DOCSLIB.ORG

Unit 2 Revision Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unit 2 Revision Guide UNIT 2 REVISION GUIDE 1. Constitution 2. Parliament 3. PM & Executive 4. Relations between the branches 1.Constitution revision guide 1.1 Nature and Development of the British Constitution: How the constitution developed: Magna Carta 1215 Create principle of rule of law, that everyone should be held accountable to law and order Bill of Rights 1689 Established the sovereignty of Parliament over the monarch Act of Settlement 1701 Established the monarch as the monarch of the United Kingdom Act of Union 1707 Abolished the Scottish Parliament and created the British Parliament Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949 Established the supremacy of the House of Commons meaning that the Lords could not block finance bills and could only delay bills by one year European Communities Act 1972 Brought the UK into the EU- EU law added to constitution. Notice of Withdrawal Act 2017 Will bring UK out of the EU Sources of the British Constitution: Statute Law Act of Parliament that is passed Parliament Acts 1911/1949 Scotland Act 1998 Conventions Unwritten principles that are accepted as law within the political community Salisbury convention that the HofL cannot block laws that were in winning party’s manifesto Convention of Collective Ministerial Responsibility Authoritative works Works of legal authority that act as guides: Bagehot’s English Constitution of 1867 showed how Executive and Parliament should relate. Gus O’Donnel in 2010 wrote the guide on Coalition forming. Common Law Common law is legal precedence created by judges rulings as opposed to new laws. Many rights of citizen’s exist in this form. Treaties Treaties signed and passed by Parliament are binding: European Communities Act 1972 Traditions Actions that have become tradition: Queen opening Parliament with the joint session and Queen’s speech Nature of the British Constitution It is uncodified: The British Constitution is not written down in one formalised document. It is instead made up of lots of different laws, conventions etc. This means it can be changed easily. It is un-entrenched: The Constitution cannot be entrenched as Parliament is sovereign, so always has the power to change it by passing a law. It is unitary: All political power resides in one place- Parliament in London. Unlike a federal constitution like in the USA which has state laws and federal laws. Parliament is the sole maker of laws, and can take back all devolved power if it wants. 1.2 How the Constitution has changed since 1997 New Labour reforms 1997-2010 Reform Description Successes Failures Devolution Scottish parliament All created via It is asymmetric- Scotland created. referendum. has most power. Welsh and N. Irish Has allowed for laws to be The elections usually have Assemblies created. catered to each country. a low turnout- lower than London Has made the country general elections Mayor/Assembly more democratic. Scottish Nationalism created Kept peace and Union increased together. No strong governments Allowed for each region to Devolution in N.E England have a different rejected in referendum Coronavirus policy, 2004 allowing for better Difference in Coronavirus response. policy could be seen as chaotic Human Made the European Finally means all citizen’s Parliament is still Rights Act Convention of rights are written down. sovereign and can 1998 Human Rights law Seeks to entrench citizen’s overrule it. Made the European rights Court of Justice the highest court in UK Electoral Devolved systems All devolved areas are Turnouts have been low. reform use AMS, STV and more proportional. No strong Governments in 1998 SV No wasted votes any devolved area. ETC… ETC…. Reform of Reduced Hereditary Has made most lords Not finished House of Peers to 92. Now it appointed- so most are Still unelected Lords 1999 is mainly appointed. now there for being Still 92 Hereditary peers experts. Still 25 Bishops. Hereditary Peers now take Life Peers are too easy to role more seriously appoint- 790ish members Makes Parliament more means its largest body in democratic world. Reform of Established supreme Independence of judges Supreme Court is growing Judiciary court reduces power of in Political power and 2005 Separated judiciary Government. could be seen as getting from Government. JAC was set up to appoint too powerful. Made the Judiciary judges rather than Lord Chancellor can still independent Government. veto appointments FOIA 2000 Meant Citizens Has led to more Information can be could make requests transparency. withheld if the to see information Helped lead to expenses information is deemed as held by public scandal- showing linked to national bodies corruption in Parliament. security This is Used often. happening more regularly. Sometimes used for trivial questions- like John Prescott’s weight House of Established the Backbench Committee has DSCs still have a majority Commons Backbench Business allowed Backbenchers to for the Government. Reform Committee be