DOCSLIB.ORG

Pillage and Rape in War a Dissertation Submitted To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pillage and Rape in War a Dissertation Submitted To DEVELOPMENT OF GLOBAL PROHIBITION REGIMES: PILLAGE AND RAPE IN WAR A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY TUBA INAL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ADVISER: KATHRYN SIKKINK JULY 2008 © Tuba Inal 2008 Acknowledgements I would like to take this opportunity to thank the most important people in my life; without their support, encouragement and guidance, this dissertation would not have been possible. I am extremely lucky to have Professor Kathryn Sikkink as my adviser not only because her knowledge and vision shed light on my research or because she spent so much of her time to read and comment on my drafts but also because she personally supported me through the hardest struggles of my life. For that I am grateful. I would also like to thank Professor Mary Dietz for her invaluable mentorship. Every time my brain got numb in the dullness of the dissertation writing process, she lighted up light bulbs in my mind. I am thankful to Professor Sally Kenney for believing in me through the ups and downs of the last eleven years. Without her encouragement and guidance I would not go into graduate school, I would not be interested in women’s movements and I would not know how to write about them hence this dissertation would not be written. I would like to thank Professor Colin Kahl for his valuable comments and fruitful discussions. Many thanks to Professor Fionnuala Ní Aoláin for her invaluable comments on the legal aspects of my work. I also would like to thank the members of the dissertation writing group at the University of Minnesota who read and commented on every chapter of this dissertation. So much has happened during the four years that I spent writing this dissertation and many thanks to my husband, Hakan Inal for bearing with me through them. I also thank my baby, Alim Ediz Inal for being the joy of my life. I dedicate this dissertation to my parents, Sule and Latif Cilingiroglu and my sister Rana Oral who have always had my back. The writing of this dissertation was supported by a Peace Scholar award from the United States Institute of Peace. The views expressed in this dissertation are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Institute of Peace. The fieldwork in Geneva and Bern for this dissertation was supported by a Doctoral Research Fellowship from MacArthur Interdisciplinary Program on Global Change, Sustainability and Justice. i To my family. ii Abstract Although rape and pillage in war had been so closely related and so similarly justified, there is a 100-year gap between the prohibition of pillage (with The Hague Conventions of 1899, 1907) and the prohibition of rape (with the Rome Statute of 1998) by modern international law. The question is given that women had historically been considered the property of men, why did the prohibition regime that regulated pillage of property not include “pillage” of women? By addressing this chronological discrepancy in the development of these two prohibition regimes, this project seeks to explain two related theoretical questions: The first one is how does change happen in international relations; in particular why do states make laws binding themselves to change the ways war is conducted? The second question is what is the role of “gender” as a category in this process of change? I argue that three conditions are necessary for the emergence of a global prohibition regime: states must believe that they can comply with the prohibition because non-compliance is costly. Secondly, a normative context conducive to the idea that the particular practice is abnormal/undesirable as well as a normative shock to show this undesirability hence give the final push for the normative change are necessary. Thirdly, state and/or non-state actors actively propagating these ideas to promote the creation of a particular regime should exist. The temporal difference between the emergence of the regimes against pillage and rape reveals the role of gender in this process. By looking at the writing of The Hague Conventions (1899, 1907), the Geneva Conventions (1949), the Additional Protocols (1977) and the Rome Statute (1998), I illustrate that until the 1990s, states did not believe that they could prevent rape in war as opposed to pillage because of the gender ideology that framed rape as an inevitable byproduct of male sexuality. Plus, the exclusion of women from politics like the international law-making process meant that actors to promote change could not be effective. Hence, a normative context and a normative shock to make the prohibition of rape in war possible could not develop. iii Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Chapter 2: The Prohibition of Pillage in War 37 Chapter 3: The (Non-) Prohibition of Rape in War: 74 The Hague Conventions (1899, 1907) Chapter 4: The Prohibition of Rape in War: 