LENINISM WITHOUT LENIN Aproximaciones Al Leninismo Sin Lenin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LENINISM WITHOUT LENIN Aproximaciones Al Leninismo Sin Lenin LENINISM WITHOUT LENIN Aproximaciones al Leninismo sin Lenin By GUSTAVO RODRIGUEZ English Español Confronting the Question of Power, ¿Confrontando la cuestión del Poder o or Promoting the 50th Variant of the programando la quincuagésima vari- Plan to Seize It? ante para tomarlo? Before beginning, I would like to make it clear that I am Ante todo, quiero hacer constar, que escribo estas modestas writing these modest lines with the intention of encourag- líneas con el ánimo de exhortar a la reflexión, más desde la ing reflection, more in the search for the Truth than with búsqueda y el desasosiego que desde el púlpito de la Verdad, de the idea that I am somehow the repository of it. la que no me siento depositario. Dotting the I’s Los puntos sobre las íes The first thing we need to do is to place our subject in the Considero que lo primero que deberíamos hacer, antes de pro- context that gives it its significance: the advance of what I fundizar en el tema que nos ocupa, es ubicar el contexto en el que call “Anarcho”-Bolshevism. éste cobra significado: la avanzada del “anarco”-bolchevismo. This offensive, which has developed over the last decade, Esta ofensiva, que lleva más de una década materializándose, has now conquered many anarchist organizations, taking copando organizaciones anarquistas, adueñándose del cadáver over the corpse of anarcho-syndicalism and appropriating anarco-sindicalista, apropiándose de publicaciones, ateneos, various publications, publishing houses, libraries, social bibliotecas, centro sociales, okupaciones, infoshops, editoriales centers, squats, infoshops, editorials, and initials (often y siglas (otrora vinculadas a luchas históricas del difunto linked with historic struggles of the now defunct workers movimiento obrero), puede constatarse a través de artículos, movement). This process can be traced through many arti- ponencias, reflexiones y comunicados, en infinidad de publica- 42 Leninism | Leninismo English Español cles, reflections, and communiques in an infinite number of ciones creadas para la ocasión y, en diferentes portales elec- publications created for the occasion and on different web- trónicos como Anarkismo.net, A-Info, La Haine, Clajadep, sites, such as Anarkismo,net., A-Info, La Haine, Clajadep, Kaos, entre otros. and Kaos, among others. Desde luego, para concretar dicha “avanzada”, los “anar- In order to promote their advance, the “Anarcho”-Bolsheviks co”-bolcheviques han tenido que echar a andar su propio have had to set in motion their own Frankenstein, in effect, Frankenstein, resucitando “desviaciones” del proyecto reviving past “deviations” of the anarchist project. Specifically, anárquico, propias de ese caminar sin dogma que nos car- we can identify the party-ist Platform of Nestor Makhno (a acteriza, a golpe de ensayo y error y, donde, perfectamente, leader of partisan bands that fought against both the podemos ubicar a La Plataforma partidista de Mackno o, Bolsheviks and the White counterrevolutionaries during the al Partido Liberal Mexicano de los hermanos Flores Civil War in Russia after Magón. Lamentables the Bolshevik Revolution “ensayos” que no of 1917), and the Mexican podemos descontextu- Liberal Party of the Flores alizar y que, indis- Magón brothers. These cutiblemente, were lamentable attempts respondían a las influ- to build anarchist parties encias y confusiones de that we cannot fully ana- su época y, a las necesi- lyze here, but which were dades y demandas de responses to the specific ese particular contexto influences of their epoch histórico. Sin embargo, and to the needs and tampoco se puede demands of the historical obviar que en su propio context in which they tiempo y espacio fueron found themselves. refutados estos tristes Nevertheless, we should “tanteos” desvia- not hide the fact that cionistas y recibieron these projects were refut- duras críticas de parte ed at the time, subjected de los cómplices de la to tough critiques on the Regis Debray Anarquía. part of the partisans of Anarchy. Today, however, the “Anarcho”-Bolsheviks don’t Hoy, los “anarco”-bolcheviques no podían presentarse como lo present themselves as they really are, and for good reason. In que son. No podían (menos a estas alturas del partido) llegar e the past, they were not able to impose explicitly Leninist the- imponer las tesis leninistas. No podían volver a confundir con ses on the anarchist movement: