Most Socially Active Professionals PDF Templates
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
September- October 2018
Lateral Partner Moves in London September- October 2018 REPRESENTATION – SEARCH – TEAM MOVES www.edwardsgibson.com Welcome to the latest round-up of lateral partner moves in the legal market from Edwards Gibson; where we look back at announced partner-level recruitment activity in London over the past two months and give you a ‘who’s moved where’ update. After a relatively subdued start to 2018, where at the half year point partner hires were down by nearly a quarter on 2017, there were 90 partner hires in this edition – 17% up on the same period last year and 18% up on the statistical average over the preceding 5 year period. The overall number of lateral hires was particularly high considering there were no large team moves consisting of three or more partners. A recurring theme of the past two years has been the sheer volume of partner hires in Corporate Crime/ Investigations and this round-up is no exception. Five firms, Addleshaw Goddard, BLM, DWF Kingsley Napley and RPC, have all announced lateral hires in this space, in two instances at the expense of the SFO. Also of note is the disproportionately high number of corporate tax moves – fully 7% of all hires recorded in this edition were in tax with partners joining DLA Piper, Greenberg Traurig, Katten Muchin Rosenman, Mayer Brown, Osborne Clarke and Wiggin. By far the most acquisitive firm over the past two months was White & Case which snapped up a half dozen new partners across a diverse range of practice areas from disputes to structured products. -
Court Fees the Government Response to Consultation on Proposals to Reform Fees for Grants of Probate
Court Fees The Government Response to consultation on proposals to reform fees for grants of probate February 2017 Court Fees The Government response to consultation on proposals to reform fees for grants of probate Presented to Parliament by the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice by Command of Her Majesty February 2017 Cm 9426 © Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: Court & Tribunal Fees Policy, Post Point 3.38, Ministry of Justice, 102 Petty France, SW1H 9AJ. Email: [email protected] Print ISBN 9781474141253 Web ISBN 9781474141260 ID 21021711 02/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Court Fees | The Government Response to consultation on proposals to reform fees for grants of probate Contents Introduction 3 Chapter 1 – Summary of Responses 5 Chapter 2 – Conclusions and Next Steps 10 Chapter 3 – Equalities Statement 14 Annex A: List of respondents 15 1 Court Fees | The Government Response to consultation on proposals to reform fees for grants of probate 2 Court Fees | The Government Response to consultation on proposals to reform fees for grants of probate Introduction 1. -
Your Guide to Choosing a Solicitor 2018/19
your guide to choosing a solicitor 2018/19 www.spinal.co.uk DM_ad_130mm x190mm_HR 18/07/2018 08:59 Page 1 ACCESSIBLE DESIGN By And For Disabled People Award-winning designer ADAM THOMAS, a wheelchair- user since 1981 has over 30 years’ experience of access issues. He is a leading authority on accessible kitchen design and has been involved in projects for the SIA HQ in Milton Keynes, Stoke Mandeville hospital, the Injured Jockey’s Fund and the Olympic Village London 2012. Through his work he has helped hundreds of clients regain their independence, including those affected by catastrophic injury and ABI. DESIGN MATTERS offers a comprehensive end-to-end service from design to installation with outstanding customer support. Each kitchen is tailored to the client’s requirements and provides a fully accessible, safe space that is entirely fit-for-purpose. Some of our clients even report reduced reliance on PAs. APPROVED Tel: 01628 531584 MEMBER www.dmkbb.co.uk 801128 SIA Healthcare A4 Advert_Layout 1 01/02/2018 14:20 Page 1 801128 