DOCSLIB.ORG

The Wild Cascades

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Wild Cascades THE WILD CASCADES FALL - 1989 2 Tae W ild Cascades PRESIDENTS MESSAGE RELICENSING THE SKAGIT DAMS DAVE FLUHARTY If Seattle City Light were to be long hours in meetings and research to proposing to construct the three dams develop studies and proposals for (Gorge, Diablo and Ross) on the Skagit enhancing, mitigating, and protecting River today, the environmental furor the environment that continues to be they would set off would make the Exxon impacted by the Skagit dams and Valdez disaster seem a mere skirmish. associated power production and However, when the dam projects on the transmission facilities. Skagit were licensed by the Federal Power Commission more than sixty years One consequence of the licensing ago only a few voices mourned the loss process, albeit unlikely, is that FERC of this area and many praised the could deny Seattle City Light's developers for their foresight. Through application and require that the dams be the years, those served by Seattle City taken out. Beyond that monumental Light have benefitted from low cost, decision, the potential outcome of the reliable power supplied by these FERC proceedings is fuzzy, but there are projects. Floods on the Skagit have indications that comprehensive been considerably reduced for farms and mitigation packages, worked out in other communities downstream. But these relicensings, can be substantial and benefits have come at considerable cost provide many positive benefits - even to the environment of the Skagit for power production as well as the River. Fortunately, the 50-year license environment. There is not much of the projects has expired and Seattle experience from which to draw, City Light, in applying for a new concerning the type of protection, license, must comply with a new set of mitigation, and enhancement that is laws and a new set of political, required of utilities for relicensing. economic and social conditions. Should it be the same as would be required if the proposal were being made The scenic and wilderness quality of the today on a natural environment? Should North Cascades has been recognized by it be to compensate for the original Congress. The demand for recreation on impacts of the project? Or, should it free-flowing rivers has exploded. The be - from the hard line utility manager's perspective - minimal legal protection accorded the mitigation because the damage if any is environment has increased the ability of already done? From the hardliner's preservation groups to protect natural perspective it is imprudent to do ecosystems and processes. Historic, anything that would raise the cost of cultural and archaeological resources providing power even if this means that must be protected. Fish and wildlife low cost power continues to get a free damages of projects must be taken into ride on the environment. account and compensation provided. And this is where the North Cascades Conservation Council (NCCC) comes in. NCCC proposals for compensatory measures Remember our intervention in the late range from purchase of land to mitigate 1970's to block the licensing of the for wildlife habitat and wilderness High Ross Dam. This provided the time recreation lands inundated by the dams needed and the impetus for an to educational programs on the North international agreement between Canada Cascades ecosystem. We have been and the United States which substituted assisted in developing these proposals for the High Ross Dam. Now, after more by The Nature Conservancy and North than a decade of operating these dams on Cascades Institute and other annual licenses, the Federal Energy environmental preservation groups. Do Regulatory Commission (FERC) has ordered you have ideas we could incorporate into Seattle City Light to complete its this process? We need your input on application. NCCC officers and measures to mitigate/protect/enhance the interested members have been spending impact of the reservoirs, production and Fall - lb 69 3 trasmission facilities and townsites on, deciding to pay a bit more for wildlife, fisheries (downstream and in electricity to allow mitigation of reservoir) recreation (all types), environmental costs of production and cultural historical archeological transmission rather than the 60+ years resources (including consultations with of paying