They were not able to con- El Estado y la Revolución. No podían revendernos la fuse people with (Lenin’s) The State and Revolution;nor “Revolución” cubana, ni la joda sandinista ni el “foquismo” ni could they sell the Cuban “Revolution” as anarchist, nor the la “guerra popular prolongada” ni el “necesario” frente popular, experience of the Sandinistas in Nicaragua, nor the NO PODÍAN Y NO PUEDEN. Pero, camuflando al leninismo “Foquismo” of Che Guevara and Regis Debray, nor the con nuevos ropajes “libertarios” han ido consolidando su ofen- “Prolonged People’s War” of Chairman Mao, nor the “necessi- siva. Con esa estrategia van logrado articular sinuosamente una ty" of the Popular Front. They could not do this openly, and red internacional con el único y decidido objetivo de construir they cannot do so today. But, by camouflaging Leninism in “Nuestro Partido”.1 “libertarian” clothes, they have been following essentially the 43 The Utopian English Español same path, pursuing their offensive and consolidating their En Estados Unidos y Canadá, los primeros pasos para la con- gains. With this strategy, they are developing an international strucción de “Nuestro Partido”,datan del verano de 1999, año en network with the sole and decided purpose of constructing que comienzan a gestarse incipientes coordinaciones y difusas what they call “Our Party.”1 redes regionales, específicamente en el área de Québec y Nueva Inglaterra, en un intento de agrupación “bi-nacional” (Canadá- In the United States and Canada, the first steps in the con- EE.UU) motivados por “la insatisfacción mutua ante el estado struction of “Our Party” date back to the summer of 1999, del movimiento anarquista a ambos lados de la frontera “2 y, a during which an initial level of regional coordination and redactarse los borradores iniciales de lo que para abril de 2002, diffuse regional networks, specifically in Quebec and durante el congreso realizado en la ciudad de Boston, MA, se New England, began to develop. These efforts were directed diera a conocer oficialmente como Federación Anarco- toward promoting a “bi-national” regroupment, motivated Comunista del Noreste (NEFAC, por sus siglas en inglés); funda- by the “mutual dissatis- da en “los principios faction with the state of plataformistas de unidad the anarchist move- teórica, unidad táctica, dis- ment on both sides of ciplina, responsabilidad the border,”2 and found colectiva y democracia fruition in April 2002, interna “; a imagen y seme- in the formation, dur- janza del Workers Solidarity ing a congress held in Movement de Irlanda; orga- Boston, of the nización neo-plataformista Northeast Federation of con sede en Dublín, con casi Anarcho-Communists 25 años de existencia. (NEFAC). This organi- zation was founded on Curiosamente, las manio- the “platformist princi- bras tácticas del neo- ples of theoretical and plataformismo irlandés, en tactical unity, disci- Ricardo (left) and Enrique Flores Magón su afán de expansionismo pline, collective respon- geográfico—a la vieja usan- sibility, and internal za bolchevique—han man- democracy,” and modeled after the Workers Solidarity tenido una decidida presencia a lo largo de Norteamérica. Movement of Ireland, a platformist organization, based in Indiscutibles ejemplos son los infructuosos intentos de “con- Dublin, that has been in existence for almost 25 years. trol” en el Encuentro Anarquista de la Ciudad de México y, la reunión internacional denominada Anarkogaláctica, realizada The tactical maneuvers of the Irish neo-platformists, in en la ciudad de San Cristóbal de las Casas, en el estado de their concern for geographic expansion, have been felt Chiapas, México; ambos celebrados en julio del pasado año throughout North America. Some examples are their 2007 y, el forzado Encuentro Nacional Anarquista, efectuado unsuccessful attempt to assert control over the Anarchist recientemente en la ciudad de Guadalajara, a modo de prolon- Encounter in Mexico City; the international meeting, titled gación del Encuentro Anarquista de la Ciudad de México, con Anarkogaláctica, in the city of San Cristóbal de las Casas in la acelerada intención de sacarse de la manga una organización the state of Chiapas, both held in July 2007; and the nacional “anarquista” de clara tendencia neo-plataformista. National Anarchist Encounter, held recently in the city of Guadalajara, promoted as a continuation of the Anarchist Así mismo, encaja en esta estrategia de “Unidad” la reciente Encounter in Mexico City, but with the intention of gira de charlas y entrevistas de Andrew Flood3, por