Global Migratory Flyways Exchange Dec14

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

QLF MIDDLE EAST CONSERVATION EXCHANGE PROGRAM ~ GLOBAL MIGRATORY FLYWAYS ~ The QLF Middle East Conservation Exchange Program on Global Migratory Flyways, to be held in Jordan, is an opportunity for Conservation Professionals to share knowledge and expertise on best practices in the development and implementation of flyway-scale conservation policies and practices. The goals of the exchange are to build international relationships for the purposes of network cultivation, cross-pollination, and the transfer of effective practices, models, technologies and key ideas on migratory bird flyways. Every spring and autumn millions of migratory birds pass through the Middle East, a critical stop over site on the West Asian-East Africa Flyway and the Black Sea/Mediterranean Flyway. As migratory birds journey between breeding and non-breeding grounds, they cross major obstacles, natural and man-made; and borders, political and geographic, with changing conservation capacities. A biogeographical perspective supports natural patterns of migration, which overlie the global geopolitical system, and encourages the conservation and management of migratory species, or the habitats and sites on which they depend, across national boundaries and jurisdictions. Flyway-scale initiatives for migratory bird conservation have been undertaken by conservation organizations in the Middle East. Although in Israel, for example, cross-border conservation is challenging due, in part, to the Israeli-Arab conflict. As well, opportunities for conversations on the successes and challenges of flyway initiatives have been scant between different flyways, as well as between species groups of birds within flyways, e.g. waterbirds, landbirds, soaring birds and seabirds. This eight day (exclusive of travel) Middle East Exchange Program in the Spring of 2018 is an opportunity to address this gap and contribute to a global view of flyway conservation. Participants will be representative of each of the global migratory flyways: West Pacific – Alaska to New Zealand Black Sea/Mediterranean – Russian Arctic Pacific Americas – Alaska to Patagonia to South Africa Mississippi Americas – Canadian Arctic to West Asian-East Africa – Eastern Siberia to South America west coast South Africa Atlantic Americas – Canadian Arctic to Central Asian – Arctic Ocean to the Indian South America east coast Ocean East Atlantic – Eastern Canada/Central East Asian-Australasian – Northern Asia Siberia to West Africa and Alaska to Southeast Asia and Australasia Also, participants will be representative of different species groups of migratory birds. QLF will tap its Alumni in Israel, Jordan, and Palestine for site visits to include the Jerusalem Bird Observatory, Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel, The International Birding and Research Center, Birdlife International Middle East Regional Office, and the Migratory Soaring Birds Project Regional Flyway Facility. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Acoustic Monitoring of Night-Migrating Birds: a Progress Report
Acoustic Monitoring of Night-Migrating Birds: A Progress Report William R. Evans Kenneth V. Rosenberg Abstract—This paper discusses an emerging methodology that to give regular vocalizations in night migration are the vireos uses electronic technology to monitor vocalizations of night-migrat- (Vireonidae), flycatchers (Tyrannidae), and orioles (Icterinae). ing birds. On a good migration night in eastern North America, If a monitoring protocol is consistently maintained, an array thousands of call notes may be recorded from a single ground-based, of microphone stations can provide information on how the audio-recording station, and an array of recording stations across a species composition and number of vocal migrants vary across region may serve as a “recording net” to monitor a broad front of time and space. Such data have application for monitoring migration. Data from pilot studies in Florida, Texas, New York, and avian populations and identifying their migration routes. In British Columbia illustrate the potential of this technique to gather addition, detection and classification of distinctive call-types information that cannot be gathered by more conventional methods, is possible with computers (Mills 1995; Taylor 1995), thus such as mist-netting or diurnal counts. For example, the Texas information on bird populations might be gained automati- station detected a major migration of grassland sparrows, and a cally. In this paper, we summarize the current state of station in British Columbia detected hundreds of Swainson’s knowledge for identifying night-flight calls to species; present Thrushes; both phenomena were not detected with ground monitor- selected results from four ongoing studies that are monitoring ing efforts.
