Newsletter No 252 January 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Newsletter No 252 January 2019 Published by RUGBY NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY www.rugbynaturalhistory.org.uk PRESIDENT – Dr P Reeve Newsletter No 252 January 2019 Contents this edition ~ Spring indoor meetings: programme ~Waste reduction appeal ~Unusual sightings ~Photographic competition report ~Membership renewal ~AGM reminder ~Summer field visit report ~Data protection information ~Indoor meeting reports ~Current committee members ~Annual dinner invitation Appendix included in email version: species list for Coombe Abbey Country Park fungal foray Attached separately: annual dinner choice/booking form; AGM Agenda; committee nomination form Mayfly at Upton House. © Dave Champion Winner of the RNHS 2018 photographic competition. 1 Spring programme Now, surely you’ve finally got your 2019 diary, so don’t forget to put in the Thursday evening indoor meeting dates for the rest of the term. Here they are..... 2019 January 10, Tricia Scott (Warwickshire Bat Group), Ecology and Conservation UK of Bats January 24, Scott Hackett, Temple Balsall and Cuttle Pool Nature Reserve February 7, Dr Chris Leach, Change perspectives of galls and their communities February 21, AGM, followed by a quiz (this year set by Janice Tolley-Hodges and Paul Hodges) March 7, Fern Hodges and Tony Landless, UK Wildlife Cruise March 21, Annual dinner, Badger’s Tea Room (with raffle - tickets will be available in advance) (see below for how to book) Where do frogs fly flags? From tadpoles. ©* Unusual sightings Regulars at indoor meetings will know that we have a recent sightings “shout out” early in each one. Here are some examples. At an October meeting it was reported by David Long that gamochaeta pensylvanica (a species normally found in the USA - Pennsylvania cudweed) had appeared by Kwik Fit in Rugby - the council had since sprayed it.... David and others also reported a large number of bee orchid spikes at a surprising location in Rugby. As this newsletter is posted to society’s website (ie open to anyone on the internet), the location will not be revealed here (but ask David). Graham Robson reported that little owls had returned to his farm, then told us about a rook with white wing bars in Dunchurch (leucism, the group commented). We heard from Bernard Scott that red kites were getting in on the act at the Cotswold Falconry at Batsford. (See also Mark Slater’s talk report below.) In mid November we agreed that the fieldfare had arrived. Do let the editor know whether (or not) you’d like this mini-feature to have a regular spot in the newsletter – presumably it would be of most interest to those who hadn’t been able to attend meetings. Normally it would be limited to sightings in Warwickshire, or perhaps just Rugby district. (I’ve checked that this would include Marton and Leamington Hastings! Let me know if it doesn’t cover your home patch....) Mark demonstrates an alternative approach below. Membership renewal All that is free of charge to members of the society. Did you remember to renew by the end of December? Oh dear – if not, your membership has officially expired – act now to stick with us. The renewal form was attached to the email bringing the October newsletter. So that you don’t forget again, we’d strongly encourage you to set up a bank standing order for this purpose. That would also be a tremendous help to the treasurer. 2 Summer field visit report Coombe country park The final field visit of the 2018 season was on Saturday 6 October to Coombe (Abbey) country park, where Paul Hodges led a search as part of International Fungal Foray Weekend. His species list, compiled over the Saturday and Sunday (when there was also a guided walk) is in Appendix 1. Seventeen people took part, including three “repeat customers”. What do you call a frog who wants to be a cowboy? Hopalong Cassidy ©* Indoor meeting reports Local biodiversity action plans Paul Hodges opened the season’s programme on 29 September with an explanation of local biodiversity action plans (LBAPs), using case studies of Coombe (Abbey) country park and the old Oxhouse Farm nature reserve (now the Neal Trust SSSI meadow butterfly reserve). Priority habitats considered included reed beds, wet woodlands (alder and willow carrs), wet grasslands, fen and emergent vegetation, acid grassland, neutral grassland, calcareous grassland (Neal Trust SSSI meadow- rheatic lst), rivers and streams, and wood pasture (with veteran trees). Priority species considered included reed buntings (linked to reed-beds, carr, fen and emergent vegetation), snipe (wet grassland, fen and emergent vegetation), sand martins, swifts, otters, pipistrelle, brown long-eared, Daubenton’s and noctule bats, water shrews (reed-beds, fen and emergent vegetation), harvest mice (wet grassland, fen and emergent vegetation), hedgehogs (neutral and wet grassland, hedges and carr), willow tits (willow and alder carr), marsh tits, lesser spotted woodpeckers (carr and wood pasture - veterans), green woodpeckers (neutral grassland and wood pasture), black poplars (populus nigra, var betufolia), small heath butterflies (acid grassland), grizzled skipper butterflies, dingy skipper butterflies, white letter hairstreak butterflies (elms), dark green fritillary butterflies (the Neal Trust Oxhouse reserve), pink balerina waxcap fungi (neutral and acid grasslands), some red data book beetles such as jewel beetles and click beetles (wood pasture) and great crested newts. Paul highlighted the importance of partnership working. Examples were those involved in the Princethorpe Woodlands Living Landscape Project (now Dunsmore Living Landscape Project): Warwickshire Wildlife Trust; Coventry City Council; Warwickshire District Council (Warwickshire Biodiversity Audit Team and Local Biodiversity Action Plan and Warwickshire Biological Records Centre); Warwickshire branch of the Butterfly Conservation Society; Warwickshire Fungus Survey and the Cotswold Fungus Group; the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO); the RSPB; and the Botanical Society of the British Isles (BSBI) Warwickshire Branch (John and Monika Walton). Paul’s conclusions related to the importance of active conservation management tasks to maintain priority habitats at the right stage of natural succession (eg reed beds or grasslands). 3 The effects of Brexit were considered on wildlife and habitat protection – issues included funding for active nature conservation management and surveying and monitoring of priority species and habitats. PH Amphibians and Reptiles in Warwickshire Some thirty plus members were introduced to the world of WART, that is the Warwickshire Amphibian and Reptile Team, by Jan Clemons on the evening of 11 October. Firstly the sightings were called for and griffon vulture, short-toed eagle and black redstart were put forward all being encountered on an Iberian journey. Closer to home brimstone, hobby still active, buzzards and red kites were reported, also forty species of fungi on a foray at Coombe Country Park. The reports concluded with a discussion as to the seemingly lower number of starlings present in the area. So, to herpetology. It was stated that in general the widespread species are becoming much rarer. Frogs and toads were the first subject, the four native species common frog, common toad, natterjack toad and pool frogs being described. Frogs generally have smooth skin, a black patch behind the eye, various colourations and patterns and tend to leap around, whereas toads have rough skin, will stay in the hand if caught and walk or hop. Frog spawn is founds in clumps, toad spawn in strings; as for tadpoles the grey ones are toad, the black ones that gather in shoals are frog. Frogs at the former Central station, Ashlawn Cutting © Dave Poole Next the three species of newt were covered smooth newt, palmate newt and great-crested newt (photo below © Jan Clemons). Smooth newt has smooth skin and a continuous crest, palmate newt has smooth skin, a filament on the tail and a pinkish chin with no spots as compared to the smooth newt. The much larger great-crested newt has warty skin, an indentation in the crest and a white or silvery flash on the tail, and is cast as the scourge of all property developers! 4 What do you say when you “Warts new?” meet a toad? ©* Then to snakes and lizards. The common lizard has a speckled back and orange belly, with the females having a line along the back, and they give birth to live young. They warm up then come out actively hunting - they have the capability to darken the skin to warm up quickly. The sand lizard males have broad heads and green sides, whereas the females are identifiable by their bold eye markings. Slowworms are typically grey or brown with blue spots, only the females have stripes and darker brown sides. They are classed as lizards as they have eyelids and snakes do not, colour variations from yellow, gold and ivory, pink have been noticed. I would imagine most of us have seen a grass snake, fast and alert and an excellent swimmer in the water hunting fish in that familiar serpentine motion. They have distinctive collars of variable colours and are the snakes that can feign death if threatened. Not to be confused with the adder, albeit they often are. The adder (extinct in Warwickshire) has slitted pupils to the eyes whereas the grass snake has round pupils, not that you would want to stare into a snake’s eyes to find out – I recall “Jungle Book” and “Trust in Me”!! Adders only reproduce every two years and are very secretive and masters of camouflage, the prominent zigzag markings always give an adder away. Photo © Jan Clemons: grass snake at Jees silt ponds After introducing us to the various species and their identification traits, Jan described some of the work that WART members do, surveying colonies of great-crested newts, but now the removal of these is done on an area basis which makes it easier for developers to have them removed to special reserves.
