DOCSLIB.ORG

V009-1875To1876-031.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
V009-1875To1876-031.Pdf JOURNALS OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY. VOL. IX. JOUENAJLS OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO. FROM NOV. 24TH, 1875, TO FEB. lOra, 1876. (BOTH DAYS INCLUSIVE.) IN THE THIRTY-NINTH YEAR OF THE REIGN OF OUR SOVEREIGN LADY QUEEN VICTORIA. BEING THE FIRST SESSION OF THE THIRD PARLIAMENT OF ONTARIO. SESSION 1875-6. PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY. VOL. IX. TORONTO : PRINTED BY HDNTBB, ROSE & CO. PROCLAMATIONS. Canada. Province of \ JOHN CRAWFORD. [L.S.] Ontario. VICTORIA, by the Grace of GOD, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, QUEEN, Defender of the Faith, &c., &c., &c. To Our Faithful the Members elected to serve in the Legislative Assembly of our Province of Ontario, and to all whom it may concern GREETING : 0. ) Mowat, TTTHEREAS We have thought fit, by and with the advice and con- Attorney-General. J ? Y sent of Our Executive Council of Our Province of Ontario, to dissolve the present Legislative Assembly of Our said Province, which stands pro- to the of next rogued SIXTEENTH day MARCH ; Now KNOW YE, that we do for that end publish this Our Royal Proclamation, and do hereby dissolve the Legislative Assembly accordingly, and the Members thereof are discharged from their meeting and attendance on the said SIXTEENTH day of JANUARY next. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, We have caused these Our Letters to be made Patent, and the Great Seal of Ontario, to be hereunto affixed : WITNESS, Our Right-Trusty and well-beloved JOHN CRAWFORD, Lieutenant-Gover- nor of Our Province of Ontario, at Our Government House, in Our City of Toronto, in Our said Province, this TWENTY-THIRD day of DECEMBER, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-four, and in the thirty-eighth year of Our Reign. By Command, S. J. VANKOUGHNET, Clerk of the Crown in Chancery, Ontario. Canada. ) Province of JOHN CRAWFORD. [L.S.] Ontario. ) VICTORIA, by the Grace of GOD, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, QUEEN, Defender of the Faith, &c., &c., &c. To all to whom these presents shall come GREETING : 0. 117 AS We are desirous and resolved, as soon as may be, to Mowat, \ HERE of Our Province of and to have Attorney-General. J VV meet Our people Ontario, will and to call a their advice in Our Legislature : We do make known Our Royal pleasure declare that the advice new Legislative Assembly for ,0ur said Province, and do further by writs in of Our Executive Council of Ontario, We have this day given orders for issuing Our which writs are due form, for calling a new Legislative Assembly for Our said Province, be returnable on to bear date on the Twenty-third day of December instant, and to which is the Second day of February next, except Our writ for the district of Algoma, to be returnable on the Fourteenth day of August next. vi PROCLAMATIONS. WE FURTHER DECLARE, that the elections for members of the said Legislative Assem- bly (other than the said district of Algoma) shall take place and be held on the ELEVENTH a is de- day of JANUARY next, and in all cases (other than the said district) where poll manded and granted, such poll shall be opened and held on the EIGHTEENTH day of JAN- next. UARY * IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, We have caused these Our Letters to be made Patent and the GreatiSeal of Ontario to be hereunto affixed : WITNESS, the Honourable JOHN CRAWFORD, Lieutenant-Governor of Our Province of Ontario, at Our Government House, in Our City of Toronto, in Our said Province, this TWENTY-THIRD day of DECEMBER, in the year of Our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-four, and in the thirty-eighth year of Our Reign. By Command, S. J. VANKOUGHNET, Clerk of the Crown in Chancery, Ontario. Canada. Province of } JOHN CRAWFORD. [L.S.] Ontario. VICTORIA, by the Grace of GOD, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, QUEEN, Defender of the Faith, &c., &c., &c. all To to whom these presents shall come GREETING : 0. Mowat, \ 17 NOW YE, that We, being desirous and resolved, as soon as may Attorney-General, j JY be, to meet Our people of Our Province of Ontario, and to have their advice in Our Legislature, do hereby, by and with the advice of Our Executive Council of Ontario, summon and call together the Legislative Assembly of Ontario, and to meet at Our City of Toronto, in Our said Province, on TUESDAY, the SECOND day of FEBRUARY next. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, We have caused these our Letters to be made Patent, the and Great Seal of Ontario to be hereunto affixed : WITNESS, Our Right-Trusty and well-beloved JOHN CRAWFORD, Lieutenant-Governor of Our Province of Ontario, at Our Government House, in Our City of Toronto, in Our said Province, this TWENTY-THIRD day of DECEM- BER, in the year of Our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seven- ty-four, and in the thirty-eighth year of Our Reign. By Command, , S. J. VANKOUGHNET, Clerk of the Crown in Chancery, Ontario. Canada. \ Province of V JOHN CRA WFORD. [L. S.] Ontario. J VICTORIA, by the Grace of GOD, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, QUEEN, Defender of the Faith, &c., &c., &c. To Our Faithful the Members elected to serve in the Legislative Assembly of our Pro- vince of Ontario, and summoned and called to a meeting of the Legislature of Our said Province, at Our City of Toronto, on TUESDAY, the SECOND day of the month of FEBRUARY, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-five, to have been commenced and held, and to every of you GREETING : 0. Mowat, WHEREAS the of the of the Province of On- | meeting Legislature VY Attorney-General. J tario stands prorogued to the SECOND day of the month of FEE- one RUARY, thousand eight hundred and seventy-five, at which time, at Our City of Toronto, PROCLAMATIONS. vii were held and constrained to you appear ; Now KNOW YE, that for divers causes and and into consideration considerations, taking the ease and convenience of Our loving sub- jects, We have thought fit, by and with the advice of Our Executive Council of the" Pro- vince of Ontario, to relieve you and each of you of yoar attendance at the time aforesaid,here- by convoking, and by these presents enjoining you, and each of you, that on MONDAY, the FIFTEENTH day of the month of MARCH next, you meet Us, in Our Legislature of the said Province, at Our City of Toronto, and therein to do as may seem necessary HEREIN FAIL NOT. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, We have caused these Our Letters to be made Patent, and the Great Seal of Ontario to be hereunto affixed : WITNESS, Our Right-Trusty and well-beloved JOHN CRAWFORD, Lieutenant-Governor of our Province of Ontario, at Our Government House, in Our City of Toronto, in Our said Province, this THIRTIETH day of JANUARY, in the of year our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-five, and in the thirty-eighth year of Our Reign. By Command, S. J. VANKOUGHNET, Clerk of the Crown in Chancery, Ontario. Canada. \ Province of V JOHN CRAWFORD. [L.S.] Ontario. ) VICTORIA, ly the Grace of GOD, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, QUEEN, Defender of the Faith &c., &c., &c. To Our Faithful the Members elected to serve in the Legislative Assembly of Our Pro- vince of Ontario, and summoned and called to a meeting of the Legislature of Our said Province, at Our City of Toronto, on MONDAY, the FIFTEENTH day of the month of MARCH, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-five, to have been commenced and held, and to every of you GREETING : On- 0. Mowat, } WHEREAS the meeting of the Legislature of the Province of YV tario to FIFTEENTH of the month of Attorney-General. J stands prorogued the day of MARCH, one thousand eight hundred and seventy-five, at which time, at Our City were held and constrained to Now KNOW that for divers causes Toronto, you appear ; YE, and considerations, and taking into consideration the ease and convenience of Our loving the of Our Executive Council of the subjects, We have thought fit, by and with advice Province of Ontario, to relieve you, and each of you, of your attendance at the time afore- on said, hereby convoking, and by these presents enjoining you, and each of you, that SATURDAY, the TWENTY-FOURTH day of the month of APRIL next, you meet Us, in Our Legislature of the said Province, at Our City of Toronto, and therein to do as may seem necessary HEREIN FAIL NOT. