Politics and Society in Italian Cinema, 1945 – 1975
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Politics and Society in Italian Cinema, 1945 – 1975 David Gariff National Gallery of Art My school was the streets, the Communist cells, the cinema, variety entertainment, the municipal library, the struggles of the unemployed, the detention cells, clashes with the police, the studios of artists of my age, the film clubs. And then I also learned from those who at the time were called “professional revolutionaries.” — Elio Petri In 1976 the art historian Federico Zeri (1921 – 3 1998) published an essay titled “La percezione visiva dell’ Italia e degli Italiani nella storia della pittura” (“The Visual Perception of Italy and the Italians in the History of Painting”).1 In this provocative text, Zeri attempted to analyze the way in which Italians, from the time of Cimabue to the present, came to understand their world through the images of art history. He argued that their perception of the world was more or less a homogeneous one, something contrary to our common notion of Italian regionalism and pro- tean aspects of cultural identity. In a section embedded at the end of his essay, Zeri extolls the seminal importance to Italian cinema of the early neorealist film Ossessione culminating with the kidnapping and assas- (Obsession, 1942) by Luchino Visconti sination of ex – Prime Minister Aldo Moro (1906 – 1976): (1916 – 1978), Italy’s “leading art” — as acknowl- edged by Zeri — was cinema. Comparable to The essential aspects of what has been the literature and great frescos of past epochs called cinematic neorealism find their through which Italians had come to under- ultimate definition in Luchino Visconti’s stand their world and confront their unique Ossessione, more so than in La terra virtues and vices, so now through the sto- trema. In that archetype, the repertory of ries and screen images of Visconti, Roberto characters, shots, topographical choices, Rossellini (1906 – 1977), and Vittorio De Sica and visual cues is rooted in the soil of a (1901 – 1974) was a new reality of word and 4 vast figurative culture. This, however, is image being presented to a public in search 5 an investigation that art criticism has yet to of its modern identity. conduct: the story that has followed, which has beginnings with Visconti and with his This audience, as Zeri might have said, was perception of Italy in a cinematic light, is steeped in the cultural, geographical, and histori- taking place before our eyes, with such cal traditions of storytelling and imagery. It would richness and variety that one is forced grow, along with the new medium, in its sophis- to acknowledge film as today’s leading tication and demands, creating a symbiotic rela- art, just as operatic music was during the tionship between life, art, imagery, and narrative, Romantic age or architecture during the ultimately leading to a golden age of cinematic early Renaissance.2 achievement comparable to the earlier accom- plishments of Renaissance painting. Beginning in Italy’s immediate postwar period and continuing through the economic miracle The Gallery’s celebration Titanus Presents: of the 1950s, the political spasms of the 1960s, A Family Chronicle of Italian Cinema, and the so-called “years of lead” of the 1970s, while inclusive of films by such well-known directors as Visconti, De Sica, Federico Fellini politically charged films including Salvatore (1920 – 1993), and Michelangelo Antonioni Giuliano (1962), Le mani sulla città (Hands (1912 – 2007), highlights the works of a younger over the City, 1963), and Cadaveri eccellenti generation of directors indebted to their more (Illustrious Corpses, 1976). His films are tes- mature colleagues and mentors. These include taments to the director’s social and political Francesco Rosi (1922 – 2015), Elio Petri engagement and to his belief in the power of film (1929 – 1982), and Ermanno Olmi (b. 1931). to seek truth, affect change, and affirm human With these three directors we find a respectful dignity. acknowledgment of Italian cinema’s neorealist traditions but, at the same time, a more probing Despite the presence of one of Italy’s great and at times confrontational engagement with comedic actors, Alberto Sordi, in Rosi’s early 6 leftist politics expressed through a documen- film I Magliari (1959),4 Rosi’s deeper con- 7 tary or semidocumentary style. Other directors cerns — exploitation of immigrant workers, included in this group but not represented in the effects of organized crime — are plainly apparent. current Titanus series are Pier Paolo Pasolini We are struck by similarities with the socially rel- (1922 – 1975), Bernardo Bertolucci (b. 1941), evant postwar films of the American director Elia the Taviani brothers Vittorio (b. 1929) and Paolo Kazan (1909 – 2003), such as On the Waterfront (b. 1931), and Marco Bellocchio (b. 1939). (1954), a debt that Rosi freely acknowledged.5 A