DOCSLIB.ORG

Obstacles to the Right of Free Movement of EU Citizens

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Obstacles to the Right of Free Movement of EU Citizens DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT C: CITIZENS' RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS PETITIONS Obstacles to the right of free movement and residence for EU citizens and their families Comparative Analysis STUDY Abstract This study, commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the LIBE and PETI Committees, presents a synthesis of in-depth studies in nine Member States in addition to broader EU and national research. Based on an analysis of selected provisions of Directive 2004/38/EC in Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Poland, Spain, Sweden and the UK, it identifies the main persisting barriers to free movement for EU citizens and their family members. The study also examines discriminatory restrictions to free movement, measures to counter abuse of rights and refusals of entry and residence rights, in addition to expulsions. It finds that, ten years after the deadline for transposition, there is general compliance, though some challenges remain. More systematic data collection, evaluation and guidance is thus required. The nine country studies are made available separately. PE 571.375 EN ABOUT THE PUBLICATION This research paper was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and Committee on Petitions and was commissioned, supervised and published by the Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs. Policy departments provide independent expertise, both in-house and externally, to support European Parliament committees and other parliamentary bodies in shaping legislation and exercising democratic scrutiny over EU external and internal policies. To contact the Policy Department for Citizen's Rights and Constitutional Affairs or to subscribe to its newsletter, please write to: [email protected] Research Administrators Responsible Ottavio MARZOCCHI and Darren NEVILLE Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] PROJECT MANAGERS/AUTHORS Marta BALLESTEROS, Principal Legal Advisor, Milieu Ltd. Gillian KELLY, Legal Advisor, Milieu Ltd. Nathalie MEURENS, Legal Advisor, Milieu Ltd. Anna PEREGO, Legal Researcher, Milieu Ltd. SENIOR EXPERT Jo SHAW, Director of the Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, University of Edinburgh NATIONAL EXPERTS Austria Elena FRIES-TERSCH Belgium Nathalie MEURENS and Jozefien VAN CAENEGHEM Bulgaria Zravka OUGRINOVA, Elena VARBANOVA and Aleksandar DORICH Cyprus Valentina DIMITRIOU Croatia Damir PETROVIC Czech Republic Hana SPANIKOVA Denmark Nina Joye SMITH Estonia Kristjan KALDUR Finland Laura ISOTALO and Johanna SKIPPARI France Jean-Christophe NICAISE CHATEAU, Vanessa LEIGH, Sophie MOREL and Isabell BÜSCHEL Germany Ferdinand WOLLENSCHLAGER Greece Magdalini-Emmanouela KOLLATOU Hungary Katalin CSÁSZÁR Ireland Gillian KELLY Italy Silvia BRUNELLO and Anna PEREGO Latvia Linda DE KEYSER Lithuania Monika RUDYTE Luxembourg Laura JACQUES and Benoit CAVEZ Malta Emma PSAILA Netherlands Nienke VAN DER BURGT and Sophie VANCAUWENBERGH Poland Paulina ROICKA Portugal Gonçalo MOREIRA Romania Mihaela MATEI Slovakia Zuzana LUKACOVA Slovenia Neža Kogovšek ŠALAMON Spain Roberto VALLINA HOSET and Carmen ROMAN VACA Sweden Ida Otken ERIKSSON and Hanna PETTERSSON United Kingdom Stephanie REYNOLDS LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN Manuscript completed in September 2016 © European Union, 2016 This document is available on the internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/supporting-analyses DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs __________________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 8 LIST OF TABLES 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 1. INTRODUCTION 17 1.1. Legal Context 17 1.2. Application of Directive 2004/38 until 2008 19 1.3. Objective and methodology 21 2. OVERVIEW OF THE TRANSPOSITION OF KEY PROVISIONS OF THE DIRECTIVE IN MEMBER STATES 24 2.1. Context: Difficulties in Transposition 24 2.2. Overview of the transposition of key provisions of the Directive 27 2.2.1. Analysis based on selected provisions 27 2.2.2. Transposition challenges regarding the