[Show full text]
The All-Bird Bulletin
Advancing Integrated Bird Conservation in North America Spring 2014 Inside this issue: The All-Bird Bulletin Protecting Habitat for 4 the Buff-breasted Sandpiper in Bolivia The Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Conserving the “Jewels 6 Act (NMBCA): Thirteen Years of Hemispheric in the Crown” for Neotropical Migrants Bird Conservation Guy Foulks, Program Coordinator, Division of Bird Habitat Conservation, U.S. Fish and Bird Conservation in 8 Wildlife Service (USFWS) Costa Rica’s Agricultural Matrix In 2000, responding to alarming declines in many Neotropical migratory bird popu- Uruguayan Rice Fields 10 lations due to habitat loss and degradation, Congress passed the Neotropical Migra- as Wintering Habitat for tory Bird Conservation Act (NMBCA). The legislation created a unique funding Neotropical Shorebirds source to foster the cooperative conservation needed to sustain these species through all stages of their life cycles, which occur throughout the Western Hemi- Conserving Antigua’s 12 sphere. Since its first year of appropriations in 2002, the NMBCA has become in- Most Critical Bird strumental to migratory bird conservation Habitat in the Americas. Neotropical Migratory 14 Bird Conservation in the The mission of the North American Bird Heart of South America Conservation Initiative is to ensure that populations and habitats of North Ameri- Aros/Yaqui River Habi- 16 ca's birds are protected, restored, and en- tat Conservation hanced through coordinated efforts at in- ternational, national, regional, and local Strategic Conservation 18 levels, guided by sound science and effec- in the Appalachians of tive management. The NMBCA’s mission Southern Quebec is to achieve just this for over 380 Neo- tropical migratory bird species by provid- ...and more! Cerulean Warbler, a Neotropical migrant, is a ing conservation support within and be- USFWS Bird of Conservation Concern and listed as yond North America—to Latin America Vulnerable on the International Union for Conser- Coordination and editorial vation of Nature (IUCN) Red List.
[Show full text]
A Wood-Concrete Nest Box to Study Burrow-Nesting Petrels
Bedolla-Guzmán et al.: Wood-concrete nest boxes to study petrels 249 A WOOD-CONCRETE NEST BOX TO STUDY BURROW-NESTING PETRELS YULIANA BEDOLLA-GUZMÁN1,2, JUAN F. MASELLO1, ALFONSO AGUIRRE-MUÑOZ2 & PETRA QUILLFELDT1 1Department of Animal Ecology and Systematics, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 38, 35392 Giessen, Germany 2Grupo de Ecología y Conservación de Islas, A.C., Moctezuma 836, Zona Centro, 22800, Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico ([email protected]) Received 6 July 2016, accepted 31 August 2016 Artificial nests have been a useful research and conservation tool is an extended period of bi-parental care, and parents return to feed for a variety of petrel species (Podolsky & Kress 1989, Priddel & the chick only at night (Brooke 2004). Carlile 1995, De León & Mínguez 2003, Bolton et al. 2004). They facilitate observation and provide easy access, reducing overall At San Benito West Island, 140 artificial wooden nests were disturbance to seabirds (Wilson 1986, Priddel & Carlile 1995) deployed by previous researchers, beginning in 1999, to study the and increasing data-collection efficiency (Wilson 1986). Likewise, breeding biology of Cassin’s Auklet Ptychoramphus aleuticus. restoration programs using artificial nests have improved the Auklets readily accepted and used the nest boxes. In the first year, number of potential nest sites, breeding success (Priddel & Carlile the occupancy rate was 30%, increasing to 80% in the fifth year 1995, De León & Mínguez 2003, Bolton et al. 2004, Bried et al. (Shaye Wolf, pers. comm.). At San Benito, auklets breed earlier 2009, McIver et al. 2016) and adult survival rates (Libois et al.
[Show full text]
Chapter 8 Migration Studies
Chapter 8 Migration Studies 100 Migration Studies Overview Theme he Pacific Flyway is a route taken by migratory birds during flights between breeding grounds in the north and wintering grounds in the south. Steigerwald Lake National Wildlife Refuge plays an important role in migration by providing birds with a protected resting area during their arduous journey. Migration makes it possible for birds to benefit the most from favorable weather conditions; they breed and feed in the north during the summer and rest and feed in the warmer south during the winter. This pattern is called return migration — the most common type of migration by birds. Through a variety of activities, students will learn about the factors and hazards of bird migration on the Pacific Flyway. Background The migration of birds usually refers to their regular flights between summer and winter homes. Some birds migrate thousands of miles, while others may travel less than a hundred miles. This seasonal movement has long been a mystery to humans. Aristotle, the naturalist and philosopher of ancient Greece, noticed that cranes, pelicans, geese, swans, doves, and many other birds moved to warmer places for the winter. Like others of times past, he proposed theories that were widely accepted for hundreds of years. One of his theories was that many birds spent the winter sleeping in hollow trees, caves, or beneath the mud in marshes. 101 Through natural selection, migration evolved as an advantageous behavior. Birds migrate north to nest and breed because the competition for food and space is substantially lower there. In addition, during the summer months the food supply is considerably better in many northern climates (e.g., Arctic regions).
