Decompression' Sickness: Building Understanding

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Decompression' Sickness: Building Understanding L -* 5 Faceplate lO(2): 11-13, 79 ’ DECOMPRESSION’ SICKNESS: BUILDING AN UNDERSTANDING Paul K. Weathersby, Ph. D. Lieutenant, MSC, USN Naval Medical Research Institute A NMRI researcher discusses the kind of reasoning that has been used to design decompression schedules, and presents his own view of how well the various theoretical concepts agree with proven events in a diver’s body. ivers are well acquainted with the U.S. Navy de- D-compression tables. How these tables developed n n. and how their development compares with the reasoning behind decompression tablcs of other navies and private organizations is not as widely known. Decompression sickness (DCS) is a rare example of human diseisz in that prevention of the disease can be approached by the use of involved theoretical calcula- tions. The theoretician follows several steps: First, he decides on the cause of the disease; he then breaks down the cause of the disease into aspects that can be solved separately; finally, he reassembles these partial solutions into a complete package that can dcscribe the entire disease process and its prevention. Decompression calculation proccdures are thus de- veloped from particular sets of ideas about events in the body that may cause the variety of DCS symptoms. Each set of ideas, whether based on fact, assumption, or guess, is known as a “decompression theory.” Search for the DCS Villain Possible causes of DCS, proposed within the last cen- tury, are listed in Table 1. When workers became stricken with DCS, or “the bends,” during the caisson construc- tion of the St. Louis bridge in the 1870s, some doctors concluded that diver exhaustion was to blame. But simple physical exhaustion has failed to answer most of the questions raised by DCS, although exercise while under pressurc still appears to contribute to it. Pneumatic caissons were used widely in the Iote 19th century to construct bridge pilings. Work spaces were filled with com- pressed oir to prevent wotrr seepage. Upon returning to the sur- face, ho wver, workers uere often slricken with decompression sickness. Doctors collrd it “caisson sickriess“ ond orlributed it to physic01 exhoustion. Todoy, gos bubble theories prrdominate, but reseorchers disogree on [Ire precise proccss through which tlie gas leads to DCS. FACEPLATE 11 REPOSITORY l.L.L&U&M 6OXNo.IRB f ~~~~~~ Institutional Review BoapdLDE, P. IRM No. 80P-109 COLLECTION rnccinn Cirknp<< Uusli es if9 Raqiogcjjive Gases Pn ny1 n -- ‘I . most ‘practical’ diving experience does not contribute to our understanding of which (decompression sickness) theories work better than others.” More recently, several groups of diving researchers tissues. Gas transport is frequently described from two have based the prevention and treatment of DCS on simplified viewpoints, the blood perfusion model and drugs and on procedures that affect blood cells, blood the tissue diffusion model. The more common blood vessel walls, or the movement of fluids among various perfusion model states that gas transport is limited by spaces in the body. These researchers could be said to rate of local blood flow because the gas molecules can follow a biologicul approach to DCS prevention. exchange very quickly between small blood capillaries Today, most researchers follow a physical approach and the tissue spaces near them. The tissue diffusion to DCS; that is, they believe that DCS occurs after the model states that blood can supply or remove gas quick- physical process of gas formation in the body. Accord- ly, so that the process of diffusion of gas molecules ing to this belief, DCS can be avoided if the formation between or into tissue cells limits the overall rate of gas and growth of gas bubbles is avoided or, at least, mini- exchange. Evidence from laboratory experiments has not mized. Furthermore, this school of thought attributes yet resolved which simplified approach applies to human the changes in blood cells, body fluids, and blood diving. The final answer may lie between these two ex- vessels to biochemical events that occur only after tremes; already, several theories contain mixtures of the bubbles appear. perfusion and diffusion elements. Emphasis on the gas bubble as primary villain in DCS Symptom-Provoking Events. The second element of has encouraged researchers who are mathematically any gas bubble theory requires that a decision be made inclined to try to solve DCS problems without worrying on what makes bubbles “bad.” For much of this century, about the complicated biological processes that underlie