DOCSLIB.ORG

BEYOND CECIL: AFRICA’S LIONS in CRISIS | Page - 1 the CECIL EFFECT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BEYOND CECIL: AFRICA’S LIONS in CRISIS | Page - 1 the CECIL EFFECT CONTENTS ABOUT PANTHERA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Panthera, founded in 2006, is devoted exclusively to preserving 2 wild cats and their critical role in the world’s ecosystems. THE CECIL EFFECT Panthera’s team of leading biologists, law enforcement experts and wild cat advocates develop innovative strategies based on POPULATION STATUS 4 the best available science to protect cheetahs, jaguars, leopards, lions, pumas, snow leopards and tigers and their vast landscapes. THREATS 6 In 50 countries around the world, Panthera works with a wide variety of stakeholders to reduce or eliminate the most pressing threats to wild cats—securing their future, and ours. SOLUTIONS 15 Visit panthera.org ENDNOTES 23 ABOUT WILDAID WildAid’s mission is to end the illegal wildlife trade in our lifetimes. INQUIRIES We envision a world where people no longer buy wildlife products Panthera WildAid such as shark fin, elephant ivory and rhino horn. With an unrivaled Karen Wood Christina Vallianos portfolio of celebrity ambassadors and global network of media 8 West 40th St., 18th Floor 333 Pine St., Suite 300 partners, WildAid leverages nearly US$200 million in annual pro New York, NY 10018 San Francisco, CA 94104 bono media support with a simple but powerful message: “When [email protected] [email protected] the Buying Stops, the Killing Can Too.” Visit wildaid.org ABOUT WILDCRU David Macdonald founded the Wildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU) in 1986 at the University of Oxford. Now the foremost University-based centre for biodiversity conservation, the mission of the WildCRU is to achieve practical solutions to conservation problems through original research. WildCRU is particularly renowned for its work with wild carnivores, especially wild cats, including its long-running studies on lion and clouded leopard. Its training centre for early-career conservationists, so far from 32 countries, produces experts and future leaders in global conservation. Visit wildcru.org REPORT CONTRIBUTORS Paul Funston Katarzyna Nowak Philipp Henschel Christina Vallianos Luke Hunter Karen Wood Peter Lindsey Cecil cover photo: Craig Taylor Nick Garbutt EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ew stories about an individual wild with domestic herds can lead to lions The good news is that there are solutions Fanimal have had as much global killing livestock, which in turn provokes to most of these threats to lions. Wherever impact as that of Cecil, the magnificent, retaliatory killing of lions by herders and human pressures have been reduced, black-maned lion that was illegally hunted ranchers. This is one of the top three savanna habitats, their wildlife populations, in Zimbabwe in July 2015. The massive threats in West, Central, East and parts and particularly lions, have bounced back. outpouring of grief and anger spurred of Southern Africa.2 Outside official Perhaps the single most important step significant global restrictions on the PAs, retaliatory and preemptive killing is in securing the future of lions in Africa is import of African lion trophies, and it considered the primary threat to lions.3 mobilizing massive support for effective raised the bar for hunters and governments protection and management of its system by requiring them to provide scientific Human encroachment also leads to illegal of PAs. Successful lion conservation evidence of the purported benefits of lion bushmeat hunting, a second severe requires significantly more resources than hunting to the species. threat to both lions and their prey. While are currently allocated to PAs in range bushmeat was once obtained primarily states. Outside of these areas, conflict More importantly, this tragedy focused for subsistence in rural communities, arising from depredation of livestock by worldwide attention on the plight of the today it is also sold commercially within lions must be addressed. Reducing the African lion, which is now known to be African urban markets and internationally vulnerability of livestock to lion predation racing toward local extinction throughout to markets in the United States and and encouraging local people to value much of the continent. Contrary to Europe. As bushmeat hunting expands lions’ presence are critical steps forward. popular belief, trophy hunting is a small from the forests to the savannas, vast factor