with the environment for lower Native Americans), visual quality, cost power. erosion and slope stability, etc. Please pass your ideas on to NCCC. Over the next six months to a year meetings between Seattle City Light, Preliminary results of studies on the intervenors (NCCC, Upper Skagit Tribes, origins of users of the Skagit River U.S. Forest Service, National Park area show that residents of tne Puget Service, National Marine Fisheries Sound lowland (many of whom are served Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, by Seattle City Light) predominate. Department of Ecology, Department of Your President is writing this with a Wildlife, and potentially others) and word processor powered by Seattle City FERC will result in a revised Light-provided electricity (about 30% of application for a license that should the total energy supply comes from the address these issues. NCCC is making a Skagit). The editors will rework these good-faith effort to provide comment and lines into readable English on another advice on studies to be done and on word processor and produce a final copy measures to compensate for damage to the which will be printed in Seattle for environment. However, we are prepared delivery to you where ever you are. to appeal to FERC and the courts if the Thus, it is not the case of a "them" relicensing package proposed falls short versus "us". It is a case of "us" of adequate mitigation of impacts. Diablo dam 4 The V ild Cascades SEVENTH IRVING CLARK AWARD At the Northwest Wilderness and Parks Conference in Seattle, Daniel J. Evans gave the dinner address "Wilderness as it Relates to "World Needs" on September 9, 1989. Following this, appreciation for Dan Evans' contributions to conservation causes was expressed by Dave Fluharty, President of North Cascades Conservation Council, Bob Aergeter, past President Mt. Rainier National Park Associates, Polly Dyer, President Olympic Park Associates, and Jean Durning, Western Representative Wilderness Society. As Govenor of Washington State, Dan Evans (1) actively supported the creation of a North Cascades National Park and Lake Chelan and Ross Lake National Recreation Areas along with the Pasayton Wilderness, (2) succeeded in having the North Cascades Highway designated a State Scenic Highway, and (3) successfully promoted the addition to Olympic National Park of the Ocean Shore Wilderness from the Ozette River north to include Point of the Arches and Shi Shi Beach. As Senator, he lead the Washington Congressional Delegation in the promotion and passage of legislation establishing Wilderness units within North Cascades, Mt. Rainier, and Olympic National Parks as well as Ross Lake and Lake Chelan National Recreation Areas. In appreciation of this dedicated and successful leadership Dan Evans was presented with the seventh Irving M. Clark Award. IN RECOGNITION OF HIS OUTSTANDING VISION. LEADERSHIP AND SUCCESS IN PRESERVING PARK AND WILDERNESS VALUES FOR THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON AND THE NATION FOR THIS AND FUTURE GENERATIONS Previous recipients of the Irving Clark Award were Irving M. Clark (1958), Harry W. Higman (I960), John Osseward (1965), Karl W. Onthank (1967), Leo Gallegher (1972), and Emily Haig (1977). Fall - 1989 5 SEE YOU IN COURT NGCG CHALLENGES MPS PLftHS As you may have read in local newspapers, the North Cascades Conservation Council has filed suit against the National Park Service over the drafting of plans that allow continued degradation of the Lake Chelan National Recreation Area. The policies promulgated in the plans would envision a doubling of year-round population in the Stehekin Valley, would permit use of firewood and other resources to the detriment of the ecosystem, and would result in major changes in the character of the area and community. NCCC members and its officers have worked hard for countless hours in discussing the plans, commenting on them and appealing for stronger measures to protect the Stehekin Valley. These efforts have been ignored in the final plans. Therefore, the Board voted to bring suit. In the pages that follow, you are invited to read excerpts from the suit. This is an action challenging a series Park Complex" establishing of incremental planning decisions for land management policies which the North Cascades National Park Complex impair wilderness resources which have been and are proposed