DOCSLIB.ORG

Dissection of the Molecular Pathology of Usher Syndrome

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dissection of the Molecular Pathology of Usher Syndrome PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/80734 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-10-05 and may be subject to change. Dissection of the molecular pathology of Usher syndrome Erwin van Wijk Erwin van Wijk, 2009 Dissection of the molecular pathology of Usher syndrome Publication of this thesis was financially supported by the Departments of Otorhinolaryngology and Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre; Atos Medical BV; Bayer HealthCare; Carl Zeiss BV; GlaxoSmithKline BV; EmiD audiologische apparatuur; Veenhuis Medical Audio BV; Eurogentec BV; IKS; Artu Biologicals; Schoonenberg Hoorcomfort; Beter Horen BV; Roche Diagnostics Nederland BV. © 2009, Erwin van Wijk, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Cover design: Krijn Ontwerp, Nijmegen Layout: Erwin van Wijk Printed by: Print Partners Ipskamp, Enschede ISBN: 978-90-9024062-6 Dissection of the molecular pathology of Usher syndrome Een wetenschappelijke proeve op het gebied van de Medische Wetenschappen PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. mr. S.C.J.J. Kortmann, volgens besluit van het College van Decanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op vrijdag 29 mei 2009 om 10.30 uur precies door Hendrikus Antonius Rudolfus van Wijk geboren op 22 maart 1975 te Horssen Promotores: Prof. dr. C.W.R.J. Cremers Prof. dr. F.P.M. Cremers Co-promotores: Dr. H. Kremer Dr. R. Roepman Manuscriptcommissie: Prof. dr. J. Schalkwijk (voorzitter) Prof. dr. K. Avraham (Tel Aviv, Israel) Dr. W.J.A.J. Hendriks Table of contents Abbreviations................................................................................................. 7 Chapter 1 : General introduction 1. History of Usher syndrome................................................................... 11 2. The ear............................................................................................... 11 2.1 Development and structure of the cochlea………………………..…… 12 2.2 Sound perception……………………………………………………… 14 2.3 Vestibular system……………………………………………………... 15 3. The eye.............................................................................................. 16 3.1 Development and structure of the retina........................................... 16 3.2 The visual cycle............................................................................. 18 4. Clinical types and evaluation of the Usher syndrome.............................. 19 4.1 Usher syndrome type I.................................................................... 19 4.1.1 Hearing and vestibular impairment........................................ 19 4.1.2 Visual impairment............................................................... 20 4.2 Usher syndrome type II................................................................... 21 4.2.1 Hearing and vestibular impairment........................................ 21 4.2.2 Visual impairment............................................................... 21 4.3 Usher syndrome type III.................................................................. 21 4.3.1 Hearing and vestibular impairment........................................ 21 4.3.2 Visual impairment............................................................... 21 5. Prevalence of Usher syndrome.............................................................. 22 6. Genes and proteins involved in Usher syndrome..................................... 22 6.1 Loci, genes and proteins involved in USH1....................................... 23 6.1.1 USH1b/MYO7A (myosin VIIa)............................................. 23 6.1.2 USH1c/USH1C (harmonin).................................................. 24 6.1.3 USH1d/CDH23 (cadherin 23)............................................... 25 6.1.4 USH1e................................................................................ 26 6.1.5 USH1f/PCDH15 (protocadherin 15)...................................... 26 6.1.6 USH1g/USH1G (SANS)....................................................... 28 6.1.7 USH1h................................................................................ 30 6.2 Loci, genes and proteins involved in USH2....................................... 30 6.2.1 USH2a/USH2A (USH2A/usherin).......................................... 30 6.2.2 USH2c/VLGR1/GPR98 (GPR98)........................................... 31 6.2.3 USH2d/DFNB31 (whirlin).................................................... 32 6.3 Loci, genes and proteins involved in USH3....................................... 34 6.3.1 USH3a/USH3A (clarin-1)..................................................... 34 6.3.2 USH3b............................................................................... 34 7. Outline of this thesis............................................................................ 35 8. References.......................................................................................... 37 Chapter 2 Identification of 51 novel exons of the Usher syndrome type 2A (USH2A) gene that encode multiple conserved functional domains and that are mutated in patients with Usher syndrome type II................................................................................. 51 Chapter 3 Scaffold protein harmonin (USH1c) provides molecular links between Usher syndrome type 1 and type 2................................................................................ 67 Chapter 4 The DFNB31 gene product whirlin connects to the Usher protein network in the cochlea and retina by direct association with USH2A and VLGR1.................... 