DOCSLIB.ORG

Hocking V Director-General of National Archives of Australia [2018] FCA 340 Griffiths J SUMMARY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hocking V Director-General of National Archives of Australia [2018] FCA 340 Griffiths J SUMMARY Hocking v Director-General of National Archives of Australia [2018] FCA 340 Griffiths J SUMMARY In accordance with the practice of the Federal Court in cases of public interest, importance or complexity, particularly in the case of lengthy reasons for judgment, the Court has prepared a summary of the main conclusions of the judgment. The summary is intended to assist in understanding the outcome of this proceeding and is not a complete statement of the conclusions or reasoning of the Court. The only authoritative statement of the Court’s reasons is that contained in the published reasons for judgment which will be available on the internet at the Court’s website. This summary is also available there. These proceedings involve judicial review of a decision by the National Archives of Australia (Archives) to refuse the applicant (Professor Hocking) access under the Archives Act 1983 (Cth) (the Act) to certain records labelled as AA1984/609. The records comprise letters, telegrams and attachments exchanged between the Governor-General of Australia, Sir John Kerr, and Her Majesty The Queen (or Her Private Secretary) during the period 15 August 1974 to 5 December 1977. On Sir John’s instructions, the records were deposited with the then Australian Archives on 26 August 1978 by Mr David Smith, in his capacity as Official Secretary to the Governor-General. The instrument of deposit stated that the records were to remain closed until after 8 December 2037 and, thereafter, were not to be released without prior consultation with the Sovereign’s Private Secretary of the day and the Governor-General’s Official Secretary of the day. Archives refused Professor Hocking’s request for access to the records under the Act on the basis that the records were not “Commonwealth records” as defined in the Act because they were neither “the property of the Commonwealth” or “the property of the official establishment of the Governor-General”. Rather, Archives concluded that the records were Sir John’s personal property and had been lodged with Archives under a special arrangement under s 6(2) of the Act. Accordingly, the records were not subject to the ordinary open access period which applies to Commonwealth records which, generally speaking, means that they are available 30 years after the records came into existence (unless the records are “exempt records” within the meaning of the Act). There is a clear public interest in the content of the records, which relate to one of the most controversial and tumultuous events in the modern history of the nation, namely Sir John Kerr’s dismissal of Prime Minister Gough Whitlam. Importantly, however, the legal issues in the proceeding do not turn on whether there is a public interest in the records being published. Rather, the legal issue is whether Archives erred in its findings that the records were Sir John’s personal property and were not the property of either the Commonwealth or the official establishment of the Governor-General. Resolution of these issues turns on the proper statutory construction of relevant provisions in the Act, which includes legislative history leading up to the passage of the Act and conventions. The Court has determined that the applicant has failed to establish any reviewable error in Archives’ decision. It has determined that private and personal correspondence between Sir John and The Queen (or Her Majesty’s Private Secretary) is sui generis and traditionally has been regarded as the personal property of the correspondents. This view has also been taken in respect of correspondence to and from The Queen with other Governors-General, including Sir Paul Hasluck, Sir Zelman Cowen and Sir Ninian Stephen. The Court has also found that, in providing periodic briefings to The Queen, Sir John Kerr was not exercising the executive power of the Commonwealth under s 61 of the Constitution. The Governor-General performs a wide range of functions, not all of which are performed on the basis of advice from the Prime Minister or the Executive Council. The Court has noted that Archives’ construction of the Act conforms with