DOCSLIB.ORG

MINIMAL MODEL THEORY of NUMERICAL KODAIRA DIMENSION ZERO Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Preliminaries 3 3. Log Minimal Model Prog

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MINIMAL MODEL THEORY of NUMERICAL KODAIRA DIMENSION ZERO Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Preliminaries 3 3. Log Minimal Model Prog MINIMAL MODEL THEORY OF NUMERICAL KODAIRA DIMENSION ZERO YOSHINORI GONGYO Abstract. We prove the existence of good minimal models of numerical Kodaira dimension 0. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Preliminaries 3 3. Log minimal model program with scaling 7 4. Zariski decomposition in the sense of Nakayama 9 5. Existence of minimal model in the case where º = 0 10 6. Abundance theorem in the case where º = 0 12 References 14 1. Introduction Throughout this paper, we work over C, the complex number ¯eld. We will make use of the standard notation and de¯nitions as in [KM] and [KMM]. The minimal model conjecture for smooth varieties is the following: Conjecture 1.1 (Minimal model conjecture). Let X be a smooth pro- jective variety. Then there exists a minimal model or a Mori ¯ber space of X. This conjecture is true in dimension 3 and 4 by Kawamata, Koll¶ar, Mori, Shokurov and Reid (cf. [KMM], [KM] and [Sho2]). In the case where KX is numerically equivalent to some e®ective divisor in dimen- sion 5, this conjecture is proved by Birkar (cf. [Bi1]). When X is of general type or KX is not pseudo-e®ective, Birkar, Cascini, Hacon Date: 2010/9/21, version 4.03. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classi¯cation. 14E30. Key words and phrases. minimal model, the abundance conjecture, numerical Kodaira dimension. 1 2 YOSHINORI GONGYO and McKernan prove Conjecture 1.1 for arbitrary dimension ([BCHM]). Moreover if X has maximal Albanese dimension, Conjecture 1.1 is true by [F2]. In this paper, among other things, we show Conjecture 1.1 in the case where º(KX ) = 0 (for the de¯nition of º, see De¯nition 2.6): Theorem 1.2. Let X be a smooth projective variety such that º(KX ) = 0. Then there exists a good minimal model Xm of X. In particular, » KXm Q 0: In fact, we construct log minimal models for divisorial log terminal pairs (Corollary 5.5). The key idea of this proof is to apply the Zariski decomposition in the sense of Nakayama for the log canonical divisor when the scale, in the log minimal model program with scaling, con- verges to zero. Moreover, from [G], we recover the abundance theorem for log canonical pairs in the case where º = 0 proved by [CKP] and [Ka]: Theorem 1.3 (=Theorem 6.1). Let X be a normal projective variety and ¢ an e®ective R-divisor. Suppose that (X; ¢) is a log canonial pair such that º(KX +¢) = 0. Then KX +¢ is abundant, i.e. º(KX +¢) = ·(KX + ¢). In the ¯rst time, Nakayama proved the above theorem for klt pairs in [N]. Siu also gave the analytic proof of Theorem 1.3 when X is smooth and ¢ = 0 (cf. [Siu]). The results of [CKP], [Ka] and [Siu] depend on [Sim] and [Bu]. In this paper, we show Theorem 1.3 by a di®erent way from [CKP], [Ka] and [Siu]. In our proof of Theorem 1.3, we do not need results of [Sim] and [Bu]. Our proof depends on [BCHM] and [G]. We summarize the contents of this paper. In Section 2, we de¯ne several base loci, the Kodaira dimension and the numerical Kodaira dimension, and collect some properties of these. In Section 3, we review a log minimal model program with scaling and works of Birkar{Cascini{ Hacon{McKernan. In Section 4, we introduce the Zariski decomposition in the sense of Nakayama and collect some properties of it. Section 5 is devoted to the proof of the existence of minimal models in the case where º = 0. In Section 6, we prove Theorem 1.3. Notation and De¯nition 1.4. Let K be the real number ¯eld R or the rational number ¯eld Q. We set K>0 = fx 2 Kjx > 0g. Let X be a normal variety and let ¢ be an e®ective K-divisor such that KX + ¢ is K-Cartier. Then we can de¯ne the discrepancy a(E; X; ¢) 2 K for every prime divisor E over X. If a(E; X; ¢) ¸ ¡1 (resp. > ¡1) for every E, then (X; ¢) is called log canonical (resp. kawamata