in the fate of the African lion—a areas have been emptied of large wildlife, relatively minor battle in the larger war especially the medium to large ungulates There is hope for the future of on lions that has caused their populations such as wildebeest, zebra, buffalo and Africa’s lions—the threats are to plunge by more than 43% in the past impala on which lions subsist. Even the known, the solutions exist, and two decades to just around 20,000. In the largest PAs are affected by bushmeat the global passion to save this same period, populations in West, Central poaching, including the Serengeti where emblematic species is evident— and East Africa are collectively estimated tens of thousands of wildebeest are but the world must come together to have declined by 60%. killed in snares each year.4 In addition to mobilize its response in the to a depleted prey base, lions are often same way it did a year ago to The loss of lion habitat to agricultural caught and killed in the snares poachers implement effective reform. expansion is the underlying factor that indiscriminately set for the lions’ prey. In gives rise to all major threats to lions. Mozambique’s Niassa National Reserve, Having lost at least 75% of their original snares are the biggest threat to lions, habitat over the past 100 years, lions now causing 52% of mortalities.5 occupy only about 8% of their historical range and are reported to have already vanished from 12 African countries. “ As Africa’s human population grows Lions have suffered a 43% exponentially—from 1.2 billion currently to 2.47 billion in 20501—more land is population decrease over the needed to house people and produce past two decades. the required food to sustain them. Cultivated land area in sub-Saharan Africa is expected to increase by 21% and New threats are emerging, including a livestock by 73% within this same period. growing trade in lion bones and other As human occupation of African savannas body parts. In addition to local African expands, interactions between lions and use of these products for ceremonies humans become more frequent. Lion prey and rituals, lions are being poached as a species compete with livestock grazing substitute for tiger bones in Asia. in Protected Areas (PAs). Close contact BEYOND CECIL: AFRICA’S LIONS IN CRISIS | Page - 1 THE CECIL EFFECT here are many reasons why Cecil’s had banned lion trophy imports earlier to show that their programs actually Tstory resonates with the media and in the year, reportedly in response to enhance and protect wild populations.12 public: the fact that the lion was named and lobbying against canned hunting.8 Major This represents an ambitious standard well-known to researchers and tourists in airlines, including Delta, United and rarely achieved without concerted effort Hwange National Park; the fact that he American Airlines, announced that they and ongoing verification. Only a few cases was a radio-collared animal; that he was would stop carrying hunting trophies meet these criteria. killed for “fun” by a wealthy American; from lion, leopard, elephant, rhinoceros the tearful announcement of his death and buffalo,9 joining British Airways and It is important to note that well before by a popular U.S. TV host; and the viral Virgin Atlantic, which already had bans in Cecil’s death, some African countries that spread of photographs and commentary place on the carriage of hunting trophies.10 allow lion hunting had begun taking action, on social media. While the hunter was not heeding the scientific consensus that ultimately charged with a crime, these In January 2016, following the publication poorly managed hunting is unsustainable. factors galvanized a fateful moment into a of a devastating study showing that most In recent years, Mozambique, Tanzania, global movement to avenge Cecil’s death. African lion populations were declining Zambia and Zimbabwe have enacted sharply, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service significant reforms on lion hunting Since that day, numerous governments, granted endangered status for the West practices, including reducing their corporations, advocacy groups, and and Central African lions, and threatened quotas for lions. At times, both Zambia science-based organizations have taken status for East and Southern African lions and Zimbabwe have suspended lion action. Several Western nations moved under the Endangered Species Act.11 hunting for multi-year periods to allow to tighten restrictions on the import of populations to recover. lion trophies. France and the Netherlands