attention was focused on the idea of bubble formation. the disease (which is the usual mode of operation in The tactic in decompression schedule calculation was to medical research). The processcs that describe how gases avoid a critical ratio of inert gas supersaturation (that move through liquids and how bubbles form and grow in is, the ratio of the dissolved gas partial pressure in the supersaturated liquids are fairly well understood. At body to the hydrostatic pressure at the diver’s particular least in simple physical situations, these processes can be depth). This consideration was presumed to prevent described with precise mathematical expressions. bubble formation, and it is the basis for the present U. S. Navy tables. In recent years, however, evidence has accu- Elements of Gas Bubble Theory mulated that during many dives, divers’ bodies contained Elements to be considered when one evaluates DCS gas bubbles without the divers noticing any DCS symp- bubble theories are detailed in Table 2. The major ele- toms. Therefore, several theories allow for the formation ments to be addressed are (1) the rate ofgus exchange of bubbles but try to prevent the bubbles from growing (Le., at what rates and in which locations does gas move to a certain critical size, or deforming certain tissue in the body during a dive?), and (2) the symptom- structures, or exceeding a certain number. provoking event(s) (i.e., what property of the gas bubble(s) causes DCS symptoms?). Why So Many Bubble Theories? Rate of Gas Exchange. Gas exchange rates probably Gas theories for calculating decompression tables are depend, in a rather complicated way, on the properties shown in Table 3. At the risk of oversimplification, I of gas molecules as well as on the properties of body have listed for each theory (1) the number of “tissues” TABLE 1 TABLE 2 POSSIBLE CAUSES OF DECOMPRESSION SICKNESS - - ELEMENTS OF GAS BUBBLE THEORY ABOUT DECOMPRESSION SICKNESS 1. Exhaustion 1. Rate of gas exchange: Blood perfusion 2. Blood cell aggregationlclotting Diffusion through tissue 3. Fluid shifts Statistical 2. Symptom-provoking event(s): 4. Chemical changes in blood vessels Initial formation of bubble 5. Gas bubbles Growth to critical size Biology following appearance Location le FACEPLATE . ... ... - .. I -- TABLE 3 DECOMPRESSION TABLES CALCULATED BY DIFFERENT GAS BUBBLE THEORIES Source 4cTissues” Gus Rate Bubble Event Haldane (1908) 5 Perfusion Formation US Navy - 6-9 Perfusion Formation (Workman, 1956) -.- Royal Navy 1 Diffusion Formation (Hempleman, 1967) Swiss 6 PerfIDiff Formation (Buhlmann, 1969) -- “Thermodynamic” 2 Diffusion Growth (Hills, 1966) Hawaii 1 Perf/Diff Number (Yount, 1978) (mathematically distinct sets of gas exchange rates); Commanders Edward Flynn and Kristopher Greene are (2) the procedtire foi calculating rates deperiding upon’ preparing to measure gas exchange in divers performing the choice of blood perfusion or tissue diffusion models, at different levels of exercise. Dr. Louis Homer is devel- or a combination of both; and (3) the choice of bubble oping the mathematical formulations necessary to corn- event that leads to DCS. Obviously, theories are avail- pare special combinations of perfusion and diffusion gas able to cover most of the possible combinations. exchange conditions with careful animal and human The reasons for having a wide selection of gas bubble measurements. My colleagues and I are measuring gas theories of DCS are simple: Very little experimental in- exchange over prolonged periods in many tissues of formation is available for deciding which set of assump- animals, and we have developed a statistical description tions matches the events occurring in a diver’s body. The of gas exchange rates that avoids choosing between per- gaps in our knowledge exist for many reasons. The fusion and diffusion assumptions. perfusion-diffusion controversy still rages despite evi- dence that both assumptions are incorrect. We still do Conclusions not have methods to detect or mcasure sizes of bubbles Decompression theories are not scientific theories in most parts of the body. In addition, pain, the most in the sense of the law of gravity; rather, they are common symptom of DCS, is difficult to describe bio- mathematical predictions based on unverified logically, much less mathematically. Finally, in spite of assumptions. the inherently low incidence of DCS during thousands Decompression theories do provide calculation of dives using common decompression schcdules, we methods for summarizing the experience of divers; cannot eliminate the possibility that chance alone may they also provide starting values for developing account for the diffcrcnces in safety reported in dives new schedules. using diffcrent dccompression tables. Thus, most “prac- Theoretical calculations of new decompression tical” diving expericncc docs not contribute to our schedules usually cannot be accepted immediately; understandingof which thcorics work better than othcrs. they are rcviscd to provide adequate safety. Several projects at thc Naval Medical Research Insti- It remains for researchers to establish how fast and tutc arc ainicd at plugging thcsc gaps in our knowlcdgc. where gas exchange occurs and the specific pro- Comtnandcr John Hailenbcck has becn ablc to follow I ccsscs through which the gas leads to DCS.