the view taken in the United Kingdom, where such correspondence (as well as other private and personal records of The Queen) are housed in the Royal Archives and access to them is governed by specific agreements. The Court has also found that the records are not “the property of the official establishment of the Governor-General”. That concept is not defined in the Act, but the Court has found that the “official establishment of the Governor-General” refers to persons who assist and support the Governor-General’s performance of official duties, namely the Official Secretary and his or her staff, as opposed to the position of Governor-General itself. The parties were agreed that, in the event that Professor Hocking was unsuccessful, there should be no order as to costs. Justice Griffiths 16 March 2018 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Institute's Seventieth Volume: the Journal, Its Origins and Its
    Australian Journal of International Affairs ISSN: 1035-7718 (Print) 1465-332X (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/caji20 The Institute’s seventieth volume: the journal, its origins and its engagement with foreign policy debate James Cotton To cite this article: James Cotton (2016): The Institute’s seventieth volume: the journal, its origins and its engagement with foreign policy debate, Australian Journal of International Affairs, DOI: 10.1080/10357718.2016.1167836 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2016.1167836 Published online: 18 May 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 18 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=caji20 Download by: [203.219.87.178] Date: 04 July 2016, At: 18:46 AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2016.1167836 COMMENTARY AND PROVOCATION The Institute’s seventieth volume: the journal, its origins and its engagement with foreign policy debate James Cotton University of New South Wales, ADFA, Canberra, Australia ABSTRACT KEYWORDS Australian Outlook, published initially in 1947, was Australia’s first Australian Institute of journal devoted exclusively to the analysis of Australia’s foreign International Affairs relations and of international affairs. It emerged from a context publications; Australian where nationalist and internationalist sentiments were taking on foreign policy analysis; international relations new prominence and in a time of heightened public awareness of discipline global issues. The journal came to provide a unique venue for academic and expert commentary, especially on the international politics of Australia’s region, as well as on a wide range of topics from defence and trade to great-power dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • A Trial Separation: Australia and the Decolonisation of Papua New Guinea
    A TRIAL SEPARATION A TRIAL SEPARATION Australia and the Decolonisation of Papua New Guinea DONALD DENOON Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Denoon, Donald. Title: A trial separation : Australia and the decolonisation of Papua New Guinea / Donald Denoon. ISBN: 9781921862915 (pbk.) 9781921862922 (ebook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index. Subjects: Decolonization--Papua New Guinea. Papua New Guinea--Politics and government Dewey Number: 325.953 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover: Barbara Brash, Red Bird of Paradise, Print Printed by Griffin Press First published by Pandanus Books, 2005 This edition © 2012 ANU E Press For the many students who taught me so much about Papua New Guinea, and for Christina Goode, John Greenwell and Alan Kerr, who explained so much about Australia. vi ST MATTHIAS MANUS GROUP MANUS I BIS MARCK ARCH IPEL AGO WEST SEPIK Wewak EAST SSEPIKEPIK River Sepik MADANG NEW GUINEA ENGA W.H. Mt Hagen M Goroka a INDONESIA S.H. rk ha E.H. m R Lae WEST MOROBEMOR PAPUA NEW BRITAIN WESTERN F ly Ri ver GULF NORTHERNOR N Gulf of Papua Daru Port Torres Strait Moresby CENTRAL AUSTRALIA CORAL SEA Map 1: The provinces of Papua New Guinea vii 0 300 kilometres 0 150 miles NEW IRELAND PACIFIC OCEAN NEW IRELAND Rabaul BOUGAINVILLE I EAST Arawa NEW BRITAIN Panguna SOLOMON SEA SOLOMON ISLANDS D ’EN N TR E C A S T E A U X MILNE BAY I S LOUISIADE ARCHIPELAGO © Carto ANU 05-031 viii W ALLAC E'S LINE SUNDALAND WALLACEA SAHULLAND 0 500 km © Carto ANU 05-031b Map 2: The prehistoric continent of Sahul consisted of the continent of Australia and the islands of New Guinea and Tasmania.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Governor-General
