DOCSLIB.ORG

Minutes of the Planning Committee 17Th July 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Minutes of the Planning Committee 17Th July 2020 COLDEN COMMON PARISH COUNCIL MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMITTEE VIRTUAL MEETING HELD ON WEDNESDAY, 15th JULY 2020 AT 10.30AM Due to the current Coronavirus pandemic, the Parish Council met virtually via Zoom Present Cllr Pam Glasspool Cllr Maggie Hill (Chair) Cllr John Boyes Cllr Richard Izard (at item 52/20) Cllr Alex Loughran (at item 48/20 Apologies Cllr Joanna Battle In attendance Debbie Harding (Clerk) Sophie Thorogood (Assistant Clerk) 0 members of the public P44/20 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies were given as listed above P45/20 TO RECEIVE ANY COUNCILLOR DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY OR NON-PECUNIARY INTERESTS, IN RELATION TO ANY ITEMS ON THE AGENDA Cllr Boyes declared a personal interest in the Brambridge Shop application and will not take place in the discussion. P46/20 TO APPROVE AND SIGN THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMITTEE HELD ON 17th JUNE 2020 It was resolved to approve the minutes of the meeting held on the 17th June 2020 were confirmed and accepted as a true record of the meeting, proposed by Cllr Pam Glasspool seconded by Cllr John Boyes and carried. P47/20 TO RECEIVE QUESTIONS FROM MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC This meeting was advertised as a virtual meeting with the details of how the public could participate on the agenda. No questions were asked. P48/20 TO RECEIVE ANY UPDATES REGARDING ACTIONS FROM THE LAST MEETING OR ANY OTHER GENERAL UPDATES FOR INFORMATION ONLY The plants which were planted on footpath 11 without permission have been removed. The ditch needs to be cleared and will be completed by Green Smile. Winchester City Council are updating the 2015 open space strategy to a 2020 open space strategy, presumably to take forward gaps for the 2036 Local Plan. The Clerk has informed them that open space in the Sandyfields development needs to be added but added a caution about including the woodland as public access is not yet available and the ownership is not yet resolved. Winchester City Council currently have no plans at the moment to put a TPO on the Oaks. They feel it is unfair to responsible trees owners because someone else's actions to put TPO on the Oaks. The Woodland TPO will not be extended as this will mean householders would be unable to cultivate their gardens. Page 1 of 4 The speed limit reminders now have a deployment schedule which his being managed by the handyman. P49/20 TO NOTE ANY PLANNING APPLICATIONS WHICH HAVE BEEN DETERMINED BY WINCHESTER CITY COUNCIL The following applications have been determined since the last meeting Applications which have been approved 20/01000/TPO - 5 Blackthorn Green 20/01087/TPO Trellissick Upper Moors Road SO50 6HW (application amended for approval) The following applications were refused by the WCC Planning Committee 20/00855/FUL - Brown Eaves, 170 Main Road No applications have been withdrawn The following applications are still pending 19/02712/TPO 3 Piping Road - T2 - Oak - Remove. T3 - Oak - Remove. 20/00691/HOU – 6 St Vigor Way 20/00829/HOU - 18 Hack Drive 20/00547/HOU – Pastures, Wardle Road 20/00545/LIS - Kennel Farmhouse Hensting Lane 20/01154/TPO Street Record St Vigor Way 20/01150/TPO North Pond, Colden Common, Tree works as per tree survey 20/01145/TPO Street Record St Vigor Way, Lift crown over pavements 20/01147/TPO Vears Lane East and Lime Close, Tree works as per tree survey P50/20 TO NOTE ANY APPLICATIONS THAT WILL BE CONSIDERED BY WINCHESTER CITY COUNCILS PLANNING COMMITTEE No applications are pending committee approval P51/20 TO NOTE ANY PLANNING APPEALS, SUBMITTED OR DETERMINED SINCE THE LAST MEETING AND RESOLVE TO SUBMIT ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OR REFER TO THE FULL PARISH COUNCIL. No appeals have been submitted nor waiting to be determined. P52/20 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION ON THE FOLLOWING PLANNING APPLICATIONS AND ANY OTHERS WHICH MAY BE RECEIVED AFTER THE AGENDA IS PUBLISHED 20/00960/HOU - 22 Oak Tree Close Colden Common Amended plans are being considered for a reduction in the size of the extension. They are not yet viable on the planning portal. 