DOCSLIB.ORG

Europe's Foreign and Security Policy: the Institutionalization of Cooperation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Europe's Foreign and Security Policy: the Institutionalization of Cooperation Europe’s Foreign and Security Policy The Institutionalization of Cooperation Michael E. Smith .6768B:DDC Cambridge54B697 B95B7 Books 4B69727BCD/ Online © Cambridge University0D Press, 2009C475DDD:74B697B7 D7BC8C747D:DDC 54B697 B95B7D7BC :DDC6 B9 ,1 CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, United Kingdom Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521831352 © Michael E. Smith 2004 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provision of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published in print format 2003 isbn-13ISBN-13 978-0-511-49170-2 OCeISBN isbn-13ISBN-13 978-0-521-83135-22 hardback isbn-10ISBN-10 0-521-83135-00 hardback isbn-13ISBN-13 978-0-521-53861-99 paperback isbn-10ISBN-10 0-521-53861-00 paperback Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this book, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. .6768B:DDC Cambridge54B697 B95B7 Books 4B69727BCD/ Online © Cambridge University0D Press, 2009C475DDD:74B697B7 D7BC8C747D:DDC 54B697 B95B7D7BC :DDC6 B9 ,1 Europe’s Foreign and Security Policy The Institutionalization of Cooperation The emergence of a common security and foreign policy has been one of the most contentious issues accompanying the integration of the European Union. In this book, Michael Smith examines the specific ways foreign policy cooperation has been institutionalized in the EU, the way institutional development affects cooperative outcomes in foreign policy, and how those outcomes lead to new institutional reforms. Smith explains the evolution and performance of the institutional procedures of the EU using a unique analytical framework, supported by extensive em- pirical evidence drawn from interviews, case studies, official documents and secondary sources. His perceptive and well-informed analysis cov- ers the entire history of EU foreign policy cooperation, from its origins in the late 1960s up to the start of the 2003 constitutional convention. Demonstrating the importance and extent of EU foreign/security policy, the book will be of interest to scholars, researchers and policymakers. MICHAEL E.SMITH is Assistant Professor of Political Science, Georgia State University, Atlanta. .6768B:DDC Cambridge54B697 B95B7 Books 4B69727BCD/ Online © Cambridge University0D Press, 2009C475DDD:74B697B7 D7BC8C747D:DDC 54B697 B95B7D7BC :DDC6 B9 ,1 For Pen with love .6768B:DDC Cambridge54B697 B95B7 Books 4B69727BCD/ Online © Cambridge University0D Press, 2009C475DDD:74B697B7 D7BC8C747D:DDC 54B697 B95B7D7BC :DDC6 B9 ,1 .6768B:DDC Cambridge54B697 B95B7 Books 4B69727BCD/ Online © Cambridge University0D Press, 2009C475DDD:74B697B7 D7BC8C747D:DDC 54B697 B95B7D7BC :DDC6 B9 ,1 Contents List of tables page xi Acknowledgments xii List of abbreviations xiv Introduction: foreign and security policy in the European Union 1 Part I Institutions and foreign policy cooperation: the theoretical and empirical terrain 1 The institutionalization of cooperation: an analytical framework 17 2 Institutions and European foreign policy cooperation: the empirical link 37 Part II The institutionalization of cooperation 3 Origins: intergovernmentalism and European Political Cooperation 63 4 Information-sharing and the transgovernmental EPC network 90 5 Norms, rules, and laws in European foreign policy 117 6 Organizations and European foreign policy 145 7 Toward governance: the Common Foreign and Security Policy 176 ix .6768B:DDC Cambridge54B697 B95B7 Books 4B69727BCD/ Online © Cambridge University0D Press, 2009C475DDD:74B697B7 D7BC8C747D:DDC 54B697 B95B7D7BC :DDC6 B9 ,1 x Contents Part III Residual institutional issues 8 Unfinished business: coherence and the EU’s global ambitions 209 Conclusion: beyond the CFSP: institutions, defense, and the European identity 239 References 264 Index 284 .6768B:DDC Cambridge54B697 B95B7 Books 4B69727BCD/ Online © Cambridge University0D Press, 2009C475DDD:74B697B7 D7BC8C747D:DDC 54B697 B95B7D7BC :DDC6 B9 ,1 Tables 2.1 EPC actions, and CFSP common positions and joint actions, 1970–95 page 51 2.2 Year of first use of major EPC/CFSP policy instruments 53 2.3 Qualitatively measuring EU foreign policy cooperation 56 3.1 EPC according