selected provisions 29 2.2.3. Additional transposition issues in the selected Member States 34 2.2.4. Topical transposition issues 37 2.3. CJEU interpretation of the Directive 48 3. ANALYSIS OF THE PRIMARY BARRIERS TO THE RIGHT TO ENTRY 51 3.1. EU Legislation 51 3.2. EU citizens 52 3.2.1. Obligation to report their presence in the Member State within an unreasonable period of time 53 3.2.2. Others 53 3.3. Family members of EU citizens 54 3.3.1. Accelerated procedure for entry visas refused 54 3.3.2. Excessive delays in obtaining a visa 55 3.3.3. Visas not issued free of charge 56 3.3.4. Refusal of visa on invalid grounds or without a justified reason 56 3.3.5. Excessive documentation required to obtain a visa 57 3.3.6. Scarce and confusing information regarding visas 58 3.3.7. Others 58 4 Obstacles to the right of free movement and residence for EU citizens and their families- Comparative analysis __________________________________________________________________________________________ 4. ANALYSIS OF THE PRIMARY BARRIERS TO THE RIGHT TO RESIDENCE 59 4.1. EU Legislation 59 4.2. Recurring obstacles 61 4.2.1. Excessive delays 61 4.2.2. Excessive documentation requirements 62 4.2.3. Denial of the right of residence on invalid grounds 64 4.2.4. Lack of information concerning the right of residence 65 4.2.5. Restrictive interpretation of proof of health insurance 66 4.2.6. The situation of TCN family members of EU citizens 67 5. ANALYSIS OF THE PRIMARY BARRIERS RELATED TO SOCIAL SECURITY 68 5.1. Directive 2004/38 and other EU acts 68 5.2. Types of benefit 69 5.2.1. Old age pensions 69 5.2.2. Health care 71 5.2.3. Family benefits 72 5.2.4. Unemployment benefits 73 5.3. Main types of obstacles 73 5.3.1. Lack of coordination and communication between national authorities of different Member States 73 5.3.2. Social security contributions 75 5.3.3. Ignorance of the rules determining the applicable legislation 75 6. OTHER RECURRING BARRIERS 77 6.1. Accessing employment in other Member States 77 6.1.1. Non-recognition of professional qualifications from other Member States 77 6.2. Using vehicles in another Member State 78 6.2.1. Requirement to register vehicles in another Member State 78 6.2.2. Vehicle taxation for use of a foreign car 79 6.3. Double taxation 80 6.4. Administrative Services 80 6.4.1. Difficulties in obtaining information 81 6.4.2. Poor quality of the information available 81 5 Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs __________________________________________________________________________________________ 6.5. Additional requirements for EU citizens seeking to register to vote/stand as a candidate in European and municipal elections in another Member State 82 6.6. Issues with the recognition of diplomas from another Member State 83 7. REVIEW OF LEGAL OR PRACTICAL INSTANCES OF DISCRIMINATION 84 7.1. EU non-discrimination requirements in the context of free movement 85 7.2. Discrimination on grounds of nationality 87 7.2.1. Discrimination on grounds of nationality in accessing employment: 87 7.2.2. Discrimination on grounds of nationality in accessing education 91 7.2.3. Discrimination due to fees/price differences and discrimination in access to services 92 7.3. Discrimination on grounds of civil status/sexual orientation 94 7.3.1. Recognition of same-sex partnerships in Member States’ legislation 95 7.3.2. Recognition of same-sex couples in a civil partnership and free movement rights 96 7.3.3. Discrimination against same-sex couples in a civil partnership in exercising their free movement and residence rights 97 7.4. Discrimination on grounds of racial or ethnic origin 100 7.4.1. Discriminatory barriers for Roma in exercising their rights to residence 100 7.4.2. Roma inhibited from accessing employment in EU Member States 103 7.4.3. Discriminatory barriers for Roma in accessing education, housing, social assistance and services 104 8. COMPARATIVE OVERVIEW OF MEMBER STATES MEASURES TO COUNTER ABUSE OF RIGHTS 106 8.1. Overview of the Directive’s requirements on measures to counter abuse of rights 106 8.2. Comparative overview of national measures 109 8.2.1. Marriages of convenience 109 8.2.2. Fraud 111 8.2.3. Sanctions 112 8.2.4. Impact of these measures on the right to free movement and residence 112 