20/01302/TPO - Blackberry Cottage 30 Vears Lane The Parish Council ask that the Tree officer confirms that the proposed works to the Birch Tree are suitable and that bat habitat is considered prior to any work taking place, due to the proximity to the pond. Proposed by Cllr Pam Glasspool, seconded by Cllr Alex Loughran and carried. Page 2 of 4 20/01206/HOU – 17 Pennington Close The Clerk to write to the neighbours to ask them to get in touch if they have any concerns over the application. Subject to confirmation of no neighbour concerns, it was resolved that the Parish Council has no objection to this application, proposed by Cllr Maggie Hill, seconded by Cllr John Boyes and carried. 20/01202/PNRCOU – 20 Brambridge The Parish Council have no comment on this application, proposed by Cllr Maggie Hill, seconded by Cllr Richard Izard and carried. Cllr Boyes abstained. 20/01200/HOU – 1 Finches Close The Parish Council has no comment on this application, proposed by Cllr Maggie Hill, seconded by Cllr John Boyes and carried. 20/01459/TPO - 25 Hawthorn Close Colden Common Winchester, SO21 1UX The Parish Council has no comment, other than the tree should be checked for bat habitat should the tree officer resolve to approve the application, proposed by Cllr Maggie Hill, seconded by Cllr Glasspool and carried. - P53/20 TO PROVIDE ANY UPDATE AFTER THE PARISH COUNCILS DECISION TO NOT ACCEPT THE TERMS OFFERED BY TAYLOR WIMPEY TO ACCEPT OWNERSHIP OF STRATTON’S COPSE Cllr Porter has not yet met with Taylor Wimpey regarding Stratton Copse, so no update has been received. P54/20 TO UPDATE ON THE PRE-SUBMISSION CONSULTATION ON THE VILLAGE DESIGN STATEMENT Approx. 25 replies have been received regarding pre-submission consultation on the VDS. It was agreed for the Committee to meet informally on the 24th July at 10am at Colden Common Park to discuss the feedback received and agree any amendments. The Clerk to summarise the comments for the committee and make the full documents available. P55/20 TO DISCUSS FOOTPATH 13 AND UPDATE ON ANY CONVERSATIONS WITH HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL IN REGARD TO RIGHTS OF WAY IN THE VILLAGE. The bridleway is not accessible on the Main Road end and needs at new gate. The Clerk to ask the lengthsmen to cut back the foliage at the Main Road at his next visit. No update has been received from rights of way regarding footpath 15. Southern Water have called to say that the mains pipe is NOT leaking. The Clerk to report the water leak at Glen Park which may have an impact on the field. The Clerk to ask whether a local volunteer can test the water where it is so very wet to see if the water is chlorinated. Page 3 of 4 The Clerk to ask Laura Boyns for a date to inspect the resurfaced rights of way in the village for remedial works, before the end of the 1-year guarantee in the contract. P56/20 TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST FROM HCC FOR THE PARISH COUNCIL TO ADOPT OWNERSHIP OF EXISTING BUS SHELTERS IN THE VILLAGE. The Parish Council own the following shelters Church Lane East, Main Road Near Scotts Close, Upper Moors Road near the Community Centre The ownership of New Road West, Spring Lane East, Tees Farm Road and Twyford Moors is unknown. The concrete shelter at Twyford Moors could be a H&S liability and would be expensive to remove and then replace. HCC have indicated that they may consider replacing the concrete shelter at Twyford Moors if the Parish Council will accept ownership of it and the 3 other shelters whose ownership is unproven. The Clerk to continue conversations with HCC based on taking on ownership of all the shelters in return for the replacement of the concrete shelter at Twyford Moors and if possible, another shelter installed elsewhere. Proposed by Cllr HIll, seconded by Cllr Boyes and carried. P57/20 TO CONSIDER ANY MATTERS FOR THE AGENDA FOR THE NEXT MEETING To resolve to close the meeting to members of the public to discuss update on enforcemnt action in the village and alleged breaches of planning policy Village design statement P58/20 RESOLVE TO CLOSE THE MEETING TO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO DISCUSS UPDATE ON ENFORCEMENT ACTION IN THE VILLAGE AND ALLEGED