to the Luxembourg Report (October 1970) 75 4.1 EPC according to the Copenhagen Report (July 1973) 96 4.2 Growth in the number of COREU telexes on EPC, 1974–94 101 5.1 EPC according to the London Report (October 1981) 127 5.2 EC rules invoked in the context of EPC 131 6.1 EPC according to the Single European Act (February 1986) 150 7.1 The CFSP policy process under Maastricht 181 8.1 The TEU’s organization of external relations 213 9.1 General logics and causes of institutionalization 241 9.2 Specific causes and components of EU foreign policy institutionalization 243 xi .6768B:DDC Cambridge54B697 B95B7 Books 4B69727BCD/ Online © Cambridge University0D Press, 2009C475DDD:74B697B7 D7BC8C747D:DDC 54B697 B95B7D7BC :DDC6 B9 ,1 Acknowledgments It is somehow appropriate that a book on international cooperation should begin by acknowledging the generous support of individuals and institutions on two continents. I would first like to thank Wayne Sandholtz for his extensive advice and unfailing encouragement throughout the en- tire process, from conception to research to writing. I could not have asked for a better mentor for this project. Roy Ginsberg’s detailed studies of EU foreign policy actions helped to inspire this volume; he also gra- ciously provided extensive comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript. The other members of my dissertation committee, Russell Dalton and Patrick Morgan, added their votes of confidence to my efforts at key stages and for that I am grateful. I would also like to thank several scholars whose large body of work on the EU provided much of the empirical evidence for the analysis presented here. They were also kind enough to take interest in my work and lend their insights to the project. In addition to Roy Ginsberg, these scholars include David Allen, Simon Bulmer, Fraser Cameron, Jim Caporaso, Thomas Grunert, Christopher Hill, John Peterson, and Michael Smith. I am also grateful to the members of two “Institutionalization of Europe” workshops led by Wayne Sandholtz, Alec Stone Sweet, and Neil Fligstein, who helped stimulate some of the ideas presented here. Special mention goes to Simon Nuttall, who shared his detailed knowledge of the history of EU foreign and security policy with me and saved me from a number of errors. Any that remain, of course, are entirely my own. This research was supported financially by several institutions: the Council for European Studies, the US Institute for International Ed- ucation (Fulbright fellowship), the University of California Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation/MacArthur Foundation, the UC- Irvine Regent’s fellowship program, the European Union Center of the University System of Georgia, and the Bicentennial Swedish-American Fund of the Swedish Government Information Service. The Centre for European Studies in Brussels provided a very stimulating environment for my initial explorations into the EU; the manuscript also benefited from xii .6768B:DDC Cambridge54B697 B95B7 Books 4B69727BCD/ Online © Cambridge University0D Press, 2009C475DDD:74B697B7 D7BC8C747D:DDC 54B697 B95B7D7BC :DDC6 B9 ,1 Acknowledgments xiii presentations at meetings of the European Union Studies Association, the Council for European Studies, and the International Studies Asso- ciation, as well as graduate student conferences at Columbia University, Georgetown University, and Harvard University. Small portions of the argument have appeared in the Journal of Common Market Studies and the Journal of European Public Policy, and I appreciate the input given by the editors of those journals (Iain Begg, John Peterson, and Jeremy Richardson). My editor at Cambridge University Press, John Haslam, expertly guided me through the book production process, and I am especially grateful to the two external reviewers he chose for their sound advice on improving the final manuscript. I would also like to thank the numer- ous officials involved in EU foreign policy who agreed to be interviewed for this project. It would have been impossible to develop my arguments about the relationship between institutionalization and cooperation with- out the valuable inside knowledge provided by these individuals. The same is true for officials from the US mission to the European Union who monitor the foreign policy of the EU and shared their opinions of it with