8.2.5. Implementation of these measures in practice 113 9. OVERVIEW OF THE EXTENT OF THE REFUSAL OF ENTRY AND RESIDENCE EXPULSIONS IN MEMBER STATES 115 9.1. The Directive 115 6 Obstacles to the right of free movement and residence for EU citizens and their families- Comparative analysis __________________________________________________________________________________________ 9.2. Overview of existing data 118 9.2.1. Refusal of entry 118 9.2.2. Refusal of residence rights 119 9.2.3. Expulsions 121 9.3. Main problems identified 122 9.3.1. Economic grounds 122 9.3.2. Public policy and public security 124 9.3.3. Increasing level of protection 126 9.3.4. Vagueness of grounds justifying refusals of entry, residence and expulsions 127 9.3.5. Safeguards 128 10. CONCLUSIONS 130 11. RECOMMENDATIONS 134 11.1. Recommendations for the European Parliament and the European Commission 134 11.1.1. Recommendation 1: Collect more systematic and comparable information and data at Member State level 134 11.1.2. Recommendation 2: Enforce full transposition 134 11.1.3. Recommendation 3: Clarify terms 135 11.1.4. Recommendation 4: Address citizens’ complaints as a priority and supplement SOLVIT with a hotline 137 11.1.5.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bulgaria 2000
    Welcome to Bulgaria 2000 ISTANBUL, Turkey May, 1999 By Whitney Mason With his stylishly coifed hair and well-cut clothes, Giorgi Kuzmov, known as "George" to his many foreign friends, might not look like someone interested in international affairs. My old friend Frederic, working at the French Embassy in Sofia as the attachd audiovisuel, had introduced me to George because, as one of Bulgaria's top TV executives, he knew a lot of Bulgarians who spoke English and most of them happened to be beautiful young women. But one of the joys of the Balkans, for a reporter, is that here politics is not a subject of interest only to specialists but a universally fascinating aspect of the drama of everyday life. And so it was perfectly natural that night, as Giorgi and I drove through Sofia's pot-holed streets in his Dodge Voyager van, that he brought up the sub- ject of Kosovo, where NATO would begin air strikes a few weeks later. Wasn't it hypocritical of the U.S. to moralize about Kosovo, Giorgi asked rhetorically, while never raising any opposition to Turkey's oppression of the Kurds? Since then, I have heard that question repeated many times; I have never had a re- sponse to offer. A cool acid jazz tune by US3 was playing loudly when we walked into E1 Cabana. Giorgi introduced me to three beautiful friends and ordered gin and tonics all around before segueing seamlessly back to Kosovo. "What would Americans say if blacks in New Orleans (where he'd just spent ten days) de- clared that they wanted independence?" Giorgi asked.
    [Show full text]
  • Identity Documents Act (2000, Amended 2017)
    Issuer: Riigikogu Type: act In force from: 01.04.2017 In force until: 30.06.2017 Translation published: 28.03.2017 Identity Documents Act1 Passed 15.02.1999 RT I 1999, 25, 365 Entry into force 01.01.2000 Amended by the following acts Passed Published Entry into force 08.03.2000 RT I 2000, 26, 150 15.12.2000 21.03.2000 RT I 2000, 25, 148 29.03.2000 17.05.2000 RT I 2000, 40, 254 01.08.2000 08.11.2000 RT I 2000, 86, 550 02.12.2000 17.01.2001 RT I 2001, 16, 68 16.02.2001 07.03.2001 RT I 2001, 31, 173 07.04.2001 12.06.2001 RT I 2001, 56, 338 07.07.2001 19.06.2002 RT I 2002, 61, 375 01.08.2002 19.06.2002 RT I 2002, 63, 387 01.09.2002 15.10.2002 RT I 2002, 90, 516 01.12.2002 15.01.2003 RT I 2003, 13, 65 01.05.2003 22.01.2003 RT I 2003, 15, 87 27.02.2003 03.12.2003 RT I 2003, 78, 527 01.01.2004 17.12.2003 RT I 2004, 2, 4 16.01.2004 14.04.2004 RT I 2004, 28, 189 01.05.2004 14.12.2005 RT I 2006, 2, 3 01.07.2006 15.02.2006 RT I 2006, 12, 79 01.04.2006 17.05.2006 RT I 2006, 26, 191 01.08.2006 10.05.2006 RT I 2006, 26, 193 01.01.2007 07.06.2006 RT I 2006, 29, 221 28.08.2006, partially02.01.2007 14.11.2007 RT I 2007, 62, 394 Entry into force upon accession of Estonia to the European Union common visa space partially 21.12.2007 and partially 30.03.2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Estonia Statelessness