more organised in Government still don’t Increased salaries of passing Private Bills and have to follow Select Committees. holding Govt. to account. recommendations. Introduced system DSCs have grown in of electing chairs of importance and Committees independence since reforms Coalition reforms 2010-2015 Reform Description Successes Failures Fixed Term Elections happen Was supposed to 2017- Theresa may Parliament 2011 every 5 years reduce power of Govt. circumvented law and in calling snap elections. showed it is unlikely to Governments have still actually stop a Govt. been able to call both 2019- Uncertainty over 2017 and 2019 Brexit would have led to elections. an election in normal times, but has created gridlock instead. All parties in the 2019 election promised to repeal it Gives queen more power in deciding who to invite to form Govt. Further After Referendum. Wales now has more Unenthusiastic support- Devolution to Wales given power independent Referendum turnout was Wales 2014 over raising new democratic power. 35% forms of tax English Votes for Has sought to solve Allows English MPs to Speaker alone has power English Laws West Lothian vote on English laws- to declare it an English 2015 Question. more democratic. Law- bit unclear. Means English MPs Used in Jan 2016 on SNP MPs worried Govt. only can vote on Housing Bill will use to their certain laws. advantage as Tories have most English MPs. Recall of MPs Gives Constituents Should give Tried to be used on act 2015 power to recall or Constituents more suspened DUP MP Ian vote out their MP. power. Paisley but failed to get 10% petition if MP Should make MPs more 10% (so close!) has been focused on representing Convoluted process suspended their constituents. Has now been used twice to successfully remove MPs- Peterborough in 2019/Breocn and Radnorshire 2019 Reforms since 2015 Reform Description Successes Failures Further Increased powers- Satisfied many voices in 2014 SNP and Greens still devolution to Power to set independence referendum. demand Scotland 2016 income tax, control Again helps to further spread independence VAT receipts and decision making power welfare provision Devolution to Many more areas Helped to spread decision Not very popular- cities and now have elected making power. poor turnout in regions mayors like Has increased the quality of elections- 29% in Manchester. representation in areas of Manchester in 2017. Regions now have England. Little real powers for more control over Allows bespoke spending for regions. business rates and certain areas. in Manchester they Andy Burnham Machester control their own Mayor became a popular health budget figure in aftermath of 2017 bombings Exiting the EU Britain will be / / Exiting the European Union. But we don’t know in what way yet 1.3 Role and powers of devolved institutions and their impacts Key features of Devolution: Not Federalism- Power is not permanently given to the areas. Parliamentary law is still supreme. It’s asymmetric- Scotland has much more power than any other area. It’s entrenched- All changes occurred via referendum. Due to this having popular support it is sometimes called Quasi-Federalism as no Govt. will likely take it away. Three types: o Administrative- Power to determine how services are run (all three have this) o Legislative- Power to make primary legislation (Just Scotland and N. Ireland have this) o Financial- Power to levy taxes and how to spend it (Scotland have gained this in 2016) Devolution in England Devolution to Cities and creation of Mayors who have control over policing, transport, planning and housing. Sadiq Khan has significant power over policing and transport- introducing frozen fees and the bus- hopper ticket. Devolution in Scotland Has led to the domination of Scottish politics by SNP. They gained an overall majority in 2011 and kept a Minority Govt. in 2016. The Majority Govt. led to the independence referendum of 2014- which was much closer than expected 55-45 voting no. This momentum carried SNP into 2015 general election, winning 56 of 59 seats. This vote led to even more devolution in 2016 act. Running out of steam after 2017 election losing many seats- going from 56 to 35. In 2018 now has power over income tax, control over receipts of income tax (how to spend money), controls half of revenue of VAT. Can control much of its own administration- Education for example- free Tuition fees. Devolution in Wales Has grown in power with 63% backing 2011 referendum for more power. Dominated by Labour, usually holding half of all seats Powers over key administrative areas such as NHS, Education and Environment. Devolution in N. Ireland Established to help solve religious conflict of the troubles- with a power sharing agreement. Unionists and Nationalists must both be present in the Govt. These forced coalitions are to try and stop a return to conflict. N.Ireland can make its own laws to cater to their situation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The House of Lords in 2005: a More Representative and Assertive Chamber?