log terminal). We sometimes abbreviate log canon- ical (resp. kawamata log terminal) to lc (resp. klt). MINIMAL MODEL THEORY IN THE CASE WHERE º = 0 3 Assume that (X; ¢) is log canonical. If E is a prime divisor over X such that a(E; X; ¢) = ¡1, then cX (E) is called a log canonical center (lc center, for short) of (X; ¢), where cX (E) is the closure of the image of E on X. For the basic properties of log canonical centers, see [F1, Section 9]. Let ¼ : X ! S be a projective morphism of normal quasi-projective varieties and D a Z-Cartier divisor on X. We set the complete linear system jD=Sj = fEjD »Z;S E ¸ 0g of D over S. The base locus of the linear system jD=Sj is denoted by BsjD=Sj. When S = Spec C, we denote simply jDj and BsjDj.P R r For an -Weil divisor D = j=1 djDj such that Dj is a prime divisor 6 6 p q Pfor every j and Di = Dj for i = j, we de¯neP the round-up D = r p q x y r x y j=1 dj Dj (resp. the round-down D = j=1 dj Dj), where for every real number x, pxq (resp. xxy) is the integer de¯ned by x · pxq < x + 1 (resp. x ¡ 1 < xxy · x). The fractional part fDg of D denotes D ¡ xDy. Acknowledgments. The author wishes to express his deep gratitude to Professor Osamu Fujino for various comments and discussions. He would like to thank his supervisor Professor Hiromichi Takagi for care- fully reading a preliminary version of this paper and valuable com- ments. He also wishes to thank Professor Caucher Birkar, Professor Daisuke Matsushita, Professor Noboru Nakayama and Professor Mihai P¸aunfor valuable comments. Moreover he would like to thank Pro- fessor Vyacheslav V. Shokurov for serious remarks about the Kodaira dimensions of R-divisors. He is partially supported by the Research Fel- lowships of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists. 2. Preliminaries De¯nition 2.1 (Classical Iitaka dimension, cf. [N, II, 3.2, De¯nition]). Let X be a normal projective variety and D an R-Cartier divisor on X. If jxmDyj= 6 ;, we put a dominant rational map ÁjxmDyj : X 99K Wm; with respect to the complete linear system of xmDy. We de¯ne the Classical Iitaka dimension ¶(D) of D as the following: ¶(D) = maxfdimWmg if H0(X; xmDy) =6 0 for some positive integer m or ¶(D) = ¡1 other- wise. 4 YOSHINORI GONGYO Lemma 2.2. Let Y be a normal projective variety, ' : Y ! X a projective birational morphism onto a normal projective variety, and let D be an R-Cartier divisor on X. Then it holds the following: (1) ¶('¤D) = ¶('¤D + E) for a '-exceptional e®ective R-divisor E, and (2) ¶('¤D) = ¶(D). Proof. (1) and (2) follows from [N, II, 3.11, Lemma]. ¤ The following is remarked by Shokurov: 0 0 Remark 2.3. In general, ¶(D) may not coincide with ¶(D ) if D »R D . For example, let X be the P1, P and Q closed points in X such that P =6 Q and a irrational number. Set D = a(P ¡ Q). Then ¶(D) = ¡1 in spite of the fact that D »R 0. However, fortunately, ¶(D) coincides with ¶(D0) if D and D0 are 0 e®ective divisors such that D »R D ([Ch, Corollary 2.1.4]). Hence it seems reasonable that we de¯ne the following as the Iitaka (Kodaira) dimension for R-divisors. De¯nition 2.4 (Invariant Iitaka dimension, [Ch, De¯nition 2.2.1], cf. [CS, Section 7]). Let X be a normal projective variety and D an R- Cartier divisor on X. We de¯ne the invariant Iitaka dimension ·(D) of D as the following: ·(D) = ¶(D0) 0 0 if there exists an e®ective divisor D such that D »R D or ·(D) = ¡1 otherwise. Let (X; ¢) be a log canonical. Then we call ·(KX + ¢) the log Kodaira dimension of (X; ¢). If ¢ = 0, we simply say ·(KX ) is the Kodaira dimension of X. Remark 2.5. We remark the following: (i) In [Ch, De¯nition 2.2.1], ·(¢) is denoted as I(¢). Moreover the above log Kodaira dimension coincides with the log Ko- daira dimension in [Ch, De¯nition 2.2.3] because ·(KX + ¢) = log ·(KY +¢Y ) for a log canonical pair (X; ¢) and a log resolution Y ! X ([Ch, Corollary 2.2.6 (2)]), and (ii) Let D be a Q-Cartier divisor such that there exists an e®ective 0 0 Q-divisor D such that D »Q D . Then ·(D) = ¶(D). MINIMAL MODEL THEORY IN THE CASE WHERE º = 0 5 De¯nition 2.6 (Numerical Iitaka dimension for smooth varieties). Let Y be a smooth projective variety, D an R-Cartier divisor and A a Cartier divisor on Y . We set ¡k 0 σ(D; A) = maxfk 2 Z¸0j lim sup m dimH (X; xmDy + A) > 0g m!1 if H0(X; xmDy + A) =6 0 for in¯nitely many m 2 N or σ(D; A) = ¡1 otherwise. We de¯ne º(D) = maxfσ(D; A)jA is a divisor on Y g: Lemma 2.7. Let Y be a smooth projective variety, ' : Y ! X a projective birational morphism onto a normal projective variety, and let D be an R-Cartier divisor on X.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Threefolds of Kodaira Dimension One Such That a Small Pluricanonical System Do Not Define the Iitaka fibration
