Proquest Dissertations
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Wallace Nethery Papers
http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt9v19s0q2 No online items Finding Aid for the Wallace Nethery Papers 1931-2000 Processed by Jamie Henricks. William Andrews Clark Memorial Library University of California, Los Angeles 2520 Cimarron Street Los Angeles, CA 90018 Phone: (323) 731-8529 Fax: (323) 731-8617 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.humnet.ucla.edu/humnet/clarklib/ ©2009 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Finding Aid for the Wallace MS.2007.017 1 Nethery Papers 1931-2000 Descriptive Summary Title: Wallace Nethery Papers, Date (inclusive): 1931-2000 Collection number: MS.2007.017 Creator: Nethery, Wallace 1910-1996 Extent: 4 boxes (1.5 linear feet) Repository: University of California, Los Angeles. Library. William Andrews Clark Memorial Library Los Angeles, California 90095-1490 Abstract: This collection contains material created and collected by Wallace and Corry Nethery. Correspondence, drafts, research notes, and ephemera are included for a number of Nethery's books. Materials related to Nethery's work as a librarian at the University of Southern California are included as well. Photocopies of letters to, from, and about Elisabeth Jungmann are numerous. The subject matter for most of the books and papers relate to Max Beerbohm, Charles and Mary Lamb, Elisabeth Jungmann, and miniature books. Materials are in English, German, and Dutch. Physical location: This collection is stored at the Southern Regional Library Facility. Please contact Clark Library staff at least 2 weeks in advance if you would like to view the materials in this collection. Language of Material: Collection materials in English Access Collection is open for research. -
Theater Souvenir Programs Guide [1881-1979]
Theater Souvenir Programs Guide [1881-1979] RBC PN2037 .T54 1881 Choose which boxes you want to see, go to SearchWorks record, and page boxes electronically. BOX 1 1: An Illustrated Record by "The Sphere" of the Gilbert & Sullivan Operas 1939 (1939). Note: Operas: The Mikado; The Goldoliers; Iolanthe; Trial by Jury; The Pirates of Penzance; The Yeomen of the Guard; Patience; Princess Ida; Ruddigore; H.M.S. Pinafore; The Grand Duke; Utopia, Limited; The Sorcerer. 2: Glyndebourne Festival Opera (1960). Note: 26th Anniversary of the Glyndebourne Festival, operas: I Puritani; Falstaff; Der Rosenkavalier; Don Giovanni; La Cenerentola; Die Zauberflöte. 3: Parts I Have Played: Mr. Martin Harvey (1881-1909). Note: 30 Photographs and A Biographical Sketch. 4: Souvenir of The Christian King (Or Alfred of "Engle-Land"), by Wilson Barrett. Note: Photographs by W. & D. Downey. 5: Adelphi Theatre : Adelphi Theatre Souvenir of the 200th Performance of "Tina" (1916). 6: Comedy Theatre : Souvenir of "Sunday" (1904), by Thomas Raceward. 7: Daly's Theatre : The Lady of the Rose: Souvenir of Anniversary Perforamnce Feb. 21, 1923 (1923), by Frederick Lonsdale. Note: Musical theater. 8: Drury Lane Theatre : The Pageant of Drury Lane Theatre (1918), by Louis N. Parker. Note: In celebration of the 21 years of management by Arthur Collins. 9: Duke of York's Theatre : Souvenir of the 200th Performance of "The Admirable Crichton" (1902), by J.M. Barrie. Note: Oil paintings by Chas. A. Buchel, produced under the management of Charles Frohman. 10: Gaiety Theatre : The Orchid (1904), by James T. Tanner. Note: Managing Director, Mr. George Edwardes, musical comedy. -
MAX BEERBOHM AS a LITERARY CRITIC by BEVERLY JOAN
MAX BEERBOHM AS A LITERARY CRITIC by BEVERLY JOAN NORBY B.A., University of British Columbia, 1949 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of English We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA October, 1967 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and Study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by h.i>s representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of ENGLISH The University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada Date October, 1967 ABSTRACT The purpose of this thesis has been to define Max Beerbohm's critical literary principles, to evaluate his con• tribution to aesthetic criticism and thereby to determine his place in the critical tradition. The methods of investi• gation have been: to study the formative influences on the development of his critical principles and to evaluate the results of their application in Max's essays and dramatic criticisms. From this study it is evident that as a man and as an artist Max was "formed" during the Eighteen-nineties. By nature he was an intellectual dandy who always preferred strong, narrow creative personalities like himself. He was detached, fastidious, witty, and humane, and he was noted for his wisdom and sound common sense, even as a very young man. -
A Lively Theatre There's a Revolution Afoot in Theatre Design, Believes
