Caribbean Food Crops Society 42

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Caribbean Food Crops Society 42 CARIBBEAN FOOD CROPS SOCIETY 42 Forty Second Annual Meeting 2006 Carolina, Puerto Rico Vol. XLII-Number 2 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 42th ANNUAL MEETING Caribbean Food Crops Society 42th Annual Meeting July 9-15, 2006 Intercontinental Hotel Carolina, Puerto Rico "Food Safety and Value Added Production and Marketing in Tropical Crops" Edited by Héctor L. Santiago and Wanda I. Lugo Published by the Caribbean Food Crops Society Use of a beneficial nematode against pest mole crickets in Puerto Rico Ν. E. Vicente1, J. H. Frank2, and N. C. Leppla2 ABSTRACT A beneficial nematode, Steinemema scapterisci (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae), has been researched at the University of Florida and is now marketed as a biopesticide. Its primary target is the mole cricket, Scapteriscus vicinus Scudder (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae), which has been a pest in Florida for about 100 years. The nematode survives so well in Florida's sandy, low-organic soils that it serves as a classical biological control agent to provide permanent suppression of pest mole cricket populations in places to which it has spread. In Puerto Rico and islands of the Lesser Antilles, where there is a much wider range of soils, the primary mole cricket pest is Scapteriscus didactylus (Latreille). Our research evaluates the use of the nematode to control Scapteriscus didactylus. Our earlier results in the field showed establishment and survival for up to seven months in a sandy loam with mole crickets, but no establishment in a highly organic sandy soil with mole crickets. A laboratory bioassay in sterilized sand showed 100% survival of controls, but up to 100% mortality of mole crickets within 168 h dependent upon number of nematodes applied (dose or 'rate'). Laboratory survival of nematodes was poorer in non-sterilized soils than in sterilized soils. Key words: Gryllotalpidae, Scapteriscus didactylus, Steinemema scapterisci, Biological control RESUMEN El nematodo beneficioso, Steinemema scapterisci (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae), ha sido evaluado en la Universidad de Florida, y es mercadeado en la actualidad como un bioplaguicida. Su foco principal es la changa ο grillotopo Scapteriscus vicinus Scudder (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae), la cual ha sido una plaga en la Florida por aproximadamente 100 anos. El nematodo sobrevive muy bien en los suelos arenosos y con bajo porcentaje de materia orgânica de la Florida, de forma tal, que sirve como un agente de control biolôgico clâsico para suprimir de manera permanente las poblaciones de la changa en los lugares en donde ésta se ha diseminado. En Puerto Rico y en las islas de las Antillas Menores, en donde la diversidad de suelos es mâs amplia, Scapteriscus didactylus (Latreille) es la especie mâs importante. Nuestra investigaciôn évalua el uso del nematodo para el control de Scapteriscus didactylus. Resultados previos a nivel de campo muestran el establecimiento y supervivencia del nematodo hasta por siete meses en un suelo franco arenoso infestado con changas, pero no se ha logrado lo mismo en un suelo arenoso altamente orgânico. Un bioensayo de laboratorio en arena esterilizada mostrô 100% de supervivencia de los contrôles, y 1 Crop Protection Department, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez, PR 00681-9030. 2 Entomology & Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0630. 180 hasta 100% de mortalidad de las changas en un periodo de 168 h dependiendo del nûmero de nematodos aplicados (dosis). La supervivencia de los nematodos fue menor en suelos no esterilizados que en ios que fueron previamente esterilizados. INTRODUCTION The changa or West Indian mole cricket, Scapteriscus didactylus (Latreille) (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae), is the worst of a trio of invasive pest mole crickets of crop plants and turf in Puerto Rico, the Dominican Republic, and many of the Lesser Antilles, especially in irrigated, tilled, and sandy soils. It probably invaded Puerto Rico hundreds of years ago (JHF, unpublished). Introduction of biological control agents into Puerto Rico before 1940 may have partially solved the mole cricket pest problem (Cruz and Segarra, 1992), but not totally so. Those authors assumed that the specialist parasitoid wasp Larra bicolor (F.) (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae), introduced from South America in 1938 (Wolcott, 1938), caused a reduction in mole cricket populations. That may be so, but nobody seems to have evaluated absolute or even relative effects of L. bicolor. The tawny mole cricket, Scapteriscus vicinus (Scudder), is the worst of a trio of invasive pest mole crickets in Florida. It, too, was combated by introduction of L. bicolor from South America, but in 1988 (Frank et al., 1995). It also was combated by successful introduction of Ormia deplete (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tachinidae) and Steinernema scapterisci Nguyen and Smart (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) from South America