DOCSLIB.ORG

Aquatic Communities and Contaminants in Fish from Streams of the Red River of the North Basin, Minnesota and North Dakota by R.M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aquatic Communities and Contaminants in Fish from Streams of the Red River of the North Basin, Minnesota and North Dakota by R.M Aquatic Communities and Contaminants in Fish from Streams of the Red River of the North Basin, Minnesota and North Dakota By R.M. Goldstein________________________________ U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4047 Contribution from the National Water Quality Assessment Program Mounds View, Minnesota 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center District Chief Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286, MS 517 2280 Woodale Drive Denver Federal Center Mounds View, MN 55112 Denver, CO 80225 Information regarding the National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program is available on the Internet via the World Wide Web. You may connect to the NAWQA Home Page using the Universal Resource Locator (URL) at: <URL:http://wwwrvares.er.usgs.gov/nawqa/nawqa_home.html> FOREWORD Describe current water-quality conditions for a large part of the Nation's freshwater streams, rivers, and aquifers. Describe how water quality is changing over The mission of the U.S. Geological Survey time. (USGS) is to assess the quantity and quality of the Improve understanding of the primary natural earth resources of the Nation and to provide and human factors that affect water-quality information that will assist resource managers and conditions. policymakers at Federal, State, and local levels in This information will help support the making sound decisions. Assessment of water- development and evaluation of management, quality conditions and trends is an important part regulatory, and monitoring decisions by other of this overall mission. Federal, State, and local agencies to protect, use, and enhance water resources. One of the greatest challenges faced by water- resources scientists is acquiring reliable The goals of the NAWQA Program are being information that will guide the use and protection achieved through investigations of 60 of the of the Nation's water resources. That challenge is Nation's most important river basins and aquifer being addressed by Federal, State, interstate, and systems, which are referred to as study units. These local water-resource agencies and by many study units are distributed throughout the Nation academic institutions. These organizations are and cover a diversity of hydrogeologic settings. collecting water-quality data for a host of purposes More than two-thirds of the Nation's freshwater that include: compliance with permits and water- use occurs within the 60 study units and more than supply standards; development of remediation two-thirds of the people served by public water- plans for a specific contamination problem; supply systems live within their boundaries. operational decisions on industrial, wastewater, or National synthesis of data analysis, based on water-supply facilities; and research on factors that aggregation of comparable information obtained affect water quality. An additional need for water- from the study units, is a major component of the quality information is to provide a basis on which program. This effort focuses on selected water- regional and national-level policy decisions can be quality topics using nationally consistent based. Wise decisions must be based on sound information. Comparative studies will explain information. As a society we need to know whether differences and similarities in observed water- certain types of water-quality problems are isolated quality conditions among study areas and will or ubiquitous, whether there are significant identify changes and trends and their causes. The differences in conditions among regions, whether first topics addressed by the national synthesis are the conditions are changing over time, and why pesticides, nutrients, volatile organic compounds, these conditions change from place to place and and aquatic biology. Discussions on these and other over time. The information can be used to help water-quality topics will be published in periodic determine the efficacy of existing water-quality summaries of the quality of the Nation's ground policies and to help analysts determine the need and surface water as the information becomes for, and likely consequences, of new policies. available. This report is an element of the comprehensive To address these needs, the Congress body of information developed as part of the appropriated funds in 1986 for the USGS to begin a NAWQA Program. The program depends heavily pilot program in seven project areas to develop and on the advice, cooperation, and information from refine the National Water-Quality Assessment many Federal, State, interstate, Tribal, and local (NAWQA) Program. In 1991, the USGS began full agencies and the public. The assistance and implementation of the program. The NAWQA suggestions of all are greatly appreciated. Program builds upon an existing base of water- quality studies of the USGS, as well as those of other Federal, State, and local agencies. The Robert M. Hirsch objectives of the NAWQA Program are to: Chief Hydrologist IV Contents Abstract.................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................................................ 1 Purpose and scope............................................................................................................................................ 3 Previous studies................................................................................................................................................ 3 General glacial history ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Hydraulic alterations........................................................................................................................................ 4 Ecological regions............................................................................................................................................ 7 Acknowledgments............................................................................................................................................ 11 Aquatic communities............................................................................................................................................. 