    Ending Childhood A Study on Estonia Statelessness: Working Paper 04/15 EUROPEAN NETWORK ON STATELESSNESS © European Network on Statelessness. All Rights Reserved. This paper and sections thereof may be distributed and reproduced without formal permission for the purposes of non-commercial research, private study, news reporting and training, provided that the material is appropriately attributed to the authors and the copyright-holder. This working paper was commissioned by the European Network on Statelessness (ENS) a civil society alliance with 100 members in over 30 countries, committed to addressing statelessness in Europe. Among other objectives, ENS advocates for the enjoyment of a right to a nationality by all. This working paper is part of a series that has been produced in support of the ENS Campaign “None of Europe’s children should be stateless” which was launched in November 2014. ENS wishes to acknowledge the generous support for this campaign received from the Sigrid Rausing Trust and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). This paper was researched and written by Aleksei Semjonov, Director; Jelena Karzetskaja, Lawyer; and Elena Ezhova, Lawyer – Legal Information Centre for Human Rights (an ENS Associate Member). European Network on Statelessness Club Union House, 253-254 Upper Street London, N1 1RY United Kingdom Charity Number 1158414 [email protected] www.statelessness.eu For further information about ENS, its activities or proposals for research or other collaboration, contact ENS Director Chris Nash at [email protected]. The Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion is an Expert Partner for the ENS Campaign ‘None of Europe’s Children should be stateless.
    [Show full text]
  • Ction Taken by Governments on the Recommendations Adopted
    Official No. : C.133.M.48.1929.VIII. [C .C .T . 384.] Geneva, June 1929. LEAGUE OF NATIONS Advisory and Technical Committee for Communications and Transit CTION TAKEN BY GOVERNMENTS ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS ADOPTED BY THE SECOND CONFERENCE ON THE INTERNATIONAL REGIME OF PASSPORTS GENEVA 1929 Series ol League of Nations Publications VIII. TRANSIT 1929. VIII. 4. LEAGUE OF NATIONS ADVISORY AND TECHNICAL COMMITTEE FOR COMMUNICATIONS AND TRANSIT Action taken by Governments on the Recommendations adopted by the Second Conference on the International Regime of Passports In accordance with the request of the Advisory and Technical Committee for Communications and Transit, the Secretary-General of the League of Nations forwarded to Governments, under date April 20th, 1928, a circular letter, as follows : ( C.L.65.1928. VI I I.) Geneva, April 20th, 1928. At the request of the Chairman of the Advisory and Technical Committee for Communications and Transit, I have the honour to ask you to be good enough to inform me what action has been taken in . on the recommendations adopted by the Second Conference on the International Regime of Passports, held at Geneva from May 12th to 18th, 1926. At its twelfth session (February 27th to March 2nd, 1928) the Advisory and Technical Committee for Com­ munications and Transit expressed the desire that this information might be received, if possible, before October 1st, 1928. (Signed) DuFOUR-:FERONCE, U nder-Secrelary-General. S.d.N. 50(F.) lO (A.) 3/29+50 (F.) 30 (A. ) (epr.) 5/29+780 (F.) 720 (A.) 6/29 Imp. Granchamp, Annemasse. - 4 - FOLLOWING ARE EXTRACTS FROM REPLIES RECEIVED, AS A RESULT OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL'S ENClUIRY AUSTRALIA August 1928.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinship Terminology in Karashevo (Banat, Romania) // Slověne
    Patterns and Паттерны и Mechanisms of механизмы Lexical Changes in the лексических Languages of Symbiotic изменений в языках Communities: симбиотических Kinship Terminology сообществ: термины in Karashevo родства в Карашево (Banat, Romania) (Банат, Румыния) Daria V. Konior Дарья Владимировна Конёр The Institute for Linguistic Studies Институт лингвистических исследований of the Russian Academy of Sciences Российской академии наук St. Petersburg, Russia С.