Firing for Effect, the Use of Field Artillery in the Normandy Campaign

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Firing for Effect, the Use of Field Artillery in the Normandy Campaign Southern New Hampshire University Firing For Effect, The Use of Field Artillery in the Normandy Campaign A Capstone Project Submitted to the College of Online and Continuing Education in Partial Fulfillment of the Master of Arts in History By David F. Lloyd Framingham, Massachusetts September 2018 Copyright © 2018 by David F. Lloyd All Rights Reserved ii Student: David F. Lloyd I certify that this student has met the requirements for formatting the capstone project and that this project is suitable for preservation in the University Archive. September 20, 2018 __________________________________________ _______________ Southern New Hampshire University Date College of Online and Continuing Education iii Abstract Unlike today’s global political situation, World War II was a time of great cooperation between nations, the Allies that encountered and defeated the Axis powers in Europe and the Japanese in the Pacific basin. This cooperation extended down to the battlefield, where individual types of military units operated in concert with each other to present an integrated front to their adversaries. Field artillery units represented one component of this highly-integrated battlefield, contributing heavily to Allied victories around the globe. Nowhere is the use of field artillery better demonstrated than during Operation OVERLORD, the campaign to invade Northern Europe in June of 1944. Historians have however generally ignored the use of field artillery during Operation OVERLORD, instead understandably choosing to concentrate on the D-Day Allied landings on the Normandy beaches, an operation that represents one of the most dramatic days in the history of modern warfare. Those historians that do address the following Normandy Campaign (the Campaign) to gain an Allied foothold in Northern Europe address the campaign more from the perspective of the invading Allied infantry, while largely ignoring the contribution made by the field artillery. This work will examine in detail the use of field artillery during Operation OVERLORD in an effort to gauge the contribution that artillery made to the overall Campaign. By using secondary sources to discuss the planning and execution of the Operation, it will provide the reader with an understanding of how OVERLORD came into existence, how it was planned and how the Campaign unfolded. Then, by using archival primary-source material, compiled iv contemporaneously by the field artillery units involved in the Campaign, it will demonstrate that the use of field artillery was vital to the Allied victory in Northern France in June of 1944. Dedication This work is dedicated to then Lieutenant John R. Lloyd, forward observer with the 230th Field Artillery Battalion, 30th Infantry Division, United States Army. His work as an artillery observer during the Normandy Campaign helped to rid Europe of fascist aggression during World War II, the greatest global conflict in modern history. The work is also dedicated to Seaman Erik R. Lloyd, proudly serving his nation as a Corpsman with the United States Navy, and to all those who have ever donned a uniform in the service of this country. v Acknowledgments Thank you to all the faculty and students at Southern New Hampshire who supported me in developing and reviewing this work. A very special thank you to my wife, personal advisor and chief proofreader Sharon, who has put up with my often erratic and taxing behavior over the years and without whose help and everlasting patience and support my academic career would not be possible. vi Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... iv Dedication ........................................................................................................................................v Acknowledgments.......................................................................................................................... vi List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. viii List of Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................... ix Glossary ...........................................................................................................................................x Cast of Characters ........................................................................................................................ xiii Chapter 1: Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 Chapter 2: Research Methods and Use of Sources ..........................................................................7 Chapter 3: Historiographic Discussion ..........................................................................................12 Chapter 4: The Invasion Idea .........................................................................................................16 Chapter 5: Operation OVERLORD ...............................................................................................25 Chapter 6: Invasion Planning and Organization ............................................................................31 Chapter 7: Eisenhower and the Final Plan .....................................................................................40 Chapter 8: A Brief History of Field Artillery ................................................................................49 