BREACHES OF PLANNING No public were present, no resolution was made. P59/20 CONFIDENTIAL SESSION TO DISCUSS ANY REPORTS OF ALLEGED BREACH OF PLANNING WITHIN THE PARISH TO RECEIVE ANY UPDATES FROM WINCHESTER CITY COUNCIL ON PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND CONTROL ENFORCEMENT WITHIN THE PARISHCONFIDENTIAL SESSION TO DISCUSS ANY REPORTS OF ALLEGEDITHIN THE PARISH TO RECEIVE ANY UPDATES FROM WINCHESTER CITY COUNCIL ON PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND CONTROL ENFORCEMENT WITHIN THE PARISH No matters were discussed. Page 4 of 4 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Saxon Charters and Landscape Evolution in the South-Central Hampshire Basin
    ProcHampsh Field Club ArchaeolSoc 50, 1994, 103-25 SAXON CHARTERS AND LANDSCAPE EVOLUTION IN THE SOUTH-CENTRAL HAMPSHIRE BASIN By CHRISTOPHER K CURRIE ABSTRACT THE CHARTER EVIDENCE Landscape study of the South Central Hampshire Basin north of Methodology Southampton has identified evidence for organised land use, based on diverse agricultural, pastoral and woodland land uses in the The methods used to eludicate the bounds of the Saxon period. Combined study of the topographic, cartographiccharter s discussed below are based on a long­ and charter evidence has revealed that the basis for settlement standing knowledge of the areas under patterns had largely developed by the tenth century. Highly consideration. This was combined with organised common pasturing is identified within gated areas as topographical information given on the earliest being the origin of English commons in the later historic period.Ordnanc e Survey map (one inch, 1810 edition, Evidence for possible river engineering is discussed. sheet XI), particularly with regard to the parish Charter evidence suggests that this developed landscape, boundaries shown thereon. In some cases this was underwent reorganisation in the Late Saxon period, with ecclesiastical bodies at Winchester being the major beneficiaries.supporte d by knowledge of earlier documents. It Although dealing with a small geographical area, this study is accepted that much of the boundaries of these raises implications for the nation-wide study of the origin of estates will be conjectural. Where the boundary land-use traditions and settlement in England. appears to follow close to the earliest known parish boundary, it has been assumed this is the course of die charter bounds, unless there is good INTRODUCTION reason to think otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Residents. Siai 863
    lJUIPSlllRE.] PRIVATE RESIDENTS. SIAI 863 SJ!aw-Yates Ernest, Banby lodge, Sherrard Miss, 14 Elmes road, Moor- Shortt Capt. .Francis R.N. Bicerl.el' Pelham fields, Ryde down, Bournemouth__ lodge, Poulner, Ringwood 5hawcross Rev. John Peter M.A. Sherrell Percy, 36 Ackender rd. Alton Shortt Capt. Henry Dicken R.N. 55 Keoley, Ba:rnes close, Winchester Sherriff Mrs. 16 Heron Court road, 'Vaverley road, Southsea. Shawe-St{)rey Mrs. Grayladys, Bursle- Bournemouth Shotter Fredk. 43 Argyll street,Ryde doa., Southampton Sherriff Robert B. Chilcomb lodge, Shatter Miss, 63 Chapel st.Petersfield Sheaf Albert George, 9 Windermere East hill, Winchester Shatter Rohert W. Woodlands, Hill road, Bournemouth Shervell John, 3 Unicorn terrace, brow, East Liss Sheahan Denis Ahern M.D. 452 Corn- Unicorn raad, Landporl Shoveller John, High grove, Cosham mercial road, Landport Sherwoll Geo. W. 6 Villiers rd.Sthsea Shoveller Misses, 109 Richmond Para. John, Lulworth, Winchester Sherwen William J. P. Ennerdale, road, Bournemouth road, Shirley, Southampton Bell hill, Petersfield Shrubb Lieut. Hy. Arth. B., R.N. In­ Shearer John, Sarum lodge, Ems- SherwinR.W.6sVictoria rd.nth.Sthsea veravon, Mudeford, Christchurch worth road. Shirley, Southampton Sherwood Hen.ry, Ve:rulam, Alexandra Shrubb John P.C., J.P. The Grove, Sbearrnan Ernest C. Byrnelmscote, road, Andover Lymington Park road, Winchester Shettle Harry Wynter, 2 Grosvenor Shrubb Mrs. John Lane, Boldre Shearman Mrs. ~ Dudley terrace, square, Southampton gran(Vl, Lyrnington Dudley road, VentnDr Shewen .Mrs. 38 Belvedere rd.Brnmth Shui!rey Miss,4Tilmore rd.Petersfield Shearman Mrs. St. Catherine, St. Shiel :Miss, Coppice End, Shawford, Shuldham-Legh Col. Harry Shuldham Cross road, Winchester "Winchester M.V.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Twyford Baptisms 1838 to 1920 Revised 7 July 2008
