DOCSLIB.ORG

WFMP00102.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WFMP00102.Pdf FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0118 Case No. 86CW118 Colorado Springs vs SECWCD, AVDA, et al. Statement of opposition Pratt FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0118 Case No. 86CW118(A) Colorado Springs vs SECWCD, AVDA, et al. Stipulation Johnson/Carlson/Mitchell/Fahmy FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0118 Case No. 86CW118(A) Colorado Springs vs SECWCD, AVDA, et al. Stipulation , Johnson/Witten/Fahmy FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0118 Case No. 86CW118(A) Colorado Springs vs SECWCD, AVDA, et al. Proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, judgment and decree 12/17/91; 11/18/92 FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0118 Case No. 86CW118(A) Colorado Springs vs SECWCD, AVDA, et al. Trial data certificate of objector AVDA, et al. Mitchell FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0118 Case No, 86CW118(A) Colorado Springs vs SECWCD, AVDA, et al. Stipulation Paddock/Johnson/Leonhardt 125 FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0118 Case No. 86CW118(A) Colorado Springs vs SECWCD, AVDA, et al. Pretrial order (draft) FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0118 Case No. 86CW118(A) Colorado Springs vs SECWCD, AVDA, et al. Pretrial order John R. Tracey, Water Judge FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0118 Case No. 86CW118(A) Colorado Springs vs SECWCD, AVDA, et al. Motion for approval of stipulation Paddock FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0118 Case No. 86CW118(A) Colorado Springs vs SECWCD, AVDA, et al. Letters - Fairfield and Woods August 29, 1989; August 13, 1992 FILE CABINET A DRAWER 3 - FILE 0119 Case No. 86CW121 Aschermann, et al., being the minority shareholders of the Rocky Ford Ditch Company vs SECWCD Statement of opposition Pratt FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0119 Case No. 86CW121 Aschermann, et al., being the minority shareholders of the Rocky Ford Ditch Company vs SECWCD Order dismissing case, November 21, 1988 John R. Tracey, Water Judge 126 FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0120 Case No. 86SA132 Cogito N.V., The Erwin Interests, Inc., et al. vs Arapahoe Water and Sanitation District, et al. Appellants notice of appeal Dickson FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0121 Case No. 865C186 Pueblo West Metropolitan District vs SECWCD Southeastern's opposition brief (draft) June 4, 1984 FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0121 Case No. 865C186 Pueblo West Metropolitan District vs SECWCD Brief of appellant Krassa FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 FILE 0121 Case No. 86SC186 Pueblo West Metropolitan District vs SECWCD Opposition brief Holme/Epstein/Baker/Carlson FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0121 Case No. 865C186 Pueblo West Metropolitan District vs SECWCD Reply brief Krassa FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0121 Case No. 86SC186 Pueblo West Metropolitan District vs SECWCD Answer brief Holme/Baker/Hammond 127 FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0121 Case No. 86SC186 Pueblo West Metropolitan District vs SECWCD Motion in opposition to petitioner's motion to strike the Directors' answer brief Epstein FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0121 Case No. 86SC186 Pueblo West Metropolitan District vs SECWCD Reply brief of petitioner Krassa FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0121 Case No. 865C186 Pueblo West Metropolitan District vs SECWCD Request for oral argument Pratt FILE CABINET .A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0122 Case No. 86SA213 Zigan Sand and Gravel, Inc. vs Cache La Poudre Water Users Association, et al. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and case remanded FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0122 Case No. 865A213 Zigan Sand and Gravel, Inc. vs Cache La Poudre Water Users Association, et al. Appeal from the District Court in and for Water Division 1 Honorable Robert A. Behrman, Water Judge Montgomery FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0122 Case No. 865A213 Zigan Sand and Gravel, Inc. vs Cache La Poudre Water Users Association, et al. Order of Court February 12, 1987 128 • FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0122 Case No. 86SA213 Zigan Sand and Gravel, Inc. vs Cache La Poudre Water Users Association, et al. Letters - Moses, Wittemyer, Harrison and Woodruff, P.C. January 28, 1987 FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0123 Case No. 86SA301 Fort Lyon Canal/DOW vs Catlin Canal Company, AVDA, et al. Opening brief of the Fort Lyon Canal Company and the State of Colorado, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife Schroeder/Ladd FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0123 Case No. 86SA301 Fort Lyon Canal/DOW vs Catlin Canal Company, AVDA, et al. Answer brief of the Catlin Canal Company and AVDA Mitchell FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0123 Case No. 86SA301 Fort Lyon Canal/DOW vs Catlin Canal Company, AVDA, et al. Judgment affirmed FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0124 Case Nos. 86-1153, 86-1154, 86-1155 Sierra Club vs Richard E. Lyng, et al. Defendant-intervenors' memorandum on appellate jurisdiction Teigen/Miller/Shpall/Witte FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0124 Case Nos. 86-1153, 86-1154, 86-1155 Sierra Club vs Richard E. Lyng, et al. Supporting documents - Introduction 129 FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0124 Case Nos. 86-1153, 86-1154, 86-1155 Sierra Club vs