U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director banned lion trophy imports outright, Dan Ashe stated that the listing would The positive actions of these countries while the United Kingdom issued a sharp “raise the bar significantly” for African and the Cecil Effect notwithstanding, lions warning to the hunting industry and lion trophies by requiring documentation in much of Africa are in freefall. governments in countries permitting lion proving that the hunts had been hunting to improve their performance or conducted in a sustainable manner. In face a ban on trophy imports.6,7 Australia addition, source countries would need Cecil in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe. Paul Funston Page - 2 “One year ago, with the loss of Cecil, the world responded unequivocally that it stands with Africa in saving the lion. Sadly, we have since lost hundreds and possibly thousands of lions. The species is now approaching the point of no return in many countries. Saving this extraordinary animal requires the international community to convert their outrage over Cecil into action and dollars supporting African governments, people and initiatives fighting to save the lion.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • See White Deer Story, Page 2 PAGE 2THE C.A.S.H
    Nonprofit Org. C.A.S.H. COMMITTEE TO ABOLISH SPORT HUNTING U.S. Postage WILDLIFE WATCH, INC. Paid Newburgh, NY THE C.A.S.H. COURIER PO Box 562 Permit No. 450 New Paltz, NY 12561 THE COMMITTEE TO ABOLISH SPORT HUNTING Phone: (845) 256-1400 Fax: (845) 818-3622 DIVISION OF ILDLIFE ATCH NC www.wildwatch.org A W W , I . www.all-creatures.org/cash © 2008 BY WILDLIFE WATCH, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. www.canadageese.org WINTER 2008 TO OUR WONDERFUL MEMBER: MISSION STATEMENT: The mission of C.A.S.H. - Committee to What Will Happen to the White Abolish Sport Hunting - is to accomplish what its name says in the shortest possible time. Understanding that Deer at the Seneca Army Depot? abolishing hunting entails a process, a series of steps taken and not a single BY PETER MULLER action that would effect our goal over- th night, a time frame cannot be estab- On Thursday, December 13 2007 in close to white-out snow-storm-conditions, lished. We hope for building a succes- about 100 Seneca (NY) County residents braved the elements and crowded into sion of wins, and if not wins immedi- the small Varick Town Hall. They were joined there by Rita and Joe Sarnicola ately then at least a succession of from nearby Auburn, NY, Anne and Peter Muller from Wildlife Watch, as well as stirrings of consciousness. We hope to encourage those who are still silent to several other animal protection groups. speak out, awakening community after What brought this large group to a small town in New York State on that day? community about the heavy hand of The answer to that question started about 65 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Lion Hunting Behaviour and Vegetation Structure in an African Savanna
    Lion hunting behaviour and vegetation structure in an African savanna a,* b,c,1 a,2 Scott R. Loarie , Craig J. Tambling , Gregory P. Asner a Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA, U.S.A. b Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa c Centre for African Conservation Ecology, Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa Emerging evidence suggests that male lions are not dependent on female’s hunting skills but are in fact successful hunters. But difficulty locating kills and objectively characterizing landscapes has complicated the comparison of male and female lion hunting strategies. We used airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) measurements of vegetation structure in Kruger National Park, combined with global positioning system (GPS) telemetry data on lion, Panthera leo, kills to quantify lines-of-sight where lion kills occurred compared with areas where lions rested, while controlling for time of day. We found significant differences in use of vegetation structure by male and female lions during hunts. While male lions killed in landscapes with much shorter lines- of-sight (16.2 m) than those in which they rested, there were no significant differences for female lions. These results were consistent across sizes of prey species. The influence of vegetation structure in shaping predatoreprey interactions is often hypothe-sized, but quantitative evidence has been scarce. Although our sample sizes were limited, our results provide a mechanism, ambush hunting versus social hunting in the open, to explain why hunting success of male lions might equal that of females.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Lion Conservation, 2016