Chapter 9: The Normandy Batteries ..............................................................................................64 Chapter 10: In the East, Omaha Beach to St. Lo ...........................................................................68 Chapter 11: In the West, Utah Beach to Cherbourg ......................................................................86 Chapter 12: Conclusion................................................................................................................102 Appendix A: Military Map Symbols ...........................................................................................106 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................107 vii List of Figures Figure 1: Operation OVERLORD High-Level Command Structure. .......................................... 35 Figure 2: LCVP Ferrying Members of the American 1st Division at Normandy. ....................... 38 Figure 3: The OVERLORD Plan. ................................................................................................. 42 Figure 4: Typical United States Army Unit Hierarchy. ................................................................ 43 Figure 5: Composition of American Assault Units....................................................................... 44 Figure 6: 3-Inch Field Gun, Model 1902. ..................................................................................... 58 Figure 7: A 29th Infantry Division 105-mm Howitzer Battery. ................................................... 60 Figure 8: DUKW Landing on Normandy Beach. ......................................................................... 66 Figure 9: The Normandy Landing Beaches. ................................................................................. 69 Figure 10: Contemporary Map Showing the Landing Area of the 110th FABN and the 115th Infantry Regiment. ........................................................................................................................ 71 Figure 11: Map of Cotentin Peninsula Showing UTAH Beach Location. ................................... 87 Figure 12: The Drive Westward. .................................................................................................. 95 Figure 13: The Attack on Cherbourg. ......................................................................................... 100 viii List of Abbreviations AFHQ ............................. Allied Force Headquarters in Algiers. BN .................................. Battalion CCOS ............................. Combined Chiefs of Staff, United States, Great Britain COPPS ........................... Combined Operations and Pilotage and Beach Reconnaissance Party COSSAC ........................ Chief of Staff to the Supreme Allied Commander DUWK ........................... Designed 1942, Utility, K, All Wheel Drive, W, Dual tandem rear axel ETOUSA ........................ European Theater of Operations, United States Army FA .................................. Field Artillery FABN ............................. Field Artillery Battalion FUSAG .......................... First United States Army Group FDC ................................ Fire Direction Center INF ................................. Infantry JCOS .............................. Joint Chiefs of Staff, United States LCVP ............................. Landing Craft, Vehicle, Personnel, or Higgins Boat LST ................................ Landing Ship, Tank RAF ............................... Royal Air Force, Great Britain SHAEF ........................... Supreme Headquarters, Allied Expeditionary Force ix Glossary Allied Force Headquarters in Headquarters for Allied operations in Africa from 1943 Algiers onward. Commanded by General Dwight D Eisenhower. Allied Powers (Allies) The combined governments and military powers fighting
Recommended publications
  • Carte De Visite APPEVILLE - 50500
    MARAIS DU COTENTIN ET DU BESSIN PARC NATUREL RÉGIONAL AIGNERVILLE - 14710 ........................ F4 BOUTTEVILLE - 50480 ...................... D3 CROSVILLE-SUR-DOUVE - 50360 ....... B3 HAM (Le) - 50310 .............................. C2 MEAUFFE (La) - 50880 ..................... D5 ORGLANDES - 50390 ....................... B2 ST-GEORGES-DE-BOHON - 50500 ..... C4 STE-MARIE-DU-MONT - 50480 .......... D3 AIREL - 50680 .................................. E4 BREVANDS - 50500 ........................... D3 DEZERT (Le) - 50620 ......................... D5 HAYE-DU-PUITS (La) - 50250 ............. B4 MEAUTIS - 50500 ............................ C4 OSMANVILLE - 14230 ....................... E3 ST-GERMAIN-DE-VARREVILLE - 50480 ....D2 STE-MERE-EGLISE - 50480 .............. C2 Tourist map AMFREVILLE - 50480 ....................... C2 BRICQUEVILLE - 14710 .......................E4 DOVILLE - 50250 ............................... B3 HEMEVEZ - 50700 ............................ B2 MESNIL-EURY (Le) - 50570 ............... D5 PERIERS - 50190 .............................. B5 ST-GERMAIN-DU-PERT - 14230 ......... E3 SAINTENY - 50500 .......................... C4 AMIGNY - 50620 .............................. D5 BRUCHEVILLE - 50480 ..................... D3 ECAUSSEVILLE - 50310 .................... C2 HIESVILLE - 50480 ........................... D3 MESNIL-VENERON (Le) - 50620 ......... D4 PICAUVILLE - 50360 ......................... C3 ST-GERMAIN-SUR-AY - 50430 ........... A4 SAON - 14330 .................................. F4 ANGOVILLE-AU-PLAIN - 50480 .........
