DOCSLIB.ORG

Republican River Basin-Wide Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Republican River Basin-Wide Plan Republican River Basin-Wide Plan Jointly developed by the Upper Republican, Middle Republican, Lower-Republican, and Tri-Basin Natural Resources Districts and the Nebraska Department of Natural Resources 2019 Republican River Basin-Wide Plan Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 4 Effective Date and Time Frame of the Plan ............................................................................................................... 4 Authority ................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Background, Purpose, and Intent .................................................................................................................................. 5 Vision Statement for the Plan ........................................................................................................................ 5 Mission Statement for the Plan ..................................................................................................................... 5 Integrated Management Plans and Basin-Wide Plan in the Basin ................................................................... 6 Planning Process .................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Responsibilities and Authorities of NeDNR and NRDs .......................................................................................12 2. Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................................. 13 List of Goals ..........................................................................................................................................................................14 Management Activities to Achieve Goals and Objectives ................................................................................14 3. Monitoring ............................................................................................................................. 44 Plan Schedule and Management Actions ................................................................................................................44 Reporting ..............................................................................................................................................................................45 Annual Meeting ..................................................................................................................................................................47 Measurable Hydrologic Objectives .............................................................................................................................48 Five-Year Technical Analysis ..........................................................................................................................................48 Modifications to the Plan ...............................................................................................................................................49 Report to the Legislature ................................................................................................................................................50 4. Plan Implementation Schedule ............................................................................................ 51 Measurable Hydrologic Objectives .............................................................................................................................53 5. Funding .................................................................................................................................. 63 Guidelines .............................................................................................................................................................................63 Limitations ............................................................................................................................................................................63 6. Plan Area ................................................................................................................................ 64 7. Glossary .................................................................................................................................. 65 Appendix A. Local Hydrology .................................................................................................... 70 Basic Hydrological Principles of the Basin ...............................................................................................................70 Precipitation .........................................................................................................................................................................72 Surface Water Supplies....................................................................................................................................................73 Groundwater Supplies .....................................................................................................................................................76 Human Activities Relating to Basin Hydrology ......................................................................................................80 Appendix B. Data and Information Used During Plan Development .................................... 87 Hydrologic Considerations ............................................................................................................................................87 Studies, Reports, and Presentations ...........................................................................................................................88 Page 2 of 141 Republican River Basin-Wide Plan Other .......................................................................................................................................................................................88 Appendix C. Plan Development ................................................................................................. 90 Members of the Stakeholder Advisory Committee ..............................................................................................90 Plan Development Meeting Schedule .......................................................................................................................90 Stakeholder Themes .........................................................................................................................................................91 Appendix D. Relevant History of Groundwater and Surface Water Management .............. 93 Era of Independent Management of Groundwater and Surface Water .......................................................93 Era of Water Planning and Policy Development ...................................................................................................94 Era of Collaborative Water Planning Process Implementation ........................................................................96 Appendix E. Procedures for Addressing Conflicts Resulting from Implementation of the Republican River Basin-Wide Plan ..................................................................... 99 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................................................................99 Exclusions ........................................................................................................................................................................... 100 Overview ............................................................................................................................................................................. 100 Procedures ......................................................................................................................................................................... 100 Appendix F. Watershed Management Presentation Materials............................................. 103 Appendix G. Water Market Summary ..................................................................................... 127 Moving Forward .............................................................................................................................................................. 127 Questions to Guide Initial Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 128 The Prospect of a Pilot Program ............................................................................................................................... 129 Other Resources .............................................................................................................................................................. 129 Appendix H. 2018-2022 Allocation Summary .......................................................................................... 130 Groundwater Allocations, Summarized ................................................................................................................. 130 NRD Terminology, Defined ........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Streamflow Depletion Investigations in the Republican River Basin: Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas
    J. ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, Vol. 27(3) 251-263, 1999 STREAMFLOW DEPLETION INVESTIGATIONS IN THE REPUBLICAN RIVER BASIN: COLORADO, NEBRASKA, AND KANSAS JOZSEF SZILAGYI University of Nebraska–Lincoln ABSTRACT Water is a critical resource in the Great Plains. This study examines the changes in long-term mean annual streamflow in the Republican River basin. In the past decades this basin, shared by three states, Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas, displayed decreased streamflow volumes as the river enters Kansas across the Nebraska-Kansas border compared to values preceding the 1950s. A recent lawsuit filed by Kansas challenges water appropriations in Nebraska. More than half of the source area for this water, however, lies outside of Nebraska. Today a higher percentage of the annual flow is generated within Nebraska (i.e., 75% of the observed mean annual stream- flow at the NE-KS border) than before the 1950s (i.e., 66% of the observed mean annual streamflow) indicating annual streamflow has decreased more dramatically outside of Nebraska than within the state in the past fifty years. INTRODUCTION The Republican River basin’s 64,796 km2 drainage area is shared by three states: Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas (see Figure 1). Nebraska has the largest single share of the drainage area, 25,154 km2 (39% of total); Colorado can claim about 20,000 km2 (31%), while the rest, about 19,583 km2 (30%), belongs to Kansas [1], from which about 12,800 km2 (20%) lies upstream of Hardy, near the Nebraska-Kansas border. Exact figures for the contributing drainage areas (portions of the drainage areas that actually contribute water to the stream) are hard to obtain because these areas in the headwater sections of the basin have been shrinking constantly in the past fifty years.