113 First Steps- The Geneva Conventions (1949) and the Additional Protocols (1977) Chapter 5: The Prohibition of Rape in War: 161 The Success- The Rome Statute (1998) Chapter 6: Conclusions 204 Appendices 224 Bibliography 242 iv List of Tables Table 1. Emergence of Prohibition Regimes for Pillage and Rape in War 8 Table 2. The Participation of Women in the Diplomatic Conferences 19 v List of Figures Figure 1. Civilians Convention, Text Adopted by the Working Party- 125 Corrigendum, 8 July 1949. vi Chapter I Introduction One of the important questions in international relations theory is “why and how change happens (if it happens at all)?” Especially the central form of international relations, the core of security realm, i.e. the conduct of war is critical in this respect. According to the mainstream theories of international relations, particularly realism, in an anarchical world where the main actors in international relations, states, are primarily concerned about survival, war, as the ultimate untouchable resort of states, is one area where we should be deeply pessimistic about change. Then why do states make laws binding themselves to change the ways war is conducted? How is it that a practice, a weapon considered perfectly normal in war comes to be perceived abnormal and becomes the subject of a prohibition regime? In order to answer this question I explore when and why states prohibited two closely associated practices in war, namely pillage and rape. The question about these two prohibitions is, given that women had historically been considered the property of men,1 why did the prohibition regime that regulated pillage of property not include “pillage” of women, i.e. why did the prohibition regime against rape develop almost a hundred years later than pillage? Although rape and loot continued to go hand in hand as bonuses for the soldiers for centuries,2 why were both eventually prohibited and why was one prohibited before the other? Feminist international relations scholars have long argued that gender ideologies and the marginalization of women within political institutions are at the root of the perpetuation of certain structures in international relations whether it is the lack of change or the direction of change. The historical discrepancy between the regime changes on rape and pillage, therefore, brings out a second question: How can this historical 1 Askin (1997), pp.20-21. She gives the example of John of Salisbury, for instance, who attempted to regulate the conduct of justifiable wars in 1159 and considered “acts of theft and rapine (which is defined as ‘plunder, forcibly seizing another’s property’ by American Heritage Dictionary)- property crimes” together; p.24. Also see Hirschon (1984), Hecker (1971), Porter (1986), Brownmiller (1975), Engels (1972). 2 Askin (1997), p.27; Enloe (1994), p.220. 1 discrepancy help us understand the impact of gender on “change” in international relations? By explaining the specific questions about the development of the prohibition regimes against pillage and rape in war, I will address these two related theoretical questions: how does change happen in international relations and what is the role of “gender” as a category in this process of change? I argue that for a prohibition regime to emerge there has to be certain material factors, ideational factors and agents at work. While the material factors alone cannot explain the regime changes, they need to be taken into consideration since states do make calculations (over the cost-benefit structure) when they create and sign on to international laws. In this respect the costs and benefits of continuing or discontinuing certain practices in war should be examined to get a better picture. I look at two types of ideational factors. The first is the ideas about the practice (including the normative context with core norms and the normative shocks) and the second is the belief, on the part of states, in the preventability of that particular practice. The agents (the norm entrepreneurs both within and outside the state apparatus) who were active in the promotion and creation of these prohibition regimes constitute the third focal point. I will suggest gender, both as a socially constructed ideology and as a barrier to exclude women from institutions like international law-making process as the key to solve the puzzle of why the prohibition regime against rape emerged almost 100 years later than the regime against pillage. This chapter lays out the research question and design in three sections. The first section is about theoretical foundations of the research questions and the key concepts that I use to ask and answer them. The second section is a chapter overview in which I look at the two cases, pillage and rape in war, briefly from a historical as well as a theoretical perspective exploring the changes in the practice and later prohibition of pillage and rape.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Art in Wartime
