• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

LAPTH-028/17, MIT-CTP/4929 Probing new spin-independent interactions through precision spectroscopy in atoms with few electrons C´edricDelaunay,1 Claudia Frugiuele,2 Elina Fuchs,2 and Yotam Soreq3 1Laboratoire d'Annecy-le-Vieux de Physique Th´eoriqueLAPTh, CNRS { USMB, BP 110 Annecy-le-Vieux, F-74941 Annecy, France 2Department of Particle Physics and Astrophysics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel 3Center for Theoretical Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A. The very high precision of current measurements and theory predictions of spectral lines in few- electron atoms allows to efficiently probe the existence of exotic forces between electrons, neutrons and protons. We investigate the sensitivity to new spin-independent interactions in transition fre- quencies (and their isotopic shifts) of hydrogen, helium and some helium-like ions. We find that present data probe new regions of the force-carrier couplings to electrons and neutrons around the MeV mass range. We also find that, below few keV, the sensitivity to the electron coupling in precision spectroscopy of helium and positronium is comparable to that of the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron. Finally, we interpret our results in the dark-photon model where a new gauge boson is kinetically mixed with the photon. There, we show that helium transitions, combined with the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron, provide the strongest indirect bound from laboratory experiments above 100 keV. I. INTRODUCTION ing the experimental precision to a bound on NP is the theory uncertainty, which is by far larger than the exper- imental precision. However, the high accuracy achieved Fundamental interactions of known elementary parti- in frequency measurements of narrow atomic transitions cles are well described by the the Standard Model (SM) in heavy elements can be exploited to probe NP provided of particle physics. Nevertheless, the SM cannot be the new observables largely insensitive to theory uncertain- complete description of Nature since it does not account ties are identified. For example, Refs. [16{19] proposed to for neutrino oscillations, does not provide a viable dark bound new interactions between neutrons and electrons matter candidate and cannot explain the baryon asym- by testing linearity of King plots [20] of isotope shift (IS) metry of the Universe. Moreover, the SM suffers from measurements. several hierarchy problems, such as the stability of the The situation is different for atoms and ions with few Higgs mass to quantum corrections and the strong CP electrons and a small number of nucleons. There, QED problem. In addition, it contains intriguing puzzles re- calculations are carried out to high accuracy. For in- lated to the observed large hierarchies in the charged stance, low excited states in helium can be calculated fermion masses and quark mixing angles. However, non up to O(α6) corrections, which yields theoretical predic- of these pending issues which call for new physics (NP) tions often more accurate than the measurements, see beyond the SM indicate a specific energy scale at which e.g. Refs. [21, 22]. In addition, nuclear finite size ef- the associated NP phenomena will manifest themselves. fects are also well described thanks to the extraction of Hence, a broad experimental program must be pursued. the nuclear radius from electron scattering experiments While accelator-based experiments search directly for and muonic atom spectroscopy. This allows to directly new particles over many orders of the mass and couplings, compare theory and experiment in order to probe NP precision low-energy measurements may also reveal in- interactions [23{26]. arXiv:1709.02817v1 [hep-ph] 8 Sep 2017 directly in a complementary approach the existence of In this work we derive new limits on spin-independent new phenomena. Precise atomic physics table-top exper- NP interactions between the proton/neutron and the iments are promising in this regard. For example, ob- electron from optical frequency measurements, as well servables which violate discrete symmetries of QED, as as from frequency shifts between different isotopes, in in parity-violating transitions [1{8], are a powerful tool hydrogen and helium atoms, helium-like ions such as to probe NP [9]. lithium and nitrogen. In addition, we constrain new Parity-conserving transitions are also interesting electron-electron interactions via precision spectroscopy probes of NP which, however, require higher theoretical of helium and positronium atoms. We compare the re- control. Frequency measurements of narrow atomic tran- sulting bounds on the product of the electron and neu- sitions in heavy elements are possible within a few×10−16 tron couplings and on the electron