DOCSLIB.ORG

Status of the Least Chipmunk (Tamias Minimus) Subspecies T

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

STATUS OF THE LEAST CHIPMUNK (TAMIAS MINIMUS) SUBSPECIES T. M. OREOCETES AND T. M. SELKIRKI IN BRITISH COLUMBIA by D. Nagorsen Illustration © Michael Hames Victoria, B.C. Wildlife Working Report No. WR 116 December 2004 i Wildlife Working Reports frequently contain preliminary data, so conclusions based on these may be subject to change. Working Reports receive little review. They may be cited in publications, but their manuscript status should be noted. Copies may be obtained on-line from http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wld/ or from the Ministry of Environment, Ecosystems Branch, P.O. Box 9338 Stn. Prov. Govt., Victoria, BC V8W 9M1. © Province of British Columbia ISBN 978-0-7726-6289-7 Date: May 6, 2010 British Columbia. Ministry of Environment. Status of the Least Chipmunk (Tamias minimus) subspecies T. m. oreocetes and T. m. selkirki in British Columbia Citation Nagorsen, D.W. 2004. Status of the Least Chipmunk (Tamias minimus) subspecies T. m. oreocetes and T. m. selkirki in British Columbia. B.C. Ministry of Environment, Victoria, BC. Wildlife Working Report No. WR 116. 37pp. ii DISCLAIMER In cases where a Wildlife Working Report or Bulletin is also a species’ status report, it may contain a status recommendation from the author. The Province, in consultation with experts, will determine the official conservation status and consider official legal designation. The data contained in the status report will be considered during those processes. NOTE: The content of this report was completed in March of 2004 and reflects the state of our knowledge of this species at that time. It has not been updated prior to publication April 2010. Information on current status of native species in British Columbia can be found through B.C. Species and Ecosystems Explorer http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/atrisk/toolintro.html iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This status report was funded by the British Columbia Ministry of Water, Air and Land Protection. Mark Fraker, who initiated the Kootenay chipmunk research project in 1996, collected some of the specimens and habitat data that provide a basis for this report. Nick Panter assisted with field work in the Kootenay chipmunk research project, and prepared the voucher specimens and genital bone preparations used for identification. Ian Parfitt created the range map and provided a digital file of the map; Dana Diotte created the map of coalfields. Dave Grieve provided information on coalfields in the Kootenay region of British Columbia. I thank Laura Friis, John Krebs, and Ted Antifeau for their support. The following museums provided the author with their museum records and specimen loans of Least Chipmunk s from British Columbia: American Museum of Natural History, New York; Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa; Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley; Royal British Columbia Museum, Victoria; Cowan Vertebrate Museum, University of British Columbia, Vancouver. iv SUMMARY The Least Chipmunk (Tamias minimus), found throughout the boreal forest and western Cordillera, has the largest distributional area of any chipmunk. Twenty-one subspecies are recognized; four occur in British Columbia. Two subspecies, T. m. oreocetes and T. m. selkirki, are confined to alpine areas in the southern Rocky and Purcell Mountains and are of conservation concern. They are the only subspecies of the Least Chipmunk that are confined to alpine. Although inadequate samples prohibit definitive conclusions about their taxonomic status, their divergence in male genital morphology, disjunct distributions, and restriction to alpine suggest they qualify as distinct units for management, conservation, and ranking. T. m. selkirki has probably been isolated in the Purcell Mountains since the early postglacial, and it may represent a phylogeographic lineage separate from Least Chipmunks in the Rocky Mountains. T. m. oreocetes inhabits a small area in the Rocky Mountains of Glacier National Park, Montana and the southern Rocky Mountains of British Columbia and Alberta where its range extends as far north as the Bow River and Kicking Horse Pass. In British Columbia, it inhabits the subalpine-alpine from about 1945 to 2320 m. Krummholz tree islands and talus are the preferred habitat. Its narrow elevational range is largely the result of competition with the Yellow-pine Chipmunk (Tamias amoenus) and Red-tailed Chipmunk (Tamias ruficaudus), larger chipmunks that exclude the Least Chipmunk from forest. T. m. selkirki is known from only two localized areas in the southern Purcell Mountains of British Columbia: Springs Creek basin and Mount Brewer. T. minimus appears to be absent from the northern Purcell Mountains and the Selkirk Mountains. T. m. selkirki is known from a narrow elevational zone of about 2134 to 2380 m where it inhabits tree islands and talus similar to T. m. oreocetes. T. minimus is a facultative hibernator. Rather than accumulating heavy fat reserves, it depends on seeds stored in its burrow for winter survival. T. m. oreocetes and T. m. selkirki demonstrate several adaptations for survival in a harsh alpine environment—a small body size, lower metabolic rates, reduced fecundity, and wary behaviour. Breeding begins shortly after animals emerge from hibernation in spring. Females produce only one litter in the breeding season; only 25–50% of yearling females will breed. There are few threats to these subspecies. They are not affected by forest harvesting or forest fire, and are tolerant of human activity associated with ski developments or wilderness camping. Open pit coal mines in the Rocky Mountains have altered some alpine talus habitats, but these mines represent an insignificant portion of the range of T. m. oreocetes. Off-road vehicles are active in the Springs Creek basin, but T. m. selkirki is associated with talus areas above the old roads and open meadows. The British Columbia Conservation Data Centre currently ranks T. m. oreocetes as S2S3 because of its limited range and few occurrences. Although it has a restricted range in British Columbia (extent of occurrence is 150 km2 and includes 10 known occurrences), much of its Canadian range occurs within provincial and national protected areas along the Continental Divide. Except for the localized v effects of open pit coal mines, no threats are known. There is no evidence of habitat or population declines. Populations of T. m. oreocetes in British Columbia are connected to populations in Montana and Alberta. About 40% of the distributional area of this subspecies is in British Columbia, and 90% is in Canada. A Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) assessment of this subspecies will have to include data from the Alberta population. T. m. selkirki is ranked as S1S3 by the British Columbia Conservation Data Centre; it is ranked as Vulnerable in the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) Red Book. It is endemic to British Columbia, and its distributional range is restricted to two localized areas in the southern Purcell Mountains (extent of occurrence is about 30 km2 and includes about five occurrences). The area of occupancy is probably less than 100 km2, and the number of mature animals is less than 1000. No threats are known other than stochastic extinction events associated with small, isolated populations and possible future mining activity. Priorities for conserving and managing T. m. oreocetes include molecular studies to verify the taxonomic validity of this race, and inventories in the mountains west of the Flathead River valley to determine the limits of its range. More inventory is essential to determine if T. m. selkirki is present in the Purcell Wilderness Conservancy and to what extent the Springs Creek and Mount Brewer occurrences are isolated subpopulations. Future mining activity and off- road vehicle activity at the Paradise Mine site near the Springs Creek basin should be monitored for their possible impact on T. m. selkirki. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................................. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................. vii LIST OF APPENDICES .............................................................................................................. viii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... viii 1 SPECIES INFORMATION ..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Name and Classification ................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Description ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Nationally Significant Populations ................................................................................... 3 2 BIOLOGY ................................................................................................................................ 3 2.1 General .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Reproduction ....................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Mammals of the California Desert

