Senate Likely to Hold Pre-Trial by Christina Mendez (The Philippine Star) Updated January 04, 2012 12:00 AM Comments (89) MANILA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Senate Likely to Hold Pre-Trial by Christina Mendez (The Philippine Star) Updated January 04, 2012 12:00 AM Comments (89) MANILA Senate likely to hold pre-trial By Christina Mendez (The Philippine Star) Updated January 04, 2012 12:00 AM Comments (89) MANILA, Philippines - The senator-judges in the impeachment trial of Chief Justice Renato Corona are considering a pre-trial conference so they can have an idea of the evidence as well as the number of witnesses to be presented. “We want a pre-trial so we can speed up the process and determine the evidence they will present,” Senate impeachment court spokesperson Maria Valentina Cruz said. She said the impeachment court would also have to decide on Corona’s request for a preliminary hearing ahead of the actual trial on Jan. 16. Cruz said the impeachment trial will start at 2 p.m. to allow the senator-judges to do legislative work in the morning. She also said only select TV networks will be allowed to set up cameras inside the plenary hall where the trial will be held. “There are some restrictions. The media cannot interview in the hallways and the plenary hall. Ambush interviews are not allowed. There will be two rooms in the Senate where media can conduct interviews,” she said. The Corona camp is seeking a preliminary hearing on its argument that the impeachment complaint is constitutionally infirm and defective because the 188 congressmen who signed it were unable to verify their signatures or prove that they had read and understand the articles of impeachment. The Chief Justice’s lawyers argued that verification is a constitutional requirement. But for members of the House prosecution panel, Corona was hiding behind a technicality in his pleading to avoid or delay his trial. “After all, there were boasts of his powerhouse legal team, that he is ready and willing to face trial in the Senate and welcomes the opportunity to prove his innocence,” the panel said in its 38-page reply to Corona’s answer to the Senate summons. The panel said it was Corona himself - in a speech delivered Dec. 14 at the SC - who declared his desire to face an impeachment court as soon as possible. “Apparently, now that the time has come for him to face the impeachment charges, he is not as bold after all,” the panel added. The panel also reminded Corona that the House of Representatives has the exclusive power to initiate impeachment and that the Senate has summoned him to face trial. “With these developments, it cannot be denied that the impeachment complaint is sufficient to proceed to trial. Any technical objections on the impeachment complaint are now barred and should no longer be entertained,” the reply read. The panel added that there is always a presumption of regularity in an impeachment complaint, including in the verification. “This presumption is not overcome by hearsay news reports that some congressmen supposedly failed to read the complaint, particularly in the absence of evidence that congressmen supposedly failed to read the impeachment complaint,” the prosecutors added. “Accountability is so crucial to democracy such that the Constitution has devoted an entire article to ‘Accountability of Public Offices’ (Article XI), and has devised the impeachment mechanism as a way to hold high officers accountable to the sovereign people,” it added. The House prosecutors also castigated Corona for declaring that the move to oust him is an attack on the entire judiciary. “For all this self-serving, grandiose, and arrogant claims, his impeachment is not an attack on the independence of the judiciary or the rule of law, or the system of checks and balances,” the reply read. The panel said the filing of the impeachment complaint was “purely a response to the people’s clamor to hold him accountable for his sins and offenses, and purge the Highest Court of a morally unfit officer who has betrayed their trust.” More legal challenge 1 Meanwhile, two more lawyers have asked the Supreme Court (SC) to declare the impeachment proceedings against Corona unconstitutional. Former assemblyman and Misamis Oriental Gov. Homobono Adaza and former President Joseph Estrada’s lawyer Alan Paguia jointly filed a 23-page petition to stop the impeachment proceedings amid calls for the SC not to intervene in the case. It was the fifth petition contesting the legality of the impeachment proceedings. Lawyer Vladimir Cabigao, tax informer Danilo Lihaylihay, former Integrated Bar of the Philippines president Vicente Millora and Marcos loyalist Oliver Lozano filed the previous petitions. Just like the previous petitioners, Adaza and Paguia argued that the impeachment complaint “has not been verified by the overwhelming majority of the complainants.” “Not having been verified, the so-called ‘verified complaint’ is a mere scrap of paper with no legal effect,” the petition of Adaza and Paguia read. They said the House violated due process and