Chapter 2 Sustainable Mobility, the Context for the Promotion of Bike-Rail Integration

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 2 Sustainable Mobility, the Context for the Promotion of Bike-Rail Integration BIKE-RAIL INTEGRATION AS ONE SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT SOLUTION TO REDUCE CAR DEPENDENCE HENRIETTA SHERWIN A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the University of the West of England, Bristol for a PhD Centre for Transport and Society, Faculty of the Environment and Technology, May 2010 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would particularly like to thank my primary supervisor Professor Graham Parkhurst who initially supported the idea for this PhD and as a result of working in the same Centre has had to shoulder the main burden of supervision which he has done with considerable patience. This does not diminish the contribution of my other supervisors, despite their geographical distance, Derek Robbins at the University of Bournemouth and Ian Walker at Bath University, who have both given generously of their time and expertise to help shape this project. My colleagues at the Centre for Transport and Society have all helped in their individual ways and I have felt very privileged to work with them. This project would not have developed in the way that it did without the support and collaboration of Andrew Saunders at First Great Western, Tim Caswell and Jo Kyne at Hourbike, Mike Ginger formerly Bristol City Council now Highways Agency, Andy Whitehead and Phil Wright Bristol City Council and Steve Ward University of the West of England‘s (UWE) travel planner. Finally the support of my family has been paramount. This research programme was carried out in collaboration with First Great Western Trains (FGW) as a Great Western Research Studentship which is expected to contribute to knowledge that will assist regional development as well as knowledge exchange between the private sector and academic institutions in the South West, in this case, Bath University, Bournemouth University and the University of the West of England. Access to the rail network and the perspective of the rail industry has been provided by the private sector partner, First Great Western and the information exchanged could inform policy changes within the rail industry, as well as other organisations within the South West and other parts of the country, with an interest in promoting more sustainable travel options ii ABSTRACT The level of bike-rail integration (combining cycling with rail) in the UK presents an unrealised sustainable mobility potential: two per cent of rail passengers access the rail network by bicycle, contrasting with 40 per cent in the Netherlands. Cycling on its own has distance limitations but in combination with rail it can substitute for longer car journeys and is one means of reducing car dependence. The overall objective of this PhD research project was to understand existing bike-rail integration behaviour in the UK, using as the research location two stations in the South West of England (Bristol Temple Meads and Bristol Parkway), to inform the design, development and implementation of initiatives to increase its incidence. It therefore had two distinct research phases: an exploratory phase and an action research phase. The exploratory phase demonstrated that bike-rail integrators were mainly motivated by saving time or money and taking exercise. The majority were male, in their thirties, in full- time employment and cycled on average 3.7 km to the station. These data in conjunction with a conceptual „ecological‟ model developed from a critical review of behaviour change theory were used to inform the design and implementation of a pay-as-you-go self-hire cycle network (Hourbike) and an intervention to attract car drivers to switch to rail with either walking or cycling access. In the first year of Hourbike, seven per cent of users had never really cycled before and one per cent of car drivers responded to the opportunity to try rail with walking or cycling access rendering rich qualitative data from non-users about the attractors and barriers to bike-rail integration. The process of incorporating theory into practice is described providing useful insights for future interventions which are discussed in the light of theory. Opportunities are identified in the context of the national policy to implement station travel plans which emerged in the latter phases of the research. iii Contents page Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 2 Sustainable mobility, the context for the promotion of bike-rail integration ....... 8 2.2 The growth of transport and its impact............................................................................ 8 2.3 Car dependence; the implication for behaviour change to bike-rail integration ....... 14 2.4 A shift in UK transport policy .......................................................................................... 23 2.5 The policy context for the promotion of bike-rail integration ...................................... 26 2.6 Summary and conclusion ................................................................................................ 30 Chapter 3 Promotion of bike-rail integration:opportunities and constraints ....................... 31 3.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 31 3.2 Cycling in the UK .............................................................................................................. 