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, We have caused these Our Letters to be made Patent, and the Great Seal of Ontario to be hereunto affixed : WITNESS, Our Right-Trusty and well-beloved JOHN CRAWFORD, Lieutenant-Governor of of Our Province of Ontario, at Our Government House, in Our City in the Toronto, in our said Province, this THIRTEENTH day of MARCH, and in year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-five, the thirty-eighth year of Our Reign. By Command, S. J. VANKOUGHNET, Clerk of the Crown in Chancery, Ontario. viii PROCLAMATIONS. Canada. i Province of JOHN CRAWFORD. [L.S.] Ontario. VICTORIA, by the Grace of GOD, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, QUEEN, Defender of the Faith, &c., &c., &c. To Our Faithful the Members elected to serve in the Legislative Assembly of Our Pro- vince of Ontario, and summoned and called to a meeting of the Legislature of Our said Province, at Our City of Toronto, on SATURDAY, the TWENTY-FOURTH in of day of the month of APRIL, the year Our Lord one thousand eight hundred to have been commenced and and seventy-five, held, and to every of you GREETING : 0.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Waiting Periods and Direct Payments in Workers' Compensationances
    June 1998 Waiting Periods and Direct Payments in Workers’ Compensation (Prepared for the Royal Commission on Workers’ Compensation in British Columbia) by Morley Gunderson* and Douglas Hyatt** * Professor, Department of Economics and Centre for Industrial Relations, University of Toronto. ** Associate Professor, Scarborough College, Faculty of Management, and Centre for Industrial Relations, all of the University of Toronto, Research Associate, Institute for Policy Analysis, University of Toronto, and Senior Scientist, Institute for Work and Health. 1. Introduction At the time of introduction of workers’ compensation in North America, waiting periods were a prominent design feature. This appears, fundamentally, to be due to the heavy influence of the first jurisdictions to adopt compensation programs for work injuries on the jurisdictions that followed. The North American workers’ compensation system was heavily influenced by the German system, established in 1884 under Bismarck, to which both workers and employers both contributed. In Britain, the “Friendly Societies” in the pre-1880, were initially established to compensate injured workers and their families for death or disability associated with a workplace injury, without regard to fault. Workers’ paid for the cost of the system, but over time, employers agreed, either through collective negotiations or on their own accord, to assist in financing the societies. Frequently, the quid pro quo was an agreement that workers’ would not sue the contributing employer. In the United States, a number of early attempts to legislate workers’ compensation statutes were beaten back by the U.S. Supreme Court, which found many of the provisions of the legislation offensive to common law doctrine, including the absence of waiting periods (as a form of co-insurance).
    [Show full text]
  • 2012-2013 Benefits Policy Review: Pre-Existing Conditions
    2012-2013 Benefits Policy Review Pre-existing Conditions 1. Introduction The Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) is responsible for providing benefits to workers who have a work-related injury or disease. Workers who are injured “by accident arising out of and in the course of their employment” or are impaired by “an occupational disease that occurs due to the nature of” their employment are entitled to compensation under the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997 (WSIA)1. Prior to the introduction of workers‟ compensation legislation, employees who were injured at work were required to sue their employer to receive compensation. Due to the difficulties this presented, Ontario, followed by other Canadian jurisdictions, replaced the tort system for workplace injuries with a no-fault insurance scheme. The release of the Meredith Report2 led to the establishment of Ontario‟s compensation system in 1914, resulting in an historic compromise whereby workers would receive guaranteed benefits under a no-fault system that was paid for by employers who in return were protected against lawsuits. As set out in legislation, and to preserve the integrity and fairness of this system, the WSIB must draw a line between compensable work-related and non-compensable non-work-related injuries and disease. During the course of the recent Benefits Policy Review, led by Independent Chair, Jim Thomas, the challenges associated with “work-relatedness” and adjudicating claims involving pre-existing conditions became a focus of stakeholder submissions. As a result, although outside of the consultation's initial scope, Mr. Thomas addressed this issue at length in his Final Report3.
