DOCSLIB.ORG

Unit Three CA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unit Three CA MR. CLINE MARSHALL HIGH SCHOOL WESTERN CIVILIZATION II UNIT TWO CA * The Renaissance • Monarchs vs. The Aristocracy: The Birth of Legislatures • Monarchs Challenge the Church • Two things stood as roadblocks for the rise of these new monarchs: the church and the nobles. • Both of these groups feared the rise of the monarchs and weren't willing to surrender their power without a fight. • However, these monarchs were very crafty, doing three things to gain ultimate power and control. * The Renaissance • Monarchs vs. The Aristocracy: The Birth of Legislatures • Monarchs Challenge the Church • They directly challenged church authority. • They included the middle class in their rulings and parliaments. • They limited the position and power of the aristocracy. • Let's first begin with the challenge to church authority. • When the Medieval idea that the church should be in control of government came in, the new monarchs strongly disagreed. • After all, one of the main ideas of the Renaissance was that people should be free to think on their own without constant interference from the church. • Building on this ideology, kings and queens took a more worldly approach to governing, making moves to not only challenge the church but also to separate church and state. * The Renaissance • Monarchs vs. The Aristocracy: The Birth of Legislatures • Monarchs Challenge the Church • This was a new tactic because medieval tradition believed that since the church claimed the right to peoples' souls, they should also rule over the peoples' government. • However, with the coming of the Renaissance, the monarchs turned this idea upside down, basically saying to the church, 'Thanks, but we can take it from here!' • One great example of this was the 14th century Babylonian Captivity of the Papacy, in which the church seat was moved to Avignon, France. • With this move came the impression that the pope was simply a puppet in the hands of the French kings of the day, some of whom included Philip VI, Louis X, and Charles IV. • This rise of secular power was also being felt in Italy as Machiavelli, one of the best-known Florentine writers, stressed that government rule should be based on the secular and not the religious. * The Renaissance • Monarchs vs. The Aristocracy: The Birth of Legislatures • Monarchs Challenge the Church • This idea is bluntly stated in his early 16th century work, The Prince. • Probably the best example of royalty 'thumbing their noses at the church' was the English Act of Supremacy in the year 1534. • This controversial piece of legislation not only limited the church, it completely separated England from the Catholic Church, declaring King Henry VIII (you know, the guy with all the wives) the supreme head of the Church of England (Anglican or Episcopalian). • Monarchs Include the Middle Class • As the power of the church weakened, the monarchies pulled out the next weapon in their arsenal: the growing middle class. • During the Renaissance, urban areas began to prosper as trade grew between cities and other countries. * The Renaissance • Monarchs vs. The Aristocracy: The Birth of Legislatures • Monarchs Include the Middle Class • This newfound source of income freed the common class from the system of feudalism. • Wealth was no longer to be held simply through land ownership but through commerce and trade. • As cities grew, jobs were rapidly created. • With these jobs came a brand new group of income earners or, in the monarchs' eyes, a brand new source of tax income! • King Henry III of England is one of the first European monarchs to begin regularly taxing his subjects. • Oddly enough, although the common class now had to pay taxes, they began to embrace their rulers as symbols of national pride. * The Renaissance • Monarchs vs. The Aristocracy: The Birth of Legislatures • Monarchs Include the Middle Class • In short, it seems the freedom from feudalism was well worth the price of the taxes. • Monarchs Challenge the Aristocracy • To continue, this shift in finances and this new tax base gave the monarchies a treasury with which to fund their own standing armies. • This was a huge change in political influence, since up to this point, kings and queens relied on wealthy landowners or the aristocracy for the raising of troops (feudalism). • An excellent example of this change is the strong, national forces of Spain under the rule of Ferdinand and Isabella. • With this ability to raise an army, monarchs became strong central leaders who could directly challenge the power of the old aristocratic class. * The Renaissance • Monarchs