cuarenta y pulling out of the hat a national “anarchist” organization cinco ciudades estadounidenses, donde contacto a grupos, 44 Leninism | Leninismo English Español of clear neo-platformist tendency. Also part of this “Unity” colectivos e individuos anarquistas a quienes entrevistó con la strategy was the recent tour of talks and interviews on the intención de dibujar un “mapa” de tendencias al interior del part of Andrew Flood.3 This took him to 45 cities in the denominado “movimiento” anarquista norteamericano. United States, where he made contact with various anar- Desde luego, es obligatorio hacer las distinciones pertinentes chist groups, collectives, and individuals, with the goal of entre los eventos realizados en México y la gira de charlas en drawing up a “map” of the different tendencies within the EE.UU. Si bien, en el Encuentro Anarquista de la Ciudad de North American anarchist movement. México, solamente se hizo presente el discurso neo- plataformista a través de la ponencia de José Antonio Gutiérrez, It is necessary to distinguish between the events that took a nombre del Workers Solidarity Movement de Irlanda y la place in Mexico and Organización Comunista the speaking tour in Libertaria de Chile, inten- the US.
Recommended publications
  • Black Anarchism, Pedro Riberio
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction.....................................................................................................................2 2. The Principles of Anarchism, Lucy Parsons....................................................................3 3. Anarchism and the Black Revolution, Lorenzo Komboa’Ervin......................................10 4. Beyond Nationalism, But not Without it, Ashanti Alston...............................................72 5. Anarchy Can’t Fight Alone, Kuwasi Balagoon...............................................................76 6. Anarchism’s Future in Africa, Sam Mbah......................................................................80 7. Domingo Passos: The Brazilian Bakunin.......................................................................86 8. Where Do We Go From Here, Michael Kimble..............................................................89 9. Senzala or Quilombo: Reflections on APOC and the fate of Black Anarchism, Pedro Riberio...........................................................................................................................91 10. Interview: Afro-Colombian Anarchist David López Rodríguez, Lisa Manzanilla & Bran- don King........................................................................................................................96 11. 1996: Ballot or the Bullet: The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Electoral Process in the U.S. and its relation to Black political power today, Greg Jackson......................100 12. The Incomprehensible
    [Show full text]
  • {PDF EPUB} Towards a Fresh Revolution by Amigos De Durruti Friends of Durruti
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Towards A Fresh Revolution by Amigos de Durruti Friends of Durruti. Audiobook version of the pamphlet Towards a Fresh Revolution, published by the Friends of Durruti group during the Spanish Civil War. A revolutionary theory (with an introduction by Agustín Guillamón) An article published in July 1937 by The Friends of Durruti, large portions of which appeared in the pamphlet “The Revolutionary Message of the ‘Friends of Durruti’” (PDF) that was translated into English via French. Here it is translated in full directly from Spanish for the first time. Views and Comments No. 44 (April 1963) The No. 44 (April 1963) issue of Views and Comments , an anarcho-syndicalist leaning publication produced out of New York by the Libertarian League from 1955 until 1966. A look at the past: the revolutionary career of Joaquín Pérez – Miguel Amorós. A vivid biographical sketch of Joaquín Pérez (1907-2006), based on a manuscript he wrote during the last few years of his life, who joined the CNT at the age of sixteen in the early 1920s, and was, successively, a specialist in the CNT’s Defense Committees in Barcelona during the 1930s, a militiaman in the Durruti Column during the first months of the Civil War, one of the original members of The Friends of Durruti, a fugitive, a prisoner in Montjuich, and then, after escaping from Montjuich as Franco’s forces closed in on the citadel, an exile, first in labor camps in France, and then, after stowing away on a British warship during the evacuation of Brest, in London.