    Report on Lion Conservation with Particular Respect to the Issue of Trophy Hunting AreportpreparedbyProfessor David W. Macdonald CBE, FRSE, DSc⇤ tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Director of WildCRU, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt at the request of Rory Stewart OBE ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Under Secretary of State for the Environment tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt 28 November 2016 ⇤[email protected] Lion Conservation and Trophy Hunting Report Macdonald et al. Contributors TTT This report was prepared with the assistance of members of the Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, of which the core team was Dr Amy Dickman, Dr Andrew Loveridge, Mr Kim Jacobsen, Dr Paul Johnson, Dr Christopher O’Kane and..Dr Byron du Preez, supported by Dr Kristina Kesch and Ms Laura Perry. It benefitted from critical review by: TTTDr Guillaume Chapron TTTDr Peter Lindsey TTTProfessor Craig Packer It also benefitted from helpful input from: TTTDr Hans Bauer TTTProfessor Claudio Sillero TTTDr Christiaan Winterbach TTTProfessor John Vucetich Under the aegis of DEFRA the report
    [Show full text]
  • Charging Forward for Animals
    2006 HSUS Annual Report Celebrating Animals | Confronting Cruelty Charging Forward for Animals R59542.indd C1 5/22/07 14:14:27 Offi cers Directors David O. Wiebers, M.D. Leslie Lee Alexander, Esq. Chair of the Board Patricia Mares Asip Anita W. Coupe, Esq. Peter A. Bender Vice Chair of the Board Barbara S. Brack Walter J. Stewart, Esq. Board Treasurer Anita W. Coupe, Esq. Wayne Pacelle Neil B. Fang, Esq., C.P.A. President & CEO Judi Friedman G. Thomas Waite III David John Jhirad, Ph.D. Treasurer & CFO Jennifer Leaning, M.D., S.M.H. Roger A. Kindler, Esq. General Counsel & CLO Kathleen M. Linehan, Esq. Janet D. Frake William F. Mancuso Secretary Mary I. Max Andrew N. Rowan, Ph.D. Patrick L. McDonnell Executive Vice President Operations Gil Michaels Michael Markarian Judy Ney Executive Vice President Judy J. Peil External Affairs Marian G. Probst The HSUS by the Numbers . 1 Joshua S. Reichert, Ph.D. Ending Abuse and Suffering: An Epic Battle on Many Fronts . 2 Jeffery O. Rose Uncaging the Victims of Factory Farming: Remarkable Progress for Reforms . 4 James D. Ross, Esq. Taking the Fight to the Courts: Aggressive Litigation Gets Fast Results . 6 Marilyn G. Seyler The Next Time Disaster Strikes: Animals Won’t Be Left Behind . .8 Walter J. Stewart, Esq. The Depravity Worsens: Animal Fighting Takes an Ugly Turn . 10 John E. Taft Animals in Media: Genesis Honors the Best . 12 Andrew Weinstein Drawing a Bead on Blood Sports: Shooting Down Hunters and Tax Cheats . 14 Persia White Last Roundup for Equine Butchers: No More U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • G.S. 150B-21.3A Report for 15A NCAC 10H, REGULATED
    G.S. 150B‐21.3A Report for 15A NCAC 10H, REGULATED ACTIVITIES Agency ‐ Wildlife Resources Commission Comment Period ‐ May 16, 2016‐August 1, 2016 Date Submitted to APO ‐ November 21, 2016 RRC Final Determination of Status Date and Last Agency Action Agency Determination [150B‐ Implements or Conforms to Federal Public Comment Received [150B‐ Agency Determination Following RRC Determination of Public Subchapter Rule Section Rule Citation Rule Name Federal Regulation Citation of Rule for Report to APO [150B‐ OAH Next Steps on the Rule 21.3A(c)(1)a] Regulation [150B‐21.3A(e)] 21.3A(c)(1)] Public Comment [150B‐21.3A(c)(1)] Comments [150B‐21.3A(c)(2) 21.3A(c)(2)] SUBCHAPTER 10H ‑ SECTION .0100 ‑ 15A NCAC 10H .0101 LICENSE TO OPERATE Amended Eff. August 1, 2010 REGULATED CONTROLLED ACTIVITIES HUNTING Necessary without substantive Necessary with substantive public RRC not required to review Necessary with substantive public No Yes Agency must readopt PRESERVES FOR public interest interest comment(s) interest and must be readopted DOMESTICALLY RAISED GAME BIRDS 15A NCAC 10H .0102 ESTABLISHMENT AND Amended Eff. June 1, 2009 Necessary without substantive OPERATION Necessary without substantive Necessary without substantive No Yes No comments with merit public interest and should remain in Keep in Code ‐ Update History Note public interest public interest effect without further action 15A NCAC 10H .0103 LABELING Amended Eff. November 1, 1990 Necessary without substantive Necessary without substantive Necessary without substantive No Yes No comments with merit public interest and should remain in Keep in Code ‐ Update History Note public interest public interest effect without further action 15A NCAC 10H .0104 QUALITY OF BIRDS RELEASED Amended Eff.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Poaching in the United States - Are We Protecting Our Wildlife
