The Constitutionalists and the 1924 General Election – a New Party Or a Worthless Coupon?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Constitutionalists and the 1924 General Election – a New Party Or a Worthless Coupon? A FORGOTTEN LIBERal–CONSERVATIVE AlliancE ThE COnsTITUTIOnalisTS and THE 1924 GENERal ElECTION – A NEW PARTY OR A WORThlEss COUPON? Collaboration between Liberals and Conservatives in British politics is not new. Some past arrangements, such as the Lloyd George Coalition, or the National Government of 1931, have been well researched, while others, including the Constitutionalists, have barely received any attention. Whilst it is fairly well- known that Churchill labelled himself as a Constitutionalist at the 1924 general election, in an attempt to straddle the Liberal– Conservative divide, he was not the only candidate bearing the label. Alun Wyburn- Powell identifies the other candidates who also styled themselves Constitutionalists, and investigates their electoral records, their views and their objectives. 6 Journal of Liberal History 79 Summer 2013 A FORGOTTEN LIBERal–CONSERVATIVE AlliancE ThE COnsTITUTIOnalisTS and THE 1924 GENERal ElECTION – A NEW PARTY OR A WORThlEss COUPON? n analysing their perfor- 162 candidates faced a Conserva- to those of the Fusionists, and some mance at the 1924 election, it tive contender.1 of the groups’ membership over- Iis possible to draw conclusions By the following election, in lapped. Whilst the Fusionists had about the success of the Constitu- 1923, the political landscape was been more strategic in their long- tionalist experiment and its impact very different. Lloyd George and term ambition permanently to on the Liberal Party, placing it in Asquith were reconciled and the merge their branch of Liberalism the wider context of the Liberals’ Liberal Party was more or less reu- with the Conservatives, the Con- decline and, in doing so, to answer nited, in opposition to the Con- stitutionalists were more short- the question as to whether the Con- servatives’ plans for protection. The term and their focus was primarily stitutionalists were a putative new Liberals gained seats, winning 159, concerned with maximising their party, or simply a loose grouping against 191 for Labour and 258 for chances of victory at the 1924 elec- using a coupon for short-term elec- the Conservatives. The inconclu- tion, by avoiding a local Liberal– toral advantage. sive outcome of the election placed Conservative contest. the Liberals in the invidious posi- The first publicity for a putative tion of having to permit or deny Constitutionalist group appeared The Lloyd George Coalition Labour their first opportunity to in The Times in September 1920, and the 1920 attempt at fusion form a government. They allowed as a display advertisement invit- The closeness of the political rela- Labour a milestone nine-month ing readers to attend a confer- tionship between some Liberals term in office, much to the annoy- ence in London to ‘help to carry and Conservatives was such that ance of most Conservatives and out the preliminary organisation during the Lloyd George Coa- many right-leaning Liberals. For of the Constitutional Party’.2 It lition Government of 1916–22, many voters, and even some Liberal was placed in the name of Charles there were moves towards ‘fusion’ MPs, this suggested that the Lib- Higham, an export merchant, of the Coalition Liberals and the eral Party had become superfluous, who sat as the Coalition Conserva- Conservatives. However, these with the essential battle of ideas tive MP for Islington South from manoeuvres were not seen favour- raging between the Labour Party 1918 to 1922. No further public- ably throughout the parties and and the Conservatives. ity appeared and no new party the moves were blocked, even Between the ending of the emerged. The Constitutionalist within the Lloyd George Liberal fusion plans in 1920 and the 1924 label was used occasionally in the side of the alliance, in 1920. At the election, three former Liberal MPs early 1920s in local politics, notably following election in 1922, Lloyd – Hilton Philipson, Arthur Evans by the ruling Liberal–Conserva- George led a depleted band which and Walter Waring – defected to tive alliance in Bootle in 1920–21 stood for that election under the the Conservatives. Other Liber- and then by the local Conservatives name ‘National Liberal’, exposed als, in particular Winston Church- alone in 1922–23.3 to competition from Labour and, ill, continued to harbour hopes The term reappeared in national in some cases, also from Asquith- Winston for some form of alliance with the politics when George Jarrett, the ian Liberals. Hastily-made Churchill in Conservatives. It was against this one-armed former chief organiser arrangements for the National 1924, after his background that the Constitution- of the Lloyd George Coalition- Liberals to be spared Conservative election as alists emerged as an attempt at an supporting National Democratic opposition were only partly imple- Constitutionalist anti-socialist alliance. The aims of and Labour Party (NDP), described mented and 