    [Show full text]
  • Cartes Du Bassin
    Normandie – Les cartes par bassin d’emploi Bassin d’emploi du Nord-Cotentin Pôle emploi Normandie – Service Statistiques, Études et Évaluation Bassin d’emploi du Nord-Cotentin: les communes (Population) 4 000 habitants ou plus Cherbourg Centre Entre 3 000 et 3 999 hab. Entre 2 000 et 2 999 hab. Entre 1 000 et 1 999 hab. Moins de 1 000 hab. Insee – RP 2015 Périmètre des agences Pôle emploi Normandie – Service Statistiques, Études et Évaluation Bassin d’emploi du Nord-Cotentin : les communes (Demandeurs d’Emploi en Fin de Mois) 1 000 DEFM ou plus Entre 500 et 999 DEFM Entre 250 et 499 DEFM Entre 100 et 249 DEFM Moins de 100 DEFM Pôle emploi STMT – DEFM ABC moyenne 2017 Pôle emploi Normandie – Service Statistiques, Études et Évaluation Agence de Cherbourg Centre : les communes Population (Insee- Nom de la commune RP 2015) La Hague* 11 824 Brillevast 332 Canteloup 222 Carneville 238 Clitourps 199 Vicq-sur-Mer* 1 020 Couville 1 107 Fermanville 1 317 Gatteville-le-Phare 489 Gonneville-le-Theil* 1 574 Hardinvast 877 Martinvast 1 248 Maupertus-sur-Mer 221 Nouainville 552 Saint-Martin-le-Gréard 491 Saint-Pierre-Église 1 795 Sideville 662 Teurthéville-Hague 1 027 Théville 311 Tocqueville 282 Tollevast 1 447 Varouville 268 Le Vast 316 Virandeville 796 Cherbourg-en-Cotentin** 80 616 *Commune issue d'une fusion ** partiellement dans le périmètre de l'agence Pôle emploi Normandie – Service Statistiques, Études et Évaluation Agence de Cherbourg Lanoé : les communes Population (Insee- Population (Insee- Nom de la commune Nom de la commune RP 2015) RP
    [Show full text]
  • Collège Du Val D'aure Rue Des Ecoles B.P. 101 14230 ISIGNY-SUR-MER
    Collège du Val d’Aure Rue des Ecoles B.P. 101 14230 ISIGNY-SUR-MER : 02.31.22.00.34 PROCES VERBAL DU CONSEIL D’ADMINISTRATION Date de la séance. 7 novembre 2019 Séance X ordinaire extraordinaire Heure de séance 17 h 35 Date d’envoi des convocations 18/10/2019 Séance précédée d’une réunion de la commission permanente en date du….. / Le procès-verbal de la séance précédente en date du 5 septembre 2019 est soumis au vote des membres présents et est approuvé ( 17 pour, 0 contre 2 abstentions) est modifié (dans ce cas, inscrire les modifications demandées) ORDRE DU JOUR Approbation du C.A. du 05/09/2019 Domaine pédagogique : DHG - IMP Projet théâtre avec la Comédie de Caen Domaine financier : Voyages et Sorties pédagogiques Tarifs 2020 Domaine de fonctionnement : Rapport annuel de fonctionnement pédagogique Rupture de la convention du CESC Isigny –Omaha En préambule, Mme Hurault soumet aux membres du conseil d’administration une modification de l’ordre du jour en raison de la tenue ce jour du bilan du contrat d’objectifs réalisé avec une partie de l’équipe pédagogique et de l’équipe de direction à la direction académique. Le rapport annuel de fonctionnement pédagogique est reporté au prochain conseil d’administration dans ce contexte. Présents : 20 Votants : 19 Pour : Abstentions : Contre : NOMS SIGNATURE Nbre Président : Total de membres du CA 20 Mme HURAULT Quorum 19 Secrétaire : Membres présents avec voix 0 délibérative Mme ROUSSEAU Membres invités en qualité 1 d’experts Collège du Val d’Aure Annexe 2 14230 ISIGNY-SUR-MER SEANCE DU CONSEIL D’ADMINISTRATION en date du 7 novembre 2019 LISTE DES PARTICIPANTS Membres de droit NOM QUALITE Présent Absent Excusé Mme HURAULT Véronique Principale X Mme ROUSSEAU Aude Principale-Adjointe X Mme DELAIN Ingrid Gestionnaire X Représentants des collectivités territoriales NOM QUALITE Titulaire Suppléant Présent Absent Excusé Mme GADY-DUQUESNE Patricia Conseiller Dép X X M.