vs. The Aristocracy: The Birth of Legislatures • Monarchs Challenge the Aristocracy • The wealth of their countries was no longer found in the feudal system, meaning the majority of their populations no longer owed allegiance to the aristocratic nobility. • With this reality came the monarchies' chance to limit the power of the aristocracy. • The first way we see this happening is through the hiring of non- aristocratic subjects to the administration of the monarchs' bureaucracies. • In simpler terms, the kings and queens of Europe began using common men to replace the aristocracy. • This gained the royals even more public support while further limiting the nobility. * The Renaissance • Monarchs vs. The Aristocracy: The Birth of Legislatures • Monarchs Challenge the Aristocracy • This new group of common bureaucrats soon became known as parliaments. • They replaced the aristocracy in areas of counsel and even consent in the monarchies' decision-making process. • These new parliaments, named from the Latin word parliamentum (or 'to discuss'), enabled the royals to raise money through taxes while also keeping a close eye on the nobility. • In many ways, they acted as a go-between for common men and their kings. • In many European nations, these parliaments soon dwindled into mere puppets under the control of the ruling royals. * The Renaissance • Monarchs vs. The Aristocracy: The Birth of Legislatures • Monarchs Challenge the Aristocracy • However, this was not the case in England, where the king faced increasing pressure by his parliament to invite a greater selection of subjects to attend parliament. • This is known as the Principle of Common Consent. • With the growth of parliaments and the increase of the monarchs' positions of power, one question needed to be answered: what to do with the old aristocracy? • The monarchs cleverly answer this question with the introduction of court life to their realms. • In this practice, the royal courts became the center of life for the nobility, in essence reducing the aristocracy to a royal entourage. * The Renaissance • Monarchs vs. The Aristocracy: The Birth of Legislatures • Monarchs Challenge the Aristocracy • Nobles were required to live at court, and as a result, were under the constant surveillance of the king. • This allowed the monarchs to control the nobles and, more importantly, allowed them to prevent a coup or uprising of the wealthy. • In reality, the introduction of court life was almost a deal made between the aristocracy and the monarchies. • The monarchies funded the wealthy lifestyle of the nobles but gained almost absolute power. • In turn, the aristocracy gave up their power for life in a gilded cage, complete with luscious foods, parties, and hunting trips galore. • All and all, not a bad deal for either side! * The Renaissance • The Formation of Modern Nation States • Europe Prior to the 1500s • In today's modern world, the idea of nations and nationalities is widely understood. • For instance, I'm an American, and so are these guys. These folks are not. • Although we're all rather friendly, we come from different nations, and this makes sense to us. • However, this concept was not always understood. • In fact, prior to the 1500s, the known world was without concrete nations or, to use the scholarly term, nation-states. • We are going to focus on these modern nation states and how they came about. * The Renaissance • The Formation of Modern Nation States • Europe Prior to the 1500s • For our purposes, we'll focus on two main factors which led to the rise of nation states. • They are the same as those that led to the rise of parliaments: the decline of feudalism and the decline of Church power. • To begin a nation state is a defined territory with a sovereign government, made up of people sharing a common culture, history, and language. • It's what's usually meant when we hear terms like nation or country. • The medieval period of Europe, which lasted from about the 5th to the 15th century, saw most of Europe entrenched in feudalism. • And, although the common folk may have heard of a king, it was the wealthy land owner who ruled their lives. * The Renaissance • The Formation of Modern Nation States • Europe Prior to the 1500s • Their allegiance was to him and his land, not to a crown or a country. • However, this all started to change during the 15th century. • The Decline of Feudalism • After the Crusades, European soldiers began returning home with tales of the wealthy East. • This led to the development of trade routes between the East and the West, and in just a short time, towns and cities began developing along these routes. • Over time, these