DOCSLIB.ORG

4Th May 2017 Function Room, Theo Notaras Multicultural Centre, 180 London Circuit, Canberra City

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4Th May 2017 Function Room, Theo Notaras Multicultural Centre, 180 London Circuit, Canberra City 4th May 2017 Function Room, Theo Notaras Multicultural Centre, 180 London Circuit, Canberra City Canberra Conversations 1 CITIZENS’ JURIES: THE ANSWER TO IMPROVING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN THE ACT? Community engagement and participation in decision making has become a challenge for all democratic governments. Citizens’ juries, community panels and other forms of deliberative democracy are becoming increasingly popular across Australia. Are these forms of participatory engagement the answer to community discontent in the ACT? This Institute for Governance and Policy Analysis (IGPA) Canberra Conversation Panel Discussion will consider the use of deliberative democracy processes from the perspectives of a government sponsor, a researcher and a practitioner. They will draw on their extensive experience to reflect on the benefits of these processes, what situations they are best suited to, and how they can go wrong. The panel will go on to discuss how deliberative democracy processes like citizens’ juries might be used in the ACT. The event is jointly convened by Professorial Fellow Jon Stanhope AO and Adjunct Professor Dr Khalid Ahmed PSM in partnership with Deliberators without Borders, who provided funding support, and the International Association for Public Participation (IAP2) ACT Network. It will be in the form of a panel discussion facilitated by Kirsten Lawson and Jon Stanhope. Canberra Conversations 2 John Stanhope: The University of Canberra, and in that role that I’m pleased to be associated with, The Canberra Conversation is a series of seminars which the Institute is pleased to support. It would bring what we think are issues of interest to Canberra. I share this is a role with adjunct professor Khaled Ahmed. The topic as you know, today’s conversation is ‘Citizens Juries: The answer to improving community engagement in the ACT?’ Before introducing the panel today, I’d like to take this opportunity by acknowledging that we’re meeting on the land of Ngunnawal peoples. I would like to begin by paying respects, and I acknowledge the continuing contribution which Aboriginal people make in the life of our community. We are very privileged today to have a panel of people who are very experienced with the issue of community engagement, particularly in deliberative democracy with an experience in specific issue of citizen’s juries. Gail Failamb is the Director of Participation and Partnerships in the Department of Premier and Cabinet in South Australia. She is responsible for fostering an inclusive approach to policy-making, programme development and service delivery across the South Australian government. This includes the strategic implementation of the SA Government’s engagement policy: Better Together and oversight of YourSAy, a centralised online consultation hub for government and associated social media. Dr. Simon Niemeyer, a colleague from the university of Canberra, is an Australian Research Council Future Fellow at the Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance. His research covers the broad fields of deliberative democracy and environmental governance, particularly in respect to climate change. His focus is on the forces that shape public opinion and how this can be improved so that the expressed preference of the public better reflects their collective long-term interests. Emily Jenke is the Co-CEO of Democracy Co, an Adelaide-based company specialising in participative and deliberative practise. Democracy Co specialises in 3 key areas – supporting public servants with their adoption of these processes (including the politics that comes with this work); enabling stakeholders and partners to participate fully; as well as designing, facilitating and supporting citizens to contribute at their best. Our facilitator today is Kirsten Lawson, a woman that needs no introduction. I am sure she is well known to each of you. She leads Fairfax Media’s coverage of ACT politics. Kirsten is a long-time political reporter, she returned to the ACT parliament in early 2014, having covered ACT politics in the late 1990s, a time I am sure of few of you can still remember well. During the days of Kate Carnell’s chief minister ship, and federal politics in the Howard era. I’m joining the panel in a sort of fashion as ex-politician. Something that I know probably from time to time, I have failed some of your expectations in relation to consultation and Canberra Conversations 3 engagement. Be aware that I expose myself to future questions, in relation to some of the policies. Having said that I am aware about the cynicism in the Canberra and broader Australian community in relation to mutual trust, politics, and critical process in government of the extinguished politicians and governments to engage and to reflect. I think it’s a complex issue having experienced it in 10 years as chief minister. I always carry with me feeling or concern, that despite our best efforts as politicians and as governance and the determination or willingness and the wish to engage, but we never seem to satisfy our constituencies that we have done the job, or done our parts. This issue, whose time has come, an issue that should how do we as communities come together to discuss as a community to discuss the issues. I thank you very much for coming today. Kirsten Lawson: [crosstalk 00:05:24] I think we are going to give each of the panelists some time before I ask the