DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Endline Evaluation of The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

[Type here] Final Endline Evaluation of the Philippines Cold Chain Project (PCCP) USDA Food for Progress (FFPr) Program Implemented by Winrock International September 2013 – April 2019 Program: Food for Progress Funding Year: 2013 Agreement Number:FCC-492-2013/032/00, Submitted May 22, 2019. Final Revision and Submission October 15, 2019. This document, submitted for review by the United States Department of Agriculture, was prepared by Asian Social Project Services, Inc. for Winrock International under USDA Agreement No. OSGM FCC-492-2013/032/00, Philippines Cold Chain Project (PCCP). It was prepared by an independent third-party evaluation firm. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Department of Agriculture or the United States Government. Accessibility Note: An accessible version of this document can be made available by contacting [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary ...............................................................................................................1 II. Project Purpose and Background ...........................................................................................4 A. Results Framework .........................................................................................................4 B. Project Activities .............................................................................................................5 C. Partnerships .....................................................................................................................6 III. Research Methodology ...........................................................................................................8 A. Key Evaluation Questions ...............................................................................................8 B. Sample Sizes ...................................................................................................................8 1. Beneficiary-Based Survey .......................................................................................8 2. Producer Groups ......................................................................................................9 C. Data Collection Methods.................................................................................................9 1. Beneficiary-Based Field Survey ............................................................................10 2. Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) ...........................................................................10 3. Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) .........................................................................10 4. Secondary data .......................................................................................................10 D. Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Methods ...........................................................10 1. Quantitative analysis methods ...............................................................................10 2. Qualitative analysis methods .................................................................................11 E. Study Limitations ..........................................................................................................12 IV. Key Findings ........................................................................................................................13 A. Profile of Beneficiary Farmers ......................................................................................13 B. Overall Outcomes for Beneficiary Producers ...............................................................13 1. Increased Agricultural Productivity (FFPr SO1) ...................................................13 C. Key Evaluation Questions .............................................................................................14 1. Application of New Technologies and Management Practices .............................14 2. Collective Actions by Producer Organizations ......................................................23 3. Financing as a Tool for Investment .......................................................................26 4. In-Kind Grants for Cold Chain and Storage Facilities ...........................................30 5. Business and Supply Chain Management of IKG-Supported Facilities ................36 6. Public-Private Partnerships for Cold Chain Investments.......................................39 7. Market Relationships and Trade ............................................................................43 8. Pathways to Sustainability .....................................................................................47 V. Conclusions ..........................................................................................................................48 VI. Lessons Learned and Recommendations .............................................................................49 VII. References ............................................................................................................................50 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Map of PCCP provinces ..........................................................................................................................................6 Figure 2. Mango Producers: Learning and application of technologies & techniques (n=40) .............................................16 Figure 3. Banana Producers: Learning and application of technologies & techniques (n=39) ............................................17 Figure 4. Vegetable producers: Learning and adoption of technologies & techniques (n=100) ..........................................18 Figure 5. Swine producers: Learning and application of technologies and techniques (n=239) ..........................................19 Figure 6. Lobster and other crustacean producers: Learning and application of technologies & techniques (n=105) ........20 Figure 7. Fin fish producers: Learning and application of improved technologies & techniques (n=62) ............................21 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Targeted commodities by province...........................................................................................................................5 Table 2. Beneficiary-based survey: Numbers of producers interviewed ................................................................................9 Table 3. Commodities and PCCP-supported facilities selected for value-chain mapping ...................................................11 Table 4. Lending to PCCP beneficiaries by financial institution..........................................................................................27 Table 5. Overview of post-harvest facilities supported by PCCP in-kind grants .................................................................32 Table 6. Estimated total volume and value of trade for PCCP producers ............................................................................43 Table 7. Increased sales prices ..............................................................................................................................................44 LIST OF ANNEXES1 Annex 1. PCCP Results Framework and Selected Outcomes Annex 2. Research Methodology Annex 3. Data Gathering Instruments Annex 4. Input Sources Annex 5. Production and Cost Function Analysis Annex 6. Mean Difference Analysis Annex 7. Total Volume and Value of Trade Annex 8. Partial Budget Analysis Annex 9. Loans to Beneficiaries Annex 10. Focus Group Discussion Reports Annex 11. In-Kind Grant Facilities and Equipment Annex 12. Value Chain Mapping Annex 13. Photo Documentation 1 Please note: Annexes appear in a separate document submitted as part of this report. ACRONYMS ABCAO Association of Butuan City Aqua-culture Operators AFPC Agusan Del Sur Farmers Producers Cooperative AGRUFAPCO Ambukal Group of Upland Farmers Producers Association AKKA Angat Kabuhayan para sa Kalusugan Association ALVEFA Alegra Vegetable Farmers Association AMFD/MFCOA Association of Masao Fisherfolks Development AMPA Aclan Mango Producers Association ARCs Agrarian Reform Communities AROMA Animal Raisers Organization of Marihatag ASPSI Asian Social Project Services, Inc. ASRA Angas Swine Raisers Association BAHIVEGA Bayugan High Value Grower Association BALLPA Barangay Lisondra Lobster Producers Association BASPFA Barangay San Pedro Fisherfolks Association BBLCA Barangay BayBay Lobster Culturist Association BBS Beneficiary-Based Sampling BFAD Bureau of Food and Drugs BFAR Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources BFFA Benglen Farmers and Fishermen Association BOFIA Baleguian Organic Farmers Irrigators Association BTHRA Barangay Trinidad Hog Raisers Association BVGA Burbuanan Vegetable Growers Association CAMFFIA Cambas-ac Farmers and Fisherfolks Association CARAGA Caraga Administrative Region CBOs Commnunity-Based Organizations CCAP Cold Chain Alliance of the Philippines CFMPC Camagong Farmers Multi-Purpose Cooperative CLGRO Cabuang-an Lobster and Grouper Raiser Association CLWA Crossing Luna Womens Association CMPC Culit Multi-Purpose Cooperative CMPMC Carmen Mango Processing and Marketing Center CONFARCA Consuelo Farmers Credit Association CPAPFAI Centro, Punta, Asinan, Pilaring Fisherfolks Association, Inc. CRIMC Caraga Regional Integrated Marketing Center CROBEVP-MPC Crossing Luna Beawan Vegetable Producers Multi-Purpose Cooperative CVGA Cuarinta Vegetable Grower Association DA Department of Agriculture DAR Department of Agrarian Reform
Recommended publications
  • Lanao Del Norte – Homosexual – Dimaporo Family – Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF)

