Lion Hunting Behaviour and Vegetation Structure in an African Savanna

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lion Hunting Behaviour and Vegetation Structure in an African Savanna Lion hunting behaviour and vegetation structure in an African savanna a,* b,c,1 a,2 Scott R. Loarie , Craig J. Tambling , Gregory P. Asner a Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA, U.S.A. b Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa c Centre for African Conservation Ecology, Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa Emerging evidence suggests that male lions are not dependent on female’s hunting skills but are in fact successful hunters. But difficulty locating kills and objectively characterizing landscapes has complicated the comparison of male and female lion hunting strategies. We used airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) measurements of vegetation structure in Kruger National Park, combined with global positioning system (GPS) telemetry data on lion, Panthera leo, kills to quantify lines-of-sight where lion kills occurred compared with areas where lions rested, while controlling for time of day. We found significant differences in use of vegetation structure by male and female lions during hunts. While male lions killed in landscapes with much shorter lines- of-sight (16.2 m) than those in which they rested, there were no significant differences for female lions. These results were consistent across sizes of prey species. The influence of vegetation structure in shaping predatoreprey interactions is often hypothe-sized, but quantitative evidence has been scarce. Although our sample sizes were limited, our results provide a mechanism, ambush hunting versus social hunting in the open, to explain why hunting success of male lions might equal that of females. This study serves as a case study for more complete studies with larger samples sizes and illustrates how LiDAR and GPS telemetry can be used to provide new insight into lion hunting behaviour. Keywords: Bayesian statistics Carnegie Airborne Observatory GPS telemetry LiDAR lion Panthera leo predatoreprey interaction vegetation structure With large mammals increasingly confined to protected areas Sustaining predatoreprey interactions within these protected (Ceballos et al. 2005; Karanth et al. 2010), understanding how to areas will require a better understanding of how spatial heteroge- maintain landscape-scale ecological processes that support diverse neity influences predation strategies. Several recent studies have mammal communities within reserve boundaries is a critical con- begun to explore the role of spatial heterogeneity in shaping the servation priority (Woodroffe & Ginsberg 1998; Bengtsson et al. distribution of predatoreprey interactions across landscapes 2003; Berger 2004; van Aarde & Jackson 2007; Loarie et al. 2009a, (Hopcraft et al. 2005; Valeix et al. 2009). For example, the decline of b). Sustainable predatoreprey interactions exemplify con-ditions roan, Hippotragus equinus, and other antelope that tolerate sparse that are difficult to achieve within protected areas (Sinclair et al. surface water to avoid high predator densities has been partially 2003, 2008; Tambling & Du Toit 2005; Ripple & Beschta 2006; attributed to lions following water-dependent antelope into arid Hayward & Somers 2009). Pressure to offer charismatic viewing landscapes after the construction of waterholes (Grant et al. 2007; opportunities to tourists (Hutton & Leader-Williams 2003; Lindsey Hayward et al. 2007). How spatial heterogeneity in vegetation et al. 2007) has led many small reserves to reintroduce lions, Pan- structure influences predatoreprey interactions is less well un- thera leo, as exemplified by Slotow & Hunter’s (2009) study of lion derstood. Several studies suggest that predator ambush opportu- introductions into 37 small reserves across South Africa. Despite nities provided by vegetation structure could shape the being indigenous to most of these reserves, lions are returning to distribution and foraging behaviour of herbivores across a very different landscapes, namely those that are increasingly being landscape, but quantitative data are scarce (Hopcraft et al. 2005; fenced and fragmented with altered hydrological and fire regimes Fischhoff et al. 2007; Valeix et al. 2009). Such interactions between (Loarie et al. 2009a). vegetation structure and predation would be significant because vegetation structure is readily manipulated by park managers through fire, elephant, Loxodonta africana, exclusion and other * Correspondence: S. R. Loarie, Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institu- controls (Asner et al. 2009; Levick et al. 2009). Understanding tion for Science, 260 Panama Street, Stanford, CA 94305, U.S.A. possible feedbacks between vegetation structure and predation E-mail address: [email protected] (S. R. Loarie). 