DOCSLIB.ORG

“Being Neutral Is Our Biggest Crime”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“Being Neutral Is Our Biggest Crime” “Being Neutral is Our Biggest Crime” Government, Vigilante, and Naxalite Abuses in India’s Chhattisgarh State Copyright © 2008 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-356-0 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org July 2008 1-56432-356-0 “Being Neutral is Our Biggest Crime” Government, Vigilante, and Naxalite Abuses in India’s Chhattisgarh State Maps........................................................................................................................ 1 Glossary/ Abbreviations ..........................................................................................3 I. Summary.............................................................................................................5 Government and Salwa Judum abuses ................................................................7 Abuses by Naxalites..........................................................................................10 Key Recommendations: The need for protection and accountability................... 12 II. Methodology.................................................................................................... 15 Terminology...................................................................................................... 17 III. Background......................................................................................................19 Naxalism in India ..............................................................................................19 Salwa Judum: Vigilantes to oust Naxalites.........................................................23 Deployment of government security forces........................................................25 Civil society challenges to a failed policy...........................................................27 IV. Abuses by Salwa Judum................................................................................... 29 A. Salwa Judum raids on villages coercing civilian participation......................... 31 B. Coercing camp residents’ participation in Salwa Judum................................39 C. Salwa Judum reprisals against villagers who leave camps ............................ 41 D. Salwa Judum reprisals against villagers who have fled to Andhra Pradesh....43 V. Abuses by the State ..........................................................................................46 A. Killings, beatings, burnings, and pillage........................................................46 B. Arbitrary detention, torture, and “disappearances” .......................................54 C. Failure of the government to investigate abuses............................................58 D. Government intimidation of NGOs, journalists, and lawyers ..........................61 VI. Plight of Persons Displaced by the Conflict ...................................................... 69 A. Failure of the Chhattisgarh government to provide adequate assistance to displaced persons ............................................................................................ 71 B. “Double jeopardy”: Abuses against displaced persons by Andhra Pradesh authorities ........................................................................................................82 VII. Abuses by Naxalites.........................................................................................97 A. Threats, extortions, and killings ....................................................................97 B. Use of landmines and IEDs.......................................................................... 104 C. Reprisals against Salwa Judum camp residents ...........................................106 D. Reprisals against Naxalite deserters ............................................................111 E. CPI (Maoist) Party statements...................................................................... 112 VIII. Recruitment and Use of Children ....................................................................115 A. Government recruitment and use of children as special police officers .........117 B. Recruitment and use of children by Naxalites .............................................. 129 IX. Impact of the Conflict on Education ................................................................. 142 A. Disruption of schooling in Dantewada and Bijapur districts ......................... 142 B. Displaced children’s access to education in Andhra Pradesh....................... 145 X. Recommendations ........................................................................................... 147 To the Indian central government .................................................................... 147 To the Chhattisgarh state government............................................................. 150 To the Andhra Pradesh government................................................................. 152 To the CPI (Maoist) Party ................................................................................. 153 To Foreign governments, Intergovernmental Bodies, and International Financial Institutions ..................................................................................................... 154 Appendix I............................................................................................................ 155 Appendix II........................................................................................................... 156 Acknowledgments................................................................................................ 