    THE PARISH REGISTER OF TWYFORD HAMPSHIRE 1838 to 1920 TWYFORD BAPTISMS - 1838 - 1920 - Revised 7 July 2008 Transcribed from microfiche and original documents. Additional Notes added January to April 2008 Additional information has been added to the file from the 'Vicars Day Book' maintained by James Hodges Vicar for the period 1825 to 1848. Hampshire Record Office reference 64A 07 (A1 - A2) - Miscellaneous file Fiche numbers 774 to 780. Data examined and input onto a computer data base by B M Sullivan ACMA Telephone 01425 655827 Data only checked by Author Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this document by checking against the original documents held by Hampshire Archives and Local Studies, Hampshire Record Office at Winchester the Author cannot be held responsible for any errors. If you wish to use the information provided you should always check back to the original documents held on microfiche at Hampshire Record Office, Winchester. The Author would be pleased if you could notify him of any errors in this document. Acknowledgement:- HAMPSHIRE ARCHIVES AND LOCAL STUDIES, HAMPSHIRE RECORD OFFICE, Winchester, SO23 8TH. Prepared by Bernard and Jo Sullivan 10/08/2008 Page 1 Son (S) or Book Num Dau Fathers Christian Mothers Christian No Page ber Date Year (D) Christian Name Names Name Surname Abode Father's Occupation Remarks Vicar Parish 1 1 1 14.01.1838 1838 D Mary Maria George Mary Jane Gandy Twyford Servant (born Dec(ember) 25 1837 James Hodges Vicar Twyford Junior - (born Dec(ewmber) 18 1 1 2 14.01.1838 1838
    [Show full text]
  • Sector Distribution
    Average weekly distribution Publisher’s Statement Mar ‘10; 80,344 Average weekly readership JICREG Apr ’10; N/A A 27 2 LOCKERLEY KIMBRIDGE BRAISHFIELD HURSLEY TWYFORD MORESTEAD AWBRIDGE AMPFIELD OTTERBOURNE OWSLEBURY SHOOTASH CRAMPMOOR COLDEN COMMON ROMSEY UPHAM EAST WELLOW CHANDLERS FORD PLAITFORD BLACKHILL ASHFIELD EASTLEIGH FAIR OAK LEE M 27 OWER ROWNHAMS BRAMSHAW DURLEY CALMORE BROOK WEST END WINSOR TOTTON CURDRIDGE BARTLEY SOUTHAMPTON HEDGE END MINSTEAD ASHURST MARCHWOOD BURRIDGE BURSLEDON WHITELEY NETLEY LYNDHURST HYTHE LOCKS HEATH WARSASH TITCHFIELD HOLBURY FAWLEY STUBBINGTON BROCKENHURST BEAULIEU CALSHOT EAST BOLDRE EXBURY SWAY BOLDRE PORTMORE EAST END HORDLE LYMINGTON COWES West Edition Established Content East Edition July 2006 Property Frequency Community News Weekly (Thursday) Entertainment Classified Cover price Recruitment Free Motoring Household Coverage Page size 61%* 32x9 *Publisher’s Statement Mar 2010 & TGI 2008 Postal sector breakdown West Edition: East Edition: Sector Distribution Sector Distribution SO14 3 756 PO15 7 1433 SO15 0 470 SO18 1 2721 SO15 1 202 SO18 2 2489 SO15 2 2046 SO18 3 1849 SO15 3 2124 SO18 4 1584 SO15 4 1079 SO18 5 2699 SO15 5 4224 SO18 6 944 SO15 7 798 SO19 0 1711 SO15 8 1381 SO19 1 1059 SO16 0 370 SO19 2 2013 SO16 2 200 SO19 4 478 SO16 3 3196 SO19 5 285 SO16 4 938 SO19 6 1362 SO16 5 2152 SO19 7 2084 SO16 6 2429 SO19 8 3422 SO16 7 1572 SO19 9 3256 SO16 8 4369 SO31 1 125 SO16 9 955 SO31 4 1370 SO17 1 2650 SO31 5 1935 SO17 2 2363 SO31 6 2935 SO17 3 1080 SO40 2 381 SO31 7 916 SO40 3 2940 SO31 8 2021
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Character Assessment
    Twyford Parish Landscape Assessment - Part 1: Landscape Character Assessment Twyford Parish Landscape Assessment Part 1: Landscape character assessment Cedar Court, 5 College Street, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU31 4AE tel: +44 (0)1730 262040 | Twyford Parish Landscape Assessment - Part 1: Landscape Character Assessment CONTENTS 1.INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 2.LANDSCAPE SETTING................................................................................................ 2 2.1 Location 2 2.2 Landscape Designation - South Downs National Park 2 2.3 Landscape Character Context 2 2.4 Topography and Hydrology 3 2.5 Vegetation and Ecology 4 2.6 Historic landscape 4 2.7 Perceptual/Experiential Landscape 5 2.8 Settlement Pattern 5 2.9 Settlement Gaps 6 2.10 Setting of Winchester 6 2.11 Important visual landmarks and features within area and wider context 6 2.12 Key views from wider landscape 6 3.TWYFORD PARISH LANDSCAPE CHARACTER AREAS ......................................... 