) N, side T 8 Nevada St,(PM20,090) 4 legged 9 Nevada St (PM 20090) Widen NW corner to accommodate U~turns $150,000 Caitrans/Loca! SHOPP/CMAQ 10 4,h St. (PM 20.289) to 11 Raised median with back-to-back left turns $275,000 Caltrans/local 5HOPP/CMAQ 6" St. (PM 20.420) 12 6th 5treet (PM 20.420) 30 13 9'" Street (PM20.749) N, side T Cul-de-sac, traffic to use J St. $300,000 Caltrans/Loca! SHOPP/CMAQ 15 Miller Ln, (PM21.610j N, side T Widen NW cornerta accommodate U-turns $200,000' Caltrans/Local SHOPP/CMAQ Allow W8 U-turns, currently they are 17 Ward Rd (PM 22,252) $7,500 Caltrans/Local SHOPP/CMAQ prohibited Install Accessible Pedestrian 19 ADA Caltrans SHOPP Signal -- ,~--- "",--,,------i'Signa!i7ed intersection, minor signal modification will be required Prioritization and Implementation From an engineering perspective, the highest priority improvement These proposals would satisfy the goal of improving operations with would be signal timing adjustment in order to get the most out of the increasing cost of implementation, both in terms of dollars spent and existing signal system with little to no investment. The second phase of inconvenience experienced by the residents and businesses. projects would entail the installation of a raised median combined with As each proposal has different costs and benefits to stakeholders, the intersection Widening, at a significantly higher cost. Many ofthese City will be holding a public meeting to discuss the suggested projects would have to be completed simultaneously. For example, improvements, identify any other critical needs, the issues to consider, putting in a median would require a lTl and V-turn capability at an the costs involved, and the comments ofthe attendees. The outcome intersection, involving additional right of way and possible driveway of the meeting will determine the final decision on how to proceed. relocation, The final phase would be the consolidation of driveways, 31 LOS Banos oj' Agenda Staff ReRQ!! TO: Mayor &City Council Members '. FROM: Mark Fachin, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer'I!);7Q.,j~ '1~~v>~ DATE: August 19, 2015 SUBJECT: Chromium 6 Update TYPE OF REPORT: Informational Item Recommendation: Informational item only, no action to be taken. Discussion: There will be a brief presentation regarding an update on Chromium 6. Reviewed by: Hexavalent Chromium - Chromium 6 -eB~!}~Jf!{~~G~1 set at 0.02 ppb (parts per billion) in July 2011 Maximum Contaminant level (MCl) set at 10 ppb in July 2014 All City wells exceed new Chromium 6 MCl Background • Prior standard - total Chromium level of 50 ppb; twice the national standard • Both standards are in effect Water Quality is the same the standard has changed Timeline !~~!~"1~"-P~~IiCHealth goal set at 0.02 ppb • August 22,2013 - CDPH proposes a Maximum rr1~~na~t..evel {MCl) of 10 ppb '~Oer9; 2013 -City interviews Consultant ~~eI'1~'i2013 -City hires Consultant ctober 3, 2013 - City staff and Assemblyman Adam Gray meet to discussion impact of standard Timeline ctober 24, 2013 - Evaluation report complete • October 31, 2013 - City staff and Assemblyman Adam Gray meet to review evaluation report • December 5, 2013 - City staff and Consultant meet with Adam Grays' staff, California Department of Public Health, California Regional Water Quality Control Board Timeline nuary 13, 2014 - City staff met with District Engineer from the California Department of Public Health to review possible action mI~ ~:I!Bll~~fiO~a~-'iA)~A seminar in Davis .~:~'~~:20~4-AWWA seminar in Gilroy ril17, 2014 - City submits funding request to State Timeline , I m I• June 5, 2014 - City meets with IONEX to set up IONEX Pilot Testing • June 9to July 11, 2014 - IONEX performs pilot testing on well #14 July 1, 2014 - MCl standard of 10 ppb becomes effective uly 14, 2014 - City meets with State Water II Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Iy 31 to September 3, 2014 -IONEX performs pilot testing on well #9 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,\,.~,,.,,,.,,",,;,,,,,,,., ..,,,,,,,.,,,',~,,,,,,~,,,""""",,,,,,,,,.;w;,,,,,.·~'ili,,,,,;i",,."",,,~·,;,,,;~,"'" ,i,", ;"~""""~'""~·;",; ..__ ._u"·.";;;"",,,,·,,,,,";~,,·"·«~,,,~,'"~'''''''"'~·.~\·.m,,'';"W.;'';;'~·~' =~''"~_~''~·''''''''·~'''''''''=~"""""'~~';""~",_m_~_~_'_~ ._...__ ...._._____ . __._ Timeline ctober 2to October 29, 2014 -IONEX :~~t=~:;1~i1gt;teSting on well #7 ecember 11, 2014 - City well samples are ~~4~~ete1mine Chromium 6 ppb levels anuary 2015 - Preliminary funding application submitted to State for all 13 wells through I I the State Revolving Fund I II- January 9, 2015 - City meets with IONEX to discuss pilot testing results Timeline II"JfjM~16;201S-Conference call with State ! .·.··········\\·············.·.···Water••• ····· I '~~~~~?~G~:S -Submitted Chromium 6 Public Notification draft to SWRCB II· March 17,2015- Discussed preliminary funding r!I~Ga~i~nand)process March 18, 2015 - BSK quarterly samples of all II ~i~\we"S'\fonChromium 6 11~.