in 1988 and 1985, respectively (Nguyen and Smart, 1990; Frank et al., 1996; Frank and Walker, 2006). Steinernema scapterisci was introduced into Florida as a classical biological control agent. However, it caught the attention of industry and is now marketed in the continental USA as a biopesticide under license from the University of Florida. Our objective was to evaluate how it might function in Puerto Rico as a classical biological control agent or as a biopesticide against Scapteriscus didactylus or the other two pest mole crickets that occur there. We have not attempted to introduce Ormia depleta into Puerto Rico. But in 2001-2004 we applied S. scapterisci at four field sites in western Puerto Rico. In November 2001 we applied S. scapterisci at (a) a sod farm near San German and (b) Punta Borinquen golf course (PB) in Aguadilla. Areas treated were in each case 0.2 ha. Applications were made in low evening light during light rain at the level of 2.47 billion infective-stage nemas per ha. Equipment was a hand-held sprayer nozzle attached to a truck-mounted pump and 95 L tank containing the nemas suspended in water. In May 2002, and again in August 2004, nemas were applied by sprinkling can, preceded and followed by copious irrigation, from a garden hose, to six (of thirteen) small plots of organically-grown vegetables in an organic sandy soil at Instituto Ann Wigmore in Aguada (AW). In February 2002, nemas were applied on two fairways of a golf course in south-central Puerto Rico in light rain in the early evening following irrigation and using a 568 L spray tank belonging to the golf course. In the final trial in August 2004 at PB, nemas were applied to five 0.2-ha plots (with five untreated plots) in an attempt to evaluate treatment effects; the manager/lessee insisted that all plots be in unirrigated areas (roughs); the golf course's spray equipment was used, but the manager/lessee would not allow application in the evening and insisted it be made 181 beginning at dawn to match his crew's normal work schedule. Although the employee who made the applications first applied 568 L of water from the tank (irrigation), and then applied the nematodes, the poor results in most plots suggest that inadequate irrigation and excessive exposure to ultraviolet radiation plus the hard-dried unirrigated soil caused rapid death of virtually all of the applied nematodes. Pitfall traps, modified from Lawrence (1982), were installed in all plots at all sites the day before application to collect mole crickets. Traps were emptied twice per week and all mole crickets were carried to the laboratory and held until death. All mole crickets that produced nematodes (or nematodes therefrom) were shipped in 5% formalin to Florida for nematode identification by Κ. B. Nguyen. Some of the applications were wasted effort. The sod farm near San German produced mole crickets parasitized by S. scapterisci for a few weeks until the entire area was flooded by a rising creek, after which no more nematode-parasitized mole crickets were obtained. The superintendent of the south-central golf course, who had been asked to check the pitfall traps twice weekly and send us mole crickets thus trapped, claimed that no mole crickets were ever trapped; we thought that was strange because we collected mole crickets on a pre-application visit to the site. The August 2004 application at PB was wasted effort when the manager/lessee insisted that we remove the pitfall traps after six months because they interfered with play - until then we had been collecting nematode-parasitized mole crickets. The most interesting applications were those of November 2001 at PB and in May 2002 and August 2004 at AW, but for disparate reasons. The soil at PB was a sandy loam of pH 6.87, which dried hard in the absence of rain or irrigation. The soil at AW was sand of pH 8.06 with a high organic content formed by addition of compost, and was kept moist by rain or irrigation. All mole crickets trapped at PB were S. didactylus; from November 2001 through June 2002 (7 mo) considerable numbers were trapped and a considerable proportion was parasitized by S. scapterisci. Then, the part-time student employee performing the field work left, another was hired in replacement, and the number of mole crickets recorded fell rapidly, with none recorded as parasitized. We may at least conclude that S. scapterisci became established for seven months after application in 2001. Mole crickets trapped at AW were a mixture of S. didactylus and S. abbreviatus (Scudder); none was ever recorded as parasitized despite the two applications of nematodes in seemingly ideal conditions. Because of this disparity and because we had read about nematode-suppressive soils (e.g., Kopppenhöfer et al., 1996; Gao and Becker, 2002) we resolved to test survival of S. scapterisci in soils of those two localities, as well as the dose of nematodes required to kill S. didactylus. MATERIALS AND METHODS Steinemema scapterisci bioassay against mole crickets. A bioassay was set up in plastic cups (120 ml, 7 cm depth) with perforated lids (to allow air circulation) to assess the effects of a range of closes of these beneficial nematodes on mortality of field-collected adult S.