7 3.1 Twyford Landscape Character Area A – Itchen Valley North 9 3.2 Landscape Character Area B – Itchen Valley South 16 3.3 Landscape Character Area C – Itchen Valley Slopes 22 3.4 Landscape Character Area D – Hazeley Dry Valley 28 3.5 Landscape Character Area E – Twyford Down 35 3.6 Landscape Character Area F – Hazeley Down 42 3.7 Landscape Character Area G – Cockscomb Hill Downland Mosaic 48 4. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Town and Country Planning Acts 1990 Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990
    WINCHESTER CITY COUNCIL DECISIONS MADE BY THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS IN WINCHESTER DISTRICT, PARISH, TOWN AND WARD UP TO 11 March 2012 Town and Country Planning Acts 1990 Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990 DECISIONS MADE BY DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS UNDER DELEGATED POWERS UP TO 11 March 2012 For Guidance 1. Please note that if you wish to view the full decision details, which include any conditions or reasons for refusal, these can be accessed via the public access facility within the planning area of the council’s web site. The following link will take you to the relevant area where the case can be accessed using the quoted case number on the below list and clicking the ‘associated documents’ tab and searching the documents list for ‘decision’. Similarly the case officer’s report can be viewed in the case of delegated decisions, which explains the considerations taken into account in determining the application. Planning Applications Online Please note that there is a slight delay between the date that a decision is made and the date the decision notice is displayed on the website. The decision notice will be published to the website 2 days after the date of the decision. 2. Reports and minutes of applications determined by the planning committee can be viewed in the committees section of the council’s web site, which can be accessed via the following link. Planning Development Control Committee If you require any further information, please enquire at Planning Reception, City Offices, Colebrook Street, Winchester, SO23 9LJ quoting the Case Number.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Hierarchy
    Winchester District Development Framework Market Towns and Rural Area Development Strategy Background Paper July 2011 ii Contents 1 Introduction ...........................................................................................1 2 Spatial context of Winchester District....................................................2 3 Policy Background ................................................................................4 National Policy Background......................................................................4 Local Policy Background...........................................................................6 • Blueprint.........................................................................................6 • Rural Masterplanning.....................................................................7 4 Revised Methodology..........................................................................12 • Sustainability assessment criteria ................................................12 • Population ....................................................................................17 • Employment .................................................................................17 5 Results ................................................................................................18 • Settlement Profiles.......................................................................23 • Settlement Hierarchy....................................................................23 6 Conclusions – the revised settlement strategy ....................................25
    [Show full text]
  • Mr. Tony Bronk