towns began demanding independence from local lords, realizing they could stand on their own. * The Renaissance • The Formation of Modern Nation States • The Decline of Feudalism • Making matters even worse for the feudal lords, towns became beacons of freedom for poor workers looking for life beyond the yoke of feudalism. • Instead of feeling trapped by generations of poverty, the poorer classes seized the opportunity to become free merchants and craftsman within these new towns. • In short, as towns grew, feudalism's grip began to weaken. • Monarchs Emerge • As feudal lords were losing their grip, a number of European monarchs seized the opportunity to consolidate power by allying themselves with the growing merchant class.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Albret, Jean D' Entries Châlons-En-Champagne (1487)
    Index Abbeville 113, 182 Albret, Jean d’ Entries Entries Charles de Bourbon (1520) 183 Châlons-en-Champagne (1487) 181 Charles VIII (1493) 26–27, 35, 41, Albret, Jeanne d’ 50–51, 81, 97, 112 Entries Eleanor of Austria (1531) 60, 139, Limoges (1556) 202 148n64, 160–61 Alençon, Charles, duke of (d.1525) 186, Henry VI (1430) 136 188–89 Louis XI (1463) 53, 86n43, 97n90 Almanni, Luigi 109 Repurchased by Louis XI (1463) 53 Altars 43, 44 Abigail, wife of King David 96 Ambassadors 9–10, 76, 97, 146, 156 Albon de Saint André, Jean d’ 134 Amboise 135, 154 Entries Amboise, Edict of (1563) 67 Lyon (1550) 192, 197, 198–99, 201, 209, Amboise, Georges d’, cardinal and archbishop 214 of Rouen (d.1510) 64–65, 130, 194 Abraham 96 Entries Accounts, financial 15, 16 Noyon (1508) 204 Aeneas 107 Paris (1502) 194 Agamemnon 108 Saint-Quentin (1508) 204 Agen Amelot, Jacques-Charles 218 Entries Amiens 143, 182 Catherine de Medici (1578) 171 Bishop of Charles IX (1565) 125–26, 151–52 Entries Governors 183–84 Nicholas de Pellevé (1555) 28 Oath to Louis XI 185 Captain of 120 Preparing entry for Francis I (1542) 79 Claubaut family 91 Agricol, Saint 184 Confirmation of liberties at court 44, Aire-sur-la-Lys 225 63–64 Aix-en-Provence Entries Confirmation of liberties at court 63n156 Anne of Beaujeu (1493) 105, 175 Entries Antoine de Bourbon (1541) 143, 192, Charles IX (1564) 66n167 209 Bernard de Nogaret de La Valette (1587) Charles VI and Dauphin Louis (1414) 196n79 97n90, 139, 211n164 Françoise de Foix-Candale (1547) Léonor dʼOrléans, duke of Longueville 213–14 (1571)
    [Show full text]
  • Louis XI by Gerald Rose
    Louis XI by Gerald Rose March 27—It was France’s King Louis XI, who estab- imagine the effect of Jeanne on a young boy of six who lished the world’s first nation-state republic. This he did was to become King. The story of Louis and his con- in the wake of Jeanne D’Arc’s victory, and in the midst solidation of the first modern nation state, is detailed in of that Golden Renaissance which her martyrdom had several studies in Fidelio magazine. Excerpts from triggered, a Renaissance which began among a section some of these studies will be included in this article. of the Catholic clergy. Louis himself identified the new- The issue at hand is the immortal mission of Jeanne born republic as a “Commonwealth.” As you will see, d’Arc, as it bears on the creation of modern history and under Louis, for the first time in modern history, the the creation of the modern Nation State or, in Louis’ core of the nation is the development of its people. words, the “Commonwealth.” Before Louis XI, the territory of France had had no It was precisely breaking the back of the genocidal citizens. It had feudal barons, each a law unto himself; Norman oligarchy that allowed forces in the Church a corrupt clergy, whose allegiance was to the Pope; and allied with the Augustinian teaching order “The Breth- a King to whom they paid fealty. Everyone else was ren Of The Common Life,” to re-establish control of the only a serf of one sort or another.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Monarchs
    The New Monarchs AP European History J.F. Walters (2010) 1 1 The New Monarchs: Essential Questions 1. What were the general characteristics of the New Monarchs? 2. In what ways was Henry VII a New Monarch? 3. In what ways were Louis XI and François I New Monarchs? 4. In what ways were Ferdinand & Isabella New Monarchs? 5. What was the Reconquista? 6. What was the Expulsion of 1492? 7. What was the Inquisition and how was it used to enforce the policies of the Spanish monarchs? 8. What was the Alhambra and how did its architecture reflect Moorish/ Islamic influences? 9. In what ways was the Holy Roman Empire a New Monarchy? 10. Who was Charles V and what problems did he face during his reign? 