91 Chapter 5 MPP1 links the Usher protein network and the Crumbs protein complex in the retina.. 119 Chapter 6 Usher syndrome and Leber congenital amaurosis are molecularly linked via a novel isoform of the centrosomal ninein-like protein............................................. 143 Chapter 7 The centrosomal ninein-like protein interacts with MKKS/BBS6 and plays a role in ciliogenesis and early embryonic development...................................... 177 Chapter 8: General discussion 1. The expanding Usher protein network......................................................... 213 2. Biological relevance of the Usher protein complex..................................... 213 3. Dynamics of the Usher protein complex...................................................... 215 4. Function of the Usher protein complex........................................................ 218 4.1 Stereocilia formation and elongation..................................................... 218 4.2 Fibrous links in the inner ear and retina................................................. 218 4.3 Planar cell polarity.................................................................................. 218 4.4 Vesicle docking and transport................................................................ 219 4.5 Synapse formation and synaptic transmission........................................ 220 4.6 Apico-basal polarity............................................................................... 220 5. Linking diseases: LCA, RP, USH, BBS, non-syndromic deafness............. 221 6. Involvement of the novel members of the protein network in disease........ 222 7. Future prospects and directions................................................................... 223 8. References................................................................................................... 225 Summary/Samenvatting.................................................................................. 231 Dankwoord………………………………………………………………………….. 239 List of publications………………………………………………………………... 245 Curriculum vitae……………………………………………………………………. 251 Appendix: colour atlas.................................................................................... 255 Abbreviations a.a. : amino acid ALA : ankle link antigen ANK : ankyrin arRP : autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa BB : basal body BBS : Bardet-Biedl syndrome Calx : Ca2+-binding calcium exchanger β CASK : calcium/calmodulin-dependent serine protein kinase CC : connecting cilium CDH23 : cadherin 23 CIP-98 : CASK interacting protein 98 kDa cM : centimorgan CNS : central nervous system DIG : digoxigenin DTT : 1,4-dithiothreitol eCFP : enhanced cyan fluorescent protein EGF : epidermal growth factor EM : electronmicroscopy ERG : electroretinography ESTs : expressed sequence tags FN3 : fibronectin type III GPR98 : G-protein coupled receptor 98 kDa GST : glutathion-S-transferase HA : hemagglutinin Hz : Hertz IHC : inner hair cell INL : inner nuclear layer IPL : inner plexiform layer IS : inner segment ISH : in situ hybridization kDa : kilodalton LamG : laminin G-like LamNT : laminin N-terminal LCA : Leber congenital amaurosis MAGUK : membrane-associated guanylate kinase MPP : membrane palmitoylated protein mRFP : monomeric red fluorescent protein MRI : magnetic resonance imaging MYO7A : myosin VIIa MYO15A : myosin XVa NBC3 : sodium bicarbonate transporter 3 Ngl-1 : netrin-G1 ligand Nlp : Ninein-like protein NLS : nuclear localisation signal NMDA : N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor OHC : outer hair cell OKR : optokinetic response 7 OLM : outer limiting membrane ONL : outer nuclear layer OPL : outer plexiform layer OS : outer segment PBM : PDZ-binding motif PBS : phosphate buffered saline PCDH15 : protocadherin 15 PDE : phosphodiesterase PDZ
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Human CPAP and CP110 in Centriole Elongation and Ciliogenesis
    Human CPAP and CP110 in Centriole Elongation and Ciliogenesis Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften der Fakultät für Biologie der Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München Vorgelegt von Thorsten I. Schmidt München, 2010 Dissertation eingereicht am: 11.05.2010 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 25.10.2010 Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Erich A. Nigg Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Angelika Böttger Hiermit erkläre ich, dass ich die vorliegende Dissertation selbständig und ohne unerlaubte Hilfe angefertigt habe. Sämtliche Experimente wurden von mir selbst durchgeführt, soweit nicht explizit auf Dritte verwiesen wird. Ich habe weder an anderer Stelle versucht, eine Dissertation oder Teile einer solchen einzureichen bzw. einer Prüfungskommission vorzulegen, noch eine Doktorprüfung zu absolvieren. München, den 11.05.2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SUMMARY............................................................................................................................1 2. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................2 2.1 Function and Structure of the Centrosome.....................................................................2 2.1.1 The Centrosome as MTOC in Proliferating Cells .................................................2 2.1.2 The Centriole as Template for Cilia and Flagella .................................................3 2.1.3 Molecular Composition and Structure of the Centrosome....................................3 2.2
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanisms of Centriole Duplication and Their Deregulation in Disease