SIAYOUr Healthcare A4 Advert_Layout 1 01/02/2018 dedicated 14:20 Page 1 home delivery service SIASIA Healthcare's Healthcare's 2,000th 2,000th Member Member GavinGavin Walker Walker OverOver 2,6 2,006 00SIA SIA membersmembers have have chosenchosen it. 9it.2% 9 2of% of SIA Healthcare SIA Healthcare members would members would recommend it* recommend it* SIA Healthcare is a dedicated Home Delivery Service that provides spinal cord injured people with SIA Healthcareall of their urology is a dedicated and stoma Home products Delivery and prescription Service that providesmedication spinal efficiently cord injuredand discreetly people to with all oftheir their door. -
High Court Judgment Template
Neutral Citation Number: [2020] EWHC 235 (Ch) INGENIOUS LITIGATION Claim Nos: HC-2015-002715, HC-2015-004581 HC-2017-000490, BL-2018-000279 BL-2018-001466, BL-2018-002554 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES BUSINESS LIST (ChD) Rolls Building, Royal Courts of Justice Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL Date: 10 February 2020 Before : MR JUSTICE NUGEE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : MR NIGEL ROWE & Others Claimants - and - INGENIOUS MEDIA HOLDINGS PLC & Others Defendants Claim Nos: HC-2015-004561, HC-2016-001674 HC-2017-001049, BL-2018-000507 And Between : MR ANTHONY BARNESS & Others Claimants - and - INGENIOUS MEDIA LTD & Others Defendants Claim No: FS-2017-000005 And Between : MR THOMAS AHEARNE & Others Claimants - and - PATRICK ANTHONY McKENNA & Others Defendants - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Nicholas Bacon QC (instructed by Stewarts Law LLP and Peters & Peters Solicitors LLP) for the Stewarts Claimants and the Peters & Peters Claimants P J Kirby QC (instructed by Stewarts Law LLP, Peters & Peters Solicitors LLP and Therium) for the Stewarts Claimants, the Peters & Peters Claimants and Therium Tom Mountford (instructed by Mishcon de Reya LLP) for the Mishcon de Reya Claimants Simon Birt QC, Craig Morrison and Geoffrey Kuehne (instructed by RPC) for the Ingenious Defendants Ben Quiney QC and Carlo Taczalski (instructed by Kennedys Law LLP) for SRLV (a firm) James Duffy and Nick Daly (instructed by Herbert Smith Freehills LLP) -
League Tables
GLOBAL LEGAL ADVISER LEAGUE TABLES H1 2016 H1 2016 LEGAL ADVISER RANKINGS LEGAL CAPITAL MARKETS The Bloomberg Capital Markets Tables represent the top arrangers, bookrunners and advisors across a broad array of deal types including loans, bonds, equity and M&A transactions; according to Bloomberg standards. LEAG<GO> for a full range of league tables MA<GO> for a full range of merger & acquisition tables Due to the dynamic nature of the Professional Service product, league table rankings may vary between this release and data found on the Bloomberg Professional Service. DATA SUBMISSIONS AND QUERIES Contact Phone Email Americas Paul Bandong +1 609 279 5187 [email protected] EMEA Dustin Jooste +44 20 3525 8902 [email protected] Asia-Pacific Hung Truong +65 6212 1326 [email protected] © 2016 Bloomberg Finance L.P. All rights reserved. Bloomberg Global Legal Adviser | H1 2016 Global Equity, Equity Linked & Rights: Legal Adviser - Issuer Ranked by Volume Ranked by Deal Count H1 2016 H1 2015 Mkt Deal Firm Rank Share(%) Count Mkt Volume (USD Deal Prev Prev Mkt Mkt Share Firm Rank Share(%) Mln) Count Rank Share(%) Chg(%) Latham & Watkins LLP 1 4.90 32 Latham & Watkins LLP 1 4.902 8,773 32 1 5.456 -0.554 Conyers Dill & Pearman 2 0.71 22 Vinson & Elkins LLP 2 3.973 7,109 21 9 2.304 1.669 Vinson & Elkins LLP 3 3.97 21 Linklaters LLP 3 3.438 6,153 10 6 2.883 0.555 Goodwin Procter LLP 4 1.23 18 Blake Cassels & Graydon LLP 4 2.890 5,171 10 51 0.521 2.369 White & Case LLP 5 2.775 4,965 10 15 1.457 1.318 King & Wood Mallesons 4 0.90 18 -
USER GUIDE FEATURES and BENEFITS Contents