11 Macroinvertebrates and algae........................................................................................................................... 11 Insects...................................................................................................................................................... 11 Mollusks.................................................................................................................................................. 12 Algae.......................................................^ 12 Fish communities and distributions.................................................................................................................. 13 Zoogeography.......................................................................................................................................... 13 Recent introductions offish..................................................................................................................... 14 Fisheries................................................................................................................................................... 15 Endangered species.................................................................................................................................. 15 Fish communities..................................................................................................................................... 15 Contaminants in fish.............................................................................................................................................. 27 Trace elements.................................................................................................................................................. 27 Organochlorine compounds............................................................................................................................. 29 Summary................................................................................................................................................................ 29 References..........................................................................................................._^ 30 Illustrations Figure 1-5. Maps showing: 1. Major rivers in the Red River of the North Basin...................................................................... 2 2. Portions of the United States and Canada covered by glacial Lake Agassiz............................. 5 3. Locations of dams and reservoirs in the Red River of the North Basin..................................... 6 4. Areas of wetlands and drainage ditches in the Red River of the North Basin........................... 8 5. Ecoregions of the Red River of the North Basin........................................................................ 10 6-8. Graphs showing: 6. Species richness of rivers that flow through one,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1988007W.Pdf
    TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF FIGURES n LIST OF TABLES w LIST OF APPENDICES iv ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 1 I OBJECTIVES OF STUDY 3 ∎ METHODS 3 I DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA 7 RESULTS 7 SPECIES ACCOUNTS 13 Federally Endangered Species 13 Federal Candidate Species 15 I Proposed State Endangered Species 15 Proposed State Threatened Species 16 Watch List Species 16 Other Species 17 I Introduced Species 33 ∎ DISCUSSION 33 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 35 LITERATURE CITED 36 I I I I LIST OF FIGURES PAGE Figure 1 . Collection sites in the Little Wabash River drainage, 1988 6 Figure 2. The Little Wabash River and its tributaries 8 Figure 3. Number of individuals collected liver per site in the Little Wabash River (main channel) in 1988 12 I Figure 4 . Number of species collected per site in the Little Wabash River (main channel) in 1988 12 I I I I I I LIST OF TABLES PAGE Table 1 . Comparison of the mussel species of the Little Wabash River reported by Baker (1906) and others [pre-1950], Fechtner (1963) [1951-53], Parmalee [1954], Matteson [1956], INHS [1957-88], and this study 4 Table 2 . Collection sites in the Little Wabash River drainage, 1988 5 Table 3 . Total,rank order of abundance and percent composition of the mussel species collected live in the Little Wabash River drainage, 1988 9 Table 4. Site by site listing of all mussel species collected in the Little Wabash River drainage, 1988 10-11 Table 5. Site by site listing of all mussel species collected by M .R . Matteson in the Little Wabash River, 1956 14 I I iii LIST OF APPENDICES PAGE Appendix I .
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Habitat and Otter Population Status Alan Woolf Southern Illinois University Carbondale
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Final Reports Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory 7-1997 Survey of Habitat and Otter Population Status Alan Woolf Southern Illinois University Carbondale Richard S. Halbrook Southern Illinois University Carbondale D. Todd Farrand Southern Illinois University Carbondale Chad Schieler Southern Illinois University Carbondale Ted Weber Southern Illinois University Carbondale Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cwrl_fr W-122-R-3. Recommended Citation Woolf, Alan; Halbrook, Richard S.; Farrand, D. Todd; Schieler, Chad; and Weber, Ted, "Survey of Habitat and Otter Population Status" (1997). Final Reports. Paper 7. http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cwrl_fr/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Final Reports by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SURVEY OF HABITAT AND OTTER POPULATION STATUS FINAL REPORT Federal Aid Project W-122-R-3 Submitted by: Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory, SIUC Presented to: Division of Wildlife Resources Illinois Department of Natural Resources Principal Investigators Alan Woolf Richard S. Halbrook Graduate Research Assistants/Staff D. Todd Farrand (Graduate Assistant) Chad Schieler (Graduate Assistant) Ted Weber (Researcher II) July 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES. iii LIST OF FIGURES.. v LIST OF APPENDICES. vii NEED. 1 OBJECTIVES. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.. 10 JOB 1.1. OTTER HABITAT CRITERIA AND MONITORING.. 11 OBJECTIVES.. 11 INTRODUCTION.. 11 METHODS. 12 Habitat Characterization. 12 Otter Monitoring. 23 RESULTS. 24 Habitat Characterization. 24 Otter Monitoring. 25 DISCUSSION.