1 E-mail address: [email protected] (C. J. Tambling). success may elucidate both unintended consequences of and 2 E-mail address: [email protected] (G. P. Asner). opportunities arising from management activities. 1 Testing for the influence of vegetation structure on predatore the remotely accessed movement data from the GPS collars, clus- prey interactions has been complicated by two factors. First, most ters of GPS positions where lions were stationary for more than 2 h studies locate predation sites by following predators that are were identified as potential resting or kill sites. GPS clusters were difficult to observe in dense vegetation (Funston et al. 2001), investigated on foot to determine the activity at each GPS cluster especially at night when most hunting occurs (Mills & Biggs 1993), (Tambling et al. 2010). and thus, are potentially biased by sampling along roads and in the We identified kills by the presence of stomach contents that presence of observers. We apply global position sys-tem (GPS) were usually accompanied by carcass remains (bones, hair, horns telemetry for an unbiased sampling of predator loca-tions across or teeth). The stomach contents were chosen as diagnostic of the heterogeneous landscapes. Second, vegetation structure influences kill site because, while lions may move the carcass from the kill site ambush opportunities through the local viewshed (i.e. the (Schaller 1972), at Kruger, the stomach contents are almost always distance travelled by lines-of-sight from a location before they deposited within a few metres of the kill site (P. Funston, personal become obstructed). Because viewsheds are difficult to communication). This explains why stomach contents were occa- quantitatively measure in the field, ad hoc data on shrub and grass sionally separated from other carcass remains. Although we cover are used as proxies for lines-of-sight. Alternatively, assumed that the stomach content location was the site where the vegetation has been ignored, with viewsheds characterized only kill was made, we accommodated potential movement of the car- from coarse topographic features such as rock kopjes and canyons cass (before the stomach contents were emptied) in our analysis by (Hopcraft et al. 2005). We used LiDAR data to model how propagating a 10 m radius around the location. vegetation structure and other fine-scale landscape structures If no stomach contents or other carcass remains were found, we shape viewsheds consistently and objectively across the study area. assumed the lions were resting in unfavourable conditions to ini- tiate a hunt or perhaps recovering from a failed hunting attempt. To Lions are of particular interest because of their strong sexual minimize the incidence of failing to detect carcass remains, and dimorphism in both appearance and behaviour. Although male thereby misidentify kill locations as resting locations, we restricted lions were generally thought to be less accomplished hunters than our analysis to clusters checked within 16 weeks of their occur- females (Scheel & Packer 1991; Stander 1992), recent research rence. After this period of time, success in detecting kills decreases suggests that males successfully kill as frequently as females (Tambling et al. 2010). (Funston et al. 2001). Funston et al. (2001) found that prey species largely explained differences between male and female hunting LiDAR Data behaviour. These authors found no consistent influence of vegeta- tion structure, probably because of the difficulties of monitoring We mapped 100 km2 in the Satara region of KNP with the Car- lion hunting behaviour, as mentioned above. negie Airborne Observatory (CAO) (Asner et al. 2007), an integrated Here, we combined fine-scale airborne Light Detection and LiDAR and hyperspectral system, in April/May 2008. The CAO LiDAR Ranging (LiDAR) measurements with locations of lion predation subsystem provides three-dimensional structural information of events from Kruger National Park (KNP) in South Africa. From these vegetation canopies and the underlying terrain surface. The GPS-IMU data, we formulated a probabilistic model to quantify how vege- subsystem provides three-dimensional position and orientation data tation structure shapes the viewsheds used by the lions. Impor- for the CAO sensors, allowing for highly precise and accurate pro- tantly, our Bayesian framework allowed us to propagate jection of LiDAR observations on the ground. For this study, the CAO uncertainty from lines-of-sight to viewsheds and to consider the datawere collected from 2000 m above ground level, providing maps impact of sample size. We then tested for the influence of lion sex, of ground elevation, woody canopy height and three-dimensional lion hunting or
Recommended publications
  • Report on Lion Conservation, 2016