    THREEFOLDS OF KODAIRA DIMENSION ONE HSIN-KU CHEN Abstract. We prove that for any smooth complex projective threefold of Kodaira di- mension one, the m-th pluricanonical map is birational to the Iitaka fibration for every m ≥ 5868 and divisible by 12. 1. Introduction By the result of Hacon-McKernan [14], Takayama [25] and Tsuji [26], it is known that for any positive integer n there exists an integer rn such that if X is an n-dimensional smooth complex projective variety of general type, then |rKX| defines a birational morphism for all r ≥ rn. It is conjectured in [14] that a similar phenomenon occurs for any projective variety of non-negative Kodaira dimension. That is, for any positive integer n there exists a constant sn such that, if X is an n-dimensional smooth projective variety of non-negative Kodaira dimension and s ≥ sn is sufficiently divisible, then the s-th pluricanonical map of X is birational to the Iitaka fibration. We list some known results related to this problem. In 1986, Kawamata [17] proved that there is an integer m0 such that for any terminal threefold X with Kodaira dimension zero, the m0-th plurigenera of X is non-zero. Later on, Morrison proved that one can 5 3 2 take m0 =2 × 3 × 5 × 7 × 11 × 13 × 17 × 19. See [21] for details. In 2000, Fujino and Mori [12] proved that if X is a smooth projective variety with Kodaira dimension one and F is a general fiber of the Iitaka fibration of X, then there exists a integer M, which depends on the dimension of X, the middle Betti number of some finite covering of F and the smallest integer so that the pluricanonical system of F is non-empty, such that the M-th pluricanonical map of X is birational to the Iitaka fibration.
    [Show full text]
  • MMP) Is One of the Cornerstones in the Clas- Sification Theory of Complex Projective Varieties
    MINIMAL MODELS FOR KÄHLER THREEFOLDS ANDREAS HÖRING AND THOMAS PETERNELL Abstract. Let X be a compact Kähler threefold that is not uniruled. We prove that X has a minimal model. 1. Introduction The minimal model program (MMP) is one of the cornerstones in the clas- sification theory of complex projective varieties. It is fully developed only in dimension 3, despite tremendous recent progress in higher dimensions, in particular by [BCHM10]. In the analytic Kähler situation the basic methods from the MMP, such as the base point free theorem, fail. Nevertheless it seems reasonable to expect that the main results should be true also in this more general context. The goal of this paper is to establish the minimal model program for Kähler threefolds X whose canonical bundle KX is pseudoeffective. To be more specific, we prove the following result: 1.1. Theorem. Let X be a normal Q-factorial compact Kähler threefold with at most terminal singularities. Suppose that KX is pseudoeffective or, equivalently, that X is not uniruled. Then X has a minimal model, i.e. there exists a MMP X 99K X′ such that KX′ is nef. In our context a complex space is said to be Q-factorial if every Weil ⊗m ∗∗ divisor is Q-Cartier and a multiple (KX ) of the canonical sheaf KX is locally free. If X is a projective threefold, Theorem 1.1 was estab- lished by the seminal work of Kawamata, Kollár, Mori, Reid and Shokurov [Mor79, Mor82, Rei83, Kaw84a, Kaw84b, Kol84, Sho85, Mor88, KM92]. Based on the deformation theory of rational curves on smooth threefolds [Kol91b, Kol96], Campana and the second-named author started to inves- tigate the existence of Mori contractions [CP97, Pet98, Pet01].
