DOCSLIB.ORG

SOUTH SUDAN Humanitarian Snapshot April 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SOUTH SUDAN Humanitarian Snapshot April 2020 SOUTH SUDAN Humanitarian Snapshot April 2020 South Sudan confirmed its first COVID-19 case on 5 April. At the end of the month, 35 cases were confirmed. The security and livelihoods. Several factors are expected to worsen humanitarian needs in the country over COVID-19 related measures and travel restrictions affected the movement of people and their access to services, and the coming months, including COVID-19, the desert locust invasion and continued inter-communal impacted humanitarian operations with a temporary suspension of activities and some delays in supply movement. clashes. Fighting between the National Salvation Front, South Sudan People’s Defense Forces and Sudan Simultaneously, due to the in-country and cross-border restrictions, basic commodity prices began to rise, placing People’s Liberation Army-in-Opposition forces in Lainya County, Central Equatoria, affected 30,000 people markets under stress. The urban population, who relied heavily on the markets, were adversely affected. The spread of and displaced 5,700. An additional 7,000 people were displaced by inter-communal fighting in Terekeka COVID-19 in the country will coincide with the lean season, when food insecurity is projected to worsen. A mature County, Central Equatoria. Inter-communal violence and cattle raids in parts of Central and Western swarm of locusts was seen in several locations in Magwi County, Eastern Equatoria, posing further threats to food Equatoria, Jonglei, Unity and Warrap also resulted in civilian displacement and casualties. Some 5,000 spontaneous refugee returns were verified. KEY FIGURES 7.5M 1.67M 190K 2.25M 301K 6.01M 352K 1.3M PEOPLE IN NEED INTERNALLY IDPS IN PROTECTION SOUTH SUDANESE REFUGEES IN SOUTH SEVERELY FOOD INSECURE MALNOURISHED WOMEN MALNOURISHED DISPLACED PEOPLE OF CIVILIANS SITES REFUGEES SUDAN (FEB-APR) (JAN-DEC) CHILDREN (JAN-DEC) DISPLACEMENT AND HOTSPOTS INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL DISPLACEMENT IPC ACUTE FOOD INSECURITY (FEB-APR) IPC Phase xx Estimated number of IDPs Conflict IDPs South Sudanese refugees Catastrophe/ Famine ! PoC site Emergency xx South Sudanese refugees Cattle raid 5M Crisis Stressed SUDAN Refugee location Desert locust infestation 823,344 Minimal 3.92M people displaced PoC site 4M ABYEI REGION ! Upper Nile Internal displacement SUDAN ! Upper 2.25M Northern Bahr el Unity Nile 3M Ghazal Warrap ETHIOPIA ABYEI REGION Western Unity Bahr el ! Jonglei Ghazal 215,888 2M Northern CENTRAL Lakes AFRICAN ! Bahr el Ghazal ETHIOPIA REPUBLIC 247,614 1.67M1.67M 1M Western Eastern 127,035 Equatoria Central Equatoria Warrap Equatoria ! 233,198 DEMOCRATIC KENYA Jonglei 340,517 0 REPUBLIC OF Western Bahr Jan Jul Jan Jul Jan Jul Jan Jul Jan THE CONGO el Ghazal UGANDA Lakes 2016 2016 2017 2017 2018 2018 2019 2019 2020 105,465 196,055 CENTRAL 206,455 IDPs IN PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS SITES STAPLE FOOD PRICE TREND AFRICAN REPUBLIC 600 2,222 Western 500 Equatoria Central Eastern 150 7% 0-4 yr 8% 400 Equatoria Equatoria 64,027 300 61,225 100 22% 5-17 yr 23% 200 3.5 kg of white sorghum 208,853 KENYA South Sudanese Pounds (Juba, Central Equatoria) DEMOCRATIC 22% 18-59 yr 15% South Sudanese pounds 100 REPUBLIC OF 88,612 50 121,476 0 THE CONGO 2% 60+ yr 1% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec UGANDA 880,367 0 2020 2019 Average 2017-2019 The administrative boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Final boundary between the Republic of Sudan and the Republic of South Sudan has not been determined. Final Status of Abyei area is not yet determined. Date: 19 May 2020 | Sources: OCHA, FAO, IOM-DTM, UNHCR, WFP-VAM, IPC TWG, Ministry of Health | [email protected] | unocha.org/south-sudan | reliefweb.int/country/ssd | southsudan.humanitarianresponse.info | reports.unocha.org/south-sudan | @OCHASouthSudan .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan's Equatoria
