Meeting Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Meeting Report MEETING REPORT Exploring the pole: an EMBO conference on centrosomes and spindle pole bodies Sue L. Jaspersen and Tim Stearns The centrosome and spindle pole body community gathered for its triennial meeting from 12–16 September, 2008 at EMBL in Heidelberg (Germany). Sponsored by the EMBO, the conference on Centrioles are short, cylindrical structures in constituent proteins, and the identification centrosomes and spindle pole bodies was which the walls of the cylinder are made up of of those that are key functional components, organized by Trisha Davis, Susan Dutcher, nine specialized triplet microtubules. This elegant as opposed to hangers-on that use the centro- Michael Knop, Robert Palazzo, Elmar Schiebel nine-fold symmetry is absolutely conserved and some as a cellular assembly point. At the first and Kip Sluder. This was the fourth meeting gives centrioles their characteristic ‘pinwheel’ meeting twelve years ago, John Kilmartin’s in a series that started in 1996 and, as with the appearance in cross-section. Separate from their mass-spectrometry analysis of the SPB4 was previous meetings1–3, was an occasion to cel- role as a focus of PCM, centrioles also nucleate the a prescient first glimpse of the cornucopia of ebrate present accomplishments and contem- ciliary axoneme, imparting their nine-fold sym- centrosome proteins that would soon emerge plate the future. Below we summarize some of metry to this structure as well. A centriole at the from similar work on centrosomes, centrioles the major themes that emerged. base of a cilium is referred to as a basal body. and cilia. Whereas we once had the sense of The centrosome, with its pair of centrioles, having hold of only the trunk, leg or tail of the Centrosome 101 duplicates once per cell cycle at the G1/S tran- proverbial centrosomal elephant, new results Microtubules and their constellation of asso- sition so that a cell will have exactly two cen- are revealing a much more complete picture of ciated proteins and structures are strongly trosomes during mitosis. Centrioles reproduce the organelle as a whole. conserved components of all eukaryotic cells. semi-conservatively; the pairs separate and each Jens Andersen described a refinement of the One of the universal themes in the microtubule ‘mother’ centriole grows a new ‘daughter’ cen- original mass-spectrometry analysis of mamma- cytoskeleton is the use of specific structures to triole from its side. The centrosome has a mutu- lian centrosomes5, using SILAC stable isotope organize microtubules into useful arrays. The alistic relationship with the mitotic spindle, labelling technology to increase coverage and centrosome of animal cells and the spindle pole helping to form the poles of the spindle, while specificity of results from impure centrosome body of fungi are the two best characterized at the same time using that spindle to segregate material. Jean Cohen presented a compilation microtubule-organizing structures and were equally to the sister cells of a division. This equal of centriole and cilia proteomic data from across the topic of this meeting. The centrosome segregation of one centrosome per cell ensures the eukaryotic world and an associated web- contains a pair of centrioles surrounded by that each cell has the potential to grow a cilium, based analysis tool. In these and other proteomic a matrix of proteins involved in microtubule which is imparted by the mother centriole. studies, the same proteins come up repeatedly, nucleation and other centrosome functions. Most fungi have lost the capacity to make suggesting that, by analogy to genetic screens, This matrix of proteins is usually referred to as centrioles and cilia but have evolved a morpho- we are close to saturation for identification of pericentriolar material (PCM), although many logically distinct structure, known as the spindle new components. However, lest one become of the components of PCM are also found at pole body (SPB), to serve as their primary site of sanguine about this prospect, Hannah Müller’s other sites of microtubule organization in dif- microtubule nucleation. The functional orthol- proteomic analysis of centrosomes, isolated from ferentiated cell types. ogy of the SPB to the centrosome is reflected rapidly dividing Drosophila embryos, found only in the conservation of some of the important limited overlap with the list of known centro- Sue L. Jaspersen is at the Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110 USA components, and genetic and biochemical anal- some proteins from other systems. Perhaps and in the Department of Molecular and Integrative ysis of SPBs have provided valuable insight into this reflects differences in analysis techniques Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, centrosome regulation and function. or important biological changes in centrosome Kansas City, KS 66160 USA. Tim Stearns is in the Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, components in the rapidly dividing embryo. CA 94305 USA and in the Department of Genetics, Centrosome parts Genetic analysis