THE SHAPING of SOUTH AFRICAN THEATRE: an OVERVIEW of MAJOR TRENDS by Temple Hauptfleisch 1. INTRODUCTION: CHANGED CONCEPTS of H
In: Arndt and Berndt. Words and Worlds. African Writing, Literature, and Society – A Commemorative Publication in Honor of Eckhard Breitinger. Africa World Press, 2007. This is an expanded version of the German article called “Sudafrikanisches Theater – Entwicklungen und Strömungenvon Vergangenehit bis Gegenwart”. In Kreatives Afrika. Schriftstellerinnen über Literatur. Theater und Gesselschaft. Einer Festschrift für Eckhard Breitinger (Hrsg. Susan Arndt und Katrin Brendt). Wuppertal: Peter Hammer Verlag, 2005 THE SHAPING OF SOUTH AFRICAN THEATRE: AN OVERVIEW OF MAJOR TRENDS By Temple Hauptfleisch University of Stellenbosch South Africa 1. INTRODUCTION: CHANGED CONCEPTS OF HISTORY The radical changes in political, social and cultural thinking in the world, and in Africa in particular, over the past twenty years have significantly affected concepts of historiography and have caused major re-evaluations of accepted histories across the world. This sense of (re)discovery has had a similar impact on the cultural history of South Africa. It has meant rediscovering lost (or discovering new) facts, redefining principles of historiography, reinterpreting the old, and ultimately seeking to write a new history. The most fundamental issue of course is to discover and learn to deal with fact and (real and potential) influence of the vast treasure-trove of events and artefacts produced before and during the colonised period, but ignored, denied or undervalued by commentators in the past. This situation, the processes involved and the causes for it all, are not unique to, or in any way limited to, South Africa of course, as the history of any former colony will testify. However the political history of Southern Africa the country has so entrenched a specific way of thinking that any wider awareness of tradition and cultural riches encompassing anything more than purely colonial values was virtually impossible till very late in the 20th century, except as a radical, oppositional, esoteric, or possibly even eccentric, area of study and contemplation.
[Show full text]