    Lanao Del Norte – Homosexual – Dimaporo Family – Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF)

    Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: PHL33460 Country: Philippines Date: 2 July 2008 Keywords: Philippines – Manila – Lanao Del Norte – Homosexual – Dimaporo family – Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) This response was prepared by the Research & Information Services Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. This research response may not, under any circumstance, be cited in a decision or any other document. Anyone wishing to use this information may only cite the primary source material contained herein. Questions 1. Please provide references to any recent, reliable overviews on the treatment of homosexual men in the Philippines, in particular Manila. 2. Do any reports mention the situation for homosexual men in Lanao del Norte? 3. Are there any reports or references to the treatment of homosexual Muslim men in the Philippines (Lanao del Norte or Manila, in particular)? 4. Do any reports refer to Maranao attitudes to homosexuals? 5. The Dimaporo family have a profile as Muslims and community leaders, particularly in Mindanao. Do reports suggest that the family’s profile places expectations on all family members? 6. Are there public references to the Dimaporo’s having a political, property or other profile in Manila? 7. Is the Dimaporo family known to harm political opponents in areas outside Mindanao? 8. Do the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) recruit actively in and around Iligan City and/or Manila? Is there any information regarding their attitudes to homosexuals? 9.
  • Detailed Landslide and Flood Hazard Map of Jabonga

