The Racialization and Exploitation of Foreign Workers by the Law

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Racialization and Exploitation of Foreign Workers by the Law City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2017 The Racialization and Exploitation of Foreign Workers by the Law Seiko Ishikawa The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2318 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] THE RACIALIZATION AND EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN WORKERS BY THE LAW by SEIKO ISHIKAWA A master’s thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Liberal Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, The City University of New York 2017 © 2017 Seiko Ishikawa All Rights Reserved ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Liberal Studies in satisfaction of the thesis requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Date Monica W. Varsanyi Thesis Advisor Date Elizabeth Macaulay-Lewis Executive Officer THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract THE RACIALIZATION AND EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN WORKERS BY THE LAW by Seiko Ishikawa Advisor: Professor Monica W. Varsanyi Intense demand for cheap labor in the United States has resulted in a widespread effect of employing high skilled immigrants in STEM fields. Examining how companies use high-skilled visa categories to create a flexible cheaper immigrant workforce, this paper demonstrates that skilled immigrants from Asia are being exploited through neutral skills-based criteria that are de facto racially biased. The purpose of this paper is to raise awareness of how, from the perspective of law and society, skills-based immigration works primarily to benefit the technological industry rather than skilled immigrants. iv Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 Chapter One: Literature Review 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 8 1.2 The Gap between Law on the Books and Law in Action ............................8 1.3 The Current National Orgins Formula .......................................................12 1.4 Demographic Diversity in the High Tech Fields .......................................15 1.5 Skilled Immigrants and De Facto Discrimination .....................................17 1.6 Asian Immigration in De Just Immigration Law .......................................22 1.7 Conclusion .................................................................................................25 Chapter Two: Skills-Based Immigration and U.S. Policy 2.1 Introduction ...............................................................................................27 2.2 Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 and 1990 .................................27 2.3 Per Country Limit .....................................................................................29 2.4 Non-immigrant Status and the H-1B Visa ................................................30 2.5 Immigration Status Discrimination ...........................................................34 2.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................35 Chapter Three: Skills-Based Immigrants in the U.S. 3.1 Introduction ...............................................................................................37 3.2 A General Distribution of H-1B Visa Petitions ........................................37 3.3 Country of Birth ........................................................................................39 3.4 Age of H-1B Holders ................................................................................39 3.5 Technology Occupations ..........................................................................41 3.6 Education and Ethnicity ............................................................................43 3.7 Occupation of H-1B Holders ....................................................................45 3.8 H-1B by Annual Compensation ................................................................47 3.9 H-1B by Industry and Sponsors ................................................................49 3.10 Skilled Indian Workers ...........................................................................51 3.11 Conclusion ..............................................................................................54 Chapter Four: Contesting Availabilities 4.1 Introduction ...............................................................................................56 4.2 Skill Shortage vs. Aggregate Shortages ....................................................57 4.3 Politics of the H-1B ..................................................................................62 4.4 Intention of Increase .................................................................................63 4.5 Bipartisan and Non-Immigration Visa policy Reform ..............................65 4.