    Chapter Eight The Role of the Governor-General Sir David Smith, KCVO, AO My brief is to speak about the role of the Governor-General, as we know that office today. I shall speak about the history of the office, about the duties of the office, and about current proposals to alter the Australian Constitution by changing its provisions relating to the office. Foremost among the reasons given for constitutional change is the claim that the republic will give us an Australian Head of State. This claim is as mischievous as it is dishonest. Its success is dependent on the notorious ignorance of the vast majority of Australians about their Constitution. 1 The truth is that Australia has two Heads of State. The Queen is our symbolic Head of State, the Governor-General is our constitutional Head of State, and we have had Australians in the office of Governor-General since Lord Casey's appointment in 1965. The claim that the Governor-General is our constitutional Head of State is not some bizarre theory dreamed up for the purposes of the current debate, for it has been so since the beginning of federation, and there is much supporting evidence, both anecdotal and legal. A Canadian Governor-General, Lord Dufferin, described a Governor-General as a constitutional Head of State in a speech given in 1873. 2 Even Paul Keating referred to the Governor-General as our Head of State in the very speech in which he announced in Parliament on 7 June, 1995 his Government's proposals for the republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Australian Indigenous Histories
    Transgressions critical Australian Indigenous histories Transgressions critical Australian Indigenous histories Ingereth Macfarlane and Mark Hannah (editors) Published by ANU E Press and Aboriginal History Incorporated Aboriginal History Monograph 16 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Transgressions [electronic resource] : critical Australian Indigenous histories / editors, Ingereth Macfarlane ; Mark Hannah. Publisher: Acton, A.C.T. : ANU E Press, 2007. ISBN: 9781921313448 (pbk.) 9781921313431 (online) Series: Aboriginal history monograph Notes: Bibliography. Subjects: Indigenous peoples–Australia–History. Aboriginal Australians, Treatment of–History. Colonies in literature. Australia–Colonization–History. Australia–Historiography. Other Authors: Macfarlane, Ingereth. Hannah, Mark. Dewey Number: 994 Aboriginal History is administered by an Editorial Board which is responsible for all unsigned material. Views and opinions expressed by the author are not necessarily shared by Board members. The Committee of Management and the Editorial Board Peter Read (Chair), Rob Paton (Treasurer/Public Officer), Ingereth Macfarlane (Secretary/ Managing Editor), Richard Baker, Gordon Briscoe, Ann Curthoys, Brian Egloff, Geoff Gray, Niel Gunson, Christine Hansen, Luise Hercus, David Johnston, Steven Kinnane, Harold Koch, Isabel McBryde, Ann McGrath, Frances Peters- Little, Kaye Price, Deborah Bird Rose, Peter Radoll, Tiffany Shellam Editors Ingereth Macfarlane and Mark Hannah Copy Editors Geoff Hunt and Bernadette Hince Contacting Aboriginal History All correspondence should be addressed to Aboriginal History, Box 2837 GPO Canberra, 2601, Australia. Sales and orders for journals and monographs, and journal subscriptions: T Boekel, email: [email protected], tel or fax: +61 2 6230 7054 www.aboriginalhistory.org ANU E Press All correspondence should be addressed to: ANU E Press, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected], http://epress.anu.edu.au Aboriginal History Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic
    Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic Robert J. Bookmiller Gulf Research Center i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uB Dubai, United Arab Emirates (_}A' !_g B/9lu( s{4'1q {xA' 1_{4 b|5 )smdA'c (uA'f'1_B%­'=¡(/ *_D |w@_> TBMFT!HSDBF¡CEudA'sGu( XXXHSDBFeCudC­'?B uG_GAE#­'c`}A' i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uB9f1s{5 )smdA'c (uA'f'1_B%­'cAE/ i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uBª E#'Gvp*E#'B!v,¢#'E#'1's{5%­''tDu{xC)/_9%_(n{wGL­i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uAc8mBmA' , ¡dA'E#'c>EuA'&_{3A'B¢#'c}{3'(E#'c j{w*E#'cGuG{y*E#'c A"'E#'c CEudA%'eC_@c {3EE#'{4¢#_(9_,ud{3' i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uBB`{wB¡}.0%'9{ymA'E/B`d{wA'¡>ismd{wd{3 *4#/b_dA{w{wdA'¡A_A'?uA' k pA'v@uBuCc,E9)1Eu{zA_(u`*­E @1_{xA'!'1"'9u`*1's{5%­''tD¡>)/1'==A'uA'f_,E i_m(#ÆA Gulf Research Center 187 Oud Metha Tower, 11th Floor, 303 Sheikh Rashid Road, P. O. Box 80758, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Tel.: +971 4 324 7770 Fax: +971 3 324 7771 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.grc.ae First published 2009 i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uB Gulf Research Center (_}A' !_g B/9lu( Dubai, United Arab Emirates s{4'1q {xA' 1_{4 b|5 )smdA'c (uA'f'1_B%­'=¡(/ © Gulf Research Center 2009 *_D All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in |w@_> a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, TBMFT!HSDBF¡CEudA'sGu( XXXHSDBFeCudC­'?B mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Gulf Research Center.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of Robert Menzies in the Liberal Party of Australia
    PASSING BY: THE LEGACY OF ROBERT MENZIES IN THE LIBERAL PARTY OF AUSTRALIA A study of John Gorton, Malcolm Fraser and John Howard Sophie Ellen Rose 2012 'A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of BA (Hons) in History, University of Sydney'. 1 Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to acknowledge the guidance of my supervisor, Dr. James Curran. Your wisdom and insight into the issues I was considering in my thesis was invaluable. Thank you for your advice and support, not only in my honours’ year but also throughout the course of my degree. Your teaching and clear passion for Australian political history has inspired me to pursue a career in politics. Thank you to Nicholas Eckstein, the 2012 history honours coordinator. Your remarkable empathy, understanding and good advice throughout the year was very much appreciated. I would also like to acknowledge the library staff at the National Library of Australia in Canberra, who enthusiastically and tirelessly assisted me in my collection of sources. Thank you for finding so many boxes for me on such short notice. Thank you to the Aspinall Family for welcoming me into your home and supporting me in the final stages of my thesis and to my housemates, Meg MacCallum and Emma Thompson. Thank you to my family and my friends at church. Thank you also to Daniel Ward for your unwavering support and for bearing with me through the challenging times. Finally, thanks be to God for sustaining me through a year in which I faced many difficulties and for providing me with the support that I needed.
    [Show full text]
  • An Australian Head of State: an Historical and Contemporary Perspective
    An Australian Head of State: An Historical and Contemporary Perspective An Australian Head of State: An Historical and Contemporary Perspective 1 Sir David Smith Today’s lecture on the topic of ‘An Australian Head of State: An Historical and Contemporary Perspective’ follows the lecture given earlier this year by Senator Baden Teague on the topic of ‘An Australian Head of State: The Contemporary Debate’.2 In his lecture Senator Teague spoke of the Queen as our head of state and argued for her replacement by an Australian head of state. In his replies to questions after the lecture he spoke of the Governor-General as our head of state. The switch from Queen to Governor-General was entirely automatic and unselfconscious. Senator Teague is not alone in his ambivalence. After Mr Bill Hayden’s speech to the Royal Australasian College of Physicians earlier this year, the Australian published an edited version under the heading ‘The Governor-General has made one of the most controversial speeches ever delivered by an Australian head of State’.3 The next day’s editorial in the same newspaper said that ‘it is perfectly appropriate at this stage of our constitutional development that the head of State address important issues of social policy’.4 These media references to the Governor-General as head of state are not just a recent phenomenon: for example, the 1 I am indebted to the Dean of the Faculty of Law, the Australian National University, for his great courtesy in extending to me the hospitality of the Law School to enable me to carry out the research for this lecture and other writings.