    Activity: Saving Art during Wartime: A Monument Man’s Mission | Handouts Art in Wartime: Understanding the Issues At the age of 37, Walter Huchthausen left his job as a professor at the University of Minnesota and a designer and architect of public buildings to join the war efort. Several other artists, architects, and museum person- nel did the same. In December 1942, the director of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, Francis Taylor, heard about the possibility of serving on a team of specialists to protect monuments in war zones. He wrote : “I do not know yet how the Federal Government will decide to organize this, but one thing is crystal clear; that we will be called upon for professional service, either in civilian or military capacity. I personally have ofered my services, and am ready for either.” Do you think it was a good use of U.S. resources to protect art? What kinds of arguments could be advanced for and against the creation of the MFAA? Arguments for the creation of the MFAA: Arguments against the creation of the MFAA: Walter Huchthausen lost his life trying to salvage an altarpiece in the Ruhr Valley, Germany. What do you think about the value of protecting art and architecture in comparison to the value of protecting a human life? Arguments for use of human lives to protect art during war: ABMCEDUCATION.ORG American Battle Monuments Commission | National History Day | Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media Activity: Saving Art during Wartime: A Monument Man’s Mission | Handouts Arguments against the use of human lives to protect art during war: Germany had purchased some of the panels of the famous Ghent altarpiece (above) before World War I, then removed other panels during its occupation of Belgium in World War I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rape System: Old Roles and New Times
    Catholic University Law Review Volume 27 Issue 4 Summer 1978 Article 3 1978 The Rape System: Old Roles and New Times Sally Gold Martha Wyatt Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation Sally Gold & Martha Wyatt, The Rape System: Old Roles and New Times, 27 Cath. U. L. Rev. 695 (1978). Available at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview/vol27/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Catholic University Law Review by an authorized editor of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE RAPE SYSTEM: OLD ROLES AND NEW TIMES Sally Gold and Martha Wyatt* I. INTRODUCTION A rape victim who chooses to report the attack upon her to the authori- ties endures particular embarrassment and shame. The progress of her case through our criminal justice system has been compared to a second rape; the victim is made to feel that she, rather than the attacker, is on trial. If her assailant is adjudged not guilty, she must also endure damage to her reputation. What is most unfortunate, however, is that the shameful treat- ment she receives is a direct result of our society's rape laws, which are not designed to protect her, but rather the male possessory interest in her. Two elements are involved in the crime of rape: the penetration with force by the attacker and the lack of consent of the attacked. Each element is separate and distinct; one does not necessarily constitute evidence of the other.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Sexual Assault in the U.S., Canada, and England Catie Carson
    Undergraduate Review Volume 3 Article 11 2007 A Comparison of Sexual Assault in the U.S., Canada, and England Catie Carson Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/undergrad_rev Part of the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Carson, Catie (2007). A Comparison of Sexual Assault in the U.S., Canada, and England. Undergraduate Review, 3, 57-69. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/undergrad_rev/vol3/iss1/11 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. Copyright © 2007 Catie Carson A Comparison of Sexual Assault in the U.S., Canada, and England Catie Carson Catie Carson is a senior majoring in criminal Abstract justice and psychology. She plans to attend s the sexual offense rate in the United States higher than that of other graduate school for criminal justice and developed nations? If so, why and if not, why not? This exploratory wanted the experience of conducting research was conducted by funding through the Bridgewater State College formal research. This project was initiated Adrian Tinsley Grant Program during the summer of 2006. It will provide by her advisor, Dr. Richard Wright, who information that may help criminal justice professionals and psychologists acted as her mentor during the research Iunderstand more about factors in sexual assault, which may be unique to the process. Ms. Carson hopes to have a career United States. This comparative research examines the role of culture, politics, gender, historical foundations, legal structures, and sexual assault in three in investigations. highly industrialized Western democracies.