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................66 Chapter Five: De Jure and De Facto 5.1 Introduction ...............................................................................................68 5.2 Rules of Prevailing Wage Ignored or Broken ...........................................68 5.3 Disclose Cheap Exploitable Labor ............................................................74 5.4 Indentured Servants and Skilled Indian Workers .....................................78 5.5 Substitution for Skilled Labor Force: the B-1 Visa ..................................80 5.6 Narrative of the OPT Extension for STEM students ................................82 5.7 Benefit and Drawbacks of the H-1B .........................................................89 5.8 Conclusion ................................................................................................91 v Chapter Six: Conclusion ..............................................................................................93 References ....................................................................................................................97 vi Introduction As immigration to the United States has tripled between the 1990s1 and 2010s,2 bringing in diverse peoples from all around the developing world,3 immigration scholarship has carefully examined and researched elements of discrimination4 contained in the development of American immigration law and policy. In this paper, I focus on the temporary employment5 of skilled foreign workers in the American STEM (science, 1 The 1990s was a significant period for immigration policies. During that era Congress began a serious discussion on immigration reform. The 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA), Pub.L.99-603, was a modified version of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. It increased the totality of immigrants to 700,000 immigrants per year for the fiscal years 1992-94, and 675,000 per year after that. This act preserved family-based immigration visas, while more than doubling employment-related immigration, created five distinct employment-based visas categorized by occupation, and instituted the Diversity Visa Program, which created a lottery to admit immigrants from countries where their citizenry was underrepresented in the U.S. There were also changes in non-immigration visas, such as the H-1B visa, one of the temporary employment-based visas for skilled workers, which is the main subject of this paper. Historical Overview of Immigration Policy. Center for Immigration Studies. Retrieved from http://cis.org/ImmigrationHistoryOverview. 2 According to U.S. Homeland Security, an estimated 13.2 million lawful permanent residents (LPRs), or green card holders, were living in the United States on January 1, 2014. Sixty-four percent of the LPR population in 2014 obtained permanent residence in 2000 or later. Thirty-two percent gained LPR status between 1990 and 2004. Lee, James & Baker, Bryan. (2014, January) Estimates of the Lawful Permanent Resident Population in the United States. U.S. Homeland Security. Moreover, the Department of State (DOS) published the 2015 annual report of immigrant visa applicants, revealing an overall decrease from 9,011,295 in 2015 to 8,626,625 in 2016. This total decreases both family-based and employment-based green cards. However, only reflect petitions do not include the number of applications held with the USCIS Offices. Immigrant visa issuances during fiscal year 2017 will be limited no more 226,000 in the family- sponsored preferences and 140,000 in the employment-based preferences. Annual Report of Immigration Visa Applicants in the Family-sponsored and Employment-based preferences Registered at the National Visa Center as of November 1, 2016. 3 Monger, Randall. & Yankay, James. (2014, May). U.S. Lawful Permanent Residents: 2013. Homeland Security. Office of Immigration Statistics Annual Flow Report, pp.9. 4 After the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965 abolished a quota system based on national origin, immigrants were accused of bringing crime, stealing jobs from native-born Americans, and being tax parasites. Even though the Equal Protection Clause generally requires strict scrutiny of racial classification within the law, racism, along
Recommended publications
  • Regulating Foreign Labor in Emerging Economies: Between National Objectives and International Commitments
    E-ISSN 2281-4612 Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Vol 10 No 3 May 2021 ISSN 2281-3993 www.richtmann.org . Research Article © 2021 Aries Harianto. This is an open access article licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) Received: 25 September 2020 / Accepted: 9 April 2021 / Published: 10 May 2021 Regulating Foreign Labor in Emerging Economies: Between National Objectives and International Commitments Aries Harianto Universitas Jember, Jalan Kalimantan No. 37, Kampus Tegal Boto, Jember, Jawa Timur 68121, Indonesia DOI: https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0092 Abstract The dialectics of the regulation of foreign workers, is a problematic indication as a legal problem in Indonesian legislation. This article aims to describe the urgency of critical studies concerning the regulation of foreign workers by exploring existing legal problems with national commitments to ratify international agreements regarding free trade, with a case study in Indonesia. By using normative and juridical approach with a variety of approaches both the law approach, conceptual approach, case approach and comparative approach, the study found that the regulation there is an inconsistency clause regarding special competencies that must be owned by foreign workers, including the selection and use of terminology in Act No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower. Thus, this study offers a constitutional solution due to the regulation of the subordinate foreign workers on international trade commitments which in turn negate the constitutional goals of creating the welfare of domestic workers. The normative consequences that immediately bind Indonesia after integrating itself in the World Trade Organization (WTO) membership are services trade agreements that are contained in the regulations of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS).