Recommended publications
  • TAG Operational Structure
    PARROT TAXON ADVISORY GROUP (TAG) Regional Collection Plan 5th Edition 2020-2025 Sustainability of Parrot Populations in AZA Facilities ...................................................................... 1 Mission/Objectives/Strategies......................................................................................................... 2 TAG Operational Structure .............................................................................................................. 3 Steering Committee .................................................................................................................... 3 TAG Advisors ............................................................................................................................... 4 SSP Coordinators ......................................................................................................................... 5 Hot Topics: TAG Recommendations ................................................................................................ 8 Parrots as Ambassador Animals .................................................................................................. 9 Interactive Aviaries Housing Psittaciformes .............................................................................. 10 Private Aviculture ...................................................................................................................... 13 Communication ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TRAFFIC Bird’S-Eye View: REPORT Lessons from 50 Years of Bird Trade Regulation & Conservation in Amazon Countries
    TRAFFIC Bird’s-eye view: REPORT Lessons from 50 years of bird trade regulation & conservation in Amazon countries DECEMBER 2018 Bernardo Ortiz-von Halle About the author and this study: Bernardo Ortiz-von Halle, a biologist and TRAFFIC REPORT zoologist from the Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia, has more than 30 years of experience in numerous aspects of conservation and its links to development. His decades of work for IUCN - International Union for Conservation of Nature and TRAFFIC TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring in South America have allowed him to network, is a leading non-governmental organization working globally on trade acquire a unique outlook on the mechanisms, in wild animals and plants in the context institutions, stakeholders and challenges facing of both biodiversity conservation and the conservation and sustainable use of species sustainable development. and ecosystems. Developing a critical perspective The views of the authors expressed in this of what works and what doesn’t to achieve lasting conservation goals, publication do not necessarily reflect those Bernardo has put this expertise within an historic framework to interpret of TRAFFIC, WWF, or IUCN. the outcomes of different wildlife policies and actions in South America, Reproduction of material appearing in offering guidance towards solutions that require new ways of looking at this report requires written permission wildlife trade-related problems. Always framing analysis and interpretation from the publisher. in the midst of the socioeconomic and political frameworks of each South The designations of geographical entities in American country and in the region as a whole, this work puts forward this publication, and the presentation of the conclusions and possible solutions to bird trade-related issues that are material, do not imply the expression of any linked to global dynamics, especially those related to wildlife trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Parrots of the Neotropics
    sustain their numbers. Buffon's Macaw: Appendix I. Threatened Parrots Sometimes confused with the Mili­ tary Macaw. See A.F.A. Watchbird Oct/Nov 1986 and Dec/Jan 1990 for ofthe Neotropics clarification. These birds are seri­ by Nigel J. Col/ar ously declining throughout their International Council for Bird Preservation range in Central America. Captive Cambridge, United Kingdom breeding is desperately needed. Green-winged Macaws: Appen­ dix 11. Still being brought into the U.S. Parrots as Problems the deletion of Yellow-sided Parakeet The wild caught birds have proven Parrots are colourful, vegetarian, Pyrrhura hypoxantha (an invalid difficult to breed. Better success is playful and mimetic, so people find species), the relegation of Yellow­ possible utilizing captive bred birds them attractive, easy to keep, com­ faced Amazon Amazona xanthops to for breeding. panionable and entertaining. In popu­ near-threatened status, the promotion Hyacinth Macaws: Appendix I. lar consciousness, they are the most from near-threatened status of White­ Current population is estimated at high-profile of birds, commonly fea­ headed Amazon Amazona leuco­ 2500 to 5000 total population. lllegal tured in advertisements that seek to cephala, and the addition of El Oro trade continues to decimate their assert the tropical authenticity of a Parakeet Pyrrhura orcesi, Fuertes' population. Further captive breeding product, and often humourised in Hapalopsittaca fuertesi and Fire­ is necessary to maintain adequate cartoon form to assure the conviv­ eyed Parrots H. pyrrhops, Blue­ amounts ofbirds. iality of and complicity in the experi­ cheeked Amazona dufresniana and Military Macaws: Appendix I. ence the product offers. Alder Amazons A.
