DOCSLIB.ORG

Due Diligence Report 26Th of May 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Due Diligence Report 26Th of May 2021 SSCI At-Sea Operations Scope – Due Diligence Report 26th of May 2021 THE CONSUMER GOODS FORUM Sustainable Supply Chain Initiative | At-Sea Operations Scope – Social and Scheme Management Criteria | Comments Received from Stakeholders – Due Diligence Report | 26th of May 2021 SSCI-GSSI Joint Development Reflecting Stakeholder Engagement of July – September 2020 & January – February 20201 Last updated 05 March 2021 1 The Consumer Goods Forum SSCI At-Sea Operations Scope – Due Diligence Report 26th of May 2021 Contents: Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 8 1. Section 1: Overarching Comments ................................................................................................ 9 a) Scheme Management ............................................................................................................... 9 Auditor Competence ..................................................................................................................... 9 Audit Sampling ............................................................................................................................ 10 b) Social Criteria ........................................................................................................................... 11 Applicability of scope: additional risk-based requirements ........................................................ 11 Applicability of scope: exclusion of small-scale fisheries, need for greater flexibility ................ 12 Unclear language or application.................................................................................................. 14 Illiteracy / Language requirements ............................................................................................. 15 Reliance on national laws ............................................................................................................ 15 Reference to ILO C188 ................................................................................................................. 16 Debt Bondage .............................................................................................................................. 17 Migrant workers .......................................................................................................................... 17 Repatriation ................................................................................................................................. 18 OHS coverage .............................................................................................................................. 18 Missing topics .............................................................................................................................. 19 c) Approach ................................................................................................................................. 20 Based on “do no harm” instead of “do good” ............................................................................. 20 Definition of social issues and ASO scope ................................................................................... 21 2. Section 2: Comment per criterion ............................................................................................... 23 a) Scheme Management ............................................................................................................. 23 Chapter 4: Audit Protocol ............................................................................................................ 23 b) Social Criteria ........................................................................................................................... 27 Chapter 1: Management System ................................................................................................. 27 Chapter 2: Legislation .................................................................................................................. 36 Chapter 3: Freely Chosen Employment ....................................................................................... 40 Chapter 4: Minimum Age ............................................................................................................ 65 Chapter 5: Freedom of Association ............................................................................................. 74 Chapter 6: Worker Remuneration ............................................................................................... 80 Chapter 7: Work and Rest Periods .............................................................................................. 85 2 The Consumer Goods Forum SSCI At-Sea Operations Scope – Due Diligence Report 26th of May 2021 Chapter 8: Fair Treatment of Workers ........................................................................................ 88 Chapter 9: Grievance Mechanism ............................................................................................... 91 Chapter 10: Occupational Health and Safety .............................................................................. 95 Chapter 11: Emergency Preparedness ...................................................................................... 111 Chapter 12: Business Ethics ....................................................................................................... 115 3. Section 3: Annexes .................................................................................................................... 118 Public Consultation .................................................................................................................... 