to be and ignore the effects of made without the benefit of any increased development within environmental impact statement ("EIS") Lake Chelan NRA. addressing their individual and cumulative effects. Plaintiff North Since the National Park Service assumed Cascades Conservation Council (N3C) jurisdiction over the North Cascades seeks judicial review of the following National Park Complex in 1968, the major federal actions significantly visual and ecologic values of the lands affecting the environment of the North and waters within the Lake Chelan NRA Cascades National Park Complex: have suffered a steady decline. The once pristine Stehekin Valley and a. a "Firewood Management Plan spectacular head of Lake Chelan have for Lake Chelan National been cluttered with satellite dishes, Recreation Area" allowing aluminum-roofed stucco houses on land unprecedented clearcutting of fills, and dense pockets of urban live trees within the Lake development. The stream banks and Chelan National Recreation wetlands of the majestic Stehekin River Area. have been fouled by placement of "rip rap" and removal of trees. Some of the b. a "General Management Plan for best specimens of the Stehekin Valley's the North Cascades National primeval forest have been, and others Park Complex" allowing are now scheduled to be, cut down for increased development within firewood for the Stehekin Valley's North Cascades National Park, growing year-round population.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Land Areas of the National Forest System, As of September 30, 2019
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the National Forest System As of September 30, 2019 Forest Service WO Lands FS-383 November 2019 Metric Equivalents When you know: Multiply by: To fnd: Inches (in) 2.54 Centimeters Feet (ft) 0.305 Meters Miles (mi) 1.609 Kilometers Acres (ac) 0.405 Hectares Square feet (ft2) 0.0929 Square meters Yards (yd) 0.914 Meters Square miles (mi2) 2.59 Square kilometers Pounds (lb) 0.454 Kilograms United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Areas of the WO, Lands National Forest FS-383 System November 2019 As of September 30, 2019 Published by: USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20250-0003 Website: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar-index.shtml Cover Photo: Mt. Hood, Mt. Hood National Forest, Oregon Courtesy of: Susan Ruzicka USDA Forest Service WO Lands and Realty Management Statistics are current as of: 10/17/2019 The National Forest System (NFS) is comprised of: 154 National Forests 58 Purchase Units 20 National Grasslands 7 Land Utilization Projects 17 Research and Experimental Areas 28 Other Areas NFS lands are found in 43 States as well as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. TOTAL NFS ACRES = 192,994,068 NFS lands are organized into: 9 Forest Service Regions 112 Administrative Forest or Forest-level units 503 Ranger District or District-level units The Forest Service administers 149 Wild and Scenic Rivers in 23 States and 456 National Wilderness Areas in 39 States. The Forest Service also administers several other types of nationally designated
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing in Washington Sportfishing Rules Pamphlet
    NEWS RELEASE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE 600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, Washington 98501-1091 Internet Address: http://wdfw.wa.gov May 23, 2008 Contact: Fish Program Customer Service, (360) 902-2700 WDFW issues clarifications and corrections to the 2008-09 Sportfishing Rules pamphlet OLYMPIA — The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) has issued corrections and clarifications to the recently published 2008-09 Fishing In Washington Sportfishing Rules pamphlet. The corrections and clarifications are also available on the department’s website at http://wdfw.wa.gov/fish/regs/fishregs.htm. WDFW will provide additional updates and corrections as needed. Anglers are advised to update their copies of the 2008-09 Fishing in Washington Sportfishing Rules pamphlet, which became effective May 1, 2008. Call the Fish Program Customer Service at (360) 902-2700 for questions regarding these changes. CORRECTIONS Page 19 – Grays Harbor Wild Coho Release Requirements Error: The release requirements listed for Grays Harbor Wild Coho are incorrect. Correction: The section should read: Anglers are required to release wild COHO in numerous Grays Harbor tributaries. For further information regarding release requirements of COHO in Marine Area 2.2, see page 108 of the 2008-09 Sportfishing Pamphlet. Page 44 – Cascade River (Skagit Co.) from mouth to Rockport-Cascade Rd. Bridge Error: The dates for the ALL SPECIES non-buoyant lure restriction and night closure are incorrect. Correction: The correct dates should read: ALL SPECIES - June 1-July 15 and Sept. 16- Nov. 30: non-buoyant lure restriction and night closure. Page 59 – Sauk River (Skagit/Snohomish Co.) from Whitechuck River upstream including NORTH FORK and SOUTH FORK Error: The description of this section of the river is incorrect.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Fork Snoqualmie River Watershed Access and Travel
    United States Department Revised Environmental of Agriculture Assessment Forest Service January Middle Fork Snoqualmie River Watershed 2005 Access and Travel Management Plan and Forest Plan Amendment #20 Snoqualmie Ranger District, Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest For Information Contact: Team Leader: Doug Schrenk Snoqualmie Ranger District 42404 SE North Bend Way North Bend, WA 98045 (425) 888-1421, extension 233 [email protected] The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Page i Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 - PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION -- BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................... 1 CHANGED CONDITIONS
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Road Paper Guidebook Format.Indd
    it’s time... reopen “the waY throuGh” to more than a VerY few. stehekin stehekin riVer road summer 2007 trapper lake horseshoe drainaGe horse shoe basin summer 2007 Your abilitY to access the upper ValleY stehekin road, GatewaY to the north cascades, has been seVerelY limited bY a recent national park serVice decision. Reopen “The Way Through” To More Than A Very Few hroughout history Stehekin has been a Arriving at the Cottonwood Campground the The Sierra Club and others promoting Tway through the heart of the rugged and Browers still had plenty of hiking ahead of them, but National Park legislation used the “Wilder- sheer North Cascade mountain range. Used by because they were able to drive (a raucously bumpy ness Alps of Stehekin” as a tool to influence Native Americans, explorers, trappers, miners, ride for sure) to the end of the road, they were able to elected officials and gain public support con- homesteaders, and now hikers and beauty cerning the importance of creating a National seekers, the Stehekin Valley is a pathway Park Complex in the heart of the Cascades. of unparalleled beauty. The valley remains In the challenging era we live, the The two predominant themes characterized remote because there are no outside roads opportunity to refresh the body in the movie were preservation and public leading into it, but once visitors reached the use and enjoyment. “Wilderness Alps of valley, usually by boat, they had long been and inspire the soul is as essential Stehekin” promoted a vision and a promise. able to access the upper reaches of this awe in 2018 as it was in 1958.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Public Comment, Appendix B
    Summary of Public Comment on Roadless Area Conservation Appendix B Requests for Inclusion or Exemption of Specific Areas Table B-1. Requested Inclusions Under the Proposed Rulemaking. Region 1 Northern NATIONAL FOREST OR AREA STATE GRASSLAND The state of Idaho Multiple ID (Individual, Boise, ID - #6033.10200) Roadless areas in Idaho Multiple ID (Individual, Olga, WA - #16638.10110) Inventoried and uninventoried roadless areas (including those Multiple ID, MT encompassed in the Northern Rockies Ecosystem Protection Act) (Individual, Bemidji, MN - #7964.64351) Roadless areas in Montana Multiple MT (Individual, Olga, WA - #16638.10110) Pioneer Scenic Byway in southwest Montana Beaverhead MT (Individual, Butte, MT - #50515.64351) West Big Hole area Beaverhead MT (Individual, Minneapolis, MN - #2892.83000) Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness, along the Selway River, and the Beaverhead-Deerlodge, MT Anaconda-Pintler Wilderness, at Johnson lake, the Pioneer Bitterroot Mountains in the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest and the Great Bear