Recommended publications
  • Are Biologicals Smart Mole Cricket Control?
    Are biologicals smart mole cricket control? by HOWARD FRANK / University of Florida ost turf managers try to control mole faster than the biopesticides, but the biopesticides cricket pests with a bait, or granules or affect a narrower range of non-target organisms and liquid containing something that kills are more environmentally acceptable. The "biora- them. That "something" may be chemi- tional" chemicals are somewhere in between, be- M cause they tend to work more slowly than the tradi- cal materials (a chemical pesticide) or living biologi- cal materials (a biopesticide). tional chemicals, and to have less effect on animals Some of the newer chemical materials, called other than insects. "biorationals," are synthetic chemicals that, for ex- Natives not pests ample, mimic the action of insects' growth hor- The 10 mole cricket species in the U.S. and its mones to interfere with development. territories (including Puerto Rico and the Virgin Is- The biological materials may be insect-killing ne- lands) differ in appearance, distribution, behavior matodes (now available commercially) or fungal or and pest status. bacterial pathogens (being tested experimentally). In fact, the native mole crickets are not pests. These products can be placed exactly where they Our pest mole crickets are immigrant species. are needed. In general, the chemical pesticides work The three species that arouse the ire of turf man- agers in the southeastern states all belong Natural enemies to the genus Scapteriscus. They came from Introducing the specialist natural ene- South America, arriving at the turn of the mies from South America to the southeast- century in ships' ballast.
    [Show full text]
  • Incorporating Genomics Into the Toolkit of Nematology
    Journal of Nematology 44(2):191–205. 2012. Ó The Society of Nematologists 2012. Incorporating Genomics into the Toolkit of Nematology 1 2 1,* ADLER R. DILLMAN, ALI MORTAZAVI, PAUL W. STERNBERG Abstract: The study of nematode genomes over the last three decades has relied heavily on the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans, which remains the best-assembled and annotated metazoan genome. This is now changing as a rapidly expanding number of nematodes of medical and economic importance have been sequenced in recent years. The advent of sequencing technologies to achieve the equivalent of the $1000 human genome promises that every nematode genome of interest will eventually be sequenced at a reasonable cost. As the sequencing of species spanning the nematode phylum becomes a routine part of characterizing nematodes, the comparative approach and the increasing use of ecological context will help us to further understand the evolution and functional specializations of any given species by comparing its genome to that of other closely and more distantly related nematodes. We review the current state of nematode genomics and discuss some of the highlights that these genomes have revealed and the trend and benefits of ecological genomics, emphasizing the potential for new genomes and the exciting opportunities this provides for nematological studies. Key words: ecological genomics, evolution, genomics, nematodes, phylogenetics, proteomics, sequencing. Nematoda is one of the most expansive phyla docu- piece of knowledge we can currently obtain for any mented with free-living and parasitic species found in particular life form (Consortium, 1998). nearly every ecological niche(Yeates, 2004). Traditionally, As in many other fields of biology, the nematode C.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Tachinidae) Larvae
    Welch: Competition by Ormia depleta 497 INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION FOR RESOURCES BY ORMIA DEPLETA (DIPTERA: TACHINIDAE) LARVAE C. H. WELCH USDA/ARS/cmave, 1600 SW 23rd Drive, Gainesville, FL 32608 ABSTRACT Ormia depleta is a parasitoid of pest mole crickets in the southeastern United States. From 2 to 8 larvae of O. depleta were placed on each of 368 mole cricket hosts and allowed to de- velop. The weights of the host crickets, number of larvae placed, number of resulting pupae, and the weights of those pupae were all factored to determine optimal parasitoid density per host under laboratory rearing conditions. Based on larval survival and pupal weight, this study indicates that 4-5 larvae per host is optimal for laboratory rearing. Key Words: biocontrol, Scapteriscus, parasitoid, superparasitism RESUMEN Ormia depleta es un parasitoide de grillotopos en el sureste de los Estados Unidos. Entre 2 y 8 larvas de O. depleta se colocaron en 368 grillotopos huéspedes y se dejaron madurar. El peso de los huéspedes, el número de larvas de O. depleta colocadas, el número de pupas re- sultantes y el peso de las pupas fueron usados para determinar la densidad optima de para- sitoides en cada huésped para ser usadas en la reproducción de este parasitoide en el laboratorio. Nuestros resultados muestran que entre 4 y 5 larvas por cada grillotopo es la densidad optima para la reproducción en el laboratorio de este parasitoide. Translation provided by the author. Ormia depleta (Wiedemann) is a parasitoid of protocol requires hand inoculation of 3 planidia Scapteriscus spp. mole crickets, imported pests of under the posterior margin of the pronotum of turf and pasture grasses in the southeastern each host (R.
    [Show full text]
  • Mole Crickets Scapteriscus Spp
    Mole Crickets Scapteriscus spp. Southern mole cricket, Scapteriscus borellii Tawny mole cricket, Scapteriscus vicinus DESCRIPTION OF INSECT All stages live in the soil and are rarely see on the surface. Immature stage Nymphs of both species are similar in appearance to adults, but lack wings. Nymphs proceed through 8-10 instars ranging in size from 0.2 to 1.25 inches in length. Each instar is progressively larger with wing buds apparent on later instars. Color varies from gray to brown. Pronotum (large shield behind head) with distinctive mottling or spots, depending on species and location. Mature stage Adults are somewhat cylindrically shaped, light colored crickets 1.26 to 1.38 inches in length. Adults have two pairs of wings, but only fly at night during two brief flight periods in fall and early spring. Spring flights are generally more extensive than fall flights. Damaging stage(s) Both nymphs and adults cause damage Predictive models (degree day, plant phenology, threat temperatures, other) Eggs being to hatch at threat temperatures of 65° F and higher (spring/early summer in most locations). Egg-laying and hatch timing are affected by soil moisture. Threat temperatures can be used to trigger preventive treatments. See the article, “Threat temperatures” for more information. Preventive treatments should be applied prior to egg-hatch (early June) or at the time of peak hatch (last week of June, first week of July in most years and locations). Weekly soap flushes in June and early July is the best method to determine when hatch is occurring, and the best time to treat.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Mole Cricket Control on Horizon
    Long-term mole cricket control on horizon A nematode product patented for use by the University of Florida to provide long-term biological con- trol of turf-damaging mole crickets will be available next year from Becker Underwood. This product, known as Nematac S, will be cost-effective and highly beneficial for a wide range of consumers, from golf- course managers to ranchers. By Angela Brammer UF graduate student The parasitic nematode Stein- ernema scapterisci attacks only for- eign mole crickets — those that are most damaging to turfgrasses in the Southeast. The nematodes live in the soil and enter the mole cricket through openings in the body, such as the mouth or spiracles. Once in- side, they release bacteria that feed on the mole cricket, usually killing it within 48 hours. The nematodes feed on the bacteria and reproduce inside the mole cricket, and the next generation emerges to search for another host once it dies. Steinernema scapterisci spreads slowly on its own, mostly relying on University of Florida/Dr. K.B. Nguyen its host for dispersal. After infection, Steinernema scapterisci nematodes emerge from the body of a dead a mole cricket may fly up to a mile, tawny mole cricket. taking its parasitic nematodes along for the ride. Nematodes then emerge on insecticides to prevent such dam- Applying them just beneath the sur- into the new location once the host age. face provides some protection from cricket dies. Because of this, it may In the 1980s, University of Flor- desiccation and ultraviolet light. be possible to effectively cover an ida scientists imported the mole Surface distribution should be fol- area of mole cricket infestation by cricket nematode from South Amer- lowed by irrigation to help the applying the nematodes to the “hot ica.