167 Maps © 2008 John Emerson 1 Human Rights Watch July 2008 © 2008 John Emerson “Being Neutral is Our Biggest Crime” 2 Glossary/ Abbreviations Abhiyan Campaign Adivasi Literally meaning “original habitant,” a term used to refer to indigenous tribal communities in India Anganwadi Government-run early childhood care and education center under the Integrated Child Development Services Scheme Ashram school Government-run residential school in rural areas Bal sangam Village-level Naxalite children’s association Block Administrative division. Several blocks make a district CAF Chhattisgarh Armed Force, under the control of the Chhattisgarh state government CNM Chaitanya Natya Manch, a street theater troupe organized and managed by Naxalites CPI (Maoist) Communist Party of India (Maoist), a prominent Naxalite political party CRPF Central Reserve Police Force, paramilitary police under the control of the Indian central government Dalam Armed squad of Naxalites Dalit Literally meaning “broken” people, a term for so-called “untouchables” DGP Director general of police District Administrative division. Many districts make a state District collector Highest district-level administrative officer Director general of police Highest police official in the state 3 Human Rights Watch July 2008 Gram Panchayat/ Literally meaning “assembly of five,” a term used to Panchayat refer to the village-level councils of elected government representatives ICCPR International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights ICESCR International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights IED Improvised explosive device IRB Indian Reserve Battalion, paramilitary police under the control of the Indian central government ITDA Integrated Tribal Development Agency Jan adalats “People’s courts” organized by Naxalites Jan militia Armed informers who travel with dalams MHA Ministry of Home Affairs NCPCR National Commission for the Protection of Child Rights NHRC National Human Rights Commission Patel Village headman PLGA People’s Liberation Guerrilla Army, standing army of CPI (Maoist) party Sangam Village-level Naxalite association Sarpanch Village official—head of the gram panchayat SHRC State Human Rights Commission SP Superintendent of Police SPOs Special police officers, auxiliary police force Superintendent of police Highest district-level police officer (SP) Tribe/tribal Term used to refer to indigenous people in India “Being Neutral is Our Biggest Crime” 4 I. Summary We often wonder what sins we committed to be born at this time. Our lives are impossible. Naxalites come and threaten us. They demand food and ask us to help them with information about police movements. Then the police come. They beat us and ask us for information. We are caught between these people. There is no way out. — A resident of Errabore, a government-run camp, January 2008 In Chhattisgarh state in central India, a dramatic escalation of a little-known conflict since June 2005 has destroyed hundreds of villages and uprooted tens of thousands of people from their homes. Caught in a deadly tug-of-war between an armed Maoist movement on one side, and government security forces and a vigilante
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “Being Neutral Is Our Biggest Crime”
    India “Being Neutral HUMAN RIGHTS is Our Biggest Crime” WATCH Government, Vigilante, and Naxalite Abuses in India’s Chhattisgarh State “Being Neutral is Our Biggest Crime” Government, Vigilante, and Naxalite Abuses in India’s Chhattisgarh State Copyright © 2008 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-356-0 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org July 2008 1-56432-356-0 “Being Neutral is Our Biggest Crime” Government, Vigilante, and Naxalite Abuses in India’s Chhattisgarh State Maps........................................................................................................................ 1 Glossary/ Abbreviations ..........................................................................................3 I. Summary.............................................................................................................5 Government and Salwa Judum abuses ................................................................7 Abuses by Naxalites..........................................................................................10 Key Recommendations: The need for protection and accountability..................
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Modernisation of Police Forces Scheme on Combat Capability of the Police Forces in Naxal-Affected States
    The menace of Left Wing Extremism (LWE), commonly termed as Naxalism and Maoist IDSA Occasional Paper No. 7 insurgency, has been categorised as the single biggest challenge to India’s internal security by the Prime Minister. He urged the Centre as well as States, to urgently employ all December 2009 available resources to cripple the virus of Naxalism. The Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs has adopted a multi-prong strategy to deal with the Naxal menace, including an effective security response to curb rebel violence. Due to socio-economic roots of the problem, emphasis is being laid on employing the State Police Forces to tackle the Naxal violence. However, the Government’s security response, have been ineffective in most of the States except a few. Inadequate combat capability of police forces in Naxalism-affected States is considered a prime factor for failing security response. The police forces in most of the States are tremendously capacity-deficient in terms of manpower, resources, training and infrastructure. Impact of Modernisation of Police Forces This occasional paper attempts to assess and analyse the impact of the MPF scheme on building police combat capability in affected States. In order to realistically assess the Scheme on Combat Capability of the impact of the MPF scheme, the paper focuses on the ongoing MPF scheme in various affected States in general, and the States of Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand and Orissa in Police Forces in Naxal-Affected States: particular, which are worst hit and generally considered to be having the least developed police capability. A Critical Evaluation Commandant Om Shankar Jha, is a serving officer of the Border Security Force (BSF).