    Volume 33 Issue 4 Wildlife Law and Policy Issues Fall 1993 The Status of Poaching in the United States - Are We Protecting Our Wildlife Ruth S. Musgrave Sara Parker Miriam Wolok Recommended Citation Ruth S. Musgrave, Sara Parker & Miriam Wolok, The Status of Poaching in the United States - Are We Protecting Our Wildlife, 33 Nat. Resources J. 977 (1993). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol33/iss4/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. RUTH S. MUSGRAVE, SARA PARKER AND MIRIAM WOLOK* The Status Of Poaching In The United States-Are We Protecting Our Wildlife?** ABSTRACT Poachingactivities in the United States are on the rise, deplet- ing both game and nongame wildlife. Federal laws for protection of wildlife, such as the Lacey Act and the Endangered Species Act, provide some muscle to enforcement efforts, but it is largely the states that must bear the brunt of enforcement of wildlife laws. This article describes the extent of the poaching problem in the United States and compares various types of state laws that can impact poaching. Interviews of enforcement officers in the field and original research regarding the content of and differences be- tween state laws yield an array of proposed solutions and recom- mendationsfor action. Among the recommendationsare education of the judiciary and prosecuting attorneys, and making state laws consistent in their enforcement of wildlife protection policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Art and Imperialism in the Ancient Near East Prof. Marian Feldman, History of Art and Near Eastern Studies, UCB
    Art and Imperialism in the Ancient Near East Prof. Marian Feldman, History of Art and Near Eastern Studies, UCB. http://orias.berkeley.edu/summer2010/Summer2010Home.htm Summarized by Timothy Doran Art in the form of figurative imagery and architectural and monumental construction has long played a central role in imperialism. Some of the earliest known empires of the ancient world – namely, the Akkadian, Old Babylonian, Neo-Assyrian, and Achaemenid Persian – communicated a harmonious, hierarchic worldview of authority and order in which the present power structure was portrayed as proper, natural, and beneficial. An imperial vision was shaped by monuments and architecture of each period: the Warka Vase from the Late Uruk period, the Victory Stele of Naram-Sin, the Law Code Stele of Hammurabi, the lion hunt reliefs of Ashurbanipal, and the wall reliefs of the audience hall in the city of Persepolis. The region’s environment constrained the development of power. The Fertile Crescent’s richness allowed civilization in the area, since the transition to agriculture (starting about 10,000 BC) was a difficult process and could only have worked in areas wherein alternatives were available should agriculture fail, such as the nuts, berries, and fish found in the foothills of the Fertile Crescent. But where the rivers squeeze together, near modern Baghdad, is Babylon, and it defines the break between Northern and Southern Mesopotamia. It is Southern Mesopotamia with its large alluvial plain that is considered more typically Mesopotamian. Since there is practically no rainfall in Southern Mesopotamia, rivers are crucial for life. Unlike the Nile, the rivers do not flood in any predictable way or time.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological and Social Issues Related to Confinement of Wild Ungulates
    Biological and Social Issues Related to Confinement of Wild Ungulates THE WILDLIFE SOCIETY Technical Review 02-3 2002 BIOLOGICALANDSOCIALISSUESRELATEDTOCONFINEMENTOFWILDUNGULATES The Wildlife Society Members of The Technical Committee on Wild Ungulate Confinement Stephen Demarais (Chair) Elizabeth S. Williams Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Department of Veterinary Sciences Mississippi State University University of Wyoming Box 9690 1174 Snowy Range Road Mississippi State, MS 39762 Laramie, WY 82070 Randall W. DeYoung Scot J. Williamson Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Wildlife Management Institute Mississippi State University RR 1, Box 587, Spur Road Box 9690 North Stratford, NH 03590 Mississippi State, MS 39762 Gary J. Wolfe L. Jack