118 Stakeholder Meetings ............................................................................................................... 118 Expert Consultations ................................................................................................................. 118 3 The Consumer Goods Forum SSCI At-Sea Operations Scope – Due Diligence Report 26th of May 2021 SSCI- GSSI Team and Technical Working Group TWG/Development lead: Jodie Kuntzsch (Independent Consultant) SSCI representative: Thomas van Haaren (Senior Manager) Sairindri Christisabrina (Coordinator) GSSI representative: Eva van Heukelom (Technical Manager) Technical Working Group Members Audun Lem / Mariana Toussaint UN Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) Elena Finkbeiner Conservation International Sevaly Sen Fisheries Research Development Corporation (FRDC) Ernesto Godelman CeDePesca Yumi Kawashima AEON Prad Kerdpairoj Thai Union Stefanie Moreland Trident Mike Kraft Bumble Bee Stephan Fisher SeaDelight Anne Vanderhoeven Actic Storm Ashton Meier Pacific Seafood Axel Fridriksson BRIM Niklas Wehner Aldi South Expert Consultations Birgitte Poulsen Consultant (Seafood Slavery Risk Tool) Matt Tinning At-Sea Processors Angel Matamoro Irago & Miguel Nueva Pescanova Angel Tordesillas Marcelo Hidalgo Onboard Social Accountability (OSA) Juno Fitzpatrick & Alejandro Conservation International Garcia Lozano 4 The Consumer Goods Forum SSCI At-Sea Operations Scope – Due Diligence Report 26th of May 2021 Ally Dingwall & Abi Rushton Sainsbury’s Randi Ponce Kroger Mariah Boyle Conservation Alliance for Seafood Solutions (CASS) Julio Moron & team OPAGAC / AENOR Hector Martín Férnandez Bolton Foods Alvarez & team Borja Alonso ALBACORA Public Consultation Waitrose Retailer Co-op Retailer Aldi South Retailer Oxfam NGO Conservation International NGO FishWise NGO Association of Sustainable NGO Fisheries Stockholm Water House (SIWI) NGO Marine Stewardship Council Scheme owner (MSC) Fair Trade USA (FTUSA) Scheme owner Global Seafood Scheme owner Assurances/Global Aquaculture Alliance GIZ Government Agency Green Leave, Green Life (GLGL) Consultancy MRAG Consultancy UL Service Provider Hilton Food Group Food producer Alaska Fisheries Development Organization (AFDF) Scheme Owner Meeting 5 The Consumer Goods Forum SSCI At-Sea Operations Scope – Due Diligence Report 26th of May 2021 Virginie Chouzenoux AIM-Progress Jeff Regnart Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute Raquel Seroa da Motta amfori Yakut Oktay amfori Anna Stancher amfori Juliana Herrera Fair Trade USA Avery Siciliano Global Aquaculture Alliance (GAA) Dan Lee Global Aquaculture Alliance (GAA) Katy Hladaki Global Seafood Assurances (GSA) Nolan Quiros GlobalGAP Oluyemisi Oloruntuyi Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Sonia Slavinski Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Leah Buckley Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Michael Bacon Responsible Fishing Scheme (RFS) Mike Platt Responsible Fishing Scheme (RFS) Rochelle Zaid Social Accountability International John Brookes Social Accountability International Retailers Meeting Leon Mol Ahold Delhaize Christian Haller ALDI Nord Petra Stabauer ALDI South Group Niklas Wehner ALDI South Group Eric Lemercier European Market Distribution Rita de Brito Martins Jerónimo Martins Randi Ponce Kroger Veronika Pountcheva METRO AG Joe Prosho Morrisons Morrisons Ally Dingwall Sainsbury’s Abi Rushton Sainsbury’s Huynh Thi Cam Hang Tan Viet International 6 The Consumer Goods Forum SSCI At-Sea Operations Scope – Due Diligence Report 26th of May 2021 Andy Hickman Tesco NGO/Human Right Experts Meeting Dominic Thomson Environmental Justice Foundation Garrett Okrasinski FishWise Jen Cole FishWise Annika Mackensen GIZ Daniel Murphy Impactt Ltd Aurora Oberg Makaira Advising Henk Peters Oxfam Rapatsa Trirath Oxfam Michael Bacon Seafish Siti Masithah STF Corey
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report Name:Retail Foods Bulgaria
    Voluntary Report – Voluntary - Public Distribution Date: March 20,2020 Report Number: BU2020-0011 Report Name: Retail Foods Bulgaria Country: Bulgaria Post: Sofia Report Category: Retail Foods Prepared By: Alexander Todorov Approved By: Jonn Slette Report Highlights: Consistent growth in Bulgaria’s food and beverage retail market is driven by increased consumer confidence, declining unemployment, and growing incomes. The total number of retail outlets in Bulgaria in 2019 was 41,306. Modern retail food and beverage sales in 2019 grew by nearly five percent over 2018, and accounted for 55 percent of total food retail in value terms. U.S. exports with strong sales potential in Bulgaria’s food and beverage retail sector are distilled spirits, tree nuts, dried fruits, wine, snacks and cereals, beef meat, fish and seafood, sauces, spices, and pulses. THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Market Fact Sheet: Bulgaria Executive Summary Since 2016, annual Bulgarian GDP growth has Food Retail Industry been over three percent. Exports generate Bulgarian food retail sales reached $6.85 billion in almost 49 percent of Bulgaria’s GDP and are a pillar 2019. Modern retail sales accounted for of the economy. EU Member States are Bulgaria’s $3.77 billion (55 percent) and $3.08 billion in primary trading partners, although there is wide traditional channel. Total retail outlets were 41,306. variation in the balances of trade. In 2019, Bulgaria Food and beverage retail grew in 2019 on improved had a trade deficit in goods of about €1.72 billion consumer confidence and a better labor market.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Vs. Local-The Hungarian Retail Wars