    [Show full text]
  • Worksafebc (“WCB”) Compensation System Review Worker Position Canadian Union of Public Employees (“CUPE”) Submission
    May 28, 2019 Via E-mail: [email protected] Ms. Janet Patterson Dear Ms. Patterson: Re: WorkSafeBC (“WCB”) Compensation System Review Worker Position Canadian Union of Public Employees (“CUPE”) Submission I. INTRODUCTION: I. I. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Thank you for requesting stakeholder feedback on the review of the WCB Compensation system. CUPE (BC) appreciates the opportunity to comment on this extremely important review and hopes that the recommendations from this review will be implemented immediately. CUPE’s understanding of the current review’s goals is that they are too shift the workers’ compensation system to become more worker centred via assessing the following: • the workers compensation system’s policies and practices that support injured workers’ return to work; • the WCB’s current policies and practices through a gender- and diversity-based analysis (commonly referred to as GBA+); • modernization of the WCB’s culture to reflect a worker-centric service delivery model; • the case management of injured workers; and • any potential amendments to the Workers Compensation Act arising from this focused review.1 1 CUPE requests that all related OHS Regulations, OHS Guidelines, Policy Practice Directives, etc. will also be reviewed and changed as required. This includes a complete review of the appellate tribunals and their respective policies and procedures. I.II. STAKEHOLDER INFORMATION: CUPE is Canada’s largest Union with over 680,000 members across the country and has more than 70 offices.2 CUPE represents workers in many sectors including health care, emergency services, education, early learning and child-care, municipalities, social services, libraries, utilities, transportation, airlines and more.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Statute Revisions in the Provinces of Upper Canada, Canada and Ontario Ontario
    Ontario: Revised Statutes 1980 History of Statute Revisions in the Provinces of Upper Canada, Canada and Ontario Ontario © Queen's Printer for Ontario, 1980 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/rso Bibliographic Citation Repository Citation Ontario (1980) "History of Statute Revisions in the Provinces of Upper Canada, Canada and Ontario," Ontario: Revised Statutes: Vol. 1980: Iss. 9, Article 43. Available at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/rso/vol1980/iss9/43 This Appendix is brought to you for free and open access by the Statutes at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ontario: Revised Statutes by an authorized administrator of Osgoode Digital Commons. HISTORY OF STATUTE REVISIONS 631 History of Statute Revisions in the Provinces of Upper Canada, Canada and Ontario 1763 - 1791 The Treaty of Paris, 1763, ceded the French possessions in North America to Great Britain. On October 7th of that year a Royal proclamation introduced the law of England, both civil and criminal, into the whole of the ceded territor\-, and formed the Eastern portion of it into the Province of Quebec. The Governor of the new colony received power and direction "so soon as the state and circumstances of the colony would admit thereof, to summon and call a General Assembly", but, until this was done, the Gover- nor and Council were invested with "authority to make such rules and regulations as should appear to be necessan.' for the peace, order and good government of the Province". In 1774 the Quebec Act (14 Geo. Ill, c. 83, Imp.) was passed, by which French law was re-introduced in civil matters, and the limits of the Province of Quebec were enlarged, so as to include the whole of the territor\- after- wards formed into Upper Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Reflections on the Woodhouse and Acc Legacy
    449 SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE WOODHOUSE AND ACC LEGACY Alan Clayton∗ In this summary of the symposium, Alan Clayton urges New Zealanders to recognize the uniqueness and importance of the original Woodhouse vision and the resulting Accident Compensation regime, but also encourages New Zealanders to look towards improving the system. Having placed the Woodhouse vision within its historical context, the author argues that it has stood the test of subsequent developments well but he criticises the failure to properly focus on accident prevention. While he notes a recent change in both political and administrative commitment to accident prevention, he believes that there is clearly still much work to be done. I INTRODUCTION This conference has brought together a diverse range of persons to consider a number of aspects of the origins and historical development of the New Zealand Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) scheme. It is an exercise whose utility has been enhanced by the participation – both directly as presenters and indirectly as audience interlocutors – of many of those who, in the words of the title of Dean Acheson's memoirs, were "present at the creation". In providing some form of commentary to these deliberations, I have chosen to follow the general contours of the conference's title, "Looking Back at Accident Compensation: Finding Lessons for the Future". First, "looking back". The ACC scheme represents one of the seminal events in a process of twelve decades of social policy experimentation in dealing with the consequences of personal trauma in society. In a process of foreshortening of perspective that often results from familiarity, most New Zealanders perhaps do not appreciate the uniqueness of, and boldness of vision that underpins, their everyday arrangements for dealing with personal injury.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario History Index from 1993 to 2016 Issue 1