    Mammals of the California Desert

    MAMMALS OF THE CALIFORNIA DESERT William F. Laudenslayer, Jr. Karen Boyer Buckingham Theodore A. Rado INTRODUCTION I ,+! The desert lands of southern California (Figure 1) support a rich variety of wildlife, of which mammals comprise an important element. Of the 19 living orders of mammals known in the world i- *- loday, nine are represented in the California desert15. Ninety-seven mammal species are known to t ':i he in this area. The southwestern United States has a larger number of mammal subspecies than my other continental area of comparable size (Hall 1981). This high degree of subspeciation, which f I;, ; leads to the development of new species, seems to be due to the great variation in topography, , , elevation, temperature, soils, and isolation caused by natural barriers. The order Rodentia may be k., 2:' , considered the most successful of the mammalian taxa in the desert; it is represented by 48 species Lc - occupying a wide variety of habitats. Bats comprise the second largest contingent of species. Of the 97 mammal species, 48 are found throughout the desert; the remaining 49 occur peripherally, with many restricted to the bordering mountain ranges or the Colorado River Valley. Four of the 97 I ?$ are non-native, having been introduced into the California desert. These are the Virginia opossum, ' >% Rocky Mountain mule deer, horse, and burro. Table 1 lists the desert mammals and their range 1 ;>?-axurrence as well as their current status of endangerment as determined by the U.S. fish and $' Wildlife Service (USWS 1989, 1990) and the California Department of Fish and Game (Calif.
  • Selkirk Mountains Grizzly Bear Recovery Area 2015 Research and Monitoring Progress Report

    Selkirk Mountains Grizzly Bear Recovery Area 2015 Research and Monitoring Progress Report

    SELKIRK MOUNTAINS GRIZZLY BEAR RECOVERY AREA 2015 RESEARCH AND MONITORING PROGRESS REPORT PREPARED BY WAYNE F. KASWORM, ALEX WELANDER, THOMAS G. RADANDT, JUSTIN E. TEISBERG, WAYNE L. WAKKINEN, MICHAEL PROCTOR, AND CHRISTOPHER SERVHEEN 2016 UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE GRIZZLY BEAR RECOVERY COORDINATOR'S OFFICE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA, MAIN HALL ROOM 309 MISSOULA, MONTANA 59812 (406) 243-4903 1 Abstract: Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) captured and monitored a radio collared sample of grizzly bears in the SMGBRZ from 1983 until 2002 to determine distribution, home ranges, cause specific mortality, reproductive rates, and population trend. This effort was suspended in 2003 due to funding constraints and management decisions. In cooperation with IDFG and the Panhandle National Forest (USFS) this effort was reinitiated during 2012 with personnel from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). During 2013 the program was expanded with funding from IDFG, USFS, several sources in British Columbia (BC), and USFWS. This cooperative research and monitoring effort was expanded to involve Idaho Department of Lands, the Kalispel Tribe, the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho, and Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife in 2014 Numbers of females with cubs in the Selkirk Mountains grizzly bear recovery zone (SMGBRZ) varied from 0–4 per year and averaged 1.5 per year from 2010–15. Human caused mortality averaged 1.7 bears per year and 0.7 females per year. Ten human caused mortalities during 2010-15 include 4 females (all BC) and 6 males (one US and five BC). Human caused mortalities during 2010-15 were four adult females (one vehicle collision and three under investigation), one adult male (management), and four subadult males (two management, one mistaken identity, and one self-defense).
  • Black-Tailed Prairie Dog Management Plan

    Black-Tailed Prairie Dog Management Plan

    Badlands National Park – North Unit Environmental Assessment U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Badlands National Park, North Unit Pennington and Jackson Counties, South Dakota Black-Tailed Prairie Dog Management Plan Environmental Assessment August 2007 Badlands National Park – North Unit Environmental Assessment National Park Service Prairie Dog Management Plan U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Black-Tailed Prairie Dog Management Plan Environmental Assessment Badlands National Park, North Unit Pennington and Jackson Counties, South Dakota Executive Summary The U.S. Department of Interior, National Park Service (NPS) proposes to implement a comprehensive black-tailed prairie dog management plan for the North Unit of Badlands National Park where prairie dog populations have increased from approximately 2,070 acres in 1979 to 6,363 acres in 2006, or 11% of the approximately 60,000 acres of available suitable habitat. The principal objectives of the management plan are to ensure that the black-tailed prairie dog is maintained in its role as a keystone species in the mixed-grass prairie ecosystem on the North Unit, while providing strategies to effectively manage instances of prairie dog encroachment onto adjacent private lands. The plan also seeks to manage the North Unit’s prairie dog populations to sustain numbers sufficient to survive unpredictable events that may cause high mortality, such as sylvatic plague, while at the same time allowing park managers to meet management goals for other North Unit resources. Primary considerations in developing the plan include conservation of the park’s natural processes and conditions, identification of effective tools for prairie dog management, implementing strategies to deal with prairie dog encroachment onto adjacent private lands, and protection of human health and safety.
  • CANADA's MOUNTAIN Rocky Mountain Goats