has also made an important Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305 USA. e-mail: [email protected] and The rate-limiting step in understanding the contribution to identifying centrosome com- [email protected] centrosome has been the definition of its ponents and their interactions. The keynote NATURE CELL BIOLOGY VOLUME 10 | NUMBER 12 | DECEMBER 2008 1375 © 2008 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. MEETING REPORT SZY-20 SPD-2 Mps1 ZYG-1/Plk4 APC SCF Cdk2-cyclinA/E SAS-6 SAS-6-P SAS-4/CPAP SAS-5 Bld10/Cep135 G1/S cartwheel formation centriole assembly S M centriole Separase centriole elongation Plk1 disengagement, cytokinesis G2 and M centriole maturation & separation Bora Aurora-A Plk1 Recruitment of PCM, appendage, γ-TuRC, hPoc5, spindle pole proteins Figure 1 Centriole duplication pathway. Schematic representation of the major steps in centrosome duplication, as well as structural and regulatory proteins. We have combined results from several systems, and the details may differ in specific systems (for reviews of the centriole cycle and its cell-cycle control, see refs 18, 29–31). At the end of mitosis, each of the two engaged centrioles within each pair become disengaged by the action of the separase protease and Plk1. The older of the centrioles in each pair is marked with distal and sub-distal appendages, and the two centrioles remain linked by cohesion fibres. Centriole duplication is initiated at the disengaged centrioles during G1/S by SPD-2, as well as the kinases Mps1 and Cdk2–cyclinA/E. A key regulatory step in centriole duplication is activation of the kinase ZYG–1/Plk4; this involves control of its kinase activity, localization to the centrosome and, ultimately, proteolysis by the SCF ubiquitylation complex. Active ZYG–1/Plk4 can phosphorylate SAS-6, a component of the cartwheel structure at the base of nascent centrioles. Recruitment of SAS-6, SAS-5 and Bld10/Cep135 drive formation of the cartwheel, which imparts a nine-fold symmetry on the forming centriole. During S phase, centriole duplication continues by recruitment of SAS-4/CPAP. Levels of CPAP are tightly controlled during the cell cycle by APC-mediated proteolysis, perhaps restricting centriole assembly. Daughter centrioles continue to elongate during G2 and early M phase after activation of Aurora A at the centrosome, which is regulated by Plk1 and Bora. The centrin-binding protein hPoc5 is also recruited to the centrosome. The new mother centriole matures by addition of components of distal and subdistal appendages. The cohesion link between the two mother centrioles is broken, allowing the centrosomes to move to opposite sides of the nucleus. As mitosis begins, γ-tubulin ring complex (γ-TuRC) and other PCM components are recruited to the centrosomes, along with mitotic spindle pole proteins. The two mitotic centrosomes nucleate microtubules and help to form the mitotic spindle on which both chromosomes and centrosomes will segregate to the two daughter cells. At the end of mitosis, separase and Plk1 trigger centriole disengagement, allowing the centrioles to duplicate in the G1/S phase, and completing the cycle. address from Tony Hyman stressed the power Similar RNAi screens have been performed Interestingly, hPoc5 contains Sfi1-like repeats, of RNA interference (RNAi) in Caenorhabditis in Drosophila melanogaster cultured cells8,9. which were originally discovered as Cdc31/cen- elegans and mammalian cells as a tool for iden- Naomi Stevens described three genes, ana1, trin-binding motifs in the Saccharomyces cerevi- tifying important components and determining ana2 and ana3, that are involved in centrosome siae SPB component Sfi1. Recruitment of hPoc5 their function. Combining the ability to observe duplication and whose duplication results in to the distal lumen of centrioles, where centrin early embryonic divisions of C. elegans with anastral spindles. Ana2 is structurally similar 2/3 are located, occurs late in G2 and involves whole-genome RNAi, Hyman and his worm- to SAS-5, and like SAS-5 is required for centri- binding to its interacting partner, hPoc19, which ophile colleagues have discovered several of ole formation. Chad Pearson used basal body is recruited earlier in the cell cycle. the key players, including SAS-4 and SAS-6. He proteome data from Tetrahymena10 to identify described recent work revealing an unexpected Poc1 as a conserved centriole component that Centrosome pathways connection between centrosome size and spindle is also required for centrosome duplication One of the deeper mysteries of centrosome length, which was independent of microtubule and ciliogenesis in human cells. Using human biology is how the initiation of new centrioles nucleation. In addition, his group combined a centrin as the bait in a yeast two-hybrid screen, is controlled. As each centriole is potentially a mammalian RNAi screen6 with tagging of pro- Michel Bornens identified hPoc5, the human distinct centrosome, controlling initiation is teins in BACs7 to identify interaction networks orthologue of a protein originally identified in the key event in centrosome number control.