[Show full text]
Nest Density and Success of Columbids in Puerto Rico ’
The Condor98:1OC-113 0 The CooperOrnithological Society 1996 NEST DENSITY AND SUCCESS OF COLUMBIDS IN PUERTO RICO ’ FRANK F. RIVERA-MILAN~ Department ofNatural Resources,Scientific Research Area, TerrestrialEcology Section, Stop 3 Puerta. de Tierra, 00906, Puerto Rico Abstract. A total of 868 active nests of eight speciesof pigeonsand doves (columbids) were found in 210 0.1 ha strip-transectssampled in the three major life zones of Puerto Rico from February 1987 to June 1992. The columbids had a peak in nest density in May and June, with a decline during the July to October flocking period, and an increasefrom November to April. Predation accountedfor 8 1% of the nest lossesobserved from 1989 to 1992. Nest cover was the most important microhabitat variable accountingfor nest failure or successaccording to univariate and multivariate comparisons. The daily survival rate estimates of nests constructed on epiphytes were significantly higher than those of nests constructedon the bare branchesof trees. Rainfall of the first six months of the year during the study accounted for 67% and 71% of the variability associatedwith the nest density estimatesof the columbids during the reproductivepeak in the xerophytic forest of Gulnica and dry coastal forest of Cabo Rojo, but only 9% of the variability of the nest density estimatesof the columbids in the moist montane second-growthforest patchesof Cidra. In 1988, the abundance of fruits of key tree species(nine speciescombined) was positively correlatedwith the seasonalchanges in nest density of the columbids in the strip-transects of Cayey and Cidra. Pairwise density correlationsamong the columbids suggestedparallel responsesof nestingpopulations to similar or covarying resourcesin the life zones of Puerto Rico.
[Show full text]
POLICY OPTIONS for MIGRATORY BIRD FLYWAYS CMS Flyways Working Group: Review 3
CONVENTION ON MIGRATORY SPECIES POLICY OPTIONS FOR MIGRATORY BIRD FLYWAYS CMS Flyways Working Group: Review 3 Colin A Galbraith March 2011 CMS Contract No 14550 and additional staff time from Colin Galbraith Environment Limited Policy Options for Migratory Bird Flyways CMS Flyways Working Group: Review 3 CONTENTS PAGE Executive summary 3 Introduction 14 1.1 Background and approach used 14 The major flyways 15 2.1 Flyways 15 2.2 The status of species on flyways 20 Coverage of existing CMS and non CMS instruments and frameworks 22 3.1 Summary of existing agreements 22 3.2 Gaps in geographical coverage 22 3.3 Coverage of species groups 23 3.4 Priorities to fill the gaps in coverage 24 The key pressures impacting on migratory birds 25 4.1 Habitat loss, fragmentation and reduction in quality 26 4.2 Climate change 28 4.3 By-catch 30 4.4 Unsustainable use 32 4.5 Lead shot and other poisons 35 4.6 Invasive alien species 36 4.7 Agricultural conflicts and pest control 37 4.8 Disease 38 4.9 Information gaps 39 2 Priorities for the development of CMS instruments to cover flyways 40 5.1 The role of CMS 40 5.2 Geographical priorities 41 5.3 Species priorities 46 Options for CMS instruments for migratory bird conservation 49 6.1 High level policy options 50 6.2 Developing a new approach 51 6.3 Identification of priorities and a plan for action 55 6.4 Mechanisms for action 59 6.5 Issues of profile 61 6.6 Practicalities 61 Annex 1 Timetable for major forthcoming meetings 64 Annex 2 Threatened waterbirds in the East Asian-Australasian Flyway 67 Annex 3
[Show full text]
Europe's Huntable Birds a Review of Status and Conservation Priorities
FACE - EUROPEAN FEDERATIONEurope’s FOR Huntable HUNTING Birds A Review AND CONSERVATIONof Status and Conservation Priorities Europe’s Huntable Birds A Review of Status and Conservation Priorities December 2020 1 European Federation for Hunting and Conservation (FACE) Established in 1977, FACE represents the interests of Europe’s 7 million hunters, as an international non-profit-making non-governmental organisation. Its members are comprised of the national hunters’ associations from 37 European countries including the EU-27. FACE upholds the principle of sustainable use and in this regard its members have a deep interest in the conservation and improvement of the quality of the European environment. See: www.face.eu Reference Sibille S., Griffin, C. and Scallan, D. (2020) Europe’s Huntable Birds: A Review of Status and Conservation Priorities. European Federation for Hunting and Conservation (FACE). https://www.face.eu/ 2 Europe’s Huntable Birds A Review of Status and Conservation Priorities Executive summary Context Non-Annex species show the highest proportion of ‘secure’ status and the lowest of ‘threatened’ status. Taking all wild birds into account, The EU State of Nature report (2020) provides results of the national the situation has deteriorated from the 2008-2012 to the 2013-2018 reporting under the Birds and Habitats directives (2013 to 2018), and a assessments. wider assessment of Europe’s biodiversity. For FACE, the findings are of key importance as they provide a timely health check on the status of In the State of Nature report (2020), ‘agriculture’ is the most frequently huntable birds listed in Annex II of the Birds Directive.