    Report on Lion Conservation with Particular Respect to the Issue of Trophy Hunting AreportpreparedbyProfessor David W. Macdonald CBE, FRSE, DSc⇤ tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Director of WildCRU, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt at the request of Rory Stewart OBE ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Under Secretary of State for the Environment tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt 28 November 2016 ⇤[email protected] Lion Conservation and Trophy Hunting Report Macdonald et al. Contributors TTT This report was prepared with the assistance of members of the Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, of which the core team was Dr Amy Dickman, Dr Andrew Loveridge, Mr Kim Jacobsen, Dr Paul Johnson, Dr Christopher O’Kane and..Dr Byron du Preez, supported by Dr Kristina Kesch and Ms Laura Perry. It benefitted from critical review by: TTTDr Guillaume Chapron TTTDr Peter Lindsey TTTProfessor Craig Packer It also benefitted from helpful input from: TTTDr Hans Bauer TTTProfessor Claudio Sillero TTTDr Christiaan Winterbach TTTProfessor John Vucetich Under the aegis of DEFRA the report
    [Show full text]
  • Art and Imperialism in the Ancient Near East Prof. Marian Feldman, History of Art and Near Eastern Studies, UCB
    Art and Imperialism in the Ancient Near East Prof. Marian Feldman, History of Art and Near Eastern Studies, UCB. http://orias.berkeley.edu/summer2010/Summer2010Home.htm Summarized by Timothy Doran Art in the form of figurative imagery and architectural and monumental construction has long played a central role in imperialism. Some of the earliest known empires of the ancient world – namely, the Akkadian, Old Babylonian, Neo-Assyrian, and Achaemenid Persian – communicated a harmonious, hierarchic worldview of authority and order in which the present power structure was portrayed as proper, natural, and beneficial. An imperial vision was shaped by monuments and architecture of each period: the Warka Vase from the Late Uruk period, the Victory Stele of Naram-Sin, the Law Code Stele of Hammurabi, the lion hunt reliefs of Ashurbanipal, and the wall reliefs of the audience hall in the city of Persepolis. The region’s environment constrained the development of power. The Fertile Crescent’s richness allowed civilization in the area, since the transition to agriculture (starting about 10,000 BC) was a difficult process and could only have worked in areas wherein alternatives were available should agriculture fail, such as the nuts, berries, and fish found in the foothills of the Fertile Crescent. But where the rivers squeeze together, near modern Baghdad, is Babylon, and it defines the break between Northern and Southern Mesopotamia. It is Southern Mesopotamia with its large alluvial plain that is considered more typically Mesopotamian. Since there is practically no rainfall in Southern Mesopotamia, rivers are crucial for life. Unlike the Nile, the rivers do not flood in any predictable way or time.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSERVATION FORCE a FORCE for WILDLIFE CONSERVATION the SURPRISING BENEFITS of LION SAFARI HUNTING (Rev
    CONSERVATION FORCE A FORCE FOR WILDLIFE CONSERVATION THE SURPRISING BENEFITS OF LION SAFARI HUNTING (Rev. May 29, 2018) Experts agree on the primary threats to African lion: loss of suitable habitat, loss of prey base, and conflict with humans and livestock.i These interrelated threats overlap. They are exacerbated by expanding human populations.ii Few lion still exist without management intervention to contend with these threats. Tourist safari hunting is an important management intervention that greatly counteracts those threats. Tourist safari huntingiii protects and secures the largest share of lion and prey habitat. It underwrites most poaching control, incentivizes rural community tolerance, supports rural livelihoods, and significantly funds management authority operating budgets. It provides these benefits in parts of Southern and Eastern Africa where the most lion continue to exist. The benefitsiv of tourist safari hunting counter the foremost threats to lion. Those benefits overwhelmingly account for the survival of most lion, habitat, and prey as well as the most lion population growth. Safari hunting is essential to maintain lion outside of national park boundaries as well as lion in parks when inevitably ranging beyond park boundaries. Habitat Secured by Tourist Safari Hunting Habitat loss is the “most powerful” threat impacting lion.v “In the face of expanding human and livestock populations, protecting habitat and prey populations is likely the most important single factor in the conservation of lions in Africa.”vi The
    [Show full text]
  • Nahum 2 December 20, 2020 Open with Prayer HOOK: Q: When You