Recommended publications
  • Human CPAP and CP110 in Centriole Elongation and Ciliogenesis
    Human CPAP and CP110 in Centriole Elongation and Ciliogenesis Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften der Fakultät für Biologie der Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München Vorgelegt von Thorsten I. Schmidt München, 2010 Dissertation eingereicht am: 11.05.2010 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 25.10.2010 Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Erich A. Nigg Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Angelika Böttger Hiermit erkläre ich, dass ich die vorliegende Dissertation selbständig und ohne unerlaubte Hilfe angefertigt habe. Sämtliche Experimente wurden von mir selbst durchgeführt, soweit nicht explizit auf Dritte verwiesen wird. Ich habe weder an anderer Stelle versucht, eine Dissertation oder Teile einer solchen einzureichen bzw. einer Prüfungskommission vorzulegen, noch eine Doktorprüfung zu absolvieren. München, den 11.05.2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SUMMARY............................................................................................................................1 2. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................2 2.1 Function and Structure of the Centrosome.....................................................................2 2.1.1 The Centrosome as MTOC in Proliferating Cells .................................................2 2.1.2 The Centriole as Template for Cilia and Flagella .................................................3 2.1.3 Molecular Composition and Structure of the Centrosome....................................3 2.2
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanisms of Centriole Duplication and Their Deregulation in Disease
    REVIEWS Once and only once: mechanisms of centriole duplication and their deregulation in disease Erich A. Nigg1 and Andrew J. Holland2 Abstract | Centrioles are conserved microtubule-based organelles that form the core of the centrosome and act as templates for the formation of cilia and flagella. Centrioles have important roles in most microtubule-related processes, including motility, cell division and cell signalling. To coordinate these diverse cellular processes, centriole number must be tightly controlled. In cycling cells, one new centriole is formed next to each pre-existing centriole in every cell cycle. Advances in imaging, proteomics, structural biology and genome editing have revealed new insights into centriole biogenesis, how centriole numbers are controlled and how alterations in these processes contribute to diseases such as cancer and neurodevelopmental disorders. Moreover, recent work has uncovered the existence of surveillance pathways that limit the proliferation of cells with numerical centriole aberrations. Owing to this progress, we now have a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms governing centriole biogenesis, opening up new possibilities for targeting these pathways in the context of human disease. Procentriole Centrosomes function in animal cells as microtubule Centrosome structure and assembly A newly constructed centriole organizing centres and thus have key roles in regulat­ Centriole duplication and centrosome assembly are that is unable to duplicate. ing cell shape, polarity and motility, as well as spindle complex processes that need to be tightly regulated dur­ formation, chromosome segregation and cyto kinesis1–4. ing proliferation and development. Key components A typical animal cell begins the cell cycle with a single involved in these processes have recently been identified, centrosome, comprising a pair of centrioles.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Faseb Science Research Conferences Advisory Committee Meeting