NATIONAL PUBLIC SECTOR For the provision of LEGAL SERVICES REF: CPC/DU/LS/03A USER GUIDE FEATURES AND BENEFITS Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Framework Summary 3 3 Buying from the Framework 15 3.1 Direct Award 15 3.2 Further Competition 15 4 Further Competition Support Service 16 5 Placing an order 17 6 Contract and Account Management 18 7 Complaints and Escalation Procedures 18 8 Service Performance Expectations 19 9 Any Questions? 19 10 APPENDIX A – Supplier Account Manager Contact Details 20 11 APPENDIX B – Further Competition Template 22 12 APPENDIX C Further Competition Support Service Fee Structure 23 13 APPENDIX D – Example Framework Order Form 24 14 APPENDIX E – Access Agreement 25 15 APPENDIX F - Framework Weighting 26 Page 2 | National Public Sector Legal Services Framework User Guide Issue Two: September 2018 1. Introduction The Crescent Purchasing Consortium Limited has put in place an EU compliant framework for Legal Services reference CPC/DU/LS/03A (hereafter the framework). It is a proactive, best value, collaborative framework that can deliver your entire need for Legal Services. 2. Framework Summary The framework agreement is designed to be a one stop shop for an organisation’s entire Legal Services requirements across 14 Lots: • Lot 1 East Anglia • Lot 2 East Midlands • Lot 3 London • Lot 4 Northern Ireland • Lot 5 North East England • Lot 6 North West England • Lot 7 Scotland • Lot 8 South East England • Lot 9 South West England • Lot 10 Wales • Lot 11 West Midlands • Lot 12 Yorkshire • Lot 13 Channel Islands • Lot 14 National One-Stop-Shop CPC is pleased to make available to framework users a comprehensive range of Legal Services across each Lot. -
Knowledge Management in the Legal Profession 5-6 March 2002
These events qualify for up to 17 CPD hours Knowledge Management in the Legal Profession 5-6 March 2002 The Role of Professional Support Lawyer Expert contributions from: 7 March 2002 The Martin Tolhurst Partnership Solicitors Consignia Legal Services Berwin Leighton Paisner IBM Software Group Denton Wilde Sapte Book before Latham & Watkins Baker & McKenzie 7 January 2002 Blake Lapthorn and receive a Bevan Ashford CMS Cameron McKenna 10% discount Wragge & Co. Masons NautaDutilh Norton Rose Morgan Cole SJ Berwin produced by White & Case arkappliedgroup research & knowledge Linklaters & Alliance www.ark-group.com Pinsent Curtis Biddle researched by Horwath Consulting nowledge Baker Robbins & Co. Management K Hildebrandt International ManagingPartner Sherwood Consulting PSF Ltd. The essential guide to strategic practice management Knowledge Management in the Legal Profession Tuesday, 5 March 2002 8:30 Registration ! Structuring the team: who should be involved and when? ! Common obstacles to implementing a KM strategy: 9:15 Chair’s opening remarks people, processes and resources Andrew Terrett, Baker Robbins & Co. ! Carrying out an effective initial and regular ‘needs analysis’ of KM Ensuring knowledge management ! Linking KM into all operational areas: which ones are works to your advantage the most important to start with? 9:30 Maintaining competitive advantage through KM ! Linking KM into client info, client know-how, industry Ian Cowan, Baker Robbins & Co. knowledge, accounts, e-mails, research sites and websites ! Creating business -
Wednesday 11 November 2015 the Great Hall 1.00Pm–3.30Pm
This fair guide has been produced in association with Edgbaston, Birmingham, Wednesday 11 November 2015 B15 2TT, United Kingdom www.birmingham.ac.uk 11375 © University of Birmingham 2015. Printed on a recycled grade paper containing 100% post-consumer waste The Great Hall 1.00pm–3.30pm 11375 Careers Fair - Law Fair Cover_AW.indd 1-2 14/09/2015 14:19 Welcome to the Careers Network Law Fair. This event aims to provide Careers Network has a you with the opportunity to meet high quality employers face to face host of useful resources and discuss employment opportunities for vacation schemes and training contracts for 2017. information n ideas n vacancies n guidance n skills training Information p On occupations, employer research, further