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2008.08852V2 [Math.AG] 15 Oct 2020 Assuming Theorem 2, We Conclude That M16 Cannot Be of General Type, Thus Es- Tablishing Theorem 1
    ON THE KODAIRA DIMENSION OF M16 GAVRIL FARKAS AND ALESSANDRO VERRA ABSTRACT. We prove that the moduli space of curves of genus 16 is not of general type. The problem of determining the nature of the moduli space Mg of stable curves of genus g has long been one of the key questions in the field, motivating important developments in moduli theory. Severi [Sev] observed that Mg is unirational for g ≤ 10, see [AC] for a modern presentation. Much later, in the celebrated series of papers [HM], [H], [EH], Harris, Mumford and Eisenbud showed that Mg is of general type for g ≥ 24. Very recently, it has been showed in [FJP] that both M22 and M23 are of general type. On the other hand, due to work of Sernesi [Ser], Chang-Ran [CR1], [CR2] and Verra [Ve] it is known that Mg is unirational also for 11 ≤ g ≤ 14. Finally, Bruno and Verra [BV] proved that M15 is rationally connected. Our result is the following: Theorem 1. The moduli space M16 of stable curves of genus 16 is not of general type. A few comments are in order. The main result of [CR3] claims that M16 is unir- uled. It has been however recently pointed out by Tseng [Ts] that the key calculation in [CR3] contains a fatal error, which genuinely reopens this problem (after 28 years)! Before explaining our strategy of proving Theorem 1, recall the standard notation ∆0;:::; ∆ g for the irreducible boundary divisors on Mg, see [HM]. Here ∆0 denotes b 2 c the closure in Mg of the locus of irreducible 1-nodal curves of arithmetic genus g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kodaira Dimension of Siegel Modular Varieties of Genus 3 Or Higher
    The Kodaira dimension of Siegel modular varieties of genus 3 or higher Vom Fachbereich Mathematik der Universitat¨ Hannover zur Erlangung des Grades Doktor der Naturwissenschaften Dr. rer. nat. genehmigte Dissertation von Dipl.-Math. Eric Schellhammer geboren am 18. November 1973 in Stuttgart 2004 [email protected] Universitat¨ Hannover – Fachbereich Mathematik February 25, 2004 Referent: Prof. Dr. Klaus Hulek, Universitat¨ Hannover Koreferent: Prof. Dr. Herbert Lange, Universitat¨ Erlangen Tag der Promotion: 6. Februar 2004 2 Abstract An Abelian variety is a g-dimensional complex torus which is a projective variety. In order to obtain an embedding into projective space one has to chose an ample line bundle. To each such line bundle one can associate a polarisation which only depends on the class of the line bundle in the Neron-Se´ veri group. The type of the polarisation is given by a g-tuple of integers e1;::: ;eg with the property that ei ei+1 for i = 1;:::;g 1. j ei+1 − If e1 = = eg = 1, the polarisation is said to be principal. If the values are ··· ei pairwise coprime, the polarisation is said to be coprime. Furthermore, we can give a symplectic basis for the group of n-torsion points, which is then called a level-n structure. Not only Abelian varieties but also their moduli spaces have been of interest for many years. The moduli space of Abelian varieties with a fixed polarisation (and op- tionally a level-n structure for a fixed n) can be constructed from the Siegel upper half space by dividing out the action of the appropriate arithmetic symplectic group.