    [Show full text]
  • Norton Lake (Keith Sebelius Lake) Water Quality Impairment: Eutrophication Bundled with Ph and Dissolved Oxygen
    UPPER REPUBLICAN RIVER BASIN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD Water Body: Norton Lake (Keith Sebelius Lake) Water Quality Impairment: Eutrophication bundled with pH and Dissolved Oxygen Subbasin: Prairie Dog Counties: Decatur, Graham, Norton, Rawlins, Sheridan, and Thomas HUC 8: 10250015 HUC 11 (HUC 14): 010 (010, 020, 030, 040, 050, 060, 070) (Figure 1) 020 (010, 020, 030, 040, 050, 060, 070) Ecoregion: Western High Plains, Flat to Rolling Cropland (25d) Central Great Plains, Rolling Plains and Breaks (27b) Drainage Area: Approximately 687 square miles Conservation Pool: Area = 2,055 acres Watershed Area: Lake Surface Area = 214:1 Maximum Depth = 12.0 meters (39.4 feet) Mean Depth = 4.9 meters (16 feet) Retention Time = 0.61 years (7.3 months) Designated Uses: Primary and Secondary Contact Recreation; Expected Aquatic Life Support, Drinking Water, Food Procurement, Industrial Water Supply, Irrigation Authority: Federal (U.S. Bureau of Reclamation), State (Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks) 2002 303(d) Listing: Upper Republican River Basin Lakes Impaired Use: All uses are impaired to a degree by eutrophication Water Quality Standard: Nutrients - Narrative: The introduction of plant nutrients into streams, lakes, or wetlands from artificial sources shall be controlled to prevent the accelerated succession or replacement of aquatic biota or the production of undesirable quantities or kinds of aquatic life. (KAR 28-16-28e(c)(2)(B)). The introduction of plant nutrients into surface waters designated for primary or secondary contact recreational use shall be controlled to 1 prevent the development of objectionable concentrations of algae or algal by-products or nuisance growths of submersed, floating, or emergent aquatic vegetation.
    [Show full text]
  • COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD 102 Columbine Building 1845 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203
    / COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD 102 Columbine Building 1845 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 M E M O R A N D U M SUBJECT: Status of Flood Plain Information Program in Colorado June 1974 Increasing recognition of the importance of Colorado's flood plains is occurring. Colorado Revised Statutes 1963, as amended, Section 149-1-11(4), authorizes the Colorado Water Conservation Board to designate and approve storm or flood water runoff channels and to make such designations available to legis­ lative bodies of local jurisdictions. In addition to assisting local governmental entities in obtaining basic flood plain data, the Board is actively engaged in assisting local governments in developing and adopting effective flood plain ordinances and related land use regulations. The Board has the responsibility of coordinating all flood related studies within the state of Colorado, which includes scheduling the Flood Plain Information Studies conducted by federal agencies, and can provide direct financial assistance for a study within Colorado. The intent is that, with these data outlining the flood plains, local entities can control the use of these flood plains and thereby prevent developments within the paths of future floods. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Soil Conservation Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, have specific authorities for the preparation of detailed flood plain reports. House Bill 1041, relating to the use of land, (Article 7, Chapter 106, CRS 1963, as amended) provides, "Flood­ plains shall be administered so as to minimize significant hazards to public health and safety or to property. Open space activities shall be encouraged in the floodplains." Concerning the designation and use of flood plains, the Board is charged with responsibilities under the Act as follows: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Classification of Riparian Wetland Plant Associations of Colorado a Users Guide to the Classification Project