~!!!~~::~Ail'weIlS tested for Title 22 Investigation per consultant request Timeline pril 3, 2015 - Meeting with Evoque about ~r~i~:\'6~re~ment pril 21, 2015 - Meeting with Tonka Water about Chromium 6treatment pril24, 2015 - Conference call with SWRCB ~~~~'Il~lllicmnpliance from 1st quarter ~~~~h\; pril28, 2015 -..•...Received Compliance order No. 03·11·15R·003 from SWRCB Timeline une 3, 2015· Quarterly Chromium 6 sampling at all wells une 23, 2015 - Meeting with Provost and Pritchard to discuss Chromium 6 occurrence uly 5, 2015 - Public Notification in July 5th billing cycle uly 8, 2015 - All wells tested for Title 22 Investigation per consultant request l'imeline --- .. July 15,2015 - Discussed Chromium 6 treatment with North American Hoganas Inc. I - zero valent iron based media ·.mff:~:'~~~!s,~- A'Pproved work order to further ~!:~~i9~t~$Ources ofChromium 6 .. July 29-31, 2015 - Consultant conducted site visit to North American Hoganas Inc. to review new treatment technology "."""""""",,,,,,,,,-,,-,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,~,,~,,,,,,,,--,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-,,~~-_.""----"- I ,,,"""""""" """""""""',,,,",,,,,,",," """'"'''''''''''' ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''""''''",,,,''M'''''''''''''''' "'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''"w"""."""""."""""""" ."" -" ---- _. Future Timeline August 31, 2015 - Corrective Action Plan to be submitted to SWRCB for their review eep processing funding application for planning • ntinue Quarterly Monitoring and public notification Future Timeline erform timely elements on approved Corrective Action Plan bmit a report every three months showing action taken in order to comply with the rective Action Plan '>""""""'·~''''·'~''''ti"·;.;,.,"~"";,,~,,~,",,,,''''''''',''n.<,~;i,, ...,~,,,c,,,,,,,,,",,,,,,~""~·~"'''';,"' __~';~''''''''',,"'''''i;,,'''=i~·.~m·,,,;"",";~,;,,,~~,"",-,,,,,,~.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,·~~w.'~"';u·''''~,w.~·~m'''~,~·=,~";.~~~,~.~·""~",.","""";,="""=.. ,,=·~u~·,".=,,,,,~,,,,,~'''_;~'~~~_'~<''~_'''"~~'~'M ..._" " ...u..... _ Corrective Action Plan ~T~lI~ttted'tQSWRCBby August 31,2015, r_Alt"I~L~;J,~~!r:~pprQ'lal • To conform to Directives as outlined in ~L~li~~eIQrderNQ. 03·11·15R·003 rocess planning funding applications c: 0 (L) c: --+-' +-'ra 0 ra =res --+-' :::::s ~ -c ra ~ c: C) -ra 0 --+-' (L)> =0 --+-' fA (L) (L) (L) -""'"~ v -Q. >c: ~ -- :::::s < E 0 Q) 0 -ra C) fA :> u u s:::: a- -""'"~ -c --C) -- (L) v (L) --- +-' Q) +-' 0 a- t ra ...... -0 -c ~ 0 E ~ (L) 0 C) -(L) (L) --+-' U fA N ~ u (L) .. e +-' ~ ...... -c fA I ~ ~ (L) :::::s +-' .s:::: +-' fA - fA :::::s • • C) ..c ...... Q) m -c =tt1 ....-l c: c: ~ 0 m .-...... -a.. =0 Q) ...... ""'" -Q. Q) v ...... E U) < 0 m Q) (.) :> :E .""", -c ..... Q) >. v -Q. Q) ~ 0 N Q. t E 0 ::1 0 --...... N en U) ... U Q) .... ""'"M ...... Q) I .... m - .c(L) 3: -CD E U) Q) • m (.) .c (L) Q.. C Corrective Action Plan ~~- est'lmated complet'lon date .'''I:~~j~022 a. Rate Study dopt Rates ''''F~!:~t~a~Em~programmatic Environmental Impact Report (EIR) • Design Corrective Action Plan li~t::timated~omPletiondate N1a~~a~~~2~~5 .. ~~~~~it~constmctionfunding application ~!!~~~~mc:~mprOJ1ements c. Water system in Chromium 6 MLC compliance • after 4 quarters of monitoring LOS Banos n n = COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Date: August 14, 2015 Regarding: Notice of Public Hearing Proposal: Site Plan Review #2015-03 - Eakins Properties NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT a Public Hearing will be held by the Los Banos Planning Commission to consider Site Plan Review #2015-03 for Eakins Properties. The project proposal is for the development of a 5,000 square foot industrial warehouse. The project site is located within the Industrial zoning district in what is known as the Pacheco Pass Commerce Center on Commerce Way off of Willmott Avenue; more specifically described as Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 081-200-008 and 009. A PUBLIC HEARING on this matter will be held at the next scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission on Wednesday, August 26, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Los Banos City Hall located at 520 "J" Street. Questions regarding the above-referenced item may be directed to Stacy Souza Elms, Senior Planner at City Hall or at (209) 827-7000, Ext. 133. Persons wishing to provide oral comments on the described proposal may do so at this meeting or may provide written comments on this matter prior to the public meeting. Written comments may be sent by U.S. Mail or hand delievered to the City of Los Banos City Hall at 520 "J" Street, Los Banos, California 93635. If no comments are received prior to or on the above date, it will be assumed that no comments are being offered. The public is also informed that should this matter, at some future date go to