32 3.3 Cycling in other northern European countries ............................................................. 37 3.4 Experience of promoting cycling in the UK ................................................................... 39 3.5 The existing practice of bike-rail integration ................................................................. 45 3.5.1 The provision of cycle parking ..................................................................................... 47 3.5.2 Factors to consider in the design of an intervention to promote bike-rail integration .. 50 3.6 Summary and conclusion ................................................................................................ 53 Chapter 4 Behaviour change and decision making ................................................................ 55 4.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 55 4.2 Transport context and rational decision making .......................................................... 56 4.2.1 Rational decision making............................................................................................. 57 4.2.2 The framing of decision making – the choice architecture .......................................... 59 4.2.3 Habit ............................................................................................................................ 61 4.2.4 Information and the perception of alternatives ............................................................ 62 4.2.5 Attitudes – how important? .......................................................................................... 64 4.3 Life stage and personal characteristics ......................................................................... 65 4.4 Social and cultural context .............................................................................................. 70 4.4.1 The perception of the safety of cycling ........................................................................ 73 4.4.2 The image of cycling and the lack of a cycling culture ................................................ 74 4.5 The interaction of influencing factors ............................................................................ 75 4.6 The relevance for the design of interventions .............................................................. 76 iv Chapter 5 Social marketing and social diffusion – theory into practice .............................. 78 5.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 78 5.2 Social marketing ............................................................................................................... 79 5.3 Social Learning and Social Diffusion Theory ................................................................ 82 5.4 How can social marketing be applied to bike-rail integration in practice? ................ 86 5.4.1 Identifying your target audience – segmentation? ...................................................... 90 5.4.2 Summary and relevance to this research project ........................................................ 93 Chapter 6 Overall research strategy and Methodology ......................................................... 94 6.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 94 6.2 Research questions ......................................................................................................... 95 6.3 Overall research strategy and approach........................................................................ 97 6.4 Location ............................................................................................................................. 99 6.5 Exploratory phase methodology .................................................................................. 104 6.5.1 Cycle parking counts ................................................................................................. 104 6.5.2 Barrier counts
Recommended publications
  • Summary of Outcomes of the Cycling Demonstration Towns and Cycling City and Towns Programmes
    Summary of Outcomes of the Cycling Demonstration Towns and Cycling City and Towns Programmes Lynn Sloman, Andy Cope, Angela Kennedy, Fiona Crawford, Nick Cavill and John Parkin Report to the Department for Transport April 2017 The preferred citation for this paper is: Sloman L, Cope A, Kennedy A, Crawford F, Cavill N and Parkin J (2017) Summary of outcomes of the Cycling Demonstration Towns and Cycling City and Towns programmes This report was written by Transport for Quality of Life, based on analysis carried out by Sustrans Research and Monitoring Unit with Cavill Associates and University of the West of England, Bristol. www.transportforqualityoflife.com www.sustrans.org.uk www.cavill.net www.uwe.ac.uk Acknowledgements The authors are grateful for the extensive assistance of officers in the six Cycling Demonstration Towns and 12 Cycling City and Towns in providing monitoring data for this research. We are also grateful for additional support provided by Lisa Muller, Katie Pullen, George Macklon, Katie Thomson, James O’Hare, Richard Sanders, Alison Janes, Hannah Delaney, Laurence Bonner, Peter Stephenson, Charlotte Draycott and Jo Watson. Disclaimer Although this report was commissioned by the Department for Transport (DfT), the recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the DfT. While every effort has been made to ensure the information in this document is accurate, DfT does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of that information; and it cannot accept liability for any loss or damages of any kind resulting from reliance on the information or guidance this document contains.