    A Classification of Riparian Wetland Plant Associations of Colorado A Users Guide to the Classification Project September 1, 1999 By Gwen Kittel, Erika VanWie, Mary Damm, Reneé Rondeau Steve Kettler, Amy McMullen and John Sanderson Clockwise from top: Conejos River, Conejos County, Populus angustifolia-Picea pungens/Alnus incana Riparian Woodland Flattop Wilderness, Garfield County, Carex aquatilis Riparian Herbaceous Vegetation South Platte River, Logan County, Populus deltoides/Carex lanuginosa Riparian Woodland California Park, Routt County, Salix boothii/Mesic Graminoids Riparian Shrubland Joe Wright Creek, Larimer County, Abies lasiocarpa-Picea engelmannii/Alnus incana Riparian Forest Dolores River, San Miguel County, Forestiera pubescens Riparian Shrubland Center Photo San Luis Valley, Saguache County, Juncus balticus Riparian Herbaceous Vegetation (Photography by Gwen Kittel) 2 Prepared by: Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Bldg. Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 [email protected] This report should be cited as follows: Kittel, Gwen, Erika VanWie, Mary Damm, Reneé Rondeau, Steve Kettler, Amy McMullen, and John Sanderson. 1999. A Classification of Riparian Wetland Plant Associations of Colorado: User Guide to the Classification Project. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO. 80523 For more information please contact: Colorado Natural Heritage Program, 254 General Service Building, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523. (970)
    [Show full text]
  • Republican River Valley and Adjacent Areas, Nebraska
    A, Economic Geology, 97 B, Descriptive Geology 119 M, General Hydrograpmc investigations, 26 (0, Underground Waters, 72 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES I>. WALOOTT, DIKECTOR GEOLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES OF THE REPUBLICAN RIVER VALLEY AND ADJACENT AREAS, NEBRASKA G. E. CONDRA -FERTY OF -LOGICAL Sl'». WASHINGTON (GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1907 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction __'___________________________________ 7 Geography _____________________________________ 8 Topography______________________.._ 8 Drainage _____________________________.____ 8 Climate "_________________________ _ _________ ._..__ 9 Temperature_______l_____________________ 9 Rainfall _____________________________________ 9 Winds_____________________________________ 10 Descriptive geology ________________________________ 10 General relations _____ _________ ___ ________ 10 Structure____________________________ 11 Description of the rocks____ ______________________ 11 Carboniferous system_______________________ 11 Cretaceous system.__________________________ 12 Dakota formation_________________________ 12 Character and thickness______________ 12 Distribution_________________ 13 Benton group________________________ 13 Members represented________________ 13 Graneros shale_ ________________________ 14 Character and thickness_________________ 14 Exposures,_________ _______ _-_________ 14 Greenhorn limestone_____________________ 14 Character and thickness___________________ 14 Fossils_________________________ 16 Carlile shale______.___________________
    [Show full text]
  • 1 UPPER REPUBLICAN BASIN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD Waterbody/Assessment Unit: Arikaree River Water Quality Impairment: Sulfate 1