    [Show full text]
  • South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed Tmdl Report
    Illinois Bureau of Water Environmental P.O. Box 19276 Protection Agency Springfield, IL 62794-9276 December 2007 IEPA/BOW/07-027 SOUTH FORK SANGAMON RIVER/LAKE TAYLORVILLE WATERSHED TMDL REPORT Printed on Recycled Paper THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Contents Section 1 Goals and Objectives for South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed (0713000702) 1.1 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Overview............................................. 1-1 1.2 TMDL Goals and Objectives for South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed ..................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Report Overview.............................................................................................. 1-3 Section 2 South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed Description 2.1 South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed Location............... 2-1 2.2 Topography...................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Land Use.......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.4 Soils.................................................................................................................. 2-2 2.4.1 South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed Soil Characteristics.................................................................................... 2-3 2.5 Population .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impacts of Oil Field Brines in Southeastern Clay County, Illinois
    557 ILLINOIS GEOLOGICAL IL6of (\ 1989-3 SURVEY LIBRARY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF OIL FIELD BRINES IN SOUTHEASTERN CLAY COUNTY, ILLINOIS Edited by; Bruce R. Kensel and Dennis P. McKenna with contributions by: J. Roger Adams (2)^ Allison R. Brigham^-^) Steven L. Burch(2) Billy K. Cook(2) Barbara R. Cline^^) Paul C. Heigold(\) Louis R. Iverson^-^) Douglas E. Laymon^-^) Edward A. Lisowski^-^) Vickie L. Poole (^-) Raman K. Raman (^) Edward C. Smith (1) John D. Steele(l) Christopher J. Stohr(l) Stephen Whitaker(^) Illinois State Geological Survey Champaign, Illinois OPEN FILE SERIES 1989-3 (^*^ Illinois State Geological Survey -^^lilinois State Water Survey (^H.llinois Natural History Survey ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 3 3051 00006 9728 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF OIL FIELD BRINES IN SOUTHEASTERN CLAY COUNTY, ILLINOIS Edited by: Bruce R. Hensel and Dennis P. McKenna with contributions by: J. Roger Adams (2) ^ Allison R. Brighain(3) ^^y Steven L. Burch^^) \P ^, Billy K. Cook(2) (JC-' r^ Barbara R. Cline(l) .q"^ <^ Paul C. Heigold(l) o^ o^^^ ^ <^^ <^^^ Louis R. Iverson(3) _ Douglas E. Laymon^-^) ^v. Edward A. Lisowski^-^) ^'^ Vickie L. Poole(l) Raman K. Raman (2) Edward C. Smith (1) John D. Steele(l) Christopher J. Stohr^^) Stephen Whitaker^^) Illinois State Geological Survey Champaign, Illinois OPEN FILE SERIES 1989-3 (-'-) Illinois State Geological Survey (2) Illinois State Water Survey (^) Illinois Natural History Survey PART ONE OVERVIEW - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . ABSTRACT Brine waters, characterized by high concentrations of dissolved minerals, can be found at depth throughout the oil producing region of Illinois. Because petroleum traps commonly contain both brines and petroleum, both liquids are commonly pumped to the surface.