the equal protection clause under the Constitution when it swiftly adopted the eight Articles of Impeachment signed by 188 congressmen. The Senate, for its part, abused its discretion when it accepted the Articles of Impeachment despite the lack of verification, the two lawyers said. “In reality, the Senate has no legal basis for convening themselves into an impeachment jury. And to avoid making the issue moot and academic, we are asking the SC to stop or issue a TRO against the Senate from proceeding with the trial of the impeachment articles,” Paguia told reporters yesterday. In a related development, Millora also filed yesterday a motion asking the SC to deliberate on their request for a TRO on the impeachment proceedings. He said the SC should act swiftly lest the issue becomes moot once the Senate proceeds with the impeachment trial. The SC is set to discuss the petitions for TRO in full-court session on Jan. 17 or a day after the start of the impeachment trial at the Senate. As the impeachment trial nears, Corona’s supporters said they have high hopes of seeing him acquitted. “We are hoping the Chief Justice will be acquitted. His lawyers already submitted an answer where it was shown that not only the impeachment complaint was weak but also the process of filing the complaint,” SC spokesman Midas Marquez said in a press conference. Marquez said Corona’s lawyers led by retired SC justice Serafin Cuevas would also respond to the reply filed by the House prosecutors last Monday. “I think the Chief Justice is carefully studying the reply and he would answer it if required by the impeachment court,” he added. Marquez declined to provide details on the defense’s strategy, saying a “communications group” being organized would discuss the issue with the media. “It’s still being finalized. I understand the defense team and the prospective members of the communications group are meeting so it will be revealed as soon as it is finalized,” Marquez said. “A lot of issues will have to be explained while the impeachment process will take its normal course. The media will be asking so many questions, especially on the side of the Chief Justice, and that will be the main function of the communications group,” he added. - With Edu Punay Cases questioning constitutionality of Corona impeachment dismissible By Romulo Macalintal 3:05 am | Wednesday, January 4th, 2012 4share23 18 (Editor’s Note: Romulo Macalintal served as an election lawyer of former President and now Pampanga Rep. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, who is detained on charges of electoral sabotage in connection with the 2007 senatorial polls in Maguindanao.) Supreme Court Chief Justice Renato Corona. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO There will be no constitutional crisis or military takeover when the Supreme Court takes cognizance of the petitions filed by some lawyers questioning the constitutionality of the impeachment complaint against Chief Justice Renato Corona. For sure, the Supreme Court will not stop the Senate from acting as an impeachment court to try and decide the Corona impeachment case. 2 As a matter of fact, the high court may eventually dismiss these petitions for lack of jurisdiction and/or lack of legal standing of the lawyers in filing the cases. The issues raised in the petitions, such as defective verification and lack of proper grounds to impeach, are the very same defenses raised by Corona in his answer to the articles of impeachment the House of Representatives transmitted to the Senate last month. The Chief Justice asked the Senate “for the outright dismissal of the impeachment complaint or to enter a judgment of acquittal for all the articles of impeachment.” The 2003 impeachment case against then Chief Justice Hilario Davide Jr. in which the high court took cognizance and granted the petitions of some lawyers assailing the constitutionality of the impeachment case, cannot be applied to Corona’s case. In the Davide case, the impeachment complaint had not yet been received by the Senate when the petitions were filed in the Supreme Court. In Corona’s case, the articles of impeachment had already been received by the Senate and Corona had already filed his answer, thereby submitting himself to or recognizing the jurisdiction of the impeachment court. The Supreme Court may likewise dismiss the petitions for lack of legal standing of the petitioners because they have not suffered any form of direct or personal injury as a result of the filing of the impeachment complaint against Corona. Furthermore, the grounds relied upon by the House in impeaching Corona are political questions which the Supreme Court cannot review or overturn. Finally, the tribunal does not usually touch on the issue of the constitutionality of an act of Congress if there are some other grounds upon which the court may rest its judgment. As stated, the Senate had already received the articles of impeachment against Corona and convened as an impeachment court, and Corona had already submitted himself to the jurisdiction of the Senate.