    UPPER REPUBLICAN BASIN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD Waterbody/Assessment Unit: Arikaree River Water Quality Impairment: Sulfate 1. INTRODUCTION AND PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Subbasin: Arikaree River County: Cheyenne HUC 8: (In Kansas) 10250001 HUC 11 (HUC 14s): (In Kansas) 080 (030, 040 and 050) Drainage Area: 37 square miles in Kansas 1725 square miles total above sampling station Main Stem Segment: WQLS: 1 (Arikaree River) starting at the Kansas-Nebraska state line and traveling upstream through northwest Cheyenne County to the Kansas-Colorado state line (Figure 1). Tributaries: All tributaries located in Colorado, segment numbers unknown Horse Creek Sand Creek Gordon Creek Currie Creek Dugout Creek Hell Creek North Fork Arikaree River Designated Uses: Special Aquatic Life Support, Primary Contact Recreation (C), Domestic Water Supply; Food Procurement; Ground Water Recharge; Industrial Water Supply Use; Irrigation Use; Livestock Watering Use for Kansas Segment. Impaired Use: Domestic Water Supply Water Quality Standard: Sulfate: 250 mg/l for Domestic Water Supply (KAR 28-16-28e(c) (3) (A)) 1 (Figure 1) 2. CURRENT WATER QUALITY CONDITION AND DESIRED ENDPOINT Level of Support for Designated Use under 2004 303(d): Not Supporting Domestic Water Supply Monitoring Sites: Station 226 at Haigler, NE. Period of Record Used: 1986-2005 for Station 226 (Figure 2, Table 1) 2 Sulfate Concentration at SC226 900 800 700 600 500 mg/L 400 300 200 100 0 Jul-90 Jul-92 Jul-94 Jul-96 Jul-98 Jul-99 Apr-91 Apr-93 Apr-95 Apr-97 Apr-00 Oct-91 Oct-93 Oct-95 Oct-97 Oct-00 Jun-91 Jun-93 Jun-95 Jun-97 Jan-92 Jan-94 Aug-91 Aug-93 Aug-97 Mar-86 Mar-90 Feb-91 Dec-91 Mar-92 Nov-92 Feb-93 Mar-94 Nov-94 Feb-95 Mar-96 Nov-96 Feb-97 Nov-98 Mar-99 Nov-99 Nov-99 Feb-00 Mar-01 Mar-03 Sep-90 Sep-92 Sep-94 Sep-96 Sep-98 Sep-99 Sep-01 Sep-03 May-86 May-87 May-88 May-89 May-90 May-92 May-94 May-96 May-98 May-99 May-01 May-03 (Figure 2-Line indicates domestic water supply criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • KANSAS Rapid Watershed Assessment
    KANSAS Rapid Watershed Assessment Prairie Dog Creek Watershed Hydrologic Unit Code – 10250015 December 2007 Produced by: U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service 760 South Broadway Salina, Kansas 67401 Kansas Department of Health and Environment Bureau of Water Watershed Management Section 1000 S.W. Jackson Topeka, Kansas 66612 Prairie Dog Creek – 10250015 DECEMBER 2007 "The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer." 2 Prairie Dog Creek – 10250015 DECEMBER 2007 Resource Profile Contents 1.0 Purpose 2.0 Introduction 3.0 Physical Description 3.1 Common Resource Area Map 3.2 Precipitation Map 3.3 Land Use and Land Cover Distribution Map 3.3.1
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado 1 !( 1 27 S.P
    # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ## # # # ## ## # # ## # # # # 1 2 3 4 5 # 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) " 8 Muddy !a Ik ") 24 6 ") !(KÂ ) )¬ !( LA" RAMIE KIMBALL GARDEN 1 ") I¸ 6 Medicine Bow !` Lod Centennial 4 gep National Federal ole !(! Kimball 9 Lake McConaughy CARBON Forest I§ 9 CHEYENNE 11 Cr Bushnell 12 1 Potter CURT GOWDY eek !( 11 ") 15 ") ") Riverside !( LARAMIE !( ") Ik ") !( ) 8 " Colorado 1 !( 1 27 S.P. Pine 2 Ij Cr Medicine Bow ") 2 !a KÂ 6 .R. 3 12 2 7 9 ) Flaming Gorge eek .R ") " National 34 U.P !( Burns Bluffs ") 5 National SWEETWATER Encampment !( 10 7 KEITH 40 Forest !( Red Buttes !( 4 Egbert ") 8 Sidney 10 Lodgepole Recreation Area 796 !( 2 DEUEL ") ) " !( 6 ") ") 3 Albany ") 9 2 A !( 6 ) R 6 Ik !a " 1 3 3 9 n i 27 2 6 ver CHEYENNE ") Brule K G 10 lio ") 4 ") Big Springs Jct. 9 Ik ") ) " Chappell 14 rmil 17 ") 3 2 !( !( e 4 ") V Woods Landing S !a ") N !( Ik ) !( 8 15 8 " ") !a " ) # ALBANY 3 3 3 5 7 Big Springs 2 ") ") !( ") 4 3 !( k 11 6 2 ") 6 WYOMING e MI Medicine Bow 4 Carpenter Barton ") !( Baggs Dixon !( 6 RA I« 10 ) Tie Siding " Cre Savery !( !( !( National ") 6 O 7 9 B !