Lyon Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation Box 9045 4722 Aspen Drive Missoula, MT 59807 Missoula, MT 59802 Edited by Laura Andrews The Wildlife Society Technical Review 02-3 5410 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 200 November 2002 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Foreword Presidents of The Wildlife Society occasionally appoint ad hoc committees to study and report on selected conservation issues. The reports ordinarily appear in 2 related series called either Technical Review (formerly "White Paper") or Position Statement. Review papers present technical information and the views of the appointed committee members, but not necessarily the views of their employers. Position statements are based on the review papers, and the preliminary versions ordinarily are published in The Wildliferfor comment by Society members. Following the comment period, revision, and Council's approval, the statements are published as official positions of The Wildlife Society. Both types of reports are copyrighted by the Society, but individuals are granted permission to make single copies for noncommercial purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSERVATION FORCE a FORCE for WILDLIFE CONSERVATION the SURPRISING BENEFITS of LION SAFARI HUNTING (Rev
    CONSERVATION FORCE A FORCE FOR WILDLIFE CONSERVATION THE SURPRISING BENEFITS OF LION SAFARI HUNTING (Rev. May 29, 2018) Experts agree on the primary threats to African lion: loss of suitable habitat, loss of prey base, and conflict with humans and livestock.i These interrelated threats overlap. They are exacerbated by expanding human populations.ii Few lion still exist without management intervention to contend with these threats. Tourist safari hunting is an important management intervention that greatly counteracts those threats. Tourist safari huntingiii protects and secures the largest share of lion and prey habitat. It underwrites most poaching control, incentivizes rural community tolerance, supports rural livelihoods, and significantly funds management authority operating budgets. It provides these benefits in parts of Southern and Eastern Africa where the most lion continue to exist. The benefitsiv of tourist safari hunting counter the foremost threats to lion. Those benefits overwhelmingly account for the survival of most lion, habitat, and prey as well as the most lion population growth. Safari hunting is essential to maintain lion outside of national park boundaries as well as lion in parks when inevitably ranging beyond park boundaries. Habitat Secured by Tourist Safari Hunting Habitat loss is the “most powerful” threat impacting lion.v “In the face of expanding human and livestock populations, protecting habitat and prey populations is likely the most important single factor in the conservation of lions in Africa.”vi The
    [Show full text]
  • SURPLUS ANIMALS: the CYCLE of HELL a Study of Captive Wildlife in the United States
    SURPLUS ANIMALS: THE CYCLE OF HELL A Study of Captive Wildlife in the United States BACKGROUND AND HISTORY As recently as the 1960's, the problem of surplus animals was minimal. Traffic in captive wildlife was limited to a small group of breeders/dealers and wildlife photographers who produced animals for documentary programs such as Disney, Wild Kingdom, and other wildlife series. The Hollywood animal industry was just beginning to burgeon, due to the popularity of such television shows as "Flipper," "Gentle Ben," "Daktari," "Cowboy in Africa," and many more. Unfortunately for the animals, money-hungry entrepreneurs saw an opportunity to make big bucks by exploiting the public's love of animals. In fact, it was Ivan Tors, producer of several of the aforementioned television shows, who first had the idea to capture an orca for a theme park. Now approximately 1620 dolphins and whales have been captured for exhibition in hotels and theme parks around the world in the name of entertainment. Hundreds have died. To capitalize on the Hollywood animal craze, a small group of middlemen surfaced who bartered for or purchased surplus animals from zoos to supply film productions, animal trainers, and theme parks. During the sixties, the zoo community was breeding excessively and randomly in order to produce "cute" baby animals for public display and as an incentive for people to visit their institutions. Zoos utilized these roving middle men because they were an effective means of disposing of the "cute" little babies at the end of the season-when they weren't cute anymore. The cycle of "surplus" animals had begun.