Recommended publications
  • Duterte Wants Easier Declaration of Martial Law, Bypassing Congress
    WEEKLY ISSUE 70 CITIES IN 11 STATES ONLINE Vol. IX Issue 403 1028 Mission Street, 2/F, San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel. (415) 593-5955 or (650) 278-0692 [email protected] Dec. 29, 2016 - Jan. 4, 2017 PNP resolves killings Acquitted Raiders dominate Hollywood mourns Manigong Bagong Taon PH NEWS | A2 PH NEWS | A3 SPORTS NEWS | A5 ENTERTAINMENT | B7 ENTERTAINMENT | B8 New law sets caregivers’ Duterte wants easier declaration of rights, benefits & salaries By William Casis | Martial Law, bypassing Congress & SC FilAm Star Correspondent By Macon Araneta | FilAm Star Correspondent President Rodrigo Duterte said said. he wants the Constitution amended to Saying she is prepared to fight Mar- make it less difficult for any president to tial Law, Robredo noted that Filipinos declare Martial Law but Vice-president have demonstrated their courage to Leni Robredo said she is ready to fight stand up and make their voices be heard against its return. for the sake of protecting our freedom According to Duterte, he wants the and fighting for the truth. declaration of Martial Law to be the sole Robredo, who recently quit her prerogative of the president. He said this Cabinet post over differences with Du- would bypass the “inefficiency” of hav- terte and emerged as opposition leader, ing Congress and the Supreme Court to said the President’s reference to specific Bataan Rep. Geraldine Roman agree to the declaration. provisions in the 1987 Constitution (photo: www.filam.net) “If I declare Martial Law amid an providing controls on martial law as a The House committee on labor invasion or war, I cannot proceed on “reckless reaction” to the Marcos regime and employment approved House and on, especially if there is unrest.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Tenure and the Politics of Impeachment
    C International Journal for Court Administration International Association For copywriteart.pdf 1 12/20/17 8:30 AM Vol.CourtM Administration 9 No. 2, July 2018 ISSNY 2156-7964 URL: http://www.iacajournal.org CiteCM this as: DOI 10.18352/ijca.260 Copyright: MY CY JudicialCMY Tenure and the Politics of Impeachment - 1 ComparingK the United States and the Philippines David C. Steelman2 Abstract: On May 11, 2018, Maria Lourdes Sereno was removed from office as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines. She had been a vocal critic of controversial President Rodrigo Duterte, and he had labeled her as an “enemy.” While she was under legislative impeachment investigation, Duterte’s solicitor general filed aquo warranto petition in the Supreme Court to challenge her right to hold office. The Supreme Court responded to that petition by ordering her removal, which her supporters claimed was politically-motivated and possibly unconstitutional. The story of Chief Justice Sereno should give urgency to the need for us to consider the proposition that maintaining the rule of law can be difficult, and that attacks on judicial independence can pose a grave threat to democracy. The article presented here considers the impeachment of Chief Justice David Brock in the American state of New Hampshire in 2000, identifying the most significant institutional causes and consequences of an event that presented a crisis for the judiciary and the state. It offers a case study for the readers of this journal to reflect not only on the removal of Chief Justice Sereno, but also on the kinds of constitutional issues, such as judicial independence, judicial accountability, and separation of powers in any democracy, as arising from in conflicts between the judiciary and another branch of government.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Rhetoric and Reality: the Progress of Reforms Under the Benigno S. Aquino Administration
    Acknowledgement I would like to extend my deepest gratitude, first, to the Institute of Developing Economies-JETRO, for having given me six months from September, 2011 to review, reflect and record my findings on the concern of the study. IDE-JETRO has been a most ideal site for this endeavor and I express my thanks for Executive Vice President Toyojiro Maruya and the Director of the International Exchange and Training Department, Mr. Hiroshi Sato. At IDE, I had many opportunities to exchange views as well as pleasantries with my counterpart, Takeshi Kawanaka. I thank Dr. Kawanaka for the constant support throughout the duration of my fellowship. My stay in IDE has also been facilitated by the continuous assistance of the “dynamic duo” of Takao Tsuneishi and Kenji Murasaki. The level of responsiveness of these two, from the days when we were corresponding before my arrival in Japan to the last days of my stay in IDE, is beyond compare. I have also had the opportunity to build friendships with IDE Researchers, from Nobuhiro Aizawa who I met in another part of the world two in 2009, to Izumi Chibana, one of three people that I could talk to in Filipino, the other two being Takeshi and IDE Researcher, Velle Atienza. Maraming salamat sa inyo! I have also enjoyed the company of a number of other IDE researchers within or beyond the confines of the Institute—Khoo Boo Teik, Kaoru Murakami, Hiroshi Kuwamori, and Sanae Suzuki. I have been privilege to meet researchers from other disciplines or area studies, Masashi Nakamura, Kozo Kunimune, Tatsufumi Yamagata, Yasushi Hazama, Housan Darwisha, Shozo Sakata, Tomohiro Machikita, Kenmei Tsubota, Ryoichi Hisasue, Hitoshi Suzuki, Shinichi Shigetomi, and Tsuruyo Funatsu.