    The House of Lords in 2005: A More Representative and Assertive Chamber? By Meg Russell and Maria Sciara February 2006 ISBN: 1 903 903 47 5 Published by The Constitution Unit School of Public Policy UCL (University College London) 29–30 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9QU Tel: 020 7679 4977 Fax: 020 7679 4978 Email: [email protected] Web: www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/ ©The Constitution Unit, UCL 2006 This report is sold subject to the condition that is shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. First Published February 2006 2 Contents Preface............................................................................................................................................................1 Summary of key points................................................................................................................................3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................5 Lords reform doesn’t happen (again)........................................................................................................5 Changing composition: a more representative chamber? ......................................................................7 The Prevention of Terrorism
    [Show full text]
  • Elections Bill Explanatory Notes
    ELECTIONS BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES What these notes do These Explanatory Notes relate to the Elections Bill as introduced in the House of Commons on 5 July 2021 (Bill 138). ● These Explanatory Notes have been provided by the Cabinet Office in order to assist the reader of the Bill. They do not form part of the Bill and have not been endorsed by Parliament. ● These Explanatory Notes explain what each part of the Bill will mean in practice; provide background information on the development of policy; and provide additional information on how the Bill will affect existing legislation in this area. ● These Explanatory Notes might best be read alongside the Bill. They are not, and are not intended to be, a comprehensive description of the Bill. Bill 138–EN 58/2 Table of Contents Subject Page of these Notes Overview of the Bill 3 Policy Background 5 Legal background 19 Territorial Extent and Application 22 Commentary on Provisions of Bill 25 Part 1: Administration and Conduct of Elections 25 Voter Identification 25 Postal and Proxy Voting 35 Undue Influence 46 Assistance with voting for persons with disabilities 51 Northern Ireland elections 52 Part 2: Overseas Electors and EU Citizens 62 Overseas Electors 62 Clause 10: Extension of franchise for parliamentary elections: British citizens overseas 62 Voting and Candidacy Rights of EU citizens 69 Clause 11: Voting and Candidacy Rights of EU citizens 69 Part 3: The Electoral Commission 84 The Electoral Commission 84 Criminal Proceedings 87 Part 4: Regulation of Expenditure 88 Notional expenditure
    [Show full text]
  • Letter 13 October 2016 to Rt Hon Boris Johnson, Foreign Secretary
    International Development Committee House of Commons, London, SW1 A OAA • Tel: 020 7219 1223 Email: [email protected] Website: www.parliament.uk/indcom From Stephen Twigg MP, Chair Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Foreign and Commonwealth Office 13 October 2016 Follow-up to emergency debate on Syria and Aleppo Dear Boris, Further to the debate on Tuesday on 'Aleppo and Syria' I am writing to seek detailed answers to questions I raised. These questions arise from the International Development Committee's work. I am copying in Priti Patel and Amber Rudd as some of my questions relate to DFID and Home Office responsibilities. You may be aware the Committee published a Report on the Syrian refugee crisis in January of this year. 1 We recommended the Government should resettle 3,000 unaccompanied children from Europe in addition to the commitment to resettle 20,000 refugees from the region (para 63). It should also carry out resettlement quickly (para 65). In May 2016 in response to the amendments put forward by Lord Dubs to the Immigration Bill the Government announced that "Unaccompanied asylum-seeking children will be resettled from Greece, Italy and France" .2 The Immigration Act 2016 contained commitments that: 1. The Secretary of State must, as soon as possible after the passing of this Act, make arrangements to relocate to the United Kingdom and support a specified number of unaccompanied refugee children from other countries in Europe. 2. The number of children to be resettled under subsection (1) shall be determined by the Government in consultation with local authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF on Watching the Watchmen
    REPORT Watching the Watchmen The Growing Case for Recall Elections and Increased Accountability for MPs Sam Goodman About the Author Sam Goodman is the author of the Imperial Premiership: The Role of the Modern Prime Minister in Foreign Policy Making, 1964-2015 (Manchester University Press: 2015). He is currently working as a political adviser to Peter Dowd MP the current Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury and has previously worked for a variety of Labour Members of Parliament including: Julie Cooper MP, Sir Mark Hendrick MP, Michael Dugher MP, and Rt. Hon Jack Straw MP. Watching the Watchmen: The Growing Case for Recall Elections and Increased Accountability for MPs Members of the House of Commons have long flirted parliamentary conventions and much procedure with the idea of British exceptionalism—citing the is arcane, which makes it difficult even for the UK’s role as the ‘mother of all parliaments’, its most ardent politically engaged citizen to follow unwritten constitution, its unitary voting system, proceedings and debates in the House of Commons. and the principle of the sovereignty of Parliament This separation between the governors and over the people—as a bulwark against the instability governed is exacerbated further by the limited customarily found in other western democracies. avenues available to the public to hold those elected In modern times, this argument held water as to account, which is exemplified by recent political it delivered stable parliamentary majorities, scandals, including allegations of bullying and peaceful transfers of power between governments, sexual harassment in the House of Commons. At the and kept in check the ideological fringes of both time of writing this report, no MP has been forced major political parties.