    SPECIAL REPORT NO. 493 | APRIL 2021 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan’s Equatoria By Alan Boswell Contents Introduction ...................................3 Descent into War ..........................4 Key Actors and Interests ............ 9 Conclusion and Recommendations ...................... 16 Thomas Cirillo, leader of the Equatoria-based National Salvation Front militia, addresses the media in Rome on November 2, 2019. (Photo by Andrew Medichini/AP) Summary • In 2016, South Sudan’s war expand- Equatorians—a collection of diverse South Sudan’s transitional period. ed explosively into the country’s minority ethnic groups—are fighting • On a national level, conflict resolu- southern region, Equatoria, trig- for more autonomy, local or regional, tion should pursue shared sover- gering a major refugee crisis. Even and a remedy to what is perceived eignty among South Sudan’s con- after the 2018 peace deal, parts of as (primarily) Dinka hegemony. stituencies and regions, beyond Equatoria continue to be active hot • Equatorian elites lack the external power sharing among elites. To spots for national conflict. support to viably pursue their ob- resolve underlying grievances, the • The war in Equatoria does not fit jectives through violence. The gov- political process should be expand- neatly into the simplified narratives ernment in Juba, meanwhile, lacks ed to include consultations with of South Sudan’s war as a power the capacity and local legitimacy to local community leaders. The con- struggle for the center; nor will it be definitively stamp out the rebellion. stitutional reform process of South addressed by peacebuilding strate- Both sides should pursue a nego- Sudan’s current transitional period gies built off those precepts.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Mobility Mapping (Pmm) South Sudan: Ebola Virus Disease (Evd) Preparedness
    POPULATION MOBILITY MAPPING (PMM) SOUTH SUDAN: EBOLA VIRUS DISEASE (EVD) PREPAREDNESS CONTEXT The 10th EVD outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is still ongoing, with a total of 3,428 EVD cases reported as of 2 February 2020, including 3,305 confirmed and 118 probable cases. A total of 2,250 deaths have been reported, with a case fatality ratio (CFR) of 65.6%. Although the rate of new cases in DRC has decreased and stabilized, two health zones reported 25 new confirmed cases within the 21-day period from 13 January to 2 February 2019: Beni (n=18) and Mabalako (n=30).1 The EVD outbreak in DRC is the 2nd largest in history and is affecting the north-eastern provinces of the country, which border Uganda, Rwanda and South Sudan. South Sudan, labeled a 'priority 1' preparedness country, has continued to scale up preparedeness efforts since the outbreak was confirmed in Kasese district in South Western Uganda on 11 June 2019 and in Ariwara, DRC (70km from the South Sudan border) on 30 June 2019. South Sudan remains at risk while there is active transmission in DRC, due to cross-border population movements and a weak health system. To support South Sudan’s Ministry of Health and other partners in their planning for EVD preparedness, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) has applied its Population Mobility Mapping (PMM) approach to inform the prioritization of locations for preparedness activities. Aim and Objectives The aim of PMM in South Sudan is to inform the 2020 EVD National Preparedness Plan by providing partners with relevant information on population mobility and cross-border movements.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan Rapid Response Ebola 2019