me. Finally, I would like to thank my family for their generous emotional (and financial) support of my scholarly ambitions. I would not have had the courage to take this path without them. My last word of thanks is reserved for the person to whom this book is dedicated, my wife Penny, for her love, patience, and encouragement. .6768B:DDC Cambridge54B697 B95B7 Books 4B69727BCD/ Online © Cambridge University0D Press, 2009C475DDD:74B697B7 D7BC8C747D:DDC 54B697 B95B7D7BC :DDC6 B9 ,1 Abbreviations ACP African, Caribbean, and Pacific States ASEAN Association of Southeast Asian Nations ASEM Asia–Europe Meeting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Worlds Apart: Bosnian Lessons for Global Security
    Worlds Apart Swanee Hunt Worlds Apart Bosnian Lessons for GLoBaL security Duke university Press Durham anD LonDon 2011 © 2011 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper ♾ Designed by C. H. Westmoreland Typeset in Charis by Tseng Information Systems, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data appear on the last printed page of this book. To my partners c harLes ansBacher: “Of course you can.” and VaLerie GiLLen: “Of course we can.” and Mirsad JaceVic: “Of course you must.” Contents Author’s Note xi Map of Yugoslavia xii Prologue xiii Acknowledgments xix Context xxi Part i: War Section 1: Officialdom 3 1. insiDe: “Esteemed Mr. Carrington” 3 2. outsiDe: A Convenient Euphemism 4 3. insiDe: Angels and Animals 8 4. outsiDe: Carter and Conscience 10 5. insiDe: “If I Left, Everyone Would Flee” 12 6. outsiDe: None of Our Business 15 7. insiDe: Silajdžić 17 8. outsiDe: Unintended Consequences 18 9. insiDe: The Bread Factory 19 10. outsiDe: Elegant Tables 21 Section 2: Victims or Agents? 24 11. insiDe: The Unspeakable 24 12. outsiDe: The Politics of Rape 26 13. insiDe: An Unlikely Soldier 28 14. outsiDe: Happy Fourth of July 30 15. insiDe: Women on the Side 33 16. outsiDe: Contact Sport 35 Section 3: Deadly Stereotypes 37 17. insiDe: An Artificial War 37 18. outsiDe: Clashes 38 19. insiDe: Crossing the Fault Line 39 20. outsiDe: “The Truth about Goražde” 41 21. insiDe: Loyal 43 22. outsiDe: Pentagon Sympathies 46 23. insiDe: Family Friends 48 24. outsiDe: Extremists 50 Section 4: Fissures and Connections 55 25.
    [Show full text]
  • BEITRAGSTITEL, Times New Roman, Fett, 16Pt, Großbuchstaben
    POLICE IN PEACE OPERATIONS Erwin A. Schmidl Preface Peace operations, from their beginning in the nineteenth century and increasingly since the end of the Cold War, have included varying degrees of "police activities," ranging from supervising indigenous police agencies to actually performing law enforcement duties. Until recently, this aspect of peace operations has often been overlooked or under-appreciated in favour of the military, humanitarian, and political components of such missions. The following paper gives an overview of peace operations which involved police functions — known as "civilian police," or CIVPOL, in U.N. language. I became involved in the study of police in peace operations while I was a Senior Fellow at the U.S. Institute of Peace in 1995-96. A first conference on this subject was organised at the USIP in May 1996, followed by a series of conferences and workshops convened by Ambassador Robert B. Oakley and Colonel Michael J. Dziedzic at the National Defense University in Washington D.C. in 1996-97. This resulted in their recent volume Policing the New World Disorder: Peace Operations and Public Security, perhaps the most comprehensive contribution to our knowledge of police aspects in peace operations. The following paper is a summary of peace operations including police aspects, both by the United Nations and outside the U.N. framework. The information is based on a variety of sources, and is accurate as of July 1998. Two new missions have not been included: in April 1998, a U.N. operation was established for the Central African Republic (MINURCA, Mission des Nations Unies en République Central-Africaine) which includes 17 police officers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Intergovernmental Cooperation in the European Process