    [Show full text]
  • According to Dictionary
    Extinction: The Parrots We’ve Lost By Desi Milpacher The definition of extinction is “the act or process of becoming extinct; a coming to an end or dying out: the extinction of a species.” Once extinction has been determined, there is usually no chance of a species recurring in a given ecosystem. In mankind’s active history of exploration, exploitation and settlement of new worlds, there has been much loss of natural resources. Parrots have suffered tremendously in this, with over twenty species having been permanently lost. And there are many more that are teetering on the edge, towards the interminable abyss. In this article we find out what happened to these lost treasures, learn which ones are currently being lost, and why this is important to our world. The Old and New Worlds and Their Lost Parrots Little is known of the natural history of most of the world’s extinct parrots, mainly because they disappeared before in-depth studies were conducted on them. It is generally believed, save the Central American macaws which were least known, that most fed on diets similar to today’s parrots (leaves, blossoms, seeds, nuts and fruits), frequented heavy forested areas and nested mainly in tree cavities. A number could not fly well, or were exceptionally tame, leading to their easy capture. Nearly all of these natural treasures vanished between the 18th and early 20th centuries, and the main reason for their loss was overhunting. Some lesser causes included egg collecting (popular with naturalists in the 19th century), diseases (introduced or endemic), drought, natural disasters, predation by introduced species, and habitat alternation.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions Parrot Species Listed Under The
    Frequently Asked Questions Parrot Species Listed Under the Endangered Species Act TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL FAQs .......................................................................................................................... 2 GENERAL FAQs ABOUT PARROTS ...................................................................................... 4 FAQs FOR PARROTS LISTED AS THREATENED .............................................................. 5 FAQs FOR PARROTS LISTED AS ENDANGERED .............................................................. 7 PARROT SPECIES LISTED UNDER THE ESA as of 5/9/2014 ........................................... 10 1 GENERAL FAQs What is the process for adding a species to the list of threatened and endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA)? In order for a plant or animal species can receive the protection provided under the ESA, it must be added to the Federal Lists of Threatened and Endangered Wildlife and Plants. A species is added to the list when it is determined to be endangered or threatened because of any of the following factors: a) the present or threatened destruction, modification or curtailment of its habitat or range; b) overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific or educational purposes; c) disease or predation; d) the inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; or e) other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence. An endangered species is defined as one “in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.” A threatened species is defined as one “likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range.” The process of listing begins in one of two ways: through the petition process or the candidate assessment process. The ESA provides that any interested person may petition the Secretary of the Interior to add a species to, or to remove a species from, the lists of threatened and endangered wildlife and plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Some History, the Current Situation,And Proposals for Its
    Le a r ’s Macaw Some history, the current situation,and A Repor t by MICHAEL REYNOLDS Editor proposals for its preservation Rosemary Low, P.O. Box 100, Mansfield, Notts., Background United Kingdom The World Par rot Trust (WPT) has taken a special NG20 9NZ interest in this species for the last eight years, working with Dr. Charles A. Munn III and his Brazilian associates, notably Dr. Carlos Yamashita CONTENTS and Dr. Pedr o Lima. After attending the important ‘Blue Macaws’ meeting in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, in Lear’s Macaw................2-7 1992, WPT pursued the long-term objective of Inspirational Speakers in gr owing and transplanting Licuri palm trees to boost Tenerife ......................8-9 the food supply for Lear ’s Macaws at their Rasa da Caterina location. A mor e immediate and ur gent The Conservation of requirement was, and remains, to provide adequate African Parrots ......10-12 protection at this first known site to pr event the illegal capture of Lear’s Macaws for collectors within The ‘Pet Bird Report’ Brazil, and also in other countries. Dr. Charles Munn Convention ..................13 A degree of protection has been No.4 November 1995 ‘Lear’s parrot species cur rently under Visit to the Pantanal Area in place for several years, with Macaw: a second population pressure fr om international of Western Brazil ....14-15 guards ar ranged by IBAMA (the confirmed’, and Vol. 9 no.2 May trading activities. official Brazilian conservation 1997 ‘Lear’ s Macaw - next in line Book Review ................16 The confiscation of two young agency), and Biodiversitas, a for extinction?’).