    Nahum 2 December 20, 2020 Open with Prayer HOOK: Q: When you perceive people who you feel confident have no regard for God getting ahead in life (and I’ll let you define what “getting ahead” means to you), how do you process that? Where does your mind go? [Let people engage] Transition: Why does the wicked prosper? This question keeps rearing its ugly head, not only in Scripture, but even in our own lives. All of us want to see life to be “fair,” and we want those who live according to God’s commands and principles to be doing better than those who cheat, cut corners, take advantage of the vulnerable, etc. It can be frustrating to focus on those who appear to be getting ahead who have no concern for God or His teachings! If you share this frustration, then today’s study is for you and me!! Let’s begin. BOOK: Nineveh to Fall Nineveh Attacked (The attacker was Nabopolassar, the Babylonian who, with Cyaxeres the Mede, conquered Nineveh.) 2 An attacker advances against you, Nineveh. Guard the fortress, watch the road, brace yourselves, marshal all your strength! 2 The LORD will restore the splendor of Jacob like the splendor of Israel, though destroyers have laid them waste and have ruined their vines. 3 The shields of his soldiers are red; the warriors are clad in scarlet. The metal on the chariots’ flashes on the day they are made ready; the spears of pine are brandished. 4 The chariots storm through the streets, rushing back and forth through the squares.
    [Show full text]
  • Panthera Leo, Lion Errata Version Assessment By: Bauer, H., Packer, C., Funston, P.F., Henschel, P
    The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ ISSN 2307-8235 (online) IUCN 2008: T15951A115130419 Scope: Global Language: English Panthera leo, Lion Errata version Assessment by: Bauer, H., Packer, C., Funston, P.F., Henschel, P. & Nowell, K. View on www.iucnredlist.org Citation: Bauer, H., Packer, C., Funston, P.F., Henschel, P. & Nowell, K. 2016. Panthera leo. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T15951A115130419. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T15951A107265605.en Copyright: © 2017 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale, reposting or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. For further details see Terms of Use. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species Programme, the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership. The IUCN Red List Partners are: Arizona State University; BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens Conservation International; Conservation International; NatureServe; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; and Zoological Society of London. If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown in this document, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ Taxonomy Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia Chordata Mammalia Carnivora Felidae Taxon Name: Panthera leo (Linnaeus, 1758) Synonym(s): • Felis leo Linnaeus, 1758 Regional Assessments: • Mediterranean Infra-specific Taxa Assessed: • Panthera leo (West Africa subpopulation) • Panthera leo ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Captive Lion Breeding, Canned Lion Hunting & the Lion Bone Trade
    Captive Lion Breeding & Canned Lion Hunting: Damaging Brand South Africa? Captive Lion Breeding, Canned Lion Hunting & the Lion Bone Trade: Damaging Brand South Africa? A review of the worldwide reaction to South Africa’s captive lion breeding and canned hunting industry and involvement in the lion bone trade CACH UK & SPOTS Netherlands, August 2018 1 Captive Lion Breeding & Canned Lion Hunting: Damaging Brand South Africa? Introduction captive bred lion operators to advertise or market captive bred lions at its annual convention. Tourism is a key contributor to South Africa’s economy. In 2017, 10.29 million foreign tourists visited South Africa. In 2016 (last available detailed And just this month, South Africa’s Mango Airlines have joined the campaign data) tourism accounted for 2.9% of GDP, R136.1bn, and employed against lion cub petting with their in-flight magazine cover featuring a 686,586 people – outperforming key industries in job creation from 2012-16. powerful image of a lion and her cubs with the caption “her cubs, not yours”. (Figures from Statistics South Africa http://www.statssa.gov.za/?p=4362) But this negative worldwide image can easily be turned round to a PR win - A positive external image is essential for attracting overseas tourists. For many by banning captive lion breeding and phasing out captive bred lion hunting years foreign visitors have associated South Africa with stunning wildlife in in a managed way. This will show the world that the South African can lead natural habitats. But over the last few years, revelations about the truth and the way on animal welfare and ethical wildlife tourism.