Richard E. Lyng, et al. Letters - Davis, Graham & Stubbs June 17, 1986 FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0125 February 1986 Resume Cases filed in January, 1986 FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0126 Case No. 87CW5 Board of County Commissioners of Crowley County. Notice of transmittal Priscilla S. Lucero, Clerk FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0126 Case No. 87CW5 Board of County Commissioners of Crowley County Amended ruling of Referee Clyde B. Young, •Jr., Water Referee FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0127 Case No. 87CW50 Bovee's Trout Ranches vs Stillwater Resources & Investments, SECWCD, et al. Judgment and decree John E. Anderson, Water Judge FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Statement of opposition Mitchell FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Order, December 12, 1991 John R. Tracey, Water Judge 130 FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 • Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Certificate of mailing FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Motion to vacate pre-trial and motion for appoint of Independent Master for the purpose of evaluating re-vegetation Mitchell FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Aurora's supplemental response to AVDA's motion to vacate pre-trial and motion for appointment of Independent Master for the purpose of evaluating re-vegetation Dingess FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 111 Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Service list FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Buffalo Park Development's motion to withdraw its statement of opposition Williamson FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Findings of fact, conclusions of law, judgment and decree (drafts) May 14, 1993; June 28, 1993; October 21, 1993; November 4, 1993 131 FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Motion for order approving stipulation Dingess FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Stipulation, Aurora/Upper Arkansas Conservancy District Baker/Dingess FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Abbreviated trial data certificate Baker FILE CABINET A DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 •• Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Abbreviated trial data certificate Goulding FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Stipulation, Aurora/Jake 0. Broyles Goulding/Dingess FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Motion for order approving stipulation - Aurora Jake 0. Broyles Dingess 132 FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Trial data certificate - Aurora Dingess FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Southeastern's trial data certificate Leonhardt FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Trial data certificate Sims FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Trial data certificate of opposer City of Florence Krassa FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Trial data certificate by the Fort Lyon Canal Company Lefferdink FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Pre-trial order (draft) 133 FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 • Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Stipulation, Aurora/Southeastern (draft) FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Stipulation, Aurora/Southeastern Leonhardt/Dingess FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Supporting documents - Simulation of Rocky Ford Ditch Exchange Pueblo Reservoir to Upstream Sites FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Letters - Division of Wildlife September 17, 1993 FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Letters - Mitchell & Howell, P.C. May 27, 1993 FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0128 Case No. 87CW63 Aurora vs AVDA, et al. Letters - Petrick, Fendel & Dingess, P.C. November 4, 1991 134 FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0129 Case No. 87CW70 • Aries Properties, Inc. vs AVDA/Catlin Statement of opposition Mitchell FILE CABINET A - DRAWER 3 - FILE 0129 Case No. 87CW70 Aries Properties, Inc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Department of the Interior Miscellaneous Field Studies United States Geological Survey Map Mf-1628-A Pamphlet
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP MF-1628-A PAMPHLET MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF THE BUFFALO PEAKS WILDERNESS STUDY AREA, LAKE, PARK, AND CHAFFEE COUNTIES, COLORADO By D. C. Hedlund and G. A. Nowlan, U.S. Geological Survey and R. H. Wood, n, U.S. Bureau of Mines STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Under the provisions of the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, September 3, 1964) and the Joint Conference Report on Senate Bill 4, 88th Congress, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines have been conducting mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas. Areas officially designated as "wilderness," "wild," or "canoe" when the act was passed were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System, and some of them are presently being studied. The act provided that areas under consideration for wilderness designation should be studied for suitability for incorporation into the Wilderness System. The mineral surveys constitute one aspect of the suitability studies. The act directs that the results of such surveys are to be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report discusses the results of a mineral survey of the Buffalo Peaks Wilderness Study Area, Pike and San Isabel National Forests, Lake, Park, and Chaffee Counties, Colo. The area was established as a wilderness study area by Public Law 96-560, December 22, 1980. MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL SUMMARY STATEMENT During 1981 and 1982, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines conducted field investigations to evaluate the mineral resource potential of the Buffalo Peaks Wilde-ness Study Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Areas of the National Forest System, As of September 30, 2019