12. AP European History • The New Monarchs •J.F. Walters & G.W.Whitton 2 New Monarchs: General Characteristics • provided order ✓civil peace imposed on violent and chaotic societies ✓monarchy offered as a guarantee of law and order • universal nature ✓hereditary monarchy ✓monarchs referred to themselves as “sovereign” • competed for power with nobility/local princes ✓destruction of feudal or common law ✓enlisted support of growing middle class AP European History • The New Monarchs •J.F. Walters & G.W.Whitton 3 New Monarchs: General Characteristics (cont’d) • use of Roman law ✓ welfare of the people is the highest law (salus populi suprema lex) ✓ kings could make and enact law by their own authority: what pleases the prince has the force of law (quod principi placuit legis habet vigorem) ✓ note: Roman law was used in New Monarchies on mainland Europe (“the continent”), but not in England where the English continued to use traditional common law • expanded government bureaucracies ✓ established efficient systems of taxation to raise money for the crown ✓ expanded government agencies to carry out royal laws • encouraged a sense of national identity • established national militaries loyal to the monarchy • NOTE: the “new monarchs” had various degrees of success in establishing these characteristics AP European History • The New Monarchs •J.F.
    [Show full text]
  • League of the Public Weal, 1465
    League of the Public Weal, 1465 It is not necessary to hope in order to undertake, nor to succeed in order to persevere. —Charles the Bold Dear Delegates, Welcome to WUMUNS 2018! My name is Josh Zucker, and I am excited to be your director for the League of the Public Weal. I am currently a junior studying Systems Engineering and Economics. I have always been interested in history (specifically ancient and medieval history) and politics, so Model UN has been a perfect fit for me. Throughout high school and college, I’ve developed a passion for exciting Model UN weekends, and I can’t wait to share one with you! Louis XI, known as the Universal Spider for his vast reach and ability to weave himself into all affairs, is one of my favorite historical figures. His continual conflicts with Charles the Bold of Burgundy and the rest of France’s nobles are some of the most interesting political struggles of the medieval world. Louis XI, through his tireless work, not only greatly transformed the monarchy but also greatly strengthened France as a kingdom and set it on its way to becoming the united nation we know today. This committee will transport you to France as it reinvents itself after the Hundred Years War. Louis XI, the current king of France, is doing everything in his power to reform and reinvigorate the French monarchy. Many view his reign as tyranny. You, the nobles of France, strive to keep the monarchy weak. For that purpose, you have formed the League of the Public Weal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wilted Lily Representations of the Greater Capetian Dynasty Within the Vernacular Tradition of Saint-Denis, 1274-1464
    THE WILTED LILY REPRESENTATIONS OF THE GREATER CAPETIAN DYNASTY WITHIN THE VERNACULAR TRADITION OF SAINT-DENIS, 1274-1464 by Derek R. Whaley A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History at the University of Canterbury, 2017. ABSTRACT Much has been written about representations of kingship and regnal au- thority in the French vernacular chronicles popularly known as Les grandes chroniques de France, first composed at the Benedictine abbey of Saint-Denis in 1274 by the monk Primat. However, historians have ignored the fact that Primat intended his work to be a miroir for the princes—a didactic guidebook from which cadets of the Capetian royal family of France could learn good governance and morality. This study intends to correct this oversight by analysing the ways in which the chroniclers Guillaume de Nangis, Richard Lescot, Pierre d’Orgemont, Jean Juvénal des Ursins, and Jean Chartier constructed moral character arcs for many of the members of the Capetian family in their continua- tions to Primat’s text. This thesis is organised into case studies that fol- low the storylines of various cadets from their introduction in the narrative to their departure. Each cadet is analysed in isolation to deter- mine how the continuators portrayed them and what moral themes their depictions supported, if any. Together, these cases prove that the chron- iclers carefully crafted their narratives to serve as miroirs, but also that their overarching goals shifted in response to the growing political cri- ses caused by the Hundred Years War (1337-1453) and the Armagnac- Burgundian civil war (1405-1435).