[Show full text]
High Apparent Survival of Adult Leach's Storm
Rennie et al.: Survival of adult Leach’s Storm Petrels in western Canada 133 HIGH APPARENT SURVIVAL OF ADULT LEACH’S STORM PETRELS OCEANODROMA LEUCORHOA IN BRITISH COLUMBIA ISOBEL R.F. RENNIE1, DAVID J. GREEN1, ELIZABETH A. KREBS2 & ANNE HARFENIST3 1Simon Fraser University, Centre for Wildlife Ecology, Department of Biological Sciences, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada 2Wildlife Research Division, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, 5421 Robertson Road, Delta, BC V4K 3N2, Canada ([email protected]) 3Harfenist Environmental Consulting, PO Box 2498, Smithers, BC V0J 2N0, Canada Received 04 November 2019, accepted 10 February 2020 ABSTRACT RENNIE, I.R.F., GREEN, D.J., KREBS, E.A. & HARFENIST, A. 2020. High apparent survival of Leach’s Storm Petrels Oceanodroma leucorhoa in British Columbia. Marine Ornithology 48: 133–140. Leach’s Storm Petrels Oceanodroma leucorhoa were listed as Vulnerable by the IUCN in 2018. Population declines in the western North Atlantic are associated with low annual adult survival rates, but trends and vital rates of populations in the eastern North Pacific are poorly known. To address this knowledge gap, we estimated the annual apparent survival of breeding adults at two colonies off the coast of British Columbia (Rock Islets: 52°20ʹ40″N, 131°14ʹ10″W and Cleland Island: 49°10ʹ17″N, 126°05ʹ28″W), using capture-mark-recapture data collected between 2006 and 2010. Transient models received substantially more support than standard Cormack-Jolly-Seber models, suggesting that the initial capture and banding reduced burrow fidelity. The model-averaged annual apparent survival rates for both colonies were high (estimate for each colony = 0.975 ± 0.011), compared to rates reported for colonies in the western North Atlantic (< 0.80).
[Show full text]
Missouri Bird Conservation Plan
Missouri Bird Conservation Plan Outreach Section Missouri Bird Conservation Plan Outreach Section Team Sarah Kendrick, Missouri Department of Conservation Lisa Berger, Greater Ozarks Audubon Society John Besser, Columbia Audubon Society Carol Davit, Missouri Prairie Foundation Holly Dentner, Missouri Department of Conservation Alison Dubbert, Missouri Department of Natural Resources State Parks Heather Feeler, Missouri Department of Conservation Dawn Fredrickson, Missouri Department of Natural Resources State Parks Conway Hawn, Ozark Rivers Audubon Society Tara Hohman, Audubon Center at Riverlands Lauren Hildreth, Missouri Department of Conservation Austin Lambert, Missouri Department of Conservation Mitch Leachman, St. Louis Audubon Society Kendell Loyd, Greater Ozarks Audubon Society Rudy Martinez, Missouri Department of Conservation Bill Mees, Missouri Bird Conservation Initiative Mary Nemecek, Burroughs Audubon Society Kelly Rezac, Missouri Department of Conservation Anne Tieber, St. Louis Zoo Edge Wade, Missouri Birding Society Paige Witek, Missouri River Bird Observatory Michelle Wiegand, Audubon Center at Riverlands Missouri Birding Society 2 Table of Contents CALL TO ACTION ........................................................................................................................................... 4 BACKGROUND AND CONCEPT ...................................................................................................................... 5 Scope of the Missouri Bird Conservation Plan ........................................................................................