    [Show full text]
  • 08 Patricio.Indd 293 4/21/08 11:00:48 AM 294 Patricio N
    The Philippines: Weak State, Resilient President Patricio N. Abinales Southeast Asian Affairs, Volume 2008, pp. 293-312 (Article) Published by Institute of Southeast Asian Studies DOI: 10.1353/saa.0.0007 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/saa/summary/v2008/2008.abinales.html Access Provided by Northeastern University Libraries at 05/22/10 4:38PM GMT Southeast Asian Affairs 2008 THE PHILIPPINES Weak State, Resilient President Patricio N. Abinales Shortly after government forces tear-gassed their way into one of Manila’s finest hotels on 29 November 2007 to flush out thirty-odd “rebels” and their civilian supporters, Philippine-focussed e-groups began debating the significance of what became known as the “Makati stand-off”.1 Among the most popular messages was a joke patterned after American late-night host David Letterman’s “Top Ten List”. Purporting to be an “Intel Info” released by the government’s National Intelligence Security Agency, it lists the “Top Ten Reasons Why [Navy Lieutenant Second Grade and Senator Antonio] Trillanes and Company Packed Up” and surrendered: 1. Not even his mother joined them. 2. Oakwood [the plush apartment complex Trillanes and comrades took over in an aborted 2004 coup] had a better lobby. 3. CNN was not there to cover it. 4. The hotel had run out of ice cubes. 5. The APCs [armed personnel carriers] were parked in the lobby, not in the parking lot. 6. Trillanes realized that being tear-gassed was not part of his mandate as senator. 7. [Former Vice-President Teofisto] Guingona [a civilian participant] thought it was an anti-Erap [former President Joseph Estrada], or pro-Erap pardon rally, whatever… 8.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism
    Social Ethics Society Journal of Applied Philosophy Special Issue, December 2018, pp. 181-206 The Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (PCIJ) and ABS-CBN through the Prisms of Herman and Chomsky’s “Propaganda Model”: Duterte’s Tirade against the Media and vice versa Menelito P. Mansueto Colegio de San Juan de Letran [email protected] Jeresa May C. Ochave Ateneo de Davao University [email protected] Abstract This paper is an attempt to localize Herman and Chomsky’s analysis of the commercial media and use this concept to fit in the Philippine media climate. Through the propaganda model, they introduced the five interrelated media filters which made possible the “manufacture of consent.” By consent, Herman and Chomsky meant that the mass communication media can be a powerful tool to manufacture ideology and to influence a wider public to believe in a capitalistic propaganda. Thus, they call their theory the “propaganda model” referring to the capitalist media structure and its underlying political function. Herman and Chomsky’s analysis has been centered upon the US media, however, they also believed that the model is also true in other parts of the world as the media conglomeration is also found all around the globe. In the Philippines, media conglomeration is not an alien concept especially in the presence of a giant media outlet, such as, ABS-CBN. In this essay, the authors claim that the propaganda model is also observed even in the less obvious corporate media in the country, disguised as an independent media entity but like a chameleon, it © 2018 Menelito P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Celebrity's Right to Autonomous Self-Definition
