Runway-Area Topographic Considerations in Airport Licensing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Runway-Area Topographic Considerations in Airport Licensing Runway-Area Topographic Considerations In Airport Licensing By Mr. Brian Hatcher, Mr. Todd Sullivan, Mr. Jeff Tedder, Mr. Jon Williams, and Dr. Charles D. Haynes Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering The University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, Alabama Prepared by UTCA University Transportation Center for Alabama The University of Alabama, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, and The University of Alabama in Huntsville UTCA Report Number 03108 December 31, 2003 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient Catalog No. FHWA/CA/OR- 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Runway-area Topographic Considerations In Airport December 31, 2003 Licensing 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Authors 8. Performing Organization Report No. Mr. Brian Hatcher, Mr. Todd Sullivan, Mr. Jeff Tedder, and Dr. Charles Haynes UTCA Final Report 03108 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. The University of Alabama Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering P.O Box 870205 11. Contract or Grant No. Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0205 DTSR002324 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered University Transportation Center for Alabama Final Report: January 1 – December 31, 2003 The University of Alabama Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 14. Sponsoring Agency Code P.O Box 870205 Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0205 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract Alabama’s general use airports were studied by traditional surveying and global positioning satellite techniques to determine if natural or manmade topographic hazards existed in their runway protection zones (RPZ). The severity of obstructions in the RPZ was rated on a scale of 1-5, with the severity increasing with number. Many of the airports surveyed have significant obstructions in their RPZ and are a hazard to approaching and departing aircraft. The results of this study point to the use of a RPZ obstruction rating as part of the Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) airport design algorithm. The data generated during this project was compiled as a Technical Appendix, published in two companion reports for this project (UTCA Reports 03108-A and 03108-B). Photographs were taken of runway-end conditions during the project; these were provided to the ALDOT Aviation Bureau. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Runway, approach, departure, airport design, topography, Protection zones 19. Security Class 20. Security Class 21. No of 22. Price (of this report) (of this page) Pages N/A N/A ii Contents Topic Page Contents …………………………………………………………………………… iii List of Tables ……………………………………………………………………… iv List of Figures …………………………………………………………………... v Executive Summary ……………………………………………………………….. vi 1.0 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………. 1 1.1 Study Purpose ……………………………………………………………... 1 1.2 Project Approach ………………………………………………………….. 2 2.0 General Aviation Overview 2.1 General Aviation Airports and Their Community …………………………. 3 2.2 Safety Impacts ……………………………………………………………… 3 3.0 Methodology ……………………………………………………………………. 5 3.1 Aerial Photographs and Topographic Pictures …………………………. …. 5 3.2 Field Surveying ……………………………………………………….......... 5 3.2.1 Stadia Survey ………………………………………………………… 5 3.2.2 GPS Verified Survey ………………………………………………… 6 3.2.3 Sight Verified Survey ………………………………………..... ……. 6 4.0 Project Results …………………………………………………………………. 7 5.0 Project Conclusions and Recommendations …………………………………… 13 6.0 References ……………………………………………………………………... 14 7.0 Technical Appendix Appendix 1: Airport Diagrams and Surveys ...…………………………….. 15 Appendix 2: Runway Protection Zone Obstruction Photographs ………..... 15 iii List of Tables 2-1 Obstructions Struck in Overrun Accidents……………………………………. 4 4-1 Airport Rankings………………………………………………………………. 8 List of Figures 2.1 Location of Runway Environment Accidents………………………………… 4 3.1 Safe Runway-End Topography, Marion County (Hamilton) Runway 18….... 7 3.2 Unsafe Runway-End Topography, George Downer (Aliceville) Runway 24… 7 4.1 Runway Topographic Data Form……………………………………………… 12 iv Executive Summary A study was performed to assess and rank the runway-area topography of Alabama’s general use airports. Traditional surveying and global positioning satellite techniques were used to identify topographic features that pose hazards to arriving and departing aircraft. Such hazards included, but were not restricted to: ditches, uneven terrain, adverse slopes, standing water, tree stumps, and manmade obstructions. The obstructions described above were ranked on a scale of 1-5, with larger numbers corresponding to more severe situations. Many airports were deemed to have sufficient obstructions to pose hazards to aircraft that might undershoot or overshoot the runway. Because of the number of topographic obstructions found in this study, it is recommended that runway-area topography be considered in the licensing algorithm for Alabama’s general use airports. The inspection data generated during this project was compiled as a Technical Appendix, which was published in two companion reports for this project (UTCA Reports 03108-A and 03108-B). Photographs taken of runway-end conditions were provided to the ALDOT Aviation Bureau. v Section 1 1.0 Introduction Over the last century, aviation has been a catalyst for economic growth and has enriched the quality of life for all Americans. It has connected every sector of business