    Detailed Landslide and Flood Hazard Map of Jabonga

    II NN DD EE XX MM AA PP :: DETAILED LANDSLIDE AND FLOOD HAZARD MAP OF 125°25'0"E 125°30'0"E 4019-I-4 4019-I-5 4119-IV-1 MAINIT JABONGA, AGUSAN DEL NORTE; MALIMONO KITCHARAO AND MALIMONO AND MAINIT, SURIGAO DEL NORTE PHILIPPINES KITCHARAO 4019-I-9 4019-I-10 4119-IV-6 9°25'0"N 4019-I-10 BUNGA QUADRANGLE 9°25'0"N JABONGA 125°27'0"E 125°28'0"E 125°29'0"E 125°30'0"E 4019-I-15 4119-IV-11 Purok III Mahogany (Karihatag)# 125°25'0"E 125°30'0"E 9°27'0"N 9°27'0"N Purok IV Malbago (Karihatag)# 0 2 1 Karihatag Elem. School #P n( ) KARIHATAG Purok VII# Naga (Karihatag)# μ 0120.5 Kilometers 4 8 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 LL E G E N D : Main road POBLACIONP! Barangay center location So. Magaling Secondary road (Poblacion)# Purok/Sitio location (Barangay) 180 3 40 Track; trail n 0 School 8 4 River v® Hospital Municipal boundary G Church Purok IB Purok II 0 500 0 (Bunga) (Bunga) 5 # # 80 Contour (meter) Proposed relocation site BUNGA 2 0 60 P 6 0 4 2 4 Purok IA (Bunga) LAKE MAINIT Landslide 0 # 52 9°26'0"N 9°26'0"N Very high landslide susceptibility 0 0 30 2 8 1 Areas usually with steep to very steep slopes and underlain by 3 0 0 5 0 32 0 0 0 4 0 6 0 4 1 1 weak materials.
  • Socio-Economics, Institutional Support, and Intervention Programs Toward Sustainable Fisheries Management in Lake Mainit, Philippines

    Socio-Economics, Institutional Support, and Intervention Programs Toward Sustainable Fisheries Management in Lake Mainit, Philippines

    Socio-Economics, Institutional Support, and Intervention Programs Toward Sustainable Fisheries Management in Lake Mainit, Philippines Asuncion B. De Guzman, Alita E. Openiano, Marilou M. Ologuin and Jeanette J. Samson Mindanao State University at Naawan, 9023 Naawan, Misamis Oriental E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Lake Mainit is an important natural resource shared by two provinces in northern Mindanao, Surigao del Norte and Agusan del Norte, notable for being the deepest and the fourth largest lake in the Philippines. This wetland ecosystem supports a thriving freshwater fishery and the livelihood of more than 4,000 fishers. At least 19 types of traditional and ingenious modifications of fishing gears are used. On the average Lake Mainit fishers earn an estimated monthly income of Php4,340 which falls below the poverty threshold for an average family in rural Philippines. Part of a comprehensive resource assessment project in Lake Mainit is a socio- economic profiling and appraisal of the numerous intervention programs in fisheries management and livelihood development introduced into the lakeshore communities in an attempt to improve the ecological and socio-economic situation around the lake. The results of this assessment will provide the scientific basis for formulating a comprehensive fisheries management plan for Lake Mainit that shall, in turn, be integrated into the Lake Mainit Development Alliance (LMDA) development agenda to help restore Lake Mainit fisheries to sustainable levels by addressing issues on declining water quality, regulation of fishing effort, and decreasing fisher income. Keywords: Lake Mainit, socio-economics, management issues, intervention programs, LMDA. INTRODUCTION Lake Mainit is an ecologically important resource within two provincial jurisdictions in the Caraga Region, namely, Agusan del Norte and Surigao del Norte, bordered by eight municipalities that comprise the Lake Mainit Watershed (Fig.
  • First Quarter of 2019