@ thc progression of biological evcnts in spinal cord DCS that occurs aftcr bubblcs bccomc visible. Comniandcr Thomas Berghage has amascd a large body of informa- 7he author is gratefiif to his colleagues at the h’aval Medical tion on thc procedurcs that lcad to serious symptoms of Research Institute, especial& to Surgeon Captain E E.
Recommended publications
  • Full Paper/Talk Deep Stops and Shallow Stops – Fact and Fancy
    Full Paper/Talk Deep Stops and Shallow Stops – Fact and Fancy B.R. Wienke1 and T.R. O’Leary2 1 C&C Dive Team Ldr, Program Manager Computational Physics, LANL, MS D490, Los Alamos, NM 87545 [email protected] 2 Director, NAUI Technical Diving Operations, 33256 State Rd 100, South Padre Island, TX, 78597 Abstract The question of deep stops and shallow stops is interesting and fraught with controversy in diving circles and operations, training, exploration and scientific endeavors. Plus frought with some misunderstanding which is understandable as the issues are complex. We therefore attempt a short history of deep and shallow stops, physical aspects, staging differences, diving tests, models with data correlations and data banks with user statistics and DCS outcomes as diver amplification. Pros and cons of both deep stop and shallow stop staging are presented. Misfacts are righted when appropriate. Chamber, wet and Doppler tests are contrasted. A compendium of Training Agency Standards regarding deep and shallow stops is included. Dive software is also detailed. Some commercial diving operations are discussed. A short tabulation of dive computer and software algorithms is given. From diving data, tests, DCS outcomes and field usage, we conclude that both deep stops and shallow stops are safely employed in recreational and technical diving. That is a good thing but choose your deco wisely and know why. Keywords: computational models, decompression staging, profile data, risk, statistical correlations, tests Acronyms and Nomenclature ANDI: Association of Nitrox Diving Instructors. BM: bubble phase model dividing the body into tissue compartments with halftimes that are coupled to inert gas diffusion across bubble film surfaces of exponential size distribution constrained in cumulative growth by a volume limit point.
    [Show full text]
  • Observation of Elliptically Polarized Light from Total Internal Reflection in Bubbles
    Observation of elliptically polarized light from total internal reflection in bubbles Item Type Article Authors Miller, Sawyer; Ding, Yitian; Jiang, Linan; Tu, Xingzhou; Pau, Stanley Citation Miller, S., Ding, Y., Jiang, L. et al. Observation of elliptically polarized light from total internal reflection in bubbles. Sci Rep 10, 8725 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65410-5 DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-65410-5 Publisher NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP Journal SCIENTIFIC REPORTS Rights Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Download date 29/09/2021 02:08:57 Item License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/641865 www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Observation of elliptically polarized light from total internal refection in bubbles Sawyer Miller1,2 ✉ , Yitian Ding1,2, Linan Jiang1, Xingzhou Tu1 & Stanley Pau1 ✉ Bubbles are ubiquitous in the natural environment, where diferent substances and phases of the same substance forms globules due to diferences in pressure and surface tension. Total internal refection occurs at the interface of a bubble, where light travels from the higher refractive index material outside a bubble to the lower index material inside a bubble at appropriate angles of incidence, which can lead to a phase shift in the refected light. Linearly polarized skylight can be converted to elliptically polarized light with efciency up to 53% by single scattering from the water-air interface. Total internal refection from air bubble in water is one of the few sources of elliptical polarization in the natural world.