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving the Diversity of Ecological Interactions: the Role of Two Threatened Macaw Species As Legitimate Dispersers of “Megafaunal” Fruits
    diversity Article Conserving the Diversity of Ecological Interactions: The Role of Two Threatened Macaw Species as Legitimate Dispersers of “Megafaunal” Fruits José L. Tella 1,*, Fernando Hiraldo 1, Erica Pacífico 1, José A. Díaz-Luque 2, Francisco V. Dénes 1 , Fernanda M. Fontoura 3,4, Neiva Guedes 3,4 and Guillermo Blanco 5 1 Department of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana, CSIC. Américo Vespucio s/n, E-41092 Sevilla, Spain; [email protected] (F.H.); ericapacifi[email protected] (E.P.); [email protected] (F.V.D.) 2 Foundation for the Research and Conservation of Bolivian Parrots (CLB). Estación Argentina, C/ Fermín Rivero 3460, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia; [email protected] 3 Universidade Anhanguera - Uniderp, Programa de Pós Graduação em Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Regional, Rua Alexandre Herculano, 1400, Bairro Jardim Veraneio, 79037- 280 Campo Grande, Brazil; [email protected] (F.M.F); [email protected] (N.G.) 4 Instituto Arara Azul, Pesquisa em Conservação, Rua Klaus Sthurk, 106, Jardim Mansur, 79051-660 Campo Grande, Brazil 5 Department of Evolutionary Ecology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC. José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 4 January 2020; Accepted: 21 January 2020; Published: 24 January 2020 Abstract: The extinction of ecological functions is increasingly considered a major component of biodiversity loss, given its pervasive effects on ecosystems, and it may precede the disappearance of the species engaged. Dispersal of many large-fruited (>4 cm diameter) plants is thought to have been handicapped after the extinction of megafauna in the Late Pleistocene and the recent defaunation of large mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Richness, Composition and Detectability of Psittacidae (Aves) In
    Revista Chilena de Historia Natural ISSN: 0716-078X [email protected] Sociedad de Biología de Chile Chile RODRIGUES, PATRÍSIA O.; BORGES, MARIANA R.; MELO, CELINE Richness, composition and detectability of Psittacidae (Aves) in three palm swamps of the Cerrado sensu lato in central Brazil Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, vol. 85, núm. 2, 2012, pp. 171-178 Sociedad de Biología de Chile Santiago, Chile Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=369944301003 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative PSITTACIDAE IN PALM SWAMPS OF BRAZIL 171 REVISTA CHILENA DE HISTORIA NATURAL Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 85: 171-178, 2012 © Sociedad de Biología de Chile RESEARCH ARTICLE Richness, composition and detectability of Psittacidae (Aves) in three palm swamps of the Cerrado sensu lato in central Brazil Riqueza, composición y detectabilidad de los Psittacidae (Aves) en tres pantanos del Cerrado sensu lato en el Brasil central PATRÍSIA O. RODRIGUES, MARIANA R. BORGES & CELINE MELO* Laboratório de Ornitologia e Bioacústica, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Rua Ceará, s/n, Umuarama, CEP: 38400-902, Uberlândia, Brasil *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT The objectives of this study were: (1) to investigate the richness and composition of the Psittacidae in palm swamps; (2) to determine if the sizes of fl ocks vary seasonally; (3) to compare detectability rates according to species. Psittacid communities were observed from November 2006 to November 2007 in semimonthly visits to the area using fi xed-point observation.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2018-2019 Edition