    Written Statement from Mr T. Bronk (an individual) further to representation response number 027090277 objecting to the Eastleigh Borough Council draft Local Plan 1. My representation stated I was unsure whether the matters I raised fall within the category of Legal and Compliance. 2. My Representation stated I was opposed to the following parts of the draft Local Plan in respect of sustainability and infrastructure: DM3; and in respect of Transport: Policy S6 (do you support or object to this policy on the new Allbrook, Bishopstoke and Fair Oak link road); and Policy S12 (do you support or object to this policy on transport infrastructure). I have identified that Matters 2 and 5 and issues therein are particularly relevant to my question whether the draft Local Plan has taken: “proper account of its impact on existing infrastructure” and whether in respect of all journeys arising because of the proposed developments Eastleigh Borough Council can be “reasonably satisfied those movements can be accommodated”. My Statement My representation challenged whether the proposed new Link Road including realignment of Highbridge Road (B3335) by Allbrook railway bridge was a reasonable mitigant to the increase of traffic that will be generated by the proposed new development. I provide the following information to show the inadequacies of the existing transport infrastructure and therefore to emphasise my continuing concern about Issue 2.5: “What reasonable alternatives have been considered to avoid these effects [negative or minor negative] and if they are avoidable, is the Plan justified?” The further documents issued in support of the draft Local Plan (such as SGO022 and TRA014a) confirm the inability of Allbrook bridge to accommodate large HGVs and double deck busses.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Note: Comments on the Use of Groundwater and River Flow Models, Focused on the Candover Stream Simulation in the Test and Itchen Model
    1 © Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited Technical Note: Comments on the use of groundwater and river flow models, focused on the Candover Stream simulation in the Test and Itchen Model Background and comments from World Wildlife Fund (UK) Scope, author and reviewer Rob Soley at Amec Foster Wheeler was asked by Southern Water Services to compile this Technical Note in response to comments made by WWF on the use of the Test and Itchen Groundwater (and River Flow) Model to support the assessment of flow impacts on the Candover Stream (sometimes named as the Candover Brook). Rob has led the development and use of groundwater and river flow models across many of the Chalk catchments in Southern and Eastern England. He has also worked closely with the Environment Agency and other regulators over the last 16 years to design and improve the water resource assessment and environmental flow screening approaches used in Catchment Abstraction Management Strategies, and in support of EU Habitats Directive and Water Framework Directive objectives across the UK. The note has been reviewed by Tim Power at Amec Foster Wheeler who has carried out or managed all of the groundwater and river flow modelling for the Test and Itchen. (Within the appendices to this report, there is reference to work carried out by Entec UK Ltd and AMEC E&I UK Ltd – both of which are predecessor companies to Amec Foster Wheeler E&I UK Ltd). Comments from WWF (UK) A joint letter from Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust (Chief Executive Debbie Tann)
    [Show full text]
  • Residents Within Pive Miles Op Winchester., [1918
    814 RESIDENTS WITHIN PIVE MILES OP WINCHESTER., [1918 Remsbery, Mrs., Enfield, Twyford. Steuart, F. G., Oakwood, Otterbourne. Rendall, Captain R. R., Orcadia, Steward, R., The Grange, Morestead. Compton. Stewart, Colonel Bruce, Hinton House, Richardson, R. Eden, Morestead House, King's Worthy. Morestead. Stratton, J., Chilcomb House. Ricketts, G. H. M., c.B., Foulis Court, Streatfeild, Rev. R. H., The Rectory, Eastleigh, S.O. King's Worthy. Rippon, Mrs., Otterbourne Hill, Otter- Suart, Rev. E. W., Curate, Hursley. bourne. Roberts, Dr. G. A. E., Twyford. Talbot, F. W., Pitt. Robertson, J. N., Ashdene, Shawford. Tanner, J., Yew Tree Cottage, Easton. Rolfe, Miss, The Cottage, Twyford. Tanner, Mrs., Littleton. Thompson, F., South Glen, Compton. Salwey, Miss, Glenlyn, Otterbourne. Thorn, W., Chilland Farm, Chilland. Sandell, Miss, Southcroft, Headbourne Thorold, J. E., Merdon Manor, Hursley. Worthy. Tidy, Whitworth, The Thatched