DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1407.3393V1 [Cond-Mat.Supr-Con] 12 Jul 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1407.3393V1 [Cond-Mat.Supr-Con] 12 Jul 2014 Magnetic Field Expulsion from an Infinite Cylindrical Superconductor Miguel C. N. Fiolhais∗ LIP, Department of Physics, University of Coimbra, 3004-516 Coimbra, Portugal Hanno Ess´eny Department of Mechanics, KTH, 10044 Stockholm, Sweden (Dated: July 15, 2014) Abstract The solutions of the London equations for the magnetic field expulsion from superconductors are presented in this paper for the cylindrical symmetry. The result is analyzed in detail and represented numerically for the case of a uniform external magnetic field in the transverse plane. In particular, several contour plots of the magnetic energy density are depicted for the regions inside and around the superconducting area for a wide range of penetration lengths, showing how the expulsion and penetration of the magnetic field evolve with the ratio between the penetration length and the cylinder radius. The following paper is published in Physica C: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921453413004541 INTRODUCTION (r · A = 0), one obtains: 1 r2A − A = 0 ; (2) The first phenomenological description of the magnetic λ2 field expulsion from superconductors appeared soon af- ter the discovery of the Meissner-Ochsenfeld effect [1], by or, in terms of the magnetic field, the London brothers in 1935 [2]. Ever since, several dis- 1 cussions have been presented along the years on the na- 2 r B − 2 B = 0 : (3) ture of the magnetic field expulsion configuration in the λ scientific literature [3{17]. These studies comprise both This equation is perhaps the most common form of the static and time-dependent analyses, several different ge- London equation for the magnetic field expulsion inside ometries, and even the case of non-homogenous super- the superconducting region, and, in the cartesian coordi- conductors. However, while the spherical case is studied nate system, corresponds to the well-known Helmholtz's in [17{19], and the cylinder case in a parallel magnetic equation for a complex wavenumber, for each of the vec- field is presented in [19], to the best of our knowledge tor components. The magnetic field is, therefore, sup- the detailed solution of a superconducting cylinder in a pressed in the interior region through negative exponen- transversal magnetic field cannot be easily found in the tial dependencies, or, in the cylindrical and spherical academic literature. This very same case has been pre- symmetries, through modified Bessel functions of the first viously addressed by Zhilichev [7] by proposing a macro- kind [20]. scopic shell model, but without providing an explicit so- lution for the London condition. To fill this gap, we de- rive the solution of the London equations in this paper, CYLINDRICAL SYMMETRY for the magnetic field expulsion from an infinite homo- geneous superconducting cylinder in a constant external Consider a cylindrical superconductor with radius R magnetic field in the transverse plane. The dependence of in an external constant perpendicular magnetic field, in the strength and configuration of the expelled magnetic such a way the external magnetic field points in the y- field with the London penetration depth is examined in direction and the cylinder axis coincides with the z-axis. detail. In order to obtain the final static vector potential configu- The London equations for the magnetic field flux ex- ration resulting from the magnetic flux expulsion, and as- pulsion out of a superconductor can be expressed, in suming the Coulomb gauge, one must solve the Maxwell arXiv:1407.3393v1 [cond-mat.supr-con] 12 Jul 2014 terms of the magnetic vector potential A, in a single equation for the outer region: equation: r × B = r × (r × A) = r2A = 0 ; (4) 1 and the London equation (2) for the inner region. Due j = − 2 A ; (1) λ to the symmetry of the system, the magnetic field has no component in the z-axis direction, where j represents the electric current and λ the London penetration depth. After applying the Maxwell's equa- 1 @A @A B = z ρ^ − z φ^ ; (5) tion for the static case, and by taking the Coulomb gauge ρ @φ @ρ 1 and, therefore, the axial component of the vector poten- respectively. As a result, one can establish the following tial Az is the only relevant component needed to compute condition: the magnetic field. For the outer region, this component @A @A can be determined from equation (4): z = z ; (14) @ρ+ @ρ− 1 @2A @2A 1 @A z + z + z z^ = 0 ; (6) which, with the use of the relation, ρ2 @φ2 @ρ2 ρ @ρ @Iν (x) ν which is simply the Laplace equation for Az. The most = Iν−1(x) − Iν (x) (15) general solution in the outer region is, therefore, @x x in the differentiation process, leads to, P+1 Az = n=0 [An cos (nφ) + Bn sin (nφ)] n −n 2 × Cnρ + Dnρ : (7) R R I1(R/λ) Bρ>R = B0 1 − 2 + 2λ 2 sin φ ρ^ ρ ρ I0(R/λ) Assuming the magnetic field takes the form of the exter- 2 R R I1(R/λ) ^ nal field in the limit ρ ! +1, + B0 1 + 2 − 2λ 2 cos φ φ ; ρ ρ I0(R/λ) λ I (ρ/λ) B0 = B0^y = B0 φ^cos φ + ρ^sin φ ; (8) 1 Bρ<R = 2B0 sin φ ρ^ ρ I0(R/λ) and in order to respect this boundary condition, the vec- I0(ρ/λ) λ I1(ρ/λ) ^ tor potential becomes, + 2B0 − cos φ φ : (16) I0(R/λ) ρ I0(R/λ) −1 Az = const. + A1 C1ρ + D1ρ cos φ ; (9) In summary, the magnetic field vector was easily deter- mined by imposing that the axial component of the vec- where A C = −B . The remaining parameters must be 1 1 0 tor potential must a differentiable function in any point determined by the boundary conditions at the surface of of space, in particular, at the superconductor surface. A the superconductor. detailed analysis of these solutions is presented in the The general solution of the London equation in the next section. interior region, for the axial component of the vector po- tential, is somewhat more complicated: P+1 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS Az = n=0 [En cos (nφ) + Fn sin (nφ)] × [GnIn(ρ/λ) + HnKn(ρ/λ)] ; (10) Several plots of magnetic field energy density are shown in Figure 1, for different values of the London pen- where In(ρ/λ) and Kn(ρ/λ) are the cylindrical modified Bessel functions of the first and second kind, respectively. etration depth. Each of the pictures represents a cross As the modified Bessel functions of the second kind di- section of the cylinder in the x-y plane ranging from mi- verge at ρ = 0, we can exclude them a priori. nus 3 to 3 in steps of 0.01 radius units for both x and y directions. The magnetic energy density was computed To ensure continuity at the superconducting surface, 2 from equations (16) in units of B0 , i.e. the magnetic en- the Az function must take the following form on the inner region, ergy density at an infinite distance. It is clearly visible that the purple circle, corresponding to field expulsion, Az = E0G0I0(ρ/λ) + E1G1I1(ρ/λ) cos φ ; (11) shrinks to an ellipsoid as the London depth increases and the magnetic field penetrates more and more. The mag- where, netic field energy density reaches its maximum value at the cylinder's border in the horizontal axis due to the E1G1I1(R/λ) = −B0R + A1D1=R : (12) concentration of field lines in this region, and the mini- mal region is located at the top and bottom of the cylin- Since the electric current is distributed in volume, der. As the penetration depth increases, the maximal j = − 1 A, there are no pure surface currents at the cylin- λ2 regions tend to fade while entering the cylinder to form drical surface, allowing some penetration of the magnetic the ellipsoidal shaped region. field. Therefore, the following relation can be used as a Furthermore, one can see that no dramatic changes boundary condition: are perceptible until the penetration depth becomes one k = ^n × B+ − B− = 0 ; (13) order of magnitude lower than the radius of the cylin- der, when the ellipsoid starts to form. It is also worth where k is the surface current, ^n is the unitary vector noting that when the London depth equals the radius of normal to the surface and, B+ and B− are the magnetic the cylinder the magnetic field expulsion is almost imper- field at the cylinder surface in the outer and inner limits, ceptible, or in other words, the superconductor becomes 2 transparent to the magnetic field. This is also visible in Figure 2, where the dependence of the magnetic energy density along the x-axis is shown at y = 0 for different penetration depths. In particular, a single jump on the order of magnitude, from λ = 0:1 R to λ = R, is enough to have a significant phenomenological impact, i.e. the difference between an almost fully expelled field and a considerable field penetration. Finally, it is also worth discussing the range of ap- plicability of these solutions in both type-I and type-II superconductors. In type-I superconductors, the London penetration length is of the same order of magnitude or smaller than the coherence length [21, 22]. Therefore, the most accurate description is not given by the London equations alone, but by the Pippard's model instead [23]. However, in type-II superconductors, the London condi- tion indeed provides a very good description of the elec- tromagnetic field inside the superconductor in the Meiss- ner state, i.e.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Technical Note 1
    Gravito-Electromagnetic Properties of Superconductors - A Brief Review - C. J. de Matos1, M. Tajmar2 June 20th, 2003 Starting from the generalised London equations, which include a gravitomagnetic term, the gravitational and the electromagnetic properties of superconductors are derived. A phenomenological synthesis of those properties is proposed. Table of Contents I) Introduction................................................................................................2 II) Generalised London equations .................................................................2 II-a) Second generalised London equation .............................................3 II-b) First generalised London equation..................................................3 III) Gravito-electromagnetic properties of SCs .............................................3 III-a) Generalised Meissner effect ..........................................................4 III-b) SCs do not shield gravitomagnetic and / or gravitational fields....5 III-c) Generalised quantum fluxoid condition ........................................6 III-d) Supercurrents generated by GM fields..........................................7 III-e) Generalised London moment.........................................................8 III-f) Electric conductivity of SCs in a gravitational field......................9 III-g) Electrical fields in accelerated SCs .............................................13 IV) Conclusion.............................