and every region of the world with its speed and convenience. As aviation grows, safety becomes the primary concern of communities and persons utilizing aviation facilities and opportunities. These concerns have caused the formation of agencies at state and federal levels focusing on safety, capacity, and efficiency. Civil aviation includes all commercial airline operations and general aviation (GA). GA, the focus of this project, includes all flights which are not scheduled or chartered. GA supports over 1.3 million high-skill, high-wage jobs comprising over one percent of the U.S. gross domestic product. The number of people using small aircraft for personal, business, and recreational purposes in the United States has increased to over 145 million passengers a year causing a corresponding increase in the demand for adequate GA airports. GA passengers currently have access to over 5,400 public use (or general use) airports located all over America. These public use airports are the responsibility of state governments that determine and apply safety criteria to ensure that airports in their responsible care operate according to these criteria (www.gaservingamerica. 2003). 1.1 Study Purpose The majority of aircraft accidents occur in the runway environment through loss of directional control because of mechanical failure, reverse thrust failure or misapplication, braking systems malfunction, and pilot error. When this happens, it sometimes results in excursions off the paved runway surface onto the runway end areas or locations adjacent to the runway. Obstructions such as large rocks, stumps, earth mounds, depressions, and manmade obstacles can turn what the FAA refers to as an “incident” into a full-blown accident. Federal guidelines for airport design specify certain grade limits at the end of runway centerlines as well as perpendicular to the centerline. These runway–end areas are termed runway protection zones (RPZ). State guidelines for new general use airport licensing follow federal guidelines (Horonjeff, et al. 1994), but older airports were often not designed for, or brought up to, these standards. Under current Alabama airport licensing conditions, inspection emphasis is given to obstacle clearance for runway approaches but not necessarily to the runway-end environment. This allows airports with unsafe terrain in the runway protection zones to obtain licensing while operating with unsafe conditions. Beginning January 1, 2005, Alabama inspection criteria will require that the land area beneath the approach and departure path for all publicly owned 1 runways, nominally 1,000 feet from the runway ends, be owned and/or managed by the airport owner. Currently, this control is encouraged but not enforced. This project inspected 82 Alabama GA airports to determine if unsafe topographic features existed in the runway environment. This generally included all property within 1,000 feet of a runway threshold. The primary objectives for this project were to: 1. Alert pilots of potentially unsafe runway-area obstructions conditions that may not be current in federal guides or consumer-oriented web sites such as AirNav.Com (AirNav.Com. 2003). 2. Rank the severity of these obstructions using a simple scale. 3. Determine if topographic features in the runway environment should be included in general use airport licensing criteria. 1.2 Project Approach The following work tasks were used to accomplish the project objectives: 1. Inventory runway-area topographies for 82 general use airports in Alabama. This hands-on phase created a runway topography survey data sheet for these airports. All hazardous topographical features in the runway-end environment were included in the database. 2. Incorporate topographic data into the Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) Aviation Bureau licensing database. 3. Depending on the severity of the obstructions found in the runway-end environment, determine if these data should be included in the revised weighted airport-licensing procedures for Alabama’s general use airports. 2 Section 2 2.0 General Aviation Overview Public and private airports that
Recommended publications
  • February 1, 2018 Notices to Airmen
    U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration NOTICES TO AIRMEN Domestic/International February 1, 2018 Next Issue March 1, 2018 Notices to Airmen included in this publication are NOT given during pilot briefings unless specifically requested by the pilot. An electronic version of this publication is on the internet at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/notices Air Traffic Products and Publications Team JANUARY − 2018 FEBRUARY − 2018 MARCH − 2018 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT ËË ËËË 1 2 3ËËË4 5 6 1 2 3 1 2 3 ËËË ËË ËËË 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ËËË ËËË APRIL − 2018 MAY − 2018 JUNE − 2018 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 ÊÊÊÊÊ ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊ 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 6 7 8 9 10 11 12ÊÊÊ3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ÊÊÊÊÊ ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊ 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 14 15 16 17 18 19ÊÊÊ10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ËË ËËË 22 23 24 25ËËË26 27 28 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ËËË ËË ËËË 29 30 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ËËË JULY − 2018 AUGUST − 2018 SEPTEMBER − 2018 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 1 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ËËË ËË ËËË ËËË ËË ËËË 22 23 24 25ËËË26 27
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Airport Licensing: a Summary Report for The