A LIVELY THEatRE There’s a revolution afoot in theatre design, believes architectural consultant RICHARD PILBROW, that takes its cue from the three-dimensional spaces of centuries past The 20th century has not been a good time for theatre architecture. In the years from the 1920s to the 1970s, the world became littered with overlarge, often fan-shaped auditoriums that are barren in feeling and lacking in intimacy--places that are seldom conducive to that interplay between actor and audience that lies at the heart of the theatre experience. Why do theatres of the 19th century feel so much more “theatrical”? And why do so many actors and audiences prefer the old to the new? More generally, does theatre architecture really matter? There are some that believe that as soon as the house lights dim, the audience only needs to see and hear what happens on the stage. Perhaps audiences don’t hiss, boo and shout during a performance any more, but most actors and directors know that an audience’s reaction critically affects the performance. The nature of the theatre space, the configuration of the audience and the intimacy engendered by the form of the auditorium can powerfully assist in the formation of that reaction. A theatre auditorium may be a dead space or a lively one. Theatres designed like cinemas or lecture halls can lay a dead hand on the theatre experience. Happily, the past 20 years have seen a revolution in attitude to theatre design. No longer is a theatre only a place for listening or viewing. -
Enoch Soames Max Beerbohm
Enoch Soames Max Beerbohm El tema del diablo ha dado origen a innumerables leyendas e invenciones. Pocas tan afortunadas como ésta de Max Beerbohm, ensayista y caricaturista inglés, nacido en Londres en 1872 y muerto en Rapallo en 1956, educado en Oxford, sucesor de Bernard Shaw como crítico literario de la Saturday Review, autor de: A defense of cosmetics (1896), The happy hypocrite (1897), More (1899), Zuleika Dobson (1911), Seven men (1919), And even now (1920). Uno de los resortes más eficaces de Enoch Soames es el fondo de realidad contra el que se mueven los protagonistas. Existió el Café Royal, existieron Rothenstein y The Yellow Book (y desde luego Whistler y Beardsley), existió ese Londres finisecular con su atmósfera casi parisiense, Chesterton nos asegura que existe el príncipe de las tinieblas, y en cuanto a Enoch Soames sólo en el futuro se dijo (se dirá) que nunca llegó a existir. Cuando el señor Holbrook Jackson dio al mundo un libro sobre la literatura del 90, busqué ansiosamente en el índice el nombre de Soames, Enoch. Temía que no estuviese. Y no estaba. Sin embargo, figuraban todos los demás. Muchos escritores a quienes yo olvidara por completo o sólo recordaba vagamente, resucitaron ante mí, con sus obras, en las páginas del señor Holbrook Jackson. El libro era tan minucioso como brillante. De ahí que la omisión descubierta por mí fuese la evidencia más cabal de que el pobre Soames no había dejado huella alguna en la literatura de su década. Creo que soy la única persona que lo notó... ¡tan lamentable había sido el fracaso de Soames! Y es inútil alegar que, si hubiera conquistado algún mediano éxito, quizá se habría esfumado de mi memoria, como los demás, para retornar tan sólo al llamado del historiador. -
The Return of Elizabeth: William Poel's Hamlet and the Dream Of
ঃਆઽࢂٷணপ࠙ 제16권 1호 (2008): 201-220 The Return of Elizabeth: William Poel’s Hamlet and the Dream of Empire Yeeyon Im (Yonsei University) 1. Translation and Authenticity There would be no dispute that few works of art have been ‘translated’ more widely than some plays in the Shakespeare canon. With a Shakespeare play, translation does not confine itself to language alone; its theatrical mode also undergoes a transformation when it is staged in a new cultural environment. Odd it may sound, Shakespeare has been translated even in England. It was Harley Granville-Barker who first emphasized the temporal distance between Shakespeare’s plays and the modern audience that needs to be translated: “The literature of the past is a foreign literature. We must either learn its language or suffer it to be translated”(7). Elizabethan plays “are like music written to be performed upon an 202 Yeeyon Im instrument now broken almost beyond repair”(9). Shakespeare’s plays, their putative universality notwithstanding, underwent changes and adaptations to suit the demands of different times. Shakespeare was ‘translated’ in terms of theatre as well. Anachronism was essential on the Elizabethan stage, which accommodated the fictional world of drama as well as the reality of the audience’s everyday life through presentation and representation. Elizabethan anachronism gave way to a more accurate representation of the dramatic world in the illusionist proscenium stage of the Victorian age. At present, modern directors are at liberty to ‘translate’ Shakespeare’s plays virtually in any period and style as they wish; it took an iconoclastic experimental spirit to break with the long‐standing Victorian tradition of archaeologically correct and pictorially spectacular staging. -