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • New Magnetosphere for the Earth in Future
    WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT Tara Ahmadi New Magnetosphere for the Earth In Future TARA AHMADI Student At Smart High School Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Ghazaly Street No3 IRAN [email protected] Abstract:- All of us know the earth magnetic field come to be less and this problem can be a serious problem in future but now we find other problems that can destroy our planet life or in minimum state can damage it such as FTE theory , solar activities , reversing magnetic poles, increasing speed of reversing that last reverse, reducing magnetic strength ,finding leaks in magnetosphere ,etc. some of these reasons will be factors for increasing the solar energy that hit to the Earth and perhaps changing in our life and conditions of the Earth . In this paper , I try to show a way to against to these problems and reduce their damages to the Earth perhaps The Earth will repair himself but this repair need many time that humans could not be wait. In the past time magnetic field was reversed but now we are against to the other problems that can increase the influence of reversing magnetic field for the Earth and all these events can be a separated problem for us, these problem may be can not destroyed humans life but can be cause of several problems that occur for our healthy and our technology in space. This way is building a system that produce a new magne tic field that will be in one way with old magnetic field this system will construe by superconductors and a metal that is not dipole.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrodynamics of Superconductors Has to According to Maxwell’S Equations, Just As the Four-Vectors J a Be Describable by Relativistically Covariant Equations
    Electrodynamics of superconductors J. E. Hirsch Department of Physics, University of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA 92093-0319 (Dated: December 30, 2003) An alternate set of equations to describe the electrodynamics of superconductors at a macroscopic level is proposed. These equations resemble equations originally proposed by the London brothers but later discarded by them. Unlike the conventional London equations the alternate equations are relativistically covariant, and they can be understood as arising from the ’rigidity’ of the superfluid wave function in a relativistically covariant microscopic theory. They predict that an internal ’spontaneous’ electric field exists in superconductors, and that externally applied electric fields, both longitudinal and transverse, are screened over a London penetration length, as magnetic fields are. The associated longitudinal dielectric function predicts a much steeper plasmon dispersion relation than the conventional theory, and a blue shift of the minimum plasmon frequency for small samples. It is argued that the conventional London equations lead to difficulties that are removed in the present theory, and that the proposed equations do not contradict any known experimental facts. Experimental tests are discussed. PACS numbers: I. INTRODUCTION these equations are not correct, and propose an alternate set of equations. It has been generally accepted that the electrodynam- There is ample experimental evidence in favor of Eq. ics of superconductors in the ’London limit’ (where the (1b), which leads to the Meissner effect. That equation response to electric and magnetic fields is local) is de- is in fact preserved in our alternative theory. However, scribed by the London equations[1, 2]. The first London we argue that there is no experimental evidence for Eq.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0807.1883V2 [Cond-Mat.Soft] 29 Dec 2008 Asnmes 14.M 36.A 60.B 45.70.Mg 46.05.+B, 83.60.La, 81.40.Lm, Numbers: PACS Model