Wilderness (Individual, Missoula, MT - #16940.90200) CLEARWATER NATIONAL FOREST: NORTH FORK Bighorn, Clearwater, Idaho ID, MT, COUNTRY- Panhandle, Lolo WY MALLARD-LARKINS--1300 (also on the Idaho Panhandle National Forest)….encompasses most of the high country between the St. Joe and North Fork Clearwater Rivers….a low elevation section of the North Fork Clearwater….Logging sales (Lower Salmon and Dworshak Blowdown) …a potential wild and scenic river section of the North Fork... THE GREAT BURN--1301 (or Hoodoo also on the Lolo National Forest) … harbors the incomparable Kelly Creek and includes its confluence with Cayuse Creek. This area forms a major headwaters for the North Fork of the Clearwater. …Fish Lake… the Jap, Siam, Goose and Shell Creek drainages WEITAS CREEK--1306 (Bighorn-Weitas)…Weitas Creek…North Fork Clearwater.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Washington Game Status and Trend Report
    S T A T E O F W A S H I N G T O N 20082008 GameGame StatusStatus andand TrendTrend ReRepportort AN OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON 2008 GAME STATUS AND TREND REPORT July 1, 2007 – June 30, 2008 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, WA 98501-1091 STATE OF WASHINGTON Chris Gregoire Governor WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Jeff P. Koenings, Ph.D. Director WILDLIFE PROGRAM Dave Brittell Assistant Director GAME DIVISION Dave Ware Game Division Manager This Program Receives Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration, Project W-96-R, Statewide Wildlife Management. This report should be cited as: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. 2008 Game status and trend report. Wildlife Program, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington, USA. TABLE OF CONTENTS Deer .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Statewide Summary .................................................................................................................. 3 Region 1, PMUs 11, 13, GMUs 101-124 ................................................................................. 7 Region 1, PMUs 14, 15, GMUs 127-142 ............................................................................... 12 Region 2, PMUs 21, 22, GMUs 203-243 ............................................................................... 16 Region 2, PMUs 21, 23, 26 GMUs 243-269 .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mt Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 01/01/2020 to 03/31/2020 Mt Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact R6 - Pacific Northwest Region, Regionwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Region) Regional Aquatic Restoration - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants Completed Actual: 12/18/2019 01/2020 James Capurso Project - Watershed management 503-808-2847 EA [email protected] *UPDATED* Description: The USFS is proposing a suite of aquatic restoration activities for Region 6 to address ongoing needs, all of which have completed consultation, including activities such as fish passage restoration, wood placement, and other restoration activities. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=53001 Location: UNIT - R6 - Pacific Northwest Region All Units. STATE - Oregon, Washington. COUNTY - Adams, Asotin, Benton, Chelan, Clallam, Clark, Columbia, Cowlitz, Douglas, Ferry, Franklin, Garfield, Grant, Grays Harbor, Island, Jefferson, King, Kitsap, Kittitas, Klickitat, Lewis, Lincoln, Mason, Okanogan, Pacific, Pend Oreille, Pierce, San Juan, Skagit, Skamania, Snohomish, Spokane, Stevens, Thurston, Wahkiakum, Walla Walla, Whatcom, Whitman, Yakima, Baker, Benton, Clackamas, Clatsop, Columbia, Coos, Crook, Curry, Deschutes, Douglas, Gilliam, Grant, Harney, Hood River, Jackson, Jefferson, Josephine, Klamath, Lake, Lane, Lincoln, Linn, Malheur, Marion, Morrow, Multnomah, Polk, Sherman, Tillamook, Umatilla, Union, Wallowa, Wasco, Washington, Wheeler, Yamhill. LEGAL - Not Applicable. The project will span all national forests in Region 6. R6 - Pacific Northwest Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) North Cascades Ecosystem - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants In Progress: Expected:04/2020 04/2020 John Rohrer Grizzly Bear Restoration DEIS NOA in Federal Register 509-996-4001 Plan/Environmental Impact 01/12/2017 [email protected] Statement Est.