    BIRDCONSERVATION The Magazine of American Bird Conservancy WINTER 2018-2019 BIRD’S EYE VIEW Scaling Up Migratory Bird ABC is dedicated to conserving birds and their habitats throughout the Americas. With an emphasis on Conservation: A New Approach? achieving results and working in partnership, we take on the greatest hile there is more to be philanthropic or government problems facing birds today, innovating learned about the threats funding to turn the situation and building on rapid advancements facing many species of around. ABC is piloting a program W in science to halt extinctions, protect migratory birds, we already know in Guatemala that provides bridge habitats, eliminate threats, and build Winter 2018-2019 enough to target conservation funding for landowners to move capacity for bird conservation. work in ways that will help some from virtually sterile pasture to of the fastest-declining species. shady, bird-rich chocolate, black BIRDCONSERVATION For example, species such as the pepper, cardamom, and ma- A copy of the current financial statement and Wood Thrush and Long-billed hogany plantations — in places registration filed by the organization may be obtained by contacting: ABC, P.O. Box 249, Curlew face habitat loss and that provide excellent habitat for The Plains, VA 20198. 540-253-5780, or by 12 New Reserve Is a Rare Macaw’s degradation on both breeding long-distance migrants such as the contacting the following state agencies: and wintering grounds, across Wood Thrush. Florida: Division of Consumer Services, Promising Nest Egg large areas of habitat. toll-free number within the state: By piloting test projects like this, 800-435-7352.
    [Show full text]
  • ARKANSAS REGISTER Proposed Rule Cover Sheet
    ARKANSAS REGISTER Proposed Rule Cover Sheet Secretary of State John Thurston 500 Woodlane, Suite 026 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1094 (501) 682-5070 www.sos.arkansas.gov Name of Department Legal Division Agency or Division Name Arkansas Game & Fish Commission Other Subdivision or Department, If Applicable Previous Agency Name, If Applicable Contact Person April M. Soman Contact E-mail [email protected] Contact Phone 501-223-6327 Name of Rule _____ R1.01 – Unrestricted Captive Wildlife Species List____________________________________ Newspaper Name Arkansas Democrat Gazette Date of Publishing March 22, 23, and 24, 2020 and April 19, 20, and 21, 2020 Final Date for Public Comment May 21, 2020 Location and Time of Public Meeting AGFC Auditorium, 2 Natural Resources Drive, Little Rock AR 72205, at 10:00 a.m. R1.01 – Unrestricted Captive Wildlife Species List A. The following species are exempt from Codes 09.02 (Possession Of Non-Native Wildlife In Captivity Restricted), 09.07 (Wildlife Breeder/Dealer Permit Required), and 09.10 (Wildlife Importation Permit Required): 1. Buffalo (Bos bison) 2. House mouse (Mus musculus) and Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) 3. Congo peacock (Arfopavo congensis) 4. Coturnix quail (Coturnix spp.) 5. Emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) 6. European domestic ferret (Mustela putorius) 7. Gerbils (Subfamily Gerbillinae) 8. Green peafowl (Pavo muticus) 9. Guinea pig (Cavia porcellus) 10. Hamster (Mesocricetus auratus, Phodopus campbelli, Phodopus sungorus, Cricetulusgriseus, Phodopus roborovskii) 11. Indian Peafowl (Pavo cristatus) 12. Llama (Lama glama) 13. Muscovy duck (Cairina moschata) 14. Ringneck dove (Streptopelia risoria) 15. Wolf/dog hybrids 16. Sugar glider (Petaurus breviceps) 17. Long-tailed chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) 18.