    [Show full text]
  • India's Police Complaints Authorities
    India’s Police Complaints Authorities: A Broken System with Fundamental Flaws A Legal Analysis CHRI Briefing Paper September 2020 Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative The Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI) is an independent, non-governmental, non- profit organisation headquartered in New Delhi, with offices in London, United Kingdom, and Accra, Ghana. Since 1987, it has worked for the practical realization of human rights through strategic advocacy and engagement as well as mobilization around these issues in Commonwealth countries. CHRI’s specialisation in the areas of Access to Justice (ATJ) and Access to Information (ATI) are widely known. The ATJ programme has focussed on Police and Prison Reforms, to reduce arbitrariness and ensure transparency while holding duty bearers to account. CHRI looks at policy interventions, including legal remedies, building civil society coalitions and engaging with stakeholders. The ATI looks at Right to Information (RTI) and Freedom of Information laws across geographies, provides specialised advice, sheds light on challenging issues, processes for widespread use of transparency laws and develops capacity. CHRI reviews pressures on freedom of expression and media rights while a focus on Small States seeks to bring civil society voices to bear on the UN Human Rights Council and the Commonwealth Secretariat. A growing area of work is SDG 8.7 where advocacy, research and mobilization is built on tackling Contemporary Forms of Slavery and human trafficking through the Commonwealth 8.7 Network. CHRI has special consultative status with the UN Economic and Social Council and is accredited to the Commonwealth Secretariat. Recognised for its expertise by governments, oversight bodies and civil society, it is registered as a society in India, a trust in Ghana, and a public charity in the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Combating Left Wing Extremism: Is Police Training Lacking? | 1
    IDSA Occasional Paper No. 3 The menace of Left Wing Extremism (LWE), commonly termed as Naxalism and Maoist insurgency, has been categorised as the single biggest challenge to India’s internal security by the June 2009 Prime Minister. He urged the Centre as well as States, to urgently employ all available resources to cripple the virus of Naxalism. The Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs has adopted a multi-prong strategy to deal with the Naxal menace, including an effective security response to curb rebel’s violence. Due to socio-economic roots of the problem, emphasis is being laid on employing the State Police Forces to tackle the Naxal violence. However, the Government’s security response, have been ineffective in most of the States except a few. Inadequate combat capability of police forces in Naxalism-affected States is considered a prime factor for failing security response. Lack of proper training to police forces, due to poor infrastructure, resources and environment, Combating Left Wing Extremism is often attributed to inadequate combat capability of police forces. This occasional paper attempts to briefly assess the ineffective security response and Is Police Training Lacking? importance of police training, in Naxalism-affected States in general, and examines Chhattisgarh as a case study; in particular. The paper also discusses the role of the Centre in police training, and briefly assesses the overall police training environment and culture. At the end, the paper identifies some corrective measures and makes relevant policy Case Study of Chhattisgarh recommendations. Commandant Om Shankar Jha, is a serving officer of the Border Security Force (BSF).
    [Show full text]
  • “Between Two Sets of Guns” Attacks on Civil Society Activists in India’S Maoist Conflict WATCH
    HUMAN RIGHTS “Between Two Sets of Guns” Attacks on Civil Society Activists in India’s Maoist Conflict WATCH “Between Two Sets of Guns” Attacks on Civil Society Activists in India’s Maoist Conflict Copyright © 2012 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-920-8 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org JULY 2012 ISBN: 1-56432-920-8 “Between Two Sets of Guns” Attacks on Civil Society Activists in India’s Maoist Conflict Map of India ................................................................................................................................ ii Summary ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Enticing the Maoist Guerrilla – India's Coin Strategy and Evolving