    [Show full text]
  • ANDREW MARR SHOW 9TH JUNE 2019 ESTHER MCVEY AM: Do You
    1 ESTHER MCVEY ANDREW MARR SHOW 9TH JUNE 2019 ESTHER MCVEY AM: Do you think, Esther McVey, that it makes a difference that you have a very different background – you didn’t go to Eton and all the rest of it – how would it feel different to have a woman of your background leading the Conservative Party? EM: Well, our party is a broad church. It always has been. It’s about meritocracy. And for me, our party’s also about social mobility. It’s about anybody can come from anywhere and achieve the highest post in the land, so long as they are prepared to work hard enough, so long as they can get a good team together and so long as you’ve got a vision that reaches out to the country. And that’s why I’m travelling the country all the time as part of a pub road show with blue collar Conservatives to really hear what people want us to do. Once we’ve delivered Brexit, what do they want after that? And they want money in schools, they want money going to police and they also, which I’ve announced today, is the public sector pay guarantee, because people want to know that they’re going to have a fair crack of the whip too. AM: But we’re not there yet. We’re not out of the EU yet. And your position on that is essentially that there’s not going to be another negotiation, they’re not really going to renegotiate, so we have to be prepared to leave at the end of October with no deal, if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 Halsbury's Laws of England (3) RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE
    Page 1 Halsbury's Laws of England (3) RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CROWN AND THE JUDICIARY 133. The monarch as the source of justice. The constitutional status of the judiciary is underpinned by its origins in the royal prerogative and its legal relationship with the Crown, dating from the medieval period when the prerogatives were exercised by the monarch personally. By virtue of the prerogative the monarch is the source and fountain of justice, and all jurisdiction is derived from her1. Hence, in legal contemplation, the Sovereign's Majesty is deemed always to be present in court2 and, by the terms of the coronation oath and by the maxims of the common law, as also by the ancient charters and statutes confirming the liberties of the subject, the monarch is bound to cause law and justice in mercy to be administered in all judgments3. This is, however, now a purely impersonal conception, for the monarch cannot personally execute any office relating to the administration of justice4 nor effect an arrest5. 1 Bac Abr, Prerogative, D1: see COURTS AND TRIBUNALS VOL 24 (2010) PARA 609. 2 1 Bl Com (14th Edn) 269. 3 As to the duty to cause law and justice to be executed see PARA 36 head (2). 4 2 Co Inst 187; 4 Co Inst 71; Prohibitions del Roy (1607) 12 Co Rep 63. James I is said to have endeavoured to revive the ancient practice of sitting in court, but was informed by the judges that he could not deliver an opinion: Prohibitions del Roy (1607) 12 Co Rep 63; see 3 Stephen's Commentaries (4th Edn) 357n.