    First Quarter of 2019

    TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Macroeconomic Performance . 1 Inflation . 1 Consumer Price Index . 1 Purchasing Power of Peso . 2 Labor and Employment . 2 II. Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery Sector Performance . 3 Crops . 3 Palay . 3 Corn . 3 Fruit Crops . 4 Vegetables . 4 Non-food and Industrial and Commercial Crops . 5 Livestock and Poultry . 5 Fishery . 6 Forestry . 6 III. Trade and Industry Services Sector Performance . 8 Business Name Registration . 8 Export . 8 Import . 9 Manufacturing . 9 Mining . 10 IV. Services Sector Performance . 11 Financing . 11 Tourism . 12 Air Transport . 12 Sea Transport . 13 Land Transport . 13 V. Peace and Security . 15 VI. Development Prospects . 16 MACROECONOMIC PERFORMANCE Inflation Rate Figure 1. Inflation Rate, Caraga Region The region’s inflation rate continued to move at a slower pace in Q1 2019. From 4.2 percent in December 2018, it declined by 0.5 percentage point in January 2019 at 3.7 percent (Figure 1) . It further decelerated in the succeeding months, registering 3.3 percent in February and 2.9 percent in March. This improvement was primarily due to the slow movement in the monthly increment in the price Source: PSA Caraga indices of heavily-weighted commodity groups, such as food and non-alcoholic beverages; Figure 2. Inflation Rate by Province housing, water, electricity, gas and other fuels; and transport. The importation of rice somehow averted the further increase in the market price of rice in the locality. In addition, the provision of government subsidies particularly to vulnerable groups (i.e. DOTr’s Pantawid Pasada Program) and free tuitions under Republic Act No.
  • Typhoon Bopha (Pablo)

    Typhoon Bopha (Pablo)

    N MA019v2 ' N 0 ' Silago 3 0 ° 3 0 ° 1 0 Philippines 1 Totally Damaged Houses Partially Damaged Houses Number of houses Number of houses Sogod Loreto Loreto 1-25 2-100 717 376 Loreto Loreto 26-250 101-500 San Juan San Juan 251-1000 501-1000 1001-2000 1001-2000 2001-4000 2001-4000 Cagdianao Cagdianao 1 N ° N San Isidro 0 ° Dinagat 1 0 Dinagat San Isidro Philippines: 1 5 Dinagat (Surigao del Norte) Dinagat (Surigao 5 del Norte) Numancia 280 Typhoon Bopha Numancia Pilar Pilar Pilar Pilar (Pablo) - General 547 Surigao Dapa Surigao Dapa Luna General Totally and Partially Surigao Surigao Luna San San City Francisco City Francisco Dapa Dapa Damaged Housing in 1 208 3 4 6 6 Placer Placer Caraga Placer Placer 10 21 Bacuag Mainit Bacuag (as at 9th Dec 5am) Mainit Mainit 2 N 1 Mainit ' N 0 ' 3 0 ° Map shows totally and partially damaged 3 9 Claver ° 9 Claver housing in Davao region as of 9th Dec. 33 Bohol Sea Kitcharao Source is "NDRRMC sitrep, Effects of Bohol Sea Kitcharao 10 Typhoon "Pablo" (Bopha) 9th Dec 5am". 3 Province Madrid Storm track Madrid Region Lanuza Tubay Cortes ! Tubay Carmen Major settlements Carmen Cortes 513 2 127 21 Lanuza 10 Remedios T. Tandag Tandag City Tandag Remedios T. Tandag City Romualdez 3 Romualdez 15 N ° N 13 9 ° Bayabas 9 Buenavista Sibagat Buenavista Sibagat Bayabas Carmen Carmen Butuan 53 200 Butuan 127 Butuan 21 Butuan 3 City City Cagwait Cagwait 254 Prosperidad 12 17 Gingoog Buenavista 631 Gingoog Buenavista Marihatag Marihatag 43 1 38 19 San Las Nieves San Agustin Las Nieves Agustin 57 Prosperidad 56 2 4 0 10
  • 1St Technical Report 2006