    J. S. Asian Stud. 07 (03) 2019. 95-109 DOI: 10.33687/jsas.007.03.2959 Available Online at EScience Press Journal of South Asian Studies ISSN: 2307-4000 (Online), 2308-7846 (Print) https://esciencepress.net/journals/JSAS ENTICING THE MAOIST GUERRILLA – INDIA’S COIN STRATEGY AND EVOLVING SURRENDER AND REHABILITATION POLICY Sajid F. Shapoo Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States. *Corresponding Author Email ID: [email protected] A B S T R A C T Debates about the utility of different COIN models in the Indian scenario continue to evoke extreme reactions. Experts believe that Indian COIN efforts have invariably preferred trading “hearts and minds” approach with highly kinetic enemy centric tactics. It is argued that Indian security leadership feels that an enemy centric approach is best suited for Maoist insurgency, where the fear of population seceding from India is remote. India is blamed for not having a focused or a formal COIN strategy against the Maoist insurgency. It is only in the last decade that individual states have begun to harmonize their COIN responses with one another and with the Government of India (GoI) policies. A national surrender and rehabilitation policy were formulated in 2014; considered to be an important component of the new approach. Following federal guidelines, states have formulated their surrender policies. It may be myopic to assess these policies in isolation and these need to be evaluated in whole as a part of comprehensive COIN approach. The verdict till now is a mixed bag, while some states have tasted success with the scrupulous implementation of the new surrender policies, others have resorted to sham surrenders to shore up the numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • SMART-Policing-2016.Pdf
    SMART P LICING AWA R D S 2 0 1 6 COMPENDIUM of BEST PRACTICES IN SMART POLICING SMART P LICING AWA R D S 2 0 1 6 Table of Contents List of Abbreviations . 02 Foreword. 03 Executive Summary . 05 Best Practices in SMART Policing . 15 nChild Safety . 17 nCommunity Policing . 23 nElderly Safety . 43 nHuman Trafficking . 49 nRoad Safety and Traffic Management . 53 nWomen Safety . 65 nOther Policing Initiatives . 71 Esteemed Jury Members . 83 List of Entries Received for FICCI SMART Policing Awards 2016 . 89 Disclaimer: This compendium presents a compilation of selected SMART Policing initiatives in India, which were received for the FICCI FICCI Security Department . 95 SMART Policing Awards for the year 2016. This compendium has been produced by FICCI, based on the information provided by various State Police Forces and Central Armed Police Forces, in the entry forms for the Awards. Although FICCI has made every effort to cross-check the information provided in the entries, the veracity of the factual details rests with the security and law enforcement agencies. This document is for information only and should not be treated as a consultative or suggestive report. This publication is not intended to be a substitute for any professional, legal or technical advice. FICCI do not accept any liability, whatsoever, for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this document or its content. SMART P LICING AWA R D S 2 0 1 6 Table of Contents List of Abbreviations . 02 Foreword. 03 Executive Summary . 05 Best Practices in SMART Policing . 15 nChild Safety .
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Press Release from Civil Liberties Organisations 2
    Enclosures: 1. Joint Press Release from Civil Liberties Organisations 2. Press Release from Peoples Union for Democratic Rights, Delhi 3. Appeal From Chhattisgarh PUCL 4. Press Release from Chhattisgarh PUCL 5. Chhattisgarh PUCL statement on fake encounters 6. Open Letter from the Brother of Dr. Binayak Sen 7. Bio-data of Dr. Binayak Sen Joint Press Release from Civil Liberties Organisations Dated: 13 May 2007 We strongly condemn the threats being held out by the Superintendent of Police, Raipur, to activists of PUCL, Chhattisgarh and other democratic activists. Dr Binayak Sen, Mr Gautham Bandopadyay, Ms Rashmi Dwivedi, and others have been branded as Maoist sympathisers, and the Chhattisgarh Special Public Security Act is being invoked to jail them. There is nothing original or new about such threats. It is well known that the Chhattisgarh Government has been indulging in the most brazen brutality in the adivasi areas of the State to suppress the Maoist movement. In the erstwhile Bastar district in the South it has fostered a private army called Salwa Judum and has licensed it to indulge in killing and arson against Maoist sympathisers, working in tandem with the police and the paramilitary. In the northern districts, especially Sarguja, the police are indulging in torture and staged encounter killings. The PUCL, Chhattisgarh and other democratic activists have been raising their voice and campaigning against these illegal and inhuman practices, and for this service to democracy, the familiar allegation of being a 'Maoist' is made against them. When the Chhatisgarh Special Public Security Act was enacted, we expressed the apprehension that it would be used against democratic movements and activists, and the apprehension has been proved right.