    [Show full text]
  • Incredible Women: Sexual Violence and the Credibility Discount
    UNIVERSITY of PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW Founded 1852 Formerly AMERICAN LAW REGISTER © 2017 University of Pennsylvania Law Review VOL. 166 DECEMBER 2017 NO. 1 ARTICLE INCREDIBLE WOMEN: SEXUAL VIOLENCE AND THE CREDIBILITY DISCOUNT DEBORAH TUERKHEIMER† Credibility is central to the legal treatment of sexual violence, as epitomized by the iconic “he said/she said” contest. Over time, the resolution of competing factual accounts has evidenced a deeply skeptical orientation toward rape accusers. This incredulous stance remains firmly lodged, having migrated from formal legal rules to informal practices, with much the same result—an enduring system of disbelief. Introducing the concept of “credibility discounting” helps to explain the dominant feature of our legal response to rape. Although false reports of rape are uncommon, † Class of 1940 Research Professor of Law, Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law. J.D., Yale Law School; A.B., Harvard College. My thanks to Ronald Allen, Miranda Fricker, Terry Fromson, Andrew Gold, Emily Kadens, Sherry Kolb, Andrew Koppelman, Jennifer Lackey, Sarah Lawksy, Gregory Mark, Janice Nadler, and John McGinnis for their helpful suggestions and insights. Sarah Crocker and Tom Gaylord, Faculty Services and Scholarly Communications Librarian, contributed outstanding research assistance, and the Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law Faculty Research Program furnished generous financial support. (1) 2 University of Pennsylvania Law Review [Vol. 166: 1 law enforcement officers tend to default to doubt when women allege sexual assault, resulting in curtailed investigations as well as infrequent arrests and prosecutions. Credibility discounts, which are meted out at every stage of the criminal process, involve downgrades both to trustworthiness (corresponding to testimonial injustice) and to plausibility (corresponding to hermeneutical injustice).
    [Show full text]
  • Legitimate Concern: the Assault on the Concept of Rape
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Via Sapientiae: The Institutional Repository at DePaul University DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 9-2013 Legitimate concern: the assault on the concept of rape Matthew David Burgess DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Burgess, Matthew David, "Legitimate concern: the assault on the concept of rape" (2013). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 153. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/153 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Legitimate Concern: The Assault on the Concept of Rape A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts By Matthew David Burgess June 2013 Women’s and Gender Studies College of Liberal Arts and Sciences DePaul University Chicago, Illinois 1 Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….3 A Brief Legal History of Rape………………………………………………………………….....6 -Rape Law in the United States Prior to 1800…………………………………………….7 -The WCTU and
    [Show full text]
  • The German Army, Vimy Ridge and the Elastic Defence in Depth in 1917
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 18, ISSUE 2 Studies “Lessons learned” in WWI: The German Army, Vimy Ridge and the Elastic Defence in Depth in 1917 Christian Stachelbeck The Battle of Arras in the spring of 1917 marked the beginning of the major allied offensives on the western front. The attack by the British 1st Army (Horne) and 3rd Army (Allenby) was intended to divert attention from the French main offensive under General Robert Nivelle at the Chemin des Dames (Nivelle Offensive). 1 The French commander-in-chief wanted to force the decisive breakthrough in the west. Between 9 and 12 April, the British had succeeded in penetrating the front across a width of 18 kilometres and advancing around six kilometres, while the Canadian corps (Byng), deployed for the first time in closed formation, seized the ridge near Vimy, which had been fiercely contested since late 1914.2 The success was paid for with the bloody loss of 1 On the German side, the battles at Arras between 2 April and 20 May 1917 were officially referred to as Schlacht bei Arras (Battle of Arras). In Canada, the term Battle of Vimy Ridge is commonly used for the initial phase of the battle. The seizure of Vimy ridge was a central objective of the offensive and was intended to secure the protection of the northern flank of the 3rd Army. 2 For detailed information on this, see: Jack Sheldon, The German Army on Vimy Ridge 1914-1917 (Barnsley: Pen&Sword Military, 2008), p. 8. Sheldon's book, however, is basically a largely indiscriminate succession of extensive quotes from regimental histories, diaries and force files from the Bavarian War Archive (Kriegsarchiv) in Munich.