    [Show full text]
  • The Migration Phenomenon in East Asia: Towards a Theological Response from God's People As a Host Community
    The migration phenomenon in East Asia: Towards a theological response from God's people as a host community [Published by Regnum in 2015 as: Theologising Migration: Otherness and Liminality in East Asia] Paul Woods This dissertation is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Theology) of AGST Alliance 2012 I declare that this dissertation is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a qualification at any tertiary education institution. Paul Woods.................................................................................... Abstract This dissertation works towards a theological response from the East Asian church to intra-regional migration. It provides an introduction to migration theory and the experiences of people on the move, as the basis of a theological reflection. Migration is a significant part of modern life, and the Asian church has begun to respond and reach out to migrants. However, this concern for the Other (someone different and distinct from oneself) is patchy and lacks robust theological foundations. Migration brings those in the host countries face to face with racial and social Others, who may face ill-treatment and exploitation, to which the church is sometimes perceived as indifferent. The principal motifs employed in the work are Otherness and liminality. Through these, this research explores the commandments in the Pentateuch which require fair treatment of the alien in Israel. A similar approach is applied to Christ’s life and teaching and the example of the early church in the New Testament. The same motifs of Otherness and liminality are used to examine the status of God’s followers before Him and other nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Instructions for the 2021 Diversity Immigrant Visa Program (Dv-2021)
    UNCLASSIFIED INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE 2021 DIVERSITY IMMIGRANT VISA PROGRAM (DV-2021) Program Overview The Department of State annually administers the statutorily-mandated Diversity Immigrant Visa Program. Section 203(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) provides for a class of immigrants known as “diversity immigrants” from countries with historically low rates of immigration to the United States. For Fiscal Year 2021, 55,000 Diversity Visas (DVs) will be available. There is no cost to register for the DV program. Applicants who are selected in the program (selectees) must meet simple but strict eligibility requirements to qualify for a diversity visa. The Department of State determines selectees through a randomized computer drawing. The Department of State distributes diversity visas among six geographic regions, and no single country may receive more than seven percent of the available DVs in any one year. For DV-2021, natives of the following countries are not eligible to apply, because more than 50,000 natives of these countries immigrated to the United States in the previous five years: Bangladesh, Brazil, Canada, China (mainland-born), Colombia, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, India, Jamaica, Mexico, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, South Korea, United Kingdom (except Northern Ireland) and its dependent territories, and Vietnam. Persons born in Hong Kong SAR, Macau SAR, and Taiwan are eligible. Eligibility Requirement #1: Individuals born in countries whose natives qualify may be eligible to enter. If you were not born in an eligible country, there are two other ways you might be able to qualify. Was your spouse born in a country whose natives are eligible? If yes, you can claim your spouse’s country of birth – provided that both you and your spouse are named on the selected entry, are found eligible and issued diversity visas, and enter the United States simultaneously.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Migration from Indonesia
    LABOUR MIGRATION FROM INDONESIA IOM is committed to the principle that humane and orderly migration benets migrants and society. As an intergovernmental body, IOM acts with its partners in the international community to assist in meeting the operational challenges of migration; advance understanding of migration issues; encourage social and economic development through migration; and uphold the human dignity and wellbeing of migrants. This publication is produced with the generous nancial support of the Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration (United States Government). Opinions expressed in this report are those of the contributors and do not necessarily reect the views of IOM. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher: International Organization for Migration Mission in Indonesia LABOUR MIGRATION FROM INDONESIA Sampoerna Strategic Square, North Tower Floor 12A Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav. 45-46 An Overview of Indonesian Migration to Selected Destinations in Asia and the Middle East Jakarta 12930 Indonesia © 2010 International Organization for Migration (IOM) IOM International Organization for Migration IOM International Organization for Migration Labour Migration from Indonesia TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vii PREFACE ix EXECUTIVE SUMMARY xi ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Purpose 3 Terminology 3 Methodology
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration Compliance Alert
    VEDDERPRICE ® November 2009 Immigration Compliance Alert ICE Increases I-9 Audit Actions foreign nationals in H-1B (Specialty Occupation) and L-1 (Intracompany Transferee) immigration status. The USCIS Fraud In July 2009, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Detection and National Security unit (FDNS) has initiated these (ICE) notiS ed 652 businesses that they had been targeted visits as part of the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) for in-person inspections of their I-9 Employment Eligibility efforts to expand worksite enforcement. USCIS has hired a Veri cation Forms. This recent enforcement initiative is part of large number of private contractors to conduct thousands of the government’s efforts to hold employers accountable for their site visits and verify information from the I-129 petitions led hiring practices and ensure a legal workforce across the country. with the agency. John Morton, Assistant Secretary for ICE, has stated, “ICE is As part of these site visits, the FDNS assessors may visit committed to establishing a meaningful inspection program to the workplace unannounced or with very short notice. Typically, promote compliance with the law.” He added that the nationwide they will ask questions of nonimmigrant workers, administrative effort was a rst step in ICE’s long-term strategy to address personnel and supervisors. Most questions will directly relate and deter illegal employment by focusing on employers rather to the information submitted with the I-129 petitions in order to than on undocumented workers. In all of scal year 2008, ICE con rm accuracy. FDNS assessors may ask to review issued only 503 similar notices to employers.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration Act of 1924 from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Immigration Act of 1924 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Immigration Act of 1924, or Johnson–Reed Act, including the National Origins Act, and Asian Exclusion Act (Pub.L. 68-139, 43 Stat. 153, enacted May 26, 1924), was a United States federal law that limited the annual number of immigrants who could be admitted from any country to 2% of the number of people from that country who were already living in the United States in 1890, down from the 3% cap set by the Immigration Restriction Act of 1921, according to the Census of 1890. It superseded the 1921 Emergency Quota Act. The law was aimed at further restricting the Southern and Eastern Europeans, mainly Jews fleeing persecution in Poland and Russia, who were immigrating in large numbers starting in the 1890s, as well as prohibiting the immigration President Coolidge signs the of Middle Easterners, East Asians and Indians. According to the U.S. immigration act on the White House Department of State Office of the Historian, "In all its parts, the most basic South Lawn along with appropriation purpose of the 1924 Immigration Act was to preserve the ideal of American bills for the Veterans Bureau. John J. homogeneity."[1] Congressional opposition was minimal. Pershing is on the President's right. Contents 1 Provisions 2 History 3 Results 4 See also 5 References 6 Sources 7 External links Provisions The Immigration Act made permanent the basic limitations on immigration into the United States established in 1921 and modified the National Origins Formula established then. In conjunction with the Immigration Act of 1917, it governed American immigration policy until the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, which revised it completely.