    1 Article à paraître en janvier dans Challenge Europe, le magazine on-line du European Policy Center The Evolution of Intergovernmental Cooperation in the European process. The Luxemburg report, also known as the Davignon report, adopted by Foreign Ministers in October 1970 is a generally accepted departure point for intergovernmental cooperation among members of the European Community. It was the first time that the “Community method”, devised by Jean Monnet and consolidated by the treaty of Rome on the basis of texts prepared by the Spaak Committee, was deliberately discarded, in the field of foreign policy, in favour of the traditional methods of diplomatic consultation, in an exercise initially known as “political cooperation”. The significance of that initial step can only be understood by a flashback to the failure of the Fouchet negotiations in the spring of 1962. That negotiation, launched and largely dominated by General de Gaulle, had been understood by his partners as a deliberate attempt to subordinate the nascent European Community to an intergovernmental construction established in Paris, presumably dominated by France, and without any of the supranational procedures or institutions which had made Monnet’s proposals acceptable to the smaller countries. Its final failure was immediately perceived as a turning point, as a clear parting of the ways between the Gaullist concept of l’Europe des patries and the supranational concept developed in the fifties. It was moreover quite acrimonious: participants accusing each other of arrogant and irresponsible behaviour. In his memoirs Paul-Henri Spaak, who played a prominent role both as Belgian Foreign Minister and as foster father of the treaty of Rome, clearly puts the responsibility on the shoulders of Couve de Murville.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Development of European Integration
    FACT SHEETS ON THE EUROPEAN UNION The historical development of European integration PE 618.969 1. The First Treaties.....................................................................................................3 2. Developments up to the Single European Act.........................................................6 3. The Maastricht and Amsterdam Treaties...............................................................10 4. The Treaty of Nice and the Convention on the Future of Europe..........................14 5. The Treaty of Lisbon..............................................................................................18 EN - 18/06/2018 ABOUT THE PUBLICATION This leaflet contains a compilation of Fact Sheets provided by Parliament’s Policy Departments and Economic Governance Support Unit on the relevant policy area. The Fact Sheets are updated regularly and published on the website of the European Parliament: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets ABOUT THE PUBLISHER Author of the publication: European Parliament Department responsible: Unit for Coordination of Editorial and Communication Activities E-mail: [email protected] Manuscript completed in June, 2018 © European Union, 2018 DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial of the Republic of Croatia
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (CROATIA v. YUGOSLAVIA) MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA APPENDICES VOLUME 5 1 MARCH 2001 II III Contents Page Appendix 1 Chronology of Events, 1980-2000 1 Appendix 2 Video Tape Transcript 37 Appendix 3 Hate Speech: The Stimulation of Serbian Discontent and Eventual Incitement to Commit Genocide 45 Appendix 4 Testimonies of the Actors (Books and Memoirs) 73 4.1 Veljko Kadijević: “As I see the disintegration – An Army without a State” 4.2 Stipe Mesić: “How Yugoslavia was Brought Down” 4.3 Borisav Jović: “Last Days of the SFRY (Excerpts from a Diary)” Appendix 5a Serb Paramilitary Groups Active in Croatia (1991-95) 119 5b The “21st Volunteer Commando Task Force” of the “RSK Army” 129 Appendix 6 Prison Camps 141 Appendix 7 Damage to Cultural Monuments on Croatian Territory 163 Appendix 8 Personal Continuity, 1991-2001 363 IV APPENDIX 1 CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS1 ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE CHRONOLOGY BH Bosnia and Herzegovina CSCE Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe CK SKJ Centralni komitet Saveza komunista Jugoslavije (Central Committee of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia) EC European Community EU European Union FRY Federal Republic of Yugoslavia HDZ Hrvatska demokratska zajednica (Croatian Democratic Union) HV Hrvatska vojska (Croatian Army) IMF International Monetary Fund JNA Jugoslavenska narodna armija (Yugoslav People’s Army) NAM Non-Aligned Movement NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organisation