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Cycling Town: Compilation
    Making a Cycling Town: a compilation of practitioners’ experiences from the Cycling Demonstration Towns programme Qualitative Survey 2005-2009 Contents Abbreviations & Glossary 5 Introduction 6 Acknowledgements 7 Chapter 1: ‘Lift Off’ for Cycling 9 Bikeability 13 Chapter 2: Cycling Programme Delivery Best Practice 15 Chapter 3: Cycling Demonstration Town Stories 27 Aylesbury 28 Brighton & Hove 34 Darlington 40 Derby 46 Exeter 52 Lancaster with Morecambe 58 Chapter 4: Common Elements of the Programmes 65 Infrastructure 66 Marketing and Enabling Cycling 72 Schools and Bikeability 79 Workplaces 86 2 Figures and Tables Figure 2.1: Average Proportion of Budget Spent by Measure 21 Figure 3.1: Aylesbury Programme Summary 28 Figure 3.2: Brighton & Hove Programme Summary 34 Figure 3.3: Darlington Programme Summary 40 Figure 3.4: Derby Programme Summary 46 Figure 3.5: Exeter Programme Summary 52 Figure 3.6: Lancaster with Morecambe Programme Summary 58 Figure 4.1: Marketing Channels & Tools Used by the Cycling Demonstration Towns 73 Figure 4.2: Bikeability and Bike It Participation by Cycling Demonstration Town 79 Table 2.1: Average Staff Time Invested by Measure 18 Table 4.1: Investment in Infrastructure 71 Table 4.2: CDT Information Resources & Distribution Channels 72 Table 4.3: Investment in Marketing and Enabling Cycling Initiatives 77 Table 4.4: Investment in Cycling Promotion at Schools 84 Table 4.5: Investment in Cycling Promotion at Workplaces 89 Box 2.1: Examples of Internal Teams Supporting CDT Delivery 19 Box 2.2: Examples of External
    [Show full text]
  • Public Bicycle Schemes
    Division 44 Water, Energy and Transport Recommended Reading and Links on Public Bicycle Schemes September 2010 Reading List on Public Bicycle Schemes Preface Various cities around the world are trying methods to encourage bicycling as a sustainable transport mode. Among those methods in encouraging cycling implementing public bicycle schemes is one. The public bicycle schemes are also known as bicycle sharing systems, community bicycling schemes etc., The main idea of a public bicycle system is that the user need not own a bicycle but still gain the advantages of bicycling by renting a bicycle provided by the scheme for a nominal fee or for free of charge (as in some cities). Most of these schemes enable people to realize one way trips, because the users needn’t to return the bicycles to the origin, which will avoid unnecessary travel. Public bicycle schemes provide not only convenience for trips in the communities, they can also be a good addition to the public transport system. Encouraging public bike systems have shown that there can be numerous short that could be made by a bicycle instead of using motorised modes. Public bike schemes also encourage creative designs in bikes and also in the operational mechanisms. The current document is one of the several efforts of GTZ-Sustainable Urban Transport Project to bring to the policymakers an easy to access list of available material on Public Bike Schemes (PBS) which can be used in their everyday work. The document aims to list out some influential and informative resources that highlight the importance of PBS in cities and how the existing situation could be improved.
    [Show full text]
  • City Bike Hire Schemes
    1 1 City Bike Hire Schemes - Emerging Trends in Europe 2 3 4 Stephen Parkes 5 6 Institute for Transport Studies 7 University of Leeds 8 Leeds 9 LS2 9JT 10 United Kingdom 11 Tel: +44 (0)113 343 1787 12 [email protected] 13 14 15 Dr Greg Marsden* 16 17 Institute for Transport Studies 18 University of Leeds 19 Leeds 20 LS2 9JT 21 United Kingdom 22 Tel: +44 (0)113 343 5325 23 Fax: +44 (0)113 343 5334 24 [email protected] 25 26 * corresponding author 27 28 Word Count: 5989 + 6 Figures = 7489 29 30 Submission Date: 14/11/2011 TRB 2012 Annual Meeting Paper revised from original submittal. 2 31 City Bike Hire Schemes - Emerging Trends in Europe 32 33 34 Abstract 35 36 This paper examines the recent increase in the uptake of city bike hire (also known as “bike 37 share”) schemes and provides an analysis of the emerging trends that are being witnessed. 38 The paper is based on an ongoing study into the spread and distribution in the adoption of 39 bike hire schemes throughout Europe. The data collection consists of two stages that first 40 seek to build a picture of the current situation before moving on to a more detailed discussion 41 with the scheme adopters. 42 The paper presents a brief history of bike hire schemes and describes the theoretical basis 43 for the investigation, drawing on innovation and diffusion theory. It then reports the findings 44 of the research, which suggests that the expansion phase of city adoption of public bike hire 45 schemes may be past its peak.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustrans Design Manual Chapter 9 Cycle and Rail Integration (Draft)