    REVIEWS Once and only once: mechanisms of centriole duplication and their deregulation in disease Erich A. Nigg1 and Andrew J. Holland2 Abstract | Centrioles are conserved microtubule-based organelles that form the core of the centrosome and act as templates for the formation of cilia and flagella. Centrioles have important roles in most microtubule-related processes, including motility, cell division and cell signalling. To coordinate these diverse cellular processes, centriole number must be tightly controlled. In cycling cells, one new centriole is formed next to each pre-existing centriole in every cell cycle. Advances in imaging, proteomics, structural biology and genome editing have revealed new insights into centriole biogenesis, how centriole numbers are controlled and how alterations in these processes contribute to diseases such as cancer and neurodevelopmental disorders. Moreover, recent work has uncovered the existence of surveillance pathways that limit the proliferation of cells with numerical centriole aberrations. Owing to this progress, we now have a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms governing centriole biogenesis, opening up new possibilities for targeting these pathways in the context of human disease. Procentriole Centrosomes function in animal cells as microtubule Centrosome structure and assembly A newly constructed centriole organizing centres and thus have key roles in regulat­ Centriole duplication and centrosome assembly are that is unable to duplicate. ing cell shape, polarity and motility, as well as spindle complex processes that need to be tightly regulated dur­ formation, chromosome segregation and cyto kinesis1–4. ing proliferation and development. Key components A typical animal cell begins the cell cycle with a single involved in these processes have recently been identified, centrosome, comprising a pair of centrioles.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Report
    MEETING REPORT Exploring the pole: an EMBO conference on centrosomes and spindle pole bodies Sue L. Jaspersen and Tim Stearns The centrosome and spindle pole body community gathered for its triennial meeting from 12–16 September, 2008 at EMBL in Heidelberg (Germany). Sponsored by the EMBO, the conference on Centrioles are short, cylindrical structures in constituent proteins, and the identification centrosomes and spindle pole bodies was which the walls of the cylinder are made up of of those that are key functional components, organized by Trisha Davis, Susan Dutcher, nine specialized triplet microtubules. This elegant as opposed to hangers-on that use the centro- Michael Knop, Robert Palazzo, Elmar Schiebel nine-fold symmetry is absolutely conserved and some as a cellular assembly point. At the first and Kip Sluder. This was the fourth meeting gives centrioles their characteristic ‘pinwheel’ meeting twelve years ago, John Kilmartin’s in a series that started in 1996 and, as with the appearance in cross-section. Separate from their mass-spectrometry analysis of the SPB4 was previous meetings1–3, was an occasion to cel- role as a focus of PCM, centrioles also nucleate the a prescient first glimpse of the cornucopia of ebrate present accomplishments and contem- ciliary axoneme, imparting their nine-fold sym- centrosome proteins that would soon emerge plate the future. Below we summarize some of metry to this structure as well. A centriole at the from similar work on centrosomes, centrioles the major themes that emerged. base of a cilium is referred to as a basal body. and cilia. Whereas we once had the sense of The centrosome, with its pair of centrioles, having hold of only the trunk, leg or tail of the Centrosome 101 duplicates once per cell cycle at the G1/S tran- proverbial centrosomal elephant, new results Microtubules and their constellation of asso- sition so that a cell will have exactly two cen- are revealing a much more complete picture of ciated proteins and structures are strongly trosomes during mitosis.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Faseb Science Research Conferences Advisory Committee Meeting
    Proposal #: 15-19 2013 FASEB SCIENCE RESEARCH CONFERENCES ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING TOPIC FOR CONSIDERATION TOPIC NAME: MITOSIS: SPINDLE ASSEMBLY AND FUNCTION PREVIOUS TITLE: Mitosis: Spindle Assembly and Function SUBMITTED BY: Erich Nigg, Biozentrum der Universitat Basel Rebecca Heald, University of California-Berkeley YEAR REQUESTED FOR 2015 SCHEDULING: SITE REQUESTS: 1. Portugal 2. Nassau, Bahamas 3. Big Sky, MT DATE REQUESTS: 1. June 21-27, 2015 2. June 28-July 3, 2015 3. September 6-12, 2015 YEAR(S) CONFERENCE 2007, 2009, 2012 HAS BEEN HELD: NOTES: Avoid mid-to-late June dates if Gordon Conferences has similar conferences at that time. FASEB SRC Proposal Instructions Attached are the instructions and requirements for submitting a FASEB SRC proposal. Please complete sections 1-6 before submitting your information. Please submit your proposal by September 23, 2013 in order to be considered for the 2015 SRC Series. Proposals will be reviewed by the FASEB Science Research Conference Advisory Committee in mid November. Shortly thereafter, you will receive a letter with the committee’s decision on your submitted proposal. By the end of January 2014 you will receive a second letter which will indicate the location and date for your conference as well as the name of your assigned Conference Manager. Once your conference is approved, your conference manager will schedule a kick-off conference call to discuss timelines, expectations, instructions on fund raising, and program management to help make your organization process successful. Section 1: Organizer Responsibilities By submitting a FASEB Science Research Conference proposal for consideration by the FASEB SRC Advisory Committee, the organizer(s) accepts the responsibility for producing a successful conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Personal Data