    Granular Solid Hydrodynamics Yimin Jiang1, 2 and Mario Liu1 1Theoretische Physik, Universit¨at T¨ubingen,72076 T¨ubingen, Germany 2Central South University, Changsha 410083, China (Dated: October 27, 2018) Abstract Granular elasticity, an elasticity theory useful for calculating static stress distribution in gran- ular media, is generalized to the dynamic case by including the plastic contribution of the strain. A complete hydrodynamic theory is derived based on the hypothesis that granular medium turns transiently elastic when deformed. This theory includes both the true and the granular tempera- tures, and employs a free energy expression that encapsulates a full jamming phase diagram, in the space spanned by pressure, shear stress, density and granular temperature. For the special case of stationary granular temperatures, the derived hydrodynamic theory reduces to hypoplasticity, a state-of-the-art engineering model. PACS numbers: 81.40.Lm, 83.60.La, 46.05.+b, 45.70.Mg arXiv:0807.1883v2 [cond-mat.soft] 29 Dec 2008 1 Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Sand – a Transiently Elastic Medium 8 III. Jamming and Granular Equilibria 10 A. Liquid Equilibrium 10 B. Solid Equilibrium 11 C. Granular Equilibria 12 IV. Granular Temperature Tg 13 A. The Equilibrium Condition for Tg 13 B. The Equation of Motion for sg 14 C. Two Fluctuation-Dissipation Theorems 16 V. Elastic and Plastic Strain 17 VI. The Granular Free Energy 18 A. The Elastic Energy 20 B. Density Dependence of 22 B C. Higher-Order Strain Terms 23 D. Pressure Contribution From Agitated Grains 25 E. The Edwards Entropy 27 VII. Granular Hydrodynamic Theory 28 A.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Equations Aria Yom Abstract: the London Equations Were the First Successful Attempt at Characterizing the Electrodynamic Behavior of Superconductors
    The London Equations Aria Yom Abstract: The London Equations were the first successful attempt at characterizing the electrodynamic behavior of superconductors. In this paper we review the motivation, derivation, and modification of the London equations since 1935. We also mention further developments by Pippard and others. The shaping influences of experiments on theory are investigated. Introduction: Following the discovery of superconductivity in supercooled mercury by Heike Onnes in 1911, and its subsequent discovery in various other metals, the early pioneers of condensed matter physics were faced with a mystery which continues to be unraveled today. Early experiments showed that below a critical temperature, a conventional conductor could abruptly transition into a superconducting state, wherein currents seemed to flow without resistance. This motivated a simple model of a superconductor as one in which charges were influenced only by the Lorentz force from an external field, and not by any dissipative interactions. This would lead to the following equation: 푚 푑퐽 = 퐸 (1) 푛푒2 푑푡 Where m, e, and n are the mass, charge, and density of the charge carriers, commonly taken to be electrons at the time this equation was being considered. In the following we combine these variables into a new constant both for convenience and because the mass, charge, and density of the charge carriers are often subtle concepts. 푚 Λ = 푛푒2 This equation, however, seems to imply that the crystal lattice which supports superconductivity is somehow invisible to the superconducting charges themselves. Further, to suggest that the charges flow without friction implies, as the Londons put it, “a premature theory.” Instead, the Londons desired a theory more in line with what Gorter and Casimir had conceived [3], whereby a persistent current is spontaneously generated to minimize the free energy of the system.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Analytical Solutions to Problems Using London Equations
    Module 3 : Superconductivity phenomenon Lecture 2 : Solution of London equations and free energy calculations Solution of London Equations for sample cases Flat slab in a magnetic field Consider a flat superconducting slab of thickness in a magnetic field parallel to the slab. The boundary condition is that field match at . Subject to this condition, the solution to the London equation , where is the microscopic value of the flux density, is easily determined to be a superposition of two exponentials. The result can be written as (13) Clearly, the minimum value of the flux density is attained at the mid-plane of the slab where it has a value . The field variation inside a superconducting slab is shown. Averaging this internal field over the sample thickness one gets (14) Let us consider the limit . This leads to deep inside the superconductor. In the other limit, i.e., , we expand . Therefore, approaches . Since , we get (15) As a consequence, magnetisation measurements can be made on thin films of known thicknesses and the penetration depth can be estimated from such measurements. Since the magnetisation is reduced below its Meissner value, the effective critical field for a thin sample is greater than that for bulk. The difference in the free energy between the normal state and the superconducting state is (16) For the case of complete flux expulsion, the above difference in free energies is (17) This energy, which stabilises the superconducting state is called the condensation energy and is called the thermodynamic critical field. For a thin film sample (with a field applied parallel to the plane) we get, (18) In terms of the bulk thermodynamic critical field (19) Critical current of a wire Consider a long superconducting wire having a circular cross-section of radius .