    Journal of Business and Retail Management Research (JBRMR) October 2015 Global Vs. Local-The Hungarian Retail Wars Charles S. Mayer Reza M. Bakhshandeh Central European University, Budapest, Hungary Key Words MNE’s, SME’s, Hungary, FMCG Retailing, Cooperatives, Rivalry Abstract In this paper we explore the impact of the ivasion of large global retailers into the Hungarian FMCG space. As well as giving the historical evolution of the market, we also show a recipe on how the local SME’s can cope with the foreign competition. “If you can’t beat them, at least emulate them well.” 1. Introduction Our research started with a casual observation. There seemed to be too many FMCG (Fast Moving Consumer Goods) stores in Hungary, compared to the population size, and the purchasing power. What was the reason for this proliferation, and what outcomes could be expected from it? Would the winners necessarily be the MNE’s, and the losers the local SME’S? These were the questions that focused our research for this paper. With the opening of the CEE to the West, large multinational retailers moved quickly into the region. This was particularly true for the extended food retailing sector (FMCG’s). Hungary, being very central, and having had good economic relations with the West in the past, was one of the more attractive markets to enter. We will follow the entry of one such multinational, Delhaize (Match), in detail. At the same time, we will note how two independent local chains, CBA and COOP were able to respond to the threat of the invasion of the multinationals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Abuse of Supermarket Buyers
    The Abuse of Supermarket Buyer Power in the EU Food Retail Sector Preliminary Survey of Evidence Myriam Vander Stichele, SOMO & Bob Young, Europe Economics On behalf of: AAI- Agribusiness Accountability Initiative Amsterdam, March 2009 Colophon The Abuse of Supermarket Buyer Power in the EU Food Retail Sector Preliminary Survey of Evidence Myriam Vander Stichele (SOMO) & Bob Young (Europe Economics) March 2009 Funding: This publication is made possible with funding from The Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs via SOMO and DGOS (Belgian Directorate General for Development Cooperation) via Vredeseilanden (VECO). Published by: AAI - Agribusiness Action Initiatives, formerly called Agribusiness Accountability Initiative The authors can be contacted at: SOMO Sarphatistraat 30 1018 GL Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel: + 31 (20) 6391291 Fax: + 31 (20) 6391321 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.somo.nl This document is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivateWorks 2.5 License. The Abuse of Supermarket Buyer Power in the EU Food Retail Sector 2 Contents Contents ..........................................................................................................................3 Summary .........................................................................................................................4 Introduction.....................................................................................................................6 1. Abusive buyer power problems are being discussed in many fora while a comprehensive
    [Show full text]
  • Retail of Food Products in the Baltic States
    RETAIL OF FOOD PRODUCTS IN THE BALTIC STATES FLANDERS INVESTMENT & TRADE MARKET SURVEY Retail of food products in the Baltic States December 2019 Flanders Investment & Trade Vilnius Retail of Food Products in the Baltic States| December 2019 1 Content Executive summary ................................................................................................................................. 3 Overview of the consumption market Baltic States ................................................................................ 4 Economic forecasts for the Baltic States ............................................................................................. 4 Lithuania .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Latvia ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Estonia ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Structure of distribution and market entry in the Baltic States ............................................................ 13 Structure ............................................................................................................................................ 13 Market entry ..................................................................................................................................... 14 Key
    [Show full text]
  • Groupe Auchan / Magyar Hipermarket Regulation (Ec)
    EN Case No COMP/M.6506 - GROUPE AUCHAN / MAGYAR HIPERMARKET Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/04/2012 In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32012M6506 Office for Publications of the European Union L-2985 Luxembourg EUROPEAN COMMISSION In the published version of this decision, some Brussels, 18.04.2012 information has been omitted pursuant to Article C(2012) 2682 17(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and other confidential information. The omissions are PUBLIC VERSION shown thus […]. Where possible the information omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a general description. MERGER PROCEDURE To the notifying party: Dear Sir/Madam, Subject: Case No COMP/M.6506 - GROUPE AUCHAN / MAGYAR HIPERMARKET Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 139/20041 1. On 9 March 2012, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which Auchan Magyarország Kft (Hungary), belonging to the Groupe Auchan SA ("Auchan", France) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of Magyar Hipermarket Kereskedelmi Kft. ("Magyar Hipermarket", Hungary) by way of purchase of shares.2 Auchan is designated hereinafter as the "Notifying Party", Auchan and Magyar Hipermarket together as the "Parties". 1 OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market".