    [Show full text]
  • Deadly Acute Decompression Sickness in Risso's Dolphins
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Deadly acute Decompression Sickness in Risso’s dolphins A. Fernández, E. Sierra, J. Díaz-Delgado, S. Sacchini , Y. Sánchez-Paz, C. Suárez-Santana, M. Arregui, M. Arbelo & Y. Bernaldo de Quirós Received: 19 April 2017 Diving air-breathing vertebrates have long been considered protected against decompression sickness Accepted: 5 October 2017 (DCS) through anatomical, physiological, and behavioural adaptations. However, an acute systemic gas Published: xx xx xxxx and fat embolic syndrome similar to DCS in human divers was described in beaked whales that stranded in temporal and spatial association with military exercises involving high-powered sonar. More recently, DCS has been diagnosed in bycaught sea turtles. Both cases were linked to human activities. Two Risso’s dolphin (Grampus griseus) out of 493 necropsied cetaceans stranded in the Canary Islands in a 16-year period (2000–2015), had a severe acute decompression sickness supported by pathological fndings and gas analysis. Deadly systemic, infammatory, infectious, or neoplastic diseases, ship collision, military sonar, fsheries interaction or other type of lethal inducing associated trauma were ruled out. Struggling with a squid during hunting is discussed as the most likely cause of DCS. Pathologies related to efects of changes in pressure are well known among human divers. Decompression sick- ness (DCS) is a syndrome related to the formation of gas bubbles in blood and/or tissues when the sum of the dissolved gas tensions exceeds the local absolute pressure. Gas bubbles may have biochemical efects and disrupt the tissues or occlude the vessels with clinical and pathological signs and, in certain cases, death1.
    [Show full text]
  • Dive Theory Guide
    DIVE THEORY STUDY GUIDE by Rod Abbotson CD69259 © 2010 Dive Aqaba Guidelines for studying: Study each area in order as the theory from one subject is used to build upon the theory in the next subject. When you have completed a subject, take tests and exams in that subject to make sure you understand everything before moving on. If you try to jump around or don’t completely understand something; this can lead to gaps in your knowledge. You need to apply the knowledge in earlier sections to understand the concepts in later sections... If you study this way you will retain all of the information and you will have no problems with any PADI dive theory exams you may take in the future. Before completing the section on decompression theory and the RDP make sure you are thoroughly familiar with the RDP, both Wheel and table versions. Use the appropriate instructions for use guides which come with the product. Contents Section One PHYSICS ………………………………………………page 2 Section Two PHYSIOLOGY………………………………………….page 11 Section Three DECOMPRESSION THEORY & THE RDP….……..page 21 Section Four EQUIPMENT……………………………………………page 27 Section Five SKILLS & ENVIRONMENT…………………………...page 36 PHYSICS SECTION ONE Light: The speed of light changes as it passes through different things such as air, glass and water. This affects the way we see things underwater with a diving mask. As the light passes through the glass of the mask and the air space, the difference in speed causes the light rays to bend; this is called refraction. To the diver wearing a normal diving mask objects appear to be larger and closer than they actually are.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomechanics of Safe Ascents Workshop