    [Show full text]
  • Tawny Mole Cricket
    INSECT PESTS Tawny Mole Cricket Prepared by Camille Goodwin, MG 2008 Texas AgriLife Extension Service Galveston County Office Dickinson, TX 77539 Educational programs of the Texas AgriLife Extension Service are open to all people without regard to race, color, sex, disability, religion, age, or national origin. The Texas A&M System, U.S. Department of Agriculture and the County Commissioners Courts of Texas cooperating. FIG. 1 Type Pest: chewing insect (Scapteriscus vicinus Scudder) • Another closely related mole cricket, the southern mole cricket (Scapteriscus borellia Giglio-Tos) also occurs in the Galveston-Houston area Type Metamorphous: simple (egg, nymph and adult stages) Period of Primary Activity: April through October Plants Affected • Bermudagrass and bahiagrass are the primary turfgrasses damaged by the mole cricket, although extensive damage can be sustained on cultivars of St. Augustinegrass, FIG. 2 centipedegrass, ryegrass, zoysiagrass and bentgrass • Tomato, strawberry, beet, cabbage, cantaloupe, carrot, cauliflower, collard, eggplant, kale, lettuce, onion, pepper, potato, spinach, sweet potato, turnip, flowers such as coleus, chrysanthemum, gypsophila, and other plants • Mole crickets feed on other soil-dwelling insects Identifying Characteristics of Insect Pest EGG STAGE • After mating and dispersal flights occur, females lay eggs in cells dug in the soil primarly during April with some egg laying occurring into early summer • Eggs hatch in about 2 weeks FIG. 3 NYMPH STAGES • Nymphs develop through eight juvenile stages (separated by molts) mostly during the summer months. • Each successive growth stage (instar) is larger and looks more and more like the adult but lack fully developed wings • Winter is spent as partially grown nymphs and as adults ADULT STAGE (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Mole Cricket: Scapteriscus Vicinus Shortwinged Mole Cricket: Scapteriscus Abbreviatus
    Tawny Mole Cricket: Scapteriscus vicinus Shortwinged Mole Cricket: Scapteriscus abbreviatus Biology & Lifecycle: Adults and larger nymphs chew on stems of seedlings and smaller plants at the soil surface. The tawny mole cricket has one generation each year and overwinters as adults, which lay eggs in April through early June. Nymphs grow slowly through the summer months and start becoming adults in September. The shortwinged mole cricket is almost restricted to coastal areas. Most eggs are laid in late spring through early summer. Females of both species lay clutches of eggs in underground egg chambers. Environmental Factors: Tawny and shortwinged mole crickets are present year-around, with adults and large nymphs overwintering but inactivated by cold temperatures and drought (they burrow deeper underground). Irrigation during drought allows them to be active. Flooding forces them to migrate to higher ground. Adult: Adults are large, about 1¼ inches, with wings longer than body (tawny mole cricket (Figure 3)) or very much shorter than body (shortwinged mole cricket (Figure 1)). Both adults and nymphs have enlarged and toothed forelegs for digging; expanded femurs (base of the hind legs) for jumping, although only nymphs jump. All species have soft bodies, with the middle body section protected by a hardened cover (pronotum). Immature: Nymphs range from less than 1/8 inch at hatching to about 1 inch several months later, resembling the adults but without trace of wings in the first 4 instars and with small wing buds in later instars. The number of molts varies from 6 to 9 (Figure 5). Host range: Both species attack seedlings of eggplant, sweet pepper, tobacco, tomato and cabbage.