    [Show full text]
  • Amnesty International Report 2016/17 Amnesty International
    AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL REPORT 2016/17 AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. First published in 2017 by Except where otherwise noted, This report documents Amnesty Amnesty International Ltd content in this document is International’s work and Peter Benenson House, licensed under a Creative concerns through 2016. 1, Easton Street, Commons (attribution, non- The absence of an entry in this London WC1X 0DW commercial, no derivatives, report on a particular country or United Kingdom international 4.0) licence. territory does not imply that no https://creativecommons.org/ © Amnesty International 2017 human rights violations of licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode concern to Amnesty International Index: POL 10/4800/2017 For more information please visit have taken place there during ISBN: 978-0-86210-496-2 the permissions page on our the year. Nor is the length of a website: www.amnesty.org country entry any basis for a A catalogue record for this book comparison of the extent and is available from the British amnesty.org depth of Amnesty International’s Library. concerns in a country. Original language: English ii Amnesty International
    [Show full text]
  • Police States, Anthropology and Human Rights NANDINI SUNDAR
    Afraid Atlas / 149 Police States, Anthropology and Human Rights NANDINI SUNDAR 3 January 2010 Ujjwal Kumar Singh, Professor of Political Science, Delhi University, and I have just returned (1 January 2010) from a visit to the police state of Chhattisgarh. Ujjwal had gone for research, and I had gone for a combination of research and verification purposes to assess the livelihood situation of villagers for our case before the Supreme Court,1 both entirely legitimate activities. Indeed, to restrain a petitioner or witness from ensuring compliance with the Court’s orders amounts to contempt of court. In Dantewada, we had checked into Hotel Madhuban on 29 December at around 2 p.m. without any problems, only to be told later that night that the management required the entire hotel to be instantly emptied because they were doing some puja (prayer ceremony) to mark the death anniversary of the hotel owner. We refused to leave at night, and were told we would have to leave at 6 a.m. instead because the rooms had to be cleaned. As expected, other guests checked in the next morning, puja notwithstanding. At Sukma, we were detained by the police and Special Police Officers (SPOs) at the entrance to the town from about 7.30 till 10 p.m., with no explanation for why they had stopped us, and no questions as to why we were there or what our plans were. We were denied lodging – all the hotel owners had been told to claim they were full and refuse us rooms, and the Forest and Public Works departments had been advised not to make their guesthouses available, since ‘Naxalites’ were coming to stay.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Lines Police Station, Raipur Chhattisgarh
    CIVIL LINES POLICE STATION, RAIPUR CHHATTISGARH ...pages from a diary Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative The Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI) is an independent, non-partisan, international non- governmental organisation, mandated to ensure the practical realisation of human rights in the countries of the Commonwealth. In 1987, several Commonwealth professional associations founded CHRI. They believed that while the Commonwealth provided member countries a shared set of values and legal principles from which to work and provided a forum within which to promote human rights, there was little focus on the issues of human rights within the Commonwealth. The objectives of CHRI are to promote awareness of and adherence to the Commonwealth Harare Principles, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other internationally recognised human rights instruments, as well as domestic instruments supporting human rights in Commonwealth member states. Through its reports and periodic investigations, CHRI continually draws attention to progress and setbacks to human rights in Commonwealth countries. In advocating for approaches and measures to prevent human rights abuses, CHRI addresses the Commonwealth Secretariat, member governments and civil society associations. Through its public education programmes, policy dialogues, comparative research, advocacy and networking, CHRI’s approach throughout is to act as a catalyst around its priority issues. The nature of CHRI’s sponsoring organisations allows for a national presence and an international network.* These professionals can also steer public policy by incorporating human rights norms into their own work and act as a conduit to disseminate human rights information, standards and practices. These groups also bring local knowledge, can access policy makers, highlight issues, and act in concert to promote human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Exercising Their Rights, in Particular, Sexual and  in June, Mako Tabuni, a Papuan Political Activist and Reproductive Rights
    In March and April, at least 10 people were injured Freedom of expression when police used excessive force to evict slum-dwellers The authorities used overbroad and imprecise laws to from Nonadonga area, Kolkata, in a bid to acquire land arrest at least seven people for posting online for urban infrastructure projects. comments criticizing the government. In September, one protester was killed by police and In April, Kolkata police arrested academic Ambikesh more than 60 others were injured when police cleared a Mahapatra for posting a cartoon criticizing West Bengal demonstration against the Kudankulam nuclear power Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee. plant in Tamil Nadu. In September, Mumbai police arrested Aseem In November, one person was killed and five others Trivedi for publishing a series of cartoons parodying were injured by police during protests over the amount India’s national symbols as part of an anti-corruption of compensation for land in Loba village, West Bengal, protest. acquired for a private coal mine. In October, Puducherry police arrested Ravi Srinivasan for tweeting about allegations of corruption Sedition laws involving the Union Finance Minister’s son. Protests grew against archaic sedition laws used to In November, Mumbai police arrested two women, imprison peaceful demonstrators. Shaheen Dhada and Renu Srinivasan, for posting Over 50 peaceful protesters against the Kudankulam Facebook comments questioning a public protest nuclear power plant, including Dr Udayakumar and called for by supporters of a recently deceased senior Pushparayan, were charged with sedition and “waging political figure. war against the state”. In August, social activists Seema Azad and Vishwa Amnesty International visits/reports Vijay, were released on bail by the Allahabad High Human rights defenders in India need effective protection: Amnesty Court while appealing against their conviction on International’s written statement to the 19th session of the UN Human sedition charges for collaborating with armed Maoists.
    [Show full text]