    1St Technical Report 2006

    Type of Report: First Technical Report Executing Sustainable Ecosystem International Agency: Corp. (SUSTEC) Ordinal Number: PD 167/02 Rev. 2 (F) Title of Project: Integration of Forest Management Units (FMU) into a Sustainable Development Unit (SDU) through Collaborative Forest Management in Surigao del Sur, The Philippines Period Covered: November 2004 – June 2006 Place and date of Quezon City, Philippines issue: June 31, 2006 KEY PROJECT STAFF Project Director: Ricardo M. Umali Assistant Project Director: Bernardo D. Agaloos, Jr. Field Coordinator: Feliciano T. Opeña Administrative / Finance Officer: Rhodora G. Padilla CONSULTANTS INVOLVED (THIS REPORT): Team Leader and NRM Specialist: Dr. J. Adolfo V. Revilla, Jr. Conservation Planning Specialist Dr. Emmanuel R. G. Abraham GIS / Remote Sensing Specialist Dr. Nathaniel C. Bantayan Forest Management Specialist Dr. Jeremias A. Canonizado Watershed Management Specialist Dr. Rex Victor O. Cruz Institutional/ Rural Development Specialist Prof. Rodegelio B. Caayupan Environmental Lawyer / Legal Specialist Atty. Eleno O. Peralta Natural Resource Economist Dr. Nicos D. Perez Sociologist / IEC Specialist Dr. Cleofe S. Torres Agro-forestry/ Livelihood Specialist Dr. Neptale Q. Zabala SUPPORT STAFF: GIS Technical Staff Angelito O. Arjona Administrative Assistant Brenda M. Caraan Technical Assistant Nieves C. Hibaya Messenger Alexander S. Recalde Sustainable Ecosystems International Corp. No. 19-A Matimtiman St., Teachers Village West, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines Tel: + (632) 434-2596 Fax:
  • Human Rights Violations on the Basis of Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Homosexuality in the Philippines

    Human Rights Violations on the Basis of Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Homosexuality in the Philippines

    Human Rights Violations on the Basis of Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Homosexuality in the Philippines Submitted for consideration at the 106 th Session of the Human Rights Committee for the fourth periodic review of the Philippines October 2012 COALITION REPORT Submitted by: International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC) www.IGLHRC.org LGBT AND HUMAN RIGHTS GROUPS: INDIVIDUAL LGBT ACTIVISTS: 1. Babaylanes, Inc. 1. Aleksi Gumela 2. Amnesty International Philippines - LGBT Group (AIPh-LGBT) 2. Alvin Cloyd Dakis 3. Bacolod and Negros Gender Identity Society (BANGIS) 3. Arnel Rostom Deiparine 4. Bisdak Pride – Cebu 4. Bemz Benedito 5. Cagayan De Oro Plus (CDO Plus) 5. Carlos Celdran 6. Changing Lane Women’s Group 6. Ian Carandang 7. Coalition for the Liberation of the Reassigned Sex (COLORS) 7. Mae Emmanuel 8. Elite Men’s Circle (EMC) 8. Marion Cabrera 9. EnGendeRights, Inc. 9. Mina Tenorio 10. Filipino Freethinkers (FF) 10. Neil Garcia 11. Fourlez Women’s Group 11. Raymond Alikpala 12. GAYAC (Gay Achievers Club) 12. Ryan Sylverio 13. KABARO-PUP 13. Santy Layno 14. LADLAD Cagayan De Oro 15. LADLAD Caraga, Inc. 16. LADLAD Europa 17. LADLAD LGBT Party 18. LADLAD Region II 19. Lesbian Activism Project Inc. (LeAP!), Inc. 20. Lesbian Piipinas 21. Link Davao 22. Metropolitan Community Church – Metro Baguio City (MCCMB) 23. Miss Maanyag Gay Organization of Butuan 24. OUT Exclusives Women’s Group 25. OUT Philippines LGBT Group 26. Outrage LGBT Magazine 27. Philippine Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches (MCC) 28. Philippine Forum on Sports, Culture, Sexuality and Human Rights (TEAM PILIPINAS) 29. Pink Watch (formerly Philippine LGBT Hate Crime Watch (PLHCW) ) 30.
  • Diaspora Philanthropy: the Philippine Experience