    [Show full text]
  • National Narratives of the First World War
    NATIONAL NARRATIVES OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR AUTHOR(S) Aleksandra Pawliczek COLLABORATOR(S) THEMES World War I PERIOD 1914-2014 Veteran’s of Australia http://www.anzacportal.dva.gov.au/ CENDARI is funded by the European Commission’s 7th Framework Programme for Research 3 CONTENTS 6 NATIONAL NARRATIVES OF 35 THE RAPE OF BELGIUM THE FIRST WORLD WAR – MEMORY AND COMMEMORATION 38 HUNGARY’S LOST TERRITORIES Abstract Introduction 39 BIBLIOGRAPHY 8 THE “GREAT WAR” IN THE UK 12 “LA GRANDE GUERRE” IN FRANCE 16 GERMANY AND WAR GUILT 19 AUSTRIA AND THE END OF THE EMPIRE 21 ANZAC DAY IN NEW ZEALAND AND AUSTRALIA 25 POLAND AND THE WARS AFTER THE WAR 27 REVOLUTIONS AND CIVIL WAR IN RUSSIA 29 SERBIA’S “RED HARVEST” 31 THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE 33 UKRAINE’S FIRST ATTEMPT OF INDEPENDENCE 34 OCCUPATION OF BELARUS 4 5 National Narratives of the First World War – Memory and Commemoration CENDARI Archival Research Guide NATIONAL NARRATIVES OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR – MEMORY Here is not the place to reflect on the ambivalences of public and private memories in AND COMMEMORATION depth (but see also the ARG on Private Memories). It is rather the place to address the strongest current trends and their alteration over time, pointing at the still prevalent nar- ratives in their national contexts, which show huge differences across (European) borders Abstract and manifest themselves in the policy of cultural agents and stakeholders. According to the official memories of the First World War, cultural heritage institutions have varying How is the First World War remembered in different regions and countries? Is there a roles around the Centenary, exposing many different sources and resources on the war “European memory”, a “mémoire partagée”, or do nations and other collective groups and thus also the perceptions of the war in individual countries.
    [Show full text]
  • BCMH First World War Occasional Paper
    British Commission for Military History First World War Occasional Paper No. 1 (2015) The Battle of Malmaison - 23-26 October 1917 ‘A Masterpiece of Tactics’ Tim Gale BCMH First World War Occasional Paper The British Commission for Military History’s First World War Occasional Papers are a series of research articles designed to support people’s research into key areas of First World War history. Citation: Tim Gale, ‘The Battle of Malmaison - 23-26 October 1917: ‘A Masterpiece of Tactics’’, BCMH First World War Occasional Paper, No. 1 (2015) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. The Battle of Malmaison Page 2 BCMH First World War Occasional Paper Abstract: This occasional paper explores the background, planning, conduct and aftermath of the Battle of Malmaison in October 1917. The Battle of Malmaison was not a large battle by the standards of the First World War; however, it was of crucial importance in the development of French military thought during the war and it was a significant moment in the process of restoring morale within the French army. About the Author: Dr Tim Gale was awarded his PhD by the Department of War Studies, King's College London for his work on French tank development and operations in the First World War. He has contributed chapters on this subject in several academic books, as well as other work on the French Army during the First World War. Tim has made a special study of the career of the controversial French First World War General, Charles Mangin.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Anti-Rape Activism EMERALD STUDIES in CRIMINOLOGY, FEMINISM and SOCIAL CHANGE
    Online Anti-Rape Activism EMERALD STUDIES IN CRIMINOLOGY, FEMINISM AND SOCIAL CHANGE Series Editors: Sandra Walklate, School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Australia. Kate Fitz-Gibbon, School of Social Sciences at Monash University and Monash Gender and Family Violence Prevention Centre, Australia. Jude McCulloch, Monash University and Monash Gender and Family Violence Prevention Centre, Australia. JaneMaree Maher, Centre for Women’s Studies and Gender Research Sociology, Monash University, Australia. Emerald Studies in Criminology, Feminism and Social Change offers a platform for innovative, engaged, and forward-looking feminist-informed work to explore the interconnections between social change and the capacity of criminology to grapple with the implications of such change. Social change, whether as a result of the movement of peoples, the impact of new technologies, the potential consequences of climate change, or more commonly iden- tified features of changing societies, such as ageing populations, inter-generational conflict, the changing