-Петербург, Россия Abstract This article deals with the ethnolinguistic situation in one of the most archaic areas of language and cultural contact between South Slavic and Eastern Ro- mance populations—the Karashevo microregion in Banat, Romania. For the fi rst time, the lexical-semantic group of kinship terms in the Krashovani dia- lects from the Slavic-speaking village of Carașova and the Romanian-speak- ing village of Iabalcea is being analysed in a comparative perspective as two Цитирование: Konior D. V. Patterns and Mechanisms of Lexical Changes in the Languages of Symbiotic Communities: Kinship Terminology in Karashevo (Banat, Romania) // Slověne. 2020. Vol. 9, № 1. C. 381–411. Citation: Konior D. V. (2019) Patterns and Mechanisms of Lexical Changes in the Languages of Symbiotic Communities: Kinship Terminology in Karashevo (Banat, Romania). Slověne, Vol. 9, № 1, p. 381–411. DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.1.14 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International 2020 №1 Slověne Patterns and Mechanisms of Lexical Changes in the Languages of Symbiotic Communities: 382 | Kinship Terminology in Karashevo (Banat, Romania) separate linguistic codes which “serve” the same local culture. The main goal of the research was to investigate patterns of borrowing mechanisms which could link lexical (sub)systems of spiritual culture under the conditions of in- timate language contact in symbiotic communities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Bulgarian Nationalism and Russia's Influence Upon It
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-2014 The rise of Bulgarian nationalism and Russia's influence upon it. Lin Wenshuang University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Wenshuang, Lin, "The rise of Bulgarian nationalism and Russia's influence upon it." (2014). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1548. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/1548 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE RISE OF BULGARIAN NATIONALISM AND RUSSIA‘S INFLUENCE UPON IT by Lin Wenshuang B. A., Beijing Foreign Studies University, China, 1997 M. A., Beijing Foreign Studies University, China, 2002 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Humanities University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky May 2014 Copyright © 2014 by Lin Wenshuang All Rights Reserved THE RISE OF BULGARIAN NATIONALISM AND RUSSIA‘S INFLUENCE UPON IT by Lin Wenshuang B. A., Beijing Foreign Studies University, China, 1997 M. A., Beijing Foreign Studies University, China, 2002 A Dissertation Approved on April 1, 2014 By the following Dissertation Committee __________________________________ Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • ADM Chapter C1: Universal Credit - International Issues
    A#& Chapter C'( Universal Credit - International Issues Subpages • Introduction C1 1 • $verview of the 4ules C1 2 • Defnitions C1 ' - C1 ') • .ersons 6ubject to I11i"ration control, As0lu1 6eekers 9 Dual :ationals C1 & - C111) • The .resence Condition C11# - C11(* • .ersons /ho do not have to satisf0 the condition that they be ;in <=” C11(( - C1##& • ?abitual 4esidence C1##* - C1#%! • .ersons /ith specifc ri"hts to reside C1#%) - C1& 2 • <enuine .rospect of +or8 2<.oW) C1& ' - C1&* • 6elf-employed persons C1&*1 - C1&%) • Mini1u1 Earnin"s Threshold C1&! - C1* ) • CJEU Judg1ent 6aint .riA vB 66+. C1*1 - C1*'* • A2 :ationals 2:ationals of =ul"aria and 4omania) C1*'( - C1*)* • Ca1il0 Members of +or8ers and 6elf-employed persons C1*)( - C1(!) • 4i"ht to 4eside - ?abitual 4esidence Test Applies C1() - C1!* • .ersons to be treated as not ;in <=” C1!*1 - C1!() • EU 6ettlement 6cheme 2EU663 C1!% - C1)#' • Croatian :ationals C1)#& - C1)&* • Meanin" of ;?abitual 4esidence” C1)&( - C1)%* • Absences from <= C1)%( - C1)!* • Temporar0 Absences C1)!( - C1))) Introduction C',,' Introduction -See &emo ADM './0,1 C1 1 This section provides "uidance for Decision-Ma8ers about the international aspects of UC. In particular it deals /ith '2 The exclusion from UC of persons subject to i11i"ration control 02 The presence condition 32 Absences from <= Overview of the Rules C',,0 C1 # +ith some exceptions people (called ;persons subject to i11i"ration control” 2.6ICs33 /ho require leave to enter the UE but do not have it (or /ho have certain t0pes of conditional leave) are excluded from UC b0 the I11i"ration Act1. Ever0one else has to satisf0 the basic condition that the0 be ;in <=”.