    Diaspora Philanthropy: the Philippine Experience

    Diaspora Philanthropy: The Philippine Experience ______________________________________________________________________ Victoria P. Garchitorena President The Ayala Foundation, Inc. May 2007 _________________________________________ Prepared for The Philanthropic Initiative, Inc. and The Global Equity Initiative, Harvard University Supported by The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation ____________________________________________ Diaspora Philanthropy: The Philippine Experience I . The Philippine Diaspora Major Waves of Migration The Philippines is a country with a long and vibrant history of emigration. In 2006 the country celebrated the centennial of the first surge of Filipinos to the United States in the very early 20th Century. Since then, there have been three somewhat distinct waves of migration. The first wave began when sugar workers from the Ilocos Region in Northern Philippines went to work for the Hawaii Sugar Planters Association in 1906 and continued through 1929. Even today, an overwhelming majority of the Filipinos in Hawaii are from the Ilocos Region. After a union strike in 1924, many Filipinos were banned in Hawaii and migrant labor shifted to the U.S. mainland (Vera Cruz 1994). Thousands of Filipino farm workers sailed to California and other states. Between 1906 and 1930 there were 120,000 Filipinos working in the United States. The Filipinos were at a great advantage because, as residents of an American colony, they were regarded as U.S. nationals. However, with the passage of the Tydings-McDuffie Act of 1934, which officially proclaimed Philippine independence from U.S. rule, all Filipinos in the United States were reclassified as aliens. The Great Depression of 1929 slowed Filipino migration to the United States, and Filipinos sought jobs in other parts of the world.
  • Acto Firma Vª Comisión Mixta Hispano-Filipina

    Acto Firma Vª Comisión Mixta Hispano-Filipina

    FIFTH JOINT COMMISSION SPAIN-PHILIPPINES ANNEXES ANNEX I - Spanish and Philippine Delegations ANNEX II - Evaluation of the Fourth Joint Commission ANNEX III - Projects and Programmes of the Fourth Joint Commission (2001-2005) ANNEX IV - Main actors of the Spain-Philippine Cooperation ANNEX V - Spanish NGOs in The Philippines during the Fourth Joint Commission ANNEX VI - General management and procedures for the implementation of the Fifth Joint Commission. ANNEX I Spanish and Philippine Delegations for the Fifth Joint Commission, Madrid, November 30 th Spanish Delegation Philippine Delegation Mr. Juan Pablo de Laiglesia Sr. Rolando Tungpalan General Secretary, AECI Executive Deputy Director, NEDA Excellency, Mr. Ignacio Sagaz Temprano Excellency Mr. Joseph D. Bernardo Ambassador of The Republic of The Ambassador of Spain in Manila Philippines in Madrid Mr. Ricardo Martínez Vázquez Mrs. Evangelina Lourdes M. Arroyo General Director of Cooperation with Africa, Director, Strategic Development, FIT-ED Asia and Eastern Europe, AECI Mr. José Eugenio Salarich Mr. Joselito A. Jimeno General Director of Foreign Policy for Director of the European Affairs Office, Asia and the Pacific, MAEC DFA Mrs. Cristina Díaz Fernández-Gil Mr. Marciano De Borja Deputy Director General, Cooperation with First Secretary of Embassy of The Subsaharan Africa and Asia, AECI Republic of The Philippines Mrs. Mercedes de Castro Ruiz Mrs. Pamela Quizón Directorate General of Cultural First Planning Counsellor, NEDA and Scientific Relations Mr. José Mª Taberné Abad General Coordinator of the Technical Cooperation Office, Manila Mrs. Carmen De Juana Velasco Technical Adviser, for Asia, AECI ANNEX I Philippines and Spanish Delegations for the Fifth Joint Commission, Madrid, November 30 th Philippine Delegation Spanish Delegation Mr.
  • Southern Philippines Irrigation Sector Project

    Southern Philippines Irrigation Sector Project

    Resettlement Planning Document Resettlement Plan for the Cantilan River Irrigation Project Final Project Number: 27245 May 2007 PHI: Southern Philippines Irrigation Sector Project Prepared by: National Irrigation Administration; PRIMEX The resettlement plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Republic of the Philippines NATIONAL IRRIGATION ADMINISTRATION (Pambansang Pangasiwaan ng Patubig) Southern Philippines Irrigation Sector Project (SPISP) (ADB Loan No. 1668-PHI) LLAANNDD AACCQQUUIISSIITTIOONN AND RESETTLEMENT PLAN CANTILAN RIVER IRRIGATION PROJECT May 2007 ADB Loan 1668-PHI: Southern Philippines Irrigation Sector Project SOUTHERN PHILIPPINES IRRIGATION SECTOR PROJECT LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT PLAN (LARP) CANTILAN IRRIGATION SYSTEM SUBPROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures iii List of Tables iv List of Annexes v List of Acronyms vii Executive Summary vii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background of the Subproject 1 1.2 Objectives of the LARP 3 1.3 General Description of the Proposed Subproject Rehabilitation 4 1.4 Irrigation Service Area 6 2.0 Baseline Information and Assessment of Probable Involuntary Resettlement Impacts 2.1 Baseline Information 8 2.2 Socio-Economic Survey 2.3 Assessment of the Probable Involuntary Resettlement Impacts 9 3.0 Documentation, Segregation and Valuation of the Old Right-Of-Way Areas, and Livelihood Assistance Strategies 3.1 Documentation of Old ROW Areas 13 3.2
  • DSWD DROMIC Report #5 on Tropical Depression “VICKY” As of 22 December 2020, 6PM