Cottage, Sanders-Clark, H. S., Hill Cottage, Sparsholt. Spar!'lholt. Toogood, W., Sunnyside, Shawford. Scoble, H. T., The Dell, Colden Common. Trask, Mrs., The Cottage, Sparsholt. Seth-Smith, Newton, Manor House, Trimmer, H., Hockley House, Twyford. Littleton. Turner, Skinner, Westholme, Harestock. Seymour, Miss, InholmeH, Shawford. Turnor, Miss, King's Worthy House, Shakspeare, Mrs., Ashurst, Twyford. King's Worthy. Shefferd, Mrs., Easton. Shelley, Captain Sir John C. F.., Bart., Walden, N ..J., St. Winifred's, Twyford. A vington Park. Walpole, The Misses, The Lodge, Spar- Shelley, P. B.,Lovington Farm,Avington. sholt. Shelley, Hubert, Lovington Farm, Aving­ Warre, G. A., Twyford House, Twyford. ton. Way, Philip, Hillside, Shawford. Shiel, Miss, Coppice End, Shawford. Welsh, W., Owslebury House, Owsle­ Shipley, Mrs. Conway, Twyford Moors, bury. Twyford.
    [Show full text]
  • Town and Country Planning Acts 1990 Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990
    WINCHESTER CITY COUNCIL DECISIONS MADE BY THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS IN WINCHESTER DISTRICT, PARISH, TOWN AND WARD UP TO 18 March 2012 Town and Country Planning Acts 1990 Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990 DECISIONS MADE BY DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS UNDER DELEGATED POWERS UP TO 18 March 2012 For Guidance 1. Please note that if you wish to view the full decision details, which include any conditions or reasons for refusal, these can be accessed via the public access facility within the planning area of the council’s web site. The following link will take you to the relevant area where the case can be accessed using the quoted case number on the below list and clicking the ‘associated documents’ tab and searching the documents list for ‘decision’. Similarly the case officer’s report can be viewed in the case of delegated decisions, which explains the considerations taken into account in determining the application. Planning Applications Online Please note that there is a slight delay between the date that a decision is made and the date the decision notice is displayed on the website. The decision notice will be published to the website 2 days after the date of the decision. 2. Reports and minutes of applications determined by the planning committee can be viewed in the committees section of the council’s web site, which can be accessed via the following link. Planning Development Control Committee If you require any further information, please enquire at Planning Reception, City Offices, Colebrook Street, Winchester, SO23 9LJ quoting the Case Number.
    [Show full text]
  • Act 1990 LIST of NEW PLANNING and OTHER
    Town and Country Planning Acts 1990 Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990 LIST OF NEW PLANNING AND OTHER APPLICATIONS, RECEIVED AND VALID IN PARISH/TOWN WARD ORDER WEEKLY LIST AS AT 15 January 2012 For Guidance 1 Those applications which have a star by them are FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. Please see over for a list and description of application types. 2 If the Grid Reference is blank, this is because it is a property which is in the process of being entered on the Property Database for the District. 3 The Conservation Area only appears where the application is known to be in a Conservation Area. 4 Where the application has not been allocated to a case officer, “Team Manager “ for the relevant area appears instead. 5 The Publicity Period is 21 days after the Site Notice Date or 21 days after a Press Advert date, where this has been made, whichever is the later. Applications may be determined after this date. If you require any further information, please enquire at Main Reception, City Offices, Colebrook Street, Winchester, SO23 9LJ quoting the Case Number. We will then be able to give you the current status of the application. We are open Monday to Thursday 8.30am - 5.00pm, Fridays 8.30am - 4.30pm, excluding Bank and Public Holidays. Page 1 APPLICATION CODES AND DESCRIPTION AVC Full Advert Consent AVT Temporary Advert Consent (non-standard time limit) AGA Agricultural Application APN Agricultural Prior Notification CER Certificate of Alternative Use CHU Change of Use DEC Demolition Consultation EUC Established
    [Show full text]