    CANADA's MOUNTAIN Rocky Mountain Goats

    CANADA'S MOUNTAIN Rocky Mountain Goats CANADA'S MOUNTAIN PLAYGROUNDS BANFF • JASPER • WATERTON LAKES • YOHO KOOTENAY ° GLACIER • MOUNT REVELSTOKE The National Parks of Canada ANADA'S NATIONAL PARKS are areas The National Parks of Canada may, for C of outstanding beauty and interest that purposes of description, be grouped in three have been set apart by the Federal Govern­ main divisions—the scenic and recreational ment for public use. They were established parks in the mountains of Western Canada; the to maintain the primitive beauty of the land­ scenic, recreational, wild animals, and historic scape, to conserve the native wildlife of the parks of the Prairie Provinces; and the scenic, country, and to preserve sites of national his­ recreational, and historic parks of Eastern Can­ toric interest. As recreational areas they pro­ ada. In these pages will be found descriptions vide ideal surroundings for the enjoyment of of the national parks in the first group—areas outdoor life, and now rank among Canada's which lie within the great mountain regions outstanding tourist attractions. of Alberta and British Columbia. Canada's National Park system teas estab­ * * * lished in 1SS5, when a small area surrounding mineral hot springs at Banff in the Rocky This publication is compiled in co-operation Mountains was reserved as a public posses­ with the National Parks Branch, Department sion. From this beginning has been developed of Northern Affairs and National Resources. the great chain of national playgrounds note Additional information concerning these parks stretching across Canada from the Selkirk may be obtained from the Park Superintend­ Mountains in British Columbia to the Atlantic ents, or from the Canadian Government Travel Coast of Nova Scotia.
  • The Effects of Linear Developments on Wildlife

    The Effects of Linear Developments on Wildlife

    Bibliography Rec# 5. LeBlanc, R. 1991. The aversive conditioning of a roadside habituated grizzly bear within Banff Park: progress report 1991. 6 pp. road impacts/ grizzly bear/ Ursus arctos/ Banff National Park/ aversive conditions/ Icefields Parkway. Rec# 10. Forman, R.T.T. 1983. Corridors in a landscape: their ecological structure and function. Ekologia 2 (4):375-87. corridors/ landscape/ width. Rec# 11. McLellan, B.N. 1989. Dymanics of a grizzly bear population during a period of industrial resource extraction. III Natality and rate of increase. Can. J. Zool. Vol. 67 :1865-1868. reproductive rate/ grizzly bear/ Ursus arctos/ British Columbia/ gas exploration/ timber harvest. Rec# 14. McLellan, B.N. 1989. Dynamics of a grizzly bear population during a period of industrial resource extraction. II.Mortality rates and causes of death. Can. J. Zool. Vol. 67 :1861-1864. British Columbia/ grizzly bear/ Ursus arctos/ mortality rate/ hunting/ outdoor recreation/ gas exploration/ timber harvest. Rec# 15. Miller, S.D., Schoen, J. 1993. The Brown Bear in Alaska . brown bear/ grizzly bear/ Ursus arctos middendorfi/ Ursus arctos horribilis/ population density/ distribution/ legal status/ human-bear interactions/ management/ education. Rec# 16. Archibald, W.R., Ellis, R., Hamilton, A.N. 1987. Responses of grizzly bears to logging truck traffic in the Kimsquit River valley, British Columbia. Int. Conf. Bear Res. and Manage. 7:251-7. grizzly bear/ Ursus / arctos/ roads/ traffic/ logging/ displacement/ disturbance/ carnivore/ BC/ individual disruption / habitat displacement / habitat disruption / social / filter-barrier. Rec# 20. Kasworm, W.F., Manley, T.L. 1990. Road and trail influences on grizzly bears and black bears in northwest Montana.
  • Chipmunks (Genus Tamias) in the Northern Rocky Mountains