    [Show full text]
  • Ida Mett – the Kronstadt Uprising
    Ida Mett was born as Ida Markovna Gilman on July 20th, 1901 in Smorgon in the Russian m!ire "now Smarhon#, Belarus)& 'redomin( antly Jewish, the small industrial town was a hotbed of radi*alism& Ida be*ame an anar*hist while studying medi*ine in Moscow& She was soon arrested )or +anti(Soviet a*tivities’ and was e,!elled )rom the *ountry with her -rst husband, .avid /ennenbaum, in 1920& In 1921, Ida was in 'aris& Here she be*ame involved with the Grou! of Russian 3nar*hists 3broad, whi*h in*luded the great -ghter Neestor Makhno, his sometime *ollaborator 'eter 3rshinov, and )ellow anar*ho-syndi*alist Nei*olas 5a6ar7vit*h, who she later married& 3s well as editing the journal, Dielo Truda "9orkers’ :ause%, Mett was one o) the *o-authors of the Grou!#s *ontroversial but infuential +Organisational Platform of the General Union of Anarchists (Draft)# < the 'lat)orm& 19=1 )ound her *elebrating May .ay with anar*hist heroes Buenaventura .urruti and >ran*isco 3scaso in $ar*elona& 'resent at this meeting were also the veteran Russian anar*hist ?oline, 3ugustin Sou*hy "author of With the Peasants of Aragon, available )rom this !ublisher% and :amilo Berneri "murdered by the :ommunists during the Bar*elona May vents of 19=@%& Ba*k in 'aris, Ida served as se*retary o) the local gas workers’ union, all the time writing and agitating, being arrested many times. It was in this !eriod that the booklet you are reading now was written& 3Aer the >all o) >ran*e in 1900, Mett was briefy interned by the ?i*hy regime in Rieu*ros *am!, be)ore the renegade :ommunist Boris Souvarine su**essfully arranged her release& She spent the rest of the war, with her husband and their ten year old son Mar*, in 5a Garde(>reinet, a quiet mountain village near the :ôte d#36ur& Returning to 'aris, !ost(war Ida worked as a nurse in a sanat( orium )or Jewish *hildren in Brunoy, and later as a translator& She was never able to !ra*ti*e as a doctor be*ause her Buali-*ations were not re*ognised by the authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Anarchism: the Makhnovist Movement in the Ukraine, 1917Â
    Phi Alpha Theta Pacific Northwest Conference, 8–10 April 2021 Zion G. Flores, Eastern Washington University, undergraduate student, “Practical Anarchism: The Makhnovist Movement in the Ukraine, 1917–1921” Abstract: Anarchism was one of the most prominent revolutionary left-wing movements in 19th and 20th century Europe, even contending as a philosophy with Marxism in many socialist circles. However, anarchism is generally believed today to be unrealistic and impractical as a political ideology. When looking at the modern historical record though, this does not always seem to be the case. I plan to explore whether the Makhnovist movement in the Ukraine from 1917-1921 provides an exception to the idea that anarchist movements are never viable. This movement, guided in large part by anarcho-communist Nestor Makhno, was one of the first to take modern anarchism from theory into practice. Although its existence was brief and its ability to fully realize anarchist ideals was limited by the circumstances of the time, the question must be asked: does the Makhnovist movement serve as an example of practical anarchism? Practical Anarchism The Makhnovist Movement in the Ukraine, 1917-1921 Zion G. Flores Eastern Washington University [email protected] Undergraduate 1 On March 2, 1917, Nestor Makhno took his first steps outside the Butyrki Prison of Moscow in over eight years. As Russia was being delivered from the chains of Tsardom, so too was Makhno delivered from his imprisonment as a part of the emancipation of prisoners during the February Revolution.1 His body emerged weak and weary from the debilitating conditions of his imprisonment.2 His commitment to anarchism, his rebellious spirit, and his fervor to emancipate toiling people from “slavery under the yoke of State and Capital” however had only grown stronger despite the seemingly hopeless prospects.