    PROCEEDINGS OF BIOMECHANICS OF SAFE ASCENTS WORKSHOP — 10 ft E 30 ft TIME AMERICAN ACADEMY OF UNDERWATER SCIENCES September 25 - 27, 1989 Woods Hole, Massachusetts Proceedings of the AAUS Biomechanics of Safe Ascents Workshop Michael A. Lang and Glen H. Egstrom, (Editors) Copyright © 1990 by AMERICAN ACADEMY OF UNDERWATER SCIENCES 947 Newhall Street Costa Mesa, CA 92627 All Rights Reserved No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by photostat, microfilm, or any other means, without written permission from the publishers Copies of these Proceedings can be purchased from AAUS at the above address This workshop was sponsored in part by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce, under grant number 40AANR902932, through the Office of Undersea Research, and in part by the Diving Equipment Manufacturers Association (DEMA), and in part by the American Academy of Underwater Sciences (AAUS). The U.S. Government is authorized to produce and distribute reprints for governmental purposes notwithstanding the copyright notation that appears above. Opinions presented at the Workshop and in the Proceedings are those of the contributors, and do not necessarily reflect those of the American Academy of Underwater Sciences PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF UNDERWATER SCIENCES BIOMECHANICS OF SAFE ASCENTS WORKSHOP WHOI/MBL Woods Hole, Massachusetts September 25 - 27, 1989 MICHAEL A. LANG GLEN H. EGSTROM Editors American Academy of Underwater Sciences 947 Newhall Street, Costa Mesa, California 92627 U.S.A. An American Academy of Underwater Sciences Diving Safety Publication AAUSDSP-BSA-01-90 CONTENTS Preface i About AAUS ii Executive Summary iii Acknowledgments v Session 1: Introductory Session Welcoming address - Michael A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Monte Carlo Ray Tracing Study of Polarized Light Propagation in Liquid Foams
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer 104 (2007) 277–287 www.elsevier.com/locate/jqsrt A Monte Carlo ray tracing study of polarized light propagation in liquid foams J.N. Swamya,Ã, Czarena Crofchecka, M. Pinar Mengu¨c- b,ÃÃ aDepartment of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, 128 C E Barnhart Building, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USA bDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, 269 Ralph G. Anderson Building, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA Received 10 July 2006; accepted 28 July 2006 Abstract A Monte Carlo ray tracing scheme is used to investigate the propagation of an incident collimated beam of polarized light in liquid foams. Cellular structures like foam are expected to change the polarization characteristics due to multiple scattering events, where such changes can be used to monitor foam dynamics. A statistical model utilizing some of the recent developments in foam physics is coupled with a vector Monte Carlo scheme to compute the depolarization ratios via Stokes–Mueller formalism. For the simulations, the incident Stokes vector corresponding to horizontal linear polarization and right circular polarization are considered. It is observed that bubble size and the polydispersity parameter have a significant effect on the depolarization ratios. This is partially owing to the number of total internal reflection events in the Plateau borders. The results are discussed in terms of applicability of polarized light as a diagnostic tool for monitoring foams. r 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Polarized light scattering; Liquid foams; Bubble size; Polydispersity; Foam characterization; Foam diagnostics; Cellular structures 1. Introduction Liquid foams are random packing of bubbles in a small amount of immiscible liquid [1] and can be found in a wide variety of applications.