    [Show full text]
  • In the Government of France
    THE ROLE OF ISABEAU OF BAVARIA IN THE GOVERNMENT OF FRANCE A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by Colleen Lily Mooney, B.A. The Ohio State University 1973 Approved by TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 CHAPTER I. THE WIFE OF A MAD KING • • • • • • • • 3 CHAPTER II. ISABEAU AS DIPLOMAT AND ARBITRATOR • 29 CHAPTER III. ISABEAU AND LOUIS OF ORLEANS • • • • 66 CHAPTER IV. ISABEAU, THE ARMAGNACS, AND THE BUR- GUNDIANS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 103 CHAPTER V. .AN ENGLISH ALLY UNTIL DEATH • • • • • 139 CONCLUSION • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 157 BIBLIOGRAPHY • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 163 ii INTRODUCTION One crucial transformation in medieval institutions was the growth of royal authority at the expense or indepen­ dent feudal nobles. As the kingdom of France consolidated and royal authority was extended, political power became centered in the person of the king and his bureaucratic advisers. One consequence was the decline or once powerful members of the feudal aristocracy and the queen. In the time of the early Capetians, the queen had been a true partner in power with the king, traveling with him and sharing the same household. But by 1500, she was excluded from power and participation in government, and her intimacy with the ld.ng was undermined by the formation of a separate household. By the thirteenth century the governmental functions of the queen were ceremonial, decorative, or sym­ bolic. Thus it was only under extraordinary circumstances that a queen could gain independent political power, and such was the fate of Isabeau of Bavaria. When she married Charles VI, ld.ng or France, in 1385, he was under a regency controlled by four dukes, but in three years Charles asserted his sole authority by releasing them.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 H-France Salon Vol. 7 (2015), Issue #13, #6 Calm Waters James C
    1 H-France Salon Vol. 7 (2015), Issue #13, #6 Calm waters James C. Collins Georgetown University Fifty years ago, French and American early modernists began the slow process of genuine interpenetration of research agendas and paradigms. The ink on David Pinkney’s famous thesis—in which North American scholars would focus on big picture issues and leave in-depth archival research to our French colleagues, for logistical reasons—was barely dry when air travel revolutionized the relationship of North American scholars to European archives.[1] In those days, references in French historiography to works by American early modernists were few and far between; one of the few French scholars who consistently stayed up-do-date with American work was Roland Mousnier. He not only made reference to the work of historians such as J. Russell Major, but he also regularly reviewed the works of American scholars, such as Orest Ranum or Robert Forster, in major French journals. One of the French Historical Studies (henceforth FHS) forum’s authors, Mousnier’s academic “grandchild” Hugues Daussy, has consistently maintained that tradition in his own work. Among French modernistes of my generation, surely the two most important figures in Franco- American integration have been Robert Descimon and Denis Crouzet. Their contribution has come through their own work, of course, but their insistence, among their students, that young French scholars read and use Anglophone scholarship has had an inestimable influence on the field. Both Robert and Denis have regularly participated in North American conferences, and they have encouraged their students to do so, as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Statutes and Ordinances of the Order of St. Michel in French, Illuminated Manuscript on Parchment France (Probably Paris), C. 1500-1530 (Perhaps C