questions. You can come up here, it might be easier. [crosstalk 00:05:41] Five minutes for each of the panelists, then some questions. Gail Fairlamb: Thank you very much for having me. Beautiful day in Canberra. When I first came to this country, I landed in Canberra so it’s kind of like coming home. I appreciate being here today. So, in my role as the Director of Strategic Engagement in South Australia in the Premier’s department. I’m responsible for the Reforming Democracy Policy. And that policy really came about in 2015. It is commitment lead by our Premier and holds the government to being more open to bringing community views and perspectives into, essentially, government decision-making. And the policy was co-designed by the Premier’s office and I think it represents a fairly ambitious and potentially courageous attempt to make systemic change across the public service. Opening government, involving people in decisions, but also involving people in the creation of new public value. So why are we doing this? Well, you know that across the world, we’ve seen trust in politicians, trust in government, trust in public servants, trust in the media, trust in all around civic institutions, declining. And why is that? I think that’s a really burning question. That’s not the question I’m going to answer here now. But it is a question that I think we can move, use things like deliberative democracy and open government to try and mediate some of the trust that is perhaps declining. So, Reforming Democracy trials a number of open innovation, open democratic innovations, and they build from them the principles which is our guide to community engagement. And I encourage you to hop online and have a look at those. Canberra Conversations 4 And deliberative democracy is one part of that policy and it’s a really important, part but it’s only, if you like, the flagship part of it. What’s also important for us is the public service in South Australia is to build capacity in the system. So it is all about public servants. So, when public servants engage the community, they are skilled, they understand, and do something about what they hear from communities. So, we have a number of different things that are covered by that part of that policy that include deliberative methods like citizens juries, like people’s budgeting where we put an amount of funding out and the community decides on how that should be allocated. They also have direct democracy like the YourSAy website where 60 000 people have signed up to participate in government decision making and all government agencies are required to host their engagements there. Country Cabinet where we take politicians out into regional areas to talk with communities. And we’re also doing open innovation challenges. We are bringing the community with platform that would enable open innovations, challenges to solve problems, and to generate new value for our community. So it’s really important to say that deliberative democracy is one part of that policy, it’s a very important part of it. And deliberative democracy and the Reforming Democracy Policy is an acknowledgement by the South Australian government that we need to be more open. We need to be more open about bringing people into decision-making, and the reason we need to do that is some of the problems we are solving are really complex. They’re difficult. They’re not easy to solve. If they were easy, we would have solved it already. So sharing that comes space with communities helps build empathy from the community about what government has to do, and also helps government understand what the community needs to do. And deliberative democracy is about taking community sentiments, which, you look across all social media platforms, you can get the sentiment that’s here, and sentiments there. When there aren’t engagement, we just consult in a very normal consultation way, you can get a broad range of sentiment, it doesn’t help government decide what the community would do if they have access to the information if they were given the opportunity to deliberate—the time, the space, access to the expert—that’s what deliberative democracy is about. It’s about the everyday citizen coming into a place where they are supported to give some policy advice to government.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Odysseus Labours
    Odysseus’ Labours A Rehabilitation and Recovery Guide for Those Who Have a Mental Illness and Their Carers Dr Paul Kauffman and Rupert Gerritsen Grasp with both hands Gift of time Spin dreams Wonderful dreams From the poem 'Trapped' by Mary Kirkland Wilson 2 Odysseus' Labours A Rehabilitation and Recovery Guide for Those Who Have a Mental Illness and Their Carers Dr Paul Kauffman and Rupert Gerritsen © Paul Kauffman and Rupert Gerritsen Published by: Mental Health Foundation Canberra, ACT 2008 3 About the Authors Dr Paul Kauffman is an Adjunct Professor at the National Institute for Governance at the University of Canberra who has administered national health and housing programs. He has a doctorate from the Australian National University and has also undertaken research on public policy issues in Canada and Europe. He has published books on Indigenous and multicultural affairs in four countries. He has also been a pro bono carer for many years. Rupert Gerritsen is Team Leader, Community Information and Education with the Mental Health Foundation. He hails from Western Australia where he worked with Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal young people, people with mental health problems, the homeless, and the community through drop-in centres, worker cooperatives, housing cooperatives, early intervention programs, outreach programs and youth employment programs. He has researched and published extensively in social issues, history, historical ethnography, historical linguistics, and archaeology, and has edited an international journal. The Mental Health Foundation delivers a range of high quality services for people with a mental illness and their carers, engages in mental health promotion and fosters consumer and carer participation.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Health Systems • Hospital Priority Setting
    Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management Volume 1 Issue 1 – 2006 The Journal of the Australian College of Health Service Executives • Improving health systems • Hospital priority setting • Measuring nursing turnover • Food security in remote communities • Cross-cultural alliances • Surgical response team leadership . and more This issue proudly sponsored by: ContEntS EdItorIalS aCHSE’s professional journal 6 Bill Lawrence the asia Pacific region 7 Mary Harris SPECIal FEature ArtIClE a Model Health System for australia Part 1: directions for reform of the australian health system 10 Andrew Podger VIEwPoInt ArtIClES Health Challenges in australia 17 Jo Martins a remote retail Workforce: agents for community food security? 24 Richard Sager and Roy Price rESEarch ArtICles and NotES Priority Setting of Hospital Services: a demonstration project involving clinicians and citizens in Hong Kong 30 Peter Yuen and Derek Gould the Thai-australian Health alliance: a case study of interorganisational collaboration 38 Prawit Taytiwat, John Fraser, David Briggs Methodological Challenges to researching nursing Turnover in new Zealand: a progress report of a national study 45 Nicola North and Frances Hughes ManagEMEnt PraCtICE leadership of the Combined australian Surgical Team – aCEH (CaSTA) in operation Tsunami assist: disaster medicine in action 52 Sophie York In ProFIlE 59 Kate Carnell Q and a’S attributes, Education and Competencies required to be a Success in Health Management 62 Nine experienced health managers and educators address this question
    [Show full text]
  • You Can't Be What You Can't See— Women
    Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory 49th Presiding Officers and Clerks Conference Wellington, New Zealand 8-13 July 2018 You can’t be what you can’t see— Women in the Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory Paper to be presented by Joy Burch, MLA, Speaker of the Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory Page 1 of 10 ‘Any way you look at it there are many, many women who are capable of that job of leadership and making an impact at every level of government and I think we should see more”1 “Women in politics do make a difference and they can change people’s perceptions of politics – they also change the structural discrimination of old-style political systems and parliamentary conventions”2 1 Rosemary Follett, ‘Rosemary Follett and Kate Carnell reunited to sight sexism in politics’ Canberra Times 7th March 2015. 2 Katy Gallagher, ACT Chief Minister, katygallagher.net/blog blog post, 1st October 2014. Page 2 of 10 Introduction Women have played an important and prominent role in the Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory since its establishment in 1989. The ACT was the first state or territory to have a woman as its Head of Government. In the Second Assembly, the positions of Speaker, Chief Minister and Leader of the Opposition were all held by women. Perhaps most significantly, at the Territory election for the Ninth Assembly in 2016, thirteen women were elected to the Assembly. It was the first time in Australian history that a majority of women had been elected to a parliament and one of the first jurisdictions in the world to have done so.3 It was also notable that the voters of the ACT returned this result even though only 36 percent of the total 140 candidates that stood for election were women.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment To: Review of National Aged Care Quality Regulatory Processes – Public Submissions
    2017 23 July 2017 Attachment to: Review of National Aged Care Quality Regulatory Processes – Public Submissions We thank the Department of Health for the opportunity to supply an attachment, which contains a more in depth assessment of the aged care regulatory process. We have been acutely aware of its many failures and have been strong critics over the years in our submissions to inquiries, reviews and consultations. What has been revealed at Oakden in South Australia confirms our assessments. Serious problems: In our view the policies adopted were misconceived when they were introduced, ignored available evidence they were aware of, and were driven by ideological beliefs that were unsuited to this sector. The failure to confront the underlying problems has been due to an inability of those, who had invested their lives in this, to confront the flaws in the thinking that drove the ideology. That is now unravelling and this is reflected in the public’s disenchantment with a political process that has been run like a competitive marketplace. Finding a better way: Our analysis and efforts are not recriminatory but directed to understanding what has happened and opening debate that will lead to a way out of this system into one that is part of a cohesive community that is involved and in control of itself. This must take account of the nature of care and in doing so build a system that is underpinned by an understanding of human nature and the value of building social selves through responsible citizenship within society. We have been forced to recognise the benefits of this for other cultures (eg.