    [Show full text]
  • EPA/600/R-06/104 September, 2006
    LEV EL III AND IV EC OR EGIONS OF ILLIN OIS by Alan J. Woods1 James M. Omernik2 Charles L. Pederson3 Brian C. Moran4 EPA/600/R-06/104 September, 2006 1Department of Geosciences, Oregon State University U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory 200 SW 35th Street Corvallis, Oregon 97333 2U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory 200 SW 35th Street Corvallis, Oregon 97333 3Department of Biological Sciences, Eastern Illinois University Charleston, Illinois 61920 4Indus Corporation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory 200 SW 35th Street Corvallis, Oregon 97333 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................3 PRIMARY SOURCES FOR ILLINOIS ECOREGION INFORMATION ....................................................................4 REGIONAL DESCRIPTIONS .................................................................................................................................... 5-17 52. DRIFTLESS AREA ........................................................................................................................................5 52a. Savanna Section.................................................................................................................................6 52b. Paleozoic
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Oil Field Brine Disposal Assessment
    WIS EA UBF 3 7600 0OO20 2047 Illinois Oil Field Brine Disposal Assessment ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANNING Staff Report LA* /.•:•<.<?.v 8 EMVIRO ; ' iTALfRHTECTION AGENCY STAlybr ILLINOIS SPRfNj&FflELDJLLJNOiS V P ILLINOIS OIL FIELD BRINE DISPOSAL ASSESSMENT STAFF REPORT ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 208 WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANNING PROGRAM ^ - PLANNING AND STANDARDS SECTION ->* DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL m , 2200 CHURCHILL ROAD * " SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS 62706 NOVEMBER, 1978 P •; r-'^m^^Y EI\Vll?ON(.r£hTALPROiECTiON.AGENCY STATE Or ILLINOIS -i SPRINGFIELDfILLlNOIS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES 111 LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF PLATES .. v LIST OF APPENDICES vi Chapter FOREWORD vii INTRODUCTION 1 Initial Inquiries and Study Objectives 1 Origin of Oil Field Brine. .| 3 Oil Production ,. , 6 Fluid Injection 6 Brine Pollution 11 FIELD INVESTIGATIONS 21 Criteria 21 Location and Study of Sites 22 Investigative Procedures 23 Field Conditions 34 Evaporation/Seepage Pits 34 Injection Operations 40 Abandoned Wells 44 PRELIMINARY FINDINGS 46 PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS 48 GLOSSARY 49 REFERENCES 51 APPENDICES 53 n LIST OF TABLES Table Page I. Comparison of Sea Water and Oil Field Brine 4 II. IPCB Water Quality Standards 11 III. Average Concentrations of the Major Chemical Constituents From Each Piezometer and Pit 31 m LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Geologic Structure of the Illinois Basin ... 5 2. Oil Production in Illinois 7 3. Isocon Map of Ste. Genevieve Brines & 4. Generalized Movement of Water in the Vicinity of Holding Ponds 13 5. Location Map of Study Sites. 24 6. Generalized Location of Hagarstown Member of the Glasford Formation ..