nature of work, increasing awareness of the problem of gen- dered violence(s), and/or changing economic and political context, takes its toll across the globe in infinitely more nuanced and inter-connected ways than previously imag- ined. Each of these connections carry implications for what is understood as crime, the criminal, the victim of crime and the capacity of criminology as a discipline to make sense of these evolving interconnections. Feminist analysis, despite its conten- tious relationship with the discipline of criminology, has much to offer in strengthen- ing the discipline to better understand the complexity of the world in the twenty-first century and to scan the horizon for emerging, possible or likely futures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hidden Truth: an Institutional Look at the Underreporting of Rape
    The Hidden Truth: An Institutional Look at the Underreporting of Rape Nathaniel Louderback Creighton University I. Research Question Every six seconds a woman somewhere in the United States is raped (U.S. Department of Justice, 1999). This issue is one of the many concerning women’s rights in the United States. There are many female activist groups in the country, and they offer many services that are aimed at the bettering women’s lives. Looking at the number of reported rapes for cities showed that there were vast differences between cities, even with cities that were close together in population. The cities of Miami, Phoenix, and Seattle all have approximately three million citizens, but Miami reported 113 rapes, Phoenix reported 422, and Seattle reported 181. This is a large discrepancy over a small population variable. So how do we explain the variation in the number of rape reports per capita for a metropolitan area? A metropolitan area is defined as all areas included in a city area according to the metropolitan area data on the United States Census. The official rape report is the number of rapes a metropolitan area reports to the Uniform Crime Reports for the year of 1999. Per capita is defined by the number of people living in a given metropolitan area and will be determined by the Census. The research for this project will concentrate on metropolitan areas with more than one million residents. This is done to ensure there is not a statistical error for smaller cities where one rape case would be a substantial portion of their population.
    [Show full text]
  • Vladimir Hrabar: the Cosmopolitan International Lawyer
    138 АЛьманах Международного права • Выпуск 3 • Lauri MälkSoo Professor of international law at the university of tartu, Estonia VLADIMIR HRABAR: THE COSMOPOLITAN INTERNATIONAL LAWYER «Many of the achievements of the European civilization have been sacrificed in the war by this or another warring party light-heartedly, in order to achieve short- term gains. A lot of contemporary international law has been swept away in this global fight. But we do not need to worry about the future. In history, periods of peaceful construction follow periods of destruction. So it will be now too.»1 Vladimir Hrabar, in March 1917 1. life In 1952, an old distinguished scholar Vladimir Emmanuilovich Hrabar arrived with his wife Maria Passek (1893-1975), the daughter of the pre-World War I rector of Iur’ev University, on a Moscow train at the train station in Tartu. There, Hrabar was welcomed by the rector of Tartu State University Fyodor Klement and the then lecturer (later professor) of international law, Abner Uustal. Hrabar’s personal notes reveal that he had been very moved by the occasion: he had not seen Tartu since he left the university town in 1918. Many things had changed, especially given the destruction suffered during the Second World War, yet the essence of the old university town had remained unchanged. Later Hrabar remarked in his memoirs: «I am more than 87 years old. 25 of those years I have lived in Tartu. The time spent there was the happiest in my life and the most fruitful one in my scholarly activity. Today, I remember it with gratitude.»2 Hrabar was born on 10(22) January 1865, in Vienna, in an intellectually active Carpatho-Rusyn family3.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Base Defense Rethinking Army and Air Force Roles and Functions for More Information on This Publication, Visit
    C O R P O R A T I O N ALAN J. VICK, SEAN M. ZEIGLER, JULIA BRACKUP, JOHN SPEED MEYERS Air Base Defense Rethinking Army and Air Force Roles and Functions For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR4368 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0500-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The growing cruise and ballistic missile threat to U.S. Air Force bases in Europe has led Headquarters U.S.
    [Show full text]