    [Show full text]
  • North Campus Legislation
    F:\GMK\ASCR15\T30.XML 1 TITLE XXX—NATURAL RE- 2 SOURCES RELATED GENERAL 3 PROVISIONS Subtitle A—Land Conveyances and Related Matters Sec. 3001. Land conveyance, Wainwright, Alaska. Sec. 3002. Sealaska land entitlement finalization. Sec. 3003. Southeast Arizona land exchange and conservation. Sec. 3004. Land exchange, Cibola National Wildlife Refuge, Arizona, and Bu- reau of Land Management land in Riverside County, Cali- fornia. Sec. 3005. Special rules for Inyo National Forest, California, land exchange. Sec. 3006. Land exchange, Trinity Public Utilities District, Trinity County, California, the Bureau of Land Management, and the Forest Service. Sec. 3007. Idaho County, Idaho, shooting range land conveyance. Sec. 3008. School District 318, Minnesota, land exchange. Sec. 3009. Northern Nevada land conveyances. Sec. 3010. San Juan County, New Mexico, Federal land conveyance. Sec. 3011. Land conveyance, Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest, Utah. Sec. 3012. Conveyance of certain land to the city of Fruit Heights, Utah. Sec. 3013. Land conveyance, Hanford Site, Washington. Sec. 3014. Ranch A Wyoming consolidation and management improvement. Subtitle B—Public Lands and National Forest System Management Sec. 3021. Bureau of Land Management permit processing. Sec. 3022. Internet-based onshore oil and gas lease sales. Sec. 3023. Grazing permits and leases. Sec. 3024. Cabin user and transfer fees. Subtitle C—National Park System Units Sec. 3030. Addition of Ashland Harbor Breakwater Light to the Apostle Is- lands National Seashore. Sec. 3031. Blackstone River Valley National Historical Park. Sec. 3032. Coltsville National Historical Park. Sec. 3033. First State National Historical Park. Sec. 3034. Gettysburg National Military Park. Sec. 3035. Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad National Historical Park, Maryland.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpine Lakes Additions
    WashingtonSPRINGWild NEWSLETTER 2015 Including: Alpine Lakes Additions: Washington’s Next Generation of Wilderness Conservation Voices: Brad Tilden, CEO of Alaska Air Group Alpine Lakes Pale: Drinking in the Success 1 Washington Wild Dear Friends, Staff Nearing the end of 2014, as the excitement of the 50th anniversary of the Wilderness Act and our own 35th Jim Hook anniversary as the state’s premier Wilderness grassroots Executive Director advocacy organization began to subside, we knew there was one additional item that would mark this year as truly Lana Dalton exceptional. Approved by the Senate and subject to continuing Administrative discussion in the House, we crossed our fingers hoping Assistant for the passage of the Alpine Lakes Wilderness Additions. With less than two weeks to go before year-end, and more importantly the end of the current Lyndsay Gordon congressional session, we were thrilled to learn that President Barak Obama had signed the bill Brewshed® Program making it the law of the land. We now had 22,000 acres of new Wilderness and nearly 40 miles Manager of new Wild and Scenic River designations for the Pratt and the Middle Fork of the Snoqualmie rivers. All this only 90 minutes from downtown Seattle! Tom Uniack Although a small addition in the context of the storied role we have played in the permanent Conservation Director protection of nearly three million acres of Wilderness in the state, there are several reasons that make this action significant. Only six percent of national forest designated as Wilderness Jill Wasberg in Washington falls in lower elevation lands lying below 3,000 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Puget Sound and Strait Rivers - Special Rules
    Puget Sound and Strait Rivers - Special Rules With various fish populations across the state being listed under the Endangered SpeciesAct, (most recently Puget Sound steelhead) WDFW must provide as much protection as possible for all life stages of these populations, in particular for rearing juveniles. Currently, the standard stream rule opens rivers, streams, and beaver ponds to fishing for game fish from the first Saturday in June – October 31, with an 8" minimum size, 2 fish/day limit. Consequently, much of the juvenile rearing habitat for resident trout and Dolly Varden and anadromous salmon, steelhead, cutthroat, and Bull Trout is currently open for fishing. As a result, these juvenile salmonids are at risk of being incidentally caught and may not survive being handled and released, especially if bait is used. In 2010 we adopted a new management strategy that offers additional protection to stocks in streams draining into Puget Sound or the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The basic rule in these waters is that all rivers, streams, and beaver ponds are closed to fishing unless they are listed in the following tables in the Puget Sound and Strait Rivers section of the pamphlet (see pages 37-52). These tables detail ALL of the fishing opportunity in these drainages. Areas open to fisheries are presented by river system unless the waters drain directly to salt water. All other waters in these drainages are closed to fishing. We have provided a map (below) of these watersheds to get you started on locating an area where you would like to fish.There is also an alphabetical list of open areas (see following page and special rules).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Document