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Wabash Regional Planning and Development
    2011 Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Greater Wabash Region Greater Wabash Regional Planning Commission Accepted by the District CEDS Committee: February 23, 2011 Approved by the Economic Development Administration: Approved by the Board of Directors: 1 | Page Greater Wabash Regional Planning Commission 10 West Main St., P.O. Box 209 Albion, IL 62806 Serving Crawford, Edwards, Lawrence, Richland, Wabash, Wayne, and White Counties Sarah A. Mann Executive Director March 31, 2011 Mr. C. Robert Sawyer, Regional Director Economic Development Administration 111 North Canal Street Suite 855 Chicago, IL 60606-7208 Dear Mr. Sawyer: Pursuant to the requirements of the EDA 301 (b) planning grant received by Greater Wabash Regional Planning Commission, we are pleased to present the attached 2011 Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS): Greater Wabash Region. Following approval by the EDA Chicago Regional Office, the District CEDS will be sent to all pertinent individuals within the District. The District CEDS document represents a complete update of the former CEDS published in 2009. This document incorporates all the new regulations established in 2006 by the Economic Development Administration’s Final Rule. Respectfully Submitted, Sarah A. Mann Sarah A. Mann Executive Director Phone: (618) 445-3612 Fax: (618) 445-3629 www.gwrpc.com 2 | Page 2011 CEDS Acknowledgements The Greater Wabash Regional Planning Commission (GWRPC) would like to express its grateful appreciation to the following organizations and local governments for
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Chlorophyll-Aas a Criterion for Establishing Nutrient
    TECHNICAL REPORTS: SURFACE WATER QUALITY Assessment of Chlorophyll-a as a Criterion for Establishing Nutrient Standards in the Streams and Rivers of Illinois Todd V. Royer* Indiana University Mark B. David, Lowell E. Gentry, Corey A. Mitchell, and Karen M. Starks University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Thomas Heatherly II and Matt R. Whiles Southern Illinois University Nutrient enrichment is a frequently cited cause for biotic he Federal Clean Water Act requires states to identify impairment of streams and rivers in the USA. Eff orts are Timpaired water bodies and develop plans to reduce underway to develop nutrient standards in many states, but impairment. Nutrient enrichment, mainly with nitrogen (N) defensible nutrient standards require an empirical relationship between nitrogen (N) or phosphorus (P) concentrations and and phosphorus (P), is a frequently cited cause of impairment for some criterion that relates nutrient levels to the attainment streams and rivers (USEPA, 2000a). Nutrient loading can degrade of designated uses. Algal biomass, measured as chlorophyll-a the ecological integrity of streams and create human health (chl-a), is a commonly proposed criterion, yet nutrient–chl-a concerns. For example, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency relationships have not been well documented in Illinois at a (USEPA) has set a drinking water standard of 10 mg NO –N L−1 state-wide scale. We used state-wide surveys of >100 stream 3 and river sites to assess the applicability of chl-a as a criterion to prevent methemoglobenemia. No drinking water standard for establishing nutrient standards for Illinois. Among all sites, exists for P; however, P enrichment can aff ect drinking water the median total P and total N concentrations were 0.185 and supplies by stimulating blooms of toxin-producing organisms, 5.6 mg L−1, respectively, during high-discharge conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH DAKOTA GAME and FISH DEPARTMENT Final Report Status of Selected Fishes with Immediate Conservation Need in North Dakota Pr
    NORTH DAKOTA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT Final Report Status of Selected Fishes with Immediate Conservation Need in North Dakota Project T-14-R July 1, 2006 – December 31, 2008 Terry Steinwand Director Submitted by Michael G. McKenna Chief, Conservation and Communications Division Bismarck, ND June 2009 STATE WILDLIFE GRANT OBJECTIVES AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS SUMMARY State Agency: North Dakota Game and Fish Department Study/Grant Number: T-14-R Status of selected fishes with immediate conservation need in North Title: Dakota Period Begin/End Dates: July 1, 2006 to December 31, 2008 Principle Investigator & Dr. Charles Berry Organization: South Dakota State University Project Summary: The goals of this report are to synthesize our study of fishes of the Red River Basin with emphasis on 17 rare species, and provide distribution maps for these species. During the summers of 2006 and 2007, we conducted 137 different sampling occasions at 125 different locations on 40 different streams. We deployed sampling gear a total of 185 times. Eight species of concern (chestnut lamprey, hornyhead chub, largescale stoneroller, northern redbelly dace, pearl dace, silver chub, trout-perch, and yellow bullhead) were collected in the Red River drainage. We did not find silver lamprey, blacknose shiner, blackchin shiner, carmine shiner, finescale dace, logperch, and pugnose shiner, which were historically collected in Red River tributaries. Hornyhead chub was collected at the most sites and was the most abundant, followed by trout-perch. Hornyhead chub was found in the Forest and Park rivers whereas trout-perch was collected in five watersheds. We determined that the species of stoneroller present in the Red River basin is the largescale stoneroller, Campostoma oligolepis.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio River Islands National Wildlife Refuge Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan 2002