    [Show full text]
  • Qualified Majority Voting from the Single European Act to Present Day: an Unexpected Permanence
    Qualified majority voting from the Single European Act to present day: an unexpected permanence Stéphanie NOVAK Studies & 88 Research Study & Qualified majority voting from the Single European Act 88 to the present day: Research an unexpected permanence Stéphanie novak Stéphanie Novak Stéphanie Novak is a research fellow at the Hertie School of Governance (Berlin). She previously held research positions at the European University Institute (Florence), Collège de France (Paris) and Harvard University. She holds a Ph.D. in political science (Institut d’études politiques de Paris, 2009) and is an alumna of the École normale supérieure (ENS). She graduated in philosophy (Master and agregation). Her Ph.D. thesis was published in 2011 by Dalloz, Paris: La prise de décision au Conseil de l’Union européenne. Pratiques du vote et du consensus. Qualified majority voting from the Single european act to the preSent day: an unexpected permanence Notre Europe Notre Europe is an independent think tank devoted to European integration. Under the guidance of Jacques Delors, who created Notre Europe in 1996, the association aims to “think a united Europe”. Our ambition is to contribute to the current public debate by producing analyses and pertinent policy proposals that strive for a closer union of the peoples of Europe. We are equally devoted to promoting the active engagement of citizens and civil society in the process of community construction and the creation of a European public space. In this vein, the staff of Notre Europe directs research projects; produces and disseminates analyses in the form of short notes, studies, and articles; and organises public debates and seminars.
    [Show full text]
  • Steps to European Unity Community Progress to Date: a Chronology This Publication Also Appears in the Following Languages
    Steps to European unity Community progress to date: a chronology This publication also appears in the following languages: ES ISBN 92-825-7342-7 Etapas de Europa DA ISBN 92-825-7343-5 Europa undervejs DE ISBN 92-825-7344-3 Etappen nach Europa GR ISBN 92-825-7345-1 . '1;1 :rtOQEta P'J~ EiiQW:rtTJ~ FR ISBN 92-825-7347-8 Etapes europeennes IT ISBN 92-825-7348-6 Destinazione Europa NL ISBN 92-825-7349-4 Europa stap voor stap PT ISBN 92-825-7350-8 A Europa passo a passo Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1987 ISBN 92-825-7346-X Catalogue number: CB-48-87-606-EN-C Reproduction authorized in whole or in pan, provided the source is acknowledged Printed in the FR of Germany Contents 7 Introduction 9 First hopes, first failures (1950-1954) 15 Birth of the Common Market (1955-1962) 25 Two steps forward, one step back (1963-1965) 31 A compromise settlement and new beginnings (1966-1968) 35 Consolidation (1968-1970) 41 Enlargement and monetary problems (1970-1973) 47 The energy crisis and the beginning of the economic crisis (1973-1974) 53 Further enlargement and direct elections (1975-1979) 67 A Community of Ten (1981) 83 A Community of Twelve (1986) Annexes 87 Main agreements between the European Community and the rest of the world 90 Index of main developments 92 Key dates 93 Further reading Introduction Every day the European Community organizes meetings of parliamentar­ ians, ambassadors, industrialists, workers, managers, ministers, consumers, people from all walks of life, working for a common response to problems that for a long time now have transcended national frontiers.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 X 10.Long.P65