43 of Lloyd George’s MP for Epping the Constitutionalists were similar himself as a ‘constitutionalist’ in Journal of Liberal History 79 Summer 2013 7 A FORGOTTEN liBERal-CONSERVATIVE alliancE a letter to The Times. He stood in 1922 defeat at Dundee. In May 1923, in a more Conservative direction’.16 the 1922 election as the nominee he described himself in private The result turned Lloyd George’s of both the National Liberal and as ‘a Tory Democrat’.9 However, thinking away from his plans for an Conservative associations in Dart- the arrival of the general election alliance with the Labour govern- ford, winning the seat against both in December 1923 forced him to ment and towards a revival of a Lib- Labour and Asquithian Liberal abandon his oscillation over party eral–Conservative arrangement. opposition. At the following con- labels. He settled for the Liberal To Lloyd George, and many other test, in 1923, Jarrett wrote in his candidacy at West Leicester, where Liberals, the Abbey by-election election address: ‘A year ago you he hoped that he might be spared a result demonstrated the strength of honoured me by returning me … Conservative opponent, although Anti-Socialist Liberalism and, at without respect to party … Again I it was, as Roy Jenkins observed, the same time, the weakness of the stand as the Constitutional Candi- impossible to see why he should Liberal Party. This was a widely- date.’4 His name appeared on both have thought this ‘remotely likely.’10 drawn conclusion at the time but, the Liberal and Conservative Party His wife, Clementine, so often as pointed out by Chris Cook, official lists of candidates in 1923. more objective than her husband an erroneous one. Churchill had However, in a straight fight with When the about his career, advised Churchill: mainly attracted former Conserva- Labour, he was defeated. Jarrett ‘I am sure the old real Liberals will tive voters and the Liberal Party thus served only one year in Parlia- Westminster want you back but … do not give had hardly campaigned.17 Church- ment, from 1922 to 1923, but was them cause … for thinking that ill’s eve-of-poll speech had advo- the first to do so as a Constitution- Abbey by- you would like a new Tory Liberal cated a united Conservative party alist.5 He formally joined the Con- Coalition … if you were to lose a ‘with a Liberal wing’.18 servative Party in January 1924. election was seat … it would be better for you to Jarrett was a close associate of be beaten by a Tory (which would Algernon Moreing, who was first called in Feb- arouse Liberal sympathy) than by The 1924 cast of Constitutional elected for the East Yorkshire con- a Socialist’.11 Churchill lost West characters stituency of Buckrose as a Coalition ruary 1924, Leicester to Labour and, like Jarrett After the Westminster near-miss, Liberal in 1918. He was a strong and Moreing, he was very unsym- Churchill decided to improve his advocate of fusion in 1920.6 In 1922 Churchill pathetic towards the Liberal Party negotiating position by gathering Moreing changed constituencies when it supported Labour after the around him a Liberal group ready and was successful as the National was caught 1923 election. When he was asked to co-operate with the Conserva- Liberal candidate for Camborne. in February 1924 to stand again as tives; he envisaged that his follow- However, the 1923 election in this between par- a Liberal, Churchill replied that he ers would occupy the same position constituency illustrated that Lib- would not be willing to fight the as the Liberal Unionists had in eral reunion was less than total; the ties. He was Conservatives.12 On 26 February 1886. On 10 May 1924 Church- only two candidates in Camborne convinced 1924 the Glasgow Herald declared ill informed Baldwin that he was were both Liberals, Moreing’s that Churchill was preparing the organising a group of Liberal only challenger being the Asquith- that Baldwin way for his return to the Conserva- MPs who would be willing to co- ian Liberal, Leif Jones. Moreing’s tive Party.13 operate with the Conservatives – name also appeared on the official wanted him When the Westminster Abbey Churchill provisionally called them list of Conservative candidates. by-election was called in Febru- ‘Liberal–Conservatives’.19 He told Unresolved differences between returned, ary 1924, Churchill was caught Baldwin that there were at least the followers of Lloyd George and between parties. He was convinced twenty Labour seats which could Asquith in Camborne led to the and won- that Baldwin wanted him returned, be won by Liberals, and only Liber- nomination of the two Liberal can- and wondered if the local Con- als, if they were given Conservative didates and the so-called United dered if the servative association might adopt support.20 This helped Churchill Liberal Committee in London him as their candidate, despite the persuade Baldwin to try and find declared its neutrality between the local Con- fact that he was not even a mem- him a safe Conservative seat in or candidates, rather than risk fuelling ber of their party.14 But when the near London and, if possible, a seat the local split.