    Ohio River Islands National Wildlife Refuge Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan 2002 Comprehensive Conservation Plan INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND This Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) has been prepared for Ohio River Islands National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge). The CCP is a management tool to be used by the Refuge staff. It will help guide management decisions over the next 15 years, and set forth strategies for achieving Refuge goals and objectives within that timeframe. Overriding considerations reflected in the plan are that fish and wildlife conservation requires first priority in refuge management, and that wildlife-dependent recreation is allowed and encouraged as long as it is compatible with, or does not detract from, the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System or purposes of the Refuge. This chapter discusses the following topics: a brief description of the Ohio River Islands National Wildlife Refuge and how it came into existence; the purpose of and need for the plan; the purpose and vision of the Refuge; the National Wildlife Refuge System mission, goals and guiding principles, including the legal context which guides management; and other relevant plans and partnerships that affect Refuge management. This plan details program planning levels that are above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. This plan does not constitute a secure commitment for staffing increases, or funding for future refuge-specific land acquisitions, construction projects or operational and maintenance increases. Refuge Overview: History of Refuge Establishment, Acquisition, and Management The Ohio River Islands National Wildlife Refuge was established in 1990 under authority of the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, and was the first Refuge in West Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Flood Response of the Red River of the North Basin, North Dakota-Minnesota
    Changes in Flood Response of the Red River of the North Basin, North Dakota-Minnesota United States Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2243 Prepared in cooperation with the Upper Mississippi River Basin Commission Souris- Red-Rainy Regional Committee and the North Dakota State Water Commission Changes in Flood Response of the Red River of the North Basin, North Dakota-Minnesota By JEFFREY E. MILLER and DALE L. FRINK Prepared in cooperation with the Upper Mississippi River Basin Commission Souris- Red-Rainy Regional Committee and the North Dakota State Water Commission U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 2243 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1984 For sale by Distribution Branch Text Products Section U.S. Geological Survey 604 South Pickett Street Alexandria, Virginia 22304 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Miller, Jeffrey E. Changes in flood response of the Red River of the North Basin, North Dakota-Minnesota. (Water-supply paper; 2243) "Prepared in cooperation with the Upper Mississippi River Basin Commission, Souris-Red-Rainy Regional Committee, and the North Dakota State Water Commission." Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.12:2243 1. Floods Red River of the North Watershed. 2. Floods- Minnesota. 3. Floods North Dakota. I. Frink, Dale L. II. Upper Mississippi River Basin Commission. III. United States. Souris-Red-Rainy River Basins Commission. IV. North Dakota State Water Commission. V. Title.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report No: 17-02 Effect of Glacial Isostatic Adjust on Rivers
    Technical Report No: 17-02 EFFECT OF GLACIAL ISOSTATIC ADJUSTMENT ON RIVERS AND DRAINAGE BASINS IN THE RED RIVER VALLEY, NORTH DAKOTA AND MINNESOTA, U.S.A. by Benjamin York Philip J. Gerla Harold Hamm School of Geology and Geological Engineering University of North Dakota Grand Forks, ND 58202 November 2017 North Dakota Water Resources Research Institute North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota Technical Report No: 17-02 EFFECT OF GLACIAL ISOSTATIC ADJUSTMENT ON RIVERS AND DRAINAGE BASINS IN THE RED RIVER VALLEY, NORTH DAKOTA AND MINNESOTA, U.S.A. Benjamin York1 Philip J. Gerla2 WRRI Graduate Research Fellow1 Associate Professor, Harold Hamm School of Geology and Geological Engineering2 Grand Forks, ND 58202 November 2017 The work upon which this report is based was supported in part by federal funds provided by the United States of Department of Interior in the form of ND WRRI Graduate Research Fellowship for the graduate student through the North Dakota Water Resources Research Institute. Contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the US Department of Interior, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute their endorsement or recommendation for use by the US government. Project Period: March 1, 2016 – February 28, 2017 Project Number: 2016ND306B North Dakota Water Resources Research Institute Director: Eakalak Khan North Dakota State University TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]