    [Show full text]
  • Member Biographies Eighth Assembly
    LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY MEMBERS OF THE EIGHTH ASSEMBLY NOVEMBER 2012-OCTOBER 2016 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY EIGHTH ASSEMBLY – LIST OF MEMBERS Historical document published in November 2012 which includes biographical information provided by members at the commencement of the Eighth Assembly, changes to ministerial and shadow ministerial responsibilities from November 2012- October 2016 have been updated within the following table. NAME ELECTORATE PARTY Mr Andrew Barr Molonglo Australian Labor Party Chief Minister (11/12/2014-31/10/2016) Deputy Chief Minister (7/11/2012-10/12/2014) Minister for Community Services (9/11/2012-6/7/2014) Minister for Economic Development (9/11/2012-31/10/2016) Minister for Housing (7/7/2014-20/1/2015) Minister for Sport and Recreation (9/11/2012-6/7/2014) Minister for Urban Renewal (21/1/2015-31/10/2016) Minister for Tourism and Events (9/11/2012-31/10/2016) Treasurer (9/11/2012-31/10/2016) Ms Yvette Berry Ginninderra Australian Labor Party Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs (21/1/2015-22/1/2016) Minister for Community Services (21/1/2015-22/1/2016) Minister for Housing (21/1/2015-22/1/2016) Minister for Housing, Community Services and Social Inclusion (22/1/2016-31/10/2016) Minister for Multicultural Affairs (21/1/2015-22/1/2016) Minister for Multicultural and Youth Affairs (22/1/2016- 31/10/2016) Minister for Sport and Recreation (22/1/2016-31/10/2016) Minister for Women (21/1/2015-31/10/2016) Minister assisting the
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter April 2014
    Families and Friend s for Drug Law Reform ( ACT) Inc Committed to preventing tragedy that arises from illicit drug use PO Box 4736 HIGGINS ACT 2615 N E WSLETTER Tel: 02 62542961 April, Email: [email protected] 2014 Web: www.ffdlr.org.au ISSN 1444-200 Join us. supplanted by Zed Seselja in preselection for an ACT Senate seat. Before moving to the Senate he had been NO APRIL MEETING the ACT Chief Minister. He fears that unless the local party distinguishes itself from an unpopular Commonwealth government it will not stand a chance of ever forming government again in this territory. “I do not NEXT MEETING rejoice in the title Last Liberal Chief Minister of the ACT” Thursday 29th May 2014 Humphries wrote in The Canberra Times on 28th March. 7.30pm “They must,” he added, “also be demonstrably a different St Ninian’s Uniting Church hall, product to their national cousins.” Kate Carnell, he observed, “understood this” and reaped the reward. She cnr Mouat and Brigalow Sts, was “the only Liberal leader ever to win elections here in LYNEHAM the quarter century of self-government.” Humphries Meetings are followed by recalls that “she fought often, and hard, with John refreshments and time for a chat. Howard. It was right to stand up for the city when its interests were threatened, but it was also good politics.” In this Issue Significantly, the one example that Humphries gives is Liberal voices in favour of Drug Law Reform drug law reform, an issue “that Liberal governments elsewhere ran a mile from, but which struck a chord with 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf, 80.26 KB
    A I A T S I S Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Native Titles Research Unit GPO Box 553 Canberra ACT 2601 Tel 06 246 1153 Fax 06 249 1046 Email [email protected] See also : the Native Title Research Unit page NATIVE TITLE NEWSLETTER No. 3/97 June 1997 Go to Table of Contents STOP PRESS As we go to press the Federal Government has released the draft legislation which will amend the Native Title Act and incorporate its response to the Wik decision. Called The Native Title Amendment Bill 1997. Working draft. It is available from Senator Minchin's office at Parliament House Canberra. Phone: (06) 277 7130. It will also be loaded on the Dept. of Prime Minister and Cabinet's web site at www.nla.gov.au/pmc/pmchome.html. AIATSIS has two current projects relating to native title being undertaken by consultants: Jon Stanhope and Chris Fabricius, legal consultants, have been contracted to prepare a manual for general use, covering each Australian jurisdiction, of legislation relevant to native title and heritage. The manual will contain summaries of relevant legislation. They may be contacted at the Institute on telephones (06) 246 1160 or 246 1163 or fax (06) 249 7714, and would be pleased to discuss any aspect of the project with anyone interested. Lee Godden and Shaunnagh Dorsett from the Faculty of Law, Griffith University are preparing a publication on overseas precedents relating to native title. Call the NTRU if you would like to discuss any aspects of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2008-2009