    Ontario History Scholarly Journal of The Ontario Historical Society since 1899 INDEX 1993-2016 Issue 1 The Ontario Historical Society Established in 1888, the OHS is a non-profit corporation and registered charity; a non-government group bringing together people of all ages, all walks of life and all cultural backgrounds interested in preserving some aspect of Ontario's history. Learn more at www.ontariohistoricalsociety.ca This index was made possible with the financial support of the Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport, the Honourable Michael Chan, Minister, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, and the generous assistance of the Ontario Trillium Foundation. CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................... 3 Author Index ................................... 51 Books Reviewed Index .................... 112 Special Issues .................................. 160 Subject Index .................................. 172 To Go Back: Press ALT + (back arrow) (in downloaded PDF, not in browser) 2 Ontario History Scholarly Journal of The Ontario Historical Society since 1899 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1993-2016 Issue 1 The Ontario Historical Society Established in 1888, the OHS is a non-profit corporation and registered charity; a non-government group bringing together people of all ages, all walks of life and all cultural backgrounds interested in preserving some aspect of Ontario's history. Learn more at www.ontariohistoricalsociety.ca 3 To Go Back: Press ALT + (back arrow) (in downloaded PDF, not in browser) Go To Top (Contents) Ontario History, 1993-2016 Issue 1 Table of Contents Volume 85, 1: 1993 Editor: Jean Burnet 1. Cameron, Wendy, “’Till they get tidings from those who are gone…’ Thoms Sockett and Letters from Petworth Emigrants, 1832-1837.” 1-16 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Fthis Nuisance of Litigation
    in Essays in the History of Canadian Law, vol. II/ edited by David H. Flaherty. Toronto: Publ. for the Osgoode Society by University ofToronto Press, 1983. pp.418-491 'This Nuisance of Litigation' 419 8 spectives.3 The emphasis here will be the ideas about law, especially about the content of law and how to think about it, and about legal institutions. fThis Nuisance of Litigation': THE COMMON LAW The Origins of In the mid-nineteenth century a worker injured at work had only a very Workers' Compensation in Ontario small chance of receiving adequate compensation. Apart from the gener­ osity of an employer or family or compensation from a private insurance fund, the only prospect was a claim for damages in the courts. For all R.C.B. RISK practical purposes the common law governed this action. The claim might be made against a stranger; for example, a railway engineer might make a claim against another railway because its engineer carelessly ignored a signal and caused a collision at an intersection, or a carpenter injured in a fall from a scaffold that collapsed might make a claim against the contractor who built it. However, both the doctrine and the tYpical accidents and arrangements of work made a worker's employer the most likely defend­ When the province of Ontario enacted the Workmen's Compensation Act ant. The employer had a duty to take reasonable care to make the condi­ in 1914, the Industrial Banner, a labour paper, proclaimed it to be 'the tions of work safe. For example, claims might be made that the machinery, inauguration of real social legislation' and 'the most far-reaching legisla­ the work place, or the system of doing the work was not safe, or that the tion that has ever been enacted by any government in Canada in the other employees were not competent, all because reasonable care had not interests of the workers." This enthusiasm was justified.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Government Policy Towards Titular Honours Fkom Macdondd to Bennett
    Questions of Honoar: Canadian Government Policy Towards Titular Honours fkom Macdondd to Bennett by Christopher Pad McCreery A Thesis submitted to the Department of History in conformity with requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Queen's University Kingston, Ontario, Caaada September, 1999 Q Christopher Paul McCreery National birary Biblioth&quenationale du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographic Services services bibliagraphiques 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington OttawaON KIAON4 OIEawaON K1AON4 Canada Cariada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accorde melicence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive pennettant a la National Library of Canada to Bibliotheqe nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distriiute or sell reproduire, preter, distn'buer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette these sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/fih, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format ekctronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriete du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protege cette these. thesis nor substantial extracts fkom it Ni Ia these ai des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent &re imprimes reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation- Abstract This thesis examines the Canadian government's policy towards British tituiar honours and their bestowal upon residents of Canada, c. 1867-1935. In the following thesis, I will employ primary documents to undertake an original study of the early development of government policy towards titular honours. The evolution and development of the Canadian government's policy will be examined in the context of increasing Canadian autonomy within the British Empire/Commonwealth- The incidents that prompted the development of a Canadian made formal policy will also be discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Gowan Ferguson Collection PF179