study, a year out, CV writing, completing applications, and much more Advice and guidance appointments Our Careers Advisers offer a arrange of appointments to provide careers support including: p General careers advice p CV checks p Practice Interviews These can be booked via Careers Connect at intranet.birmingham.ac.uk/careersconnect Employer presentations and workshops To help you through the recruitment process, come to our activity based sessions that will improve your confidence and performance, as well as help you research your ideas and make career-decisions. Sessions include: Interviews, Assessment Centres, Career Planning, Personal development training workshops, as well as Occupational and Industry specific events. Employer presentations during the Autumn term also provide an opportunity to meet employers and hear about what they can offer you. Visit our website at intranet.birmingham.ac.uk/careers for p News – all the latest happenings and updates p Vacancies p Employer events and career fairs Individually brilliant, p Links to employers and searchable databases of information collectively extraordinary p Sign up for events and workshops Offi ces worldwide. -
Inaugural One Day Conference Friday 22 January 2021
Inaugural One Day Conference Friday 22 January 2021 Registration from 08.45 Conference 09.15 - 17.05; Drinks reception 17.05 - 18.00 ARDL is pleased to announce details of its Inaugural Professional Discipline and Regulation Conference, which will take place on Friday 22 January 2021 at the Museum of London. There is a back-up date of Friday 26 March 2021 in the event that ARDL cannot hold the conference in January. The conference will be of interest to members of ARDL practising in all aspects of professional discipline and regulation and will involve updates on key developments and interesting insights from the 'coalface'. ‘Why Regulation Still Matters in 2021’ We are delighted to confirm that The Rt. Hon. Lord Dyson, former Master of the Rolls and Justice of the Supreme Court in the United Kingdom, has agreed to present the opening session of the conference. 'Corporate Governance for Public Bodies and Regulators – Has Regulation Failed?' ARDL welcomes David Gomez, author of the leading healthcare regulatory law textbook "The Regulation of Healthcare Professionals: Law, Principle and Process (2nd Ed. Sweet & Maxwell)" and a well-known lawyer in the field of regulation and professional discipline, latterly as the senior lawyer at the Professional Standards Authority, to present this key address. Conference Speakers include: Jonathan Dillon, Executive Director of Fitness to Practise, Social Work England 'Why a Regulator Established in 2019 Looks a Little Different' Kenneth Hamer, Henderson Chambers 'Regulatory Case Law Update' James Stuart, -
CLLS Reg Law Committee
Minutes of Meeting of the City of London Law Society Regulatory Law Committee (the "Committee") Held on Tuesday 8 October 2019 at 12.30pm at Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Exchange House, 12 Primrose Street, London, EC2A 2EG ATTENDEES Present Firm Represented Karen Anderson (Chair) Herbert Smith Freehills LLP Peter Bevan Linklaters LLP Simon Crown Clifford Chance LLP Richard Everett Travers Smith LLP Angela Hayes TLT LLP Mark Kalderon Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP Brian McDonnell Addleshaw Goddard LLP Hannah Meakin Norton Rose Fulbright LLP Rob Moulton Latham & Watkins LLP Stuart Willey White & Case LLP 1. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 10 September 2019 were approved. 2. HMT CALL FOR EVIDENCE ON THE FINANCIAL SERVICES FUTURE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK REVIEW (REGULATORY CO-ORDINATION) Further to the September meeting, a member had been in contact with IRSG to discuss its response to this paper. It was agreed that the outcomes of the discussion would be fed back to the Committee. It was agreed that a member would prepare a draft response setting out the Committee's views, which, if appropriate, would reflect the discussions being held with the IRSG. The members confirmed that they had no specific points to raise on the substance of the paper and were supportive of the aims of the review. 