    Proposal #: 15-19 2013 FASEB SCIENCE RESEARCH CONFERENCES ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING TOPIC FOR CONSIDERATION TOPIC NAME: MITOSIS: SPINDLE ASSEMBLY AND FUNCTION PREVIOUS TITLE: Mitosis: Spindle Assembly and Function SUBMITTED BY: Erich Nigg, Biozentrum der Universitat Basel Rebecca Heald, University of California-Berkeley YEAR REQUESTED FOR 2015 SCHEDULING: SITE REQUESTS: 1. Portugal 2. Nassau, Bahamas 3. Big Sky, MT DATE REQUESTS: 1. June 21-27, 2015 2. June 28-July 3, 2015 3. September 6-12, 2015 YEAR(S) CONFERENCE 2007, 2009, 2012 HAS BEEN HELD: NOTES: Avoid mid-to-late June dates if Gordon Conferences has similar conferences at that time. FASEB SRC Proposal Instructions Attached are the instructions and requirements for submitting a FASEB SRC proposal. Please complete sections 1-6 before submitting your information. Please submit your proposal by September 23, 2013 in order to be considered for the 2015 SRC Series. Proposals will be reviewed by the FASEB Science Research Conference Advisory Committee in mid November. Shortly thereafter, you will receive a letter with the committee’s decision on your submitted proposal. By the end of January 2014 you will receive a second letter which will indicate the location and date for your conference as well as the name of your assigned Conference Manager. Once your conference is approved, your conference manager will schedule a kick-off conference call to discuss timelines, expectations, instructions on fund raising, and program management to help make your organization process successful. Section 1: Organizer Responsibilities By submitting a FASEB Science Research Conference proposal for consideration by the FASEB SRC Advisory Committee, the organizer(s) accepts the responsibility for producing a successful conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Personal Data
    Curriculum Vitae Personal Data Surname: Meraldi Given name: Patrick Gender: male Date and place of birth: Zurich, 27. 09. 1972 Nationality: Swiss Mail: [email protected] Address: Centre Medical Universitaire, PHYME, Rue Michel Servet 1, 1211 Genève 4 Web: http://www.unige.ch/medecine/phym/en/groupes/922meraldi/ Present Position From 09 / 2012: Associate Professor in the Department of Cellular Physiology and Metabolism, Medical Faculty, University of Geneva, Switzerland Education 1997 - 1999 PhD studies in Molecular Biology with Prof. Erich Nigg, Department of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, Switzerland, working on the centrosome cycle 1996 Certificat in Molecular Biology with Prof. Erich Nigg, Department of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, Switzerland 1995 Diplomawork with Prof. Joseph Brunner, Institute of Biochemistry, ETH Zurich, Switzerland 1991 – 1995 Undergraduate studies in Biology, ETH Zurich, Switzerland Past Research Experience 2005 – 2012 SNF-professor, Institute of Biochemistry, ETH Zurich, Switzerland working on human cell division 2002 – 2005 EMBO post-doctoral fellow with Prof. Peter Sorger, Department of Biology, MIT, Cambridge, USA working on the spindle checkpoint and kinetochores 1999 – 2002 SNF post-doctoral fellow with Prof. Erich Nigg, Max-Planck-Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany working on the origin of supernumerary centrosomes Awards and Fellowships 2011 Ernst Theodor Jucker prize for Cancer Research (Ernst Theodor Jucker foundation) 2011 Walther Flemming Medal (from the German
    [Show full text]
  • Nigg Brochure.Pub
    The Department of Biochemistry About the Beach Lectures Presents David W. Beach was born in 1925 in London, England. Following service in the Royal Navy, he was married to Doris Holmes and began his ca- reer as a Chartered Accountant. Feeling the urge to expand his hori- zons, he moved to CanadaTHE and DAVID began a series W. ofBEACH jobs in the aluminum The 2009 Beach Distinguished Lectures industry that included General Manager of Kawneer, Canada and Vice- President of Kawneer,MEMORIAL Inc. LECTURESHIP IN BIOCHEMISTRY As Vice-President of ALUMAX Aluminum Corporation he was instru- mental in making it one of the largest and most profitable aluminum October 26-October 27 companies in the world, prior to his retirement. Inspired by his son’s enthusiasm for science, he has chosen to share his good fortune by sup- porting this biochemistry graduate program. This long-term support is intended to promote intellectual curiosity, a commitment to excellence, and an appreciation of science in all those involved. Previous Speakers in the David Beach Lecture Series 2008 Tom Kunkel