    Chipmunks (Genus Tamias) in the Northern Rocky Mountains

    Evolution, 57(8), 2003, pp. 1900±1916 PHYLOGEOGRAPHY AND INTROGRESSIVE HYBRIDIZATION: CHIPMUNKS (GENUS TAMIAS) IN THE NORTHERN ROCKY MOUNTAINS JEFFREY M. GOOD,1,2 JOHN R. DEMBOSKI,3 DAVID W. NAGORSEN,4,5 AND JACK SULLIVAN1 1Department of Biological Sciences, Box 443051, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844-3051 3Biological Sciences Department, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, 3801 West Temple Avenue, Pomona, California 91768-4032 4Royal British Columbia Museum, Victoria, British Columbia V8V 1X4, Canada Abstract. If phylogeographic studies are to be broadly used for assessing population-level processes relevant to speciation and systematics, the ability to identify and incorporate instances of hybridization into the analytical frame- work is essential. Here, we examine the evolutionary history of two chipmunk species, Tamias ru®caudus and Tamias amoenus, in the northern Rocky Mountains by integrating multivariate morphometrics of bacular (os penis) variation, phylogenetic estimation, and nested clade analysis with regional biogeography. Our results indicate multiple examples of mitochondrial DNA introgression layered within the evolutionary history of these nonsister species. Three of these events are most consistent with recent and/or ongoing asymmetric introgression of mitochondrial DNA across mor- phologically de®ned secondary contact zones. In addition, we ®nd preliminary evidence where a fourth instance of nonconcordant characters may represent complete ®xation of introgressed mitochondrial DNA via a more ancient hybridization event, although alternative explanations of convergence or incomplete sorting of ancestral polymorphisms cannot be dismissed with these data. The demonstration of hybridization among chipmunks with strongly differentiated bacular morphology contradicts long-standing assumptions that variation within this character is diagnostic of complete reproductive isolation within Tamias.
  • Mammal Pests

    Mammal Pests

    VERTEBRATE PEST CONT ROL HANDBOOK - MAMMALS Mammal Pests Introduction This section contains methods used to control field rodents and rabbits and is a guide for agricultural commissioner personnel engaged in this work. Most pest mammals are discussed with specific control options. Rodenticides are often recommended. Before rodenticides are used, acceptance tests should be made to indicate the degree of bait acceptance that can be expected. If bait acceptance is good, most of the bait will be quickly consumed by rodents during a 24-hour period. If acceptance is poor, toxic bait should not be used. Too frequent application of acute toxic baits, like zinc phosphide, may cause bait and poison shyness. Unlike insecticides, which are generally applied to the crop itself, rodent baits are commonly placed in rodent burrows or applied to trails or areas where rodents naturally feed. Rodent baits should not be applied in any manner that will contaminate food or feed crops. This would include any application method which would cause the bait to lodge in food plants. Fumigants are applied directly into the rodent burrow and are sealed in by covering the burrow opening with a shovelful of dirt. Identifying Rodents Causing Damage to Crops One of the keys to controlling rodent damage in crops is prompt and accurate determination of which species is causing the damage. To make a positive species identification, survey the area of reported damage and look for signs of rodent activity such as: trails, runs, tracks and tail marks, droppings, burrows, nests and food caches. Also look for cuttings of grass or plant material in trails, runs or near burrow entrances.
  • Tamias Ruficaudus Simulans, Red-Tailed Chipmunk

