Leadville I°X2° Quadrangle, Colorado

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Leadville I°X2° Quadrangle, Colorado UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Leadville I°x2° quadrangle, Colorado: a pre-assessment by Alan R. Wallace , Steve Ludington , Tom G. Lovering , D. L. Campbell 1 , J. E. Case2 , V.J.S. Grauch1 , and Daniel H. Knepper, Jr. Open-File Report 88-0074 1988 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Denver, Colorado -Menlo Park, California CONTENTS Page Preface................................................................. 1 I. Executive summary................................................. 2 II. Geology........................................................... 5 III. Geochemistry...................................................... 9 IV. Geophysics........................................................ 12 V. Mineral resource assessment....................................... 15 VI. Proposed work plan................................................ 21 VII. Appendices 1. Bibliography.................................................. 1-1 2. Geochemical element anomaly descriptions...................... 2-1 3. Interpretation of geophysical data............................ 3-1 4. Deposit model critical characteristics........................ 4-1 FIGURES Figure 1. Index figure................................................. 3 2. Map showing districts, wilderness and wilderness study areas, and geochemical tracts.............................. 10 3. Map showing tracts for Climax and porphyry-type deposits..... 18 4. Map showing tracts for polymetallic hydrothermal deposits.... 19 5. Map showing tracts for sandstone-hosted deposits............. 20 TABLES Table 1. Mining districts in the Leadville quadrangle.................. 4 2. Geochemical anomalies......................................... 11 3. Resource assessment........................................... 16 4. Base- and precious-metal mining areas......................... 17 PREFACE This document presents a proposal and work plan for an evaluation of the mineral resource potential of the Leadville I°x2° quadrangle in west-central Colorado under the Conterminous United States Mineral Resource Assessment Program (CUSMAP). The authors of the report assembled available published and unpublished information and data germane to the geology, geochemistry, geophysics, and economic mineral deposits in the quadrangle. The team then identified specific topical studies that, when completed and incorporated with existing information, would provide the data necessary to adequately evaluate the mineral resource potential of the Leadville quadrangle. The work plan covers 5 years 4 for data acquisition and 1 for preparation of the final report as well as a preliminary period of time during which existing data can be evaluated and some new data could be collected. Owing to the lack of adequate data for resource assessment, this report does not attempt to provide, nor should it be construed to be, a preliminary resource assessment of the quadrangle. However, the available data suggest that the quadrangle has a high resource potential for a number of important commodities. I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Leadville I°x2° quadrangle is situated in west-central Colorado in the heart of the southern Rocky Mountains (fig. 1). The area combines a complex geologic setting with an impressively diverse and bountiful resource potential. A Conterminous U.S. Resource Assessment Program (CUSMAP) evaluation of the quadrangle by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) would provide an ideal opportunity to refine assessment techniques and increase our scientific understanding of mineral deposits. The proposed study area is underlain by a lithologically and structurally complex Proterozoic crystalline basement, exposed in deeply incised uplifts, which is overlain by a thick accumulation of Phanerozoic sedimentary rocks. Mesozoic and Tertiary plutons and volcanic rocks are exposed throughout the quadrangle. Stream sediment samples were collected throughout the quadrangle as part of the National Uranium Resource Evaluation (NURE) and Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management Wilderness programs. The resulting data are in part reflections of known mineralized areas. However, they also identify numerous areas of interest outside of those areas, as well as suggest different model types within recognized districts, which should be evaluated further during a full-scale resource assessment. Unfortunately, molybdenum, which is present in the world-class Climax-type deposits, was not analyzed for during the NURE program. Geophysical data emphasize the complexity and diversity of the study area. Aeromagnetic and gravity maps suggest that, where covered by Phanerozoic rocks, the crystalline bedrock, where not exposed, is present at relatively shallow depths in much of the eastern half of the quadrangle. In addition, the geophysical data suggest the presence of deep intrusions. Remote