    [Show full text]
  • Part II Session 3 “Technology to Seize an Enemy-Held Shore”
    Part II Session 3 “Technology to Seize an Enemy-held Shore” 1 Opposed Allied Amphibious Operations Prior to Normandy-Many Painful Lessons • UK-Norway, April 1940 • UK-Dakar, September 1940 • UK-Madagascar, May 1942 • UK/Canadian-Dieppe raid on the French coast, August 1942 • US/UK-Torch-Casablanca, Oran and Algiers, Nov 1942 • US/UK- Sicily/Italy – Sicily (Husky), Salerno (Avalanche), Anzio (Shingle), July –September 1943 2 “How to seize an enemy-held shore” • Examine from that past, then plan, plan, review the plan and exercise what you can of the plan. • Make sure that some one was in-charge of each action and was drilled in what to do. • What are the Germans doing and what would be a German response? Plan for that response. • Special training, new weapons, what do you need to clear the beach, how do you protect the landing forces, where is the unified command and control? 3 “How to seize an enemy-held shore” • While some of this sessions applies in the Pacific, the context here is a build up for the Normandy invasion: - One million troops and a 100,000 vehicles and everything needed to kept functioning. - The Normandy invasion was on the shore of a continent. • The Pacific War was a series of island invasions or jungle enclaves in New Guinea. No opposing armor, limited air cover or the probably of massed reserves. • Only the Philippine invasion and the possible invasion of the Japanese home Islands in November 1945 had the scope of Normandy. 4 What a Successful Amphibious Landing Requires-1 • Off-shore Command ships containing cooperative inter- service and inter-Allied staffs functioning below the Senior Chiefs level.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Airborne Divisions, and Their Role on June 6, 1944
    The Histories Volume 6 | Issue 1 Article 3 The nitU ed States Airborne Divisions, and Their Role on June 6, 1944 Dennis Carey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/the_histories Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Carey, Dennis () "The nitU ed States Airborne Divisions, and Their Role on June 6, 1944," The Histories: Vol. 6 : Iss. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/the_histories/vol6/iss1/3 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Scholarship at La Salle University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The iH stories by an authorized editor of La Salle University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Histories, Volume 6, Number 1 2 I The United States Airborne Divisions, and Their Role on June 6,1944 By Dennis Carey ‘07 The United States Airborne Divisions that were dropped behind Utah Beach in the early morning hours of June 6,1944 played a critical role in the eventual success of Operation Overlord. On the evening of June 5th, General Eisenhower visited the men of the 101st Airborne division as they geared up in preparation for their jump. In making his rounds among the troops giving his words of encouragement, a paratrooper remarked “Hell, we ain’t worried General. It’s the Krauts that ought to be worrying now.”1 This is just one example of the confidence and fortitude that the men of both the 82nd and 101st Airborne divisions possessed on the eve of Operation Overlord.