    [Show full text]
  • An Anarchist FAQ — Section I Contents
    An Anarchist FAQ — Section I Contents Section I: What would an anarchist society look like? 4 I.1 Isn’t libertarian socialism an oxymoron? 12 I.1.1 Is socialism impossible? ................................ 17 I.1.2 Is libertarian communism impossible? ........................ 27 I.1.3 What is wrong with markets anyway? ........................ 39 I.1.4 If capitalism is exploitative, then isn't socialism as well? . 45 I.1.5 Does capitalism efficiently allocate resources? .................... 48 I.2 Is this a blueprint for an anarchist society? 62 I.2.1 Why discuss what an anarchist society would be like at all? . 66 I.2.2 Will it be possible to go straight to an anarchist society from capitalism? . 68 I.2.3 How is the framework of an anarchist society created? . 72 I.3 What could the economic structure of anarchy look like? 79 I.3.1 What is a "syndicate"? ................................. 83 I.3.2 What is workers' self-management? ......................... 90 I.3.3 What does socialisation mean? ............................ 96 I.3.4 What relations would exist between individual syndicates? . 102 I.3.5 What would confederations of syndicates do? . 106 I.3.6 What about competition between syndicates? . 113 I.3.7 What about people who do not want to join a syndicate? . 118 I.3.8 Do anarchists seek "small autonomous communities, devoted to small scale produc- tion"? .......................................... 119 I.4 How would an anarchist economy function? 123 I.4.1 What is the point of economic activity in anarchy? . 127 I.4.2 Why do anarchists desire to abolish work? . 129 I.4.3 How do anarchists intend to abolish work? .
    [Show full text]
  • Inceorganisinganarchy2010.Pdf
    ORGANISING ANARCHY SPATIAL STRATEGY , PREFIGURATION , AND THE POLITICS OF EVERYDAY LIFE ANTHONY JAMES ELLIOT INCE THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY QUEEN MARY , UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2010 0 ABSTRACT This research is an analysis of efforts to develop a politics of everyday life through embedding anarchist and left-libertarian ideas and practices into community and workplace organisation. It investigates everyday life as a key terrain of political engagement, interrogating the everyday spatial strategies of two emerging forms of radical politics. The community dimension of the research focuses on two London-based social centre collectives, understood as community-based, anarchist-run political spaces. The Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), an international trade union that organises along radical left-libertarian principles, comprises the workplace element. The empirical research was conducted primarily through an activist-ethnographic methodology. Based in a politically-engaged framework, the research opens up debates surrounding the role of place-based class politics in a globalised world, and how such efforts can contribute to our understanding of social relations, place, networks, and political mobilisation and transformation. The research thus contributes to and provides new perspectives on understanding and enacting everyday spatial strategies. Utilising Marxist and anarchist thought, the research develops a distinctive theoretical framework that draws inspiration from both perspectives. Through an emphasis on how groups seek to implement particular radical principles, the research also explores the complex interactions between theory and practice in radical politics. I argue that it is in everyday spaces and practices where we find the most powerful sources for political transformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Anarchism and Organisation
    Social Anarchism and Organisation by Federação Anarquista do Rio de Janeiro ‐ FARJ English translation of Anarquismo Social e Organização, by the Anarchist Federation of Rio de Janeiro (Federação Anarquista do Rio de Janeiro – FARJ), Brazil, approved at the 1st FARJ Congress, held on 30th and 31st of August 2008. Federação Anarquista do Rio de Janeiro j 1 The first Congress of the FARJ was held with the principal objective of deepening our reflections on the question of organisation and formalising them into a programme. This debate has been happening within our organisation since 2003. We have produced theoretical materials, established our thinking, learned from the successes and mistakes of our political practice it was becoming increasingly necessary to further the debate and to formalise it, spreading this knowledge both internally and externally. The document “Social Anarchism and Organisation” formalises our positions after all these reflections. More than a purely theoretical document, it reflects the conclusions realised after five years of practical application of anarchism in the social struggles of our people. The document is divided into 16 parts. It has already been published in Portuguese in a book co-published between Faísca and the FARJ. Document approved at the 1st Congress, held on 30th and 31st of August 2008 The first Congress of the Anarchist Federation of Rio de Janeiro pays tribute to its comrades: Juan Perez Bouzas (1899-1958) Featured anarchist cobbler of Galician origin that, with unusual talent and determination, highlighted the necessity of the deepening of the struggle. In 2008 we remember the fiftieth anniversary of his death (05/09/1958).