    [Show full text]
  • The Temporary Foreign Worker Program in Canada: Low-Skilled Workers As an Extreme Form of Flexible Labor
    FUDGE&MACPHAILARTICLE31-1.DOCX 10/13/2009 4:51 PM THE TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKER PROGRAM IN CANADA: LOW-SKILLED WORKERS AS AN EXTREME FORM OF FLEXIBLE LABOR Judy Fudge† and Fiona MacPhail†† I. INTRODUCTION The Canadian federal government is promoting temporary foreign migration for economic reasons and specifically to promote economic growth.1 In The Budget Plan 2007, the federal government characterized the Temporary Foreign Worker Program (TFWP) as its “principal tool to help employers meet immediate skill requirements when qualified Canadian workers cannot be found.”2 It also recognized the regional nature of the program; “in the Alberta oil sands and the construction sector in British Columbia, the program has become increasingly important for businesses in their efforts to remain competitive in Canada’s booming economy.”3 The federal government also promised improvements to the program that would make it easier for employers to access temporary migrant workers but that would also “not result in reduced employment opportunities for Canadians.”4 The federal government’s focus on the needs of employers in Canada and the Canadian labor market is reflected in Canada’s treatment of the international instruments regarding migrant workers. Like most receiving countries, Canada has not ratified the instruments that provide rights for † Professor and Lansdowne Chair, Faculty of Law, University of Victoria, Canada. †† Associate Professor, Department of Economics, University of North British Columbia, Canada. We would both like to thank Mark Thompson for his very helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Judy Fudge would like also to thank the SSHRC for supporting the research upon which this article was based, and Emma Lehrer and Cam Wardell for their research assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • International Labour Standards on Migrant Workers' Rights
    International Labour Standards on Migrant Workers’ Rights *XLGHIRU3ROLF\PDNHUVDQG3UDFWLWLRQHUVLQ$VLDDQGWKH3DFL¿F INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE BANGKOK 2007 Copyright © International Labour Organization 2007 First published 2007 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to the Publications Bureau (Rights and Permissions), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered in the United Kingdom with the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP [Fax: (+44) (0)20 7631 5500; email: [email protected], in the United States with the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923 [Fax: (+1) (978) 750 4470, email: [email protected]] or in other countries with associated Reproduction Rights Organizations, may make photocopies in accordance with the licenses issued to them for this purpose. ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ILO International Labour Standards on Migrant Workers’ Rights: Guide for Policymakers and Practitioners in Asia and the Pacific Bangkok, International Labour Office, 2007 English edition Print: ISBN 978-92-2-120246-2, Web pdf: ISBN 978-92-2-120247-9,
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity Visa “Green Card” Lottery to Open Soon
    RESPONSIVE SOLUTIONS Diversity Visa “Green Card” Lottery to Open Soon Countries with high rates of immigration are NOT qualified. These Failure to obtain a visa to the US between October 1 and September typically include Brazil, China, the Dominican Republic, 30 of the government year following selection will result in El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, India, Jamaica, Mexico, Poland, and disqualification from the program, so selected applicants will need the UK among others. By contrast, most African and European to act on their visa applications quickly. Although it’s possible to countries are typically eligible. Nationality is determined by the apply for the lottery from the US, those who are unlawfully present country of birth of the applicant, his or her spouse, or parents in the US will rarely be eligible to receive a green card. (provided certain requirements are met). FRAUD WARNING Last year, the government received over 14 million entries for the Every year, fraudulent websites pose as the official U.S. government 50,000 available visas. Counties with the highest number of winners site and charge applicants money to “register”. Be wary of anyone included Nigeria, Ukraine and Ethiopia. seeking to collect a registration or filing fee for assistance in HOW TO APPLY submitting an application. The government does not charge a fee for submitting the application. Only Internet sites that end with To enter the lottery, the foreign national must submit an electronic the .gov domain are official U.S. government websites. Others application through the official U.S. Department of State website should not be trusted, and in no case should you send any personal (http://travel.state.gov) during a specified time each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Migrating to Opportunity: Overcoming Barriers to Labor Mobility in Southeast Asia