sensing and radiometric maps point to regions within the study area where low-temperature ground-water processes could have concentrated minerals. The Leadville quadrangle contains three of the most productive precious- metal districts in the United States, Leadville, Aspen, and Gilman, as well as Climax, the world's largest molybdenum deposit. More than 39 other districts are present as well (table 1). There are also indications for the possible occurrence of a wide variety of other resources, including syngenetic metal deposits, industrial minerals, and fuels. Expected Benefits Scientific The knowledge of the geologic setting is relatively good, and the quadrangle contains an impressive diversity of mineral deposit types. Within this context, therefore, the Leadville quadrangle offers an exceptional opportunity to actively concentrate on topical studies related to ore deposits and their geologic context. The studies should be interdisciplinary and should incorporate all available facilities and capabilities. Interaction between the CUSMAP study and current and proposed projects would be mutually beneficial to all projects. The scientific products would also fuel future research in the area and region. .109 10B____ 107______KM IDS 104. 103 102 I I 1 40 Owiw Cgtbondolrs. Fryinqpon Rtvtr BoMlt Figure 1. Index map showing the location of the Leadville quadrangle and selected geographic and geologic features. Broken lines in southeast part of quadrangle outline gravity low described by Tweto and Case (1972) Table 1. Summary of Mining Districts, Leadville Quadrangle, Colorado DISTRICT COUNTY DEPOSIT TYPE Alicante-Birdseye Lake Al Alma Park Bl, B2, E Ashcroft Pitkin B2 Aspen Pitkin Bl, B2 Avalanche Pitkin B2 Breckenridge Summit Al, A2, B2, D, E Brush Creek Eagle C Buckskin Park A1.B1 Burns-McCoy Eagle E Climax Lake A1,A2,D Consolidated Montgomery Park Al Frisco Summit Al Upper Fryingpan Pitkin Al Fulford Eagle A1,B1 Gilman-Redcliff Eagle Al, Bl, B3 Granite Chaffee A1,E Green Mountain Summit A2,B2 Holy Cross Eagle Al Homestake Eagle Al Homestake Peak Lake Al Horseshoe Park Bl Independence Pitkin A1,A3 Leadville Lake A1,A3, B1,E Lenado Pitkin Bl, B2 Lincoln Gulch Pitkin A3 Mosquito Park A3,B1 Richmond Hill Pitkin Bl Rifle Creek Vanadium Garfield C Rifle - Elk Creek Garfield Bl, B2 Rock Creek (Crystal River) Gunnison B2 Sacramento Park Bl Snowmass Pitkin C St Kevin - Sugarloaf Lake Al Tenmile Summit B2 Tennessee Pass Lake A2,B1 Twin Lakes Lake A1,A3 Upper Blue River Summit A1,B1,B2,E Weston Pass Park Bl Yarmony Routt C Key to Deposit Types; Al - Au- and Ag-bearing veins in Precambrian rocks. A2 - Au-, Ag-, and base-metal veins in Tertiary intrusive rocks. A3 - Au- and Ag-bearing veins in Tertiary volcanic rocks. Bl - Ag-Pb-Zn veins in Paleozoic carbonate rocks. B2 - Base-metal vein and replacement deposits in sedimentary rocks C - Sandstone-type deposits in clastic sedimentary rocks. D - Disseminated porphyry and stockwork deposits. E - Placer deposits. Economic The preliminary mineral resource assessment indicates that the Leadville quadrangle has a high potential for undiscovered resources of a variety of metals and other important commodities. A full-scale assessment would delineate specific areas for known deposit types, and it could possibly identify deposit types heretofore unknown in the area. A CUSMAP resource assessment could make an enormous economic contribution both locally and nationally. Political The CUSMAP study would draw upon or interact with other U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) projects and programs. These include: * More than fifteen Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) wilderness areas that have been studied within the quadrangle; * Projects that are currently in progress or are being proposed that would pertain to resource assessment of the quadrangle; and * Current DAT projects that include studies of the Leadville district, northern Sawatch Range mineral deposits, and the geochronology of central Colorado intrusive rocks and mineral deposits. In addition, the strong research interest in various aspects of the quadrangle shown by universities throughout the country invites active interaction with academia. II. GEOLOGY The geology of the Leadville I°x2° quadrangle represents more than 1.8 billion years of active tectonism, extensive plutonism, and cratonic sedimentation. During that time, geologic processes created substantial accumulations of mineral and energy resources, some of which have been tapped and others that undoubtedly await discovery. The geology of the quadrangle is shown in Tweto
Recommended publications
  • Bailey Mark Hopkins 1980