    [Show full text]
  • Kodaira Dimension in Low Dimensional Topology 3
    KODAIRA DIMENSION IN LOW DIMENSIONAL TOPOLOGY TIAN-JUN LI Abstract. This is a survey on the various notions of Kodaira dimen- sion in low dimensional topology. The focus is on progress after the 2006 survey [78]. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. κt and κs 2 2.1. The topological Kod dim κt for manifolds up to dimension 3 2 2.2. The symplectic Kod dim κs for 4−manifolds 4 2.3. Symplectic manifolds of dimension 6 and higher 6 3. Calculating κs 6 3.1. Additivity and subadditivity 6 3.2. Behavior under Surgeries 7 4. Main problems and progress in each class 8 4.1. Surfaces and symmetry of κ = −∞ manifolds 8 4.2. Towards the classification of κ = 0 manifolds 11 4.3. Euler number and decomposition of κs = 1 manifolds 15 4.4. Geography and exotic geography of κs = 2 manifolds 16 5. Extensions 17 5.1. Relative Kodaira dim for a symplectic pair 17 5.2. Symplectic manifolds with concave boundary 19 References 19 arXiv:1511.04831v1 [math.SG] 16 Nov 2015 1. Introduction Roughly speaking, a Kodaira dimension type invariant on a class of n−dimensional manifolds is a numerical invariant taking values in the fi- nite set n {−∞, 0, 1, · · · , ⌊ ⌋}, 2 where ⌊x⌋ is the largest integer bounded by x. Date: November 17, 2015. 1 2 TIAN-JUN LI The first invariant of this type is due to Kodaira ([64]) for smooth alge- braic varieties (naturally extended to complex manifolds): Suppose (M, J) is a complex manifold of real dimension 2m. The holomorphic Kodaira dimension κh(M, J) is defined as follows: −∞ if Pl(M, J) = 0 for all l ≥ 1, h κ (M, J)= 0 if Pl(M, J) ∈ {0, 1}, but 6≡ 0 for all l ≥ 1, k k if Pl(M, J) ∼ cl ; c> 0.
    [Show full text]
  • The Minimal Model Program for B-Log Canonical Divisors and Applications
    THE MINIMAL MODEL PROGRAM FOR B-LOG CANONICAL DIVISORS AND APPLICATIONS DANIEL CHAN, KENNETH CHAN, LOUIS DE THANHOFFER DE VOLCSEY,¨ COLIN INGALLS, KELLY JABBUSCH, SANDOR´ J KOVACS,´ RAJESH KULKARNI, BORIS LERNER, BASIL NANAYAKKARA, SHINNOSUKE OKAWA, AND MICHEL VAN DEN BERGH Abstract. We discuss the minimal model program for b-log varieties, which is a pair of a variety and a b-divisor, as a natural generalization of the minimal model program for ordinary log varieties. We show that the main theorems of the log MMP work in the setting of the b-log MMP. If we assume that the log MMP terminates, then so does the b- log MMP. Furthermore, the b-log MMP includes both the log MMP and the equivariant MMP as special cases. There are various interesting b-log varieties arising from different objects, including the Brauer pairs, or “non-commutative algebraic varieties which are finite over their centres”. The case of toric Brauer pairs is discussed in further detail. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Minimal model theory with boundary b-divisors 4 2.A. Recap on b-divisors 4 2.B. b-discrepancy 8 3. The Minimal Model Program for b-log varieties 11 3.A. Fundamental theorems for b-log varieties 13 4. Toroidal b-log varieties 15 4.A. Snc stratifications 15 4.B. Toric b-log varieties 17 4.C. Toroidal b-log varieties 19 5. Toric Brauer Classes 21 References 24 1. Introduction arXiv:1707.00834v2 [math.AG] 5 Jul 2017 Let k be an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero. Let K be a field, finitely generated over k.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Bounds for the Number of MMP-Series of a Smooth Threefold
    EFFECTIVE BOUNDS FOR THE NUMBER OF MMP-SERIES OF A SMOOTH THREEFOLD DILETTA MARTINELLI Abstract. We prove that the number of MMP-series of a smooth projective threefold of positive Kodaira dimension and of Picard number equal to three is at most two. 1. Introduction Establishing the existence of minimal models is one of the first steps towards the birational classification of smooth projective varieties. More- over, starting from dimension three, minimal models are known to be non-unique, leading to some natural questions such as: does a variety admit a finite number of minimal models? And if yes, can we fix some parameters to bound this number? We have to be specific in defining what we mean