    [Show full text]
  • Fortifications V1.0.Pdf
    “Global Command Series” Fortifications v1.0 A Global War 2nd Edition 3d Printed Expansion © Historical Board Gaming Overview This set features rules for many different types of fortifications, sold separately in 3D printed sets. These rules are written Global War - 2nd edition, however at the end of this document are a few changes necessary to play these with Global War 1st edition or Axis and Allies 1940. Set Contents Name Rules Sold Separately Atlantic Wall (German) Battery Fjell (German) Flak Tower-Small (German) Flak Tower-Large (German) Panther Turret (German) Maginot Line Turret (French) Maginot Line Gun (French) Anti-Tank Casemate (Generic) Machine Gun Pillbox (Generic) Fortifications General Rules 1. You may never have more than one of the same type of fortification in the same land zone. 2. Fortifications are removed from play if the land zone they are in is captured. 1.0 Battery Fjell – Unique coastal gun 1.0 Overview: Battery Fjell was a World War II Coastal Artillery battery installed by the Germans in occupied Norway. The 283mm (11”) guns for the battery came from the damaged battleship Gneisenau. The guns were then installed in the mountains above the island of Sotra to protect the entrance to Bergen. These modern and accurate guns had a range of 24 miles and were protected by several anti-aircraft batteries supported by air search radar. Extensive ground fortifications protected the battery as well. The battery had a crew of 250 men. The Battery Fjell unit featured in this set represents the battery itself but also a number of other defensive fortifications, garrison units and light weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quandary of Allied Logistics from D-Day to the Rhine
    THE QUANDARY OF ALLIED LOGISTICS FROM D-DAY TO THE RHINE By Parker Andrew Roberson November, 2018 Director: Dr. Wade G. Dudley Program in American History, Department of History This thesis analyzes the Allied campaign in Europe from the D-Day landings to the crossing of the Rhine to argue that, had American and British forces given the port of Antwerp priority over Operation Market Garden, the war may have ended sooner. This study analyzes the logistical system and the strategic decisions of the Allied forces in order to explore the possibility of a shortened European campaign. Three overall ideas are covered: logistics and the broad-front strategy, the importance of ports to military campaigns, and the consequences of the decisions of the Allied commanders at Antwerp. The analysis of these points will enforce the theory that, had Antwerp been given priority, the war in Europe may have ended sooner. THE QUANDARY OF ALLIED LOGISTICS FROM D-DAY TO THE RHINE A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Department of History East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in History By Parker Andrew Roberson November, 2018 © Parker Roberson, 2018 THE QUANDARY OF ALLIED LOGISTICS FROM D-DAY TO THE RHINE By Parker Andrew Roberson APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR OF THESIS: Dr. Wade G. Dudley, Ph.D. COMMITTEE MEMBER: Dr. Gerald J. Prokopowicz, Ph.D. COMMITTEE MEMBER: Dr. Michael T. Bennett, Ph.D. CHAIR OF THE DEP ARTMENT OF HISTORY: Dr. Christopher Oakley, Ph.D. DEAN OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL: Dr. Paul J.
    [Show full text]
  • “La Vallée De L'aure Inférieure”
    Le Parc Naturel Régional Règlement Fédération Française de Cyclotourisme des Marais du Cotentin et du Bessin Au fil de l'Aure Inférieure Contrôle Comité Depuis la source près de Caumont-L'Eventé, l'Aure Tampon humide apposé sur la carte de pointage départemental passe à Bayeux mais disparaît près de Maisons, plonge nominative, ou contrôle possible par photo avec le vélo sous la falaise et connaît une résurgence à Port-en-Bessin apparaissant devant le panneau de la localité. de la Manche mais une petite partie continue son parcours (appelé Aure Points de contrôle : Inférieure) et se jette dans la Vire, 3 kms avant Isigny-sur- Randonnée Permanente Mer. Sur 30 000 ha de zones humides du Parc naturel • ISIGNY : Départ et Arrivée Label national n° 316/16 régional des