connecting link between and among all these distinguished Italian directors is their commit- I Magliari introduces a theme that came to have ment to the political film genre. major importance throughout Rosi’s career — the plight of the southern Italian forced to Few directors in the history of Italian cinema seek employment in the north (either in Italy or were as deeply devoted to the political film as Europe) — part of the larger “Southern Question” Francesco Rosi. Often called the “poet of civic referring to the long history of economic and courage,”3 Rosi produced a series of intense, social inequality between Italy’s north and those regions south of Rome referred to as the (We Still Kill the Old Way, 1967), Indagine Mezzogiorno. A problem existing from the earli- su un cittadino al di sopra di ogni sospetto est days of Italian unification, its treatment in (Investigation of a Citizen above Suspicion, Italian cinema has a rich history from neorealism 1969), and Todo Modo (One Way or Another, to the present day. Speaking to this point about 1976). I Magliari in 1979, Rosi said: Petri’s early inspiration and training are closely I wanted to continue my investigation of tied to his friendship with one of the elder the world of the marginalized, of the mar- statesmen of neorealism, Giuseppe De Santis ginalized culture of the man of the South (1917 – 1997), whose work is also represented who is forced, by a very precise social fac- in the Titanus festival. De Santis was part of the 10 tor, to “invent” a job for himself.6 seminal group of young directors emerging in 11 the immediate aftermath of the Second World Two years after I Magliari, Rosi would create one War. Many of these filmmakers were associated of the masterpieces of Italian cinema, Salvatore with the avant-garde and short-lived periodical Giuliano, a story about the life and death of a Cinema, published in Rome from 1939 to 1940. Sicilian outlaw set against the troubling and Cinema, a government-sponsored journal, played complex social and political forces that have an important role in the early development of shaped Sicily over time. neorealist film. De Santis had collaborated with Visconti on the script for Ossessione in 1942 The formal structures and thematic range of and later directed one of the four sections of the the Italian political film were bolstered by Rosi’s 1945 film Giorni di gloria (Days of Glory) that slightly younger contemporary, Elio Petri. Petri’s documented the German occupation of Rome body of work contains some of the best-known and the Italian resistance. This latter film was and most popular Italian films of the late 1960s made in the same year as Rossellini’s better- and 1970s. They include: A ciascuno il suo known Roma, città aperta (Rome, Open City). Petri’s themes stressing social reform, the plight in Petri’s film the director approaches the theme of the working class, and political corruption owe of existential alienation that will forever be much to De Santis. But Petri’s films also explore associated with Antonioni. Petri’s protagonist, a darker existential angst and neurosis. His style however, functions within the wider world of progressively became more expressionistic labor and its relationship to the individual and to in his desire to expose the rampant abuses of society at large. That is to say, Petri’s vision is as power, mistrust of authority, and hypocrisies much political as it is personal. of contemporary Italian society and politics. Working during one of Italy’s most traumatic Elio Petri’s untimely death from cancer in 1982, periods of protest, violence, and assassinations, at the age of fifty-three, was a profound loss for the so-called “years of lead” (a reference to the Italian cinema. He completed eleven films in his 12 number of bullets strafing Italian cities at the brief career. Though his final body of work was 13 time), Petri also found inspiration in collabora- small, Petri had waged an uncompromising war tions with the Sicilian novelist Leonardo Sciascia on Italian power, privilege, and politics. At times (1921 – 1989) and the gifted actor Gian Maria with subtle precision, at others through direct Volonté (1933 – 1994). assaults, Petri‘s films awakened Italians to their own descent into a modern inferno. Petri’s second film, I giorni contati (The Days Are Numbered, 1962), was inspired by an Amidst the chaos and trauma of this period, actual event in the director’s life. His father, a one director sought to reclaim the soul of metalworker, physically exhausted from a job Italy and Italian life. Emerging from the same he started at the age of twelve, decided to stop neorealist roots as Rosi and Petri, Ermanno working; he never fully explained the reason Olmi made films that are spiritual meditations to his son.7 Indebted to the neorealism of De encapsulated in one of the director’s favorite Santis, I giorni contati nevertheless shares a expressions: “Cinema is not my life.