    Cambridge University Press 0521831350 - Europe’s Foreign and Security Policy: The Institutionalization of Cooperation Michael E. Smith Index More information Index accession agreements (see enlargement) Balkans (see Bosnia-Herzegovina,Croatia, acquis communautaire 124 Macedonia,Mostar,and Yugoslavia) acquis politique 124,194 Balladur Plan (see Stability Pact) Adenauer,Konrad 67 Belgium 13,26,259 Afghanistan 34,52,125,131–32,138, and the Amsterdam/Nice Treaties 233 141–42,241,258–60 and the Copenhagen Report 94,96 Africa 79,115–16,123,142,173,193, and the London Report 122,125,129 195,200,204,224 and the Luxembourg Report 65,67,70 African,Caribbean,and Pacific states and the Maastricht Treaty 178,180, (ACP) 163,200 225 Albania 205,233 and the Single European Act 156,160 Algeria 172 Birmingham Declaration (WEU) 205,232 Amsterdam Treaty (Consolidated Version blinding laser weapons 195,201 of the Treaty on European Union; Bosnia-Herzegovina 193,196,222,260 1997) 14,125,195,204,206,210, Brandt,Willy 166 226–37 Brittan,Leon 216,230 Angola 115,129,195,200 Burundi 195,200 anti-personnel landmines 193,195,201, Bush,George W. 236 222,236 anti-trust policy (see competition policy) Carrington,Lord 125 Arab-Israeli conflict (see also Euro-Arab Central/South America 28,52,56,79,88, Dialogue and Middle East) 4,21, 116,139–40,142,162,163,173, 85–87,112 245,248 Arab League 112 Central American Common Market Argentina 129,142 (CACM) 116,140 arms control 102,138,156,191,192, Central/Eastern Europe 51,56,79,81,87, 196,201,202,214,224 133,156,163,164,178,179,192,
    [Show full text]
  • The War in Croatia, 1991-1995
    7 Mile Bjelajac, team leader Ozren Žunec, team leader Mieczyslaw Boduszynski Igor Graovac Srdja Pavlović Raphael Draschtak Sally Kent Jason Vuić Rüdiger Malli This chapter stems in large part from the close collaboration and co-au- thorship of team co-leaders Mile Bjelajac and Ozren Žunec. They were supported by grants from the National Endowment for Democracy to de- fray the costs of research, writing, translation, and travel between Zagreb and Belgrade. The chapter also benefited from extensive comment and criticism from team members and project-wide reviews conducted in Feb- ruary-March 2004, November-December 2005, and October-November 2006. Several passages of prose were reconstructed in summer 2010 to address published criticism. THE WAR IN CROATIA, 1991-1995 ◆ Mile Bjelajac and Ozren Žunec ◆ Introductory Remarks Methodology and Sources Military organizations produce large quantities of documents covering all aspects of their activities, from strategic plans and decisions to reports on spending for small arms. When archives are open and documents accessible, it is relatively easy for military historians to reconstruct events in which the military partici- pated. When it comes to the military actions of the units in the field, abundant documentation provides for very detailed accounts that sometimes even tend to be overly microscopic. But there are also military organizations, wars, and indi- vidual episodes that are more difficult to reconstruct. Sometimes reliable data are lacking or are inaccessible, or there may be a controversy regarding the mean- ing of events that no document can solve. Complicated political factors and the simple but basic shortcomings of human nature also provide challenges for any careful reconstruction.
    [Show full text]
  • WHOLE NUMBER 45 Stiftelsen Norsk Okkupasjonshistorie, 2014
    WHOLE NUMBER 45 Stiftelsen norsk Okkupasjonshistorie, 2014 THE WAFFEN-SS IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE 118224 ••< i~~~i .. • SNO F.~tonilln ss volunteer on the Narv8 Front, 13 .July 1944. (Courtesy of Erik Rundkvistl Stiftelsen norsk Okkupasjonshistorie, 2014 STILL AVAILABLE FROM SIEGRUNEN AT THIS TIME SIEGRlINf'N Back Issues S!'~ nBFRST -ORUPPFNrl JfTIRFR PI\II! I fl\llfiSr-R Numbers 1-27. Each: $2.50 1\ Biography No. 2B (photocopy only!. $9.95 by ~1nrk YNqer. L)w.lity mnnoqraph. $J()_O() No. 29 (book format editionl. $5.[10 Nos. 30-Q4 (current magazine form<3tl. f:"ar:h: $5.011 sr;-OBFRsn IRMBI\NNrUn fr~FR OTTn WFfnINGn~ SIEGRUNEN BULLETIN 1\ Biography [Really the SAme AS the "arly SIE[,PUNEN issup.s) hy Mark Yf?rql?'r. 110 pnqf>s. rh(')tn~. Pt c. $1 n.on Nos. I-B. Each: SIEGRlJNEN I\NTHOLOGY IJNWIlPMS. ORfll\NI71\TION I\NfllflSTflRY elf" SIEClRUNEN NEWSLETTERS THE WI\FFFN-fiS Nos. 1-4. EACh: $1.00 Volllme~ I. 11. Ill. IV. V WI\FFEN-SS PERSONI\L1TY PRnnLES $1.00 by Bpndpr f~ TRylor", HP.RVily illt)sfnHprl. r:nrh' $10.q~\ WAL.LONIFN IINlnmMS. OPOI\NfZI\TI[)N I\Nn Iwnrmy or 28th SS ~ivision. $1'\.00 H IF I\r-RIKI\ Knr~f'S Hp-Rv; Iy j IItJ~trRterl. FRDNTFIGHTERS The Norwegian Legion or The Warren-Sf: 19'1I-10'13 t 1\ TVII\N t FnlON 200 pages. more than 200 photos and illustrations.. OriqinRI by !\rthllr GiIQAili~. rnemoirs end documents.. $15.00 Thr:> inr.rpdihlf! ~tnry of th!' l .Rtvinn SS f)ivic;;innG.