    Sustrans Design Manual • Chapter 9: Cycle and rail integration (2014, draft) Sustrans Design Manual Chapter 9 Cycle and Rail Integration (draft) December 2014 December 2014 1 Sustrans Design Manual • Chapter 9: Cycle and rail integration (2014, draft) About Sustrans Contents Sustrans makes smarter travel choices This chapter of the Sustrans Design Manual should be read in possible, desirable and inevitable. We’re conjunction with Chapter 1 “Principles and processes for cycle friendly a leading UK charity enabling people to design.” That chapter includes key guidance on core design principles, travel by foot, bike or public transport whether to integrate with or segregate from motor traffic, the space for more of the journeys we make every required by cyclists and other road users as well as geometrical day. We work with families, communities, considerations. Readers are also directed towards the “Handbook for policy-makers and partner organisations cycle-friendly design” which contains a concise illustrated compendium so that people are able to choose of the technical guidance contained in the Design Manual. This chapter healthier, cleaner and cheaper journeys, has initially been issued as a draft and it is intended that it be reviewed with better places and spaces to move during 2015; feedback on the content is invited and should be made by through and live in. 31 May 2015 to [email protected] It’s time we all began making smarter travel choices. Make your move and 1. Key principles support Sustrans today. www.sustrans. 2. Introduction org.uk 3. Travelling to the station Head Office 4. Routes into and within the station Sustrans 2 Cathedral Square 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Vergelijkende Studie Van Stedelijke Fietsverhuursystemen
    Academiejaar 2009 – 2010 UNIVERSITEIT ANTWERPEN FACULTEIT TOEGEPASTE ECONOMISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN Vergelijkende studie van stedelijke fietsverhuursystemen Jeroen Jonckheere Masterproef voorgedragen tot het bekomen van de graad van: Master in de Toegepaste Economische Promotor: Wetenschappen logistiek en transport Prof. dr. Ann Verhetsel Academiejaar 2009 – 2010 UNIVERSITEIT ANTWERPEN FACULTEIT TOEGEPASTE ECONOMISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN Vergelijkende studie van stedelijke fietsverhuursystemen Jeroen Jonckheere Masterproef voorgedragen tot het bekomen van de graad van: Master in de Toegepaste Economische Promotor: Wetenschappen logistiek en transport Prof. dr. Ann Verhetsel Voorwoord Een masterproef schrijven is een proces dat ongeveer een jaar duurt. In de loop van dit jaar krijg je hulp van een heleboel mensen. Ik wil dan ook gebruik maken van dit voorwoord om deze mensen te bedanken. De eerste persoon die ik wens te bedanken is professor Ann Verhetsel. Als promotor van mijn masterproef verbeterde zij op gepaste tijden mijn schrijfsels en gaf ze een aantal nuttige adviezen waarmee ik verder aan de slag kon. In tweede instantie zou ik ook Jan Schaeken van het Gemeentelijk Autonoom Parkeerbedrijf Antwerpen willen danken voor het geven van alle informatie die ik nodig had om het Antwerpse stedelijk fietsverhuursysteem te vergelijken met de al bestaande fietsverhuursystemen. In laatste instantie wil ik ook mijn ouders bedanken. Zij hebben er voor gezorgd dat ik 4 jaar lang heb kunnen studeren. Daarnaast wil ik hen ook nog bedanken voor het nalezen
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Bicycle Options for Federal Lands: Bike Sharing, Rentals and Employee Fleets
    FHWA-WFL/TD-12-001 JANUARY 2012 EXPLORING BICYCLE OPTIONS FOR FEDERAL LANDS: BIKE SHARING, RENTALS AND EMPLOYEE FLEETS Technical Report published by Technology Deployment Program Western Federal Lands Highway Division Federal Highway Administration 610 East 5th St. Vancouver, WA 98661 For more information or additional copies contact: Susan Law, Planning Team Leader [email protected], 360.619.7840 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-WFL/TD-12-001 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date January 2012 EXPLORING BICYCLE OPTIONS FOR FEDERAL LANDS: BIKE SHARING, RENTALS AND EMPLOYEE FLEETS 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Rebecca Gleason, Laurie Miskimins 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Western Transportation Institute P.O. Box 174250 11. Contract or Grant No. Bozeman, MT 59717-4250 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Federal Highway Administration Final Report Western Federal Lands Highway Division August 2009 – July 2011 610 East 5th St. Vancouver, WA 98661 14. Sponsoring Agency Code HFL-17 15. Supplementary Notes COTR: Susan Law – FHWA CFLHD/WFLHD. Advisory Panel Members: Adam Schildge – FTA, Alan Turnbull – NPS RTCA, Andrew Duvall, National Science Foundation IGERT PhD student, Brandon Jutz – FWS, Candace Rutt – CDC, Diana Allen – NPS RTCA, Franz Gimmler – non-motorized consultant, Ivan Levin – Outdoor Foundation, Jane D. Wargo – HHS, Jason Martz – NPS, Jim Evans – NPS, Nathan Caldwell – FWS, Paul DeMaio – Bike Share consultant, Tokey Boswell – NPS. This project was funded by the Fish and Wildlife Service Refuge Road Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Tech Capital Bikeshare Study a Closer Look at Casual Users and Operations