    65 THE CELEBRITY’S RIGHT TO AUTONOMOUS SELF-DEFINITION AND FALSE ENDORSEMENTS: ARGUING THE CASE FOR A RIGHT OF PUBLICITY IN THE PHILIPPINES Arvin Kristopher A Razon* Abstract With the Philippines being the top country in terms of social media usage, social media platforms have expanded opportunities for celebrities to profit from their fame. Despite the pervasiveness of celebrity culture in the country and the increasing number of unauthorised celebrity advertisements in such platforms, the right of publicity does not explicitly exist in Philippine law. This paper explains that the lack of an explicit statute-based right of publicity does not mean that it does not exist in common law or other statutory law. Centred on the minimalist path of law reform, the paper argues that the existing right to privacy in Philippine law can justify a right to publicity, anchored on the right to protect unwarranted publicity about oneself regardless of one’s status in the public eye, as well as on the right to autonomous self-definition. The illustrative cases in this paper evidence the hurt feelings celebrities suffer from unwanted publicity. A publicity right also exists as a property right under local intellectual property laws on unfair competition. I. Introduction The opportunity to economically exploit one’s name, likeness or identity, often through celebrity endorsements, is a perk that comes with being a celebrity.1 The internet, particularly social media platforms like Facebook and Instagram, has expanded the opportunities for celebrities to profit from their fame, providing them with another channel by which they can endorse brands to a global audience, * BA Organizational Communication (magna cum laude), Juris Doctor (University of the Philippines), LLM (University of Melbourne); Lecturer, De La Salle University.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of the Philippines
    Republic of the Philippines COMMISSION OF ELECTIONS OFFICE FOR OVERSEAS VOTING LIST OF VOTERS WHO FAILED TO VOTE FOR TWO CONSECUTIVE NATIONAL ELECTIONS (2013 AND 2016 ELECTIONS) KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA / JEDDAH Seq. Form ID No. Name Registration date 1. 6080020130225661 ABABAT, GIOVANNI INDOC 09/14/2012 2. 6080020130035402 ABABOL, ROSELO BAGUIO 05/14/2012 3. 6823600500001276 ABAD, ALEXANDER SAGARIO 11/07/2003 4. 6080020130031387 ABAD, ALEXIS MANTALABA 04/13/2012 5. 6080020130213207 ABAD, ARMANDO ORDONIO 10/30/2012 6. 6080020130087235 ABAD, BRIAN CAPULE 05/25/2012 7. 6080020130140994 ABAD, EDWARD ANTONIO 06/27/2012 8. 6080025013014029 ABAD, EDWIN BERNARDO 08/30/2012 9. 6080020130022713 ABAD, HILARIO BILOG 04/25/2012 10. 6080020130135975 ABAD, MARY CRIS MARCELINO 07/25/2012 11. 6823610700000907 ABAD, PACITA ELLOSO 08/07/2009 12. 6080020130096017 ABAD, PERLA LABAYANI 07/16/2012 13. 6080020130047390 ABAD, ROSELYN QUIENES 06/13/2012 14. 6823600500001278 ABAD, ROSIE CANTARA 11/07/2003 15. 6080020130083799 ABAD, SALVADOR ANTON 05/04/2012 16. 6080020130132363 ABADIANO, EDDERICO SABROSO 06/28/2012 17. 6823600400000531 ABADICIO, ANTONIO LAVARES 11/21/2003 18. 6080020130227753 ABADIES, MYLENE LOMENTIGAR 09/29/2012 19. 6080020130105504 ABADILLA, ARKE OFELIA BALABA 08/28/2012 20. 6080020130189932 ABAGAT, MARIBEL LOPEZ 08/24/2012 21. 6823600400002883 ABAIGAR, EFREN DESIDERIO 12/01/2003 22. 6080020130089082 ABAIGAR, JOVITO CABURNAY 06/07/2012 23. 6080020130094212 ABAIN, FATMARAISA AWIS 07/09/2012 24. 6823610700000477 ABALLE, JOEY YU 07/19/2009 25. 6080020130031418 ABALORIO, BHERN PHILLIP AMARILLENTO 04/13/2012 26. 6080020130180802 ABALOS, DYAN KARLA VALDEZ 10/05/2012 27. 6823600700002975 ABALOS, RHANDY MANLAGÑIT 12/10/2003 28.