    Statutes and Ordinances of the Order of St. Michel In French, illuminated manuscript on parchment France (probably Paris), c. 1500-1530 (perhaps c. 1523-1528) i (nineteenth-century added parchment flyleaf) + 40 folios on parchment (collation i 8 [-8, possibly an illuminated frontispiece, no loss of text] ii-iv 8 v 6 vi 4 [-4, cancelled with no loss of text]), no catchwords, a few leaves with leaf and quire signatures with letters designating the quires and roman numerals the leaf, ruled in red ink with the top and bottom rules full across and with full-length single vertical bounding lines, (justification 180 x 125 mm.), copied in an elegant batârde script in twenty-seven long lines, added nineteenth-century flyleaf carefully copied in roman letter in black, red, and blue (possibly using stencils), red rubrics, two- to one-line initials in liquid gold on burgundy and blue grounds heightened with scrolling foliage, dots and floral sprigs in liquid gold, f. 33, six-line blue initial infilled and on a burgundy ground, both heightened with liquid gold scrolls, some spots to first few leaves and small stains to upper edges, ff. 25-38, cockled, else excellent condition with wide and clean margins. Bound in nineteenth-century elaborately gilt-tooled black leather over pasteboards incorporating earlier purple velvet binding as center panels on the front and back covers, gilt-tooled spine with five raised bands, purple silk doublures, in very good condition apart from small splits to spine and scuffs to velvet. Dimensions 265 x 185 mm. Chivalric orders were an important part of political life in many European countries in the late Middle Ages, often continuing into the modern era.
    [Show full text]
  • Dates Et Personnages Clefs ANGLAIS
    HISTORIC OF THE CASTLE-MUSEUM OF NEMOURS MEMORABLE EVENTS AND MAJOR FIGURES House of Villebéon House of Navarre House of Armagnac House of Foix House of Médicis House of Savoie House of Orléans History of the castle of Nemours in key dates During the Middle Ages Around 1150 Gauthier the Ist of Villebéon, chamberlain of Kings of France Louis VII (1120-1137-1180) and Philippe Auguste (1165-1180-1223), begins the construction of the castle of Nemours. 1276 The Villebéon family, ruined by the Crusades, sells their rights to the seigneury to King Philippe III of France (1245-1270-1285). In consequence Nemours, is integrated into the French royal domain. 1404 Nemours becomes a duchy by royal decision. During the modern time 1515 The duchy of Nemours becomes the property of the Savoy family during more than 150 years after briefly belonging to the Medici (1515-1516). 1672 Louis XIV, the “sun king” (1638-1643-1715) gives the duchy to his brother, “Monsieur”, the duke of Orleans (1640-1701). The castle becomes a justice audience. During the Comtemporary Age 1789 Nemours’ status of duchy is given up during the French Revolution. The castle escapes destruction at the hands of the revolutionaries and is sold as a national possession. 1810 The mayor of Nemours buys the castle and gives it to the town the year after with the intention of establishing a public school. 1811-1900 The castle is filled various functions: drying spaces, cellars, school, dance room, auditorium… The town hall should also be installed inside the caste. 1903 On the impulse of three artists from Nemours – J.-C.