( 4 Forest 8 9 5 4 5 Flaming UTAH 2 5 15 9 A Dutch John Mountain ") Y I¸11 Gorge !( !( 4 NEBRASKA !( Res. Powder Home 2 K NE C ! ! !( ! W o 7 ll Little Enca WYOMING 3 tt Tal She !( Wash Slater on ! ") S amant Ovid 4 ! Snake River mpmen wo ! es L 3 !( ! ! o ! Gr Midd ittle d 8 ! JULESBURG een Creek Powder Wash le t !( Hereford !( C ! 8 k NORTHGATE 4 Peetz re Sedgwick ! reek W K Virginia Jumbo Lake e ! ! ! C For ing k !( ") 1 il 7 RA Creek lo CANYON k Larami !( Dale B I§ w Big Creek e F re o 2 9 8 Creek 9 C x DAGGETT ou For Ce Lakes e 7 ") B A eek So k NATURE TRAIL r e lde d 7 r l k a 0 k I« 1 C mil o r 17 mon r PERKINS r C uc 293 Pawnee Rive ee 9 R e r outh ver iv ") Carr 1 eek St Poudre er Rockport 9 7 Dry S Ri 4 Cr SENTINAL !( National 22 ek La HAMILTON RESERVOIR/ !( k 6 NE A G re Halligan Res.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado 1 (! 1 27 Y S.P
    # # # # # # # # # ######## # # ## # # # ## # # # # # 1 2 3 4 5 # 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) " 8 Muddy !a Ik ") 24 6 ") (!KÂ ) )¬ (! LARAMIE" KIMBALL GARDEN 1 ") I¸ 6 Medicine Bow !` Lodg Centennial 4 ep National Federal ole (! 9 Lake McConaughy CARBON Forest I§ Kimball 9 CHEYENNE 11 C 12 1 Potter CURT GOWDY reek Bushnell (! 11 ") 15 ") ") Riverside (! LARAMIE ! ") Ik ( ") (! ) " Colorado 1 8 (! 1 27 Y S.P. ") Pine !a 2 Ij Cree Medicine Bow 2 KÂ 6 .R. 3 12 2 7 9 ) Flaming Gorge R ") " National 34 .P. (! Burns Bluffs k U ") 10 5 National SWEETWATER Encampment (! 7 KEITH 40 Forest (! Red Buttes (! 4 Egbert ") 8 Sidney 10 Lodgepole Recreation Area 796 (! DEUEL ") ) " ") 2 ! 6 ") 3 ( Albany ") 9 2 A (! 6 9 ) River 27 6 Ik !a " 1 2 3 6 3 CHEYENNE ") Brule K ") on ") G 4 10 Big Springs Jct. 9 lli ") ) Ik " ") 3 Chappell 2 14 (! (! 17 4 ") Vermi S Woods Landing ") !a N (! Ik ) ! 8 15 8 " ") ) ( " !a # ALBANY 3 3 ^! 5 7 2 3 ") ( Big Springs ") ") (! 4 3 (! 11 6 2 ek ") 6 WYOMING MI Dixon Medicine Bow 4 Carpenter Barton ") (! (! 6 RA I« 10 ) Baggs Tie Siding " Cre Savery (! ! (! National ") ( 6 O 7 9 B (! 4 Forest 8 9 5 4 5 Flaming UTAH 2 5 15 9 A Dutch John Mountain ") Y I¸11 Gorge (! 4 NEBRASKA (! (! Powder K Res. ^ Home tonwo 2 ^ NE t o o ! C d ! ell h Little En (! WYOMING 3 W p ! 7 as S Tala Sh (! W Slater cam ^ ") Ovid 4 ! ! mant Snake River pm ^ ^ 3 ! es Cr (! ! ! ^ Li ! Gr Mi en ^ ^ ^ ttle eek 8 ! ^JULESBURG een Creek k Powder Wash ddle t ! Hereford (! ! 8 e NORTHGATE 4 ( Peetz ! ! Willo ork K R Virginia Jumbo Lake Sedgwick ! ! # T( ") Cre F ing (! 1 ek Y 7 RA ^ Cre CANYON ek Lara (! Dale B I§ w Big Creek o k F e 2 9 8 Cre 9 Cr x DAGGETT o Fo m Lakes e 7 C T(R B r NATURE TRAIL ") A ee u So k i e e lde d 7 r lomon e k a I« 1 0 Cr mil h k k r 17 t r r 293 PERKINS River Creek u e 9 River Pawnee v 1 e o e ") Carr ree r Rockport Stuc Poud 49 7 r® Dry S Ri C National 22 SENTINAL La HAMILTON RESERVOIR/ (! (! k 6 NE e A Gr e Halligan Res.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Water Conservation Methods to Conserve the High Plains Aquifer and Arikaree River Basin
    THESIS WATER CONSERVATION METHODS TO CONSERVE THE HIGH PLAINS AQUIFER AND ARIKAREE RIVER BASIN: A CASE STUDY ON THE ARIKAREE RIVER Submitted by Adam K. Prior Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Fall 2010 Master’s Committee: Department Head: Luis Garcia Advisor: Ramchand Oad James Prichett Terry Podmore Copyright by Adam Kent Prior 2010 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT WATER CONSERVATION METHODS TO CONSERVE THE HIGH PLAINS AQUIFER AND ARIKAREE RIVER BASIN: A CASE STUDY ON THE ARIKAREE RIVER Throughout the United States, and especially in Colorado, farmers confront the challenges of meeting water needs for crop production while trying to maintain natural habitats and conserve dwindling water supplies. The challenge of dividing limited resources creates a constant need for evaluation, research, and conservation of our valued