Recommended publications
  • Writing About Winston: Two Works Compared Victoria Valusek
    The Histories Volume 8 | Issue 1 Article 7 Writing About Winston: Two Works Compared Victoria Valusek Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/the_histories Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Valusek, Victoria () "Writing About Winston: Two Works Compared," The Histories: Vol. 8 : Iss. 1 , Article 7. Available at: https://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/the_histories/vol8/iss1/7 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Scholarship at La Salle University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The iH stories by an authorized editor of La Salle University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Histories, Volume 8, Number 1 36 V Writing about Winston: Two Works Compared By Victoria Valusek ‘10 History records the ebb and flow of the tide of human endeavor and whether there are lessons to be learned depends primarily upon two factors. The first is the honesty, accuracy, and integrity of the person recording. The second is the critical consideration/sensibility of the student. Geoffrey Best (Churchill: A Study in Greatness) and Paul Addison (Churchill: The Unexpected Hero) have chosen as their subject the life of one of the most prominent political leaders of the modem era. The “ebb and flow” described by both depict Churchill as not so much riding the tide, but, more or less, sloshing around in the surf and despite his efforts at self-destruction Winston Churchill (1874-1965) somehow manages to save himself from drowning - sometimes by sheer will-power, but most often by chance. The self-destruct mechanism both authors ascribe to Churchill is his egomania.
    [Show full text]
  • Recall of Mps
    House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee Recall of MPs First Report of Session 2012–13 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 21 June 2012 HC 373 [incorporating HC 1758-i-iv, Session 2010-12] Published on 28 June 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Political and Constitutional Reform Committee The Political and Constitutional Reform Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider political and constitutional reform. Current membership Mr Graham Allen MP (Labour, Nottingham North) (Chair) Mr Christopher Chope MP (Conservative, Christchurch) Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Sheila Gilmore MP (Labour, Edinburgh East) Andrew Griffiths MP (Conservative, Burton) Fabian Hamilton MP (Labour, Leeds North East) Simon Hart MP (Conservative, Camarthen West and South Pembrokeshire) Tristram Hunt MP (Labour, Stoke on Trent Central) Mrs Eleanor Laing MP (Conservative, Epping Forest) Mr Andrew Turner MP (Conservative, Isle of Wight) Stephen Williams MP (Liberal Democrat, Bristol West) Powers The Committee’s powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in Temporary Standing Order (Political and Constitutional Reform Committee). These are available on the Internet via http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmstords.htm. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/pcrc. A list of Reports of the Committee in the present Parliament is at the back of this volume.