    FINDING AID FOR Robert Gowan Ferguson collection PF179 User-Friendly Archival Software Tools provided by v1.1 Summary The "Robert Gowan Ferguson collection" Fonds contains: 0 Subgroups or Sous-fonds 0 Series 0 Sub-series 0 Sub-sub-series 0 Files 0 File parts 1 Items 0 Components Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................Biographical/Sketch/Administrative History .........................................................................................................................4 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................Scope and Content .........................................................................................................................4 .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Justice for Injured Workers: the Struggle Continues
    Journal of Law and Social Policy Volume 11 Article 3 1995 Justice for Injured Workers: The trS uggle Continues P. Biggin O. Buonastella M. Endicott J. McKinnon Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/jlsp Citation Information Biggin, P.; Buonastella, O.; Endicott, M.; and McKinnon, J.. "Justice for Injured Workers: The trS uggle Continues." Journal of Law and Social Policy 11. (1995): 41-77. https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/jlsp/vol11/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Law and Social Policy by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. JUSTICE FOR INJURED WORKERS: THE STRUGGLE CONTINUES P. BIGGIN, 0. BUONASTELLA, M. ENDICOTT, J. MCKINNON, S. SPANO, AND D. UBLANSKY* RtSUMt Dans cet article, on 6tudie bri~vement le r6le qu'ontjou6 les cliniquesjuridiques communautaires dans le mouvement des travailleurs accident6s. I1 d6crit l'6ro- sion des principes de base de l'indemnisation des travailleurs accident6s et le changement dans cette organisation qui met d6sormais l'accent sur la n~cessit6 de contenir les cofits au lieu d'indemniser les travailleurs, ce qui 6tait sa priorit6 traditionnelle. I1met en lumi~re le mythe de la crise de l'endettement du regime d'indemnisation des travailleurs accidentds et explore les effets de ce change- ment sur les prestations des travailleurs, sur la sant6 et la s6curit6 au travail et, ultimement, sur ]a viabilit6 d'un r6gime d'indemnisation des travailleurs acci- dent6s sans dgard la faute et administr6 par le gouvernement.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario History, 1973-1992 Abbott, Jolm R. 1986
    Ontario History, 1973-1992 AUTHOR INDEX. Abbott, Jolm R. 1986: "Accomplishing 'a man's task'; rural women teachers, male culture, and the school inspectorate in turn-of-the-century Ontario." 78,4: 818-880. 1987: "Etlmicity as a dynamic factor in the education of an industrializing town: the case of Sault Ste Marie, 1895-1914." 79,4: 827-852. 1990: "Guest editor's introduction: special issue on Northern Ontario." 82,1: 5-8. Abeele, Cynthia Comacchio. 1988: "'The mothers of the land must suffer': child and maternal welfare in rural and outpost Ontario, 1918-1940." SO,8: 188-205. Abray, L.J. 1988: Review of Badinter, Elisabeth, and De Garis, R., trans. L'Amour en plus: histoire de l'am.our :materneI. (XVlle-XX siecle): Mother love. 75,1: 106-107. Acheson, T.W. 1981: Review of McCalla, Douglas, The Upper Qmada trade 1834-1872: a study of the Bnclumans' business. 78,2: 126-127. Adams, Bradley. 1982: Review of Kealey, Gregory S. Toronto workers respond to industrial capitalism 1867-1892. 74,1: 54-58. 1982: Review of Gagan, David, Hopeful t.raveDers: families, land and soeiaI cbauge in mid-Vtctorian Peel County, Canada West. 74,8: 288-240. 1988: Review of Flaherty, David H. Essays in the history of Canadian Jaw. Vol. 2. 75,4: 486-488. 1984: Review of Bloomfield, Elizabeth, and Bloomfield, Gerald T., and McCaskell, Peter, Urban growth and local services: the development of Ontario m1micipalities to 1981. 76,2: 191-192. 47 Adams, Bradley, cont. 1984, with Roger Hall: "Toronto tributes•..and a few good books: a sesquicentennial review article." 76,3: 295.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Supre.V.E Court of Ontario, Appellate Division
    SIR WILLIAM RALPH MEREDITH, C.J.O. 555 SI WILLIAM RALPH ME EDITH, CJ.®. AN APPRECIATION BY THE HONOURABLE MR. TUSTIcE FERGUSON. Of the Supre.v.e Court of Ontario, Appellate Division. By the death of Sir William Meredith the Bench and the Bar of Canada have lost an outstanding jurist, and 0anada a loyal and devoted public servant, indeed one of her greatest ,sons. We who were associated with him on the Bench have lost a peerless leader, a sincere and helpful friend ; a friend that we respected for his learning, ability and wisdom, and loved for his kindly humanity of heart. As a boy I attended Upper Canada College. The old school stood then at the corner of Simcoe and King Streets, and the legislative buildings at the corner of Simcoe and Wellington. In those days I frequently crossed the block to listen to the debates, and it was in this way that I gained my first knowledge of my political leader and my future Chief. At that early time I formed the opinion that Sir William made known to the Government his views and opinions with as much candor and freedom as he could or would use in ;disclosing there. to his own political followers, and that while in so doing he was performing a great pub- lic service by forewarning the Government of pitfalls and dangers, he was not thereby helping his own fol- lowers to office. When in after years it was my good fortune to take a seat on the Bench beside Sir William, I found that regardless of whom it helped or hurt he still continued to declare his views of an argument or proposition with the same candor and freedom as had characterized - his political leadership.
    [Show full text]