    [Show full text]
  • Olfaction Shapes Host–Parasite Interactions in Parasitic Nematodes
    Olfaction shapes host–parasite interactions in PNAS PLUS parasitic nematodes Adler R. Dillmana, Manon L. Guillerminb, Joon Ha Leeb, Brian Kima, Paul W. Sternberga,1, and Elissa A. Hallemb,1 aHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125; and bDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 Contributed by Paul W. Sternberg, July 9, 2012 (sent for review May 8, 2012) Many parasitic nematodes actively seek out hosts in which to host recognition (19). IJs then infect the host either by entering complete their lifecycles. Olfaction is thought to play an important through natural orifices or by penetrating through the insect role in the host-seeking process, with parasites following a chem- cuticle (20). Following infection, IJs release a bacterial endo- ical trail toward host-associated odors. However, little is known symbiont into the insect host and resume development (21–23). about the olfactory cues that attract parasitic nematodes to hosts The bacteria proliferate inside the insect, producing an arsenal or the behavioral responses these cues elicit. Moreover, what little of secondary metabolites that lead to rapid insect death and is known focuses on easily obtainable laboratory hosts rather digestion of insect tissues. The nematodes feed on the multi- than on natural or other ecologically relevant hosts. Here we in- plying bacteria and the liberated nutrients of broken-down in- vestigate the olfactory responses of six diverse species of ento- sect tissues. They reproduce in the cadaver until resources are mopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) to seven ecologically relevant depleted, at which time new IJs form and disperse in search of potential invertebrate hosts, including one known natural host new hosts (24).
    [Show full text]
  • Nematodes As Biocontrol Agents This Page Intentionally Left Blank Nematodes As Biocontrol Agents
    Nematodes as Biocontrol Agents This page intentionally left blank Nematodes as Biocontrol Agents Edited by Parwinder S. Grewal Department of Entomology Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio USA Ralf-Udo Ehlers Department of Biotechnology and Biological Control Institute for Phytopathology Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Raisdorf Germany David I. Shapiro-Ilan United States Department of Agriculture Agriculture Research Service Southeastern Fruit and Tree Nut Research Laboratory, Byron, Georgia USA CABI Publishing CABI Publishing is a division of CAB International CABI Publishing CABI Publishing CAB International 875 Massachusetts Avenue Wallingford 7th Floor Oxfordshire OX10 8DE Cambridge, MA 02139 UK USA Tel: þ44 (0)1491 832111 Tel: þ1 617 395 4056 Fax: þ44 (0)1491 833508 Fax: þ1 617 354 6875 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.cabi-publishing.org ßCAB International 2005. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronically, mech- anically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library, London, UK. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Nematodes as biocontrol agents / edited by Parwinder S. Grewal, Ralf- Udo Ehlers, David I. Shapiro-Ilan. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-85199-017-7 (alk. paper) 1. Nematoda as biological pest control agents. I. Grewal, Parwinder S. II. Ehlers, Ralf-Udo. III. Shaprio-Ilan, David I. SB976.N46N46 2005 632’.96–dc22 2004030022 ISBN 0 85199 0177 Typeset by SPI Publisher Services, Pondicherry, India Printed and bound in the UK by Biddles Ltd., King’s Lynn This volume is dedicated to Dr Harry K.
    [Show full text]
  • Howard Frank Professor Emeritus
    J. Howard Frank Professor Emeritus Contact: PO Box 110620 Building 970, Natural Area Dr. Gainesville, FL 32611 (352) 273-3922 [email protected] Education B.Sc. (Honors), Durham University, England (Zoology), 1963 D.Phil., Oxford University, England (Entomology), 1967 Relevant Employment History Professor (1987-2012) Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida Associate Professor (1985-1987) Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida Associate Professor (1983-1985) Florida Medical Entomology Lab, Vero Beach, FL Entomologist (1972-1983) Entomological Research Center (later Florida Medical Entomology Lab), Vero Beach, FL Entomologist (1968-1972) Research Department, Sugar Manufacturers' Association, Mandeville, Jamaica Post-doctoral Fellow (1966-1968) Entomology Department, University of Alberta, Canada Former Research Responsibilities Biological control of pest insects using parasitoids, predators, or pathogens. Current projects are against Scapteriscus mole crickets (pests of turf, pasture grasses, and vegetables), and Metamasius callizona (pest of bromeliads). Former Teaching responsibilities Biological Control (ENY 5241), a course for graduate students. Tropical Entomology for undergraduates (ENY 3563/ENY 3564L) and for graduates (ENY 5566/ENY 5567L). Supervision of research by graduate students. Former Extension responsibilities Extension of results of the research project Accomplishments Introduction, colonization, release, and establishment in at least 38 Florida counties of Ormia depleta (Diptera: Tachinidae)