    [Show full text]
  • In Re the Impeachment
    In Re Impeachment of Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo President, Republic of the Philippines, Respondent. X_____________________X AMENDED COMPLAINT Prefatory Statement Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.1 Public office is a public trust. Public officers and employees must at all times be accountable to the people, serve them with utmost responsibility, integrity, loyalty, and efficiency, act with patriotism and justice, and lead modest lives.2 …A well-constituted court for the trial of impeachments is an object not more to be desired than difficult to be obtained in a government wholly- elective. The subjects of its jurisdiction are those which proceeded from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust….What, it may be asked, is the true spirit of the institution itself? Is it not designed as a method of NATIONAL INQUEST into the conduct of public men? If this be the design of it, who can so properly be the inquisitors for the nation as the representatives of the nation themselves?...3 t stake in this proceeding for the impeachment of Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, President of the Philippines, is the Aintegrity of the Office of the President, upon which is laid that great burden embodied in the high constitutional principle that a 1 PROVERBS 14: 34 (KJV) 2CONST. art. XI § 1. 3THE FEDERALIST No. 65, at 396-397 (Alexander Hamilton), (Clinton Rossiter ed., 1961) (1788) [capitalization in the original] 1 public office is a public trust. In this proceeding, to expose the criminality, illegality and unconstitutionality of the conduct in office of the Chief Executive - the highest official of the land - is to uphold the Constitution, the Rule of Law, and the accountability of the President to the Filipino People, the true Sovereign of the Republic of the Philippines.
    [Show full text]
  • News Monitoring 07 10 2019
    DATE 10 JUL 2019 DAY : pednescial EN- TsTE,WS _ Strategic Communication and Initiative Service III-11111F • rx.....-rAGE 1 DANNER EMFORIM CARR /.-Lbfroi00.011_ ' MORY MORY MOO - • • - MGR t WIM 10 JUL 7019 epartment of Environment sod Witte el Resources MANILAtIVIALETIN RATEGIC COMMUNICATION INITIATIVES SERVICE THE NA.TION'S LEAPING NEWSPAPER GAM DENR reopens dump in Baguio By ZALDY COMANDA local government, Rapport Innova- tions, to speed up the upgrading of the BAGUIO CITY - The Department machines. of Environment and Natural Resources Last June 26, Undersecretary (DENR) in Cordillera granted the request Benny Anteporda issued a temporary of the city to reopen the Irisan dumpsite order stopping Baguio from operating to head off another garbage crisis. the ERS machines because of alleged DENR-Cordillera Regional Direc- environmental violations. tor Ralph Pablo informed Mayor Ben- Among the other conditions for lift- jie Magalong that the agency decided ing the order are the proper collection to reopen the facility on condition the of biodegradable waste and the con- city collect the mixed waste that was version of the area into an eco-friendly piling up by the end of the month. park by December 31. The city must also see to it that the Magalong said the over 40,000 two Environmental Recycling System cubic meters of raw compost in the (ERS) machines for converting biode- dump must be converted into com- gradable waste will be operational by post fertilizer by the third quarter of that time. next year so that converting the dump During a meeting at the dump, into a park could be finished by the Magalong directed the partner of the first quarter of 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Couegeof Law, Univerbity of the Philippines the President Univ
    THE DEAN'S REPORT, 1963·64 CoUege of Law, UniverBity of the Philippines The President Univ,ersityof the Philippines Diliman, QuezonCity Sir: I have to submit the following report on the operation and ac- tivities of the Collegeof Law for the academic year 1963-1964. I ,THE U.P. LAW CENTER: OPPORTUNITY AND CHALLENGE Speaking in 1925 at the dedication ceremonies of the Lawyers Club of the University of Michigan Law School-the law school which gave us our beloved founder and first dean, the late Justice George A. Malcolm-J ames Parker Hall, then Dean of the Univer- sity of Chicago Law Schoolstated:1 "A change is taking place in the conception of the proper function of a University law school. Until very late7iy it was conceived aMno8t whoUy laB a high-grade prOfessional, traimimg school, employingit was true, scholarly methods and exacting standards of study and achievement, but only indirectly seeking to improve the substance and administration of our law. The law, it was assured, was what the courts and legislatures made it, and the task of the law school was to analyze, comprehend,and classify this product, and to pass on to students a similar power of ana- lysis, comprehension,and classification, as regards at least the principal topics of the law, so as to enable them worthily and successfully to play their parts as judges and lawyers in the lists of future litigation." Dean Hall, how.ever,was quick to reassure his listeners-which undoubtedly included a group of law teachers-that this primary law schoolfunction of providing "high grade professional training," was unquestionably a worthy one; that, indeed, it should be prior to all others.