    Curriculum Vitae Personal Data Surname: Meraldi Given name: Patrick Gender: male Date and place of birth: Zurich, 27. 09. 1972 Nationality: Swiss Mail: [email protected] Address: Centre Medical Universitaire, PHYME, Rue Michel Servet 1, 1211 Genève 4 Web: http://www.unige.ch/medecine/phym/en/groupes/922meraldi/ Present Position From 09 / 2012: Associate Professor in the Department of Cellular Physiology and Metabolism, Medical Faculty, University of Geneva, Switzerland Education 1997 - 1999 PhD studies in Molecular Biology with Prof. Erich Nigg, Department of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, Switzerland, working on the centrosome cycle 1996 Certificat in Molecular Biology with Prof. Erich Nigg, Department of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, Switzerland 1995 Diplomawork with Prof. Joseph Brunner, Institute of Biochemistry, ETH Zurich, Switzerland 1991 – 1995 Undergraduate studies in Biology, ETH Zurich, Switzerland Past Research Experience 2005 – 2012 SNF-professor, Institute of Biochemistry, ETH Zurich, Switzerland working on human cell division 2002 – 2005 EMBO post-doctoral fellow with Prof. Peter Sorger, Department of Biology, MIT, Cambridge, USA working on the spindle checkpoint and kinetochores 1999 – 2002 SNF post-doctoral fellow with Prof. Erich Nigg, Max-Planck-Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany working on the origin of supernumerary centrosomes Awards and Fellowships 2011 Ernst Theodor Jucker prize for Cancer Research (Ernst Theodor Jucker foundation) 2011 Walther Flemming Medal (from the German
    [Show full text]
  • Nigg Brochure.Pub
    The Department of Biochemistry About the Beach Lectures Presents David W. Beach was born in 1925 in London, England. Following service in the Royal Navy, he was married to Doris Holmes and began his ca- reer as a Chartered Accountant. Feeling the urge to expand his hori- zons, he moved to CanadaTHE and DAVID began a series W. ofBEACH jobs in the aluminum The 2009 Beach Distinguished Lectures industry that included General Manager of Kawneer, Canada and Vice- President of Kawneer,MEMORIAL Inc. LECTURESHIP IN BIOCHEMISTRY As Vice-President of ALUMAX Aluminum Corporation he was instru- mental in making it one of the largest and most profitable aluminum October 26-October 27 companies in the world, prior to his retirement. Inspired by his son’s enthusiasm for science, he has chosen to share his good fortune by sup- porting this biochemistry graduate program. This long-term support is intended to promote intellectual curiosity, a commitment to excellence, and an appreciation of science in all those involved. Previous Speakers in the David Beach Lecture Series 2008 Tom Kunkel National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2007 David Allis The Rockefeller University 2006 Chris Somerville Carnegie Institution and Stanford University 2005 Mark Stitt Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology 2004 Craig Garner Stanford University 2000 Timothy J. Richmond Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Dr. Erich Nigg Zurich, Switzerland 2000 Gerald Joyce The Scripps Research Institute University of Basel, Switzerland Department of Cell Biology Department of Biochemistry 175 S. University St. West Lafayette, IN 47907 Phone: 765-494-1600 www.biochem.purdue.edu Brief Biography Cell Cycle Control: Focus on the Centrosome Cycle Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Focus on Cell Cycle and DNA Damage
    EDITORIAL Focus on Cell cycle and DNA UK Parliament comments on damage peer review How cells accurately duplicate and segregate their Recognizing the importance of sound scientific advice genetic information remains a topic of intense to the government, the UK Parliament has examined research. A series of specially commissioned articles in the peer review system. this issue presents recent insights into different aspects In July, the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee of the cell division cycle and genomic surveillance. published a comprehensive report “Peer review in scientific publication” based on input from researchers, funding bodies and publishers. DNA replication, mitotic spindle formation, chromosome segregation Parliament’s undertaking to understand and assess the value of the peer and cytokinesis must be carefully controlled to ensure that all genetic review process, which remains fundamental to ensuring quality in life information is passed over to the next cell generation. Although the core science publications, should be applauded. The committee concludes cell cycle machinery has been worked out, and the cyclin-dependent that despite its flaws, pre-publication peer review is vital and cannot kinases and cyclins entered the textbooks a long time ago, we still lack be dismantled. However, the report also highlights much-needed a complete understanding of how events of the cell cycle are executed improvements to the process including training of early career scientists and coordinated. In mitosis, the microtubule-based spindle organizes in peer review. The committee recognizes the crucial role of reviewers and duplicated chromosomes to allow the segregation of two identical their tremendous efforts and calls for better recognition of this work, but sets to daughter cells.
    [Show full text]