    RESIDENT/HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR REPORT ON THE USE OF CERF FUNDS YEAR: 2019 RESIDENT/HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR REPORT ON THE USE OF CERF FUNDS SOUTH SUDAN RAPID RESPONSE EBOLA 2019 19-RR-SSD-33820 RESIDENT/HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR ALAIN NOUDÉHOU REPORTING PROCESS AND CONSULTATION SUMMARY a. Please indicate when the After-Action Review (AAR) was conducted and who participated. 10 October 2019 The AAR took place on 10 October 2019, with the participation of WHO, UNICEF, IOM, WFP, and the Ebola Secretariat (EVD Secretariat). b. Please confirm that the Resident Coordinator and/or Humanitarian Coordinator (RC/HC) Report on the Yes No use of CERF funds was discussed in the Humanitarian and/or UN Country Team. The report was not discussed within the Humanitarian Country Team due to time constraints; however, they received a draft of the completed report for their review and comment as of the 25 October 2019. c. Was the final version of the RC/HC Report shared for review with in-country stakeholders (i.e. the CERF recipient agencies and their implementing partners, cluster/sector coordinators and members and relevant Yes No government counterparts)? The final version of the RC/HC report was shared with CERF recipient agencies and their implementing partners, as well as with cluster coordinators and the EVD Secretariat, as of 16 October 2019. 2 PART I Strategic Statement by the Resident/Humanitarian Coordinator South Sudan is considered to be one of the countries neighbouring the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) at highest risk of Ebola importation and transmission. Thanks to the allocation of USD $2.1 million from the Central Emergency Relief Fund Ebola preparedness in South Sudan, including the capacity to detect and respond to Ebola, has been strengthened.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of South Sudan Request for an Extension of the Deadline For
    The Republic of South Sudan Request for an extension of the deadline for completing the destruction of Anti-personnel Mines in mined areas in accordance with Article 5, paragraph 1 of the convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Antipersonnel Mines and on Their Destruction Submitted at the 18th Meeting of the State Parties Submitted to the Chair of the Committee on Article 5 Implementation Date 31 March 2020 Prepared for State Party: South Sudan Contact Person : Jurkuch Barach Jurkuch Position: Chairperson, NMAA Phone : (211)921651088 Email : [email protected] 1 | Page Contents Abbreviations 3 I. Executive Summary 4 II. Detailed Narrative 8 1 Introduction 8 2 Origin of the Article 5 implementation challenge 8 3 Nature and extent of progress made: Decisions and Recommendations of States Parties 9 4 Nature and extent of progress made: quantitative aspects 9 5 Complications and challenges 16 6 Nature and extent of progress made: qualitative aspects 18 7 Efforts undertaken to ensure the effective exclusion of civilians from mined areas 21 # Anti-Tank mines removed and destroyed 24 # Items of UXO removed and destroyed 24 8 Mine Accidents 25 9 Nature and extent of the remaining Article 5 challenge: quantitative aspects 27 10 The Disaggregation of Current Contamination 30 11 Nature and extent of the remaining Article 5 challenge: qualitative aspects 41 12 Circumstances that impeded compliance during previous extension period 43 12.1 Humanitarian, economic, social and environmental implications of the
    [Show full text]
  • Tables from the 5Th Sudan Population and Housing Census, 2008
    Southern Sudan Counts: Tables from the 5th Sudan Population and Housing Census, 2008 November 19, 2010 CENSU OR S,S F TA RE T T IS N T E IC C S N A N A 123 D D β U E S V A N L R ∑σ µ U E A H T T I O U N O S S S C C S E Southern Sudan Counts: Tables from the 5th Sudan Population and Housing Census, 2008 November 19, 2010 ii Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................. iv Acronyms ...................................................................................................................... x Foreword ....................................................................................................................... xiv Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................ xv Background and Mandate of the Southern Sudan Centre for Census, Statistics and Evaluation (SSCCSE) ...................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 History of Census-taking in Southern Sudan....................................................................... 2 Questionnaire Content, Sampling and Methodology ............................................................ 2 Implementation .............................................................................................................. 2