with minimal mod- els and how we count their number. A marked minimal model of a variety X is a pair (Y,φ), where φ: X 99K Y is a birational map and Y is a minimal model. The number of marked minimal models, up to isomorphism, for a variety of general type is finite [BCHM10, KM87]. When X is not of general type, this is no longer true, [Rei83, Example 6.8]. It is, however, conjectured that the number of minimal models up to isomorphism is always finite and the conjecture is known in the case of threefolds of positive Kodaira dimension [Kaw97]. In [MST16] it is proved that it is possible to bound the number of marked minimal models of a smooth variety of general type in terms of the canonical volume. Moreover, in dimension three Cascini and Tasin [CT18] bounded the volume using the Betti numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • [Math.DG] 27 Jun 2021 Kodaira Dimension & the Yamabe Problem, II
    Kodaira Dimension & the Yamabe Problem, II Michael Albanese and Claude LeBrun∗ June 27, 2021 Abstract For compact complex surfaces (M 4, J) of K¨ahler type, it was pre- viously shown [31] that the sign of the Yamabe invariant Y (M) only depends on the Kodaira dimension Kod(M, J). In this paper, we prove that this pattern in fact extends to all compact complex surfaces ex- cept those of class VII. In the process, we also reprove a result from [2] that explains why the exclusion of class VII is essential here. The Yamabe invariant Y (M) of a smooth compact n-manifold M is a dif- feomorphism invariant that largely captures the global behavior of the scalar curvature s = sg for all possible Riemannian metrics g on M. A cartoon ver- sion of the idea would be to just take the supremum of the scalar curvatures of all unit-volume constant-scalar-curvature metrics on M. However, in the precise definition of the invariant, one only considers those constant-scalar- curvature metrics that are Yamabe minimizers; this does not change the sign of the supremum, but it does in particular guarantee that it is always finite. Thus the Yamabe invariant of M is defined to be arXiv:2106.14333v1 [math.DG] 27 Jun 2021 s dµ Y M g g (M) := sup inf n−2 (1) γ g∈γ ´ n [ M dµg] ´ where dµg denotes the metric volume measure and γ varies over all conformal classes of Riemannian metrics g on M. With this convention, Y (M) > 0 iff M admits a metric of scalar curvature s > 0, whereas Y (M) 0 iff M admits a unit-volume metric of scalar curvature s> ǫ for every ǫ>≥ 0.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1905.05576V3 [Math.AG] 14 Apr 2020 Oti Okadterfrefrvlal Comments
    ON THE EXISTENCE OF MINIMAL MODELS FOR LOG CANONICAL PAIRS VLADIMIR LAZIC´ AND NIKOLAOS TSAKANIKAS Abstract. We show that minimal models of log canonical pairs exist, assuming the existence of minimal models of smooth varieties. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Preliminaries 4 3. On weak Zariski decompositions 16 4. Proofs of the main results 22 References 24 1. Introduction The goal of this paper is to reduce the problem of the existence of minimal models for log canonical pairs to the problem of the existence of minimal models for smooth varieties. The following is our main result. Theorem A. The existence of minimal models for smooth varieties of di- mension n implies the existence of minimal models for log canonical pairs of dimension n. Note that minimal models in the above theorem are relative minimal mo- dels, that is, minimal models of quasi-projective varieties or pairs which are arXiv:1905.05576v3 [math.AG] 14 Apr 2020 projective and whose canonical class is pseudoeffective over another normal quasi-projective variety. In this paper, minimal models are meant in the usual sense and not in the sense of Birkar-Shokurov; for the differences, see §2.2. We were supported by the DFG-Emmy-Noether-Nachwuchsgruppe “Gute Strukturen in der h¨oherdimensionalen birationalen Geometrie”. We would like to thank O. Fujino for pointing out a gap in a previous proof of Theorem 2.22 and for useful comments, S. Filipazzi, Y. Gongyo, J. Han, W. Liu, F. Meng and J. Moraga for useful discussions related to this work and the referee for valuable comments.