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF MARK H. BAILEY for the degree of Master of Science in Geology presented on June 7, 1979 Title: BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF WESTERN TAYLOR PARK, GUNNISON COUNTY, COLORADO Signature redacted for privacy. Abstract approved: I ._&V_j - Dr. Robert D. Lawrence The western Taylor Park area covers about 65 square miles on the western flank of the Sawatch Range. It is underlain chiefly by Precambrian rocks, partiallycovered on the east by glacial debris andoverlapped on the west and south by Paleozoic sedimentary rocks. The Precambrian rocks include a group ofmetasedimen- tary rocks of an undetermined age greaterthan 1700 m.y. The metasedimentary rocks include five mineralogicallydis- tinct units, quartzite, quartz-muscovite schist, quartz- epidote schist, quartz-plagioclase-biotite schist,and quartz-biotite-microcline-sillimaflite schist. The higher grade sillimanite-bearing biotite schists arerestricted to the western half of the map area and closelyassociated with the Forest Hill granitic rocks. The metasedimentary rocks were intruded twiceduring Precambrian time. The oldest intrusive event resulted in syntectonic emplacement of granodiorite and biotite tona- lite rocks. These rocks correlate with the 1700 m.y.old Denny Creek granodiorite gneiss and Kroenkegranodiorite which are mapped and informally named in the adjoining Mount Harvard quadrangle. The second, post-tectonic, igneous eventproduced granitic rocks that are dated at 1030 m.y. byRb-Sr meth- ods. These rocks include two comagmatic graniticphases, the Forest Hill porphyritic granite and the ForestHill cataclastic granite. A third phase, the Forest Hill horn- blende granodiorite, intrudes the porphyritic graniteand, therefore, is younger than the granitic phases. The 1030 m.y.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior Miscellaneous Field Studies United States Geological Survey Map Mf-1628-A Pamphlet
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP MF-1628-A PAMPHLET MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF THE BUFFALO PEAKS WILDERNESS STUDY AREA, LAKE, PARK, AND CHAFFEE COUNTIES, COLORADO By D. C. Hedlund and G. A. Nowlan, U.S. Geological Survey and R. H. Wood, n, U.S. Bureau of Mines STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Under the provisions of the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, September 3, 1964) and the Joint Conference Report on Senate Bill 4, 88th Congress, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines have been conducting mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas. Areas officially designated as "wilderness," "wild," or "canoe" when the act was passed were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System, and some of them are presently being studied. The act provided that areas under consideration for wilderness designation should be studied for suitability for incorporation into the Wilderness System. The mineral surveys constitute one aspect of the suitability studies. The act directs that the results of such surveys are to be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report discusses the results of a mineral survey of the Buffalo Peaks Wilderness Study Area, Pike and San Isabel National Forests, Lake, Park, and Chaffee Counties, Colo. The area was established as a wilderness study area by Public Law 96-560, December 22, 1980. MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL SUMMARY STATEMENT During 1981 and 1982, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines conducted field investigations to evaluate the mineral resource potential of the Buffalo Peaks Wilde-ness Study Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Areas of the National Forest System, As of September 30, 2019
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the National Forest System As of September 30, 2019 Forest Service WO Lands FS-383 November 2019 Metric Equivalents When you know: Multiply by: To fnd: Inches (in) 2.54 Centimeters Feet (ft) 0.305 Meters Miles (mi) 1.609 Kilometers Acres (ac) 0.405 Hectares Square feet (ft2) 0.0929 Square meters Yards (yd) 0.914 Meters Square miles (mi2) 2.59 Square kilometers Pounds (lb) 0.454 Kilograms United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Areas of the WO, Lands National Forest FS-383 System November 2019 As of September 30, 2019 Published by: USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20250-0003 Website: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar-index.shtml Cover Photo: Mt. Hood, Mt. Hood National Forest, Oregon Courtesy of: Susan Ruzicka USDA Forest Service WO Lands and Realty Management Statistics are current as of: 10/17/2019 The National Forest System (NFS) is comprised of: 154 National Forests 58 Purchase Units 20 National Grasslands 7 Land Utilization Projects 17 Research and Experimental Areas 28 Other Areas NFS lands are found in 43 States as well as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. TOTAL NFS ACRES = 192,994,068 NFS lands are organized into: 9 Forest Service Regions 112 Administrative Forest or Forest-level units 503 Ranger District or District-level units The Forest Service administers 149 Wild and Scenic Rivers in 23 States and 456 National Wilderness Areas in 39 States. The Forest Service also administers several other types of nationally designated
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadville National Fish Hatchery All Species Hunt Plan