    Tamias Ruficaudus Simulans, Red-Tailed Chipmunk

    Conservation Assessment for the Red-Tailed Chipmunk (Tamias ruficaudus simulans) in Washington Jennifer Gervais May 2015 Oregon Wildlife Institute Disclaimer This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on the red-tailed chipmunk (Tamias ruficaudus simulans). If you have information that will assist in conserving this species or questions concerning this Conservation Assessment, please contact the interagency Conservation Planning Coordinator for Region 6 Forest Service, BLM OR/WA in Portland, Oregon, via the Interagency Special Status and Sensitive Species Program website at http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/sfpnw/issssp/contactus/ U.S.D.A. Forest Service Region 6 and U.S.D.I. Bureau of Land Management Interagency Special Status and Sensitive Species Program Executive Summary Species: Red-tailed chipmunk (Tamias ruficaudus) Taxonomic Group: Mammal Management Status: The red-tailed chipmunk is considered abundant through most of its range in western North America, but it is highly localized in Alberta, British Columbia, and Washington (Jacques 2000, Fig. 1). The species is made up of two fairly distinct subspecies, T. r. simulans in the western half of its range, including Washington, and T. r. ruficaudus in the east (e.g., Good and Sullivan 2001, Hird and Sullivan 2009). In British Columbia, T. r. simulans is listed as Provincial S3 or of conservation concern and is on the provincial Blue List (BC Conservation Data Centre 2014). The Washington Natural Heritage Program lists the red-tailed chipmunk’s global rank as G2, “critically imperiled globally because of extreme rarity or because of some factor(s) making it especially vulnerable to extinction,” and its state status as S2 although the S2 rank is uncertain.
  • A Hundred Years of Natural History the Vancouver Natural History Society, 1918–2018

    A Hundred Years of Natural History the Vancouver Natural History Society, 1918–2018

    A Hundred Years of Natural History The Vancouver Natural History Society, 1918–2018 Susan Fisher and Daphne Solecki A Hundred Years of Natural History The Vancouver Natural History Society 1918–2018 A Hundred Years of Natural History: The Vancouver Natural History Society, 1918–2018 © 2018 Vancouver Natural History Society Published by: Vancouver Natural History Society Nature Vancouver PO Box 3021, Stn. Terminal Vancouver, BC V6B 3X5 Printed by: Infigo www.infigo.ca Hundred Years Editorial Committee: Daphne Solecki, Susan Fisher, Bev Ramey, Cynthia Crampton, Marian Coope Book design: Laura Fauth Front cover: VNHS campers on Savary Island, 1918. Photo by John Davidson. City of Vancouver Archives CVA 660-297 Back cover: 2018 Camp at McGillivray Pass. Photos by Jorma Neuvonen (top) and Nigel Peck (bottom). ISBN 978-0-9693816-2-4 To the countless volunteers who have served and continue to serve our society and nature in so many ways. Table of Contents Acknowledgements.......................................... 5 Preface........................................................ 6 The.Past.of.Natural.History............................... 8 John.Davidson.............................................. 13 Indigenous.Connections.................................. 16 Objective.1:.To.promote.the.enjoyment.of.nature... 21 Objective.2:.To.foster.public.interest.and.education. in.the.appreciation.and.study.of.nature..............35 Objective.3:.To.encourage.the.wise.use.and. conservation.of.natural.resources.and Objective.4:.To.work.for.the.complete.protection.
  • USGS DDS-43, Status of Terrestrial Vertebrates

    USGS DDS-43, Status of Terrestrial Vertebrates

    DAVID M. GRABER National Biological Service Sequoia and Kings Canyon Field Station Three Rivers, California 25 Status of Terrestrial Vertebrates ABSTRACT The terrestrial vertebrate wildlife of the Sierra Nevada is represented INTRODUCTION by about 401 regularly occurring species, including three local extir- There are approximately 401 species of terrestrial vertebrates pations in the 20th century. The mountain range includes about two- that use the Sierra Nevada now or in recent times according thirds of the bird and mammal species and about half the reptiles to the California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System and amphibians in the State of California. This is principally because (CWHR) (California Department of Fish and Game 1994) (ap- of its great extent, and because its foothill woodlands and chaparral, pendix 25.1). Of these, thirteen are essentially restricted to mid-elevation forests, and alpine vegetation reflect, in structure and the Sierra in California (one of these is an alien; i.e. not native function if not species, habitats found elsewhere in the State. About to the Sierra Nevada); 278 (eight aliens) include the Sierra in 17% of the Sierran vertebrate species are considered at risk by state their principal range; and another 110 (six aliens) use the Si- or federal agencies; this figure is only slightly more than half the spe- erra as a minor portion of their range. Included in the 401 are cies at risk for the state as a whole. This relative security is a function 232 species of birds; 112 species of mammals; thirty-two spe- of the smaller proportion of Sierran habitats that have been exten- cies of reptiles; and twenty-five species of amphibians (ap- sively modified.
  • Kootenay National Park Visitor Guide

