Villagization
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Villagization A case study of Ethiopia’s villagization programme By Mads Holm Table of content ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................................................... 3 ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 WHAT IS VILLAGIZATION? ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 RESEARCH ON RESETTLEMENT AND VILLAGIZATION ........................................................................................................ 8 1.3 RESEARCH QUESTION: .......................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.4 READING GUIDE ..................................................................................................................................................................... 10 2. METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................................................. 12 2.1 METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................................................................................... 12 2.2 RESEARCH DESIGN ................................................................................................................................................................ 12 2.3 LIMITATION ............................................................................................................................................................................ 14 2.4 RESEARCH EXPERIENCES ..................................................................................................................................................... 15 3. THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................................................. 18 3.1 THE IMPOVERISH RISK AND RECONSTRUCTION MODEL ............................................................................................... 18 3.2 THE EIGHT MAJOR IMPOVERISHMENT RISKS .................................................................................................................... 20 3.3 RECONSTRUCTION COMPONENTS ...................................................................................................................................... 24 3.4 IMPLEMENTATION APPROACHES: TOP-DOWN OR BOTTOM-UP? ................................................................................. 27 3.5 PRELIMINARY ARGUMENT/HYPOTHESIS OF THIS THESIS .............................................................................................. 28 4. HISTORICAL VILLAGIZATION PROGRAMMES ........................................................................................... 29 5. THE CASE: ETHIOPIA ......................................................................................................................................... 31 5.1 ETHIOPIA ................................................................................................................................................................................ 31 5.2 A HISTORY OF VILLAGIZATION ............................................................................................................................................ 35 5.3 WHAT DOES THE THEORETICAL ASSUMPTIONS SAY? ..................................................................................................... 38 6. CONTEMPORARY VILLAGIZATION IN ETHIOPIA ..................................................................................... 41 6.1 THE OFFICIAL OBJECTIVES OF THE PROGRAMME ............................................................................................................ 41 6.2 ASSESSMENTS OF THE PROGRAMME .................................................................................................................................. 42 6.3 ASSESSMENT BASED ON EMPIRICAL FINDINGS FROM THE FIELD ................................................................................. 54 7. REFLECTIONS ...................................................................................................................................................... 67 7.1 WHY SUCH DIFFERENT ASSESSMENTS AND WHAT IS THE REAL PICTURE? ................................................................ 67 1 7.2 IS THE CURRENT PROGRAMME ANY DIFFERENT FROM THE DERG’S AND OTHER HISTORICAL VILLAGIZATION PROGRAMMES? .............................................................................................................................................................................. 69 7.3 OTHER POSSIBLE THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES .............................................................................................................. 70 7.4 POLICY SUGGESTIONS ........................................................................................................................................................... 74 8. CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................................ 76 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................................. 78 2 Abstract Villagization programmes have been implemented around the world in governments’ attempts to realize political agendas, usually with very limited success. Ethiopia is in this regard an interesting country, as succeeding governments have used villagization to promote their own agenda, which is also valid for the current government of the country. The objective for the contemporary villagization programme in Ethiopia is to ensure socio-economic development for the participants by delivering socio-economic services to them. It is promoted as being based on voluntary participation, which would be different from the previous government’s and many other villagization programmes in history. Much negative attention to the programme has though been given from large international organizations. They accuse the government of violating human rights, forced participation, unfulfilled promises and relate it to other negative issues such as land grabbing. The government on the other hand emphasize that these are false accusations and portrait the programme as very successful, as the participants already have gained many of the promised benefits by being included in the programme. The research of the thesis unfortunately shows that the portrait painted by the government does not hold up. People of the programme have gained better access to services then before, but to a much smaller degree then promised. Many of the socio-economic services that should have been provided are not and people are thus participating without full knowledge of what they are joining. Participation is therefore still not considered to be voluntary. It is further evident that the people do not have any say in how the new villages are being organized, which from the start of the programme makes them marginalized in their new settings. This top-down implementation approach from the government must be changed if the current villagization programme should have a real change to become a successful development programme. On a more positive note, the programme is found to have a great change of becoming a success if the critical elements of it are changed, as much of the population of Ethiopia knows that a change towards more sustainable lifestyles are needed and they are willing to do so, because of the harsh environment they are living in. 3 Acronyms AAU Addis Ababa University DAG Development Assistance Group DIDR Development-Induced Displacement and Resettlement HRW Human Rights Watch IRR model Impoverishment Risk and Reconstruction Model IO Oakland Institute MDGs Millennium Development Goals MoA Ministry of Agriculture NGO Non-Governmental Organization PA Peasant association PBS Provision of Basic Services programme PSNP Production Safety Net Programme SNNRP Southern Nation, Nationalities and People’s Region 4 1. Introduction For decades, resettlement programmes have been implemented in different forms around the world. The purposes of these programmes have usually been related to developmental objectives or political ideologies. It can be done on a small scale with only one person being resettled due to e.g. smaller infrastructure projects or whole communities being resettled due to droughts, large infrastructure projects, political agendas or to achieve socio-economic development for an underdeveloped and vulnerable population by for example villagization. Over the years, especially large-scale resettlements have generated much attention. These have mainly been implemented in poorer countries as attempts to develop the particular country and its people. Unfortunately, the attention has mainly been negative due to inefficient implementation and unsuccessful outcomes of these large resettlement programmes, which has made many parties very cautious in dealing with resettlement.