    APPENDIX C Leadville National Fish Hatchery All Species Hunt Plan February 2019 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Leadville National Fish Hatchery 2846 Highway 300 Leadville, CO 80461 Lake County Submitted: ________________________________________________________ Project Leader Date Concurrence: _______________________________________________________ Geographical Supervisor (CO, UT, WY) Date Approval: _________________________________________________________ Assistant Regional Director – FAC Date The mission of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. Leadville National Fish Hatchery All Species Hunt Plan I. Introduction National Fish Hatcheries are guided by the mission and goals of the National Fish Hatchery System (NFH); the purposes of an individual hatchery; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) policy, laws and international treaties. The Leadville National Fish Hatchery resides on 3,072 acres in Lake County, Colorado. The Hatchery was created by Executive Order of President Benjamin Harrison in 1889 for the purpose of restoring depleted stocks of trout in the Upper Arkansas Region of Colorado, the Black hills of South Dakota, and Nebraska. At that time the main water supply for the hatchery was from Rock Creek. To protect the hatchery’s water supply, most of the Rock Creek drainage was included in the 3,072 acre hatchery land base. Leadville National Fish Hatchery is the second oldest federally operated fish hatchery in existence today and is one of the oldest surviving tangible examples of the historic legacy upon which the Service was first established. The hatchery is located in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado approximately six miles southwest of the city of Leadville.
    [Show full text]
  • COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail
    CONTINENTAL DIVIDE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL DAY & OVERNIGHT HIKES: COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail THE CENTENNIAL STATE The Colorado Rockies are the quintessential CDT experience! The CDT traverses 800 miles of these majestic and challenging peaks dotted with abandoned homesteads and ghost towns, and crosses the ancestral lands of the Ute, Eastern Shoshone, and Cheyenne peoples. The CDT winds through some of Colorado’s most incredible landscapes: the spectacular alpine tundra of the South San Juan, Weminuche, and La Garita Wildernesses where the CDT remains at or above 11,000 feet for nearly 70 miles; remnants of the late 1800’s ghost town of Hancock that served the Alpine Tunnel; the awe-inspiring Collegiate Peaks near Leadville, the highest incorporated city in America; geologic oddities like The Window, Knife Edge, and Devil’s Thumb; the towering 14,270 foot Grays Peak – the highest point on the CDT; Rocky Mountain National Park with its rugged snow-capped skyline; the remote Never Summer Wilderness; and the broad valleys and numerous glacial lakes and cirques of the Mount Zirkel Wilderness. You might also encounter moose, mountain goats, bighorn sheep, marmots, and pika on the CDT in Colorado. In this guide, you’ll find Colorado’s best day and overnight hikes on the CDT, organized south to north. ELEVATION: The average elevation of the CDT in Colorado is 10,978 ft, and all of the hikes listed in this guide begin at elevations above 8,000 ft. Remember to bring plenty of water, sun protection, and extra food, and know that a hike at elevation will likely be more challenging than the same distance hike at sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain National Park Lawn Lake Flood Interpretive Area (Elevation 8,640 Ft)
    1 NCSS Conference 2001 Field Tour -- Colorado Rocky Mountains Wednesday, June 27, 2001 7:00 AM Depart Ft. Collins Marriott 8:30 Arrive Rocky Mountain National Park Lawn Lake Flood Interpretive Area (elevation 8,640 ft) 8:45 "Soil Survey of Rocky Mountain National Park" - Lee Neve, Soil Survey Project Leader, Natural Resources Conservation Service 9:00 "Correlation and Classification of the Soils" - Thomas Hahn, Soil Data Quality Specialist, MLRA Office 6, Natural Resources Conservation Service 9:15-9:30 "Interpretive Story of the Lawn Lake Flood" - Rocky Mountain National Park Interpretive Staff, National Park Service 10:00 Depart 10:45 Arrive Alpine Visitors Center (elevation 11,796 ft) 11:00 "Research Needs in the National Parks" - Pete Biggam, Soil Scientist, National Park Service 11:05 "Pedology and Biogeochemistry Research in Rocky Mountain National Park" - Dr. Eugene Kelly, Colorado State University 11:25 - 11:40 "Soil Features and Geologic Processes in the Alpine Tundra"- Mike Petersen and Tim Wheeler, Soil Scientists, Natural Resources Conservation Service Box Lunch 12:30 PM Depart 1:00 Arrive Many Parks Curve Interpretive Area (elevation 9,620 ft.) View of Valleys and Glacial Moraines, Photo Opportunity 1:30 Depart 3:00 Arrive Bobcat Gulch Fire Area, Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest 3:10 "Fire History and Burned Area Emergency Rehabilitation Efforts" - Carl Chambers, U. S. Forest Service 3:40 "Involvement and Interaction With the Private Sector"- Todd Boldt; District Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service 4:10 "Current Research on the Fire" - Colorado State University 4:45 Depart 6:00 Arrive Ft. Collins Marriott 2 3 Navigator’s Narrative Tim Wheeler Between the Fall River Visitors Center and the Lawn Lake Alluvial Debris Fan: This Park, or open grassy area, is called Horseshoe Park and is the tail end of the Park’s largest valley glacier.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Small Vessel General Permit
    ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PUBLIC NOTICE The United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois has requested a determination from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources if their Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) are consistent with the enforceable policies of the Illinois Coastal Management Program (ICMP). VGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non-recreational vessels greater than or equal to 79 ft. in length. sVGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non- recreational vessels less than 79 ft. in length. VGP and sVGP can be viewed in their entirety at the ICMP web site http://www.dnr.illinois.gov/cmp/Pages/CMPFederalConsistencyRegister.aspx Inquiries concerning this request may be directed to Jim Casey of the Department’s Chicago Office at (312) 793-5947 or [email protected]. You are invited to send written comments regarding this consistency request to the Michael A. Bilandic Building, 160 N. LaSalle Street, Suite S-703, Chicago, Illinois 60601. All comments claiming the proposed actions would not meet federal consistency must cite the state law or laws and how they would be violated. All comments must be received by July 19, 2012. Proposed Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) SMALL VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS LESS THAN 79 FEET (sVGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended (33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Names
    GEOGRAPHIC NAMES CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES ? REVISED TO JANUARY, 1911 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1911 PREPARED FOR USE IN THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE BY THE UNITED STATES GEOGRAPHIC BOARD WASHINGTON, D. C, JANUARY, 1911 ) CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES. The following list of geographic names includes all decisions on spelling rendered by the United States Geographic Board to and including December 7, 1910. Adopted forms are shown by bold-face type, rejected forms by italic, and revisions of previous decisions by an asterisk (*). Aalplaus ; see Alplaus. Acoma; township, McLeod County, Minn. Abagadasset; point, Kennebec River, Saga- (Not Aconia.) dahoc County, Me. (Not Abagadusset. AQores ; see Azores. Abatan; river, southwest part of Bohol, Acquasco; see Aquaseo. discharging into Maribojoc Bay. (Not Acquia; see Aquia. Abalan nor Abalon.) Acworth; railroad station and town, Cobb Aberjona; river, IVIiddlesex County, Mass. County, Ga. (Not Ackworth.) (Not Abbajona.) Adam; island, Chesapeake Bay, Dorchester Abino; point, in Canada, near east end of County, Md. (Not Adam's nor Adams.) Lake Erie. (Not Abineau nor Albino.) Adams; creek, Chatham County, Ga. (Not Aboite; railroad station, Allen County, Adams's.) Ind. (Not Aboit.) Adams; township. Warren County, Ind. AJjoo-shehr ; see Bushire. (Not J. Q. Adams.) Abookeer; AhouJcir; see Abukir. Adam's Creek; see Cunningham. Ahou Hamad; see Abu Hamed. Adams Fall; ledge in New Haven Harbor, Fall.) Abram ; creek in Grant and Mineral Coun- Conn. (Not Adam's ties, W. Va. (Not Abraham.) Adel; see Somali. Abram; see Shimmo. Adelina; town, Calvert County, Md. (Not Abruad ; see Riad. Adalina.) Absaroka; range of mountains in and near Aderhold; ferry over Chattahoochee River, Yellowstone National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
    Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,770 83 25,853 Alabama Totals 42,218 83 42,301 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,876 520 75,396 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,118 0 19,118 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,917 7 39,924 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 979,079 21,741 1,000,820 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,183 15 60,198 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,814 0 4,814 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,144,010 235 2,144,245 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 46,758 0 46,758 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,083 41 23,124 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 348,626 63 348,689 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 315,833 0 315,833 South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,593 834 83,427 Refresh Date: 10/14/2017
    [Show full text]