    Kootenay National Park Visitor Guide

    Visitor Guide 2021 – 2022 Paint Pots Trail Également offert en français Z. Lynch / Parks Canada 1 Welcome Welcome 2 Plan your adventure 3 Be a responsible visitor 4 Radium Hot Springs area Kootenay 6 Kootenay National Park map National Park 8 Make the most of your visit 10 Camping On April 21, 1920, the Government of Canada agreed to build a road connecting the Bow and Columbia 10 Interpretive programs and activities valleys. As part of the agreement, eight kilometres of land on either side of the road was set aside for a 11 Stay safe national park. 12 Conservation stories The first cars to travel along the new highway bounced over bumps and chugged up steep hills, 13 National park regulations but according to a 1924 guidebook, “every mile is a surprise and an enchantment.” A century later, Kootenay National Park continues to surprise and enchant. Visitors can relax in the soothing mineral pools at Radium Hot Springs, stroll through canyons, picnic beside glacial-blue rivers or backpack along one of the Rockies’ most scenic hiking trails. The park’s diverse ecosystems support a variety of wildlife, and newly unearthed Burgess Shale fossils reveal exquisite details about life half a Did you know? billion years ago. Kootenay National Park lies within the traditional lands of the Ktunaxa and Shuswap. Vermilion Crossing Z. LynchIconic / Parks 55 Canada km backcountry route: Z. Lynch / Parks Canada Rockwall Trail Z. Lynch / Parks Canada Ktunaxa Nation Shuswap Indian Band Columbia Valley Métis Association A place of global importance The Ktunaxa (k-too-nah-ha), also known as The Kenpesq’t (ken-pesk-t) community, currently Kootenay National Park is an important place for The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Kootenay, have occupied the lands adjacent to the known as the Shuswap Indian Band, is part of the British Columbia Métis based on a history of trade Cultural Organization (UNESCO) recognizes four Kootenay and Columbia Rivers and the Arrow Lakes Secwépemc (seck-wep-em) Nation occupying relationships and expeditions.
  • Golden-Mantled Ground Squirrel Or Chipmunk? by Lynne Brosch

    Golden-Mantled Ground Squirrel Or Chipmunk? by Lynne Brosch

    Who Is Your Pest? Golden-Mantled Ground Squirrel or Chipmunk? by Lynne Brosch Recently as I went around the lake doing talks on pest management, I had several complaints about chipmunks. People describe a lot of digging and eating of plants by these chipmunks. As I began thinking about putting out some information on how to handle the situation I thought about the golden-mantled ground squirrel, I watched eating garden plants voraciously on the Baldwin Estate grounds just yesterday. Perhaps gardeners need to know who they are dealing with. The golden-mantled ground squirrel looks a lot like a chipmunk. It has a large white stripe bordered by black on each side. The main difference between this squirrel and a chipmunk is that its stripes don’t go all the way to the face and it is a slightly larger animal. It lives along the west coast in coniferous forests and mountainous areas. It likes to eat plants, seeds, nuts, fruit and some insects. It lives in an underground burrow usually near trees or logs. Chipmunks have very similar burrows. Most common in the Tahoe basin is the Lodgepole chipmunk. Fencing can be used to protect plants from squirrels and chipmunks, but has challenges in effectiveness because of the excellent digging and climbing skills exhibited by these garden pests. Hardware cloth may be used to exclude animals from flower beds with seeds and bulbs covered by the hardware cloth and all covered with soil. This method of prevention may prove less costly and time consuming than trapping. The most successful method for control of ground squirrels and chipmunks is the use of traps.