    [Show full text]
  • Heir to the Empire: Robert Menzies and the United States of America
    Heir to the Empire: Robert Menzies and The United States of America Fangcheng Yuan A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of BA (Hons) in History University of Sydney 2017 1 Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 3 PREFACE 4 CHAPTER ONE The Forgotten Sceptic 9 “Where the English names persist” CHAPTER TWO 26 CHAPTER THREE A “high destiny” for “Monarchists manqués” 46 CHAPTER FOUR Divergences and Convergences 67 CONCLUSIONS 78 BIBLIOGRAPHY 85 2 Acknowledgements For this project, I am deeply thankful for my supervisor, Professor James Curran, who has inspired my interest in Australian political history and has offered invaluable guidance with much patience and generosity. I would also like to thank my friends, both within and without the honours community, for their interest and encouragements. Finally, this project would not have been possible without the unwavering support and understanding of my parents. 3 Preface The square in front of the Parliament House in Canberra is often, understandably, thronged with tourists. Gazing towards northeast, the design of Canberra’s urban planners was unmistakable—the solemn War Memorial, the grand ANZAC Parade, the modest Old Parliament House, and the current seat of the Parliament are perfectly aligned. A symbolic axis runs through the centres of all of these structures, joining together a young nation’s history, identity, and political life. Somewhere along the axis, between the War Memorial and the Old Parliament House, there could have been added a soaring, stone-built column. But the column, as it is, now stands in a less prominent space on Russell Hill to the east of the axis, on the boundary of the ‘Parliamentary Triangle’.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Conventions and the Headship of State: Australian Experience by Donald Markwell (Redland Bay: Connor Court Publishing, 2016) Pages 1–226
    BOOK REVIEW Constitutional Conventions and the Headship of State: Australian Experience by Donald Markwell (Redland Bay: Connor Court Publishing, 2016) pages 1–226. Price A$49.95 (hardcover). ISBN 978-1-925501-15-5. MICHAEL CROMMELIN AO* Dr Markwell is a prominent scholar in the field of headship of state in Australia and the United Kingdom. This book consists largely of a selection of his extensive writings over a period of more than thirty years in this challeng- ing, changing and contentious field. The selection includes book chapters, journal articles, conference papers, biographical notes, book reviews, public lectures, speeches, addresses, obituaries, opinion pieces and letters to the editors of newspapers. Most items have been published previously, but some have not always been readily accessible. Others have never been published. The book is organised into eight chapters and three appendices. The chap- ter titles provide a good indication of the breadth of the work: ‘Introduction’; ‘Constitutional Conventions and Responsible Government’; ‘The Crown and Australia (1987)’; ‘The Early Governors-General and the Consultation of High Court Judges’; ‘Three Governors-General: Hasluck, Kerr, Cowen’; ‘The 1975 Constitutional Crisis and the Conventions of Responsible Government’; ‘Debating the Headship of State — Monarchy to Republic?’; and ‘The Office of Governor-General (2014)’. Appendix 1 lists the Monarchs, Governors- General, Chief Justices of the High Court, and Prime Ministers since 1901. Appendix 2 is titled ‘Glimpses of Two Modern Governors-General: Dr Peter Hollingworth and Dame Quentin Bryce’. Appendix 3 pays tribute to ‘Two Constitutional Scholars: Sir Kenneth Wheare and Dr Eugene Forsey’. The ‘Introduction’ is new.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Nation and Assimilation: Continuity And
    2 Nation and Assimilation: Continuity and Discontinuity in Aboriginal Affairs in the 1950s Russell McGregor 'Assimilation means that eventually, as they make progress, all the aboriginal people are to live as we do.' I In this succinct formulation, Paul Hasluck, Commonwealth Minister for Territories and leading architect of assimilation policies, registered both assimilation's continuities with earlier policies and its points of novelty. As the model whom Aboriginal people were to emulate, 'we'-white Australians-would clearly remain the source oflegitimacy in political and social relationships. Yet by upholding a vision of social 'progress' and by opening the door to 'our' way oflife to all Aborigines, assimilation entailed a significant shift in the relationship between the settler nation a~d the Indigenous peoples. For the preceding hundred years and more, the dominant view was that Aborigines were innately incapable of 'progress'; that their racial constitution debarred them from ever living 'as we do'; that, indeed, they had little time to live at all, their inherent antipathy to modemity dooming them to extinction.2 Assimilation necessarily entailed a repudiation of the doomed race prognosis, a rejection, or at least dilution, of the long-held assumption of innate Aboriginal primitivity, and some faith in their capacity to become 'civilised' and thereby citizens of a modem national state. To that extent, assimilation was an optimistic doctrine. At the same time, it was profoundly pessimistic about the prospects of Aborigines maintaining existence on any terms other than by living 'as we do'. As a 1958 Commonwealth report explained, assimilation meant 'that to survive and prosper the numerically small aboriginal group, within a vastly larger white Australian group, must leam to live and work and think as the majority do'.3 According to Stuart Macintyre, 'Assimilation has been the aim of govemment policy toward Aborigines for much of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries'.