    [Show full text]
  • Georges Fontenis Papers 1945-1975 (-2010)1945-1975
    Georges Fontenis Papers 1945-1975 (-2010)1945-1975 International Institute of Social History Cruquiusweg 31 1019 AT Amsterdam The Netherlands hdl:10622/ARCH00422 © IISH Amsterdam 2021 Georges Fontenis Papers 1945-1975 (-2010)1945-1975 Table of contents Georges Fontenis Papers................................................................................................................ 3 Context............................................................................................................................................... 3 Content and Structure........................................................................................................................3 Access and Use.................................................................................................................................4 Allied Material.....................................................................................................................................4 Provisional list...................................................................................................................................5 International Institute of Social History 2 Georges Fontenis Papers 1945-1975 (-2010)1945-1975 Georges Fontenis Papers Collection ID ARCH00422 Creator Fontenis, Georges Period 1945-1975 (-2010)1945-1975 Period (bulk) 1945-1975 Extent 0.75 m. Language list English Language of Material French Context Biographical Note Born in Paris 1920, died in Tours, France 2010; teacher; anarchist; during the Second World War active in the underground
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Octubre Mujer Y Memoria
    1 MUJER Y MEMORIA OCTUBRE --------------------- 31 DE OCTUBRE JUANA ROUCO BUELA El 31 de octubre de 1969 muere en Buenos Aires (Argentina) la anarcosin- dicalista y propagandista anarcofemi- nista Juana Buela, más conocida como Juana Rouco Buela. Había nacido el 19 de abril de 1889 en Madrid (España). Cuando tenía cuatro años quedó huér- fana de padre, viviendo en la miseria; nunca fue a la escuela. El 24 de julio de 1900 llegó como emigrante en Argen- tina con su madre, donde ya vivía un hermano 10 años mayor que ella, Ci- riaco, y desde muy joven entró a formar parte del movimiento libertario y anar- cosindicalista de la mano de éste, que también lo enseñó a leer y a escribir. En 1904 participó activamente en los actos del Primero de Mayo, que fueron duramente reprimidos, y que acabaron con la vida del fogonero marítimo de 22 años Ocampo. En 1905 asistió, con el apoyo de Fran- cisco Llaqué, secretario del Consejo Federal y redactor del periódico La Protesta, como delegada indirecta en representación de los obreros de la Refinería Argentina de Azúcar de Rosario, entonces en huelga, en el V Congreso de la Federación Obrera de la Región Argentina (FUERA), donde proclamó claramente que la finali- dad de la federación obrera es el comunismo anarquista. En 1907 entra a formar parte, con María Collazo, Virginia Bolten, Marta Neweels- tein, Teresa Caporaletti y otras, del grup creador del primer local libertario de mu- jeres del país («Centro Femenino Anarquista»), que tenía como sede la Sociedad de Resistencia de Conductores de Carros, participa energicament en la Huelga de Inquilinos de aquel año para protestar por la subida de los alquileres y los desalo- jos.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Search for a Libertarian Communism: Daniel Guérin and The
    The search for a libertarian communism: Daniel Guérin and the ‘synthesis’ of marxism and anarchism I have a horror of sects, of compartmentalisation, of people who are separated by virtually 1 nothing and who nevertheless face each other as if across an abyss. – Daniel Guérin Concerned that his reinterpretation of the French Revolution, La Lutte de classes sous la Première République (1946), had been misunderstood, Daniel Guérin wrote to his friend, the socialist Marceau Pivert in 1947 that the book was to be seen as ‘an introduction to a synthesis of anarchism and Marxism-Leninism I would like to write one day.’2 This paper aims to analyze exactly what Guérin meant by this ‘synthesis’, and how and why he came to be convinced of its necessity—for as Alex Callinicos has commented, ‘[g]enuinely innovative syntheses are rare and difficult to arrive at. Too often attempted syntheses amount merely to banality, incoherence, or eclecticism.’3 It must however be noted from the outset that Guérin had no pretensions to being a theorist: he saw himself first and foremost as an 1 Daniel Guérin, Front populaire, Révolution manquée. Témoignage militant (Arles: Editions Actes Sud, 1977), p. 29. All translations are the present author’s, unless stated otherwise. 2 Letter to Marceau Pivert, 18 November 1947, Bibliothèque de Documentation Internationale Contemporaine (hereafter BDIC), Fonds Guérin, F°Δ Rés 688/10/2. La Lutte de classes sous la Première République, 1793-1797 (Paris: Gallimard, 1946; new edition 1968), 2 vols. 3 Alex Callinicos (ed.), Marxist Theory (Oxford University Press, 1989), p. 108.