'Useless Art' Or 'Practical Protest': the Fin
‘Useless Art’ or ‘Practical Protest’: The Fin-de-Siècle Artist between Social Engagement and Artistic Detachment Author: Jutta Mackwell PhD The University of Edinburgh 2007 Abstract This thesis follows recent scholarly interest in the British fin de siècle, focussing on the artist and the notion of art within the context of capitalisation and rapidly changing social strata. It claims that the artist can be understood as a socially orientated rather than purely economically motivated player, who tries to position himself and his art within a distinctly transformed cultural landscape. It demonstrates how many texts and art works of the fin de siècle are permeated by a socio-critical and didactical discourse, which serves to legitimize the artist and his art work on the one hand, and aims at the aesthetic education of his audience on the other. This approach allows for a reconciliation of the paradoxical co- existence of socio-critical engagement and the concept of ‘art for art’s sake’ in fin-de-siècle art works. Chapter One, “Leaving the Ivory Tower,” provides a temporal framework for the discussion of the fin de siècle by tracing the development of the eighteenth-century, idealized notion of the artist through the writings of John Ruskin, Matthew Arnold and Walter Pater. It also gestures towards the connection of this tradition to Theodore Adorno’s understanding of ‘social art’. Examining Oscar Wilde’s “The Critic as Artist” within the context of this temporal trajectory, this chapter aims to establish an understanding of the paradoxical demands that face the artist in the light of capitalisation and the development of a mass readership at the end of the nineteenth century. -
Gesture and Movement in Silent Shakespeare Films
Gesticulated Shakespeare: Gesture and Movement in Silent Shakespeare Films Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Jennifer Rebecca Collins, B.A. Graduate Program in Theatre The Ohio State University 2011 Thesis Committee: Alan Woods, Advisor Janet Parrott Copyright by Jennifer Rebecca Collins 2011 Abstract The purpose of this study is to dissect the gesticulation used in the films made during the silent era that were adaptations of William Shakespeare's plays. In particular, this study investigates the use of nineteenth and twentieth century established gesture in the Shakespearean film adaptations from 1899-1922. The gestures described and illustrated by published gesture manuals are juxtaposed with at least one leading actor from each film. The research involves films from the experimental phase (1899-1907), the transitional phase (1908-1913), and the feature film phase (1912-1922). Specifically, the films are: King John (1899), Le Duel d'Hamlet (1900), La Diable et la Statue (1901), Duel Scene from Macbeth (1905), The Taming of the Shrew (1908), The Tempest (1908), A Midsummer Night's Dream (1909), Il Mercante di Venezia (1910), Re Lear (1910), Romeo Turns Bandit (1910), Twelfth Night (1910), A Winter's Tale (1910), Desdemona (1911), Richard III (1911), The Life and Death of King Richard III (1912), Romeo e Giulietta (1912), Cymbeline (1913), Hamlet (1913), King Lear (1916), Hamlet: Drama of Vengeance (1920), and Othello (1922). The gestures used by actors in the films are compared with Gilbert Austin's Chironomia or A Treatise on Rhetorical Delivery (1806), Henry Siddons' Practical Illustrations of Rhetorical Gesture and Action; Adapted to The English Drama: From a Work on the Subject by M. -
Culture and Fantastical Fiction 1843-1973 Paul Mcadam
Durham E-Theses Negotiating the real: Culture and fantastical ction 1843-1973 McAdam, Paul How to cite: McAdam, Paul (2005) Negotiating the real: Culture and fantastical ction 1843-1973, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/2864/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk McAdam 1 Abstract Paul McAdam Negotiating the Real: Culture and Fantastical Fiction 1843-1973 This dissertation examines the growth and practice of two distinct reading techniques, with reference to fantastical fiction from 1843 to 1973. While acknowledging that specific reading practices are not exclusive to particular groups or individuals, it is proposed, broadly, that readers fall into two categories: those who tend to be distanced from the text and approach it analytically; those who tend to embrace the text and immerse themselves in its narrative. -
Introduction the Fighting Nineties: the Age of the Critical Function
Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-10974-2 - Literature and the Politics of Post-Victorian Decadence Kristin Mahoney Excerpt More information Introduction The Fighting Nineties: The Age of the Critical Function In December 1928, the Leicester Galleries hosted an exhibition of the works of Max Beerbohm titled “Ghosts.” The exhibition included caricatures of Oscar Wilde, Lord Queensberry, John Lane, Walter Pater, Henry Harland, and Aubrey Beardsley. In the exhibition catalog, Beerbohm characteristi- cally apologizes for his own anachronism, feigning embarrassment at the irrelevance of his work to the modern moment. He lives in Italy now, he notes, and it’s very hard to keep up: “So very many people with faces and figures unknown to me have meanwhile become famous that I have abandoned all hope of being ‘topical.’”1 Nevertheless, he suggests that per- haps the visitors to the gallery won’t mind “looking at some people who flourished in past days.”2 He first addresses his fellow specters from the Victorian era: “Those of you who are as old as – or almost (and even that is saying much) as old as I – will perhaps like to have the chords of memory struck by the drawings on these walls.”3 But he continues to suggest that “eventheyoung...mayconceivablyfeelaslightthrill”whilecontemplat- ing the “ghosts” in the gallery.4 “I have noticed,” he writes, “that the young in this era have what those in my own era hadn’t: a not unfriendly interest in the more or less immediate past.”5 This “not unfriendly interest” in the late-Victorian period had been on the rise since the publication of Holbrook Jackson’s well-received The Eighteen-Nineties in 1913. -
Max Beerbohm Prints
Max Beerbohm Caricatures A Finding Aid to the Collection in the Helen Farr Sloan Library & Archives, Delaware Art Museum Acquisition Information Gift of Helen Farr Sloan Extent 5 items Access Restrictions Unrestricted Contact Information Helen Farr Sloan Library & Archives Delaware Art Museum 2301 Kentmere Parkway Wilmington, DE 19806 (302) 571-9590 [email protected] Preferred Citation Max Beerbohm Caricatures, Helen Farr Sloan Library & Archives, Delaware Art Museum 1 Biography of Max Beerbohm Max Beerbohm was born in London, England on Aug. 24, 1872. He was educated at Charterhouse and Merton College, Oxford. He was a critic, essayist and caricaturist. He contributed to the famous Yellow Book while still an undergraduate at Oxford. As a half brother of the actor-manager Herbert Beerbohm Tree, Max was a brilliant dramatic critic of the Saturday Review from 1898 to 1910, succeeding George Bernard Shaw. In 1910 he married an American actress, Florence Kahn and went to live in Rapallo, Italy (except for the duration of the two World Wars). A charming, witty, and elegant man, Beerbohm was a brilliant parodist and the master of a polished prose style. His works include A Christmas Garland (1912), a collection of parodies on such authors as Joseph Conrad and Thomas Hardy; Zuleika Dobson (1911), an amusing satire on Oxford; Seven Men (1919), stories; and And Even Now (1920) and Mainly on the Air (1947), essays. Beerbohm was accomplished at drawing, and he published several volumes of excellent caricatures, including The Poet’s Corner (1904) and Rossetti and His Circle (1922). He was knighted in 1939 on his return from Italy, where he had lived from 1910. -
Max Beerbohm
Max Beerbohm: An Inventory of His Collection at the Harry Ransom Center Descriptive Summary Creator: Beerbohm, Max, 1872-1956 Title: Max Beerbohm Art Collection Dates: 1880s-1946, undated Extent: 5 boxes, 2 oversize folders, 2 framed paintings (154 items) Abstract: The collection consists of 151 original works by Beerbohm and one reproductive print. The works consist mainly of caricatures of early twentieth century London celebrities and political figures. In addition, there are two drawings of Beerbohm done by Sir Osbert Lancaster and by Frank Richardson. Access: Open for research. A minimum of twenty-four hours is required to pull art materials to the Reading Room. Administrative Information Acquisition: Purchases (R307, R938, R1901, R2077, R2391, R2683, R2738, R3011, R3318, R3732, R3774, R3890, R4228, R4903, R5180, R5331) 1960-1970 Processed by: Alice Egan, 1997, and Helen Young, 2002 Repository: Harry Ransom Center, The University of Texas at Austin Beerbohm, Max, 1872-1956 Biographical Sketch Max Beerbohm, considered by some to be the best essayist, parodist, and cartoonist of his age, was born Henry Maximilian Beerbohm on August 24, 1872, in London, to Julius Ewald Beerbohm and his second wife, Eliza Draper Beerbohm. His early education was at a preparatory school in Orme Square, and then at Charterhouse. He attended Merton College at Oxford, 1890-1894, but did not receive a degree. While at Oxford, Beerbohm published caricatures and essays in the Strand and other periodicals. In 1893 he became acquainted with Sir William Rothenstein, who introduced him to Aubrey Beardsley and other members of the literary and artistic circle connected with the Bodley Head.