    [Show full text]
  • SINTESI DELLA TESI Enriques-Kodaira Classification Of
    Universit`adegli Studi Roma Tre Facolta` di Scienze Matematiche, Fisiche e Naturali Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Matematica SINTESI DELLA TESI Enriques-Kodaira classification of Complex Algebraic Surfaces Candidato Relatore Cristian Minoccheri Prof.ssa Lucia Caporaso Anno Accademico 2011-12 Sessione di Luglio 2012 Our principal aim is to describe and prove the classification of complex algebraic surfaces, a result due to the Italian school of Algebraic Geometry at the beginning of the XX century, and in particular to Enriques. This classification is done up to birational maps, but it is different from the classi- fication of curves. In fact, in the case of curves there is a unique nonsingular projective model for each equivalence class, whereas in the case of surfaces this model is not unique. Therefore we will need to deal with something dif- ferent: the minimal models. In fact, apart from the case of ruled surfaces (i.e. those birational to the product of a curve and the projective line), these are unique and allow us to obtain birationally equivalent surfaces by successive blow-ups. Thus the classification problem will split in two parts: ruled surfaces, which require special considerations, and non-ruled ones, for which it will suffice to classify minimal models. For this, we will need some birational invariants, which capture the geometric peculiarities of each class, as we will see. A first rough classification is achieved by means of Kodaira dimension, κ, which is defined as the largest dimension of the image of the surface in a projective space by the rational map determined by the linear system jnKj, or as −1 if jnKj = ? for every n.
    [Show full text]
  • Enriques–Kodaira Classification of Compact Complex Surfaces – an Analysis *Ramesha
    © 2018 JETIR December 2018, Volume 5, Issue 12 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) Enriques–Kodaira classification of compact complex surfaces – An Analysis *Ramesha. H.G. Asst Professor of Mathematics. Govt First Grade College, Tiptur. Abstract This paper attempts to study the Enriques–Kodaira classification a classification of compact complex surfaces into ten classes. the Enriques-Kodaira classification is a classification of compact complex surfaces. For complex projective surfaces it was done by Federigo Enriques, and Kunihiko Kodaira later extended it to non- algebraic compact surfaces. The classification of a collection of objects generally means that a list has been constructed with exactly one member from each isomorphism type among the objects, and that tools and techniques can effectively be used to identify any combinatorially given object with its unique representative in the list. Examples of mathematical objects which have been classified include the finite simple groups and 2- manifolds but not, for example, knots. A compact manifold is a manifold that is compact as a topological space. Examples are the circle (the only one-dimensional compact manifold) and the -dimensional sphere and torus. Compact manifolds in two dimensions are completely classified by their orientation and the number of holes (genus). It should be noted that the term "compact manifold" often implies "manifold without boundary," which is the sense in which it is used here. When there is need for a separate term, a compact boundaryless manifold is called a closed manifold. It has been established that for given n the n-dimensional compact, connected complex manifolds X can be classified according to their Kodaira dimension kod(X), which can assume the values -00,0,1, ..
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2105.04352V1 [Math.AG] 10 May 2021
    A NON-ARCHIMEDEAN ANALOGUE OF CAMPANA’S NOTION OF SPECIALNESS JACKSON S. MORROW AND GIOVANNI ROSSO ABSTRACT. Let K be an algebraically closed, complete, non-Archimedean valued field of charac- teristic zero, and let X be a K-analytic space (in the sense of Huber). In this work, we pursue a non-Archimedean characterization of Campana’s notion of specialness. We say X is K-analytically special if there exists a connected, finite type algebraic group G/K, a dense open subset U ⊂ Gan with codim(Gan \ U) > 2, and an analytic morphism U → X which is Zariski dense. With this definition, we prove several results which illustrate that this definition correctly captures Campana’s notion of specialness in the non-Archimedean setting. These results inspire us to make non-Archimedean counterparts to conjectures of Campana. As preparation for our proofs, we prove auxiliary results concerning the indeterminacy locus of a meromorphic mapping between K-analytic spaces, the notion of pseudo-K-analytically Brody hyperbolic, and extensions of meromorphic maps from smooth, irreducible K-analytic spaces to the analytification of a semi-abelian variety. 1. Introduction The study of rational points on varieties over number fields is one of the fundamental questions in arithmetic geometry. For curves, we have a good understanding of the behaviour of the rational points, and this behaviour is governed by the genus of the curve. If the curve has genus g 6 1, then the rational points on the curve become infinite after a finite extension of the base number field; in this case, we say the curve is arithmetically special.
    [Show full text]