    STATEMENT TO THE SENATE ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES SUBCOMMITTEE ON PUBLIC LANDS AND FORESTS ON THE ALPINE LAKES WILDERENSS ADDITIONS AND PRATT AND MIDDLE FORK SNOQUALMIE RIVERS PROTECTION ACT OF 2009 (S. 721, H.R. 1769) BY ALPINE LAKES PROTECTION SOCIETY AMERICAN RIVERS AMERICAN WHITEWATER CAMPAIGN FOR AMERICA'S WILDERNESS FRIENDS OF WILD SKY MIDFORC COALITION NORTH CASCADES CONSERVATION COUNCIL SIERRA CLUB - CASCADE CHAPTER THE MOUNTAINEERS THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION WASHINGTON WILDERNESS COALITION NOVEMBER 12, 2009 Thank you Chairman Wyden, and Members of the Subcommittee for providing the Alpine Lakes Working Group with the opportunity to submit this statement in support of S. 721, the Alpine Lakes Wilderness Additions and Pratt and Middle Fork Snoqualmie Rivers Protection Act of 20091. The lands and waters proposed for protection under the current legislation are critical additions that provide important fish and wildlife habitat and world-class land and water-based recreation opportunities within an hour’s drive from over a million people in the Seattle-Bellevue Metropolitan area. 1The Alpine Lakes Working Group includes the following organizations: Alpine Lakes Protection Society, American Rivers, American Whitewater, Campaign for America's Wilderness, Friends of Wild Sky, MidFORC Coalition, North Cascades Conservation Council, Sierra Club - Cascade Chapter, The Mountaineers, The Wilderness Society, Washington Trails Association, Washington Wilderness Coalition. 1 We would also like to sincerely thank Senator Murray and Representative Reichert for introducing this important legislation and the other members of the Washington delegation who have cosponsored the bills: Senator Cantwell and Representatives Baird, Inslee, McDermott, and Smith. In particular, we applaud Representative Reichert’s initiative to protect wilderness- quality lands and the Pratt River in his district and to Senator Murray for adding protections for portions of the Middle Fork of the Snoqualmie River to the overall proposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Olympics Wilderness and Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
    116TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 116–388 WILD OLYMPICS WILDERNESS AND WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS ACT FEBRUARY 4, 2020.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed Mr. GRIJALVA, from the Committee on Natural Resources, submitted the following R E P O R T together with DISSENTING VIEWS [To accompany H.R. 2642] [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] The Committee on Natural Resources, to whom was referred the bill (H.R. 2642) to designate and expand wilderness areas in Olym- pic National Forest in the State of Washington, and to designate certain rivers in Olympic National Forest and Olympic National Park as wild and scenic rivers, and for other purposes, having con- sidered the same, report favorably thereon with an amendment and recommend that the bill as amended do pass. The amendment is as follows: Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the following: SEC. 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wild Olympics Wilderness and Wild and Scenic Riv- ers Act’’. SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF OLYMPIC NATIONAL FOREST WILDERNESS AREAS. (a) IN GENERAL.—In furtherance of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), the following Federal land in the Olympic National Forest in the State of Wash- ington comprising approximately 126,554 acres, as generally depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Proposed Wild Olympics Wilderness and Wild and Scenic Rivers Act’’ and dated April 8, 2019 (referred to in this section as the ‘‘map’’), is designated as wil- derness and as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System: (1) LOST CREEK WILDERNESS.—Certain Federal land managed by the Forest Service, comprising approximately 7,159 acres, as generally depicted on the map, which shall be known as the ‘‘Lost Creek Wilderness’’.
    [Show full text]