court, court testimony is limited to only those issues raised at the hearings per Government Code Section 65009. THE CITY OF LOS BANOS etJSJ~~ Senior Planner LOS Banos If the (n'sslow!s ofCuliforniil & & COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Date: August 14, 2015 Regarding: Notice of Public Hearing Proposal: Conditional Use Permit #2015-09 - Type 41 Alcohol License NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT a Public Hearing will be held by the Los Banos Planning Commission to consider a Conditional Use Permit to allow the use of a Type 41 Alcohol License for the on-sale of beer and wine in conjunction with an eating establishment. The requested Conditional Use Permit is for J & N Restaurant located at 933 Sixth Street, Suite B, more specifically described as Assessor's Parcel Number: 025-241-013. A PUBLIC HEARING on this matter will be held at the next scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission to consider a recommendation to the Los Banos City Council on Wednesday, August 26,2015 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Los Banos City Hall located at 520 "J" Street. Questions regarding the above-referenced item may be directed to Stacy Souza Elms, Senior Planner at City Hall or at (209) 827-7000, Ext. 133. Persons wishing to provide oral comments on the proposed project may do so at this meeting or may provide written comments on this matter prior to the public meeting. Written comments may be sent by U.S. Mail or hand delivered to the City of Los Banos City Hall at 520 "J" Street, Los Banos, California 93635. Please be advised that should this matter, at some future date go to court, testimony shall be limited to only those issues raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City prior to, or at, the public hearing per Government Code Section 65009. THE CITY OF LOS BANOS LOS Banos a a COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Date: August 14, 2015 Regarding: Notice of Public Hearing Proposal: Mobile Vendor Permit #2015-03 - EI Grullense, Jal NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT a Public Hearing will be held by the Los Banos Planning Commission to consider Mobile Vendor Permit #2015-03 to allow the operation of a mobile trailer to vend on private property located at 1725 W. Pacheco Blvd.; more specifically identified as Assessor's Parcel Number: 430-010-004. The applicant is Leo Oliva, dba: EI Grullense, Jal. A PUBLIC HEARING on this matter will be held at the next scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission on Wednesday, August 26, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Los Banos City Hall located at 520 "J" Street. Questions regarding the above-referenced item may be directed to Stacy Souza Elms, Senior Planner at City Hall or at (209) 827-7000, Ext. 133. Persons wishing to provide oral comments on the proposed project may do so at this meeting or may provide written comments on this matter prior to the public meeting. Written comments may be sent by U.S. Mail or hand delivered to the City of Los Banos City Hall at 520 "J" Street, Los Banos, California 93635. Please be advised that should the action by the City Council be challenged in court, you may be limited to only those issues raised at the hearings or by written comment per Government Code Section 65009. THE CITY OF LOS BANOS ~gks Stacy Souza Elms Senior Planner LOS Banos .11 the Crossroads of Culi{ornia £ L£ COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Date: August 14, 2015 Regarding: Notice of Public Hearing Proposal: Proposed Ordinance - Temporary Uses NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT a Public Hearing will be held by the Los Banos Planning Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the Los Banos City Council to adopt a proposed ordinance to regulate and create a process for Temporary Uses on private (non-residential) property in the City of Los Banos. A PUBLIC HEARING on this matter will be held at the next scheduled meeting of the Los Banos Planning Commission on Wednesday, August 26,2015 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Los Banos City Hall located at 520 "J" Street. Questions regarding the above-referenced item may be directed to Stacy Souza Elms, Senior Planner, at City Hall or at (209) 827-7000, Ext.133. Persons wishing to provide oral comments on the described proposal may do so at this meeting or may provide written comments on this matter prior to the public meeting. Written comments may be sent by U.S. Mail or hand delivered to the City of Los Banos City Hall at 520 "J" Street, Los Banos, California 93635. If no comments are received prior to or on the above date, it will be assumed that no comments are being offered. The public is also informed that should this matter, at some future date go to court, court testimony is limited to only those issues raised at the hearings per Government Code Section 65009. THE CITY OF LOS BANOS ~~ Senior Planner