    Revised Airport Licensing A Summary Report for the Aeronautics Bureau of The Alabama Department of Transportation By Mr. Renju Abraham, Mr. Jonathan Williams and Dr. Charles D. Haynes Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering The University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, Alabama Prepare d by UTCA University Transportation Center for Alabama The University of Alabama, The University of Alabama in Birmingham, and The University of Alabama at Huntsville UTCA Report Number 02410 June 30, 2003 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date June 2003 Revised Airport Licensing Performing Organization Code 7. Authors 8. Performing Organization Report No. Mr. Renju Abraham, Mr. Jonathan Williams and Dr. UTCA Report 02410 Charles D. Haynes, 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. University Transportation Center for Alabama P O Box 870205 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Alabama Alabama Department of Transportation Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0205 Research Project 930-518 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Alabama Department of Transportation Final Report: January 2002 – September 2003 1409 Coliseum Boulevard 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Montgomery, AL 36130 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract A series of three projects developed a new annual inspection system for the Aeronautics Bureau of the Alabama Department of Transportation, for use on Alabama’s general aviation (GA) airports. An inspection rating algorithm was developed, a web site was designed, and a new inspection database was created and hosted online. The airport inspector can report the inspection results and post them within a matter of hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Division I—Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2009
    [House Appropriations Committee Print] Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (H.R. 1105; Public Law 111–8) DIVISION I—TRANSPORTATION, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2009 (1941) VerDate Nov 24 2008 04:55 Mar 27, 2009 Jkt 047494 PO 00000 Frm 00677 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A494P2.XXX A494P2 rfrederick on PROD1PC65 with HEARING VerDate Nov 24 2008 04:55 Mar 27, 2009 Jkt 047494 PO 00000 Frm 00678 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A494P2.XXX A494P2 rfrederick on PROD1PC65 with HEARING CONTENTS, DIVISION I Page Legislative Text: Title I—Department of Transportation .......................................................... 1947 Title II—Department of Housing and Urban Development .......................... 1982 Title III—Related Agencies .............................................................................. 2015 Title IV—General Provisions—This Act ......................................................... 2019 Explanatory Statement: Title I—Department of Transportation .......................................................... 2023 Title II—Department of Housing and Urban Development .......................... 2115 Title III—Related Agencies .............................................................................. 2156 Title IV—General Provisions—This Act ......................................................... 2158 (1943) VerDate Nov 24 2008 06:05 Mar 27, 2009 Jkt 047494 PO 00000 Frm 00679 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 0483 E:\HR\OC\A494P2.XXX A494P2 rfrederick on PROD1PC65 with HEARING VerDate Nov 24 2008 06:05 Mar 27, 2009 Jkt 047494 PO 00000 Frm 00680 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 0483 E:\HR\OC\A494P2.XXX A494P2 rfrederick on PROD1PC65 with HEARING [CLERK’S NOTE: Five sections which precede division I in the Omnibus Appropriations Act apply to all divisions of the Act, in- cluding this one. The text of these sections is as follows:] SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009’’.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Capacity and TSAM
    A Modeling Framework to Estimate Airport Runway Capacity in the National Airspace System Yueh-Ting Chen Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In Civil and Environmental Engineering Committee Members: Dr. Antonio Trani Dr. Hojong Baik Dr. Hesham Rakha December 12, 2006 Blacksburg, VA Keywords: airport runway capacity, Airfield Capacity Model Copyright 2006, Yueh-Ting Chen A Modeling Framework to Estimate Airport Runway Capacity in the National Airspace System Yueh-Ting Chen Abstract The objective of this study is to estimate the airport capacity in the National Airspace System (NAS). Previous studies have focused on the airport capacity of large commercial airports. This research study estimates the runway capacity for more than two thousand airports in the NAS in order to understand future tradeoffs between air transportation demand and supply. The study presented in this report includes capacity estimates for general aviation and commercial airports. To estimate airport runway capacity, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airfield Capacity Model (ACM) is used to assess the capacity at all candidate airports in a target airport set. This set includes all airports with potential Very Light Jet (VLJ) operations. The result of the study provides a broad view about the airport capacity in the future air transportation system, and could help decision makers with a modeling framework to identify congestion patterns in the system. Moreover, airport capacity is an important limiting factor in the growth of air transportation demand. The main motivation in our analyis is to include airport capacity constraints in forecasts of air transportation demand.