    [Show full text]
  • 60 Autumn 2008.Pdf
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 60 / Autumn 2008 / £7.50 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y Centenary of the state pension Pat Thane The Old Age Pensions Act, 1908 Andrew Connell ‘The Strange Case of Mr Rigg’ Liberal victor in North Westmorland Report The Lib-Lab Pact David Steel, Tom McNally, Michael Steed ‘Why I Am A Liberal’ Kenneth O. Morgan The dynastic Liberalism of Michael and all the Foots Duncan Brack Campbell as Leader Interview with Menzies Campbell Liberal Democrat History Group 2 Journal of Liberal History 60 Autumn 2008 Journal of Liberal History Issue 60: Autumn 2008 The Journal of Liberal History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group. ISSN 1479-9642 The Old Age Pensions Act, 1908 4 Editor: Duncan Brack Pat Thane analyses the introduction and implementation of the first state Deputy Editor: Tom Kiehl pensions, brought in one hundred years ago. Biographies Editor: Robert Ingham Reviews Editor: Dr Eugenio Biagini Contributing Editors: Graham Lippiatt, Tony Little, Letters to the Editor 13 York Membery Pensions and the working class (Martin Pugh); Hastings facts (Patrick Jackson and Paul Hunt); The Master of Elibank (Sandy Waugh); Liberal thinkers (Barry Patrons Stocker) Dr Eugenio Biagini; Professor Michael Freeden; Professor John Vincent ‘The Strange Case of Mr Rigg’ 14 The surprise Liberal victor in North Westmorland in the 1900 election proved to Editorial Board be something of a surprise himself; by Andrew Connell Dr Malcolm Baines; Dr Roy Douglas; Dr Barry Doyle; Dr David Dutton; Professor David Gowland; Dr Richard Grayson; Dr Michael Hart; Peter Hellyer; Ian Hunter; Dr Report: Working with others – the Lib-Lab Pact 23 J.
    [Show full text]
  • DUMFRIESSHIRE and GALLOWAY NATURAL HISTORY and ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY
    TRANSACTIONS of the DUMFRIESSHIRE AND GALLOWAY NATURAL HISTORY and ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY LXXXVII VOLUME 87 2013 TRANSACTIONS of the DUMFRIESSHIRE AND GALLOWAY NATURAL HISTORY and ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY FOUNDED 20 NOVEMBER 1862 THIRD SERIES VOLUME 87 LXXXVII Editors: ELAINE KENNEDY FRANCIS TOOLIS JAMES FOSTER ISSN 0141-1292 2013 DUMFRIES Published by the Council of the Society Office-Bearers 2012-2013 and Fellows of the Society President Dr F. Toolis FSA Scot Vice Presidents Mrs C. Iglehart, Mr A. Pallister, Mr D. Rose and Mr L. Murray Fellows of the Society Mr A.D. Anderson, Mr J.H.D. Gair, Dr J.B. Wilson, Mr K.H. Dobie, Mrs E. Toolis, Dr D.F. Devereux and Mrs M. Williams Mr L.J. Masters and Mr R.H. McEwen — appointed under Rule 10 Hon. Secretary Mr J.L. Williams, Merkland, Kirkmahoe, Dumfries DG1 1SY Hon. Membership Secretary Miss H. Barrington, 30 Noblehill Avenue, Dumfries DG1 3HR Hon. Treasurer Mr M. Cook, Gowanfoot, Robertland, Amisfield, Dumfries DG1 3PB Hon. Librarian Mr R. Coleman, 2 Loreburn Park, Dumfries DG1 1LS Hon. Editors Mrs E. Kennedy, Nether Carruchan, Troqueer, Dumfries DG2 8LY Dr F. Toolis, 25 Dalbeattie Road, Dumfries DG2 7PF Dr J. Foster (Webmaster), 21 Maxwell Street, Dumfries DG2 7AP Hon. Syllabus Conveners Mrs J. Brann, Troston, New Abbey, Dumfries DG2 8EF Miss S. Ratchford, Tadorna, Hollands Farm Road, Caerlaverock, Dumfries DG1 4RS Hon. Curators Mrs J. Turner and Miss S. Ratchford Hon. Outings Organiser Mrs S. Honey Ordinary Members Mrs P.G. Williams, Mrs A. Weighill, Dr Jeanette Brock, Dr Jeremy Brock, Mr D. Scott, Mr J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservatives in British Government and the Search for a Social Policy 1918-1923
    71-22,488 HOGAN, Neil William, 1936- THE CONSERVATIVES IN BRITISH GOVERNMENT AND THE SEARCH FOR A SOCIAL POLICY 1918-1923. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1971 History, modern University Microfilms, A XEROX Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED THE CONSERVATIVES IN BRITISH GOVERNMENT AND THE SEARCH FOR A SOCIAL POLICY 1918-1923 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Neil William Hogan, B.S.S., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 1971 Approved by I AdvAdviser iser Department of History PREFACE I would like to acknowledge my thanks to Mr. Geoffrey D.M. Block, M.B.E. and Mrs. Critch of the Conservative Research Centre for the use of Conservative Party material; A.J.P. Taylor of the Beaverbrook Library for his encouragement and helpful suggestions and his efficient and courteous librarian, Mr. Iago. In addition, I wish to thank the staffs of the British Museum, Public Record Office, West Sussex Record Office, and the University of Birmingham Library for their aid. To my adviser, Professor Phillip P. Poirier, a special acknowledgement#for his suggestions and criticisms were always useful and wise. I also want to thank my mother who helped in the typing and most of all my wife, Janet, who typed and proofread the paper and gave so much encouragement in the whole project. VITA July 27, 1936 . Bom, Cleveland, Ohio 1958 .......... B.S.S., John Carroll University Cleveland, Ohio 1959 - 1965 .... U.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms. a XER0K Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    72-11430 BRADEN, James Allen, 1941- THE LIBERALS AS A THIRD PARTY IN BRITISH POLITICS, 1926-1931: A STUDY IN POLITICAL COMMUNICATION. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1971 History, modern University Microfilms. A XER0K Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan (^Copyright by James Allen Braden 1971 THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED THE LIBERALS AS A THIRD PARTY IN BRITISH POLITICS 1926-1931: A STUDY IN POLITICAL COMMUNICATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By James Allen Braden, B. S., M. A. * + * * The Ohio State University 1971 Approved by ment of History PLEASE NOTE: Some Pages haveIndistinct print. Filmed asreceived. UNIVERSITY MICROFILMS Sir, in Cambria are we born, and gentlemen: Further to boast were neither true nor modest, Unless I add we are honest. Belarius in Cymbeline. Act V, sc. v. PREFACE In 1927 Lloyd George became the recognized leader of the Liberal party with the stated aim of making it over into a viable third party. Time and again he averred that the Liberal mission was to hold the balance— as had Parnell's Irish Nationalists— between the two major parties in Parlia­ ment. Thus viewed in these terms the Liberal revival of the late 1920's must be accounted a success for at no time did the Liberals expect to supplant the Labour party as the party of the left. The subtitle reads: "A Study in Political Communi­ cation " because communications theory provided the starting point for this study. But communications theory is not im­ posed in any arbitrary fashion, for Lloyd George and his fol­ lowers were obsessed with exploiting modern methods of commu­ nications.
    [Show full text]
  • A Forgotten Lib–Con Alliance
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 79 / Summer 2013 / £6.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y A forgotten Lib–Con alliance Alun Wyburn-Powell The Constitutionalists and the 1924 election A new party or a worthless coupon? David Dutton ‘A nasty, deplorable little incident in our political life’ The Dumfries Standard, 1957 David Cloke David Lloyd George: the legacy Meeting report James Fargher The South African war and its effect on the Liberal alliance Kenneth O. Morgan The relevance of Henry Richard The ‘apostle of peace’ Liberal Democrat History Group 2 Journal of Liberal History 79 Summer 2013 Journal of Liberal History Issue 79: Summer 2013 The Journal of Liberal History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group. ISSN 1479-9642 Liberal history news 4 Editor: Duncan Brack Lloyd George commemorations; plaque to Lord john Russell; Gladstone statue Deputy Editor: Tom Kiehl unveiled in Seaforth Assistant Editor: Siobhan Vitelli Biographies Editor: Robert Ingham Reviews Editor: Dr Eugenio Biagini A forgotten Liberal–Conservative alliance 6 Contributing Editors: Graham Lippiatt, Tony Little, The Constitutionalists and the 1924 election – a new party or a worthless York Membery coupon? by Alun Wyburn-Powell Patrons Letters to the Editor 15 Dr Eugenio Biagini; Professor Michael Freeden; Honor Balfour (Michael Meadowcroft and Hugh Pagan) Professor John Vincent Editorial Board Liberal history quiz 2012 15 Dr Malcolm Baines; Dr Ian Cawood; Matt Cole; Dr Roy The answers (questions in issue 78) Douglas; Dr David Dutton; Prof. David Gowland; Prof. Richard Grayson; Dr Michael Hart; Peter Hellyer; Dr ‘A nasty, deplorable little incident in our political 16 Alison Holmes; Dr J.