[Show full text]
Central Flyway Databook 2020 MIGRATORY GAME BIRD HUNTING PERMITS by PROVINCE/TERRITORY of PURCHASE in CANADA
CENTRAL FLYWAY HARVEST AND POPULATION SURVEY DATA BOOK 2020 compiled by: James A. Dubovsky CENTRAL FLYWAY REPRESENTATIVE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE DIVISION OF MIGRATORY BIRD MANAGEMENT 134 Union Blvd., Suite 540 Lakewood, CO 80228 (303) 275-2386 Suggested Citation: Dubovsky, J. A., compiler. 2020. Central Flyway harvest and population survey data book 2020. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Lakewood CO. CENTRAL FLYWAY 1948-2020 73 YEARS OF MIGRATORY BIRD CONSERVATION Important Note to Users: From 1961-2001, estimates of waterfowl harvest, waterfowl hunter participation, and waterfowl hunter success in the United States were derived from a combination of several sources: 1) sales of migratory bird conservation stamps (Duck Stamps), 2) a Mail Questionnaire Survey of individuals who purchased ducks stamps for hunting purposes, and 3) the Waterfowl Parts Collection Survey (PCS). This survey, which was based on duck stamp sales was discontinued after the 2001 hunting season. Beginning in 1999, new survey methods were implemented that obtained estimates of waterfowl harvest, hunter participation, and hunter success from: 1) States' lists of migratory bird hunters identified through the Harvest Information Program (HIP), 2) a questionnaire (HIP Survey) sent to a sample of those hunters, and 3) the Waterfowl PCS. The basic difference is that during 1961 - 2001 waterfowl hunter activity and harvest estimates were derived from a Mail Questionnaire Survey (MQS) of duck stamp purchasers, whereas from 1999 to the present those estimates were derived from HIP surveys of people identified as migratory bird hunters by the States. Both survey systems relied on the Waterfowl PCS for species composition data.
[Show full text]
A Bird's EYE View on Flyways
A BIRD’S EYE VIEW ON FLywayS A brief tour by the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals IMPRINT Published by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the Secretariat of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) A BIRD’S EYE VIEW ON FLywayS A brief tour by the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals UNEP / CMS Secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 68 pages. Produced by UNEP/CMS Text based on a report by Joost Brouwer in colaboration with Gerard Boere Coordinator Francisco Rilla, CMS Secretariat, E-mail: [email protected] Editing & Proof Reading Hanah Al-Samaraie, Robert Vagg Editing Assistant Stéphanie de Pury Publishing Manager Hanah Al-Samaraie, Email: [email protected] Design Karina Waedt © 2009 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) / Convention on Migratory Species (CMS). This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. DISCLAIMER The contents of this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP or contributory organizations.The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contrib- utory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area in its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
[Show full text]
2019 Waterfowl Population Status Survey
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Waterfowl Population Status, 2019 Waterfowl Population Status, 2019 August 19, 2019 In the United States the process of establishing hunting regulations for waterfowl is conducted annually. This process involves a number of scheduled meetings in which information regarding the status of waterfowl is presented to individuals within the agencies responsible for setting hunting regulations. In addition, the proposed regulations are published in the Federal Register to allow public comment. This report includes the most current breeding population and production information available for waterfowl in North America and is a result of cooperative eforts by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the Canadian Wildlife Service (CWS), various state and provincial conservation agencies, and private conservation organizations. In addition to providing current information on the status of populations, this report is intended to aid the development of waterfowl harvest regulations in the United States for the 2020–2021 hunting season. i Acknowledgments Waterfowl Population and Habitat Information: The information contained in this report is the result of the eforts of numerous individuals and organizations. Principal contributors include the Canadian Wildlife Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, state wildlife conservation agencies, provincial conservation agencies from Canada, and Dirección General de Conservación Ecológica de los Recursos Naturales, Mexico. In addition, several conservation organizations, other state and federal agencies, universities, and private individuals provided information or cooperated in survey activities. Appendix A.1 provides a list of individuals responsible for the collection and compilation of data for the “Status of Ducks” section of this report.
[Show full text]