    [Show full text]
  • Meet Focuses on Building Bridges, Peace and Refugees
    BUSINESS | Page 1 SPORT | Page 8 Haroun ready for heavy schedule INDEX DOW JONES QE NYMEX QATAR 2-8, 24 COMMENT 22, 23 Qatar in a strong in double REGION 8, 9 BUSINESS 1-8, 14-16 position despite 22,331.35 8,278.76 49.92 ARAB WORLD 8, 9 CLASSIFIED 9-13 +63.01 -96.42 +0.03 INTERNATIONAL 10-21 SPORTS 1-8 3-month blockade gold bid +0.28% -1.15% +0.06% Latest Figures published in QATAR since 1978 TUESDAY Vol. XXXVIII No. 10581 September 19, 2017 Dhul-Hijja 28, 1438 AH GULF TIMES www. gulf-times.com 2 Riyals PM meets Pakistan ambassador Siege countries’ Emir to address allegations make UN General Assembly, meet no sense: FM By Matthew Wisner Trump today Fox Business is Highness the Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani he allegations that Qatar funds Hwill address the 72nd Ses- extremism make no fi nancial sion of the UN General Assembly Tsense, HE the Foreign Minister today. Sheikh Mohamed bin Abdulrahman al- His Highness the Emir is also Thani, yesterday said. scheduled to meet and hold talks In an interview with Fox Business, with US President Donald Trump on the minister said how was it possible the sidelines of the UN General As- HE the Prime Minister and Minister of Interior Sheikh Abdullah bin Nasser bin Khalifa al-Thani yesterday met Pakistan that Qatar would invest in the fi ght sembly meeting today. ambassador Shahzad Ahmad. Talks dealt with co-operation between Qatar and Pakistan and prospects of their development against terrorism and yet fund terrorist The Emir has arrived in the US in various fields, in addition to a number of topics of common concern.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 PROF. DR. DIANE A. DESIERTO (JSD, Yale) Associate Professor Of
    PROF. DR. DIANE A. DESIERTO (JSD, Yale) Associate Professor of Law (tenured) Michael J. Marks Distinguished Professor in Business Law, Co-Director, ASEAN Law & Integration Center (ALIC), William S. Richardson School of Law, University of Hawai’i at Manoa, Rm. 257, 2515 Dole Street, Honolulu, HI 96822-2350 Phone: (808) 956 0417 Fax: (808) 956 8313 Mobile: +1 (808) 285 5779 Website: https://www.law.hawaii.edu/person/diane-desierto Fellow, Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences (CASBS), Stanford University, 75 Alta Road, Stanford CA 94305 https://casbs.stanford.edu/diane-desierto, and Research Fellow, WSD Handa Center for Human Rights and International Justice, Stanford Global Studies Division, Stanford University, https://handacenter.stanford.edu/people/diane-desierto-research- fellow 2017 Director of Studies for Public International Law and Visiting Professor, Hague Academy of International Law Specializations: International Law and International Dispute Settlement, International Investment and Commercial Arbitration Law, International Economic Law (World Trade, International Finance, International Investment, Law & Development), International Maritime Security, ASEAN Law, IHL & IHR in ASEAN, Comparative Constitutional Law, Business Associations GLOBAL PROFESSIONAL and ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS: Member of the Scientific Advisory Board, European Journal of International Law Permanent Editor, EJIL:Talk! (official blog of the European Journal of IL) Academic Council Member, Institute of Transnational Arbitration (ITA) Co-Chair, Oxford
    [Show full text]