National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2007 David Allis The Rockefeller University 2006 Chris Somerville Carnegie Institution and Stanford University 2005 Mark Stitt Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology 2004 Craig Garner Stanford University 2000 Timothy J. Richmond Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Dr. Erich Nigg Zurich, Switzerland 2000 Gerald Joyce The Scripps Research Institute University of Basel, Switzerland Department of Cell Biology Department of Biochemistry 175 S. University St. West Lafayette, IN 47907 Phone: 765-494-1600 www.biochem.purdue.edu Brief Biography Cell Cycle Control: Focus on the Centrosome Cycle Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Focus on Cell Cycle and DNA Damage
    EDITORIAL Focus on Cell cycle and DNA UK Parliament comments on damage peer review How cells accurately duplicate and segregate their Recognizing the importance of sound scientific advice genetic information remains a topic of intense to the government, the UK Parliament has examined research. A series of specially commissioned articles in the peer review system. this issue presents recent insights into different aspects In July, the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee of the cell division cycle and genomic surveillance. published a comprehensive report “Peer review in scientific publication” based on input from researchers, funding bodies and publishers. DNA replication, mitotic spindle formation, chromosome segregation Parliament’s undertaking to understand and assess the value of the peer and cytokinesis must be carefully controlled to ensure that all genetic review process, which remains fundamental to ensuring quality in life information is passed over to the next cell generation. Although the core science publications, should be applauded. The committee concludes cell cycle machinery has been worked out, and the cyclin-dependent that despite its flaws, pre-publication peer review is vital and cannot kinases and cyclins entered the textbooks a long time ago, we still lack be dismantled. However, the report also highlights much-needed a complete understanding of how events of the cell cycle are executed improvements to the process including training of early career scientists and coordinated. In mitosis, the microtubule-based spindle organizes in peer review. The committee recognizes the crucial role of reviewers and duplicated chromosomes to allow the segregation of two identical their tremendous efforts and calls for better recognition of this work, but sets to daughter cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissection of the Molecular Pathology of Usher Syndrome
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/80734 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-10-05 and may be subject to change. Dissection of the molecular pathology of Usher syndrome Erwin van Wijk Erwin van Wijk, 2009 Dissection of the molecular pathology of Usher syndrome Publication of this thesis was financially supported by the Departments of Otorhinolaryngology and Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre; Atos Medical BV; Bayer HealthCare; Carl Zeiss BV; GlaxoSmithKline BV; EmiD audiologische apparatuur; Veenhuis Medical Audio BV; Eurogentec BV; IKS; Artu Biologicals; Schoonenberg Hoorcomfort; Beter Horen BV; Roche Diagnostics Nederland BV. © 2009, Erwin van Wijk, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Cover design: Krijn Ontwerp, Nijmegen Layout: Erwin van Wijk Printed by: Print Partners Ipskamp, Enschede ISBN: 978-90-9024062-6 Dissection of the molecular pathology of Usher syndrome Een wetenschappelijke proeve op het gebied van de Medische Wetenschappen PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. mr. S.C.J.J. Kortmann, volgens besluit van het College van Decanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op vrijdag 29 mei 2009 om 10.30 uur precies door Hendrikus Antonius Rudolfus van Wijk geboren op 22 maart 1975 te Horssen Promotores: Prof. dr. C.W.R.J. Cremers Prof. dr. F.P.M. Cremers Co-promotores: Dr. H. Kremer Dr. R. Roepman Manuscriptcommissie: Prof. dr. J. Schalkwijk (voorzitter) Prof.
    [Show full text]