    [Show full text]
  • The Synergistic Effect of Focused Ultrasound and Biophotonics to Overcome the Barrier of Light Transmittance in Biological Tissue
    Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy 33 (2021) 102173 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pdpdt The synergistic effect of focused ultrasound and biophotonics to overcome the barrier of light transmittance in biological tissue Jaehyuk Kim a,b, Jaewoo Shin c, Chanho Kong c, Sung-Ho Lee a, Won Seok Chang c, Seung Hee Han a,d,* a Molecular Imaging, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada b Health and Medical Equipment, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Suwon, Republic of Korea c Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea d Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Optical technology is a tool to diagnose and treat human diseases. Shallow penetration depth caused by the high Light transmission enhancement optical scattering nature of biological tissues is a significantobstacle to utilizing light in the biomedical field. In Focused Ultrasound this paper, light transmission enhancement in the rat brain induced by focused ultrasound (FUS) was observed Air bubble and the cause of observed enhancement was analyzed. Both air bubbles and mechanical deformation generated Mechanical deformation by FUS were cited as the cause. The Monte Carlo simulation was performed to investigate effects on transmission Rat brain by air bubbles and finiteelement method was also used to describe mechanical deformation induced by motions of acoustic particles. As a result, it was found that the mechanical deformation was more suitable to describe the transmission change according to the FUS pulse observed in the experiment. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Storage
    277 6 Ocean storage Coordinating Lead Authors Ken Caldeira (United States), Makoto Akai (Japan) Lead Authors Peter Brewer (United States), Baixin Chen (China), Peter Haugan (Norway), Toru Iwama (Japan), Paul Johnston (United Kingdom), Haroon Kheshgi (United States), Qingquan Li (China), Takashi Ohsumi (Japan), Hans Pörtner (Germany), Chris Sabine (United States), Yoshihisa Shirayama (Japan), Jolyon Thomson (United Kingdom) Contributing Authors Jim Barry (United States), Lara Hansen (United States) Review Editors Brad De Young (Canada), Fortunat Joos (Switzerland) 278 IPCC Special Report on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 279 6.7 Environmental impacts, risks, and risk management 298 6.1 Introduction and background 279 6.7.1 Introduction to biological impacts and risk 298 6.1.1 Intentional storage of CO2 in the ocean 279 6.7.2 Physiological effects of CO2 301 6.1.2 Relevant background in physical and chemical 6.7.3 From physiological mechanisms to ecosystems 305 oceanography 281 6.7.4 Biological consequences for water column release scenarios 306 6.2 Approaches to release CO2 into the ocean 282 6.7.5 Biological consequences associated with CO2 6.2.1 Approaches to releasing CO2 that has been captured, lakes 307 compressed, and transported into the ocean 282 6.7.6 Contaminants in CO2 streams 307 6.2.2 CO2 storage by dissolution of carbonate minerals 290 6.7.7 Risk management 307 6.2.3 Other ocean storage approaches 291 6.7.8 Social aspects; public and stakeholder perception 307 6.3 Capacity and fractions retained
    [Show full text]
  • Bubble-Mania the Bubbling Clues to Magma Viscosity and Eruptions
    Earthlearningidea - http://www.earthlearningidea.com/ Bubble-mania The bubbling clues to magma viscosity and eruptions Pour a viscous liquid (eg. honey, syrup) into Honey and a one transparent container and a pale-coloured soft drink – ready for soft drink (eg. ginger beer) or just coloured bubble-mania. water into another. Put both of these onto a plastic tray or table. Ask your pupils to use a drinking straw to blow bubbles into the soft Apparatus photo: drink, then ask them to ‘use the same blow’ to Chris King blow bubbles in the more viscous liquid. When nothing happens, ask them to blow harder until the liquid ‘erupts’. Ask: • How were the ‘eruptions’ different? • How were the bubbles different? • What caused the differences? • Some volcanoes have magmas that are Magma fountain ‘runny’ (like the soft drink) and some have within the crater much more viscous magmas (like the other of Volcan liquid) – how might these volcanoes erupt Villarrica, Pucón, differently? Chile. • Which sort of eruption would you most like to This file is see – one with low viscosity (runny) magma, licensed by Jonathan Lewis like the soft drink, or one with high viscosity under the Creative (thick) magma like the viscous liquid? Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… The back up Title: Bubble-mania • How were the ‘eruptions’ different? It was easy to blow bubbles into the soft drink Subtitle: The bubbling clues to magma viscosity and it ‘fizzed’ a bit, but the bubbles soon and eruptions disappeared; it was much harder to blow bubbles into the viscous liquid and they grew Topic: A simple test of the viscosity of two similar- large and sometimes burst out of the container looking liquids, linked to volcanic eruption style.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life of a Surface Bubble