    [Show full text]
  • AL-18 LE Directory.Pdf
    1 A Word from the Publisher Hometown Publishing, Inc. The information contained in this directory has been collected and compiled to insure maximum accuracy. Our staff has attempted to contact every police and sheriff department by email, fax, and phone to obtain their most current information. In some cases, however, we were unable to make contact and have used the most current data available to us through third party sources. While we have made every effort to provide the most up-to-date information possible, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of all information. We apologize in advance for any errors/omissions that occur. Our goal is excellence in all we do. Please forward any changes/corrections/additions, etc. to us at: [email protected] to be included in the next edition of the Alabama Law Enforcement Directory. Thank you for the privilege of serving you. Your Hometown Publishing Production Team Hometown Publishing Inc. 185 Old Depot Road Monroe, LA 71203 Email: [email protected] Web: www.hometownpublishinginc.com Phone: 318-509-9113 Additional copies are available at $15 each (postage included) by contacting the publisher. 2 ALABAMA Law Enforcement Directory - 2018 - Courtesy of Alabama Association of Chiefs of Police Association President - Chief Ted Cook (334) 207-2712 www.aacop.com Produced and Published by Hometown Publishing, Inc. Monroe, LA - (318) 509-9113 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS POLICE DEPARTMENTS.............................................................7 POLICE CHIEFS INDEX..............................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Adobe PDF Format
    2008 FEDERAL EXCISE TAX - RURAL AIRPORTS This information has been prepared for the IRS by the DOT, Office of Airline Information. This list was prepared based on 2006 enplanement statistics and can be used for 2008. Airport distances are calculated from a start and end latitude and longitude based on a constant compass course for a rhumb line between the points (loxodrome) using an Albers Equal Area Projection. Airport coordinates are based on FAA and National Imagery and Mapping Agency data. Subsidized Essential Air Service communities are eligible for tax relief regardless of its proximity to to other airports. If an airport does not appear on the list and an airport administrator has information that may render an airport eligible, this information should be submitted, in writing, to the Office of Airline Information, RITA, RTS 42, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E., Washington, DC 20590, telephone 202-366-4 Please provide a telephone contact, should questions arise concerning the information submitted. U.S. public and private airport use is based on data provided by FAA. Codes are FAA and IATA codes. Data is sorted by country, state and then alphabetically by city name. Internet ostpxweb.dot.gov/aviation/index.html (click in "Domestic", then "Domestic Issues", then "Rural Airport Listing") FAA IATA City Airport Name State Country ADK ADK Adak Island Adak AK USA AKK AKK Akhiok Akhiok AK USA KQA KQA Akutan Akutan AK USA AUK AUK Alakanuk Alakanuk AK USA 4AK7 WKK Aleknagik Aleknagik Mission School AK USA 5A8
    [Show full text]
  • RURAL AIR 06 2012.Pdf
    2012 FEDERAL EXCISE TAX - RURAL AIRPORTS 6/14/2012 Revised This information has been prepared for the IRS by the DOT, Office of Airline Information. This list was prepared based on 2010 enplanement statistics and can be used for 2012. Airport distances are calculated from a start and end latitude and longitude based on a constant compass course for a rhumb line between the points (loxodrome) using an Albers Equal Area Projection. Airport coordinates are based on FAA and National Imagery and Mapping Agency data. Subsidized Essential Air Service communities are eligible for tax relief regardless of its proximity to other airports. If an airport does not appear on the list and an airport administrator has information that may render an airport eligible, this information should be submitted, in writing, to the Office of Airline Information, RITA, RTS 42, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E., Washington, DC 20590, telephone 202-366-5235. Please provide a telephone contact, should questions arise concerning the information submitted. U.S. public and private airport use is based on data provided by FAA. Codes are FAA and IATA codes. Data is sorted by country, state and then alphabetically by city name. Internet ostpxweb.dot.gov/aviation/index.html (click in "Domestic", then "Domestic Issues", then "Rural Airport Listing") LOCID IATA CITY AIRPORT STATE COUNTRY 19AK Icy Bay Icy Bay AK US AK81 Amook Bay Amook Bay AK US AKA Atka Atka AK US ALZ ALZ Lazy Bay Alitak AK US CDV CDV Cordova Merle K (Mudhole) Smith AK US CEM CEM
    [Show full text]