    [Show full text]
  • International Court of Justice Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru (Nauru V Australia) Memorial of the Republic of Nauru Volume 1 April 1990 ERRATUM
    International Court of Justice Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru (Nauru v Australia) Memorial of the Republic of Nauru Volume 1 April 1990 ERRATUM Memorial Volume 1, Page 241, Line 1, delete the word, 'Nauni', and substitute, 'British' International Court of Justice Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru (Nauru v Australia) Mernorial of the Republic of Nauru Volume 1 April1990 Table of Contents Notes on Sources and Legislation viii Introduction 1 PART 1 AN HISTORICAL ACCOUNT OF NAURU'S RELATIONS WTH EXTERNAL POWERS CHAPTER 1 FROM COLONIZATION TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE MANDATE 5 Section 1. Introduction Section 2. The German Period A. Nauni Placed within the Marshall Islands Protectorate B. Land and the German Administration C. Jaluit Gesellschaft and the Pacific Phosphate Company D. German Mining Laws E. Nauru during World War 1 CHAPTER 2 THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS MANDATE Section 1. Mandate Negotiations Section 2. The Nauru Island Agreement of 1919 and the Establishment of the British Phosphate Comrnissioners Section 3. The Administration of Nauru and the Nauni Island Agreement A. The Administration of Nauru B. The Position of the British Phosphate Comrnissioners C. The Concerns of the United States and Australia's Response: The Bailey Opinion D. The Permanent Mandates Commission CHAPTER 3 THE LANDS ORDINANCES Section 1. Land Rights and Mining Rights under the 1919 Agreement (ii) Section 2. The Lands Ordinance 1921 (Nau) Section 3. The Lands Ordinance 1927 (Nau) Section 4. Impact of the Lands Ordinances CHAPTER 4 FROM THE SECOND WORLD WAR UNTIL INDEPENDENCE Section 1. The Japanese Occupation Section 2. The Transition to Trusteeship Section 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 6, Issue 2
    SPECIAL ISSUE ––– 2011 PERSPECTIVES ON POWER CONFERENCE VOLUME VI ISSUE 11 2013 ISSN: 1833-878X Pages 39-48 Robert O’Shea “Speaking to You on the Birthday of the Nation”: Vice-Regal Rhetoric on Australian Identity ABSTRACT This article considers the effect of vice-regal authority on the formation of Australian identity. A position which was constructed as a ‘Britishness device’ has been appropriated to ‘depict the Australian nation to its people.’ A key opportunity for such advocacy is the Governor-General’s Australia Day address, broadcast since the 1940s. The article will analyse the complex interplay between national and imperial loyalties. ‘Australianness’ was not solely the domain of Australian born viceroys; Field-Marshal William Slim spoke repeatedly about ‘mateship’ and used his military background to propagate the Anzac legend. Just as British born Governors-General used their perspective, in particular their ‘first impressions’ or ‘outback experiences’ to encapsulate Australia, locally born Governors-General saw their role partly as promoting Australia’s British, monarchical heritage, complicating a view of the office as an imperial post which has been successfully ‘indigenised.’ While the power of vice-regal oratory to capture the public imagination has proved limited, examining the content and reception of these addresses over the decades provides a useful indicator of how the phraseology of identity has been transformed. BIOGRAPHY Robert O'Shea is a second-year MA candidate at the University of Melbourne. His thesis examines the Australian Governor-Generalship from 1936 to 1986, assessing the changes in the social status, political influence and public rhetoric of the vice-regal position as the role was transformed from a British imperial figurehead to a largely Australianised, yet still monarchical, constitutional actor.
    [Show full text]