    [Show full text]
  • Anarchisme Français De 1950 À 1970 1
    Anarchisme français de 1950 à 1970 1 Cédric Guérin Introduction “ Y en a pas un sur cent et pourtant ils existent La plupart fils de rien ou bien fils de si peu Qu’on ne les voit jamais que lorsqu’on a peur d’eux. ” C’est le 10 mai 1968, pendant la nuit des barricades, que Léo Ferré créa sa célèbre chanson “ Les anarchistes ”. Ce couplet traduit dans une certaine mesure la surprise des observateurs attentifs à la renaissance du drapeau noir lors des manifestations et des défilés de Mai. L’antibureaucratisme, l’autogestion, la spontanéité révolutionnaires sont autant de mots qui donnent à la révolte de Mai 1968 un caractère libertaire, et Edgar Morin peut écrire : “ C’est la renaissance intellectuelle de l’anarchisme, teinté de marxisme et de situation-nisme. ” Paradoxalement, c’est un fait acquis que les organisations “ officielles ” ne sont pas ou pratiquement pas intervenues dans les événements, alors que ceux-ci témoignent d’une indéniable présence intellectuelle de l’anarchisme ; même si on peut s’interroger sur la nature de l’anarchisme estudiantin décrit par Morin. Cette apparente contradiction entre l’inaction des organisations et l’explosion des thèmes libertaires détermine dans une large mesure le caractère spécifique de l’anarchisme, révolte à la fois individuelle et collective. Les traits de l’anarchisme sont difficiles à cerner. Ses “ maîtres ” n’ont presque jamais condensé leurs pensées en des traits systématiques. Quand, à l’occasion, ils en ont fait l’essai, ça n’a été qu’en de minces brochures de propagande et de vulgarisation, où n’en affluent que des bribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Anarchist Organisation Not Leninist Vanguardism
    Wayne Price Anarchist Organisation not Leninist Vanguardism 2006 The Anarchist Library Contents Why an Anarchist Organization is Needed. But Not a “Van- guard Party”.............................. 3 The Anarchist Revolutionary Political Organization...... 4 The Leninist Party.......................... 7 The Myth of the Bolshevik Revolution.............. 9 Conclusion............................... 10 References ............................... 11 2 Why an Anarchist Organization is Needed. But Not a “Vanguard Party” Right now only a few people are revolutionary anarchists. The big majority of people reject anarchism and any kind of radicalism (if they think about it at all). For those of us who are anarchists, a key question concerns the relationship between the revolutionary minority (us) and the moderate and (as- yet) nonrevolutionary majority. Shall the revolutionary minority wait for the laws of the Historical Process to cause the majority (at least of the working class) to become revolutionary, as some propose? In that case, the minority really does not have to do anything. Or does the minority of radicals have to organize itself in order to spread its liberatory ideas, in cooperation with the historical process? If so, should the revolutionary minority organize itself in a top-down, centralized, fashion, or can it organize itself as a radically democratic federation, consistent with its goal of freedom? Perhaps the most exciting tendency on the left today is the growth of pro-organizational, class struggle, anarchism. This includes international Plat- formism, Latin American especifismo, and other elements (Platformism is in- spired by the 1926 Organizational Platform of the General Union of Anarchists; in Skirda, 2002). Even some Trotskyists have noticed, “ ‘Platformism’ [is] one of the more left-wing currents within contemporary anarchism.
    [Show full text]