3. LAW COMMISSION CALL FOR EVIDENCE ON INTERMEDIATED SECURITIES The member who had considered this paper in more detail following the September meeting presented the issues which appeared of most relevance to the Committee. The Committee discussed the question considering whether insolvency in an intermediated securities chain should be considered from a legal rather than regulatory perspective. -
First Briefing, May 2021 – Scheme Funding in the Legal Sector
First Briefing, May 2021 – Scheme funding in the legal sector Many legal firms prepare their statutory accounts as at 30 April. This briefing looks at some of the issues these firms face when preparing this year’s FRS 102 pension disclosures. It includes analysis of the majority of legal firms with a Defined Benefit pension scheme (33 schemes across 30 firms). Contact us for a free benchmarking report to find out how the funding of your scheme compares to others in the sector. Change in assets since 30 April 2020 Financial conditions over the year have been mixed as markets looked to recover from the pandemic-induced volatility we saw in the first quarter of 2020. Equities have performed well, with positive returns over the year averaging from 25% to 30%. Bond yields have risen significantly so far in 2021, meaning that the values of government and corporate bond holdings are generally lower than they were at the start of the year. Overall, the impact on individual schemes will vary according to the investment strategy adopted. Schemes with higher allocations to equities will have seen their assets increase, whereas schemes with high bond allocations may have seen a reduction in assets over the year (although as we discuss in the next section, this may have been offset by a reduction in liabilities).1 Global equities: +30% UK equities: +25% Average DGF: +10% Index-linked gilts: 0% Corporate bonds -5% Fixed-interest gilts: -15% © First Actuarial LLP 2021 all rights reserved. The information contained in this bulletin is, to the best of our knowledge and belief, correct at the time of writing. -
The Largest Commercial Law Firms in the UK Ranked by Revenue
UK Top 50 2018-19 The largest commercial law firms in the UK ranked by revenue Rank Rank Revenue Change in Average PEP Change Total Change in total Total equity Change in total Revenue per Profit per lawyer Firm Leverage (2018-19) (2017-18) (£m) revenue (£k) in PEP partners partners partners equity partners lawyer (£k) (£k) 1 1 DLA Piper (1) 2111.0 2.8% 1,395 1.9% 1245.7 3.4% 401.0 -0.7% 570.3 151.0 8.2 2 2 Clifford Chance 1693.0 4.3% 1,620 1.3% 562 0.9% 394.0 0.5% 700.7 263.7 5.1 3 6 Linklaters 1628.7 6.9% 1,690 9.9% 464.2 0.9% 442.5 0.6% 692.7 319.7 4.3 4 4 Allen & Overy 1627.0 3.4% 1,660 1.2% 536 -0.4% 388.0 -0.3% 687.7 271.8 5.1 5 3 Hogan Lovells (1) 1577.0 -0.6% 1,029 2.9% 803 -3.9% 523.0 -5.9% 598.3 204.1 4.0 6 7 Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer 1472.0 4.9% 1,839 5.5% 377 -4.3% 370.0 -5.6% 993.9 464.6 3.0 7 5 Norton Rose Fulbright (1) 1466.0 -3.9% 675 0.7% 1166.3 -3.8% 681.4 -4.6% 434.3 136.3 4.0 8 8 CMS (2) 1204.0 6.2% 582 1.4% 1041.5 -0.5% 601.9 0.7% 325.3 93.2 5.1 9 9 Herbert Smith Freehills 965.7 4.2% 949 11.4% 452 -2.6% 323.0 -0.6% 461.4 146.5 5.5 10 10 Eversheds Sutherland (3) 875.0 8.7% 865 2.4% 739 9.0% 198.8 4.1% 362.6 71.3 11.1 11 n/a Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (4) 669.0 n/a 627 n/a 544.2 n/a 280.7 n/a 469.6 123.5 4.1 12 12 Ashurst 641.0 13.7% 972 30.8% 392 4.8% 241.0 0.8% 453.0 165.5 4.9 13 13 Clyde & Co 611.0 10.8% 690 4.5% 430 5.7% 219.0 2.8% 355.2 87.8 6.9 14 11 Slaughter and May **(5) 590.0 3.3% 2,300 n/a 109 -2.7% 102.0 -3.8% 1092.6 434.4 4.3 15 15 Pinsent Masons 475.0 5.6% 620 -5.1% 447 4.4% 183.0 2.8% 302.4 71.2