    [Show full text]
  • BEYOND CECIL: AFRICA’S LIONS in CRISIS | Page - 1 the CECIL EFFECT
    CONTENTS ABOUT PANTHERA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Panthera, founded in 2006, is devoted exclusively to preserving 2 wild cats and their critical role in the world’s ecosystems. THE CECIL EFFECT Panthera’s team of leading biologists, law enforcement experts and wild cat advocates develop innovative strategies based on POPULATION STATUS 4 the best available science to protect cheetahs, jaguars, leopards, lions, pumas, snow leopards and tigers and their vast landscapes. THREATS 6 In 50 countries around the world, Panthera works with a wide variety of stakeholders to reduce or eliminate the most pressing threats to wild cats—securing their future, and ours. SOLUTIONS 15 Visit panthera.org ENDNOTES 23 ABOUT WILDAID WildAid’s mission is to end the illegal wildlife trade in our lifetimes. INQUIRIES We envision a world where people no longer buy wildlife products Panthera WildAid such as shark fin, elephant ivory and rhino horn. With an unrivaled Karen Wood Christina Vallianos portfolio of celebrity ambassadors and global network of media 8 West 40th St., 18th Floor 333 Pine St., Suite 300 partners, WildAid leverages nearly US$200 million in annual pro New York, NY 10018 San Francisco, CA 94104 bono media support with a simple but powerful message: “When [email protected] [email protected] the Buying Stops, the Killing Can Too.” Visit wildaid.org ABOUT WILDCRU David Macdonald founded the Wildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU) in 1986 at the University of Oxford. Now the foremost University-based centre for biodiversity conservation, the mission of the WildCRU is to achieve practical solutions to conservation problems through original research.
    [Show full text]
  • Panthera Leo – Lion
    Panthera leo – Lion Common names: Lion, African Lion (English), Leeu (Afrikaans), Isilwane (Ndebele), Tau (Sepedi, Sesotho, Setswana), Ndau (Tshivenda), isiGidi, iNgwenyama (Xhosa), iNgonyama (Xhosa, Zulu), Nghala (Xitsonga), iBhubesi (Zulu) Taxonomic status: Species Taxonomic notes: The latest published phylogeographical study of Lions shows that the traditional split between Asian and African Lions as distinct subspecies is untenable (Barnett et al. 2014). Based on these results, the Cat Classification Task Force of the IUCN SSC Cat Specialist Group has provisionally proposed a different split into two subspecies, P. l. leo of Asia and West, Central and North Africa; and P. l. melanochaita from South and East Africa, with several regional management units identified as well (Haas et al. 2005; Bertola et al. 2011, 2015; Bauer et al. 2015). Assessment Rationale The Lion populations in South Africa declined substantially in the 19th century but have been stable or increasing over the past 20–30 years. The number of free-roaming mature Lions in South African large protected areas has increased from an estimated 800 in 2002–2004 to an estimated 1,286 in 2015. Furthermore, by including the entire area of transfrontier parks as interconnected and functional landscapes (over which South African conservation authorities have shared management jurisdiction), the Susan Miller total number of mature, free-roaming Lions within the assessment region is estimated to be 1,550. The number Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern* of small reserves containing Lions has increased from one in 1990 to at least 45 in 2013, which corresponds to an National Red List status (2004) Vulnerable D1 increase in Lion numbers from about 10 in 1990 to 500 Reasons for change Genuine change: (225 mature individuals) in 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Conservation of Lions in Africa
    Guidelines for the Conservation of Lions in Africa Version 1.0 – December 2018 A collection of concepts, best practice experiences and recommendations, compiled by the IUCN SSC Cat Specialist Group on behalf of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) Guidelines for the Conservation of Lions in Africa A collection of concepts, best practice experiences and recommendations, compiled by the IUCN SSC Cat Specialist Group on behalf of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) The designation of geographical entities in this document, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or the organisations of the authors and editors of the document concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimi- tation of its frontiers or boundaries. 02 Frontispiece © Patrick Meier: Male lion in Kwando Lagoon, Botswana, March 2013. Suggested citation: IUCN SSC Cat Specialist Group. 2018. Guidelines for the Conservation of Lions in Africa. Version 1.0. Muri/Bern, Switzerland, 147 pages. Guidelines for the Conservation of Lions in Africa Contents Contents Acknowledgements..........................................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Textual and Visual Discourse in Ashurbanipal's North Palace