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan Pilot Community Forestry Project
    SOUTH SUDAN PILOT COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROJECT SOUTH SUDAN PILOT COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROJECT SOUTH SUDAN PILOT COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROJECT PARTICIPATORY RURAL APPRAISALS OF IFWOTO AND LAINYA PAYAMS PARTICIPATORY RURAL APPRAISALS OF IFWOTO PARTICIPATORY RURALAND APPRAISALS LAINYA PAYAMS OF IFWOTO AND LAINYA PAYAMS [Cover photo] South Sudan[Cover photo] Pilot [Cover photo] Community Forestry September 2013 ProjectSeptember 2013 September 2013 Participatory Rural Appraisals of Ifwoto and Lainya Payams November 2013 Disclaimer No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from UNEP. The contents of this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP, or contributory organizations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES..............................................................................................................................................4 LIST OF FIGURES............................................................................................................................................4 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ...............................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Mining in South Sudan: Opportunities and Risks for Local Communities
    » REPORT JANUARY 2016 MINING IN SOUTH SUDAN: OPPORTUNITIES AND RISKS FOR LOCAL COMMUNITIES BASELINE ASSESSMENT OF SMALL-SCALE AND ARTISANAL GOLD MINING IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EQUATORIA STATES, SOUTH SUDAN MINING IN SOUTH SUDAN FOREWORD We are delighted to present you the findings of an assessment conducted between February and May 2015 in two states of South Sudan. With this report, based on dozens of interviews, focus group discussions and community meetings, a multi-disciplinary team of civil society and government representatives from South Sudan are for the first time shedding light on the country’s artisanal and small-scale mining sector. The picture that emerges is a remarkable one: artisanal gold mining in South Sudan ‘employs’ more than 60,000 people and might indirectly benefit almost half a million people. The vast majority of those involved in artisanal mining are poor rural families for whom alluvial gold mining provides critical income to supplement their subsistence livelihood of farming and cattle rearing. Ostensibly to boost income for the cash-strapped government, artisanal mining was formalized under the Mining Act and subsequent Mineral Regulations. However, owing to inadequate information-sharing and a lack of government mining sector staff at local level, artisanal miners and local communities are not aware of these rules. In reality there is almost no official monitoring of artisanal or even small-scale mining activities. Despite the significant positive impact on rural families’ income, the current form of artisanal mining does have negative impacts on health, the environment and social practices. With most artisanal, small-scale and exploration mining taking place in rural areas with abundant small arms and limited presence of government security forces, disputes over land access and ownership exacerbate existing conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Tenure Issues in Southern Sudan: Key Findings and Recommendations for Southern Sudan Land Policy