    [Show full text]
  • Private Equity Confindence Survrey
    Healthy appetite Private Equity Confidence Survey Central Europe December 2017 Healthy appetite | Private Equity Confidence Survey Central Europe This publication contains general information only. The publication has been prepared on the basis of information and forecasts in the public domain. None of the information on which the publication is based has been independently verified by Deloitte and none of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, any of its member firms or any of the foregoing’s affiliates (collectively the “Deloitte Network”) take any responsibility for the content thereof. No entity in the Deloitte Network nor any of their affiliates nor their respective members, directors, employees and agents accept any liability with respect to the accuracy or completeness, or in relation to the use by any recipient, of the information, projections or opinions contained in the publication and no entity in Deloitte Network shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies thereon. 02 Healthy appetite | Private Equity Confidence Survey Central Europe Introduction What a difference a year makes. Last autumn In many ways then, the temperature in the world was reacting to the surprise EU the market now is similar to that of ten years Referendum result, with many investors ago, particularly when it comes to debt. becoming defensive almost overnight. Our European leveraged loan volumes reached Central European (CE) private equity (PE) €58bn for H1 2017, up 1.9x on the same Confidence Survey reflected this. Now, with period in 2016, according to a report by an incredible first three quarters of the year Marlborough Partners1. It may be that frothy and a hat-trick of headline-grabbing exits leverage markets seen in Western Europe casting a positive light on the region’s ability are making their way East, and with froth to deliver returns, deal-doers are confident, comes downward pricing pressure on capital with the Index increasing markedly to 130 in as lenders vie to win deals, making deal our latest survey.
    [Show full text]
  • High Court Judgment Template
    Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 3047 (Comm) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. 2015-000471 BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION COMMERCIAL COURT Royal Courts of Justice, Rolls Building Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL Date: 30 November 2017 Before : MR JUSTICE PHILLIPS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : SAINSBURY’S SUPERMARKETS LTD Claimant - and - (1) VISA EUROPE SERVICES LLC (2) VISA EUROPE LTD (3) VISA UK LTD Defendants - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mark Brealey QC, Derek Spitz and Sarah Love (instructed by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius UK LLP) for the Claimant Dinah Rose QC, Daniel Jowell QC, Brian Kennelly QC, Daniel Piccinin and Jason Pobjoy (instructed by Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy LLP and Linklaters LLP) for the Defendants Hearing dates: 14-17, 21-24 and 28-30 November, 1, 6-9, 12-15 and 19-21 December 2016; 11- 13, 16-19 and 23-25 January; 1, 22-24 and 27-28 February and 1 March 2017 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Approved Judgment ............................. MR JUSTICE PHILLIPS Sainsbury’s v Visa & others Approved Judgment Mr Justice Phillips : INTRODUCTION 1. The claimant (“Sainsbury’s”) operates a supermarket business, selling predominantly food, household goods and fuel. Sainsbury’s accepts payment from customers by way of debit and credit cards, including Visa-branded payment cards. Those cards are issued to the customers by banks and other financial institutions (each an “Issuer”) under licence from the defendants (collectively “Visa”) and governed by the regulations of the Visa Europe System (“the Scheme”), of which each Issuer is a member. 2. Sainsbury’s, in common with all other merchants accepting Visa payment cards (“Merchants”), accepts those cards pursuant to an agreement with an “Acquirer”, also a bank or financial institution belonging to the Scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Community Benefits Agreements: Equitable Development, Social Justice and Other Considerations for Developers, Municipalities and Community Organizations