Marais du Cotentin et du Bessin, le marais de • TREVIERES l’Aure représente une superficie de 2 500 ha et s’étend sur • PORT-EN-BESSIN (92 km seulement) “la vallée de 14 km entre Trévières et Isigny-sur-Mer. Alimenté en eau par l'Aure inférieure et ses affluents, ce marais est Droits de participation : (révisable annuellement) composé en majorité de prairies fauchées et pâturées Licencié FFCT : 5 € -18 ans : Gratuit l'Aure inférieure” appréciées des oiseaux migrateurs. Sa richesse écologique Non Licencié : 7 € -18 ans : 2 € 92 km / 52 km et économique est liée au maintien de ces pratiques Prévoir carte IGN TOP 100 n°106 agricoles et à une gestion raisonnée des niveaux d'eau. Parmi les six portes-à-flot du Parc des Marais, celles Parcours : Randonnée dans le Parc Naturel Régional du pont d'Isigny-sur-Mer ont été construites à l'exutoire de Cette randonnée est essentiellement touristique, l'Aure au début du 18è s., empêchant les remontées aucun délai n’est imposé pour effectuer cette des Marais du Cotentin et du Bessin marines qui se faisaient ressentir jusqu'à Trévières ! Outil randonnée.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Assessment of Amphibious Operations from 1941 to the Present
    CRM D0006297.A2/ Final July 2002 Charting the Pathway to OMFTS: A Historical Assessment of Amphibious Operations From 1941 to the Present Carter A. Malkasian 4825 Mark Center Drive • Alexandria, Virginia 22311-1850 Approved for distribution: July 2002 c.. Expedit'onaryyystems & Support Team Integrated Systems and Operations Division This document represents the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the Department of the Navy. Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. Specific authority: N0014-00-D-0700. For copies of this document call: CNA Document Control and Distribution Section at 703-824-2123. Copyright 0 2002 The CNA Corporation Contents Summary . 1 Introduction . 5 Methodology . 6 The U.S. Marine Corps’ new concept for forcible entry . 9 What is the purpose of amphibious warfare? . 15 Amphibious warfare and the strategic level of war . 15 Amphibious warfare and the operational level of war . 17 Historical changes in amphibious warfare . 19 Amphibious warfare in World War II . 19 The strategic environment . 19 Operational doctrine development and refinement . 21 World War II assault and area denial tactics. 26 Amphibious warfare during the Cold War . 28 Changes to the strategic context . 29 New operational approaches to amphibious warfare . 33 Cold war assault and area denial tactics . 35 Amphibious warfare, 1983–2002 . 42 Changes in the strategic, operational, and tactical context of warfare. 42 Post-cold war amphibious tactics . 44 Conclusion . 46 Key factors in the success of OMFTS. 49 Operational pause . 49 The causes of operational pause . 49 i Overcoming enemy resistance and the supply buildup.
    [Show full text]
  • ELECTIONS MUNICIPALES 1Er Tour Du 15 Mars 2020
    ELECTIONS MUNICIPALES 1er tour du 15 Mars 2020 Livre des candidats par commune (scrutin plurinominal) (limité aux communes du portefeuille : Arrondissement de Cherbourg) Page 1 Elections Municipales 1er tour du 15 Mars 2020 Candidats au scrutin plurinominal majoritaire Commune : Anneville-en-Saire (Manche) Nombre de sièges à pourvoir : 11 Mme BIGARRE Marie-Joséphe M. DEFRES Jérémie M. LA ROUTE Guillaume Mme LECLERC Laure Mme LECONTE Nathalie Mme LEGRAND Céline M. LEROY Guillaume M. LETERRIER Pascal M. PARENT Gérard Mme ROULLAND Natacha Page 2 Elections Municipales 1er tour du 15 Mars 2020 Candidats au scrutin plurinominal majoritaire Commune : Audouville-la-Hubert (Manche) Nombre de sièges à pourvoir : 7 M. BEUGIN Paul Mme CELLERIER Jeanine M. DESAUNETTE Jean-Eudes Mme LEGARDIEN Virginie Mme LUCAS Sylvie M. MARIE Emile M. MESNIL Dominique M. VALOGNE Eric Page 3 Elections Municipales 1er tour du 15 Mars 2020 Candidats au scrutin plurinominal majoritaire Commune : Aumeville-Lestre (Manche) Nombre de sièges à pourvoir : 11 M. ARDLEY William Mme DE MEYER Manuela M. GOSSELIN Bernard Mme HÉBERT Estelle M. LADUNE Bruno M. LELERRE Guillaume M. LERIDEZ Jean-Marie Mme SCELLES Marie-Françoise M. THOMASSE Gilles Page 4 Elections Municipales 1er tour du 15 Mars 2020 Candidats au scrutin plurinominal majoritaire Commune : Azeville (Manche) Nombre de sièges à pourvoir : 7 M. BELAY Alain M. BERNARD Emmanuel Mme BINET Elise Mme DAVOURIE Sylvie M. DUARTE Benoit M. FÉRON Jean-Jacques Mme HAMEL Marie M. LARCHEVESQUE William Mme LAURENT Katia Mme LE GAL Valérie M. LESELLIER David M. LESVENTES Marc M. LETOURNEUR Patrick Mme MESMEUR Marie-Claire Mme MIGNOT Michelle M.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Infantry Combat Training During the Second World War