    [Show full text]
  • Louis XI's Founding of the French Nation
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 22, Number 17, April 21, 1995 been consciously implemented for the establishment of the nation-state." Louis Xl's founding "As a general policy �"Beaudry �rites, "Louis capital­ of the French nation ized on the initiative of entrepre�eurs and inventors, whom he protected, in agriculture a/> well as industry and commerce. He adopted protectionist and anti-dumping In an article published in EIR on Feb. 17, Lyndon measures to protect grain growers or linen producers; ex­ LaRouche underlined the historical role of France's King empted traders from provincial tariffs, while imposing Louis XI, who ruled from 1461 to 1483. "The principle," tariffs on foreign merchandise; encouraged skilled labor LaRouche wrote, "that every person is made in the image from other countries to come into Dauphine and settle of God, was not introduced efficiently into the practice of there with their families, guaranteeing them tax exemp­ statecraft until the mid-fifteenth-century Council of flor­ tions proportional to their producti�ity . ence and the subsequent establishment of the first modem "The most significant political' change that the king nation-state, the commonwealth of France's King Louis forced through was to bankrupt the feudal landed aristoc­ XI. The notion of commonwealth introduced by Louis XI racy with the creation and defense of industries throughout to France, is the beginning of the existence of the modem the 94 cities of France, and by opening trade with Eng­ form of nation-state. " land, and treaty agreements with Genoa, Florence, Na­ France in the fifteenth century had 14 feudal duchies ples, Sicily, and Calabria.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Louis IX and Holy Roman Emperor Frederick III
    [Expositions 9.2 (2015) 35–79] Expositions (online) ISSN: 1747–5376 Saint Louis IX and Holy Roman Emperor Frederick III THOMAS RENNA Saginaw Valley State University (Emeritus) ABSTRACT Throughout the Middle Ages the French and the Germans have vied with each other in their attempts to integrate the figure of Charlemagne into their perceptions of national identity. Both legacies envisioned Charles the Great as a prototypical Christian ruler, crusader, pilgrim, and promoter of the arts of civilization. But for the French, as exemplified by St. Louis IX (1226–70), Charlemagne remained primarily a role model for their monarchs, including the Valois, and a hero of the chansons de geste. For the Germans, as personified by the Habsburg emperor Frederick III (1440–93), Charlemagne embodied the Roman Empire and the German nation. He was a saint with historical roots going back to the Trojans. Far more than the French, the late medieval Germans emphasized the imperial traditions as they were represented in the memory of Karl der Grosse. “Your holiness is sovereign in Rome, but I am Emperor of Rome.” —to Pope Pius VII, 13 Feb 1806 “I am Charlemagne, the Sword of the Church, and their Emperor [the people of Rome][.]” —to Cardinal Fesch, 18 Feb 18061 Exactly two years earlier in 1804 Napoleon announced that he was Emperor of the French. Throughout that summer the Moniteur ran articles which compared Napoleon to Charlemagne as the restorer of the glory of France, the arts of civilization, and the equality of all people.2 At once the Emperor had combined the French and German understandings of the memory of Charlemagne.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Louies, Part 1
    A List of Louies, Part 1 Numerically you might wonder, which Louis was Saint Louis, who reigned as King of France? And which Louis was the French monarch in 1682 when Louisiana was claimed for France by LaSalle? Which Louis was King of France when New Orleans was founded in 1718? And which one lost his head during the French Revolution? You can’t tell which Louies were “players” without a scorecard. What follows is a fascinating and informative rundown. Louis I (778 – June 20, 840) was known as Louis the Pious, the Fair, and the Debonaire. Makes you wonder, how can one be both pious and debonair? He reigned as King of the Franks and co-emperor with his larger-than-life dad, Charlemagne, from 813. The only surviving adult son of Charlemagne and Hildegard, he was also King of Aquitaine from 781. After his father died in 814, Louis I became the sole ruler of the Franks until his death, except for the period 833–34, during which time he was deposed. As for debonaire, it didn’t mean he was a charming ladies’ man, but “of good disposition” (de bon aire), from whence came the Old French debonaire. Charlemagne and Louis I Louis II, the Stammerer Louis II (November 1, 846 – April 10, 879), known as Louis the Stammerer (in French: Louis le Bègue), was the eldest son of Charles the Bald and Ermentrude of Orléans. He reigned as King of Aquitaine and later King of the West Franks (877), though he was never crowned Emperor. Physically frail, he outlived his father by only two years.
    [Show full text]