    [Show full text]
  • Chris Church Matters the HOUSE in a PANDEMIC YEAR Christ Church Matters 45 a HILARY TERM 2021 |
    Section 45 Chris Church Matters THE HOUSE IN A PANDEMIC YEAR Christ Church Matters 45 a HILARY TERM 2021 | CCM Section Editorial To mark a year which none of us will forget, this special edition of Christ Church Chris Church Matters draws together reflections on the Covid-19 pandemic from across the Development Christ Church community. It explores its impact in a variety of disciplines – around and Alumni Office the UK and abroad – and considers how life has changed both for those living, Christ Church working, studying and researching in the House over the last year, and alumni Oxford OX1 1DP United Kingdom members across the globe. We, as a community, can feel proud of the ground- +44 (0)1865-286325 breaking global contribution that researchers at the University of Oxford have development.office made in response to this crisis. @chch.ox.ac.uk www.chch.ox.ac.uk We are grateful to our contributors for sharing their expertise, reflections, and personal experiences. We have only been able to include a selection of contributions here, although every submission will be archived, or, alternatively, may be used in the regular e-Matters newsletters. CCM is not intended as a record of news, but brings an eclectic mix of experiences and thoughts. The Annual Report, of course, is the House’s chronicle. As Members will appreciate, the last twelve months have been particularly challenging for those pursuing their studies at the House. The Covid-19 Student Support Fund offers alumni the opportunity to support current Members who are faced with unforeseen costs because of the pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • British Medical Journal
    - SUPPL1EM:ENT- TO THE BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL. LONDON: SATURDAY, JUNE 14TH, 1913. CONTENTS. NATIONRIL INSURRINeE. PAGE PAGEI Mational Insurance Act: STATE SICKNESS INSURANCE COMMITTEE ... ... 521 MEDICAL AID INSTITUTES .. ... ... ... 521 lOCAL MEDICAL COMMITTEES: SICKNESS CLAIMS AND MEDICAL CERTIFICATES ... ... 521 WAlINING RESOLUTIONS OF THE GENERAL MEDICAL COUNCIL 522 Barrow-in-Furness ... ... ... ... ... 523 CANVASSING AND TOUTING ... ... ... ... 522 \West Riding cf Yorkshire ... ... ... 524 THE POSITION IN SOUTH WALES ... 522 ... 524 Kingston-upon-u... ... IIEETINGS OF INSURANCE COMMITTEES ... ... 525 Cardiff O.. 524 INSURANCE NOTES ... ... 526 Cornwall ... ... ... 524 RIEPORTS OF LOCAL ACTION ... ... 527 Hampstead *.. ... ... ... 525 INSURANCE ACT IN PARLIAMENT ... ... 529 CORRESPONDENCE ... 530 ASSOeIATION INTELLIGEN@E, -ET@,. Meetings of Branches and Divisions ... ... ... 531 General Medical Council: THE EIGHTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING: Public Health Committge.-Students Registration Committee. T1E SECTIONS: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION *,* ... 539 -British Pharmacopoeia.-Results of Examinations.-Penal PATHOLOGICAL MUSEUM ... .-. ... ... 540 Cases.-Dental Disciplinary Cases.-Vote of Thanks ... 544 LIBRARY OF THE BRITISH MEDICAL ASSOCIATION.- HOSPITALS AND ASYLUMS ... ... ... ... 549 BDoKs ADDED BETWEEN OCTOBER AND DECEMBER. 1912, AND VACGANCIES AND APPOINTMENTS ... ... ... 550 BoOKS NEE'DED TO COMPLETE SE'RIES .. .. ... 541 ASSOCIATION NOTICES.-BRANCH AND DIVIsION MEETINGS TO BIRTHS. MARRIAGES. AND DEATHS ... ... ... 551 BE HELD ... ..