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the National Forest System As of September 30, 2019 Forest Service WO Lands FS-383 November 2019 Metric Equivalents When you know: Multiply by: To fnd: Inches (in) 2.54 Centimeters Feet (ft) 0.305 Meters Miles (mi) 1.609 Kilometers Acres (ac) 0.405 Hectares Square feet (ft2) 0.0929 Square meters Yards (yd) 0.914 Meters Square miles (mi2) 2.59 Square kilometers Pounds (lb) 0.454 Kilograms United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Areas of the WO, Lands National Forest FS-383 System November 2019 As of September 30, 2019 Published by: USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20250-0003 Website: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar-index.shtml Cover Photo: Mt. Hood, Mt. Hood National Forest, Oregon Courtesy of: Susan Ruzicka USDA Forest Service WO Lands and Realty Management Statistics are current as of: 10/17/2019 The National Forest System (NFS) is comprised of: 154 National Forests 58 Purchase Units 20 National Grasslands 7 Land Utilization Projects 17 Research and Experimental Areas 28 Other Areas NFS lands are found in 43 States as well as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. TOTAL NFS ACRES = 192,994,068 NFS lands are organized into: 9 Forest Service Regions 112 Administrative Forest or Forest-level units 503 Ranger District or District-level units The Forest Service administers 149 Wild and Scenic Rivers in 23 States and 456 National Wilderness Areas in 39 States. The Forest Service also administers several other types of nationally designated
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Small Vessel General Permit
    ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PUBLIC NOTICE The United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois has requested a determination from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources if their Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) are consistent with the enforceable policies of the Illinois Coastal Management Program (ICMP). VGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non-recreational vessels greater than or equal to 79 ft. in length. sVGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non- recreational vessels less than 79 ft. in length. VGP and sVGP can be viewed in their entirety at the ICMP web site http://www.dnr.illinois.gov/cmp/Pages/CMPFederalConsistencyRegister.aspx Inquiries concerning this request may be directed to Jim Casey of the Department’s Chicago Office at (312) 793-5947 or [email protected]. You are invited to send written comments regarding this consistency request to the Michael A. Bilandic Building, 160 N. LaSalle Street, Suite S-703, Chicago, Illinois 60601. All comments claiming the proposed actions would not meet federal consistency must cite the state law or laws and how they would be violated. All comments must be received by July 19, 2012. Proposed Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) SMALL VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS LESS THAN 79 FEET (sVGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended (33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
    Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,770 83 25,853 Alabama Totals 42,218 83 42,301 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,876 520 75,396 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,118 0 19,118 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,917 7 39,924 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 979,079 21,741 1,000,820 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,183 15 60,198 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,814 0 4,814 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,144,010 235 2,144,245 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 46,758 0 46,758 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,083 41 23,124 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 348,626 63 348,689 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 315,833 0 315,833 South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,593 834 83,427 Refresh Date: 10/14/2017
    [Show full text]
  • PIKE and SAN ISABEL NATIONAL FORESTS Antelope Creek (6,900 Acres)
    PIKE AND SAN ISABEL NATIONAL FORESTS Antelope Creek (6,900 acres) ......................................................................................................... 3 Aspen Ridge (14,200 acres) ............................................................................................................ 4 Babcock Hole (8,900 acres) ............................................................................................................ 5 Badger Creek (12,400 acres)........................................................................................................... 7 Boreas (10,200 acres)...................................................................................................................... 8 Buffalo Peaks East (5,700 acres) .................................................................................................... 9 Buffalo Peaks South (15,300 acres) .............................................................................................. 10 Buffalo Peaks West (8,300 acres) ................................................................................................. 12 Burning Bear (19,300 acres) ......................................................................................................... 13 Chicago Ridge (5,900 acres) ......................................................................................................... 14 Chipeta (28,700 acres) .................................................................................................................. 15 Cuchara North