    [Show full text]
  • Captive Wildlife Division 2 Restricted List
    Restricted Listing – Division 2 Animals currently in the province that are listed in Division 2 are not considered overtly dangerous, but pose other risks. They may be held for the remaining life of the animal only if they were in a person’s possession prior to June 1, 2021, and if the ministry is notified by November 30, 2021. Item Class (Common Name) Scientific Name PART 1 AMPHIBIANS (CLASS AMPHIBIA) 1. Family Ambystomatidae Gray Tiger Salamander Ambystoma mavortium diaboli Barred Tiger Salamander Ambystoma mavortium mavortium Eastern Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum 2. Family Bufonidae Canadian Toad Anaxyrus hemiophrys Great Plains Toad Bufo cognatus 3. Family Dendrobatidae Rockstone Poison Dart Frog Dendrobates nubeculosus 4. Family Hylidae Gray Tree Frog Dryophytes versicolor Tiger Leg Frog Pithecopus hypochondrialis Boreal Chorus Frog Pseudacris maculata 5. Family Hynobiidae Tokyo Salamander Hynobius tokyoensis 6. Family Pipidae African Clawed Frog Xenopus laevis 7. Family Ranidae Northern Leopard Frog Lithobates pipiens Wood Frog Lithobates sylvaticus 8. Family Rhacophoridae Flying Foam Nest Frog Polypedates leucomystax Vietnam Flying Frog Rhacophorus calcaneus Item Class (Common Name) Scientific Name Indonesian Flying Frog Rhacophorus reinwardtii Mossy Frog Theloderma bicolor 9. Family Scaphiopodidae Plains Spadefoot Toad Spea bombifrons 10. Family Sirenidae Lesser Siren Siren intermedia Greater Siren Siren lacertina PART 2 BIRDS (CLASS AVES) 1. Family Corvidae American Crow Corvus brachyrhynchos Black-billed Magpie Pica hudsonia 2. Family Icteridae Red-winged Blackbird Agelaius phoeniceus Brewer’s Blackbird Euphagus cyanocephalus Brown-headed Cowbird Molothrus ater Common Grackle Quiscalus quiscula Yellow-headed Blackbird Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus 3. Family Passeridae House Sparrow Passer domesticus 4. Family Phasianidae Cheer Pheasant Catreus wallichii Brown-eared Pheasant Crossoptilon mantchuricum Himalayan Monal Lophophorus impejanus Edwards’s Pheasant Lophura edwardsi Swinhoe’s Pheasant Lophura swinhoii Elliot’s Pheasant Syrmaticus ellioti 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Birds of the Americas
    LEAR'S MACAW Anodorhynchus leari E1 By the time the home of this blue macaw was finally traced in 1978 it numbered only some 60 birds in the wild, restricted to two cliff-nesting colonies in the Raso da Catarina in north-eastern Bahia, Brazil, where without considerable intervention it faces extinction in the fairly near term from the destruction and disturbance of its feeding habitat (licuri palm stands) compounded by hunting for food and for trade. DISTRIBUTION Lear's (or Indigo) Macaw (see Remarks 1) is confined to the middle course of the rio Vaza-Barris south of the Raso da Catarina plateau, north-eastern Bahia, Brazil, in an area of probably no more than 8,000 km2 (see below). However, for more than a century European and American zoos had occasionally received specimens (see Remarks 2) in consignments of Hyacinth Macaws Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus originating from Pará (probably Belém), Bahia (Salvador), Santos and Rio de Janeiro, but the provenance of the rarer, smaller macaws could not be established beyond “probably some part of Brazil” (Salvadori 1891, Astley 1907, Peters 1937). This situation of ignorance prevailed until Pinto (1950c), visiting Santo Antão municipality in Pernambuco, was shown a captive specimen that had come from Juazeiro, a town on the right bank of the rio São Francisco in Bahia (a locality also noted for Spix's Macaw Cyanopsitta spixii: see relevant account). However, successive expeditions – to north-western Bahia and southern Piauí in 1958 (Pinto and de Camargo 1961), central Goiás in 1956 (Stager 1961), northern Bahia and Ceará in 1964 (Sick et al.
    [Show full text]