    [Show full text]
  • ECON Thesaurus on Brexit
    STUDY Requested by the ECON Committee ECON Thesaurus on Brexit Fourth edition Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies Authors: Stephanie Honnefelder, Doris Kolassa, Sophia Gernert, Roberto Silvestri Directorate General for Internal Policies of the Union July 2017 EN DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT A: ECONOMIC AND SCIENTIFIC POLICY ECON Thesaurus on Brexit Fourth edition Abstract This thesaurus is a collection of ECON related articles, papers and studies on the possible withdrawal of the UK from the EU. Recent literature from various sources is categorised, chronologically listed – while keeping the content of previous editions - and briefly summarised. To facilitate the use of this tool and to allow an easy access, certain documents may appear in more than one category. The thesaurus is non-exhaustive and may be updated. This document was provided by Policy Department A at the request of the ECON Committee. IP/A/ECON/2017-15 July 2017 PE 607.326 EN This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. AUTHORS Stephanie HONNEFELDER Doris KOLASSA Sophia GERNERT, trainee Roberto SILVESTRI, trainee RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Stephanie HONNEFELDER Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR Policy departments provide in-house and external expertise to support EP committees and other parliamentary bodies
    [Show full text]
  • BBC Guide to Parliament (Updated to 2021)
    BBC Guide to Parliament (Updated to 2021) There has been a parliament at Westminster since the 13th Century. Today it remains the centre of British government, boasting a colourful history and frequently adding new chapters. Parliament is the place where politicians meet to decide laws and make decisions on running the UK, although some issues in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are now dealt with by their respective parliaments and assemblies. Decisions on setting taxes to fund the government's policies are also FACT: MPs and made in Parliament. Lords do not refer to The business of Parliament takes place in two "houses": the elected each other's debating chambers House of Commons and the House of Lords, whose members are by name - instead mostly appointed. they refer to "the Their work is similar: making laws (legislation), checking the work of other place”. the government (scrutiny), and debating current issues. Generally, the decisions made in one house have to be approved by the other, but the Commons is by far the more powerful of the two chambers. No longer 646; now 650 Now between 700 - 800 Term Definition Minister Backbencher Whip Crossbencher Law Lord Opposition Shadow Government The government is normally formed by the leader of the party that wins the most seats in the general election. If the party wins an overall majority (more than half – i.e. at least 326) of the seats, the government will comprise some of the elected members belonging to that party - and possibly some of its members in the House of Lords. If the leading party does not have an overall majority, its leader may have to approach other parties to enable it to form a minority government (Recent example: in 2017 Theresa May’s minority government was supported for 2 years by the DUP (Democratic Unionist Party) from N.Ireland) or form a coalition and allow the coalition partners to have representation in the government( e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Speakers of the House of Commons
    Parliamentary Information List BRIEFING PAPER 04637a 21 August 2015 Speakers of the House of Commons Speaker Date Constituency Notes Peter de Montfort 1258 − William Trussell 1327 − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Styled 'Procurator' Henry Beaumont 1332 (Mar) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Sir Geoffrey Le Scrope 1332 (Sep) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Probably Chief Justice. William Trussell 1340 − William Trussell 1343 − Appeared for the Commons alone. William de Thorpe 1347-1348 − Probably Chief Justice. Baron of the Exchequer, 1352. William de Shareshull 1351-1352 − Probably Chief Justice. Sir Henry Green 1361-1363¹ − Doubtful if he acted as Speaker. All of the above were Presiding Officers rather than Speakers Sir Peter de la Mare 1376 − Sir Thomas Hungerford 1377 (Jan-Mar) Wiltshire The first to be designated Speaker. Sir Peter de la Mare 1377 (Oct-Nov) Herefordshire Sir James Pickering 1378 (Oct-Nov) Westmorland Sir John Guildesborough 1380 Essex Sir Richard Waldegrave 1381-1382 Suffolk Sir James Pickering 1383-1390 Yorkshire During these years the records are defective and this Speaker's service might not have been unbroken. Sir John Bussy 1394-1398 Lincolnshire Beheaded 1399 Sir John Cheyne 1399 (Oct) Gloucestershire Resigned after only two days in office. John Dorewood 1399 (Oct-Nov) Essex Possibly the first lawyer to become Speaker. Sir Arnold Savage 1401(Jan-Mar) Kent Sir Henry Redford 1402 (Oct-Nov) Lincolnshire Sir Arnold Savage 1404 (Jan-Apr) Kent Sir William Sturmy 1404 (Oct-Nov) Devonshire Or Esturmy Sir John Tiptoft 1406 Huntingdonshire Created Baron Tiptoft, 1426.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Government for BIA Members