    [Show full text]
  • Russell-Autobiography.Pdf
    Autobiography ‘Witty, invigorating, marvellously candid and generous in spirit’ Times Literary Supplement Bertrand Russell Autobiography First published in 1975 by George Allen & Unwin Ltd, London First published in the Routledge Classics in 2010 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor and Francis Group, an informa business This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2009. To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk. © 2009 The Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation Ltd Introduction © 1998 Michael Foot All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data A catalog record for this book has been requested ISBN 0-203-86499-9 Master e-book ISBN ISBN10: 0–415–47373–X ISBN10: 0–203–86499–9 (ebk) ISBN13: 978–0–415–47373–6 ISBN13: 978–0–203–86499–9 (ebk) To Edith Through the long years I sought peace, I found ecstasy, I found anguish, I found madness, I found loneliness, I found the solitary pain that gnaws the heart, But peace I did not find.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX I the Carlton Club Meeting, 19 October 1922
    APPENDIX I The Carlton Club Meeting, 19 October 1922 This appendix lists the vote at the Carlton Club Meeting of all Conservative M.P.s It is based on a list in the Austen Chamber­ lain Papers (AC/33/2/92), and has been checked against public statements by the M.P.s of their votes at the meeting. In two cases the public statements disagreed with Chamberlain's list. They were Sir R. Greene (Hackney North) and C. Erskine-Bolst (Hackney South). Chamberlaine's list said that Greene supported the Coalition, while Erskine-Bolst opposed it. The two men indicated that they had the opposite opinion, and their votes may have been transposed in Chamberlain's list. The appendix gives information on the attitude of Conserva­ tive M.P.s towards the Coalition before the Carlton Club Meet­ ing, and it also lists some M.P.s who were present but who according to Chamberlain did not vote. R. R. James, using a different source, published a list of the M.P.s voting at the Carlton Club (Memoirs Of A Conservative, 130-3). He gave the total vote as 185 opponents of the Coalition, and 88 supporters, and he lists 184 opponents of the Coalition. M.P.s who were listed differently from Chamberlain's accounting were: H. C. Brown (Chamberlain, anti; James, absent) C. Carew (Chamberlain, absent; James, pro) G. L. Palmer (Chamberlain, absent; James, anti) H. Ratcliffe (Chamberlain, absent; James, pro) 222 THE FALL OF LLOYD GEORGE N. Raw (Chamberlain, absent; James, anti) R. G. Sharman-Crawford (Chamberlain, anti; James, absent) R.
    [Show full text]
  • Guardian Archive Boer War Catalogue Compiled by John Mccrory, March 2017. Archive Reference
    Guardian Archive Boer War Catalogue Compiled by John McCrory, March 2017. Archive Reference: GDN/122/116 Title: Letter from W.T. Stead to C.P. Scott Extent: 1 sheet Scope and Content: Letter from W.T. Stead (1849–1912), newspaper editor and spiritualist, asking Scott to consider the publication of an anti-war penny weekly in connection with the Manchester Guardian, entitled War against War in the Transvaal. Stead suggests inclusion of extracts from speeches by [John] Morley, politician and writer, [Leonard] Courtney, journalist and politician, and Scott, along with writings from Olive Schreiner, author and social theorist. He discusses possibility of war, believing a plain statement of facts will prevent an attack on the Transvaal. Date: 20 Sep 1899 Archive Reference: GDN/122/121 Title: Letter from W.T. Stead to C.P. Scott Extent: 1 sheet Scope and Content: Letter from W.T. Stead (1849–1912), newspaper editor and spiritualist, informing him that he has completed his pamphlet [against the Boer War] and will soon have 100,000 copies sent by mail. He advises Scott that this pamphlet does not necessarily supersede the idea of a weekly, anti-war paper. Date: 23 Sep 1899 Archive Reference: GDN/122/141 Title: Letter from Henry Du Pré Labouchere to C.P. Scott Extent: 1 sheet Scope and Content: Letter from Henry Du Pré Labouchere (1831–1912), journalist and politician, condemning the outbreak of hostilities in the Transvaal [Boer War] stating that an ultimatum was practically sent by [the British] to the Boers, and the conflict being a punitive expedition to avenge [Joseph] Chamberlain, politician.
    [Show full text]