    LAND TENURE ISSUES IN SOUTHERN SUDAN: KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOUTHERN SUDAN LAND POLICY DECEMBER 2010 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Tetra Tech ARD. LAND TENURE ISSUES IN SOUTHERN SUDAN: KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOUTHERN SUDAN LAND POLICY THE RESULTS OF A RESEARCH COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE SUDAN PROPERTY RIGHTS PROGRAM AND THE NILE INSTITUTE OF STRATEGIC POLICY AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES DECEMBER 2010 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS Acknowledgements Page i Scoping Paper Section A Sibrino Barnaba Forojalla and Kennedy Crispo Galla Jurisdiction of GOSS, State, County, and Customary Authorities over Land Section B Administration, Planning, and Allocation: Juba County, Central Equatoria State Lomoro Robert Bullen Land Tenure and Property Rights in Southern Sudan: A Case Study of Section C Informal Settlements in Juba Gabriella McMichael Customary Authority and Traditional Authority in Southern Sudan: A Case Study Section D of Juba County Wani Mathias Jumi Conflict Over Resources Among Rural Communities in Southern Sudan Section E Andrew Athiba Synthesis Paper Section F Sibrino Barnaba Forojalla and Kennedy Crispo Galla ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The USAID Sudan Property Rights Program has supported the Southern Sudan Land Commission in its efforts to undertake consultation and research on land tenure and property rights issues; the findings of these initiatives were used to draft a land policy that is meant to be both legitimate and relevant to the needs of Southern Sudanese citizens and legal rights-holders.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan - Crisis Fact Sheet #4, Fiscal Year (Fy) 2019 March 8, 2019
    SOUTH SUDAN - CRISIS FACT SHEET #4, FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2019 MARCH 8, 2019 NUMBERS AT USAID/OFDA1 FUNDING HIGHLIGHTS A GLANCE BY SECTOR IN FY 2018 Insecurity in Yei results in unknown number of civilian deaths, prevents 15,000 5% 7% 20% people from receiving aid 7.1 million 7% Estimated People in South Health actors continue EVD awareness Sudan Requiring Humanitarian 10% and screening activities Assistance 19% 2019 Humanitarian Response Plan – WFP conducts first road delivery to 15% December 2018 central Unity 17% Logistics Support & Relief Commodities (20%) Water, Sanitation & Hygiene (19%) HUMANITARIAN FUNDING Health (17%) 6.5 million FOR THE SOUTH SUDAN RESPONSE Nutrition (15%) Estimated People in Need of Protection (10%) Food Assistance in South Sudan Agriculture & Food Security (7%) USAID/OFDA $135,187,409 IPC Technical Working Group – Humanitarian Coordination & Info Management (7%) February 2019 Shelter & Settlements (5%) USAID/FFP $398,226,647 3 State/PRM $91,553,826 1.9 million USAID/FFP2 FUNDING $624,967,8824 Estimated IDPs in BY MODALITY IN FY 2018 1% TOTAL USG HUMANITARIAN FUNDING FOR THE South Sudan SOUTH SUDAN CRISIS IN FY 2018 UN – January 31, 2019 84% 9% 5% U.S. In-Kind Food Aid (84%) 1% $3,756,094,855 Local & Regional Food Procurement (9%) TOTAL USG HUMANITARIAN FUNDING FOR THE Complementary Services (5%) SOUTH SUDAN RESPONSE IN FY 2014–2018, Cash Transfers for Food (1%) INCLUDING FUNDING FOR SOUTH SUDANESE 191,238 Food Vouchers (1%) REFUGEES IN NEIGHBORING COUNTRIES Estimated Individuals Seeking Refuge at UNMISS Bases UNMISS – March 4, 2019 KEY DEVELOPMENTS Ongoing violence between Government of the Republic of South Sudan (GoRSS) and opposition forces near Central Equatoria State’s Yei area has displaced an estimated 2.3 million 7,400 people to Yei town since December and is preventing relief agencies from reaching Estimated Refugees and Asylum more than 15,000 additional people seeking safety outside of Yei, the UN reports.
    [Show full text]
  • C the Impact of Conflict on the Livestock Sector in South Sudan
    C The Impact of Conflict on the Livestock Sector in South Sudan ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to express their gratitude to the following persons (from State Ministries of Livestock and Fishery Industries and FAO South Sudan Office) for collecting field data from the sample counties in nine of the ten States of South Sudan: Angelo Kom Agoth; Makuak Chol; Andrea Adup Algoc; Isaac Malak Mading; Tongu James Mark; Sebit Taroyalla Moris; Isaac Odiho; James Chatt Moa; Samuel Ajiing Uguak; Samuel Dook; Rogina Acwil; Raja Awad; Simon Mayar; Deu Lueth Ader; Mayok Dau Wal and John Memur. The authors also extend their special thanks to Erminio Sacco, Chief Technical Advisor and Dr Abdal Monium Osman, Senior Programme Officer, at FAO South Sudan for initiating this study and providing the necessary support during the preparatory and field deployment phases. DISCLAIMER FAO South Sudan mobilized a team of independent consultants to conduct this study. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO. COMPOSITION OF STUDY TEAM Yacob Aklilu Gebreyes (Team Leader) Gezu Bekele Lemma Luka Biong Deng Shaif Abdullahi i C The Impact of Conflict on the Livestock Sector in South Sudan TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...I ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................................................................................... VI NOTES ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Internews in South Sudan Map Updated May 2020
    INTERNEWS IN SOUTH SUDAN MAP UPDATED MAY 2020 SUDAN SUDAN UPPER NILE SUDAN Jamjang 11 3 Gendrassa Abyei 1 2 UNITY 34 Malakal 40 Bentiu 0 km 100 km Turalei 7 SUDAN 4 5 Nasir WESTERN Aweil BAHR EL NORTHERN GHAZAL BAHR EL 32 GHAZAL Kwajok WARRAP D.R. 41 Wau ETHIOPIA CONGO 42 Leer Pochala 36 JONGLEI 37 38 Rumbek LAKES 8 9 10 6 Bor South Awerial Sudan WESTERN Mundri EASTERN EQUATORIA 35 EQUATORIA 12 18 24 30 13 19 25 Ilemi- Kapoeta Dreieck Yambio Juba 14 20 26 15 21 27 31 TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONS 43 16 22 28 Radio Station 17 23 29 Torit Repeaters CENTRAL KENYA Media Training Institution EQUATORIA Magwi DEMOCRATIC 33 Advocacy Organization REPUBLIC OF Media Outlet THE CONGO Community-Based Organization UGANDA Associate Partner Type Location Partner Reach (if applicable) Partnership Active 1 Radio Station Abyei, Agok Abyei FM 60 km radius 2015 - Present 3 Radio Station Jamjang, Unity Jamjang FM 60 km radius 2016 - Pesent 4 Radio Station Aweil, Northern Bahr el Ghazal Akol Yam 91.0FM 150 km radius 2017 - Present 6 Radio Station Awerial, Lakes Mingkaman 100FM 150 km radius 2014 - Present 7 Radio Station Bentiu, Unity Kondial FM 30 km radius 2018 - Present 8 Radio Station Bor, Jonglei Radio Jonglei 50 km radius 2018 11 Radio Station Gendrassa, Upper Nile Radio Salam 30 km radius 2019 - Present 19 Radio Station Juba, Central Equatoria Radio Bakhita 100 km radius 2015-2016 23 Radio Station Juba, Central Equatoria Advance Youth Radio 50 km radius 2019 - Present 26 Radio Station Juba, Central Equatoria Eye Radio 60 km radius 2014 - Present 28 Radio Station
    [Show full text]
  • Unity Jonglei Upper Nile Lakes Central Equatoria Rumbek Juba
    Jonglei, Unity and Upper Ni3l0e° Eare identified as Conflict Affected States. 32° E 34° E Khartoum All locations within these 3 states consider under "Free-to-Use" except refugee camps (Cost Recovery) in Unity and Upper Nile Dilling Gerger Sudan 12° N Alakafaria 12° N Upper Dalami Rashad Nile Renk Ab yei Unity El Roseires Avg. Payload: Ed DamEthaiozpiian 5.2 MT South Sudan Jonglei Wadakona CAR Umm Heitan Abu Jibaiha Lagawa Kenya DRC Heiban Kadugli (North) Uganda Sudan Kadugli (South) Umm Dorain Kologi Wirni Kurmuk Paloich Melut Avg. Payload: Athidway 5.2 MT Yida Jemaam Kaya Asosa Higlig Ajuong Pariang Thok Yusuf Doro 10° N Batil Bunj/Maban 10° N Oriny Kodok Gendrassa Rom Avg. Payload: Lul 5.2 MT Abyei Akoka Bambesi Wau Nyingaro Shaluk Unity Malakal Tonga Avg. Payload: 5.2 MT Upper Nile Abiemnhom Juaibor New Kaldak Avg. Payload: Rubkona Pigi Fangak Baliet 5.2 MT Kuernyang Kurwai Kamel Mayom Mayom Khorfulus Wun-Gak Avg. Payload: Dajo Bentiu Atar 1.3 MT Guit Paguer Old Abwong Fangak Riang Mankien Wang-Kay Kadet Wunrok Chuil Kiech Mathiang Nhialdiu Kon Gidami Wicok Ngop Kuach Juong Boaw Thow Toic Kuacdeng Mading Gaireng Turkej Pagil Gum Ulang Wathjak NassAvegr. Payload: Koch Menime Maiwut Pultruk Nyangore 5.2 MT Kandak Mandeng Mir Mir Haat Pagak Pading Nyambor Lankien Jikmir Mogok Makak Pagak Jiech Avg. Payload: Jikou Dablual 5.2 MT Metar Leer Malwal-Gakhoth Nyenyang Kowerneng Wai Gorway Gambela Nyanepol Mayendit Adok Motot Mwot Tot Waat Itang Ayod Avg. Payload: Pathai Walgak Pagiel Pieri Wanding 5.2 MT Torwar Kotdalok 8° N Madol Yuai Ethiopia 8° N Warrap Abobo Duk Akobo Shentewa Nyal Ayueldit Fadiat Pajut Avg.
    [Show full text]