    Annual Report 2008-2009 COMMITTED TO THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE REGION Affiliated with THE CANBERRA BUSINESS COUNCIL GRATEFULLY ACKNOWLEDGES ITS PRINCIPAL MEMBERS PRINCIPAL MEMBERS Annual Report 2008-2009 Affiliated with Canberra Business Council Annual Report Canberra Business Council Limited VISION: AN ORGANISATION THAT IS RESPECTED FOR THE QUALITY AND IMPACT OF ITS CONTRIBUTION TO THE CAPITAL REGION. MISSION: PROVIDE BUSINESS LEADERSHIP IN THE PROMOTION OF ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OF THE CAPITAL REGION BOARD OF DIRECTORS Criag Sloan: Chair Prof John Howard Tim Overall KPMG UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA QUEANBEYAN CITY COUNCIL Brand Hoff: Vice Chair Glenn Keys Kristine Reithmiller NICTA ASPEN MEDICAL KMR CONSULTING Michael Capezio David Marshall AUSTRALIAN HOTELS TALKFORCE CONSULTANTS ASSOCIATION & TRAINERS Hugh Chalmers Michelle Melbourne John Butt: Company Secretary MEYER VANDENBERG INTELLEDOX NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER John Hindmarsh Stephen O’Brien Chris Faulks: CEO HINDMARSH NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER CANBERRA BUSINESS COUNCIL Canberra Business Council Annual Report COMMITTEE MEMBERS AS AT 30 JUNE 09 Colin Alexander OAM: Canberra Investment Corporation Limited John Smeeth: National Australia Bank Dale Budd: Dale Budd & Associates Pty Ltd Mary-Anne Waldren: ASF Limited Phillip Butler: Australian Institute of Company Directors Alison Walker-Kaye: National Capital Authority Andy Castle: ActivIdentity Sue Whelan: CRDB Hugh Chalmers: Meyer Vandenberg Todd Wills: PricewaterhouseCoopers Ian Davis: National Publishers James Willson: CRE8IVE
    [Show full text]
  • Almost 30Years:The Story So Far Legislative Assembly
    LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY ALMOST 30 YEARS: THE STORY SO FAR LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE ACT AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2018 Table of Contents Almost 30 Years: The story so far ................................................................................................... 1 Legislative Assembly Firsts .............................................................................................................. 1 Speakers .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Chief Ministers ................................................................................................................................ 2 Deputy Chief Ministers ................................................................................................................... 2 Ministers ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Leaders of the Opposition ............................................................................................................... 6 Members ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Women in Parliament ..................................................................................................................... 8 Legislation ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Jon Stanhope 1 July 2014
    ACT Human Rights Act-Tenth Anniversary Professor Hilary Charlesworth Dr Helen Watchirs Distinguished guests Ladies and Gentlemen I acknowledge the Nugunnawal people, the traditional owners of the land we are gathered on today. I extend to them my respects and acknowledge their continuing contribution to the life of Canberra. I thank Ms Violet Sheldon for her welcome to country. I thank Professor Charlesworth and Dr Watchirs for the invitation to be a part of this conference celebrating the tenth anniversary of the passage of the Human Rights Act - Australia’s first Bill of Rights. Having accepted the invitation, however, I wasn’t quite sure what I could usefully talk about. But in discussion with Hilary she suggested it might be interesting to know whether there were any particular factors that led to the decision to enact the ACT Human Rights Act. Was there a combination of circumstances that led to us proceeding with the Human Rights Act that might by a process of elimination, help in understanding why there had not been action elsewhere in Australia. As you know Victoria is the only other Australian jurisdiction to have followed the ACT's lead and enacted similar legislation. I am sure, like me, many of you will have wondered why it is that none of the other States have taken up the issue and indeed why there has been so little appetite federally for a national Bill of Rights. It is something I think about often. It occupied my thinking most particularly in that time in recent history, (though how long ago it now sometimes feels), when we had , for almost a decade, wall to wall Labor Governments, including six years of a Federal Labor Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Representation of Women in Australian Parliaments 2014 9 July
    RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, 2014–15 9 JULY 2014 Representation of women in Australian parliaments 2014 Dr Joy McCann and Janet Wilson Politics and Public Administration Executive summary • Across Australia women continue to be significantly under-represented in parliament and executive government, comprising less than one-third of all parliamentarians and one-fifth of all ministers. • Internationally, Australia’s ranking for women in national government continues to decline when compared with other countries. • The representation of women in Australia’s parliaments hovers around the ‘critical mass’ of 30 per cent regarded by the United Nations as the minimum level necessary for women to influence decision-making in parliament. • There is no consensus amongst researchers in the field as to why women continue to be under-represented in Australia’s system of parliamentary democracy, although a number of factors contribute to the gender imbalance. This paper includes discussion of some of the structural, social and cultural factors influencing women’s representation including the type of electoral system, the culture of political parties, and the nature of politics and the parliamentary environment in Australia. • This updated paper draws on recent data and research to discuss trends and issues relating to women in Australian parliaments within an international context. It includes data on women in leadership and ministry positions, on committees and as candidates in Commonwealth elections. Whilst the focus is on the Commonwealth Parliament, the paper includes comparative information about women in state and territory parliaments. • The issue of gender diversity is also discussed within the broader context of women in leadership and executive decision-making roles in Australia including local government, government boards and in the corporate sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Informing the Euthanasia Debate: Perceptions of Australian Politicians
    1368 UNSW Law Journal Volume 41(4) INFORMING THE EUTHANASIA DEBATE: PERCEPTIONS OF AUSTRALIAN POLITICIANS ANDREW MCGEE,* KELLY PURSER,** CHRISTOPHER STACKPOOLE,*** BEN WHITE,**** LINDY WILLMOTT***** AND JULIET DAVIS****** In the debate on euthanasia or assisted dying, many different arguments have been advanced either for or against legal reform in the academic literature, and much contemporary academic research seeks to engage with these arguments. However, very little research has been undertaken to track the arguments that are being advanced by politicians when Bills proposing reform are debated in Parliament. Politicians will ultimately decide whether legislative reform will proceed and, if so, in what form. It is therefore essential to know what arguments the politicians are advancing in support of or against legal reform so that these arguments can be assessed and scrutinised. This article seeks to fill this gap by collecting, synthesising and mapping the pro- and anti-euthanasia and assisted dying arguments advanced by Australian politicians, starting from the time the first ever euthanasia Bill was introduced. I INTRODUCTION Euthanasia attracts continued media, societal and political attention.1 In particular, voluntary active euthanasia (‘VAE’) and physician-assisted suicide * BA (Hons) (Lancaster), LLB (Hons) (QUT), LLM (QUT), PhD (Essex); Senior Lecturer, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology. ** BA/LLB (Hons) (UNE), PhD (UNE); Senior Lecturer, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology. *** LLB/BBus (Hons) (QUT), BCL (Oxford). **** LLB (Hons) (QUT), DPhil (Oxford), Professor, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology. ***** BCom (UQ), LLB (Hons) (UQ), LLM (Cambridge), PhD (QUT); Professor, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology.
    [Show full text]