    molecules Review The Life of a Surface Bubble Jonas Miguet 1,†, Florence Rouyer 2,† and Emmanuelle Rio 3,*,† 1 TIPS C.P.165/67, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Av. F. Roosevelt 50, 1050 Brussels, Belgium; [email protected] 2 Laboratoire Navier, Université Gustave Eiffel, Ecole des Ponts, CNRS, 77454 Marne-la-Vallée, France; fl[email protected] 3 Laboratoire de Physique des Solides, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405 Orsay, France * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-1691-569-60 † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Surface bubbles are present in many industrial processes and in nature, as well as in carbon- ated beverages. They have motivated many theoretical, numerical and experimental works. This paper presents the current knowledge on the physics of surface bubbles lifetime and shows the diversity of mechanisms at play that depend on the properties of the bath, the interfaces and the ambient air. In particular, we explore the role of drainage and evaporation on film thinning. We highlight the existence of two different scenarios depending on whether the cap film ruptures at large or small thickness compared to the thickness at which van der Waals interaction come in to play. Keywords: bubble; film; drainage; evaporation; lifetime 1. Introduction Bubbles have attracted much attention in the past for several reasons. First, their ephemeral Citation: Miguet, J.; Rouyer, F.; nature commonly awakes children’s interest and amusement. Their visual appeal has raised Rio, E. The Life of a Surface Bubble. interest in painting [1], in graphism [2] or in living art.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Objectives for a Diving Medical Physician
    The Diving Medical Advisory Committee Training Objectives for a Diving Medicine Physician This guidance includes all the training objectives agreed by the Diving Medical Advisory Committee, the European Diving Technology Committee and the European Committee for Hyperbaric Medicine in 2011. Rev 1 - 2013 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this document is to define more closely the training objectives in diving physiology and medicine that need to be met by doctors already fully accredited or board-certified in a clinical speciality to national standards. It is based on topic headings that were originally prepared for a working group of European Diving Technology Committee (EDTC) and the European Committee of Hyperbaric Medicine (ECHM) as a guide for diving medicine some 20 years ago by J.Desola (Spain), T.Nome (Norway) & D.H.Elliott (U.K.). The training now required for medical examiners of working divers and for specialist diving medicine physicians was based on a EDTC/ECHM standard 1999 and subsequently has been enhanced by the Diving Medical Advisory Committee (DMAC), revised and agreed in principle by DMAC, EDTC and ECHM in 2010 and then ratified by EDTC and ECHM in 2011. The requirements now relate to an assessment of competence, the need for some training in occupational medicine, the need for maintenance of those skills by individual ‘refresher training’. Formal recognition of all this includes the need to involve a national authority for medical education. These objectives have been applied internationally to doctors who provide medical support to working divers. (Most recreational instructors and dive guides are, by their employment, working divers and so the guidance includes the relevant aspects of recreational diving.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Bubble Cavitation in Liquids for Bubbles Arranged in a Columnar Bubble Group
    applied sciences Article Study on Bubble Cavitation in Liquids for Bubbles Arranged in a Columnar Bubble Group Peng-li Zhang 1,2 and Shu-yu Lin 1,* 1 Institute of Applied Acoustics, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062, China; [email protected] 2 College of Science, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-181-9273-7031 Received: 24 October 2019; Accepted: 29 November 2019; Published: 4 December 2019 Featured Application: This work will provide a reference for further simulations and help to promote the theoretical study of ultrasonic cavitation bubbles. Abstract: In liquids, bubbles usually exist in the form of bubble groups. Due to their interaction with other bubbles, the resonance frequency of bubbles decreases. In this paper, the resonance frequency of bubbles in a columnar bubble group is obtained by linear simplification of the bubbles’ dynamic equation. The correction coefficient between the resonance frequency of the bubbles in the columnar bubble group and the Minnaert frequency of a single bubble is given. The results show that the resonance frequency of bubbles in the bubble group is affected by many parameters such as the initial radius of bubbles, the number of bubbles in the bubble group, and the distance between bubbles. The initial radius of the bubbles and the distance between bubbles are found to have more significant influence on the resonance frequency of the bubbles. When the distance between bubbles increases to 20 times the bubbles’ initial radius, the coupling effect between bubbles can be ignored, and after that the bubbles’ resonance frequency in the bubble group tends to the resonance frequency of a single bubble’s resonance frequency.
    [Show full text]