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Local Electrodynamics of Superconducting Wires: Implications for Flux Noise and Inductance
    Non-Local Electrodynamics of Superconducting Wires: Implications for Flux Noise and Inductance by Pramodh Viduranga Senarath Yapa Arachchige B.Sc., Carleton University, 2015 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in the Department of Physics and Astronomy c Pramodh Viduranga Senarath Yapa Arachchige, 2017 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopying or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Non-Local Electrodynamics of Superconducting Wires: Implications for Flux Noise and Inductance by Pramodh Viduranga Senarath Yapa Arachchige B.Sc., Carleton University, 2015 Supervisory Committee Dr. Rog´eriode Sousa, Supervisor (Department of Physics and Astronomy) Dr. Reuven Gordon, Outside Member (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering) iii Supervisory Committee Dr. Rog´eriode Sousa, Supervisor (Department of Physics and Astronomy) Dr. Reuven Gordon, Outside Member (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering) ABSTRACT The simplest model for superconductor electrodynamics are the London equations, which treats the impact of electromagnetic fields on the current density as a localized phenomenon. However, the charge carriers of superconductivity are quantum me- chanical objects, and their wavefunctions are delocalized within the superconductor, leading to non-local effects. The Pippard equation is the generalization of London electrodynamics which incorporates this intrinsic non-locality through the introduc- tion of a new superconducting characteristic length, ξ0, called the Pippard coherence length. When building nano-scale superconducting devices, the inclusion of the coher- ence length into electrodynamics calculations becomes paramount. In this thesis, we provide numerical calculations of various electrodynamic quantities of interest in the non-local regime, and discuss their implications for building superconducting devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultra-Low Temperature Measurements of London Penetration Depth in Iron Selenide Telluride Superconductors
    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses Fall 12-20-2013 Ultra-low Temperature Measurements of London Penetration Depth in Iron Selenide Telluride Superconductors Andrei Diaconu University of New Orleans, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Part of the Condensed Matter Physics Commons Recommended Citation Diaconu, Andrei, "Ultra-low Temperature Measurements of London Penetration Depth in Iron Selenide Telluride Superconductors" (2013). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 1731. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/1731 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ultra-low Temperature Measurements of London Penetration Depth in Iron Selenide Telluride Superconductors A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering and Applied Science Physics by Andrei Diaconu B.S. “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University, Iasi, Romania, 2006 M.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Processes in Disordered Superconductors
    COMENIUS UNIVERSITY IN BRATISLAVA FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS, PHYSICS AND INFORMATICS Physical processes in disordered superconductors 2016 RNDr. Martin Zemliˇckaˇ COMENIUS UNIVERSITY IN BRATISLAVA FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS, PHYSICS AND INFORMATICS Physical processes in disordered superconductors Dissertation thesis 4.1.3 Condensed matter physics and acoustics Department of experimental physics Bratislava, 2016 RNDr. Martin Zemliˇckaˇ 51249511 Comenius University in Bratislava Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics THESIS ASSIGNMENT Name and Surname: Mgr. Martin Žemlička Study programme: Condense Matter Physics and Acoustics (Single degree study, Ph.D. III. deg., full time form) Field of Study: Physics Of Condensed Matter And Acoustics Type of Thesis: Dissertation thesis Language of Thesis: English Secondary language: Slovak Title: Physical processes in disordered superconductors. Literature: 1. A Tholen, Parametric amplification with weak-link nonlinearity in superconducting microresonators, arXiv:0906.2744v2 2.G. Wendin, V.S. Shumeiko,Superconducting Quantum Circuits, Qubits and Computing arXiv:cond-mat/0508729v1 3. A. M. ZAGOSKIN, QUANTUM ENGINEERING, Cambridge University Press 2011 4. L. Skrbek a kol. Fyzika nízkých teplot, matfyzpress PRAHA 2011 Aim: The aim of the thesis is the examination of physical processes in disordered superconductors and nonlinear effects in superconducting nanostructures. Such structures can be applied as very sensitive detectors usable in astronomy, experimental physics or in quantum information processing. Tutor: doc. RNDr. Miroslav Grajcar, DrSc. Department: FMFI.KEF - Department of Experimental Physics Head of prof. Dr. Štefan Matejčík, DrSc. department: Assigned: 01.09.2012 Approved: 01.03.2012 prof. RNDr. Peter Kúš, DrSc. Guarantor of Study Programme Student Tutor 51249511 Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave Fakulta matematiky, fyziky a informatiky ZADANIE ZÁVEREČNEJ PRÁCE Meno a priezvisko študenta: Mgr.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving Pearl Vortices in Thin-Film Superconductors