    [Show full text]
  • Nahum 2 December 20, 2020 Open with Prayer HOOK: Q: When You
    Nahum 2 December 20, 2020 Open with Prayer HOOK: Q: When you perceive people who you feel confident have no regard for God getting ahead in life (and I’ll let you define what “getting ahead” means to you), how do you process that? Where does your mind go? [Let people engage] Transition: Why does the wicked prosper? This question keeps rearing its ugly head, not only in Scripture, but even in our own lives. All of us want to see life to be “fair,” and we want those who live according to God’s commands and principles to be doing better than those who cheat, cut corners, take advantage of the vulnerable, etc. It can be frustrating to focus on those who appear to be getting ahead who have no concern for God or His teachings! If you share this frustration, then today’s study is for you and me!! Let’s begin. BOOK: Nineveh to Fall Nineveh Attacked (The attacker was Nabopolassar, the Babylonian who, with Cyaxeres the Mede, conquered Nineveh.) 2 An attacker advances against you, Nineveh. Guard the fortress, watch the road, brace yourselves, marshal all your strength! 2 The LORD will restore the splendor of Jacob like the splendor of Israel, though destroyers have laid them waste and have ruined their vines. 3 The shields of his soldiers are red; the warriors are clad in scarlet. The metal on the chariots’ flashes on the day they are made ready; the spears of pine are brandished. 4 The chariots storm through the streets, rushing back and forth through the squares.
    [Show full text]
  • Franken-Deer
    FRANKEN–DEER , NOVEMBER 2013. 4, THE INDIANAPOLIS STAR ©2013 GANNETT-CN.©2013 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ISTOCK; FROM 32 | 2015 ISSUE 1 | OUTDOOR AMERICA | THE IZAAK WALTON LEAGUE OF AMERICA FRANKEN–DEER BY LISA DENSMORE BALLARD How genetically manipulated animals and canned hunts threaten North American hunting THE IZAAK WALTON LEAGUE OF AMERICA | OUTDOOR AMERICA | 2015 ISSUE 1 | 33 About 20 years ago, scientists employed by a multi-national agricultural company genetically engineered the “perfect pig” for the American pork market. It had huge, tender hams; meaty, flavorful bacon; and ribs so large and juicy that they practically melted off the bone. AThere was only one problem: The pig’s legs were so short it couldn’t walk. Therein lies one of the key issues with genetically altering animals. By selecting for one trait, you might end up with other, less desirable ones. In addition to physical deformities, another common side effect of engineering animals is weakened resistance to disease. One or both of these disadvantages reduces an animal’s ability to survive in the wild. If it can survive, such an animal might have an unexpected impact on an ecosystem. The ability to breed wild animals for a specific trait, such as white-tailed deer and elk with enormous antlers, raises an important ethical question: Should we do it? Emerging Science Man has used selective breeding techniques for desirable traits in domestic animals for thousands of years. We’ve done this not only for meat quality and quantity but also good looks, a good nose, a good nature, and other advantageous characteristics.
    [Show full text]