    UCLA UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy Title Understanding Community Benefits Agreements: Equitable Development, Social Justice and Other Considerations for Developers, Municipalities and Community Organizations Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8c41d4tj Journal UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 26(2) Authors Salkin, Patricia E. Lavine, Amy Publication Date 2008 DOI 10.5070/L5262019560 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Understanding Community Benefits Agreements: Equitable Development, Social Justice and Other Considerations for Developers, Municipalities and Community Organizationsi PatriciaE. Salkin and Amy Lavine* I. INTRODUCTION ...................................... 292 II. WHAT ARE COMMUNITY BENEFITS AGREEMENTS?.. 293 III. ACCOUNTING FOR THE GROWING INTEREST IN COMMUNITY BENEFIT AGREEMENTS ................ 296 IV. EXAMPLES OF CBAS ................................. 300 A . California ...................................... 300 1. Hollywood and Highland Center (Los A ngeles, 1998) ............................. 301 2. Staples Center (Los Angeles, 2001) ........ 302 3. LAX Expansion (Los Angeles, 2004) ...... 304 4. Ballpark Village (San Diego, 2005) ........ 306 5. Other California CBAs .................... 307 B. New York City ................................. 308 1. Atlantic Yards ................. .. ...... 309 2. Columbia University Expansion ........... 314 C. Other Notable CBAs ........................... 317 V. PRACTICAL PROBLEMS WITH
    [Show full text]
  • “The SME's Fight Back: Or David Can Win If He Has Big Enough Stones”
    “The SME’s fight back: or David can win if he has big enough stones” AUTHORS Charles S. Mayer M. Reza Bakshandeh ARTICLE INFO Charles S. Mayer and M. Reza Bakshandeh (2014). The SME’s fight back: or David can win if he has big enough stones. Innovative Marketing , 10(1) RELEASED ON Thursday, 03 April 2014 JOURNAL "Innovative Marketing " FOUNDER LLC “Consulting Publishing Company “Business Perspectives” NUMBER OF REFERENCES NUMBER OF FIGURES NUMBER OF TABLES 0 0 0 © The author(s) 2021. This publication is an open access article. businessperspectives.org Innovative Marketing, Volume 10, Issue 1, 2014 Charles S. Mayer (Hungary), M. Reza Bakshandeh (Hungary) The SME’s fight back: or David can win if he has big enough stones Abstract This paper describes how two local Hungarian retail cooperatives, made up of SME’s, have been able to capture a large market share, and put sufficient pressure on a major Belgian multinational, the Louis Delhaize Group, to withdraw from the market. While clearly other factors were also at work in the disenchantment of Delhaize, leading to its withdrawal from Hungary, the case study gives a recipe for the survival of local SME’s facing a frontal attack by MNEs. Two different business models are described. Keywords: SME’s, underdogs, MNE’s, Hungary, retail competition, cooperatives. Introduction In 1999, the Delhaize group acquired one of the early entrants into Hungary, the Julius Meinl group of In December 2011, Belgian-based Louis Delhaize Austria. Julius Meinl consisted of 4 chains (Julius Group, which owned the Match, Cora and Profi Meinl, Jeee Diszkont, Jeee C+C, and Alfa), chains in Hungary, announced that it will cease all consisting of approximately 160 stores and 25 its activities, and exit the Hungarian market [15].