    [Show full text]
  • Blanka Matkovic Mphil/Phd Student at University of Warwick, Historian and Msc in International Relations and National Security [email protected]
    Blanka Matkovic MPhil/PhD student at University of Warwick, Historian and MSc in International relations and national security [email protected] Summary Lots of experience in journalism, NGO, translations and scientific research (history, political science) Experience MPhil/PhD student, Department of History at University of Warwick October 2012 - Present (1 month) First year student Historian (researcher) at Dom Kulture Zvonimir September 2012 - Present (2 months) Researcher on the project “The Victims of Solin in World War II”. Research results will be published in the book “The Victims of Solin” in 2013. Historian (researcher) at Municipality of Dugopolje July 2010 - June 2011 (1 year) Researcher on the project “The Victims of Dugopolje in World War II”. Research results were published in the book “The Victims of Dugopolje” in June 2011. Historian (researcher) at Croatian State Archives March 2008 - April 2011 (3 years 2 months) Researcher on the project “War crimes committed against Croatian citizens at the end and after the World War II” conducted by Croatian State Archives and Croatian State Attorney’s Office. Historian (researcher) at INTERFILM d.o.o. April 2006 - September 2006 (6 months) Research and review of archival documents for the recording of the documentary film and series Journalist at Croatian web site for web programmers and designers Webmajstori.net May 2003 - December 2003 (8 months) Web programming articles Field Researcher at B.a.B.e. (human rights organisation) July 2002 - July 2002 (1 month) I was interviewing representatives of Croatian NGOs, media professionals and politicians within a research project that aimed at detecting level of competence of civil society organizations in advocacy and lobbying and carried by international team of the researchers from Croatia, Romania, Bulgaria and Albania.
    [Show full text]
  • Developments up to the Single European Act
    DEVELOPMENTS UP TO THE SINGLE EUROPEAN ACT The main developments of the early Treaties are related to the creation of Community own resources, the reinforcement of the budgetary powers of Parliament, election of MEPs by direct universal suffrage and the setting-up of the European Monetary System (EMS). The entry into force of the Single European Act in 1986, which substantially altered the Treaty of Rome, bolstered the notion of integration by creating a large internal market. MAIN ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE FIRST STAGE OF INTEGRATION Article 8 of the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (EEC), also known as the Treaty of Rome, provided for the completion of a common market over a transitional period of 12 years, in three stages, ending on 31 December 1969. Its first aim, the customs union, was completed more quickly than expected. The transitional period for enlarging quotas and phasing out internal customs ended as early as 1 July 1968. Even so, at the end of the transitional period there were still major obstacles to freedom of movement. By then, the EEC had adopted a common external tariff for trade with non-EEC countries. Creating a ‘Green Europe’ was another major project for European integration. The first regulations on the common agricultural policy (CAP) were adopted and the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund was set up in 1962. FIRST TREATY AMENDMENTS A. Improvements to the institutions The first institutional change came about with the Merger Treaty of 8 April 1965, which merged the executive bodies. This took effect in 1967, setting up a single Council and Commission of the European Communities (the European Coal and Steel Community, the EEC and the European Atomic Energy Community) and introducing the principle of a single budget.
    [Show full text]