coupling separately, relative accuracy [10, 11] thanks to the optical frequency with existing indirect constraints and future prospects comb technique [12, 13]. Moreover, the experimen- from IS measurement in heavier systems with many elec- tal uncertainty in some systems now reaches the 10−18 trons. Furthermore, we perform global fits using all avail- level [14, 15], thus indicating the possibility of significant able transitions to constrain simultaneously the electron, improvement in the near future. A limitation in translat- neutron and proton couplings in a model-independent 2 2 way. Finally, as a phenomenological application, we in- the leading finite nuclear size effects, hr iA being the nu- terpret the bounds within the dark photon model. clear charge radius squared and Fi is the field-shift (FS) constant. The IS between two isotopes A and A0 for this transition is then described as II. CONSTRAINING NEW 0 0 SPIN-INDEPENDENT INTERACTIONS IN A;A A;A 2 0 νi = νi;0 + Fiδhr iA;A0 + yeynXi(A − A ) ; (5) ATOMS 0 A;A A A0 2 2 2 where νi ≡ νi − νi and δhr iA;A0 ≡ hr iA − hr iA0 . Consider a new force mediated by a boson φ of mass Higher-order effects of nuclear charge radius and finite mφ and spin s = 0; 1; 2 with spin-independent couplings magnetic radius are not resolvable by the current exper- to the electron, proton and neutron ye, yp and yn, respec- imental accuracy [21, 30] and are therefore omitted in tively. At atomic energies, the exchange of φ is described Eqs. (4) and (5). by an effective potential between a nucleus N of charge Absolute frequencies and IS in hydrogen and helium Z and mass number A and its bound electrons as are calculated to high accuracy in the limit of point-like (−1)s+1 e−mφr nuclei. However, the full theoretical prediction is often V (r) = y y ; (1) N 4π e N r limited by the uncertainty related to the finite nuclear size effects. For a comparison between the experimental where yN ≡ ypZ +(A−Z)yn and r is the electron-nucleus value and the QED prediction in the point-nucleus limit, distance. we define For atoms with more than one electron, like helium, an A A A effective potential between electron pairs is also induced ∆i ≡ νi;exp − νi;0 : (6) 2 −mφr12 s+1 ye e The NP contribution generically depends on the three Ve(r12) = (−1) ; (2) 4π r12 coupling constants, ye, yp, and yn, and the mediator mass, m . At fixed m the product y y can be probed where r ≡ j~r − ~r j is the distance between electron 1 φ φ e n 12 1 2 independently of y from a single IS measurement (for and electron 2, with ~r , ~r describing their positions rel- p 1 2 any transition i) using Eq. (5) ative to the nucleus. 0 The total frequency shift induced by the above poten- A;A 2 tials for a transition i between atomic states a and b (with ∆i − Fiδhr iA;A0 yeyn = 0 ; (7) Eb > Ea) is described by first-order perturbation theory Xi(A − A ) as 0 0 where ∆A;A ≡ ∆A − ∆A using Eq. (6). Hence the NP A s+1 2 i i i δNPνi = (−1) yeyN Xi + ye Yi ; (3) bound depends on the change in the mean-square nu- 2 clear charge radius, δhr i 0 , which is measured either where X and Y are overlap integrals with the electronic A;A i i in electron scattering or in muonic atom spectroscopy wavefunctions depending only on the φ boson mass. In experiments. Whenever applicable, the latter typically this paper, we focus on electronic transitions in helium- yields much more precise values of the charge radii. In like and hydrogen atoms, for which the X and Y func- i i principle, the charge radius determination via electron tions are calculated within first-order perturbation the- scattering may be affected by NP. However, we find that ory using non-relativistic wavefunctions as detailed in NP is only noticeable there for large coupling values that AppendicesB andC. While QED calculations rely on are already excluded by more sensitive probes. Hence much more sophisticated wavefunctions, the use of the the charge radius extraction from electron scattering can- non-relativistic ones is a sufficient approximation to the not be contaminated by NP. Muonic atom spectroscopy dominant NP effects. Helium wavefunctions are very well measurements are more sensitive to NP contributions, approximated by antisymmetrized combinations of hy- especially in the keV{MeV mass range, and existing con- drogenic wavefunctions with effective nuclear charges ac- straints on the y y coupling product do not rule out counting for the electronic screening [27], except for the µ n the possibility of NP contaminations in this region [31{ 2S spin-singlet state where an accurate description of 33]. Therefore, for simplicity we will henceforth assume the inter-electron repulsion requires the use of Hylleraas y = 0. functions [28, 29]. µ Alternatively, the charge radius dependence can be Taking into account the NP contribution in Eq.

Load more

  16

Copy Link