    SHARPENING THE SABRE: CANADIAN INFANTRY COMBAT TRAINING DURING THE SECOND WORLD WAR By R. DANIEL PELLERIN BBA (Honours), Wilfrid Laurier University, 2007 BA (Honours), Wilfrid Laurier University, 2008 MA, University of Waterloo, 2009 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in History University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ontario, Canada © Raymond Daniel Ryan Pellerin, Ottawa, Canada, 2016 ii ABSTRACT “Sharpening the Sabre: Canadian Infantry Combat Training during the Second World War” Author: R. Daniel Pellerin Supervisor: Serge Marc Durflinger 2016 During the Second World War, training was the Canadian Army’s longest sustained activity. Aside from isolated engagements at Hong Kong and Dieppe, the Canadians did not fight in a protracted campaign until the invasion of Sicily in July 1943. The years that Canadian infantry units spent training in the United Kingdom were formative in the history of the Canadian Army. Despite what much of the historical literature has suggested, training succeeded in making the Canadian infantry capable of succeeding in battle against German forces. Canadian infantry training showed a definite progression towards professionalism and away from a pervasive prewar mentality that the infantry was a largely unskilled arm and that training infantrymen did not require special expertise. From 1939 to 1941, Canadian infantry training suffered from problems ranging from equipment shortages to poor senior leadership. In late 1941, the Canadians were introduced to a new method of training called “battle drill,” which broke tactical manoeuvres into simple movements, encouraged initiative among junior leaders, and greatly boosted the men’s morale.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Fortifications on the Coast of the Pacific Ocean
    Scientific Journal of Latvia University of Agriculture Landscape Architecture and Art, Volume 10, Number 10 The European fortifications on the coast of the Pacific Ocean Nikolay Kasyanov, Research Institute of Theory and History of Architecture and Urban Planning of the Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences, Moscow, Russia Abstract. In the Russian Empire during XIX and early XX centuries, fortresses were built and strengthened along the frontiers. We studied the architecture of the Far Eastern Russian cities-fortresses using as examples Nikolaevsk-on-Amur, Port Arthur (now Luishun) and mainly Vladivostok. Coastal fortresses significantly influenced the urban development of the Far Eastern cities. The architectural peculiarity of the fortress architecture at that period was associated with the transition from the brick and stone fortifications to the complex systems of monolithic reinforced concrete. In 1860, a military post with the expressive and geopolitically ambitious name "Vladivostok" ("Possess the East") was established. By the beginning of the XX century, Vladivostok became a rapidly growing city of the European culture and one of the most powerful marine fortresses in the world. The Vladivostok Fortress was an innovative project in early XX century and has distinctive features of the modern style (Art Nouveau), partly of the Russian and classical style in architecture, as well as an organic unity with the surrounding landscape. Plastic architectural masses with their non-linear shape are typical of the fortifications of Vladivostok. Vast and branching internal communication spaces link fort buildings, scattered on the surface and remote from each other. Huge, monumental forts located on the tops of mountains and fitted perfectly in the landscape are successful examples of landscape architecture.
    [Show full text]