    Virginia Tech Capital Bikeshare Study A Closer Look at Casual Users and Operations Prepared by Prepared for DRAFT December 2011 This report is based on the work of these students in the Virginia Tech graduate-level Urban and Regional Planning program, Alexandria, Virginia, during the Fall 2011 semester: Natalie Borecki Bradley Rawls Buck, Darren Buck Paola Reyes Payton Chung Matthew Steenhoek Paticia Happ Casey Studhalter Nicholas Kushner Austin Watkins Tim Maher With the following Virginia Tech faculty member assisting the students in preparing the report: Ralph Buehler, PhD Virginia Tech Assistant Professor Department of Urban Affairs and Planning – Alexandria Campus This research was approved by the Virginia Tech Institutional Review Board (FWA00000572, expires May 31, 2014) under IRB numbers 11-784 and 11-902. Acknowledgments The authors of this report would like to express our gratitude to the following individuals for the information and assistance they provided: Our 340 survey participants Chris Holben - District Department of Transportation, Washington DC Paul DeMaio - MetroBike Danny Quarrell - Alta Bicycle Share Eric Gilliland - Alta Bicycle Share Mari Isabelle - JCDecaux Adam Garrett - OYBike Matt Virlee - Denver Bike Sharing Mitch Vars - Nice Ride Minnesota Iván De la Lanza - Enlace Institucional, SMA - EcoBici Rodrigo Guerrero Maldonado - Secretaria del Medio Ambiente, Mexico City Erik Kugler – BicycleSPACE Fionnuala Quinn – Alta Planning Shi-Hung Huang- Kaohsiung Environmental Protection Bureau Kwo-Tsai Wang - Kaohsiung Transportation Bureau Mu-Sheng Lee - Kaohsiung Environmental Protection Bureau Raúl Ganzinelli Aguilera - Barcelona de Serveis Municipals Jordi Cabañas Faura - Clear Channel International Matthias Wegscheider -CityBike Wien 2 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary, page 4 II. Introduction, page 4 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Bike-Sharing Systems and Congestion: Evidence from US Cities
    Journal of Transport Geography xxx (xxxx) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Transport Geography journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jtrangeo Bike-sharing systems and congestion: Evidence from US cities ⁎ Mingshu Wanga, , Xiaolu Zhoub a Department of Geography, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA b Department of Geology and Geography, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: In the past decades, there has been a resurgence of public bike-sharing systems (BSSs). While it is claimed that Bike-sharing systems social and environmental benefits are associated with the implementation of BSSs, few empirical studies have Congestion investigated the actual congestion reduction effect of BSSs on cities. To fill such gap, this paper aims to examine ff ff Di erence-in-di erences whether the launch of BSSs can reduce citywide congestion. With a panel dataset of 96 urban areas in the US Fixed effects model from 2005 to 2014, we employed a difference-in-differences model with two-way fixed-effects panel regression. United States The results suggested that the introduction of BSSs shows a significant mixed impact on congestion in general: Larger cities get better off but richer cities get worse off. Such results are consistent with both subsample re- gression with propensity score matching and different congestion measures. Post-hoc analysis reveals that BSSs have a significant positive effect on reducing rush-hour congestion. Finally, implications, limitations, and future work directions are offered 1. Introduction health benefits, including but not limited to congestion and emission reductions, flexible mobility, consumer financial savings, and positive A resurgence of (public) bike-sharing systems (BSSs) has been wit- health outcomes (Midgley, 2011; Shaheen et al., 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Bikesharing V Praze
    Bike sharing v Praze Leden 2014 Prohlášení Dokument je určen výhradně pro potřeby Hlavního města Prahy (dále jen „Město“), obsahuje rámcovou analýzu finanční proveditelnosti projektu zavedení systému bike sharingu v Praze (dále jen „Projekt“). Analýza byla vypracována Českou spořitelnou, a.s. (dále jen „Zhotovitel“) za vřelé a úzké spolupráce s poradenskou společností KPMG Česká republika. Zhotovitel by chtěl zároveň poděkovat za aktivní přístup a vedení paní JUDr. Krobové Hášové, projektové koordinátorce pro zavedení bike sharingu v Praze a poděkovat za získaná doporučení ze strany odborníků z této oblasti, konkrétně se jednalo o: Petr Kazda a Daniel Mourek – Nadace Partnerství, Jan Klenka – Nextbike, Charles Butler – Homeport, Jaroslav Martínek a Jitka Vrtalová – Centrum dopravního výzkumu, Laura Warren – London Transport Committee, JCDecaux a mnoha dalším. (Poznámka za účelem získání zahraničních zkušeností Zhotovitel oslovil zainteresované subjekty z cca 15 evropských měst s cílem získání konkrétnější představy o podmínkách fungování již existujících bike sharingových systémů.) . Bike sharing v Praze 2 1. Definice 2. Zahraniční zkušenosti 3. Získané zkušenosti a doporučení pro Prahu 4. Doporučení dalších kroků Bike sharing v Praze 3 Definice Co je to vlastně bike sharing . Jedná se o automatizovaný systém půjčování tzv. „veřejných kol“ pro širokou veřejnost . Jedná se o celosvětový fenomén fungující v cca 650 městech . Je nedílnou součástí dopravních systémů měst, alternativou ke standardním prvkům městské dopravy . Je ekologickým a zdraví prospěšným způsobem pohybu po městě . Podporuje udržitelný rozvoj měst . Je orientovaný na každodenní dojíždění nicméně doplněný o využití pro volný čas a turismus Systém bike sharingu je specifický v tom, že: . Kola se dají levně a rychle půjčit (i zaparkovat) .