    [Show full text]
  • Caribbean Food Crops Society Serving the Caribbean Since 1963 Caribbean Food Crops Society 40
    CARIBBEAN FOOD CROPS SOCIETY SERVING THE CARIBBEAN SINCE 1963 CARIBBEAN FOOD CROPS SOCIETY 40 Fortieth Annual Meeting 2004 Proceedings of the Caribbean Food Crops Society. 40:249-183. 2004 A COMMERCI AL NEMATODE FOR MOLE CRICKET CONTROL N.C. Leppla1, J.H. Frank', N. Vicente2 and A. Pantoja3. 1 University of Florida, IF AS, P.O. Box 110620, Gainesville, FL 32611-0620, 2University of Puerto Rico, Agricultural Experiment Station, P.O. Box 9030, Mayaguez, PR 00681-9030, United States Department of Agriculture, ARS, SARU, Fairbanks, AK99775-7200 ABSTRACT: In Puerto Rico, the name "changa" is generally applied to Scapteriscus didactylus (Latreille) (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae), the most widespread and damaging of the non- indigenous pest mole crickets in Puerto Rico. S. abbreviatus Scudder is also established but much less abundant. We conducted a T-STAR project to efficiently release, establish, distribute and evaluate the entomopathogenic nematode, Stinernema scapterisci Nguyen and Smart (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae), for controlling Scapteriscus spp. mole crickets. The University of Florida negotiated an agreement with Becker Underwood for commercial production of the nematode that is available as the product, Nematac®S. The "mole cricket nematode" has been used effectively to control non-indigenous mole crickets in pastures and turf in Florida since the early 1990s. It parasitizes only Scapteriscus spp. in nature and not indigenous mole crickets that are in a different genus, so it is safe to import and release. The level of mole cricket infection, nematode establishment and dispersal, and suppression of mole cricket populations is being quantified. This project provided data on the occurrence and life history of Scapteriscus spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Entomopathogenic Nematodes for the Control of Gryllus Sp. (Orthoptera
    AGRICULTURAL MICROBIOLOGY / SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE DOI: 10.1590/1808‑1657000442017 Entomopathogenic nematodes for the control of Gryllus sp. (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) under laboratory and field conditions Nematoides entomopatogênicos no controle de Gryllus sp. (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) em condições de laboratório e campo Vanessa Andaló1* , Kellin Patrícia Rossati1, Fábio Janoni Carvalho1 , Jéssica Mieko1, Lucas Silva de Faria1 , Gleice Aparecida de Assis1 , Leonardo Rodrigues Barbosa2 ABSTRACT: Entomopathogenic nematodes are effective in RESUMO: Os nematoides entomopatogênicos (NEPs) são eficazes controlling soil insects and they are used in agricultural systems. contra insetos de solo e têm sido usados em sistemas agrícolas. A ação The virulence of entomopathogenic nematodes on crickets de NEPs sobre grilos (Gryllus L.) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) foi avaliada (Gryllus L.) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) was evaluated under different em condições de laboratório e campo, a fim de selecionar populações conditions in order to select populations for application in the para aplicação em área de cultivo. Foram realizados testes de virulên- field. Virulence tests with Heterorhabditis amazonensis RSC05, cia com Heterorhabditis amazonensis RSC05, H. amazonensis MC01, H. amazonensis MC01, Steinernema carpocapsae All (Weiser) Steinernema carpocapsae All (Weiser) e H. amazonensis GL, assim como and H. amazonensis GL were performed. Evaluations were then verificadas a adequação da concentração de juvenis infectantes (100, made of the concentrations of infective juveniles (100, 200, 200, 400 e 600 juvenis infectantes por inseto) e a preferência alimen- 400 and 600 infective juveniles per insect); feeding preference tar sem chance de escolha e com chance de escolha, além do teste de with or without choice; and field tests using traps to evaluate campo utilizando armadilhas para amostragem dos insetos.
    [Show full text]