    Migrating to Opportunity Migrating to Opportunity Overcoming Barriers to Labor Mobility in Southeast Asia Mauro Testaverde, Harry Moroz, Claire H. Hollweg, and Achim Schmillen © 2017 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved 1 2 3 4 20 19 18 17 This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifically reserved. Rights and Permissions This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo. Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, you are free to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt this work, including for commercial purposes, under the following conditions: Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: Testaverde, Mauro, Harry Moroz, Claire H. Hollweg, and Achim Schmillen.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Work Permit for Foreigners
    ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE LAW ON THE WORK PERMITS FOR FOREIGNERS –No.4817 TYPES OF WORK PERMITS PROCESS OF APPLICATION TO WORK PERMITS EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR WORK PERMITS EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR WORK PERMITS (SPECIAL FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENTS) THE COORDINATION COUNCIL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENT IN TURKEY (YOİKK) 2 ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE GENERAL DIRECTOR DEPUTY OF GENERAL DEPUTY OF GENERAL DEPUTY OF GENERAL DIRECTOR DIRECTOR DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF WORK DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN LEGISLATION AND PERMIT FOR FOREIGNERS RESOURCES AND FISCAL INDIVIDUAL LABOUR SERVICES RELATIONS. DEPARTMENT OF MIGRATION AND FOREIGN EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF UNIONS STATISTICS DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT OF POLICIES COLLECTIVE LABOUR AGREEMENT AND OFFICIAL MEDIATION 3 DEPARTMENT OF WORK PERMIT FOR FOREIGNERS To implement Act 4817 and relevant regulations To assess and conclude the applications of work permit of foreigners in Turkey. 4 DEPARTMENT OF MIGRATION AND FOREIGN EMPLOYMENT To implement Act 4817 and Act 4875 (about Foreign Direct Investment) and relevant regulations. To analyze sectoral and regional impact of labour migration inflows. To make contribution to national policies on migration and employment of foreign workers. 5 LAW ON THE WORK PERMITS FOR FOREIGNERS –No.4817 The work permits of foreigners with a few exceptions are granted by the Department of Work Permits for Foreigners and The Department Of Migration and Foreign Employment under the General Directorate of Labour since 2003. 6 PURPOSE OF
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration Law 101
    Immigration Law 101 April 7, 2020 Immigration Law 101 April 7, 2020 Agenda 3:30pm – 4:30pm Intro and Understanding the Immigration System Immigration Laws and Policies INS v. DHS Immigration Agencies and their roles Mary Armistead, Esq. Determining Immigration Status Citizenship Immigration status: Immigrant, Nonimmigrant, Undocumented Immigrant: family, employment, diversity, humanitarian Nonimmigrant: employment, student, visitor, and others Michelle Lee, Esq. Jon Lemelin The Immigration Process Admission Inadmissibility and Deportability Mary Armistead, Esq. 4:30pm – 5:30pm Understanding Immigration Enforcement Who can enforce immigration laws Where and how does immigration enforcement occur Removal Proceeding basics Mary Armistead, Esq. Michelle Lee, Esq. Obtaining Lawful status Family-based Humanitarian-based Isabelle Thacker, Esq. Immigration Related Developments and Policy Executive orders Regulatory changes Prof. Ava Ayers IMMIGRATION LAW 101 April 7, 2020 SPEAKER BIOGRAPHIES MARY ARMISTEAD, ESQ., works at The Legal Project as an Equal Justice Works Crime Victims Justice Corps Fellow providing direct representation to and building community capacity regarding victims of human trafficking. Mary also teaches Immigration Law as an Adjunct Professor of Law at her alma mater, Albany Law School, where she graduated summa cum laude. Mary clerked at the New York State Court of Appeals for one year before working as the Staff Attorney of the Immigration Law Clinic at Albany Law School, both supervising students and maintaining a personal docket representing clients eligible for humanitarian immigration relief. In her positions at Albany Law School and The Legal Project, she developed the Special Immigrant Juvenile Pro Bono Attorney panel, wherein she connects clients to and supervises attorneys in providing pro bono representation to vulnerable immigrant children.
    [Show full text]