    [Show full text]
  • Cycling City and Towns Programme Overview March 2010 Contents
    Cycling City and Towns Programme Overview March 2010 Contents Introduction 3 CyclingDemonstrationTowns–investmentpayingoff 3 EvaluatingtheimpactsoftheCyclingCityandTownsProgramme 4 CyclingCityandTownsprogrammes 4 PopulationofCyclingCityandTowns 5 LevelsofcyclingforCyclingCityandTowns 6 CyclingEnglandbudget 7 SummariesofCyclingCityandTowns’activity 8 Aylesbury 8 Blackpool 9 Brighton&Hove 9 GreaterBristol 10 Cambridge 11 Chester 12 Colchester 13 Darlington 14 Derby 15 Exeter 15 LancasterwithMorecambe 16 Leighton-Linslade 18 Shrewsbury 19 Southend-on-Sea 20 Southport 21 Stoke-on-Trent 21 Woking 22 York 23 2 Introduction Thereisgrowingrecognitionthatcyclingcanhelptacklesomeofthebiggestchallengesfacingthe countrytoday–andthefirstresultsfromtheoriginalsixCyclingDemonstrationTownshaveprovided robustevidencetosupportthis. Thisreportbrieflysetsoutthoseencouragingfindings,beforeprovidingbackgroundinformationonthe widerprogramme,alongwithcoredataaboutpopulation,fundingallocationandcyclinglevelsinall18 locations.ItalsoincludesasnapshotofkeyactivitiesineachCyclingCityorTown. Cycling Demonstration Towns – investment paying off CyclingEnglandwasformedin2005witharesponsibilitytoincreaseshorturbantripsbybikethrough thedeliveryofprojectsfortheDepartmentforTransport.Atlaunchweimplementedtwoflagship programmes:Bikeabilitytrainingforschoolchildren,andthedevelopmentofCyclingDemonstration Towns,wheretownsacrossEnglandinvestedintheirlocalcyclingprogrammesatalevelequivalentto thatofsuccessfulEuropeancycletowns,withtheaimofachievinganincreaseineverydaycyclingtrips.
    [Show full text]
  • European Best Practices in Bike Sharing Systems
    Grant EIE/07/239/SI2466287 T.aT. - Students Today, Citizens Tomorrow REPORT European Best Practices in Bike Sharing Systems National Report Coordinator: Panos Antoniades Local Mobility Coordinator: Andreas Chrysanthou June 2009 Grant EIE/07/239/SI2466287 Index Index________________________________________________________________ 2 1. Introduction ______________________________________________________ 3 2. Bike Sharing System _______________________________________________ 7 3. Overview of bike share systems elements ______________________________ 9 4. Types of Bike Sharing System_______________________________________ 12 4.1. Unregulated________________________________________________________ 13 4.2. Deposit ___________________________________________________________ 13 4.3. Membership _______________________________________________________ 13 4.3.1. Public-private partnership ___________________________________________ 13 4.4. Long-term checkout _________________________________________________ 14 4.5. Partnership with railway sector ________________________________________ 14 4.6. Partnership with car park operators ____________________________________ 15 5. Evolution of Bike Sharing System ___________________________________ 15 6. Operations ______________________________________________________ 17 7. European best practises____________________________________________ 21 8. Conclutions _____________________________________________________ 51 9. References ______________________________________________________ 54 2 T.aT. – Students
    [Show full text]