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018 02
    LeadingAnnual Report Together 2018 Who we are Business review Governance Performance: Financial Performance: Sustainability Investors Ahold Delhaize Annual Report 2018 02 In this year’s report 03 Message from our CEO Business review Governance Performance Investors 06 Group highlights 31 Group key indicators 53 Our Management Board 234 Share performance and Executive Committee Financial Sustainability 32 Group financial review 89 Consolidated income 215 Introduction 235 Shareholder returns 55 Our Supervisory Board 47 Group sustainability statement 218 Progress towards 2020 236 Key dates Who we are performance review 57 Corporate governance 08 Where we operate 90 Consolidated statement 220 Sustainable Retailing data 237 Shareholder structure 50 Definitions: Performance 63 Supervisory Board report of comprehensive income 10 Market overview 226 Definitions 238 Five-year overview measures 70 Remuneration 91 Consolidated balance 12 Our stakeholders 230 240 Contact information sheet Assurance report of the 14 Our role in the value chain 77 How we manage risk independent auditor 241 Cautionary notice 92 Consolidated statement 86 Declarations 15 Our Leading Together of changes in equity strategy 93 Consolidated statement 16 Our business model of cash flows 17 Our promises 94 Notes to the consolidated 18 Our growth drivers financial statements 20 Our response to 190 Parent company stakeholder needs financial statements 192 Notes to the parent company financial statements 202 Other information For more information visit our website at www.aholddelhaize.com Who we are Business review Governance Performance: Financial Performance: Sustainability Investors Ahold Delhaize Annual Report 2018 03 Message from our CEO While we completed the merger and Our strong results underscore that delivered the synergies we promised, we have Ahold Delhaize is well-positioned to succeed.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria: Retail Market Update
    THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Voluntary - Public Date: 5/18/2015 GAIN Report Number: BU1516 Bulgaria Post: Sofia Retail Market Update Report Categories: Retail Foods Market Development Reports Approved By: Russell J. Nicely, Agricultural Attaché Prepared By: Alexander Todorov, Marketing Assistant Report Highlights: This report contains information about Bulgaria’s retail food and beverage market. General Information Currently the number of modern grocery outlets in Bulgaria stands at nearly 3,900, which represents about 11% of total grocery retail outlets. According to one of the leading market research companies (iCAP), the leading top 50 retailers currently hold a combined market share of 46% which is likely to reach 50% in 2015 and close to 55% in 2016. The remaining 54% is held by almost 31,000 traditional grocery stores throughout the country. Retail chains operating in Bulgaria will continue to open new outlets. The latest retail survey made and published in the economic analyses section of a respected Bulgarian media outlet (Capital) shows that retail companies will continue to optimize their networks and close loss-making outlets. Discounters will see the most dynamic market growth. With the deepening of the economic crisis in 2012/2013 and reduced consumer purchasing power, tensions between local food suppliers and retailers intensified. The government drafted new legislation to regulate relations between food manufacturers and retailers, providing more favorable treatment for the first ones. The legislation was vetoed by the President at the second Parliament vote and never went into force.
    [Show full text]
  • The Top 11 Fmcg Retailers in Hungary
    TRADE MAGAZIN – THE 2020 RETAILER RANKING THE TOP 11 FMCG RETAILERS IN HUNGARY Total gross sales: Total gross sales: Total gross sales: Number Change Number Change Number Change billion HUF million EUR billion HUF million EUR billion HUF million EUR Store type: of stores in store Retailer’s name: Store type: of stores in store Retailer’s name: Store type: of stores in store Retailer’s name: in 2020: number 2019 2020 in 2020: number 2019 2020 in 2020: number 2019 2020 1. LIDL 685.0 823.7* 4. COOP 643.0 654.0 7. AUCHAN 394.9 422.5 D 186 LIDL € 2015.4 € 2281.7* Total 4063 € 1945.4 € 1791.1 Total 24 – € 1194.8 € 1157.1 SZM 303 SZUPER HM 19 AUCHAN 2. SPAR 679.6 738.9 ÉB 1043 MINI SZM 3 AUCHAN Total 588 € 2056.0 € 2023.6 ÉB 900 ABC HM 34 INTERSPAR ÉB 1780 NON-COOP STORE NSZM 2 AUCHAN SZM 324 SPAR C+C 37 ADU 8. 326,8 SZM 23 CITY SPAR PENNY MARKET 372.9 5. CBA 538.0 542.0 NK 30 SPAR PARTNER D 226 PENNY MARKET € 988.7 € 1021.4 Total 1987 € 1627.7 € 1484.4 NK 58 SPAR MARKET NSZM 12 PRÍMA 9. 300.0* 34 SPAR DESPAR 357.0* NK SZM, ÉB 918 CBA, PRÍMA, CBA CENT ALDI D 147 ALDI € 907.7* NK 85 SPAR EXPRESS ÉB 1057 CBA, CÉL, CBA PARTNER € 977.7* 3. 736.0 6. 426.9* 10. 112,1 TESCO 737.5* REÁL 428.0* DM 122.0 Total 201 € 2165.5 € 2042.9* Total 1189** € 1291.6* € 1172.2* DR 262 DM € 335.0 € 334.5 REÁL ÉLELMISZER, HM 112 TESCO 388 SZM, C+C REÁL PRÉMIUM, REÁL C+C TESCO SZUPERMARKET, SZM 35 NSZM 1 REÁL ALFA 11.
    [Show full text]