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2016 Representations of Royal Power: Textual and Visual Discourse in Ashurbanipal’s North Palace Cojocaru, Gabriela Augustina Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-135476 Dissertation Originally published at: Cojocaru, Gabriela Augustina. Representations of Royal Power: Textual and Visual Discourse in Ashur- banipal’s North Palace. 2016, University of Zurich / University of Bucharest, Faculty of Theology. University of Bucharest, Faculty of History History Doctoral School PhD Thesis in Ancient History and Archaeology Gabriela Augustina Cojocaru Representations of Royal Power: Textual and Visual Discourse in Ashurbanipal’s North Palace Advisor: Prof. Dr. Gheorghe Vlad Nistor Referents: Prof. Dr. Christoph Uehlinger (University of Zurich) Prof. Dr. Miron Ciho (University of Bucharest) Prof. Dr. Lucretiu Birliba (Al. I. Cuza University of Iasi) President of the committee: Prof. Dr. Antal Lukacs (University of Bucharest) Bucharest 2015 Contents List of Abbreviations .............................................................................................................................. ii List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................ iii List of Plates .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Excavation of the Solokha Kurgan Conducted by NI Veselovski in 1912
    ROYAL LION-HUNTING SCENE ON THE SILVER CUP OF SOLOKHA Osamu SUDZUKI Professor of Tenri University I Excavation of the Solokha Kurgan conducted by N. I. Veselovski in 1912- 13 near Nikopol on the left bank of the Dnieper was perhaps the last of the great archaeological successes in Czarist Russia(1). The main tomb-chamber under the Kurgan was found completely plundered, but the side tomb involved in the same Kurgan turned out to be one of the richest Scythian graves, including those of Cheltomlyk and Kul-oba(2), all being ascribed to the end of the 4th or the beginning of the 3rd century B.C. The silver cup under consideration is one of six discovered in the same tomb (Fig. I)(3). The cup shows in relief the scene of a lion hunt by equestrian figures under an ivy garland, and we naturally tend to assume it originated from similar scenes on the wall of such Assyrian palaces as Nimrud of Ashurnasirpal (885-860B.C.) or Nineveh of Ashurbanipal (668-626B.C.). But comparing these two, we must say that the latter is much nearer to the present relief in design than the former, in that, the former depicts the lion hunt in chariots only, with no equestrian hunter included. However, the lapse of almost 300 years of time is too great a gap to assume the present piece to be the reminiscent of the Nineveh lion hunt, and the only example (1) Ebert, Max: RLV. Bd. XII, S. 294 ff. (2) Minns, E. H.: Scythians and Greeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Boldness and Natural Behaviors in the African Lion (Panthera Leo): How Are They Related?
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Honors Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Fall 2017 Boldness and natural behaviors in the African lion (Panthera leo): How are they related? Courtney M. Kamyk University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/honors Part of the Applied Behavior Analysis Commons Recommended Citation Kamyk, Courtney M., "Boldness and natural behaviors in the African lion (Panthera leo): How are they related?" (2017). Honors Theses and Capstones. 378. https://scholars.unh.edu/honors/378 This Senior Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Boldness and natural behaviors in the African lion (Panthera leo): How are they related? Courtney Kamyk IROP July-August 2017 Livingstone, Zambia 2 Table of Contents I. List of Figures……………………………….………………………………………………..…3 II. List of Tables………………………………………………………………………………..….4 III. Acknowledgements…………………..……………………………………………………......5 IV. Abstract………..………………………………………………………………………………6 V. Ethical Statement…….…………………………..……………………………………..……...6 VI. Introduction………...…………………………...…………………………………………..…7 VII. Methods………….…...……………………………………………………………………..11 a. Study Location and Population………………………………………………………..11
    [Show full text]