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred Third Congress of the United States of America
    H. R. 631 One Hundred Third Congress of the United States of America AT THE FIRST SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three An Act To designate certain lands in the State of Colorado as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE AND DEFINITIONS. (a) SHORT TITLE.ÐThis Act may be cited as the ``Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993''. (b) DEFINITIONS.Ð(1) As used in this Act with reference to lands in the National Forest System, the term ``the Secretary'' means the Secretary of Agriculture. (2) As used in this Act with respect to lands not in the National Forest System, the term ``the Secretary'' means the Secretary of the Interior. SEC. 2. ADDITIONS TO THE WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM. (a) ADDITIONS.ÐThe following lands in the State of Colorado are hereby designated as wilderness and, therefore, as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System: (1) Certain lands in the Gunnison Resource Area adminis- tered by the Bureau of Land Management which comprise approximately 3,390 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled ``American Flats Additions to the Big Blue Wilderness Proposal (American Flats)'', dated January, 1993, and which are hereby incorporated in and shall be deemed to be a part of the wilderness area designated by section 102(a)(1) of Public Law 96±560 and renamed Uncompahgre Wilderness by section 3(f) of this Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Open Lands and Colorado Conservation Trust Merge to Create Future of Land Conservation in Colorado
    Our Land Our Water Our Future COLORADO OPEN L ANDSCAPES A NEWSLETTER OF COLORADO OPEN LANDS On a retreat at the Trinchera Ranch, the Board and staff of COL and CCT work out the details of merging together to form a stronger organization to ensure the protection of conserved lands in perpetuity. Photo by Catherine Austin. What’s Inside President’s Letter Colorado Open Lands and Page 3 Colorado Conservation Trust Meet COL’s Expanded Board and Staff Page 6 Merge to Create Future of Land With the merger complete, get a glimpse of the new people Conservation in Colorado energizing our work! Two of the most significant forces in land protection in Colorado, Colorado Open Lands Steve Wooten and Ken and the Colorado Conservation Trust merged effective October 1 of this year. Colorado Salazar, Award Recipients Open Lands will be the name of the successor organization, which incorporates all of the Page 5 staff and functions of the two previous organizations. In spite of torrential downpours, Two years ago, charged by the COL board to assess the future of land conservation over 300 people gathered together in the face of changing social and political priorities, Colorado Open Lands initiated to celebrate our awardees and a strategic planning process. While the effort was intended to create a course for hear about the merger! OPEN LANDS Colorado Open Lands, it evolved as a strategic plan for the land conservation industry. The framework became a serious analysis of perpetuity – what it means, what it takes, and how to get there. Our First Farm to Colorado Open Lands and the Colorado Conservation Trust have enjoyed a close Table Dinner working relationship since CCT’s inception.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadsides Volume 24 | No
    BROADSIDES VOLUME 24 | NO. 3 | FALL 2014 Fifty Years of Wilderness: BIDDERS WANTED! The Thrill of Success, The Agony of Defeat by Rose Chilcoat Those of us who it was a time to live in small reflect on how well towns and cities democracy could surrounded work. WildWild forfor by spectacular The Wilderness and diverse WildernessWilderness Act of 1964 is a public lands— shining example Online forests, deserts, Online of democracy. grasslands, Auction Howard Zahniser, Auction seashores— then president of the sometimes Wilderness Society, November 3–16th forget the day- penned 66 drafts of to-day reality the bill over nine most Americans Gear, years and attended experience: a life 18 public hearings. that does not Goodies, Details were debated, include thoughts Mardy Murie (left) and Alice Zahniser (right) stand before President Lyndon B. Johnson at the signing of the Wilderness Act of 1964. Both negotiated, clarified, of wilderness, Getaways women were there representing their husbands, Olaus Murie and and trade-offs made wildlife, and Howard Zahniser, who did not live to see the act become law. (this is why permitted the threats our livestock grazing is Galore! nation’s wild heritage face. Shelley and I just specifically authorized in Wilderness). Some spent four days in Washington, D.C.—the stew Score some great of the Act’s principle champions, Zahniser and of humanity and politics that is our nation’s Olaus Murie, did not live to see it become law. capital; where the pace is frenetic, the built items and help But ultimately, this signature piece of legislation environment dominates, and our elected support Broads passed with overwhelming bipartisan support.