    Article Moving Pearl Vortices in Thin-Film Superconductors Vladimir Kogan 1,* and Norio Nakagawa 2 1 Ames Laboratory—DOE, Ames, IA 50011, USA 2 Center for Nondestructive Evaluation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The magnetic field hz of a moving Pearl vortex in a superconducting thin-film in (x, y) plane is studied with the help of the time-dependent London equation. It is found that for a vortex at the origin moving in +x direction, hz(x, y) is suppressed in front of the vortex, x > 0, and enhanced behind (x < 0). The distribution asymmetry is proportional to the velocity and to the conductivity of normal quasiparticles. The vortex self-energy and the interaction of two moving vortices are evaluated. Keywords: thin films; Pearl vortex 1. Introduction The time-dependent Ginzburg–Landau equations (GL) are the major tool in modeling vortex motion. Although this approach is applicable only for gapless systems near the critical temperature [1], it is gauge invariant and reproduces correctly major features of the vortex motion. A simpler linear London approach has been employed through the years to describe static or nearly static vortex systems. The London equations express the basic Meissner effect and can be used at any temperature for problems where vortex cores are irrelevant. Moving vortices are commonly considered the same as static which are displaced as a Citation: Kogan, V.; Nakagawa, N. whole. Moving Pearl Vortices in Thin-Film However, recently it has been shown that this is not the case for moving vortex- Superconductors.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    CONTENTS 1 - Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 - A history of women and men ................................................................................... 1 1.2 - Experimental signs of superconductivity ................................................................. 1 1.2.1 - The discovery of superconductivity: the critical temperature ...................... 1 1.2.2 - The magnetic behavior of superconductors .................................................. 3 The MEISSNER-OCHSENFELD effect ....................................................................... 3 Critical fields and superconductors of types I and II ............................................. 3 1.2.3 - Critical current ............................................................................................... 3 1.2.4 - The isotope effect .......................................................................................... 4 1.2.5 - JOSEPHSON currents and flux quantification .................................................. 4 1.3 - Phenomenological models ........................................................................................ 5 1.3.1 - LONDON theory .............................................................................................. 5 1.3.2 - The thermodynamic approach ....................................................................... 6 1.3.3 - GINZBURG-LANDAU theory ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The London Equation
    Università degli Studi di Palermo Tesi di Dottorato SUPERCONDUCTIVITY EXPLAINED WITH THE TOOLS OF THE CLASSICAL ELECTROMAGNETISM Educational path for the secondary school and its experimentation Dottorando Sara Roberta Barbieri Tutor Coordinatore Prof. Claudio Fazio Prof. Aldo Brigaglia Co-Tutor Marco Giliberti SSD: Fis08 Università degli Studi di Palermo - Dipartimento di Fisica e Chimica Corso di Dottorato di Ricerca in Storia e Didattica delle Matematiche, della Fisica e della Chimica (XXIV Ciclo) – 2013 Università degli Studi di Palermo Tesi di Dottorato SUPERCONDUCTIVITY EXPLAINED WITH THE TOOLS OF THE CLASSICAL ELECTROMAGNETISM Educational path for the secondary school and its experimentation Dottorando Sara Roberta Barbieri Tutor Coordinatore Prof. Claudio Fazio Prof. Aldo Brigaglia Co-Tutor Marco Giliberti SSD: Fis08 Università degli Studi di Palermo - Dipartimento di Fisica e Chimica Corso di Dottorato di Ricerca in Storia e Didattica delle Matematiche, della Fisica e della Chimica (XXIV Ciclo) – 2013 Physics is such stuff as dreams are made on Contents Abstract 1 1. Introduction 3 2. The Higgs boson and the superconductivity 7 2.1. The Lagrangian formalism for the description of a system . .7 2.1.1. An example: the conservation of the linear momentum . .8 2.1.2. The importance of the theoretical framework . .9 2.2. The characterization of the unknown interactions . 10 2.2.1. Experimental hints for the description of the strong interaction 10 2.2.2. Theoretical hints for the description of the strong interaction . 11 2.3. The problem of the particle masses in the Standard Model . 14 2.3.1. Short range interactions are mediated by massive quanta .
    [Show full text]