    DSWD DROMIC Report #5 on Tropical Depression “VICKY” As of 22 December 2020, 6PM

    DSWD DROMIC Report #5 on Tropical Depression “VICKY” as of 22 December 2020, 6PM Situation Overview On 18 December 2020, Tropical Depression “VICKY” entered the Philippine Area of Responsibility (PAR) and made its first landfall in the municipality of Banganga, Davao Oriental at around 2PM. On 19 December 2020, Tropical Depression “VICKY” made another landfall in Puerto Princesa City, Palawan and remained a tropical depression while exiting the Philippine Area of Responsibility (PAR) on 20 December 2020. Source: DOST-PAGASA Severe Weather Bulletin I. Status of Affected Families / Persons A total of 31,408 families or 130,855 persons were affected in 290 barangays in Regions VII, VIII, XI and Caraga (see Table 1). Table 1. Number of Affected Families / Persons NUMBER OF AFFECTED REGION / PROVINCE / MUNICIPALITY Barangays Families Persons GRAND TOTAL 290 31,408 130,855 REGION VII 32 618 2,510 Bohol 3 15 60 Candijay 3 15 60 Cebu 15 441 1,812 Argao 1 15 45 Boljoon 2 13 44 Compostela 2 54 221 Dalaguete 1 2 8 Danao City 1 150 600 Dumanjug 1 20 140 Lapu-Lapu City (Opon) 4 163 662 Sibonga 3 24 92 Negros Oriental 14 162 638 Bais City 3 33 125 Dumaguete City (capital) 6 92 365 City of Tanjay 5 37 148 REGION VIII 2 12 38 Leyte 2 12 38 MacArthur 1 10 34 Mahaplag 1 2 4 REGION XI 22 608 2,818 Davao de Oro 13 294 1,268 Compostela 2 10 37 Mawab 1 7 20 Monkayo 3 72 360 Montevista 1 13 65 Nabunturan (capital) 4 152 546 Pantukan 2 40 240 Davao del Norte 8 310 1,530 Asuncion (Saug) 6 238 1,180 Kapalong 1 12 50 New Corella 1 60 300 Davao Oriental 1 4 20 Cateel 1 4 20 CARAGA 234 30,170 125,489 Page 1 of 9 | DSWD DROMIC Report #5 on Tropical Depression “VICKY” as of 22 December 2020, 6PM NUMBER OF AFFECTED REGION / PROVINCE / MUNICIPALITY Barangays Families Persons Agusan del Norte 30 1,443 6,525 Butuan City (capital) 16 852 4,066 City of Cabadbaran 9 462 2,007 Jabonga 2 38 119 Las Nieves 1 10 50 Remedios T.
  • Agusan Del Norte

    Agusan Del Norte

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Parel, Danileen Kristel C.; Detros, Keith C.; Salinas, Christine Ma. Grace R. Working Paper Bottom-up Budgeting Process Assessment: Agusan del Norte PIDS Discussion Paper Series, No. 2015-26 Provided in Cooperation with: Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Philippines Suggested Citation: Parel, Danileen Kristel C.; Detros, Keith C.; Salinas, Christine Ma. Grace R. (2015) : Bottom-up Budgeting Process Assessment: Agusan del Norte, PIDS Discussion Paper Series, No. 2015-26, Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Makati City This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/127035 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Philippine Institute for Development Studies Surian sa mga Pag-aaral Pangkaunlaran ng Pilipinas Bottom-up Budgeting Process Assessment: Agusan del Norte Danileen Kristel C.