    [Show full text]
  • FAIRPLAY, COLORADO Hunting | Ranching | Fly Fishing | Conservation
    DMFAIRPLAY, RanchCOLORADO Hunting | Ranching | Fly Fishing | Conservation Hunting | Ranching | Fly Fishing | Conservation DM Ranch FAIRPLAY, COLORADO Introduction lessed with a seamless blend of high quality Btrout fishing, big game hunting, privacy and shared boundary with public land the DM Ranch is an exquisite ranch, set against a dramatic backdrop of snow-covered peaks. Located 1.5 hours from Denver and Colorado Springs the DM Ranch is in close proximity to daily direct air service to nearly all of the major metro areas in the US, while maintaining its charming simplicity and quiet splendor. With approximately 2 ½ miles of the South Fork of the South Platte and another ½ mile of Twelvemile Creek meandering through the meadows, the ranch is home to a robust population of healthy trout. www.livewaterproperties.com Hunting | Ranching | Fly Fishing | Conservation Contact BRIAN HARTLEY associate broker O: 307.734.6100 C: 307.690.3155 Acreage In the shadows of nearby 14,000 ft peaks, known locally as “14’ers”, the DM Ranch is 615 ACRES comprised of 615 acres of lush riparian corridor, productive sub-irrigated meadows and COMPROMISED dry upland ground. The areas along the river, as well as a few pockets surrounding spring seeps are dense with vegetation which provides valuable shade as cover for an abundance OF HEALTHY AND of elk, mule deer and moose. VEGETATED LAND The majorityHunting | Rofan chingthe | Flsurroundingy Fishing | Conservation property is privately held, including a large legacy ranch with holdings to the east and north of the DM Ranch; the vast majority of this neighboring ranch is protected in perpetuity by a series of conservation easements with The Nature Conservancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain Region 2 – Historical Geography, Names, Boundaries
    NAMES, BOUNDARIES, AND MAPS: A RESOURCE FOR THE HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY OF THE NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM OF THE UNITED STATES THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION (Region Two) By Peter L. Stark Brief excerpts of copyright material found herein may, under certain circumstances, be quoted verbatim for purposes such as criticism, news reporting, education, and research, without the need for permission from or payment to the copyright holder under 17 U.S.C § 107 of the United States copyright law. Copyright holder does ask that you reference the title of the essay and my name as the author in the event others may need to reach me for clarifi- cation, with questions, or to use more extensive portions of my reference work. Also, please contact me if you find any errors or have a map that has not been included in the cartobibliography ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In the process of compiling this work, I have met many dedicated cartographers, Forest Service staff, academic and public librarians, archivists, and entrepreneurs. I first would like to acknowledge the gracious assistance of Bob Malcolm Super- visory Cartographer of Region 2 in Golden, Colorado who opened up the Region’s archive of maps and atlases to me in November of 2005. Also, I am indebted to long-time map librarians Christopher Thiry, Janet Collins, Donna Koepp, and Stanley Stevens for their early encouragement and consistent support of this project. In the fall of 2013, I was awarded a fellowship by The Pinchot Institute for Conservation and the Grey Towers National Historic Site. The Scholar in Resi- dence program of the Grey Towers Heritage Association allowed me time to write and edit my research on the mapping of the National Forest System in an office in Gifford Pinchot’s ancestral home.
    [Show full text]