    A guide to the Government for BIA members Correct as of 11 January 2018 On 8-9 January 2018, Prime Minister Theresa May conducted a ministerial reshuffle. This guide has been updated to reflect the changes. The Conservative government does not have a parliamentary majority of MPs but has a confidence and supply deal with the Northern Irish Democratic Unionist Party (DUP). The DUP will support the government in key votes, such as on the Queen's Speech and Budgets, as well as Brexit and security matters, which are likely to dominate most of the current Parliament. This gives the government a working majority of 13. This is a briefing for BIA members on the new Government and key ministerial appointments for our sector. Contents Ministerial and policy maker positions in the new Government relevant to the life sciences sector .......................................................................................... 2 Ministerial brief for the Life Sciences.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Theresa May’s team in Number 10 ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Ministerial and policy maker positions in the new Government relevant to the life sciences sector* *Please note that this guide only covers ministers and responsibilities pertinent
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Hasty Brexit? Ministerial Turnover and Its Implications
    Making a Hasty Brexit? Ministerial Turnover and Its Implications Jessica R. Adolino, Ph. D. Professor of Political Science James Madison University Draft prepared for presentation at the European Studies Association Annual Meeting May 9-12, 2019, Denver, Colorado Please do not cite or distribute without author’s permission. By almost any measure, since the immediate aftermath of the June 16, 2016 Brexit referendum, the British government has been in a state of chaos. The turmoil began with then- Prime Minister David Cameron’s resignation on June 17 and succession by Theresa May within days of the vote. Subsequently, May’s decision to call a snap election in 2017 and the resulting loss of the Conservatives’ parliamentary majority cast doubt on her leadership and further stirred up dissension in her party’s ranks. Perhaps more telling, and the subject of this paper, is the unprecedented number of ministers1—from both senior and junior ranks—that quit the May government over Brexit-related policy disagreements2. Between June 12, 2017 and April 3, 2019, the government witnessed 45 resignations, with high-profile secretaries of state and departmental ministers stepping down to return to the backbenches. Of these, 34 members of her government, including 9 serving in the Cabinet, departed over issues with some aspect of Brexit, ranging from dissatisfaction with the Prime Minister’s Withdrawal Agreement, to disagreements about the proper role of Parliament, to questions about the legitimacy of the entire Brexit process. All told, Theresa May lost more ministers, and at a more rapid pace, than any other prime minister in modern times.
    [Show full text]
  • Stapylton Final Version
    1 THE PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE OF FREEDOM FROM ARREST, 1603–1629 Keith A. T. Stapylton UCL Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2016 Page 2 DECLARATION I, Keith Anthony Thomas Stapylton, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed Page 3 ABSTRACT This thesis considers the English parliamentary privilege of freedom from arrest (and other legal processes), 1603-1629. Although it is under-represented in the historiography, the early Stuart Commons cherished this particular privilege as much as they valued freedom of speech. Previously one of the privileges requested from the monarch at the start of a parliament, by the seventeenth century freedom from arrest was increasingly claimed as an ‘ancient’, ‘undoubted’ right that secured the attendance of members, and safeguarded their honour, dignity, property, and ‘necessary’ servants. Uncertainty over the status and operation of the privilege was a major contemporary issue, and this prompted key questions for research. First, did ill definition of the constitutional relationship between the crown and its prerogatives, and parliament and its privileges, lead to tensions, increasingly polemical attitudes, and a questioning of the royal prerogative? Where did sovereignty now lie? Second, was it important to maximise the scope of the privilege, if parliament was to carry out its business properly? Did ad hoc management of individual privilege cases nevertheless have the cumulative effect of enhancing the authority and confidence of the Commons? Third, to what extent was the exploitation or abuse of privilege an unintended consequence of the strengthening of the Commons’ authority in matters of privilege? Such matters are not treated discretely, but are embedded within chapters that follow a thematic, broadly chronological approach.
    [Show full text]