    [Show full text]
  • Treaty Series Recueil Des Traitis
    Treaty Series Treaties and internationalagreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariatof the United Nations Recueil des Traitis Traitis et accords internationaux enregistris ou classjs et inscrits au re'pertoire au Secritariatde l'Organisationdes Nations Unies Copyright © United Nations 2000 All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America Copyright © Nations Unies 2000 Tous droits rdserv6s Imprimd aux Etats-Unis d'Am6rique Treaty Series Treaties and internationalagreements registered orfiled and recorded with the Secretariatof the United Nations VOLUME 1774 Recueil des Traitis Traitjs et accords internationaux enregistris ou classes et inscrits au ripertoire au Secritariatde l'Organisationdes Nations Unies United Nations e Nations Unies New York, 2000 Treaties and internationalagreements registeredor filed and recorded with the Secretariatof the United Nations VOLUME 1774 1994 I. Nos. 30881-30919 TABLE OF CONTENTS I Treaties and internationalagreements registeredfrom 1 April 1994 to-21-A-ril 1994 Page No. 30881. United Nations and Syrian Arab Republic: Exchange of letters constituting an agreement concerning arrangements for the United Nations Workshop on the use of space techniques for monitoring and control of desert environment, held in Damascus from 14 to 18 November 1993. New York, 2 July and 1 September 1993 ...................................................... 3 No. 30882. Spain and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Exchange of notes constituting an agreement to derogate from certain provisions of The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduc- tion. M adrid, 22 July 1991 ......................................................................................... 5 No. 30883. Spain and Chile: Agreement on the reciprocal protection and promotion of investments (with pro- tocol). Signed at Santiago on 2 October 1991 ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Identity Documents Act1
    Issuer: Riigikogu Type: act In force from: 01.01.2021 In force until: 14.07.2021 Translation published: 28.12.2020 Identity Documents Act1 Passed 15.02.1999 RT I 1999, 25, 365 Entry into force 01.01.2000 Amended by the following acts Passed Published Entry into force 08.03.2000 RT I 2000, 26, 150 15.12.2000 21.03.2000 RT I 2000, 25, 148 29.03.2000 17.05.2000 RT I 2000, 40, 254 01.08.2000 08.11.2000 RT I 2000, 86, 550 02.12.2000 17.01.2001 RT I 2001, 16, 68 16.02.2001 07.03.2001 RT I 2001, 31, 173 07.04.2001 12.06.2001 RT I 2001, 56, 338 07.07.2001 19.06.2002 RT I 2002, 61, 375 01.08.2002 19.06.2002 RT I 2002, 63, 387 01.09.2002 15.10.2002 RT I 2002, 90, 516 01.12.2002 15.01.2003 RT I 2003, 13, 65 01.05.2003 22.01.2003 RT I 2003, 15, 87 27.02.2003 03.12.2003 RT I 2003, 78, 527 01.01.2004 17.12.2003 RT I 2004, 2, 4 16.01.2004 14.04.2004 RT I 2004, 28, 189 01.05.2004 14.12.2005 RT I 2006, 2, 3 01.07.2006 15.02.2006 RT I 2006, 12, 79 01.04.2006 17.05.2006 RT I 2006, 26, 191 01.08.2006 10.05.2006 RT I 2006, 26, 193 01.01.2007 07.06.2006 RT I 2006, 29, 221 28.08.2006, partially02.01.2007 14.11.2007 RT I 2007, 62, 394 Entry into force upon accession of Estonia to the European Union common visa space partially 21.12.2007 and partially 30.03.2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Obstacles to the Right of Free Movement of EU Citizens
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT C: CITIZENS' RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS PETITIONS Obstacles to the right of free movement and residence for EU citizens and their families Comparative Analysis STUDY Abstract This study, commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the LIBE and PETI Committees, presents a synthesis of in-depth studies in nine Member States in addition to broader EU and national research. Based on an analysis of selected provisions of Directive 2004/38/EC in Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Poland, Spain, Sweden and the UK, it identifies the main persisting barriers to free movement for EU citizens and their family members. The study also examines discriminatory restrictions to free movement, measures to counter