water resources. The Arikaree River is a tributary of the Republican River on the Great Plains of Eastern Colorado. The river is groundwater dependent and receives flow from the underlying High Plains aquifer. The river alluvium has mature riparian communities of plains cottonwoods, habitat for threatened fish species such as the Hybognathus hankinsoni (Brassy Minnow), and habitat for many terrestrial invertebrates, sustained by water from the High Plains aquifer. In addition to the demands for maintenance of habitats, the surrounding, almost exclusively irrigated agricultural lands need water as well. The irrigation water supply is the groundwater pumped from the High Plains aquifer by high-capacity pumps. In recent years, the river became a series of disconnected pools or has dried up entirely during the late summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Peak-Flow Frequency Relations and Evaluation of the Peak-Flow Gaging Network in Nebraska
    Prepared in cooperation with the Nebraska Department of Roads Peak-Flow Frequency Relations and Evaluation of the Peak-Flow Gaging Network in Nebraska Water-Resources Investigations Report 99–4032 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Peak-Flow Frequency Relations and Evaluation of the Peak-Flow Gaging Network in Nebraska By Philip J. Soenksen, Lisa D. Miller, Jennifer B. Sharpe, and Jason R. Watton Water-Resources Investigations Report 99–4032 Prepared in cooperation with the Nebraska Department of Roads U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bruce Babbitt, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Lincoln, Nebraska, 1999 For additional information write to: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey, WRD 406 Federal Building 100 Centennial Mall North Lincoln, NE 68506 Copies of this report can be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 UPPER REPUBLICAN BASIN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD Waterbody/Assessment Unit: Arikaree River Water Quality Impairment: Selenium 1
    UPPER REPUBLICAN BASIN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD Waterbody/Assessment Unit: Arikaree River Water Quality Impairment: Selenium 1. INTRODUCTION AND PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Subbasin: Arikaree River County: Cheyenne HUC 8: (In Kansas) 10250001 HUC 11 (HUC 14s): (In Kansas) 080 (030, 040 and 050) Drainage Area: 37 square miles in Kansas 1725 square miles total above sampling station Main Stem Segment: WQLS: 1 (Arikaree River) starting at the Kansas-Nebraska state line and traveling upstream through northwest Cheyenne County to the Kansas-Colorado state line (Figure 1). Tributaries: All tributaries located in Colorado, segment numbers unknown Horse Creek Sand Creek Gordon Creek Currie Creek Dugout Creek Hell Creek North Fork Arikaree River Designated Uses: Special Aquatic Life Support, Primary Contact Recreation (C), Domestic Water Supply; Food Procurement; Ground Water Recharge; Industrial Water Supply Use; Irrigation Use; Livestock Watering Use for Kansas Segment. Impaired Use: Special Aquatic Life Water Quality Standard: 5 µg/liter for Chronic Aquatic Life (KAR 28-16-28e(c)(2)(F)(ii) 1 In stream segments where background concentrations of naturally occurring substances, including chlorides, sulfates and selenium, exceed the water quality criteria listed in Table 1a of KAR 28-16- 28e(d), at ambient flow, the existing water quality shall be maintained, and the newly established numeric criteria shall be the background concentration, as defined in KAR 28-16-28b(e). Background concentrations shall be established using the methods outlined in the “Kansas implementation procedures: surface water,” dated June 1, 1999... (KAR 28-16-28e(b)(9)). (Figure 1- Land use in the Arikaree River Basin. Kansas irrigation wells are visible in the inset.
    [Show full text]