abuse of rights and refusals of entry and residence rights, in addition to expulsions. It finds that, ten years after the deadline for transposition, there is general compliance, though some challenges remain. More systematic data collection, evaluation and guidance is thus required. The nine country studies are made available separately. PE 571.375 EN ABOUT THE PUBLICATION This research paper was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and Committee on Petitions and was commissioned, supervised and published by the Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs. Policy departments provide independent expertise, both in-house and externally, to support European Parliament committees and other parliamentary bodies in shaping legislation and exercising democratic scrutiny over EU external and internal policies.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on the Situation of Roma Migrants in France
    2009 2010 REPORT On the Situation of Roma Migrants in France © David Delaporte [slogans on demonstrators' placards in photograph] Stop transitional measures The right to work for ALL Europeans Romeurope National Human Rights Collective September 2010 Collectif National Droits de l’Homme Romeurope (Romeurope National Human Rights Collective) ABCR (Association Biterroise Contre le Racisme) (The Béziers Association Against Racism) – ALPIL (Action pour l’insertion sociale par le logement) (Action for Social Integration Through Housing) – AMPIL (Action Méditerranéenne Pour l’Insertion sociale par le Logement) (Mediterranean Action for Social Integration Through Housing) – ASAV (Association pour l’accueil des voyageurs) (Association to Welcome Travellers) – ASET (Aide à la scolarisation des enfants tsiganes) (Educational Assistance for Gypsy Children) – ASEFRR(Association de Solidarité en Essonne avec Les familles roumaines et rroms) (Essonne Association for Solidarity with Romanian and Rroma Families) – Association Solidarité Roms de Saint-Etienne (Roma Solidarity Association of Saint-Etienne) – CAM (Comité d‘Aide Médicale) (Medical Assistance Committee) – CCFD (Comité Catholique contre la Faim et pour le Développement) (Catholic Committee against Hunger and for Development) – CIMADE (Comité intermouvements auprès des évacués) (Intermovement Committee for Evacuees) – CLASSES (Collectif Lyonnais pour l’Accès à la Scolarisation et le Soutien des Enfants - des Squat) (Lyonnais Collective for School Enrolment Access and Support for Children of
    [Show full text]
  • EUDO Citizenship Observatory
    EUDO CITIZENSHIP OBSERVATORY ACCESS TO ELECTORAL RIGHTS ESTONIA Marja-Liisa Laatsit September 2013 CITIZENSHIP http://eudo-citizenship.eu European University Institute, Florence Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies EUDO Citizenship Observatory Access to Electoral Rights Estonia Marja-Liisa Laatsit September 2013 EUDO Citizenship Observatory Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Access to Electoral Rights Report, RSCAS/EUDO-CIT-ER 2013/24 Badia Fiesolana, San Domenico di Fiesole (FI), Italy © Marja-Liisa Laatsit This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the authors. Requests should be addressed to [email protected] The views expressed in this publication cannot in any circumstances be regarded as the official position of the European Union Published in Italy European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy www.eui.eu/RSCAS/Publications/ www.eui.eu cadmus.eui.eu Research for the EUDO Citizenship Observatory Country Reports has been jointly supported, at various times, by the European Commission grant agreements JLS/2007/IP/CA/009 EUCITAC and HOME/2010/EIFX/CA/1774 ACIT, by the European Parliament and by the British Academy Research Project CITMODES (both projects co-directed by the EUI and the University of Edinburgh). The financial support from these projects is gratefully acknowledged. For information about the project please visit the project website at http://eudo-citizenship.eu Access to Electoral Rights Estonia Marja-Liisa Laatsit 1. Introduction The landscape of electoral rights in Estonia is strongly influenced by the country’s large ethnic Russian minority.
    [Show full text]